Pub Date : 1979-01-01DOI: 10.1007/978-3-642-81265-1_22
U Gehring, E B Thompson
The basic phenomena of cell fusion and hybrid cell formation are briefly described and the potential of somatic cell hybridization in studies on the expression of differentiated cellular functions is discussed. The technique of cell hybridization has been applied to two types of cellular responses to glucocorticoids. The induction of specific proteins has been investigated in hybrids of inducible cells with uninducible cells. Most studies dealt with the liver-specific enzyme tyrosine aminotransferase, whose inducibility was extinguished in the majority of the hybrids between hepatoma and nonliver cells. However, upon chromosome segregation, inducibility reappeared in some of these hybrid cells. The current ideas about cellular control of inducibility are discussed. The other major glucocorticoid-responsive system investigated in cell hybridization studies consists of lymphoid cells which are killed when exposed to the steroid. Such sensitive cells were hybridized with several types of glucocorticoid-resistant lymphoid lines, and sensitivity was found to be dominant over resistence. Hybrids between sensitive and resistant lymphoid cells, however, showed an increase in the frequency at which resistance occurred as compared to the rate observed with the wild-type parental cells. No complementation to steroid sensitivity was found in hybrids between different types of resistant cells with defects in the glucocorticoid-specific receptor system.
{"title":"Somatic cell fusion in the study of glucocorticoid action.","authors":"U Gehring, E B Thompson","doi":"10.1007/978-3-642-81265-1_22","DOIUrl":"10.1007/978-3-642-81265-1_22","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The basic phenomena of cell fusion and hybrid cell formation are briefly described and the potential of somatic cell hybridization in studies on the expression of differentiated cellular functions is discussed. The technique of cell hybridization has been applied to two types of cellular responses to glucocorticoids. The induction of specific proteins has been investigated in hybrids of inducible cells with uninducible cells. Most studies dealt with the liver-specific enzyme tyrosine aminotransferase, whose inducibility was extinguished in the majority of the hybrids between hepatoma and nonliver cells. However, upon chromosome segregation, inducibility reappeared in some of these hybrid cells. The current ideas about cellular control of inducibility are discussed. The other major glucocorticoid-responsive system investigated in cell hybridization studies consists of lymphoid cells which are killed when exposed to the steroid. Such sensitive cells were hybridized with several types of glucocorticoid-resistant lymphoid lines, and sensitivity was found to be dominant over resistence. Hybrids between sensitive and resistant lymphoid cells, however, showed an increase in the frequency at which resistance occurred as compared to the rate observed with the wild-type parental cells. No complementation to steroid sensitivity was found in hybrids between different types of resistant cells with defects in the glucocorticoid-specific receptor system.</p>","PeriodicalId":76190,"journal":{"name":"Monographs on endocrinology","volume":"12 ","pages":"399-421"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"1979-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"11263013","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 1979-01-01DOI: 10.1007/978-3-642-81265-1_33
D K Granner
Recent research in hormone action has been aimed at studying single effects in well-defined systems. As exemplified in several chapters of this book, it has been possible to deduce a general mechanism of action of the glucocorticoids using this approach. Most hormones, and the glucocorticoids in particular, do not act as independent agents in the intact animal. Although the best known example of how glucocorticoids interact with other hormones is the amplification of the effect of those whose action is mediated by cAMP, these steroids also augment the effects of a variety of other hormones and effectors. Such interactions are of interest in clinical medicine as well, since glucocorticoid hormones are used in combination with other drugs in a number of conditions, including the treatment of asthma, allergies, and certain kinds of shock and cancer. Neither the biochemical nor the pharmacologic basis for the effects of the glucocorticoids is known. In some cases the actions of other hormones are not observed unless the tissue has first been exposed to glucocorticoids. In these instances the glucocorticoids are said to exert a "permissive effect," since they allow a process to proceed at a maximal rate even though the steroid itself has no effect on this process. There is no doubt that such examples exist, as documented above: thus the concept of a "permissive effect" does have utility. The term fails to describe the more general role the glucocorticoids play, since in many instances the steroid also has a direct effect on the process itself, or optimizes a process in which the primary effector is not as yet known. Because of these cases, and because the historically more general usage first proposed by INGLE [1] seems to have been forgotten, use of the term "permissive effect" has been avoided in this chapter. An ultimate goal in glucocorticoid hormone research is to identify the mechanisms involved in the amplification effect these hormones exert. Now that the actions of these hormones and of the hormones they interact with are being defined, such work is within the realm of feasibility.
{"title":"The role of glucocorticoid hormones as biological amplifiers.","authors":"D K Granner","doi":"10.1007/978-3-642-81265-1_33","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-81265-1_33","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Recent research in hormone action has been aimed at studying single effects in well-defined systems. As exemplified in several chapters of this book, it has been possible to deduce a general mechanism of action of the glucocorticoids using this approach. Most hormones, and the glucocorticoids in particular, do not act as independent agents in the intact animal. Although the best known example of how glucocorticoids interact with other hormones is the amplification of the effect of those whose action is mediated by cAMP, these steroids also augment the effects of a variety of other hormones and effectors. Such interactions are of interest in clinical medicine as well, since glucocorticoid hormones are used in combination with other drugs in a number of conditions, including the treatment of asthma, allergies, and certain kinds of shock and cancer. Neither the biochemical nor the pharmacologic basis for the effects of the glucocorticoids is known. In some cases the actions of other hormones are not observed unless the tissue has first been exposed to glucocorticoids. In these instances the glucocorticoids are said to exert a \"permissive effect,\" since they allow a process to proceed at a maximal rate even though the steroid itself has no effect on this process. There is no doubt that such examples exist, as documented above: thus the concept of a \"permissive effect\" does have utility. The term fails to describe the more general role the glucocorticoids play, since in many instances the steroid also has a direct effect on the process itself, or optimizes a process in which the primary effector is not as yet known. Because of these cases, and because the historically more general usage first proposed by INGLE [1] seems to have been forgotten, use of the term \"permissive effect\" has been avoided in this chapter. An ultimate goal in glucocorticoid hormone research is to identify the mechanisms involved in the amplification effect these hormones exert. Now that the actions of these hormones and of the hormones they interact with are being defined, such work is within the realm of feasibility.</p>","PeriodicalId":76190,"journal":{"name":"Monographs on endocrinology","volume":"12 ","pages":"593-611"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"1979-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"11263015","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 1979-01-01DOI: 10.1007/978-3-642-81265-1_25
B S McEwen
Adrenocortical secretions influence neuroendocrine function and behavior, and it is possible to recognize separate physiologic actions of gluco- and mineralocorticoids. The search for neuroanatomical sites and cellular modes of adrenocorticoid action has revealed a system of putative glucocorticoid receptors in neurons of the hippocampus, septum, amygdala, and entorhinal cortex, and in the pituitary. No part of the brain is totally devoid of receptor activity, however, and glial cells may also contain glucocorticoid receptors. Mineralocorticoid receptors are less well characterized neuroanatomically or biochemically. One reason for this is the considerable degree to which both gluco- and mineralocorticoids bind to both classes of receptors in vitro. Another reason may be the overwhelming quantitative predominance of glucocorticoid over mineralocorticoid receptors in neural tissue. Glucocorticoid receptors of the pituitary, which have a high avidity for dexamethasone, appear to participate in the delayed negative feedback effects of glucocoticoids. Functional correlates of neural glucocorticoid receptors remain to be clearly established. Among the possibilities are several reported effects on hippocampal neural activity that have an onset latency of 20--30 min and a duration of several hours. The relative rapidity of such effects does not preclude genomic mediation, as genomic effects of glucocorticoids on thymus lymphocytes have been detected within as little as 15 min of steroid application [117]. What are not so far explained by the intracellular receptor mechanism are the extremely rapid effects of glucocorticoids such as the rate-sensitive negative feedback on CRF and ACTH secretion. These may involve a direct action of the steroid on cell membranes in the pituitary and hypothalamus.
{"title":"Influences of adrenocortical hormones on pituitary and brain function.","authors":"B S McEwen","doi":"10.1007/978-3-642-81265-1_25","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-81265-1_25","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Adrenocortical secretions influence neuroendocrine function and behavior, and it is possible to recognize separate physiologic actions of gluco- and mineralocorticoids. The search for neuroanatomical sites and cellular modes of adrenocorticoid action has revealed a system of putative glucocorticoid receptors in neurons of the hippocampus, septum, amygdala, and entorhinal cortex, and in the pituitary. No part of the brain is totally devoid of receptor activity, however, and glial cells may also contain glucocorticoid receptors. Mineralocorticoid receptors are less well characterized neuroanatomically or biochemically. One reason for this is the considerable degree to which both gluco- and mineralocorticoids bind to both classes of receptors in vitro. Another reason may be the overwhelming quantitative predominance of glucocorticoid over mineralocorticoid receptors in neural tissue. Glucocorticoid receptors of the pituitary, which have a high avidity for dexamethasone, appear to participate in the delayed negative feedback effects of glucocoticoids. Functional correlates of neural glucocorticoid receptors remain to be clearly established. Among the possibilities are several reported effects on hippocampal neural activity that have an onset latency of 20--30 min and a duration of several hours. The relative rapidity of such effects does not preclude genomic mediation, as genomic effects of glucocorticoids on thymus lymphocytes have been detected within as little as 15 min of steroid application [117]. What are not so far explained by the intracellular receptor mechanism are the extremely rapid effects of glucocorticoids such as the rate-sensitive negative feedback on CRF and ACTH secretion. These may involve a direct action of the steroid on cell membranes in the pituitary and hypothalamus.</p>","PeriodicalId":76190,"journal":{"name":"Monographs on endocrinology","volume":"12 ","pages":"467-92"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"1979-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"11441944","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 1979-01-01DOI: 10.1007/978-3-642-81265-1_30
T D Gelehrter
Glucocorticoids affect the composition and function of the plasma membrane in a variety of cell types. Cultured rat hepatoma (HTC) cells in tissue culture provide an excellent model system for analysis of such effects. In these cells, dexamethasone rapidly and dramatically inhibits the influx of amino acids sharing the A or alanine-preferring transport system. Inhibition is half-maximal within 2 h, and maximal after 6 h incubation with the hormone. The inhibition is rapidly reversed by insulin, and more slowly by removing the steroid. Microtubules and microfilaments are not apparently involved in this hormonal effect, but continuous protein synthesis is required for the glucocorticoid inhibition of transport. Dexamethasone also decreases the number of microvilli on the surface of HTC cells, increases their adhesiveness to a substratum, and dramatically decreases the production of plasminogen activator, but it does not affect the growth rate or plating efficiency of the cells. Variant cell lines stably resistant to dexamethasone inhibition of plasminogen activator production have been isolated using an agar-fibrin overlay technique to detect protease production by individual colonies of HTC cells. The hormonal resistance to inhibition of protease production is associated witha maintenance of inducibility of other glucocorticoid-regulated functions and therefore is not apparently secondary to abnormal or absent glucocorticoid receptor, but due to a lesion in a later step in hormone action specific for plasminogen activator. Combined genetic and biochemical analysis of such dexamethasone-resistant variants should facilitate study of the hormonal regulation of specific membrane phenotypes and of the role of proteases in this regulation.
{"title":"Glucocorticoids and the plasma membrane.","authors":"T D Gelehrter","doi":"10.1007/978-3-642-81265-1_30","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-81265-1_30","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Glucocorticoids affect the composition and function of the plasma membrane in a variety of cell types. Cultured rat hepatoma (HTC) cells in tissue culture provide an excellent model system for analysis of such effects. In these cells, dexamethasone rapidly and dramatically inhibits the influx of amino acids sharing the A or alanine-preferring transport system. Inhibition is half-maximal within 2 h, and maximal after 6 h incubation with the hormone. The inhibition is rapidly reversed by insulin, and more slowly by removing the steroid. Microtubules and microfilaments are not apparently involved in this hormonal effect, but continuous protein synthesis is required for the glucocorticoid inhibition of transport. Dexamethasone also decreases the number of microvilli on the surface of HTC cells, increases their adhesiveness to a substratum, and dramatically decreases the production of plasminogen activator, but it does not affect the growth rate or plating efficiency of the cells. Variant cell lines stably resistant to dexamethasone inhibition of plasminogen activator production have been isolated using an agar-fibrin overlay technique to detect protease production by individual colonies of HTC cells. The hormonal resistance to inhibition of protease production is associated witha maintenance of inducibility of other glucocorticoid-regulated functions and therefore is not apparently secondary to abnormal or absent glucocorticoid receptor, but due to a lesion in a later step in hormone action specific for plasminogen activator. Combined genetic and biochemical analysis of such dexamethasone-resistant variants should facilitate study of the hormonal regulation of specific membrane phenotypes and of the role of proteases in this regulation.</p>","PeriodicalId":76190,"journal":{"name":"Monographs on endocrinology","volume":"12 ","pages":"561-74"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"1979-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"11593695","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 1979-01-01DOI: 10.1007/978-3-642-81265-1_24
A S Fauci
{"title":"Immunosuppressive and anti-inflammatory effects of glucocorticoids.","authors":"A S Fauci","doi":"10.1007/978-3-642-81265-1_24","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-81265-1_24","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":76190,"journal":{"name":"Monographs on endocrinology","volume":"12 ","pages":"449-65"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"1979-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"11593691","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 1979-01-01DOI: 10.1007/978-3-642-81265-1_4
J P Schmit, G G Rousseau
The approaches currently available for determining the structure and conformation of glucocorticoids are reviewed. We discuss the optimization of steroid geometry based on the relative molecular energy calculated by a Westheimer equation. This method permits an extensive description of steroid molecules in a state free of external constraints and which can be assumed to correspond to the minimum internal energy. The structures, conformations, surface areas, and volumes of fifteen steroid molecules that interact with the glucocorticoid receptor have been studied. The basic structure of the A ring is a 1 alpha,2 beta-half-chair, whatever the substitutions. Rings B and C are semi-rigid chairs virtually uninfluenced by substituent groups. In contrast, the shape of the D ring depends on the nature and environment of the substituents. As to the fundamental conformation of the side chain, the steroids fall into two categories, depending on the pressure of a 17-hydroxyl group. For a given molecule, the energy changes associated with conformations of the side chain other than that corresponding to the minimum energy have also been explored. The hypothesis is formulated that receptor binding requires a particular conformation of the side chain. Finally, the overall shape of the molecule can be influenced by the summation of minor but numerous changes brought about by various substitutions, such as 11 beta-hydroxyl, which increases the convexity of the molecule. These investigations should help in elucidating structure-activity relationships for glucocorticoids. They may improve our knowledge of the interaction between these hormones and their receptor and of the molecular mechanism of glucocorticoid action.
{"title":"Structure and conformation of glucocorticoids.","authors":"J P Schmit, G G Rousseau","doi":"10.1007/978-3-642-81265-1_4","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-81265-1_4","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The approaches currently available for determining the structure and conformation of glucocorticoids are reviewed. We discuss the optimization of steroid geometry based on the relative molecular energy calculated by a Westheimer equation. This method permits an extensive description of steroid molecules in a state free of external constraints and which can be assumed to correspond to the minimum internal energy. The structures, conformations, surface areas, and volumes of fifteen steroid molecules that interact with the glucocorticoid receptor have been studied. The basic structure of the A ring is a 1 alpha,2 beta-half-chair, whatever the substitutions. Rings B and C are semi-rigid chairs virtually uninfluenced by substituent groups. In contrast, the shape of the D ring depends on the nature and environment of the substituents. As to the fundamental conformation of the side chain, the steroids fall into two categories, depending on the pressure of a 17-hydroxyl group. For a given molecule, the energy changes associated with conformations of the side chain other than that corresponding to the minimum energy have also been explored. The hypothesis is formulated that receptor binding requires a particular conformation of the side chain. Finally, the overall shape of the molecule can be influenced by the summation of minor but numerous changes brought about by various substitutions, such as 11 beta-hydroxyl, which increases the convexity of the molecule. These investigations should help in elucidating structure-activity relationships for glucocorticoids. They may improve our knowledge of the interaction between these hormones and their receptor and of the molecular mechanism of glucocorticoid action.</p>","PeriodicalId":76190,"journal":{"name":"Monographs on endocrinology","volume":"12 ","pages":"79-95"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"1979-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"11593697","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 1979-01-01DOI: 10.1007/978-3-642-81265-1_3
G G Rousseau, J D Baxter
Glucocorticoid receptors are found in most mammalian tissues and have been studied in detail in a number of tissue culture systems. With cells that have not been exposed to steroids, the receptors are found in the cytoplasmic fraction from which they can be isolated and studied. Methods for studying glucocorticoid receptors depend on their high-affinity specific binding of radioactive steroids. The reversible interaction is intracellular. It follows Michaelian kinetics, at least in cell-free cytosol, and involves a thermodynamically homogeneous population of about 10 000 sites per cell. The receptor is an asymmetric, slightly acidic protein of about 100 000 daltons. It is very labile, especially in the unbound form. Binding activity depends on the integrity of thiol groups and perhaps on phosphorylation of amino acid residues. Although indirect, the evidence is overwhelmingly convincing that this protein is the physiologic glucocorticoid receptor. The time-kinetics of binding and dissociation are consistent with the sequence of events in glucocorticoid action. Various steroid analogs display binding characteristics predictable from their glucocorticoid activity. Loss of the binding protein from certain cultured cell lines is accompanied by unresponsiveness to glucocorticoids. The extensive tissue distribution of receptors parallels the extensive role of glucocorticoids in regulation. Finally, there is a strong correlation between nuclear binding of receptors and nuclear effects of the steroid. The glucocorticoid receptor can be distinguished from other glucocorticoid-binding proteins, based on their steroid specificity and physicochemical properties. There is no clear-cut demonstration that the receptor differs from tissue to tissue, and it is in fact very similar in various species. Unlike in other systems, receptor concentration does not seem to be regulated by its ligand or by other hormones. However, certain cases of hypo- as well as hypersensitivity to glucocorticoids appear to result from changes at the receptor level. The data indicate that the receptor can exist in inactive and active forms. The former predominate in the absence of steroid or when an angatonist is bound. Glucocorticoid agonists bind the active form, allowing it to be "activated" and subsequently bound to the nucleus. All of the receptors in isolated cytosol do not appear to be available for immediate occupancy by an agonist and this may be due to the time required for conversion of the receptors from inactive to active forms. The correlations between receptor binding and the glucocorticoid response indicate that the receptor is a rate-limiting factor in the magnitude and kinetics of the response, and this finding has important implications regarding mechanisms.
{"title":"Glucocorticoid receptors.","authors":"G G Rousseau, J D Baxter","doi":"10.1007/978-3-642-81265-1_3","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-81265-1_3","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Glucocorticoid receptors are found in most mammalian tissues and have been studied in detail in a number of tissue culture systems. With cells that have not been exposed to steroids, the receptors are found in the cytoplasmic fraction from which they can be isolated and studied. Methods for studying glucocorticoid receptors depend on their high-affinity specific binding of radioactive steroids. The reversible interaction is intracellular. It follows Michaelian kinetics, at least in cell-free cytosol, and involves a thermodynamically homogeneous population of about 10 000 sites per cell. The receptor is an asymmetric, slightly acidic protein of about 100 000 daltons. It is very labile, especially in the unbound form. Binding activity depends on the integrity of thiol groups and perhaps on phosphorylation of amino acid residues. Although indirect, the evidence is overwhelmingly convincing that this protein is the physiologic glucocorticoid receptor. The time-kinetics of binding and dissociation are consistent with the sequence of events in glucocorticoid action. Various steroid analogs display binding characteristics predictable from their glucocorticoid activity. Loss of the binding protein from certain cultured cell lines is accompanied by unresponsiveness to glucocorticoids. The extensive tissue distribution of receptors parallels the extensive role of glucocorticoids in regulation. Finally, there is a strong correlation between nuclear binding of receptors and nuclear effects of the steroid. The glucocorticoid receptor can be distinguished from other glucocorticoid-binding proteins, based on their steroid specificity and physicochemical properties. There is no clear-cut demonstration that the receptor differs from tissue to tissue, and it is in fact very similar in various species. Unlike in other systems, receptor concentration does not seem to be regulated by its ligand or by other hormones. However, certain cases of hypo- as well as hypersensitivity to glucocorticoids appear to result from changes at the receptor level. The data indicate that the receptor can exist in inactive and active forms. The former predominate in the absence of steroid or when an angatonist is bound. Glucocorticoid agonists bind the active form, allowing it to be \"activated\" and subsequently bound to the nucleus. All of the receptors in isolated cytosol do not appear to be available for immediate occupancy by an agonist and this may be due to the time required for conversion of the receptors from inactive to active forms. The correlations between receptor binding and the glucocorticoid response indicate that the receptor is a rate-limiting factor in the magnitude and kinetics of the response, and this finding has important implications regarding mechanisms.</p>","PeriodicalId":76190,"journal":{"name":"Monographs on endocrinology","volume":"12 ","pages":"49-77"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"1979-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"11593692","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Gordon M. Tomkins - a dedication.","authors":"I S Edelman","doi":"","DOIUrl":"","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":76190,"journal":{"name":"Monographs on endocrinology","volume":"12 ","pages":"xviii-xix"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"1979-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"11593828","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 1979-01-01DOI: 10.1007/978-3-642-81265-1_17
L K Johnson, J D Baxter, G G Rousseau
{"title":"Mechanisms of glucocorticoid receptor function.","authors":"L K Johnson, J D Baxter, G G Rousseau","doi":"10.1007/978-3-642-81265-1_17","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-81265-1_17","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":76190,"journal":{"name":"Monographs on endocrinology","volume":"12 ","pages":"305-26"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"1979-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"11441943","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}