Background: A considerable volume of possible applications of artificial intelligence (AI) in the field of rhinology exists, and research in the area is rapidly evolving.
Objective: This scoping review aims to provide a brief overview of all current literature on AI in the field of rhinology. Further, it aims to highlight gaps in the literature for future rhinology researchers.
Methods: OVID MEDLINE (1946-2022) and EMBASE (1974-2022) were searched from January 1, 2017 until May 14, 2022 to identify all relevant articles. The Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses Extension for Scoping Reviews checklist was used to guide the review.
Results: A total of 2420 results were identified of which 62 met the eligibility criteria. A further 17 articles were included through bibliography searching, for a total of 79 articles on AI in rhinology. Each year resulted in an increase in the number of publications, from 3 articles published in 2017 to 31 articles published in 2021. Articles were produced by authors from 22 countries with a relative majority coming from the USA (19%), China (19%), and South Korea (13%). Articles were placed into 1 of 5 categories: phenotyping/endotyping (n = 12), radiological diagnostics (n = 42), prognostication (n = 10), non-radiological diagnostics (n = 7), surgical assessment/planning (n = 8). Diagnostic or prognostic utility of the AI algorithms were rated as excellent (n = 29), very good (n = 25), good (n = 7), sufficient (n = 1), bad (n = 2), or was not reported/not applicable (n = 15).
Conclusions: AI is experiencing an increasingly significant role in rhinology research. Articles are showing high rates of diagnostic accuracy and are being published at an almost exponential rate around the world. Utilizing AI in radiological diagnosis was the most published topic of research, however, AI in rhinology is still in its infancy and there are several topics yet to be thoroughly explored.
Background: Most studies that seek to analyze the prevalence of allergic rhinitis do not include preschool children and the diagnosis in this age group is difficult.
Objective: Identify complementary tests to the diagnosis of allergic rhinitis in preschool children and verify if there is scientific robustness to propose a diagnostic algorithm for this condition in this age group.
Methods: Systematic review of the literature in four databases: SCIELO, PubMed/MEDLINE, LILACS and SCOPUS. Each article was initially chosen by title, abstract and by the keywords "allergic rhinitis," "diagnosis" and "preschool." Those articles selected entered the complete reading and data extraction phase. The study was registered in the International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews under number CRD42020207053.
Results: Fourteen articles were suitable for analysis. In the assessment using Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies - 2, all studies had at least one domain considered "high risk" or "undetermined risk." Seven reports of nasal cytology, seven of specific IgE, four of immediate hypersensitivity skin test, one of nasal nitric oxide, three of total IgE and one of urinary leukotriene E4 were found. Eight articles evaluated more than one diagnostic test.
Conclusion: There are no defined criteria for the diagnosis of allergic rhinitis in preschool children. Nasal cytology, serum specific IgE and immediate hypersensitivity skin test were the most used tests. A reliable diagnostic criterion in this age group is necessary so that in the future it is possible to propose a diagnostic algorithm for allergic rhinitis in preschool children.
Objective: To determine the in-hospital cost implications of an endoscopic expanded endonasal approach (EEEA) for meningioma resection relative to the open transcranial approach.
Methods: All anterior skull base meningioma surgeries performed over a period from January 1st, 2015 to October 31th, 2017 were evaluated. The electronic medical record was reviewed for patient factors, tumor characteristics, and cost variables associated with each hospital stay and univariate analysis was performed using R software. All cost data were converted into August 2021-equivalent dollar amounts using the United States Bureau of Labor Statistics consumer price index.
Results: Thirty-five patients met study criteria, including 27 patients undergoing an open transcranial approach and 8 undergoing an EEEA. Average length of stay for patients undergoing an open approach was 9.3 days compared to 5.6 within the EEEA group (P = .126). The average total in-hospital cost of patient undergoing an EEEA was $35417.1 compared to $46406.9 among patients undergoing an open transcranial approach (P = .168). On univariate analysis, the cost of an open transcranial approach relative to the EEEA was $10989.8 (P = .411).
Conclusions: The open transcranial approach remained the dominant surgical approach to anterior skull base meningiomas over our study time period. However, despite limited patient numbers the EEEA was associated with decreased total in-hospital costs.
Background: Chronic rhinosinusitis without nasal polyps (CRSsNP) represents a phenotype of CRS, whose immunological mechanisms are still unclear. So far there are neither suitable biomarkers to determine the course of the disease nor an individual therapy.
Objective: The purpose of this study was to characterize the CRSsNP endotype by identifying and validating non-invasive proteomic biomarkers.
Methods: A highly-multiplexed proteomic array consisting of antibodies against 2000 proteins was used to identify proteins that are differentially expressed in the nasal mucus of the CRSsNP and control groups (n = 7 per group). The proteins identified to be most differentially expressed were validated in matched nasal mucus samples using western blots and enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA). Validation was also done in a second cohort using western blots (CRSsNP n = 25, control n = 23) and ELISA (n = 30 per group). Additionally, immunohistochemistry in CRSsNP and control tissue samples was performed to characterize the selected proteins further.
Results: Out of the 2000 proteins examined, 7 from the most differentially expressed proteins were chosen to be validated. The validation results showed that 4 proteins were significantly upregulated in CRSsNP mucus, including macrophage inflammatory protein-1beta (MIP-1β), resistin, high mobility group box 1 (HMGB1), and forkhead box protein 3 (FOXP3). Cartilage acidic protein 1 (CRTAC1) was not significantly upregulated. Two proteins were significantly downregulated including scavenger receptor class F member 2 (SCARF2) and P-selectin. All proteins selected are mainly associated with inflammation, cell proliferation/differentiation, apoptosis and cell-cell or cell-matrix interaction.
Conclusion: Proteomic analysis of CRSsNP and control mucus has confirmed known and revealed novel disease-associated proteins that could potentially serve as a new biosignature for CRSsNP. Analysis of the associated pathways will specify endotypes of CRSsNP and will lead to an improved understanding of the pathophysiology of CRSsNP. Furthermore, our data contribute to the development of a reproducible, non-invasive, and quantitative "liquid biopsy" for rhinosinusitis.
Objective: Aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of topical intranasal insulin on healing of nasal mucosa in a rat model.
Methods: Forty-eight Wistar rats, weighing between 250 and 300 g and aged 10-12 weeks were used and randomized into two equal groups. 1.9 mm curette was introduced through the left nostril and 1.9 mm mucosa from the left nasal septum was curetted. Postoperatively, animals in the control group received 1 mL of physiologic saline, 3 times a day in a nasal irrigation fashion. Animals in the experimental group received 1 mL of 5 IU/mL regular insulin in saline solution. Subjects were sacrificed after 5, 10, and 15 days and macroscopic and histomorphometric evaluations were performed.
Results: There were no mucosal synechiae and septal perforation macroscopically. Histological examination revealed that the defect size reduction was 21% in the saline group versus 56% in the insulin group on the fifth day (p = 0.006). There was 62% defect reduction in the saline group versus 79% in the insulin group on the 10th day (p = 0.034). On the 15th day, only 67% of saline group animals had complete defect closure, whereas 100% of animals treated with insulin had complete closure (92% vs 100% mucosal defect reduction, p = 0.036). Both edema and inflammation were less in the insulin group on 15th day (p = 0.006; p = 0.023, respectively).
Conclusion: The results from this study support the safety and efficacy of topical insulin on wound healing in the literature. This study could guide further experimental studies that examine human sinonasal wound healing.
Purpose: Nitric oxide (NO) is a potential marker in the diagnosis and monitoring of treatment for the management of patients with allergic rhinitis (AR). The study aimed to determine the value of nasal fractional exhaled nitric oxide (FeNO) in the diagnosis and treatment response of AR patients.
Methods: The participants were divided into control and allergic rhinitis groups based on the clinical symptoms and skin prick tests. The AR group was treated with intranasal corticosteroid after the diagnosis. The nasal fractional exhaled nitric oxide (FENO) levels were compared between control and AR groups. In the AR group, the visual analogue scale (VAS), Nasal Obstruction Symptoms Evaluation (NOSE) questionnaire, and nasal fractional exhaled nitric oxide (FeNO) were assessed pre- and post-treatment.
Results: One hundred ten adults were enrolled. The nasal FeNO level was significantly higher in AR compared to control (p < 0.001). Both the subjective (VAS and NOSE), both (p < 0.01) and objective (nasal FeNO, p < 0.001) assessments showed significant different pre- and post-treatment. The threshold level of nasal FeNO in the diagnosis of AR was 390.0 ppb (sensitivity of 73% and specificity of 80%) based on the receiver operator characteristic curve.
Conclusion: Nasal FeNO level is significantly higher in AR compared to control group with significant difference pre- and post-treatment. The findings suggest nasal FeNO can serve as an adjunct diagnostic tool together with the monitoring of treatment response in AR.
Background: Informed consent requires preoperative discussion of surgical risks, complications, and alternative treatment options. Allegations of incomplete informed consent are common in the field of otolaryngology.
Objectives: Analyze outcomes and case variables in cases of alleged informed consent failure involving otolaryngologists.
Methods: A legal research database containing state and federal case records from across the United States was retrospectively reviewed for malpractice claims involving informed consent and otolaryngology.
Results: Among the 128 informed consent cases identified, 72.6% resulted in favorable verdicts for otolaryngologists. Functional endoscopic sinus surgery (FESS) was the most common source of informed consent litigation in the field of otolaryngology, with an incidence four-fold higher than the next most litigated procedure of uvulopalatopharyngoplasty (21.9% vs 5.4%). The top four factors cited in FESS-related cases were CSF leak (10), inadequate discussion of alternative therapies (4), diplopia (3), and meningitis (3). Cases resulting in a transient injury were significantly less likely to result in a payment from a plaintiff verdict or settlement (9.1%) as compared to payment-rates among cases involving permanent complications (34.6%) (p = 0.005).
Conclusions: Failure to obtain informed consent is an important factor in medical malpractice litigation. This report identifies specific, actionable recommendations aimed at protecting sinus surgeons from liability and ensuring that patients are better informed.
Background: Allergic rhinitis (AR) is a chronic nasal inflammation, characterized by nasal epithelial dysfunction. Gene therapy targeting transcription factors is a promising strategy for quenching allergic inflammation, including AR.
Objective: This study sought to probe the mechanism of Kruppel-like factor 4 (KLF4) in pyroptosis of nasal mucosal epithelial cells (NEpCs) in AR mice and provide targets for AR treatment.
Methods: AR mouse models were established using sensitization with ovalbumin, followed by injection with short hairpin RNA KLF4 (sh-KLF4). AR symptoms were assessed by the times of sneezing and nose rubbing, hematoxylin-eosin, and periodic acid-Schiff staining. Levels of KLF4, nucleotide-binding oligomerization domain-like receptor family pyrin domain containing 3 (NLRP3), cleaved caspase-1, and N-terminal domain (GSDMD-N) in nasal mucosal tissues were determined by Western blot assay, and levels of interleukin (IL)-1β and IL-18 in nasal lavage fluid were determined by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay. The binding of KLF4 to the NLRP3 promoter was verified using chromatin immunoprecipitation and dual-luciferase assays. The functional rescue experiment was performed with oe-NLRP3 and sh-KLF4 in AR mice.
Results: KLF4 was upregulated in nasal mucosal tissues of AR mice. KLF4 inhibition reduced the times of sneezing and nose rubbing, inflammatory cell infiltration, and goblet cell hyperplasia in nasal mucosal tissues, and levels of NLRP3, cleaved caspase-1, GSDMD-N, IL-1β, and IL-18. KLF4 was enriched on the NLRP3 promoter and improved NLRP3 expression. NLRP3 overexpression reversed the inhibition of sh-KLF4 on pyroptosis of NEpCs in AR mice.
Conclusion: KLF4 bound to the NLRP3 promoter and promoted pyroptosis of NEpCs in AR mice via activating NLRP3.