Scandinavian journal of urology and nephrology. Supplementum最新文献

High-grade prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia (PIN) is the most likely precursor of prostatic carcinoma. PIN has a high predictive value as a marker for carcinoma, and its identification in biopsy specimens warrants repeat biopsy for concurrent or subsequent carcinoma. The only methods of detection are biopsy and transurethral resection; PIN does not significantly elevate serum PSA concentration or its derivatives, nor does it induce a palpable mass, and cannot be detected by ultrasound. Androgen deprivation therapy decreases the prevalence and extent of PIN, suggesting that this form of treatment may play a role in chemoprevention. Radiation therapy is also associated with a decreased incidence of PIN.

This review summarizes published data dealing with the prevalence of high-grade prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia (HGPIN) in a variety of prostate tissue samples. Additionally, we have attempted to document the relationship between HGPIN and the pathological parameters of prostate cancer in autopsy and radical prostatectomy specimens. Studies reporting the prevalence of HGPIN in needle biopsies, transurethral resection specimens and radical prostatectomy specimens, and those documenting the lesion in postmortem settings are compared. We also summarize studies in which the distribution and/or extent of HGPIN was correlated with prostate cancer stage, grade and volume. There is significant variation in the reported frequency of HGPIN, particularly in needle biopsy specimens, with a range of 0.8-23.9%. The factors responsible for these discrepancies include the population studied, the limited sample size that needle biopsies represent, diagnostic inconsistencies and, possibly, tissue preparation/staining variables. Because of the important implications a diagnosis of HGPIN carries, there is a pressing need to achieve greater consistency in diagnosing and reporting the lesion. Better targeted educational efforts, including teaching courses, websites with illustrations and the possibility of teleconsultations, are among possible means to attain this goal. Better documentation of the evolution of HGPIN to cancer through clinical follow-up is also recommended.

Although a considerable number of penile cancers may arise de novo, certain potentially premalignant conditions do exist. We account in some detail for precancerous growths, which may initially be misclassified and not submitted to proper therapy and follow-up. At one end of the spectrum disorders exist that are generally considered as medically benign, such as warty tumors; at the other end growths occur that are highly indicative of being potentially invasive, i.e. giant condylomas, bowenoid papulosis, eythroplasia of Queyrat and Bowen's disease. We also focus on elucidating the clinical behavior of some inflammatory conditions, which may either be of pathogenic significance for squamous cell carcinoma development or give rise to differential diagnostic problems, most importantly lichen sclerosus et atrophicus (balanitis xerotica obliterans). We advocate a vigilant approach for histopathological evaluation whenever any clinical diagnostic uncertainty or therapeutic recalcitrance exists. We also favor the administration of highly active topical therapy against penile chronic inflammatory conditions such as lichen sclerosus et atrophicus, careful clinical follow-up of these cases and surgical treatment of phimosis.

Carcinoma in situ (CIS) of the testis is a common precursor of germ-cell tumours in adults and adolescents, with the exception of spermatocytic seminoma. This article reviews existing knowledge on the pathobiology, genetic aspects and epidemiology of CIS, discusses current hypotheses concerning pathogenesis and invasive progression of germ-cell neoplasms and provides guidelines for diagnosis and clinical management of CIS.

The presence of high-grade prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia (PIN) in a prostate biopsy is a considerable risk factor for the presence of prostate cancer, with up to 73% of patients having cancer on rebiopsy. The risk is related to the clinical setting (screening vs urological practice) and patient factors such as prostatic serum antigen (PSA) and findings on digital rectal examination (DRE). Thus, high-grade PIN has serious clinical implications. The aim of this paper is to propose practical guidelines for the clinical management of PIN. Based on current knowledge we recommend that: Only patients considered for curative treatment of prostate cancer be further investigated for a PIN biopsy finding; A palpable nodule or tumor-suspicious transrectal ultrasonography (TRUS) finding, in conjunction with a finding of high-grade PIN on prostate biopsy, should prompt rebiopsy; An elevated PSA level or an elevated PSA density should also warrant repeat biopsy, as the most likely cause of PSA elevation is concomitant prostate cancer; The presence of high-grade PIN on biopsy without concomitant prostate cancer in patients suitable for curative treatment, notwithstanding normal DRE, TRUS or PSA, should prompt repeat biopsies, as the association with prostate cancer is significant; The presence of PIN alone on biopsy does not warrant treatment, as a substantial number of rebiopsies yield only PIN.

Markers have revealed the presence of phenotypically abnormal areas in histologically benign urothelium in bladders containing transitional cell carcinomas. This finding strongly suggests that at least some bladder cancers are associated with changes in the field and that markers can detect these lesions before they reach a grossly malignant stage. Markers have been used clinically for the detection of cancer in patients who are under regular surveillance for recurrence of bladder cancer. Much less information is available regarding the use of markers to detect bladder cancer without a prior history of the disease and for the prediction of which tumors are biologically more aggressive. However, ongoing clinical trials are addressing the latter issue. The type of specimen and its preparation will determine what type of markers can be analyzed. Although marker performance is based upon sensitivity and specificity, the prevalence of bladder cancer in the population being tested will dramatically affect the positive predictive value of an assay. Markers with high positive predictive value are indicators for interventions, such as biopsy, while markers with high negative specific values are useful for avoiding interventions. Cytology is used to detect occult high-grade neoplasms such as carcinoma in situ. While not yet clinically validated, tests with high negative predictive value could be used to decrease the frequency of cystoscopic evaluation. Markers must be validated by testing them prospectively using previously defined cut-off values. Furthermore, markers that will be used to alter treatment should be tested prospectively to determine the safety and cost-effectiveness of this strategy. Recommendations for future work include: (1) evaluation of markers in patients with dysplasia defined by the current pathologic classification; (2) evaluation of markers as indicators of tumor recurrence; (3) evaluation of markers as indicators of tumor progression; and (4) evaluation of markers in chemoprevention studies.

The Enuresis Resource and Information Centre (ERIC) is a UK-based charity that works with parents, carers, professionals, and children with nocturnal enuresis (NE). The charity has recently commissioned York University's centre for reviews and dissemination to undertake a detailed analysis of studies that measure the effectiveness of the most common psychological and pharmacological treatments for NE. This included reviewing 960 research articles from around the world. The resulting review will direct thinking in the UK towards the most effective treatment approaches. A brief summary presented at conferences in addition to data from ERIC's own clinical practice database shows the distribution and type of enuresis clinic currently being run within the UK.