The Journal of the Florida Medical Association最新文献

Background: The purpose of this case report is to illustrate the utility of radio-guided mapping of sentinel lymph nodes (SLN's) as demonstrated by the technique's successful identification of nodes containing metastatic disease that would have been left behind if only the visual-oriented vital blue dye mapping technique had been used.

Method: The patient underwent preoperative lymphoscintigraphy and intra-operative lymphatic mapping using vital blue dye and radiolymphoscintigraphy using the Neoprobe (handheld gamma probe). Nodes which were blue and/or "hot" (i.e., radioactive counts were three times the background count) were considered SLN's.

Results: Four SLN's were harvested, all of which were "hot" but only one of which was both "hot" and blue. Pathology revealed that the two SLN's positive for metastatic disease were not blue.

Conclusion: While the blue dye lymphatic mapping technique provides the surgeon with a visual road map in the identification of SLN's, the Neoprobe increases the success rate of localization when compared to vital blue dye mapping due to the reliable migration of radiocolloid to the SLN's in the regional basin. Radiolymphoscintigraphy also increases the accuracy and efficiency of the SLN harvest by providing a directed dissection to the level of the nodes in the basin. The Neoprobe increases the yield of SLN's, some of which are clinically relevant since they contain metastatic disease.

Objective: To perform a cost analysis of the emerging technology of lymphatic mapping for patients with malignant melanoma.

Design: A retrospective, computer-aided chart and financial cost and charge review of consecutive patients with the diagnosis of melanoma registered at a cancer center from December, 1995 to March, 1996.

Participants: 73 consecutive patients with the diagnosis of Stage 1 and 2 melanoma (cutaneous disease only) had nodal staging of their disease with either a sentinel node (SLN) biopsy or an elective complete node dissection (ELND). This was determined largely by patient choice and the protocol in operation at the time of the presentation of the patient to the clinic.

Outcomes measured: There were no deaths in the series. Patient morbidity endpoints included rates of infection, incidence of extremity lymphedema, development of a seroma in the regional nodal basin wound and wound healing. Clinical outcome was measured by the ability to obtain complete nodal staging information with the new lymphatic mapping technology, and recurrence rates in the nodal basin after a negative SLN biopsy. Total charges, direct costs and total costs were calculated from all hospital, OR, pathology and lab charges. Professional fees were included in the analysis.

Results: Group 1 patients (50) had melanomas greater than 0.76 mm in thickness treated with a wide local excision (WLE), lymphatic mapping and SLN biopsy under general anesthesia. Five patients (Group 2) had their procedure performed under a straight local anesthesia. Group 3 patients (18) had nodal staging performed with an elective node dissection. In Groups 1 and 2, if the SLN was positive for micrometastases, the patients were taken back to the OR for a complete node dissection. The total charges per patient were $13,835, $6,853 and $19,285, respectively. Significant dollar savings were achieved if the nodal staging could be accomplished with the lymphatic mapping technology (p = 0.001). Morbidity was significantly less in Groups 1 and 2 compared to Group 3. After a mean follow-up of three years, only one patient has recurred in a SLN negative basin.

Conclusions: With 38,300 new cases of melanoma diagnosed each year in the United States, a projected savings of $172 million per year (general anesthesia) and $350 million per year (local anesthesia) could be realized if this new mapping technology could be incorporated into the care of the melanoma patient. Patient morbidity is minimized, nodal staging is complete and patients return to work sooner. Recently approved adjuvant therapy can be applied in a selective fashion, treating only those patients in which a documented benefit has been obtained, saving the health care system more dollars. Initial investment in defining the technology was minimal.

Interferon alfa-2b has recently been approved by the FDA as the first effective adjuvant therapy for the treatment of the "high risk for recurrence" melanoma patient. In a landmark study (ECOG 1684), the use of high dose Interferon alfa-2b for one year in melanoma patients with either deep primary melanomas or resected nodal metastases resulted in significant increases in overall survival (p = 0.04) and disease-free survival (p < 0.01) compared to the control, observation arm. If one considers only those patients with nodal metastases (89% of the study population) the survival benefit associated with adjuvant Interferon alfa-2b had a p value of 0.008. This survival benefit is on par with the survival benefit experienced with the adjuvant therapy of either breast or colon cancer. Because of the survival benefit associated with the adjuvant therapy, one could argue that any melanoma patient with a significant risk of nodal metastases (tumor thickness greater than 1.0 mm) should have a nodal staging procedure. Lymphatic mapping and sentinel node biopsy techniques are the least morbid and costly method to obtain this information. By performing nodal staging on patients with melanomas greater than 1.0 mm in thickness, effective adjuvant therapy can be applied in a selective fashion, exposing only those patients who have the most to benefit to the toxicities of the therapy.