This study examines recent trends in the expenses and fees of mutual funds. Expense ratios of equity, bond, and hybrid funds declined in 2012 owing to reductions in the expense ratios of individual funds, an increase in the demand for index funds, and a continuing shift by investors in both actively managed and index funds toward lower-cost funds. Expense ratios of money market funds declined sharply as assets migrated toward lower-cost funds and funds continued to waive large portions of expenses. Waiving expenses helps offset the effects of the current low interest rate environment on a fund’s net yield. Expense ratios of target date mutual funds were 58 basis points in 2012, down from 67 basis points in 2008. Two factors likely played a role. First, assets in target date mutual funds have tripled since 2008, lowering fund expense ratios through economies of scale. Second, a greater concentration of assets in lower-cost target date mutual funds pushed down the average expenses of these funds.
{"title":"ICI Research Perspective: Trends in the Expenses and Fees of Mutual Funds, 2012","authors":"Emily Gallagher","doi":"10.2139/SSRN.2251479","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.2139/SSRN.2251479","url":null,"abstract":"This study examines recent trends in the expenses and fees of mutual funds. Expense ratios of equity, bond, and hybrid funds declined in 2012 owing to reductions in the expense ratios of individual funds, an increase in the demand for index funds, and a continuing shift by investors in both actively managed and index funds toward lower-cost funds. Expense ratios of money market funds declined sharply as assets migrated toward lower-cost funds and funds continued to waive large portions of expenses. Waiving expenses helps offset the effects of the current low interest rate environment on a fund’s net yield. Expense ratios of target date mutual funds were 58 basis points in 2012, down from 67 basis points in 2008. Two factors likely played a role. First, assets in target date mutual funds have tripled since 2008, lowering fund expense ratios through economies of scale. Second, a greater concentration of assets in lower-cost target date mutual funds pushed down the average expenses of these funds.","PeriodicalId":76903,"journal":{"name":"Employee benefits journal","volume":"10 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2013-04-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"86539969","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
This paper studies the impact of income taxes on intensive and extensive labor supply decisions for older workers. The literature provides little evidence about the responsiveness of the older population to tax incentives, though the tax code is a potentially important mechanism for affecting retirement behavior. We estimate the intensive and extensive margins jointly with a new approach accounting for selection into labor force participation. On the extensive margin, we find substantial effects of income taxes on labor force participation and retirement decisions, estimating participation elasticities with respect to after-tax labor income of 0.76 for women and 0.55 for men. About half of the magnitude of these labor force participation elasticities are associated with tax-driven reductions in retirement. We find statistically insignificant compensated elasticities on the intensive margin. We simulate the effects on labor supply of two possible age-targeted tax reforms. We find that eliminating the employee portion of the payroll tax at age 65 would decrease the percentage of workers exiting the labor force by 6-7%. An EITC expansion which extends the tax credit to older ages (irrespective of their number of dependents) would decrease the probability that workers exit the labor force by 3 percentage points for men and by 6 percentage points for women, reductions of 11% and 23% from baseline rates.
{"title":"Estimating Intensive and Extensive Tax Responsiveness: Do Older Workers Respond to Income Taxes?","authors":"Abby E. Alpert, David Powell","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.2188401","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2188401","url":null,"abstract":"This paper studies the impact of income taxes on intensive and extensive labor supply decisions for older workers. The literature provides little evidence about the responsiveness of the older population to tax incentives, though the tax code is a potentially important mechanism for affecting retirement behavior. We estimate the intensive and extensive margins jointly with a new approach accounting for selection into labor force participation. On the extensive margin, we find substantial effects of income taxes on labor force participation and retirement decisions, estimating participation elasticities with respect to after-tax labor income of 0.76 for women and 0.55 for men. About half of the magnitude of these labor force participation elasticities are associated with tax-driven reductions in retirement. We find statistically insignificant compensated elasticities on the intensive margin. We simulate the effects on labor supply of two possible age-targeted tax reforms. We find that eliminating the employee portion of the payroll tax at age 65 would decrease the percentage of workers exiting the labor force by 6-7%. An EITC expansion which extends the tax credit to older ages (irrespective of their number of dependents) would decrease the probability that workers exit the labor force by 3 percentage points for men and by 6 percentage points for women, reductions of 11% and 23% from baseline rates.","PeriodicalId":76903,"journal":{"name":"Employee benefits journal","volume":"37 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2013-04-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"77843797","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
This paper examines the SEC regulation requiring non-binding general shareholder vote on executive compensation–“say-on-pay” (SOP). We examine the first two years of SOP in the Russell 3000. The results confirm previous shareholder-proposal studies by finding that SOP approval (reject) votes are associated with: higher (lower) ROA, higher (lower) returns, lower (higher) institutional ownership and lower (higher) CEO compensation. We also find that approval (reject) SOP votes firms have: lower (higher) volatility, lower (higher) excessive compensation and lower (higher) abnormal accruals. We find some evidence to suggest that the effect of institutional ownership is less in 2012 than in 2011. This study contributes to the literature in three ways. First, we find evidence that SOP votes are sensitive to firm risk, excessive CEO compensation, accounting quality and financial performance. Second, we find that Boards react to SOP rejection votes by subsequently reducing the level of excessive compensation. Third, our results present evidence to suggest that shareholder voting rights -even when non-binding- could be an effective mechanism of corporate governance that addresses the problem of incomplete contracts and management rent extraction.
{"title":"Shareholders Have a Say in Executive Compensation: Evidence from Say-on-Pay in the United States","authors":"M. Kimbro, D. Xu","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.2209936","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2209936","url":null,"abstract":"This paper examines the SEC regulation requiring non-binding general shareholder vote on executive compensation–“say-on-pay” (SOP). We examine the first two years of SOP in the Russell 3000. The results confirm previous shareholder-proposal studies by finding that SOP approval (reject) votes are associated with: higher (lower) ROA, higher (lower) returns, lower (higher) institutional ownership and lower (higher) CEO compensation. We also find that approval (reject) SOP votes firms have: lower (higher) volatility, lower (higher) excessive compensation and lower (higher) abnormal accruals. We find some evidence to suggest that the effect of institutional ownership is less in 2012 than in 2011. This study contributes to the literature in three ways. First, we find evidence that SOP votes are sensitive to firm risk, excessive CEO compensation, accounting quality and financial performance. Second, we find that Boards react to SOP rejection votes by subsequently reducing the level of excessive compensation. Third, our results present evidence to suggest that shareholder voting rights -even when non-binding- could be an effective mechanism of corporate governance that addresses the problem of incomplete contracts and management rent extraction.","PeriodicalId":76903,"journal":{"name":"Employee benefits journal","volume":"39 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2013-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"79944789","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Although there is substantial functional limitation and disability among veterans of all ages, relatively little is known about veterans’ uptake of Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) Disability Benefits and Social Security Disability Insurance (DI). This project uses data from the 1992, 1993, 1996, 2001, 2004, and 2008 Survey of Income and Program Participation to examine veterans’ participation in VA and DI programs. The results indicate that the majority of veterans do not receive VA or DI benefits, but veterans’ use of these programs has been increasing over time. A higher percentage of veterans receive VA compensation only, which ranges from 4.9 percent in 1992 to 13.2 percent in 2008, than DI compensation only, which ranges from 2.9 percent in 1992 to 6.7 percent in 2008. Furthermore, the rate of joint participation in these two programs is low, ranging from less than 1 percent in 1992 to 3.6 percent in 2008. Veterans experience relatively few within-panel transitions between VA and DI programs. Overall, the likelihood of any disability program use is higher among veterans who served during multiple time periods, are older, black or Hispanic, currently married, and have less than a high school education. Among users, the likelihood of any VA use in contrast to only DI use is higher among veterans who served since 1990, are younger, Hispanic, highly educated, and currently married. Among users, variation in the likelihood of any DI use relative to only VA use generally mirrors variation in the likelihood of any VA use, although there are differences in associations with race/ethnicity, education, and marital status.
{"title":"The Use of VA Disability Benefits and Social Security Disability Insurance Among Veterans","authors":"J. Wilmoth, A. London, C. Heflin","doi":"10.2139/SSRN.2222771","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.2139/SSRN.2222771","url":null,"abstract":"Although there is substantial functional limitation and disability among veterans of all ages, relatively little is known about veterans’ uptake of Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) Disability Benefits and Social Security Disability Insurance (DI). This project uses data from the 1992, 1993, 1996, 2001, 2004, and 2008 Survey of Income and Program Participation to examine veterans’ participation in VA and DI programs. The results indicate that the majority of veterans do not receive VA or DI benefits, but veterans’ use of these programs has been increasing over time. A higher percentage of veterans receive VA compensation only, which ranges from 4.9 percent in 1992 to 13.2 percent in 2008, than DI compensation only, which ranges from 2.9 percent in 1992 to 6.7 percent in 2008. Furthermore, the rate of joint participation in these two programs is low, ranging from less than 1 percent in 1992 to 3.6 percent in 2008. Veterans experience relatively few within-panel transitions between VA and DI programs. Overall, the likelihood of any disability program use is higher among veterans who served during multiple time periods, are older, black or Hispanic, currently married, and have less than a high school education. Among users, the likelihood of any VA use in contrast to only DI use is higher among veterans who served since 1990, are younger, Hispanic, highly educated, and currently married. Among users, variation in the likelihood of any DI use relative to only VA use generally mirrors variation in the likelihood of any VA use, although there are differences in associations with race/ethnicity, education, and marital status.","PeriodicalId":76903,"journal":{"name":"Employee benefits journal","volume":"12 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2013-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"74907882","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
The U. S. economy experienced a shift away from employment with coverage under a defined benefit (DB) pension plan during 1991-2009. Defined contribution (DC) plan coverage seems not to have risen much, if at all, for married men in the recent decade. Overall, the percent of the labor force covered by any pension type fell over the period 2001-2009, with most of the shift occurring in 2001-2003, as indicated by data from the Panel Study of Income Dynamics (PSID). We seek to determine the factors that lead families to lose or gain DC coverage and to put money into their private pensions or to draw money out of private pensions and annuities prior to age 65. The importance of such discretionary participation and savings responses is accentuated by both the presence of DC pensions, and, presumably, learning that such pensions can be used to stabilize finances prior to retirement. Besides the impact of the overall economic climate, individual, family level events and cash flow changes are expected to play a role in the decision to add to or withdraw from a DC pension plan. Preliminary studies suggest that the savings response by households to recent economic uncertainties during 2009-2011, was greater overall savings and an increase in liquid asset holding, a result consistent with classic predictions of a response to economic turmoil. Overall, pension fund inflows have not been a part of the increase in private saving in the Great Recession.
{"title":"At the Corner of Main and Wall Street: Family Pension Responses to Liquidity Change and Perceived Returns","authors":"Thomas Bridges, F. Stafford","doi":"10.2139/SSRN.2208568","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.2139/SSRN.2208568","url":null,"abstract":"The U. S. economy experienced a shift away from employment with coverage under a defined benefit (DB) pension plan during 1991-2009. Defined contribution (DC) plan coverage seems not to have risen much, if at all, for married men in the recent decade. Overall, the percent of the labor force covered by any pension type fell over the period 2001-2009, with most of the shift occurring in 2001-2003, as indicated by data from the Panel Study of Income Dynamics (PSID). We seek to determine the factors that lead families to lose or gain DC coverage and to put money into their private pensions or to draw money out of private pensions and annuities prior to age 65. The importance of such discretionary participation and savings responses is accentuated by both the presence of DC pensions, and, presumably, learning that such pensions can be used to stabilize finances prior to retirement. Besides the impact of the overall economic climate, individual, family level events and cash flow changes are expected to play a role in the decision to add to or withdraw from a DC pension plan. Preliminary studies suggest that the savings response by households to recent economic uncertainties during 2009-2011, was greater overall savings and an increase in liquid asset holding, a result consistent with classic predictions of a response to economic turmoil. Overall, pension fund inflows have not been a part of the increase in private saving in the Great Recession.","PeriodicalId":76903,"journal":{"name":"Employee benefits journal","volume":"4 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2012-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"90969358","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2012-11-18DOI: 10.1016/J.JCPS.2012.10.012
Margaret C. Campbell, Gina S. Mohr, P. Verlegh
{"title":"Can Disclosures Lead Consumers to Resist Covert Persuasion? The Important Roles of Disclosure Timing and Type of Response","authors":"Margaret C. Campbell, Gina S. Mohr, P. Verlegh","doi":"10.1016/J.JCPS.2012.10.012","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1016/J.JCPS.2012.10.012","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":76903,"journal":{"name":"Employee benefits journal","volume":"6 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2012-11-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"83616868","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
This paper examines the labor market for CEOs in the financial sector from 1988 to 2007, using a new hand-collected sample of 1,655 CEO successions. We document that there is a significant role of outside successions, as about one out of two successions involves an outside hire. In addition, using difference-in-differences estimates, we study the link between the labor market for finance CEOs and firm performance. We document that (1) there is a large performance gap between inside and outside successions, as outside successions are followed by significantly larger improvements in firm performance; (2) the performance gap between outside and inside successions is larger for firms with an insider dominated board of directors; (3) the performance gap widened after an important deregulation event (the 1999 Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act). These results are robust to using a battery of firm performance measures (short-run and long-run stock market returns, and several long-run operating performance measures) and a matched sample approach to address selection issues. Overall, our findings suggest that managerial human capital is very valuable in the financial industry, and weak internal governance hurts firm performance by limiting the scope of labor market competition.
{"title":"CEO Successions and Firm Performance in the US Financial Industry","authors":"Antonio Falato, Dalida Kadyrzhanova","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.2197497","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2197497","url":null,"abstract":"This paper examines the labor market for CEOs in the financial sector from 1988 to 2007, using a new hand-collected sample of 1,655 CEO successions. We document that there is a significant role of outside successions, as about one out of two successions involves an outside hire. In addition, using difference-in-differences estimates, we study the link between the labor market for finance CEOs and firm performance. We document that (1) there is a large performance gap between inside and outside successions, as outside successions are followed by significantly larger improvements in firm performance; (2) the performance gap between outside and inside successions is larger for firms with an insider dominated board of directors; (3) the performance gap widened after an important deregulation event (the 1999 Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act). These results are robust to using a battery of firm performance measures (short-run and long-run stock market returns, and several long-run operating performance measures) and a matched sample approach to address selection issues. Overall, our findings suggest that managerial human capital is very valuable in the financial industry, and weak internal governance hurts firm performance by limiting the scope of labor market competition.","PeriodicalId":76903,"journal":{"name":"Employee benefits journal","volume":"22 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2012-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"83785565","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2012-10-24DOI: 10.4236/HEALTH.2012.412192
Aparna Mathur
Using household-level data from the Panel Study of Income Dynamics, we estimate the extent to which medical expenses are responsible for driving households to bankruptcy. Our results suggest that an increase of 10 percent in medical debts would cause a 27 percent increase in the filing propensity of households with primarily medical debt, and an approximately 36 percent increase in filing propensity of households where medical debts co-exist with primarily credit card debts. Studying the post-bankruptcy scenario, we find that filers are 19 percent less likely to own a home even several years after the filing, compared to non-filers. However, the consequences are less adverse for medical filers i.e. those who filed due to high medical bills compared to other filers.
{"title":"Health Expenditures and Personal Bankruptcies","authors":"Aparna Mathur","doi":"10.4236/HEALTH.2012.412192","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.4236/HEALTH.2012.412192","url":null,"abstract":"Using household-level data from the Panel Study of Income Dynamics, we estimate the extent to which medical expenses are responsible for driving households to bankruptcy. Our results suggest that an increase of 10 percent in medical debts would cause a 27 percent increase in the filing propensity of households with primarily medical debt, and an approximately 36 percent increase in filing propensity of households where medical debts co-exist with primarily credit card debts. Studying the post-bankruptcy scenario, we find that filers are 19 percent less likely to own a home even several years after the filing, compared to non-filers. However, the consequences are less adverse for medical filers i.e. those who filed due to high medical bills compared to other filers.","PeriodicalId":76903,"journal":{"name":"Employee benefits journal","volume":"21 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2012-10-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"82618908","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2012-10-01DOI: 10.1016/J.JPUBECO.2013.05.005
R. Clark, M. Morrill, David Vanderweide
{"title":"Defined Benefit Pension Plan Distribution Decisions by Public Sector Employees","authors":"R. Clark, M. Morrill, David Vanderweide","doi":"10.1016/J.JPUBECO.2013.05.005","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1016/J.JPUBECO.2013.05.005","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":76903,"journal":{"name":"Employee benefits journal","volume":"18 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2012-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"77184286","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
We analyze the three components of active management (asset allocation, market timing and security selection) in the net performance of U.S. pension funds and relate these to fund size and the liquidity of the investments. On average, the funds in our sample have an annual net alpha of 89 basis points that is evenly distributed across the asset allocation, market timing, and security selection components. Stock momentum fully explains the positive alpha in security selection, whereas “time series momentum” drives market timing. While larger pension funds have lower investment costs, this does not lead to better net performance. Rather, all three components of active management exhibit substantial diseconomies of scale directly related to illiquidity. Our results suggest that especially the larger pension funds would have done better if they invested more in passive mandates without frequent rebalancing across asset classes.
{"title":"Can Large Pension Funds Beat the Market? Asset Allocation, Market Timing, Security Selection and the Limits of Liquidity","authors":"A. Andonov, Rob Bauer, M. Cremers","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.1885536","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1885536","url":null,"abstract":"We analyze the three components of active management (asset allocation, market timing and security selection) in the net performance of U.S. pension funds and relate these to fund size and the liquidity of the investments. On average, the funds in our sample have an annual net alpha of 89 basis points that is evenly distributed across the asset allocation, market timing, and security selection components. Stock momentum fully explains the positive alpha in security selection, whereas “time series momentum” drives market timing. While larger pension funds have lower investment costs, this does not lead to better net performance. Rather, all three components of active management exhibit substantial diseconomies of scale directly related to illiquidity. Our results suggest that especially the larger pension funds would have done better if they invested more in passive mandates without frequent rebalancing across asset classes.","PeriodicalId":76903,"journal":{"name":"Employee benefits journal","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2012-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"79898116","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
京公网安备 11010802042870号
京ICP备2023020795号-1
扫码关注我们
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：