In response to continued pressure on the Canadian healthcare system, hospitals are implementing structural changes to address issues of cost containment, utilization, and resource allocation. One strategy has been to decentralize managerial decision making to clinicians, creating "clinician-managers" (CMs). We surveyed 3,000 hospital-based CMs in Ontario, Canada (including physicians, nurses, and other health professionals), in order to understand the nature and frequency of the ethical issues they face as a consequence of their involvement in resource allocation decisions, and to identify mechanisms for dealing with these problems in their hospitals. Based on the survey results, we developed a Management Ethics Framework to assist CMs to reach an ethically justifiable resolution of these types of problems, both individually, and in the context of their membership in the healthcare team. The results, and particularly the discussion that follows, represent a confluence of philosophical, clinical, and organizational perspective on ethics and resource allocation by clinicians.
{"title":"An ethics framework for assisting clinician-managers in resource allocation decision making.","authors":"E M Meslin, L Lemieux-Charles, J T Wortley","doi":"","DOIUrl":"","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>In response to continued pressure on the Canadian healthcare system, hospitals are implementing structural changes to address issues of cost containment, utilization, and resource allocation. One strategy has been to decentralize managerial decision making to clinicians, creating \"clinician-managers\" (CMs). We surveyed 3,000 hospital-based CMs in Ontario, Canada (including physicians, nurses, and other health professionals), in order to understand the nature and frequency of the ethical issues they face as a consequence of their involvement in resource allocation decisions, and to identify mechanisms for dealing with these problems in their hospitals. Based on the survey results, we developed a Management Ethics Framework to assist CMs to reach an ethically justifiable resolution of these types of problems, both individually, and in the context of their membership in the healthcare team. The results, and particularly the discussion that follows, represent a confluence of philosophical, clinical, and organizational perspective on ethics and resource allocation by clinicians.</p>","PeriodicalId":77163,"journal":{"name":"Hospital & health services administration","volume":"42 1","pages":"33-48"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"1997-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"21037454","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
In this article, we investigate the relationship between hospital length-of-stay (LOS) and quality of care. We use hospital claims records from Medicare beneficiaries in Michigan to estimate condition-specific models for predicting patients' LOSs. With these models and a data set provided by Michigan Peer Review Organization, Inc. (MPRO), each patient's risk-adjusted LOS is then linked to a quality-of-care judgment (good care, poor care) from physician peer reviewers. LOS is a widely used indicator of hospital performance. Most commonly, it is viewed as an indicator of hospital efficiency and as a surrogate measure for costs, with hospitals having long average LOSs considered relatively inefficient in the use of resources and those with low LOSs considered to be efficient. Sometimes, however, LOS is assumed to relate to quality. For example, if hospitals were to respond to the financial incentives of prospective payment by attempting to lower costs by prematurely discharging patients, LOSs significantly lower than expected might be considered indicative of poor quality care. On the other hand, if poor quality of care causes complications, it would tend to extend LOSs. Under this assumption, longer than expected LOSs could be viewed as indicative of poor quality care. This article shows that in every one of the 13 clinical conditions examined, cases that received poor quality care had significantly longer risk-adjusted LOSs than cases whose care was of acceptable quality.
{"title":"Is patient length of stay related to quality of care?","authors":"J W Thomas, K E Guire, G G Horvat","doi":"","DOIUrl":"","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>In this article, we investigate the relationship between hospital length-of-stay (LOS) and quality of care. We use hospital claims records from Medicare beneficiaries in Michigan to estimate condition-specific models for predicting patients' LOSs. With these models and a data set provided by Michigan Peer Review Organization, Inc. (MPRO), each patient's risk-adjusted LOS is then linked to a quality-of-care judgment (good care, poor care) from physician peer reviewers. LOS is a widely used indicator of hospital performance. Most commonly, it is viewed as an indicator of hospital efficiency and as a surrogate measure for costs, with hospitals having long average LOSs considered relatively inefficient in the use of resources and those with low LOSs considered to be efficient. Sometimes, however, LOS is assumed to relate to quality. For example, if hospitals were to respond to the financial incentives of prospective payment by attempting to lower costs by prematurely discharging patients, LOSs significantly lower than expected might be considered indicative of poor quality care. On the other hand, if poor quality of care causes complications, it would tend to extend LOSs. Under this assumption, longer than expected LOSs could be viewed as indicative of poor quality care. This article shows that in every one of the 13 clinical conditions examined, cases that received poor quality care had significantly longer risk-adjusted LOSs than cases whose care was of acceptable quality.</p>","PeriodicalId":77163,"journal":{"name":"Hospital & health services administration","volume":"42 4","pages":"489-507"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"1997-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"21045434","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Under pressure to remain competitive in the rapidly changing healthcare industry, policy leaders and healthcare administrators face the challenge of resolving antitrust matters arising from the creation of innovative healthcare provider affiliations. Although guidance from the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) is available, development of new affiliations is hindered due to contradictory rulings and ambiguous guidelines. Provider associations are further disadvantaged by a federal act granting insurance companies antitrust exemption, which enables insurance companies to affiliate more easily. Current antitrust regulations create unequal market powers, resulting in the development of inefficient systems. Softening antitrust laws in favor of provider-sponsored healthcare affiliations will provide for the flexibility necessary for effective healthcare reform.
{"title":"Antitrust and affiliations among healthcare providers: the need for a level playing field.","authors":"A Heightchew","doi":"","DOIUrl":"","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Under pressure to remain competitive in the rapidly changing healthcare industry, policy leaders and healthcare administrators face the challenge of resolving antitrust matters arising from the creation of innovative healthcare provider affiliations. Although guidance from the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) is available, development of new affiliations is hindered due to contradictory rulings and ambiguous guidelines. Provider associations are further disadvantaged by a federal act granting insurance companies antitrust exemption, which enables insurance companies to affiliate more easily. Current antitrust regulations create unequal market powers, resulting in the development of inefficient systems. Softening antitrust laws in favor of provider-sponsored healthcare affiliations will provide for the flexibility necessary for effective healthcare reform.</p>","PeriodicalId":77163,"journal":{"name":"Hospital & health services administration","volume":"42 4","pages":"559-65"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"1997-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"21045438","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
As the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) makes the change over to Veterans Integrated Service Network (VISNs) the need for new and better leadership is warranted if VA wants to not only survive, but thrive in the emerging twenty-first century healthcare system. VA can prepare for the future and meet the challenges facing them by adopting a system of visionary leadership. The use of scenarios and vision techniques are explained as they relate to VA's efforts to move toward their new system of VISNs. The four scenarios provide snapshots of possible futures for the U.S. healthcare system as well as the possible future role and mission of VA--from VA disappearing to its becoming a premier virtual organization.
{"title":"Visionary leadership and the future of VA health system.","authors":"C Bezold, E Mayer, A Dighe","doi":"","DOIUrl":"","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>As the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) makes the change over to Veterans Integrated Service Network (VISNs) the need for new and better leadership is warranted if VA wants to not only survive, but thrive in the emerging twenty-first century healthcare system. VA can prepare for the future and meet the challenges facing them by adopting a system of visionary leadership. The use of scenarios and vision techniques are explained as they relate to VA's efforts to move toward their new system of VISNs. The four scenarios provide snapshots of possible futures for the U.S. healthcare system as well as the possible future role and mission of VA--from VA disappearing to its becoming a premier virtual organization.</p>","PeriodicalId":77163,"journal":{"name":"Hospital & health services administration","volume":"42 3","pages":"367-82"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"1997-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"21041414","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
The continuous quality improvement (CQI) movement, while experiencing great popularity years ago, has been declining in interest across other industries. This article studied American and Canadian hospital executives who have embraced the concept of CQI and will continue to be committed to CQI efforts in the future. Executives of CQI hospitals strongly believe that CQI is not a fad and is essential to their organizations' survival. The majority of the hospital executives in the sample have a good understanding of CQI. The drive to provide quality service to both internal and external customers is the primary motivation for being involved with CQI. Some unsuccessful CQI efforts can be attributed to a lack of CQI skills, poor planning, and insufficient staffing. Close to 90 percent of the respondents expected their involvement with CQI to increase significantly in the future. This result implies that CQI is still being considered and will maintain its role as an effective management tool in the healthcare sector.
{"title":"Continuous quality improvement: a survey of American and Canadian healthcare executives.","authors":"Y C Chan, S J Ho","doi":"","DOIUrl":"","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The continuous quality improvement (CQI) movement, while experiencing great popularity years ago, has been declining in interest across other industries. This article studied American and Canadian hospital executives who have embraced the concept of CQI and will continue to be committed to CQI efforts in the future. Executives of CQI hospitals strongly believe that CQI is not a fad and is essential to their organizations' survival. The majority of the hospital executives in the sample have a good understanding of CQI. The drive to provide quality service to both internal and external customers is the primary motivation for being involved with CQI. Some unsuccessful CQI efforts can be attributed to a lack of CQI skills, poor planning, and insufficient staffing. Close to 90 percent of the respondents expected their involvement with CQI to increase significantly in the future. This result implies that CQI is still being considered and will maintain its role as an effective management tool in the healthcare sector.</p>","PeriodicalId":77163,"journal":{"name":"Hospital & health services administration","volume":"42 4","pages":"525-44"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"1997-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"21045436","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Not-for-profit (NFP) and for-profit (FP) hospitals were compared on several performance indicators including revenues, costs, productivity/efficiency, and profitability. The indicators were adjusted, where appropriate, for outpatient activity and a case-mix index for all patients. FP hospitals had higher profit margins as well as higher gross and net revenues per case-mix adjusted admission. On the other hand, NFP hospitals had lower total cost per case-mix adjusted admission even after subtracting taxes from FP hospital costs. There were no significant differences between the two groups on efficiency and productivity indicators--paid hours per case-mix adjusted admissions, occupancy levels, and case-mix adjusted ALOS. The higher profits of FP hospitals were attributed to revenue management rather than cost and efficiency management.
{"title":"A comparative analysis of revenue and cost-management strategies of not-for-profit and for-profit hospitals.","authors":"R K Shukla, J Pestian, J Clement","doi":"","DOIUrl":"","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Not-for-profit (NFP) and for-profit (FP) hospitals were compared on several performance indicators including revenues, costs, productivity/efficiency, and profitability. The indicators were adjusted, where appropriate, for outpatient activity and a case-mix index for all patients. FP hospitals had higher profit margins as well as higher gross and net revenues per case-mix adjusted admission. On the other hand, NFP hospitals had lower total cost per case-mix adjusted admission even after subtracting taxes from FP hospital costs. There were no significant differences between the two groups on efficiency and productivity indicators--paid hours per case-mix adjusted admissions, occupancy levels, and case-mix adjusted ALOS. The higher profits of FP hospitals were attributed to revenue management rather than cost and efficiency management.</p>","PeriodicalId":77163,"journal":{"name":"Hospital & health services administration","volume":"42 1","pages":"117-34"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"1997-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"21037452","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
As hospitals continue to face intense pressure to control operating costs, many have resorted to staff reductions and other redesign efforts. The remaining employees are frequently asked to do more with less. In these uncertain times, it is important that hospital administrators understand the concept of organizational citizenship behavior (OCB) and attempt to attract and retain those employees capable of exhibiting such behaviors. This study examined the relationships between three organizational commitment components, as well as job satisfaction (including specific facet measures) and two separate forms of OCB. Usefulness analyses indicated that satisfaction with coworkers and affective commitment were the two most important predictors of one dimension of citizenship behavior, as each construct contributed unique variance in the dependent variable. Implications for future research and practice are provided.
{"title":"Organizational citizenship behavior among hospital employees: a multidimensional analysis involving job satisfaction and organizational commitment.","authors":"D S Bolon","doi":"","DOIUrl":"","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>As hospitals continue to face intense pressure to control operating costs, many have resorted to staff reductions and other redesign efforts. The remaining employees are frequently asked to do more with less. In these uncertain times, it is important that hospital administrators understand the concept of organizational citizenship behavior (OCB) and attempt to attract and retain those employees capable of exhibiting such behaviors. This study examined the relationships between three organizational commitment components, as well as job satisfaction (including specific facet measures) and two separate forms of OCB. Usefulness analyses indicated that satisfaction with coworkers and affective commitment were the two most important predictors of one dimension of citizenship behavior, as each construct contributed unique variance in the dependent variable. Implications for future research and practice are provided.</p>","PeriodicalId":77163,"journal":{"name":"Hospital & health services administration","volume":"42 2","pages":"221-41"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"1997-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"21039180","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
This article identifies the components that contribute to a healthcare organization's costs in controlling quality. A central tenet of our argument is that at its core, quality is the result of a series of transactions among members of a diverse network. Transaction cost economics is applied internally to analyze intraorganizational transactions that contribute to quality control, and questions for future research are posed.
{"title":"Components of the costs of controlling quality: a transaction cost economics approach.","authors":"R A Stiles, S S Mick","doi":"","DOIUrl":"","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This article identifies the components that contribute to a healthcare organization's costs in controlling quality. A central tenet of our argument is that at its core, quality is the result of a series of transactions among members of a diverse network. Transaction cost economics is applied internally to analyze intraorganizational transactions that contribute to quality control, and questions for future research are posed.</p>","PeriodicalId":77163,"journal":{"name":"Hospital & health services administration","volume":"42 2","pages":"205-19"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"1997-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"21039179","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Customer satisfaction is an important measure of service quality in healthcare organizations. This study investigated the relationship between patient waiting and satisfaction with ambulatory healthcare services, with waiting times divided into segments of the patient-care episode. Two management techniques to alter perceptions of waiting were also examined. Regression models measuring the effect of waiting times on satisfaction found that the total time spent waiting for the clinician was the most significant predictor of patient satisfaction. Informing patients how long their wait would be and being occupied during the wait were also significant predictors of patient satisfaction. These results show that waiting times, even if they cannot be shortened, can be managed more effectively to improve patient satisfaction.
{"title":"Patient satisfaction with ambulatory healthcare services: waiting time and filling time.","authors":"K H Dansky, J Miles","doi":"","DOIUrl":"","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Customer satisfaction is an important measure of service quality in healthcare organizations. This study investigated the relationship between patient waiting and satisfaction with ambulatory healthcare services, with waiting times divided into segments of the patient-care episode. Two management techniques to alter perceptions of waiting were also examined. Regression models measuring the effect of waiting times on satisfaction found that the total time spent waiting for the clinician was the most significant predictor of patient satisfaction. Informing patients how long their wait would be and being occupied during the wait were also significant predictors of patient satisfaction. These results show that waiting times, even if they cannot be shortened, can be managed more effectively to improve patient satisfaction.</p>","PeriodicalId":77163,"journal":{"name":"Hospital & health services administration","volume":"42 2","pages":"165-77"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"1997-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"21039319","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Transformational change interventions often fail or short fall of their intended impact on organizations and systems. One main reason is that these interventions frequently do not strategically address the complex human dynamics of change. This happens despite awareness of and commitment to intervening at this level by top management and change leaders. The wisdom that "systems don't change; people change" is widely acknowledged but inadequately applied. These are exactly the conditions the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) faces in deploying its new Veterans Integrated Services Networks (VISNs). Applying validated behavioral science strategies that address the human side of change will help VA implement VISNs effectively. Six strategies derived from many years of study and practice in the public and private sectors are discussed, along with suggestions for VISN managers about how to implement them.
{"title":"Managing the human side of change in VA's transformation.","authors":"T E Backer","doi":"","DOIUrl":"","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Transformational change interventions often fail or short fall of their intended impact on organizations and systems. One main reason is that these interventions frequently do not strategically address the complex human dynamics of change. This happens despite awareness of and commitment to intervening at this level by top management and change leaders. The wisdom that \"systems don't change; people change\" is widely acknowledged but inadequately applied. These are exactly the conditions the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) faces in deploying its new Veterans Integrated Services Networks (VISNs). Applying validated behavioral science strategies that address the human side of change will help VA implement VISNs effectively. Six strategies derived from many years of study and practice in the public and private sectors are discussed, along with suggestions for VISN managers about how to implement them.</p>","PeriodicalId":77163,"journal":{"name":"Hospital & health services administration","volume":"42 3","pages":"433-59"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"1997-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"21041417","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}