首页 > 最新文献

Journal of public health medicine最新文献

英文 中文
Communicable disease and health protection quarterly review: July-September 2002. From the PHLS Communicable Disease Surveillance Centre. 传染病和卫生保护季度审查:2002年7月至9月。来自PHLS传染病监测中心。
Pub Date : 2003-03-01 DOI: 10.1093/pubmed/fdg016
The Department of Health (DoH) issued new guidance on the management of hepatitis C infected health care workers (HCWs). Previous guidance from the Advisory Group on Hepatitis (AGH) recommended that HCWs infected with hepatitis C should be restricted from undertaking exposure-prone procedures (EPPs) only if they had been associated with transmission of infection to a patient. There have, however, now been five documented incidents in England and Wales in which infected health care workers have transmitted hepatitis C infection to a total of 15 patients during EPPs. As a consequence, it is now recommended that all HCWs who know they carry the hepatitis C virus (i.e. are hepatitis C virus RNA positive) should not perform EPPs. HCWs who are known to have antibodies to hepatitis C virus and who carry out EPPs should be tested for hepatitis C virus RNA. Hepatitis C infected HCWs who have received antiviral treatment and remain hepatitis C virus RNA negative 6 months after cessation of treatment may return to performing EPPs but will require a further check 6 months later to show they remain hepatitis C virus RNA negative. It is also recommended that all HCWs intending to start professional training in a career that relies upon the performance of EPPs should be tested for antibodies for hepatitis C virus before commencing training. Routine testing for hepatitis C of all HCWs who currently perform EPPs is not recommended, but HCWs who perform EPPs and who believe they may have been exposed to hepatitis C are advised to seek professional advice on whether they should be tested. Patient notification exercises are recommended whenever transmission of hepatitis C from an infected HCW to a patient has been identified. Guidance to assist in the implementation of the new arrangements is available online at http://www.doh.gov.uk/hepatitisc/healthcareworkers.htm. The DoH also released the Hepatitis C strategy for England for consultation. This strategy will form the basis of a hepatitis C action plan to be drawn up by the end of the year. The main aims of the strategy are to prevent new cases of hepatitis C infection occurring, to increase testing so as to identify those individuals with chronic infection, to ensure that those who are infected can receive specialist advice and to deliver the appropriate treatment through co-ordinated pathways of patient care. The strategy encourages the offering of hepatitis C testing in a range of clinical settings, including to those attending drug treatment centres. The importance of raising awareness of hepatitis C infection in the general population and increasing the awareness and knowledge amongst primary care health professionals is also stressed. The strategy encourages and promotes the use of Communicable Disease and Health Protection Quarterly Review: July–September 2002
{"title":"Communicable disease and health protection quarterly review: July-September 2002. From the PHLS Communicable Disease Surveillance Centre.","authors":"","doi":"10.1093/pubmed/fdg016","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1093/pubmed/fdg016","url":null,"abstract":"The Department of Health (DoH) issued new guidance on the management of hepatitis C infected health care workers (HCWs). Previous guidance from the Advisory Group on Hepatitis (AGH) recommended that HCWs infected with hepatitis C should be restricted from undertaking exposure-prone procedures (EPPs) only if they had been associated with transmission of infection to a patient. There have, however, now been five documented incidents in England and Wales in which infected health care workers have transmitted hepatitis C infection to a total of 15 patients during EPPs. As a consequence, it is now recommended that all HCWs who know they carry the hepatitis C virus (i.e. are hepatitis C virus RNA positive) should not perform EPPs. HCWs who are known to have antibodies to hepatitis C virus and who carry out EPPs should be tested for hepatitis C virus RNA. Hepatitis C infected HCWs who have received antiviral treatment and remain hepatitis C virus RNA negative 6 months after cessation of treatment may return to performing EPPs but will require a further check 6 months later to show they remain hepatitis C virus RNA negative. It is also recommended that all HCWs intending to start professional training in a career that relies upon the performance of EPPs should be tested for antibodies for hepatitis C virus before commencing training. Routine testing for hepatitis C of all HCWs who currently perform EPPs is not recommended, but HCWs who perform EPPs and who believe they may have been exposed to hepatitis C are advised to seek professional advice on whether they should be tested. Patient notification exercises are recommended whenever transmission of hepatitis C from an infected HCW to a patient has been identified. Guidance to assist in the implementation of the new arrangements is available online at http://www.doh.gov.uk/hepatitisc/healthcareworkers.htm. The DoH also released the Hepatitis C strategy for England for consultation. This strategy will form the basis of a hepatitis C action plan to be drawn up by the end of the year. The main aims of the strategy are to prevent new cases of hepatitis C infection occurring, to increase testing so as to identify those individuals with chronic infection, to ensure that those who are infected can receive specialist advice and to deliver the appropriate treatment through co-ordinated pathways of patient care. The strategy encourages the offering of hepatitis C testing in a range of clinical settings, including to those attending drug treatment centres. The importance of raising awareness of hepatitis C infection in the general population and increasing the awareness and knowledge amongst primary care health professionals is also stressed. The strategy encourages and promotes the use of Communicable Disease and Health Protection Quarterly Review: July–September 2002","PeriodicalId":77224,"journal":{"name":"Journal of public health medicine","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2003-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1093/pubmed/fdg016","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"22318523","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Putting the quality into quality-adjusted life years. 将质量投入质量调整寿命年。
Pub Date : 2003-03-01 DOI: 10.1093/pubmed/fdg003
Adam Oliver

Over recent decades, a great deal of effort has been devoted towards developing instruments that can be used to elicit health state values. All of these instruments are conceptually very different from one another and all suffer from serious inherent biases. In this paper I outline the conceptual foundations and empirical limitations of the three principal health state value elicitation instruments. Given that the conceptual parameters internalized within an instrument influence the elicited health state values, I argue that it is necessary to attain a broad agreement on what the appropriate parameters ought to be. When the appropriate conceptual parameters have been identified we will be in a position to develop the methodology of a single standardized instrument.

近几十年来,在开发可用于得出健康状态值的工具方面作出了大量努力。所有这些工具在概念上都非常不同,并且都存在严重的固有偏见。在本文中,我概述了三个主要的健康状态价值引出工具的概念基础和经验局限性。鉴于工具内化的概念参数影响得出的健康状态值,我认为有必要就适当的参数应该是什么达成广泛的一致意见。在确定了适当的概念参数之后,我们将能够制定一种单一标准化工具的方法。
{"title":"Putting the quality into quality-adjusted life years.","authors":"Adam Oliver","doi":"10.1093/pubmed/fdg003","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1093/pubmed/fdg003","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Over recent decades, a great deal of effort has been devoted towards developing instruments that can be used to elicit health state values. All of these instruments are conceptually very different from one another and all suffer from serious inherent biases. In this paper I outline the conceptual foundations and empirical limitations of the three principal health state value elicitation instruments. Given that the conceptual parameters internalized within an instrument influence the elicited health state values, I argue that it is necessary to attain a broad agreement on what the appropriate parameters ought to be. When the appropriate conceptual parameters have been identified we will be in a position to develop the methodology of a single standardized instrument.</p>","PeriodicalId":77224,"journal":{"name":"Journal of public health medicine","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2003-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1093/pubmed/fdg003","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"22317491","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 11
Is the National Service Framework standard for thrombolytic therapy achievable in a rural area? 国家服务框架溶栓治疗标准在农村地区是否可行?
Pub Date : 2003-03-01 DOI: 10.1093/pubmed/fdg005
Anne-Marie Harney, Rosaleen McClean, John Rawles, David Stewart
The National Service Framework (NSF) for coronary heart disease requires that patients with acute myocardial infarction should start thrombolytic therapy within 60 min of the patient making contact with the National Health Service. In an audit of 700 patients with suspected acute myocardial infarction, patients' first contact was most commonly with a general practitioner (GP) (505/700; 72 per cent), who attended on 88 per cent (446/505) of occasions when they were called. In 93 per cent (255/284) of cases where both GP and an ambulance attended, the GP arrived first, by 25 min (median). In the final audit period, median call-to-thrombolysis time was 90 min (26 per cent < or = 60). We conclude that with existing physical and personnel resources in this semi-rural area of Northern Ireland, the NSF standard for thrombolytic treatment is unlikely to be met in a majority of cases unless GPs adopt prehospital thrombolysis.
冠心病国家服务框架(NSF)要求急性心肌梗死患者在与国家卫生服务机构联系后60分钟内开始溶栓治疗。在对700例疑似急性心肌梗死患者的审计中,患者的第一次接触最常见的是全科医生(GP) (505/700;72%),当他们被召唤时,他们出席了88%(446/505)的场合。在93%(255/284)的全科医生和救护车都来的病例中,全科医生首先到达,平均25分钟(中位数)。在最后的审计期间,呼叫到溶栓的中位时间为90分钟(26% <或= 60分钟)。我们的结论是,在北爱尔兰这个半农村地区,现有的物质和人力资源,除非全科医生采用院前溶栓治疗,否则大多数情况下不太可能达到NSF溶栓治疗的标准。
{"title":"Is the National Service Framework standard for thrombolytic therapy achievable in a rural area?","authors":"Anne-Marie Harney,&nbsp;Rosaleen McClean,&nbsp;John Rawles,&nbsp;David Stewart","doi":"10.1093/pubmed/fdg005","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1093/pubmed/fdg005","url":null,"abstract":"The National Service Framework (NSF) for coronary heart disease requires that patients with acute myocardial infarction should start thrombolytic therapy within 60 min of the patient making contact with the National Health Service. In an audit of 700 patients with suspected acute myocardial infarction, patients' first contact was most commonly with a general practitioner (GP) (505/700; 72 per cent), who attended on 88 per cent (446/505) of occasions when they were called. In 93 per cent (255/284) of cases where both GP and an ambulance attended, the GP arrived first, by 25 min (median). In the final audit period, median call-to-thrombolysis time was 90 min (26 per cent < or = 60). We conclude that with existing physical and personnel resources in this semi-rural area of Northern Ireland, the NSF standard for thrombolytic treatment is unlikely to be met in a majority of cases unless GPs adopt prehospital thrombolysis.","PeriodicalId":77224,"journal":{"name":"Journal of public health medicine","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2003-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1093/pubmed/fdg005","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"22317493","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1
Active life expectancy in people with and without diabetes. 糖尿病患者和非糖尿病患者的预期寿命。
Pub Date : 2003-03-01 DOI: 10.1093/pubmed/fdg009
Carol Jagger, Elizabeth Goyder, Michael Clarke, Nicolas Brouard, Antony Arthur

Background: The aim of the study was to investigate the feasibility of monitoring older people's health by measuring active life expectancy among older people with and without diabetes using routinely collected primary care data.

Methods: The study comprised the first five rounds of a routine health assessment of those aged 75 years and over belonging to a large Midlands general practice (list size 32,500). A nurse carried out the health assessments in the participant's home. Being active was defined as the ability to perform (without difficulty, help or use of aids) at least six of seven activities of daily living (ADLs). Mortality data were collected through the practice register together with regular linkage to information from the Office for National Statistics. Period health expectancies were calculated for those known or found to be diabetic through the health assessments and for non-diabetic individuals.

Results: Calculation of active life expectancies (ALE) was based on 2,474 persons (212 with and 2,262 without diabetes). At all ages, people with diabetes had lower life expectancy and spent fewer years active. The proportion of remaining life spent active was, however, similar for both groups at younger ages, but by age 85 years people with diabetes spent only 32 per cent of remaining life active compared with 42 per cent for those without diabetes.

Conclusion: Annual health assessments of the over-75s in primary care together with linkage to mortality data provide a feasible method of monitoring older people's health, particularly for subgroups at greater risk of disability. At Strategic Health Authority or Primary Care Trust level these methods can monitor health needs, highlight health inequalities and evaluate intervention strategies.

背景:本研究的目的是利用常规收集的初级保健数据,通过测量有和没有糖尿病的老年人的积极预期寿命来监测老年人健康的可行性。方法:该研究包括对米德兰兹一家大型全科诊所(名单大小为32,500人)的75岁及以上老年人进行的前五轮常规健康评估。一名护士在参与者家中进行了健康评估。活跃被定义为能够(在没有困难、帮助或使用辅助工具的情况下)进行至少七项日常生活活动(adl)中的六项。死亡率数据是通过执业登记册收集的,并定期与国家统计局的信息联系。通过健康评估计算了已知或发现患有糖尿病的人和非糖尿病个体的健康预期。结果:对2474人(212人患有糖尿病,2262人没有糖尿病)进行了有效预期寿命(ALE)的计算。在所有年龄段,糖尿病患者的预期寿命都较低,运动时间也较少。然而,两组在年轻时的剩余生命中运动的比例是相似的,但到85岁时,糖尿病患者只有32%的剩余生命是运动的,而非糖尿病患者的这一比例为42%。结论:对初级保健中75岁以上老年人的年度健康评估以及与死亡率数据的联系提供了一种监测老年人健康的可行方法,特别是对残疾风险较大的亚群体。在战略卫生局或初级保健信托一级,这些方法可以监测卫生需求,突出卫生不平等现象并评估干预战略。
{"title":"Active life expectancy in people with and without diabetes.","authors":"Carol Jagger,&nbsp;Elizabeth Goyder,&nbsp;Michael Clarke,&nbsp;Nicolas Brouard,&nbsp;Antony Arthur","doi":"10.1093/pubmed/fdg009","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1093/pubmed/fdg009","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The aim of the study was to investigate the feasibility of monitoring older people's health by measuring active life expectancy among older people with and without diabetes using routinely collected primary care data.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The study comprised the first five rounds of a routine health assessment of those aged 75 years and over belonging to a large Midlands general practice (list size 32,500). A nurse carried out the health assessments in the participant's home. Being active was defined as the ability to perform (without difficulty, help or use of aids) at least six of seven activities of daily living (ADLs). Mortality data were collected through the practice register together with regular linkage to information from the Office for National Statistics. Period health expectancies were calculated for those known or found to be diabetic through the health assessments and for non-diabetic individuals.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Calculation of active life expectancies (ALE) was based on 2,474 persons (212 with and 2,262 without diabetes). At all ages, people with diabetes had lower life expectancy and spent fewer years active. The proportion of remaining life spent active was, however, similar for both groups at younger ages, but by age 85 years people with diabetes spent only 32 per cent of remaining life active compared with 42 per cent for those without diabetes.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Annual health assessments of the over-75s in primary care together with linkage to mortality data provide a feasible method of monitoring older people's health, particularly for subgroups at greater risk of disability. At Strategic Health Authority or Primary Care Trust level these methods can monitor health needs, highlight health inequalities and evaluate intervention strategies.</p>","PeriodicalId":77224,"journal":{"name":"Journal of public health medicine","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2003-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1093/pubmed/fdg009","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"22318516","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 57
Prevalence and management of coronary heart disease in primary care: population-based cross-sectional study using a disease register. 初级保健中冠心病的患病率和管理:使用疾病登记的基于人群的横断面研究
Pub Date : 2003-03-01 DOI: 10.1093/pubmed/fdg007
Kevin Carroll, Azeem Majeed, Caroline Firth, Jeremy Gray

Background: Patients with coronary heart disease are at high risk of further coronary events. Hence, one of the main priorities in the National Service Framework for Coronary Heart Disease strategy is the identification and treatment of patients with pre-existing coronary heart disease. We aimed to determine the prevalence of established coronary heart disease in a large primary care population and to compare the management of risk factors in these patients with the standards given in the National Service Framework.

Methods: A population-based cross-sectional study was carried out using data collected from primary care. Sixty-three general practices (total list size 378,021) in four primary care groups in SW London took part. Data collection was confined to 103,613 patients over 44 years of age. We calculated age- and sex-specific and age-standardized prevalence rates, and age-adjusted relative risks for men and women.

Results: A total of 6,778 patients with coronary heart disease were identified (8 per cent of men and 5 per cent of women over 44 years of age). There was a history of myocardial infarction in 30 per cent (1204/3991) of men and 22 per cent (613/2787) of women (relative risk 1.57; 1.37-1.81). Coronary revascularization procedures had been performed in 27 per cent (1068/3991) of men and 11 per cent (312/2787) of women (2.02; 1.73-2.35). Most patients had been assessed for hypertension (89 per cent (3538/3991) of men; 90 per cent (2500/ 2787) of women), but in many patients blood pressure was poorly controlled (26 per cent (902/3538) of men; 27 per cent (678/2500) of women). Total cholesterol had been recently measured in 51 per cent (2018/3991) of men and 44 per cent (1218/2787) of women and was elevated in 44 per cent (881/ 2018) of men and 59 per cent (716/1218) of women (0.74; 0.69-0.79). Statins were prescribed to 49 per cent (1967/3991) of men and 38 per cent (1064/2787) of women (1.06; 1.00-1.12). Aspirin was prescribed to 65 per cent (2586/3991) of men and 59 per cent (1631/2787) of women (1.08; 1.03-1.14). Beta-blockers were prescribed to 20 per cent (181/913) of men and 15 per cent (72/499) of women with a history of myocardial infarction (1.11; 0.85-1.44).

Conclusions: Most patients with coronary heart disease in primary care were being treated with aspirin but less than half with statins or beta-blockers. More men than women were treated with aspirin and statins, even though women had higher cholesterol levels than men. Men were also more likely to have a confirmed diagnosis and to have undergone a coronary revascularization procedure. There is considerable scope for improving the secondary prevention of coronary heart disease and addressing gender inequalities in primary care.

背景:冠心病患者是进一步发生冠状动脉事件的高危人群。因此,国家冠心病服务框架战略的主要优先事项之一是识别和治疗已存在冠心病的患者。我们的目的是确定大型初级保健人群中已确诊冠心病的患病率,并将这些患者的危险因素管理与国家服务框架中给出的标准进行比较。方法:以人群为基础的横断面研究使用从初级保健收集的数据进行。伦敦西南部四个初级保健组的63名全科医生(总名单大小为378,021)参与了研究。数据收集仅限于44岁以上的103,613例患者。我们计算了年龄、性别和年龄标准化的患病率,以及男性和女性的年龄调整相对风险。结果:总共确定了6,778名冠心病患者(8%的男性和5%的44岁以上的女性)。30%(1204/3991)男性有心肌梗死史,22%(613/2787)女性有心肌梗死史(相对危险度1.57;1.37 - -1.81)。27%的男性(1068/3991)和11%的女性(312/2787)接受了冠状动脉血管重建术(2.02;1.73 - -2.35)。大多数患者被评估为高血压(89%(3538/3991)的男性;90%(2500/ 2787)的女性),但在许多患者中血压控制不良(26%(902/3538)的男性;27%(678/2500)的妇女)。最近,51%(2018/3991)的男性和44%(1218/2787)的女性测量了总胆固醇,44%(881/ 2018)的男性和59%(716/1218)的女性(0.74;0.69 - -0.79)。49%(1967/3991)的男性和38%(1064/2787)的女性(1.06;1.00 - -1.12)。65%(2586/3991)的男性和59%(1631/2787)的女性(1.08;1.03 - -1.14)。20%(181/913)的男性和15%(72/499)的有心肌梗死史的女性服用-受体阻滞剂(1.11;0.85 - -1.44)。结论:大多数冠心病患者在初级保健中接受阿司匹林治疗,但只有不到一半的患者接受他汀类药物或受体阻滞剂治疗。服用阿司匹林和他汀类药物的男性多于女性,尽管女性的胆固醇水平高于男性。男性也更有可能确诊并接受冠状动脉血管重建术。在改善冠心病的二级预防和解决初级保健中的性别不平等问题方面还有相当大的空间。
{"title":"Prevalence and management of coronary heart disease in primary care: population-based cross-sectional study using a disease register.","authors":"Kevin Carroll,&nbsp;Azeem Majeed,&nbsp;Caroline Firth,&nbsp;Jeremy Gray","doi":"10.1093/pubmed/fdg007","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1093/pubmed/fdg007","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Patients with coronary heart disease are at high risk of further coronary events. Hence, one of the main priorities in the National Service Framework for Coronary Heart Disease strategy is the identification and treatment of patients with pre-existing coronary heart disease. We aimed to determine the prevalence of established coronary heart disease in a large primary care population and to compare the management of risk factors in these patients with the standards given in the National Service Framework.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A population-based cross-sectional study was carried out using data collected from primary care. Sixty-three general practices (total list size 378,021) in four primary care groups in SW London took part. Data collection was confined to 103,613 patients over 44 years of age. We calculated age- and sex-specific and age-standardized prevalence rates, and age-adjusted relative risks for men and women.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 6,778 patients with coronary heart disease were identified (8 per cent of men and 5 per cent of women over 44 years of age). There was a history of myocardial infarction in 30 per cent (1204/3991) of men and 22 per cent (613/2787) of women (relative risk 1.57; 1.37-1.81). Coronary revascularization procedures had been performed in 27 per cent (1068/3991) of men and 11 per cent (312/2787) of women (2.02; 1.73-2.35). Most patients had been assessed for hypertension (89 per cent (3538/3991) of men; 90 per cent (2500/ 2787) of women), but in many patients blood pressure was poorly controlled (26 per cent (902/3538) of men; 27 per cent (678/2500) of women). Total cholesterol had been recently measured in 51 per cent (2018/3991) of men and 44 per cent (1218/2787) of women and was elevated in 44 per cent (881/ 2018) of men and 59 per cent (716/1218) of women (0.74; 0.69-0.79). Statins were prescribed to 49 per cent (1967/3991) of men and 38 per cent (1064/2787) of women (1.06; 1.00-1.12). Aspirin was prescribed to 65 per cent (2586/3991) of men and 59 per cent (1631/2787) of women (1.08; 1.03-1.14). Beta-blockers were prescribed to 20 per cent (181/913) of men and 15 per cent (72/499) of women with a history of myocardial infarction (1.11; 0.85-1.44).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Most patients with coronary heart disease in primary care were being treated with aspirin but less than half with statins or beta-blockers. More men than women were treated with aspirin and statins, even though women had higher cholesterol levels than men. Men were also more likely to have a confirmed diagnosis and to have undergone a coronary revascularization procedure. There is considerable scope for improving the secondary prevention of coronary heart disease and addressing gender inequalities in primary care.</p>","PeriodicalId":77224,"journal":{"name":"Journal of public health medicine","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2003-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1093/pubmed/fdg007","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"22317495","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 106
Contact tracing and population screening for tuberculosis - who should be assessed? 接触者追踪和结核病人群筛查——应该评估谁?
Pub Date : 2003-01-01 DOI: 10.1093/pubmed/fdg098
R. Whitfield, R. Khan, Anne Smith, C. Rayner
{"title":"Contact tracing and population screening for tuberculosis - who should be assessed?","authors":"R. Whitfield, R. Khan, Anne Smith, C. Rayner","doi":"10.1093/pubmed/fdg098","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1093/pubmed/fdg098","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":77224,"journal":{"name":"Journal of public health medicine","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2003-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1093/pubmed/fdg098","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"61195179","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 28
Patterns of physical activity - Reply 身体活动模式-回复
Pub Date : 2003-01-01 DOI: 10.1093/PUBMED/FDG074
L. Hayes, M. White, N. Unwin, R. Bhopal, C. Fischbacher
{"title":"Patterns of physical activity - Reply","authors":"L. Hayes, M. White, N. Unwin, R. Bhopal, C. Fischbacher","doi":"10.1093/PUBMED/FDG074","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1093/PUBMED/FDG074","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":77224,"journal":{"name":"Journal of public health medicine","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2003-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1093/PUBMED/FDG074","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"61195068","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Putting public health practice into primary care practice: practical implications of implementing the changes in shifting the balance of power in England. 将公共卫生实践纳入初级保健实践:实施改变英格兰权力平衡的实际影响。
Pub Date : 2002-12-01 DOI: 10.1093/pubmed/24.4.243
Sian Griffiths, David Haslam
{"title":"Putting public health practice into primary care practice: practical implications of implementing the changes in shifting the balance of power in England.","authors":"Sian Griffiths,&nbsp;David Haslam","doi":"10.1093/pubmed/24.4.243","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1093/pubmed/24.4.243","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":77224,"journal":{"name":"Journal of public health medicine","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2002-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1093/pubmed/24.4.243","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"22210748","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 10
The ability of general practitioners to detect mental disorders among primary care patients in a stressful environment: Gaza Strip. 全科医生在紧张环境中发现初级保健病人精神障碍的能力:加沙地带。
Pub Date : 2002-12-01 DOI: 10.1093/pubmed/24.4.326
Abdel-hamid Afana, Odd Steffen Dalgard, Espen Bjertness, Berthold Grunfeld

Background: The aim of the present study was to investigate the detection rate by general practitioners (GPs) of mental disorders in a primary health care setting and relating the findings to selected GP characteristics and the patient sociodemographic characteristics.

Methods: The patients were assessed with respect to mental disorders by Hopkins Symptom Checklist 25 (HSCL-25), and the GPs were independently asked to fill in the Goldberg checklist II to assess the patient after consultation. The sample consisted of 10 primary health care clinics in the Gaza Strip, which were randomly selected from the five regions that form the Gaza Strip (Northern, Southern region, Gaza City, Middle region, Khan-Younis and Rafah). Thirty-two GPs and 661 patients participated in the study.

Results: The study showed that the GPs detected only 11.6 per cent of patients with mental disorders at HSCL-25 score >1.75, and that the GP's assessment was not significantly associated with the HSCL-25 scores. GPs with postgraduate psychiatric training performed better in detecting mental disorders, likewise female GPs and those who were more than 40 years old. The results also revealed that the GPs were more able to detect mental disorders among patients older than 25 years, and in female patients.

Conclusions: The GPs' poor detection rate of mental disorders indicates the importance of mental health training for GPs working in primary health care clinics.

背景:本研究的目的是调查全科医生(全科医生)在初级卫生保健机构对精神障碍的检出率,并将结果与选定的全科医生特征和患者社会人口学特征联系起来。方法:采用Hopkins Symptom Checklist 25 (HSCL-25)对患者进行精神障碍评估,并由全科医生独立填写Goldberg Checklist II,在会诊后对患者进行评估。样本包括加沙地带的10个初级保健诊所,这些诊所是从构成加沙地带的五个地区(北部、南部地区、加沙城、中部地区、汗尤尼斯和拉法)随机选择的。32名全科医生和661名患者参与了这项研究。结果:本研究显示,全科医生在HSCL-25评分>1.75时仅检出11.6%的精神障碍患者,全科医生的评估与HSCL-25评分无显著相关性。接受过研究生精神病学培训的全科医生在检测精神障碍方面表现更好,女性全科医生和40岁以上的全科医生也是如此。研究结果还显示,全科医生更能在25岁以上的患者和女性患者中发现精神障碍。结论:全科医生精神障碍检出率较低,说明对初级卫生保健诊所全科医生进行心理健康培训的重要性。
{"title":"The ability of general practitioners to detect mental disorders among primary care patients in a stressful environment: Gaza Strip.","authors":"Abdel-hamid Afana,&nbsp;Odd Steffen Dalgard,&nbsp;Espen Bjertness,&nbsp;Berthold Grunfeld","doi":"10.1093/pubmed/24.4.326","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1093/pubmed/24.4.326","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The aim of the present study was to investigate the detection rate by general practitioners (GPs) of mental disorders in a primary health care setting and relating the findings to selected GP characteristics and the patient sociodemographic characteristics.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The patients were assessed with respect to mental disorders by Hopkins Symptom Checklist 25 (HSCL-25), and the GPs were independently asked to fill in the Goldberg checklist II to assess the patient after consultation. The sample consisted of 10 primary health care clinics in the Gaza Strip, which were randomly selected from the five regions that form the Gaza Strip (Northern, Southern region, Gaza City, Middle region, Khan-Younis and Rafah). Thirty-two GPs and 661 patients participated in the study.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The study showed that the GPs detected only 11.6 per cent of patients with mental disorders at HSCL-25 score >1.75, and that the GP's assessment was not significantly associated with the HSCL-25 scores. GPs with postgraduate psychiatric training performed better in detecting mental disorders, likewise female GPs and those who were more than 40 years old. The results also revealed that the GPs were more able to detect mental disorders among patients older than 25 years, and in female patients.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The GPs' poor detection rate of mental disorders indicates the importance of mental health training for GPs working in primary health care clinics.</p>","PeriodicalId":77224,"journal":{"name":"Journal of public health medicine","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2002-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1093/pubmed/24.4.326","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"22211912","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 35
Childhood cancer in Seascale. 儿童癌症。
Pub Date : 2002-12-01 DOI: 10.1093/pubmed/24.4.343
Richard Wakeford
{"title":"Childhood cancer in Seascale.","authors":"Richard Wakeford","doi":"10.1093/pubmed/24.4.343","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1093/pubmed/24.4.343","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":77224,"journal":{"name":"Journal of public health medicine","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2002-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1093/pubmed/24.4.343","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"22211918","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
期刊
Journal of public health medicine
全部 Acc. Chem. Res. ACS Applied Bio Materials ACS Appl. Electron. Mater. ACS Appl. Energy Mater. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces ACS Appl. Nano Mater. ACS Appl. Polym. Mater. ACS BIOMATER-SCI ENG ACS Catal. ACS Cent. Sci. ACS Chem. Biol. ACS Chemical Health & Safety ACS Chem. Neurosci. ACS Comb. Sci. ACS Earth Space Chem. ACS Energy Lett. ACS Infect. Dis. ACS Macro Lett. ACS Mater. Lett. ACS Med. Chem. Lett. ACS Nano ACS Omega ACS Photonics ACS Sens. ACS Sustainable Chem. Eng. ACS Synth. Biol. Anal. Chem. BIOCHEMISTRY-US Bioconjugate Chem. BIOMACROMOLECULES Chem. Res. Toxicol. Chem. Rev. Chem. Mater. CRYST GROWTH DES ENERG FUEL Environ. Sci. Technol. Environ. Sci. Technol. Lett. Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. IND ENG CHEM RES Inorg. Chem. J. Agric. Food. Chem. J. Chem. Eng. Data J. Chem. Educ. J. Chem. Inf. Model. J. Chem. Theory Comput. J. Med. Chem. J. Nat. Prod. J PROTEOME RES J. Am. Chem. Soc. LANGMUIR MACROMOLECULES Mol. Pharmaceutics Nano Lett. Org. Lett. ORG PROCESS RES DEV ORGANOMETALLICS J. Org. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. A J. Phys. Chem. B J. Phys. Chem. C J. Phys. Chem. Lett. Analyst Anal. Methods Biomater. Sci. Catal. Sci. Technol. Chem. Commun. Chem. Soc. Rev. CHEM EDUC RES PRACT CRYSTENGCOMM Dalton Trans. Energy Environ. Sci. ENVIRON SCI-NANO ENVIRON SCI-PROC IMP ENVIRON SCI-WAT RES Faraday Discuss. Food Funct. Green Chem. Inorg. Chem. Front. Integr. Biol. J. Anal. At. Spectrom. J. Mater. Chem. A J. Mater. Chem. B J. Mater. Chem. C Lab Chip Mater. Chem. Front. Mater. Horiz. MEDCHEMCOMM Metallomics Mol. Biosyst. Mol. Syst. Des. Eng. Nanoscale Nanoscale Horiz. Nat. Prod. Rep. New J. Chem. Org. Biomol. Chem. Org. Chem. Front. PHOTOCH PHOTOBIO SCI PCCP Polym. Chem.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1