Jingjing Liu, Zhifa Wang, Nan Wang, Jingyao Ma, Yu Hu, Jie Ma, Lijuan Wang, Yan Liu, Juntao Ouyang, Zhenping Chen, Xiaoling Cheng, Runhui Wu
<p>Immune thrombocytopenia (ITP) is an acquired bleeding disorder characterized by a reduced platelet count of less than 100 × 10<sup>9</sup>/L, with an estimated incidence of 2–5/100 000 children per year [<span>1</span>]. Since 2014, the China National Medical Products Administration (NMPA) has approved five TPO-RAs for treating ITP in China. Among these, eltrombopag (ELT) and avatrombopag (AVA) are the two most evidence-based and available oral medications for pediatric ITP; both demonstrated promising efficacy and tolerability in clinical trials [<span>2, 3</span>]. Because no head-to-head studies have been conducted, making direct comparisons between the two drugs is difficult. To address this gap, we conducted a multicenter, retrospective, observational cohort study to evaluate the efficacy and safety of ELT versus AVA in pediatric patients with ITP in China, to offer personalized treatment guidance based on factors such as the severity of bleeding, medication adherence, and family economic conditions.</p>