Xiwen Tong, Bin Xu, Shiyuan Zhang, Mengyuan Li, Shuai Su, Yi Zhu, Zhenqian Huang, Yaya Wang, Yi Xiao, Liang Huang, Dengju Li, Wei Huang, Jia Wei, Mei Huang, Zhiping Huang, Yuanyan Tang, Hongbo Ren, Donghua Zhang
<p>Anthracyclines and cytarabine remain the cornerstone of intensive chemotherapy for patients with newly diagnosed acute myeloid leukemia (ND AML), typically delivered as a “7 + 3” regimen, which involves cytarabine (Ara-C) for 7 days and anthracycline (idarubicin (IDA) or daunorubicin (DNR)) for 3 days [<span>1</span>]. Various studies have evaluated optimal anthracycline and Ara-C dosing and explored adding a third drug to improve long-term outcomes and enhance response rates.</p><p>Azanucleoside DNA hypomethylating agents (HMAs) are cytidine analogs that epigenetically reactivate genes via DNA methyltransferase-1 inhibition through aberrant gene silencing reversal [<span>2, 3</span>]. Due to its favorable toxicity profile and anti-leukemic activity, decitabine (DAC) has become the standard treatment foundation for patients with AML who are older or unfit for intensive chemotherapy [<span>4</span>]. However, no prospective clinical studies have compared the efficacy of adding decitabine to the IA (DIA) regimen versus the IA regimen alone. Therefore, we conducted a multicenter, prospective, randomized, controlled trial to evaluate the effects of these two treatment approaches.</p><p>We conducted a multicenter, open-label, randomized controlled clinical trial across four hospitals in China from September 2020 to March 2024, where eligible patients were randomly assigned (1:1) to receive either the DIA or IA regimen. A total of 130 participants were enrolled in the study for interim analysis 65 participants were assigned to receive the DIA induction regimen, while the remaining 65 were assigned to the IA induction regimen (Figure S1). Baseline data are shown in Table S1.</p><p>In the DIA group, 56 patients (86.2%) achieved CR/CRi and eight patients (12.3%) achieved partial remission (PR), resulting in an overall response rate (ORR) of 98.5%. In the IA group, 51 patients (78.5%) achieved CR/CRi and five patients (7.7%) achieved PR, resulting in an ORR of 86.2%. Among those achieving CR, 39 patients (69.6%) in the DIA group achieved deep remission (CR<sub>MRD-</sub>), compared to 19 patients (37.3%) in the IA group (<i>p <</i> 0.006) (Table 1).</p><p>Analysis of molecular abnormalities indicated that patients with methylation mutations (<i>p</i> = 0.030) or CEBPA mutations (<i>p =</i> 0.002) treated with the DIA regimen had significantly higher CR<sub>MRD-</sub> rates than those in the IA group. ELN genetic typing revealed that intermediate-risk (<i>p</i> = 0.038) and adverse-risk patients (<i>p</i> = 0.045) showed a significantly higher CR<sub>MRD-</sub> rate in the DIA group compared to the IA group (Table 2).</p><p>The median follow-up time for the entire cohort was 1027 days (95% confidence interval [CI], 903–1151 days). At the end of follow-up, 35 patients (53.8%) in the DIA group and 43 (66.2%) patients in the IA group underwent allo-HSCT and 51 patients (78.5%) survived in each group. Among patients who achieved CR, relapse occurred in 12
{"title":"DIA Regimen Versus IA Regimen for Induction Therapy in Younger Adults With Acute Myeloid Leukemia: A Multicenter Open-Label Randomized Controlled Trial","authors":"Xiwen Tong, Bin Xu, Shiyuan Zhang, Mengyuan Li, Shuai Su, Yi Zhu, Zhenqian Huang, Yaya Wang, Yi Xiao, Liang Huang, Dengju Li, Wei Huang, Jia Wei, Mei Huang, Zhiping Huang, Yuanyan Tang, Hongbo Ren, Donghua Zhang","doi":"10.1002/ajh.70157","DOIUrl":"10.1002/ajh.70157","url":null,"abstract":"<p>Anthracyclines and cytarabine remain the cornerstone of intensive chemotherapy for patients with newly diagnosed acute myeloid leukemia (ND AML), typically delivered as a “7 + 3” regimen, which involves cytarabine (Ara-C) for 7 days and anthracycline (idarubicin (IDA) or daunorubicin (DNR)) for 3 days [<span>1</span>]. Various studies have evaluated optimal anthracycline and Ara-C dosing and explored adding a third drug to improve long-term outcomes and enhance response rates.</p><p>Azanucleoside DNA hypomethylating agents (HMAs) are cytidine analogs that epigenetically reactivate genes via DNA methyltransferase-1 inhibition through aberrant gene silencing reversal [<span>2, 3</span>]. Due to its favorable toxicity profile and anti-leukemic activity, decitabine (DAC) has become the standard treatment foundation for patients with AML who are older or unfit for intensive chemotherapy [<span>4</span>]. However, no prospective clinical studies have compared the efficacy of adding decitabine to the IA (DIA) regimen versus the IA regimen alone. Therefore, we conducted a multicenter, prospective, randomized, controlled trial to evaluate the effects of these two treatment approaches.</p><p>We conducted a multicenter, open-label, randomized controlled clinical trial across four hospitals in China from September 2020 to March 2024, where eligible patients were randomly assigned (1:1) to receive either the DIA or IA regimen. A total of 130 participants were enrolled in the study for interim analysis 65 participants were assigned to receive the DIA induction regimen, while the remaining 65 were assigned to the IA induction regimen (Figure S1). Baseline data are shown in Table S1.</p><p>In the DIA group, 56 patients (86.2%) achieved CR/CRi and eight patients (12.3%) achieved partial remission (PR), resulting in an overall response rate (ORR) of 98.5%. In the IA group, 51 patients (78.5%) achieved CR/CRi and five patients (7.7%) achieved PR, resulting in an ORR of 86.2%. Among those achieving CR, 39 patients (69.6%) in the DIA group achieved deep remission (CR<sub>MRD-</sub>), compared to 19 patients (37.3%) in the IA group (<i>p <</i> 0.006) (Table 1).</p><p>Analysis of molecular abnormalities indicated that patients with methylation mutations (<i>p</i> = 0.030) or CEBPA mutations (<i>p =</i> 0.002) treated with the DIA regimen had significantly higher CR<sub>MRD-</sub> rates than those in the IA group. ELN genetic typing revealed that intermediate-risk (<i>p</i> = 0.038) and adverse-risk patients (<i>p</i> = 0.045) showed a significantly higher CR<sub>MRD-</sub> rate in the DIA group compared to the IA group (Table 2).</p><p>The median follow-up time for the entire cohort was 1027 days (95% confidence interval [CI], 903–1151 days). At the end of follow-up, 35 patients (53.8%) in the DIA group and 43 (66.2%) patients in the IA group underwent allo-HSCT and 51 patients (78.5%) survived in each group. Among patients who achieved CR, relapse occurred in 12","PeriodicalId":7724,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Hematology","volume":"101 2","pages":"388-393"},"PeriodicalIF":9.9,"publicationDate":"2025-12-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/ajh.70157","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145688969","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Why We Do Not Recommend That People With High‐Risk Smoldering Myeloma Receive Treatment","authors":"Ghulam Rehman Mohyuddin, Mackenzie Lemieux, Rajshekhar Chakraborty, Morie Gertz","doi":"10.1002/ajh.70159","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1002/ajh.70159","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":7724,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Hematology","volume":"29 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":12.8,"publicationDate":"2025-12-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145673557","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Omar Ammari, Mina Shah, Yasmin Elgammal, Ammar Husami, Theodosia A. Kalfa, Jahnavi Gollamudi
{"title":"When a Trait Becomes a Disease: A Rare Hematologic Overlap of Sickle Cell Trait and Hereditary Spherocytosis","authors":"Omar Ammari, Mina Shah, Yasmin Elgammal, Ammar Husami, Theodosia A. Kalfa, Jahnavi Gollamudi","doi":"10.1002/ajh.70154","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1002/ajh.70154","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":7724,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Hematology","volume":"32 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":12.8,"publicationDate":"2025-12-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145673555","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Niccolò Bartalucci, Danilo Tarantino, Giuseppe G. Loscocco, Alessio Enderti, Daniele Colazzo, Raffaella Santi, Daniela Parrini, Manjola Balliu, Valentina Boldrini, Yasmine Abbassi, Elisabetta Pelo, Monia Marchetti, Paola Guglielmelli, Alessandro M. Vannucchi
In our study, we identified a novel, ruxolitinib-sensitive, CCDC6::JAK2 fusion gene as a driver of atypical JAK2-unmutated MPN with a polycythemic phenotype. The CCDC6::JAK2 chimeric protein retains the CCDC6 coiled-coil domain and the JAK2 kinase domain. Dimerization of chimeric proteins through coiled-coil domains promotes JAK2 autophosphorylation leading to constitutive activation of the JAK/STAT signaling pathway.