In a quality nursing care survey conducted in Israel, 1988-1990, the four nursing process components were examined. The survey covered 13 hospitals with 119 medical and surgical wards, in which the nursing care quality for a sample of 2065 patients was assessed. Instruments used were (a) the Patient Classification Form, to assess patient dependency level, and (b) Monitor--an index of the quality of nursing care for acute medical and surgical wards [Goldstone et al., Polytechnic Products, Newcastle upon Tyne, 1982], a British adaptation of the Rush Medicus methodology [Jelinek et al., US Dept of Health, Education and Welfare, 1974]. The survey process involved orientation of the hospitals' senior staff, and training of participants in the administration of patient classification and of Monitor. The highest quality nursing care was found in "Meeting the patient's physical needs"; the lowest in "Assessment and planning of patient care". Factors chosen for possible influence on quality of nursing care were: patient dependency category, type of ward (medical, surgical), ward size and hospital size. The most influential factor was found to be the patient dependency category.
在1988-1990年在以色列进行的一项质量护理调查中,对四个护理过程组成部分进行了检查。调查覆盖了13家医院119个内科和外科病房,对其中2065名患者的护理质量进行了评估。使用的工具是(a)评估患者依赖程度的患者分类表,以及(b) Monitor——急性内科和外科病房护理质量的指标[Goldstone等人,Polytechnic Products, Newcastle upon Tyne, 1982年],这是英国对Rush Medicus方法的改编[Jelinek等人,美国卫生、教育和福利部,1974年]。调查过程涉及医院高级工作人员的情况介绍,以及对病人分类和Monitor管理方面的参与者进行培训。“满足病人的生理需求”是最高质量的护理;“病人护理评估与计划”得分最低。选择可能影响护理质量的因素有:患者依赖类别、病房类型(内科、外科)、病房大小和医院规模。影响最大的因素是患者的依赖类别。
{"title":"Quality nursing care survey, 1988-1990.","authors":"R Ron, Y Bar-Tal","doi":"10.1093/intqhc/5.1.57","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1093/intqhc/5.1.57","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>In a quality nursing care survey conducted in Israel, 1988-1990, the four nursing process components were examined. The survey covered 13 hospitals with 119 medical and surgical wards, in which the nursing care quality for a sample of 2065 patients was assessed. Instruments used were (a) the Patient Classification Form, to assess patient dependency level, and (b) Monitor--an index of the quality of nursing care for acute medical and surgical wards [Goldstone et al., Polytechnic Products, Newcastle upon Tyne, 1982], a British adaptation of the Rush Medicus methodology [Jelinek et al., US Dept of Health, Education and Welfare, 1974]. The survey process involved orientation of the hospitals' senior staff, and training of participants in the administration of patient classification and of Monitor. The highest quality nursing care was found in \"Meeting the patient's physical needs\"; the lowest in \"Assessment and planning of patient care\". Factors chosen for possible influence on quality of nursing care were: patient dependency category, type of ward (medical, surgical), ward size and hospital size. The most influential factor was found to be the patient dependency category.</p>","PeriodicalId":77341,"journal":{"name":"Quality assurance in health care : the official journal of the International Society for Quality Assurance in Health Care","volume":"5 1","pages":"57-65"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"1993-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1093/intqhc/5.1.57","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"19439931","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
L H Harrison, N Khallaf, M el Mougi, H Koura, I Shobair, N Terreri
Unlabelled: To develop an instrument to measure the quality of acute respiratory infection (ARI) case management among Egyptian children.
Methods: A baseline survey of all health facilities in a single district, using a multi-data source instrument. Data sources included providers, caretakers, patient records and observation of patient care.
Main results: Physicians did not count the respiratory rate and check for subcostal retraction. Eighty-seven per cent of children who did not require antibiotics received them. Of five children who required antibiotics, four (80%) were prescribed an oral regimen. Three of these should have been admitted to a hospital but were not. Antibiotics were available at the facilities an estimated 7.9 months per year. Oxygen for inpatient treatment was available in one of two hospitals.
Conclusions: This instrument was useful for comprehensively evaluating facility capability to provide quality case management. Deficiencies were identified but were not unexpected in a baseline survey. The Egypt ARI program has the potential to have a substantial impact on how children with ARI are diagnosed and treated in health facilities.
{"title":"An instrument to assess acute respiratory infection case management in Egypt.","authors":"L H Harrison, N Khallaf, M el Mougi, H Koura, I Shobair, N Terreri","doi":"10.1093/intqhc/5.1.67","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1093/intqhc/5.1.67","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Unlabelled: </strong>To develop an instrument to measure the quality of acute respiratory infection (ARI) case management among Egyptian children.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A baseline survey of all health facilities in a single district, using a multi-data source instrument. Data sources included providers, caretakers, patient records and observation of patient care.</p><p><strong>Main results: </strong>Physicians did not count the respiratory rate and check for subcostal retraction. Eighty-seven per cent of children who did not require antibiotics received them. Of five children who required antibiotics, four (80%) were prescribed an oral regimen. Three of these should have been admitted to a hospital but were not. Antibiotics were available at the facilities an estimated 7.9 months per year. Oxygen for inpatient treatment was available in one of two hospitals.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This instrument was useful for comprehensively evaluating facility capability to provide quality case management. Deficiencies were identified but were not unexpected in a baseline survey. The Egypt ARI program has the potential to have a substantial impact on how children with ARI are diagnosed and treated in health facilities.</p>","PeriodicalId":77341,"journal":{"name":"Quality assurance in health care : the official journal of the International Society for Quality Assurance in Health Care","volume":"5 1","pages":"67-73"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"1993-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1093/intqhc/5.1.67","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"19439932","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Patient questionnaires are commonly used to assess patient satisfaction. This study reports on methodological experiences based on practical use of a Swedish questionnaire. The material consists of questionnaires from five different studies at some 60 wards in three hospitals. Four of the studies were performed by "routine procedure", while one was performed specially to study sampling, non-response and other losses. The results showed that a large number of patients were not given a questionnaire despite the fact that they should have been included according to the sampling criteria. In the special study barely half of those discharged answered a questionnaire corresponding to only about one in four in some studies performed routinely. Many of the patients excluded were probably in a difficult situation and their needs ought to be particularly noticed. This was true of patients who were old or confused, had language difficulties, were seriously ill, or who died during the care episode.
{"title":"Patient satisfaction surveys subsequent to hospital care: problems of sampling, non-response and other losses.","authors":"M Ehnfors, B Smedby","doi":"10.1093/intqhc/5.1.19","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1093/intqhc/5.1.19","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Patient questionnaires are commonly used to assess patient satisfaction. This study reports on methodological experiences based on practical use of a Swedish questionnaire. The material consists of questionnaires from five different studies at some 60 wards in three hospitals. Four of the studies were performed by \"routine procedure\", while one was performed specially to study sampling, non-response and other losses. The results showed that a large number of patients were not given a questionnaire despite the fact that they should have been included according to the sampling criteria. In the special study barely half of those discharged answered a questionnaire corresponding to only about one in four in some studies performed routinely. Many of the patients excluded were probably in a difficult situation and their needs ought to be particularly noticed. This was true of patients who were old or confused, had language difficulties, were seriously ill, or who died during the care episode.</p>","PeriodicalId":77341,"journal":{"name":"Quality assurance in health care : the official journal of the International Society for Quality Assurance in Health Care","volume":"5 1","pages":"19-32"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"1993-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1093/intqhc/5.1.19","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"19439926","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Effect of total hip replacement on quality of life.","authors":"I Goldie","doi":"10.1093/intqhc/5.1.9","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1093/intqhc/5.1.9","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":77341,"journal":{"name":"Quality assurance in health care : the official journal of the International Society for Quality Assurance in Health Care","volume":"5 1","pages":"9-12"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"1993-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1093/intqhc/5.1.9","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"19440511","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Quality assurance of medical research?","authors":"P Reizenstein","doi":"10.1093/intqhc/5.1.1","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1093/intqhc/5.1.1","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":77341,"journal":{"name":"Quality assurance in health care : the official journal of the International Society for Quality Assurance in Health Care","volume":"5 1","pages":"1-2"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"1993-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1093/intqhc/5.1.1","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"19441220","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
G M Fraser, D Pilpel, S Hollis, J Kosecoff, R H Brook
A consensus panel approach was used in Israel to develop a list of clinical indications for which there was agreement that cholecystectomy should be performed. Nine physicians from different disciplines were asked to score a list of 266 clinical indications for cholecystectomy. Each indication was scored on a scale of 1 (inappropriate, i.e. health risks exceed health benefits) to 9 (appropriate, i.e. benefits exceed risks). Each indication also included one of four comorbidity levels (none to high). Agreement and disagreement were defined and panelists met to discuss, modify and rescore the list. The composition of the panel and definitions of agreement had a considerable impact on the preparation of a list of agreed, appropriate indications for cholecystectomy. Gastroenterologists in the panel were less likely to recommend surgery than either surgeons or general internists both before and after the panel discussion. Following the discussion the level of agreement (defined as after discarding the highest and lowest score all of the remaining seven panelists were in a 3-point range) increased from 39% to 46% (p < 0.08) and disagreement decreased from 27% to 18% (p < 0.01). Fifty-nine of the 266 indications were considered appropriate with agreement.
{"title":"Indications for cholecystectomy: the results of a consensus panel approach.","authors":"G M Fraser, D Pilpel, S Hollis, J Kosecoff, R H Brook","doi":"10.1093/intqhc/5.1.75","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1093/intqhc/5.1.75","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>A consensus panel approach was used in Israel to develop a list of clinical indications for which there was agreement that cholecystectomy should be performed. Nine physicians from different disciplines were asked to score a list of 266 clinical indications for cholecystectomy. Each indication was scored on a scale of 1 (inappropriate, i.e. health risks exceed health benefits) to 9 (appropriate, i.e. benefits exceed risks). Each indication also included one of four comorbidity levels (none to high). Agreement and disagreement were defined and panelists met to discuss, modify and rescore the list. The composition of the panel and definitions of agreement had a considerable impact on the preparation of a list of agreed, appropriate indications for cholecystectomy. Gastroenterologists in the panel were less likely to recommend surgery than either surgeons or general internists both before and after the panel discussion. Following the discussion the level of agreement (defined as after discarding the highest and lowest score all of the remaining seven panelists were in a 3-point range) increased from 39% to 46% (p < 0.08) and disagreement decreased from 27% to 18% (p < 0.01). Fifty-nine of the 266 indications were considered appropriate with agreement.</p>","PeriodicalId":77341,"journal":{"name":"Quality assurance in health care : the official journal of the International Society for Quality Assurance in Health Care","volume":"5 1","pages":"75-80"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"1993-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1093/intqhc/5.1.75","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"19440509","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
G M Fraser, D Pilpel, S Hollis, J Kosecoff, R H Brook
Indications as to which patients should undergo cholecystectomy remain, at least in part, a matter of controversy. In 1987, a panel of nine Israeli physicians from different specialties established a list of indications for the performance of cholecystectomy based on the literature available at the time. The panel agreed that cholecystectomy was appropriate for 59 indications and that it was inappropriate for 58. The major indications for surgery were biliary colic and acute cholecystitis. Patients who were asymptomatic or had vague symptoms were not recommended to undergo surgery unless they had stones in the common bile duct and were less than 71 years of age. Patients with pancreatitis were recommended for surgery if they had stones in the common bile duct and did not have a history of alcohol abuse. Performing a cholecystectomy at the same time as abdominal surgery was being performed for other reasons was indicated only if the patient was symptomatic from his gall-stones.
{"title":"The agreed indications and contra-indications for cholecystectomy.","authors":"G M Fraser, D Pilpel, S Hollis, J Kosecoff, R H Brook","doi":"10.1093/intqhc/5.1.81","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1093/intqhc/5.1.81","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Indications as to which patients should undergo cholecystectomy remain, at least in part, a matter of controversy. In 1987, a panel of nine Israeli physicians from different specialties established a list of indications for the performance of cholecystectomy based on the literature available at the time. The panel agreed that cholecystectomy was appropriate for 59 indications and that it was inappropriate for 58. The major indications for surgery were biliary colic and acute cholecystitis. Patients who were asymptomatic or had vague symptoms were not recommended to undergo surgery unless they had stones in the common bile duct and were less than 71 years of age. Patients with pancreatitis were recommended for surgery if they had stones in the common bile duct and did not have a history of alcohol abuse. Performing a cholecystectomy at the same time as abdominal surgery was being performed for other reasons was indicated only if the patient was symptomatic from his gall-stones.</p>","PeriodicalId":77341,"journal":{"name":"Quality assurance in health care : the official journal of the International Society for Quality Assurance in Health Care","volume":"5 1","pages":"81-5"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"1993-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1093/intqhc/5.1.81","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"19440510","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
The development of quality assurance programs for psychiatric care has increased the interest in quality of care and accountability from the patient's perspective. However, most investigations of patient satisfaction use instruments which rate aspects of care defined and held to be important by professionals and care givers. The aims of this study were 2-fold. To map descriptive characteristics of ideal inpatient psychiatric care through open patient interviews, using a sample of 78 hospitalized patients and, secondly, based on a content analysis of these interviews, to have another sample of 77 hospitalized patients rank the importance of 48 treatment characteristics extracted from the qualitative analysis. Results of the content analysis showed that characteristics of ideal inpatient treatment could be classified in six categories: staff-patient relationship, patient co-influence, treatment content, activities, ward atmosphere and staff competence. Results from the patients' rating of the importance of treatment characteristics showed that patients put the highest emphasis on staff empathic qualities: being caring, interested and understanding, respecting patients, devoting time to patients, and creating a safe treatment environment. The least importance was ascribed to characteristics of the physical environment and daily routines on the ward. It is concluded that in order to secure content validity of investigations of the quality of psychiatric inpatient care from the patient's perspective, effort should be put into including the areas of staff-patient relationships and patient information and co-influence.
{"title":"What is important in psychiatric inpatient care? Quality of care from the patient's perspective.","authors":"L Hansson, T Björkman, I Berglund","doi":"10.1093/intqhc/5.1.41","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1093/intqhc/5.1.41","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The development of quality assurance programs for psychiatric care has increased the interest in quality of care and accountability from the patient's perspective. However, most investigations of patient satisfaction use instruments which rate aspects of care defined and held to be important by professionals and care givers. The aims of this study were 2-fold. To map descriptive characteristics of ideal inpatient psychiatric care through open patient interviews, using a sample of 78 hospitalized patients and, secondly, based on a content analysis of these interviews, to have another sample of 77 hospitalized patients rank the importance of 48 treatment characteristics extracted from the qualitative analysis. Results of the content analysis showed that characteristics of ideal inpatient treatment could be classified in six categories: staff-patient relationship, patient co-influence, treatment content, activities, ward atmosphere and staff competence. Results from the patients' rating of the importance of treatment characteristics showed that patients put the highest emphasis on staff empathic qualities: being caring, interested and understanding, respecting patients, devoting time to patients, and creating a safe treatment environment. The least importance was ascribed to characteristics of the physical environment and daily routines on the ward. It is concluded that in order to secure content validity of investigations of the quality of psychiatric inpatient care from the patient's perspective, effort should be put into including the areas of staff-patient relationships and patient information and co-influence.</p>","PeriodicalId":77341,"journal":{"name":"Quality assurance in health care : the official journal of the International Society for Quality Assurance in Health Care","volume":"5 1","pages":"41-7"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"1993-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1093/intqhc/5.1.41","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"19439929","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 1992-12-01DOI: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.intqhc.a036728
J J Mira, J Vitaller, J A Buil, J M Aranaz, J F Herrero
The purpose of the present study was to evaluate the importance of absenteeism due to illness in the hospital organization. A measurement of absenteeism due to illness among hospital professionals of the National Health System in the Alicante province (Spain) during the years 1988, 1989 and 1990 was carried out, as well as its repercussion on quality assurance in health care. The absenteeism index (frequency) was 5.39, 6.38 and 6.79 in 1988, 1989 and 1990, respectively. The extent of absenteeism (duration) in 1988 was 19.7 days per worker, and was 24.23 in 1989 and 26.45 in 1990. Hospitals with more than 400 beds presented during these periods poor absenteeism self-control. Maintenance personnel, nurses, administrative personnel and graduates had, in this order, the highest scores of days lost. We show that the dimension of Intrinsic Job Satisfaction, Extrinsic Job Satisfaction and Job Monotony are interrelated with absenteeism.
{"title":"Absenteeism as a symptom of occupational ill-health in hospitals and its repercussion on quality assurance.","authors":"J J Mira, J Vitaller, J A Buil, J M Aranaz, J F Herrero","doi":"10.1093/oxfordjournals.intqhc.a036728","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordjournals.intqhc.a036728","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The purpose of the present study was to evaluate the importance of absenteeism due to illness in the hospital organization. A measurement of absenteeism due to illness among hospital professionals of the National Health System in the Alicante province (Spain) during the years 1988, 1989 and 1990 was carried out, as well as its repercussion on quality assurance in health care. The absenteeism index (frequency) was 5.39, 6.38 and 6.79 in 1988, 1989 and 1990, respectively. The extent of absenteeism (duration) in 1988 was 19.7 days per worker, and was 24.23 in 1989 and 26.45 in 1990. Hospitals with more than 400 beds presented during these periods poor absenteeism self-control. Maintenance personnel, nurses, administrative personnel and graduates had, in this order, the highest scores of days lost. We show that the dimension of Intrinsic Job Satisfaction, Extrinsic Job Satisfaction and Job Monotony are interrelated with absenteeism.</p>","PeriodicalId":77341,"journal":{"name":"Quality assurance in health care : the official journal of the International Society for Quality Assurance in Health Care","volume":"4 4","pages":"273-87"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"1992-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1093/oxfordjournals.intqhc.a036728","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"12659667","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 1992-12-01DOI: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.intqhc.a036732
R Westerling
Mortality from potentially avoidable causes of death in Sweden 1974-85 for ages 0-64 years was analysed, based on a list published by Rutstein et al., [N Engl J Med 294: 582, 1976] of conditions that were suggested to serve as negative indicators of the quality of health care. In females 22% of deaths and in males 18% of deaths had underlying causes that were included in the list. Deaths from avoidable causes in the Rutstein list were concentrated to a limited number of causes of death and cause of death groups, such as neoplasms and diseases of the respiratory system. Both preventable and treatable conditions were found among the most common avoidable causes of death. There were differences in the causes of death that were most common between different age groups. A large number of the avoidable causes of death were relatively rare in Sweden. Areas for continued methodological development are suggested concerning the choice of avoidable causes of death and the definition of standards.
根据Rutstein等人[N Engl J Med 294: 582, 1976]公布的一份被认为是卫生保健质量负面指标的条件清单,分析了1974- 1985年瑞典0-64岁人群因潜在可避免的死亡原因造成的死亡率。22%的女性死亡和18%的男性死亡的根本原因都列入了清单。Rutstein清单中可避免原因造成的死亡集中在有限数量的死亡原因和死亡原因群体中,例如肿瘤和呼吸系统疾病。在最常见的可避免死亡原因中发现了可预防和可治疗的疾病。不同年龄组之间最常见的死亡原因存在差异。在瑞典,大量可避免的死亡原因相对较少。建议在选择可避免的死亡原因和确定标准方面继续发展方法。
{"title":"\"Avoidable\" causes of death in Sweden 1974-85.","authors":"R Westerling","doi":"10.1093/oxfordjournals.intqhc.a036732","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordjournals.intqhc.a036732","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Mortality from potentially avoidable causes of death in Sweden 1974-85 for ages 0-64 years was analysed, based on a list published by Rutstein et al., [N Engl J Med 294: 582, 1976] of conditions that were suggested to serve as negative indicators of the quality of health care. In females 22% of deaths and in males 18% of deaths had underlying causes that were included in the list. Deaths from avoidable causes in the Rutstein list were concentrated to a limited number of causes of death and cause of death groups, such as neoplasms and diseases of the respiratory system. Both preventable and treatable conditions were found among the most common avoidable causes of death. There were differences in the causes of death that were most common between different age groups. A large number of the avoidable causes of death were relatively rare in Sweden. Areas for continued methodological development are suggested concerning the choice of avoidable causes of death and the definition of standards.</p>","PeriodicalId":77341,"journal":{"name":"Quality assurance in health care : the official journal of the International Society for Quality Assurance in Health Care","volume":"4 4","pages":"319-28"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"1992-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1093/oxfordjournals.intqhc.a036732","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"12659671","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}