American Journal on Addictions最新文献

Background and objectives: More knowledge is needed to identify and reach those at overdose risk with preventive measures. We examined past 12-month health service utilization, identified the most frequently utilized service, explored this utilization in more detail, and examined correlates of overdose death.

Methods: A population-based nested case-control registry study including all drug overdose deaths (1 January 2010 to 31 December 2018) in Norway through the Cause of Death Registry (n = 2388). The year-, age- and gender-matched controls included through a population registry (n = 21,465). Data cross-linked with population and patient registries. Multivariable conditional logistic regression analyses estimated the likelihood of overdose death.

Results: The cases (vs. controls) attended a higher median number of services (3 vs. 1). The General Practitioner (GP) was the most utilized service. The majority (55.7%) of cases had 11-50 encounters, while the majority (60.7%) of the controls had 1-5 encounters. No high school diploma, no employment, urban living, social welfare benefits/disability pension, single-person household, recent incarceration, multiple health service utilization and frequent GP encounters, as well psychological and certain physical diagnoses were correlates of overdose death among the GP attenders.

Discussion and conclusions: The cases had utilized more services than the controls and the GP was the most frequently utilized service. In addition to low socioeconomic status, psychological and certain physical diagnoses were correlates of overdose death.

Scientific significance: This is the first national case-control registry study to document the high utilization of multiple primary and secondary health care services before drug overdose death, as well as reasons for attendance and correlates of overdose death.

Background and objectives: Eating disorders (EDs) and substance use disorders are prevalent among college students in the United States, with underlying common mechanisms suggesting co-occurrence of these in the student population. As treatment prognosis of EDs improves when they are identified and treated with early intervention, it is essential to understand which substance use behaviors associate with EDs in students.

Methods: Using a sample of 471 college students recruited for a study on high risk drinking (i.e., students needed to pregame regularly to be included), we explored the associations between ED symptomatology and two common substances used in this population: alcohol and cannabis. As most research on EDs focuses on female students only or does not separate out males and females, we examined whether sex assigned at birth moderated the association between ED symptomatology and substance use outcomes.

Results: About one-third (32.4%) of the sample screened positive for an ED, with females significantly more likely to screen positive. Males were significantly more likely to screen positive for an alcohol or cannabis use disorder. Screening positive for an ED associated with cannabis use frequency and cannabis use disorder symptoms, but not with alcohol outcomes. Sex moderated the association between ED and cannabis use disorder symptoms, with positive ED screen male students experiencing the highest cannabis use disorder symptoms.

Discussion and conclusions: It is necessary to further assess how sex differences in substance use and ED symptomatology inform each other.

Scientific significance: Findings underscore the need to assess and screen for cannabis use disorder among students who screen positive for an ED, and, more specifically, with focused attention on male students with ED symptoms.

Background and objectives: Noradrenergic dysregulation is important in the pathophysiology of posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) and alcohol use disorder (AUD); pharmacotherapies targeting adrenergic function have potential as treatment for comorbidity. Dexmedetomidine (sublingual film formulation-BXCL501; IGALMI) is a highly potent, selective ⍺2-adrenergic receptor agonist and may be superior to other pharmacotherapeutic approaches. A within subjects, phase 1b safety laboratory study was conducted to evaluate adverse effects of BXCL501 when combined with alcohol; BXCL501's potential efficacy was also explored.

Methods: Heavy drinker participants with a diagnosis of or who were at risk for PTSD participated in three separate test days which included pretreatment with BXCL501 (40 µg, 80 µg or placebo) administered in a randomized, double-blind fashion, followed by three testing conditions: alcohol cue reactivity, trauma-induced reactivity, and IV ethanol administration. Safety outcomes included blood pressure (BP) and sedation. Exploratory outcomes included alcohol craving, trauma-induced anxiety and craving and subjective effects of alcohol.

Results: Ten of twelve randomized participants competed the entire study. BXCL501 (80 µg) was associated with expected mild changes in BP and sedation; administration with alcohol did not affect those parameters. There were no clinically significant adverse effects. BXCL501 attenuated trauma-induced anxiety and attenuated subjective effects of alcohol.

Discussions and conclusions: BXCL501 is safe for use in humans who may drink alcohol while undergoing treatment. BXCL501 may be explored as a potential treatment for PTSD and AUD.

Scientific significance: This is the first study to provide scientific support for BXCL501's potential to treat PTSD and comorbid AUD.

Background and objectives: History of nonfatal overdose (NFO) is common among people who use opioids, but little is known about opioid agonist treatment (OAT) outcomes for this high-risk subpopulation. The objective of this study was to investigate the relative effectiveness of buprenorphine/naloxone and methadone on retention and suppression of opioid use among individuals with opioid use disorder (OUD) and history of NFO.

Methods: Secondary analysis of a pan-Canadian pragmatic trial comparing flexible take-home buprenorphine/naloxone and supervised methadone for people with OUD and history of NFO. Logistic regression was used to examine the impact of OAT on retention in the assigned or in any OAT at 24 weeks and analysis of covariance was used to examine the mean difference in opioid use between treatment arms.

Results: Of the 272 randomized participants, 155 (57%) reported at least one NFO at baseline. Retention rates in the assigned treatment were 17.7% in the buprenorphine/naloxone group and 18.4% in the methadone group (adjusted odds ratio [AOR] = 0.54, 95% CI: 0.17-1.54). Rates of retention in any OAT were 28% and 20% in the buprenorphine/naloxone and methadone arms, respectively (AOR = 1.55, 95% CI: 0.65-3.78). There was an 11.9% adjusted mean difference in opioid-free urine drug tests, favoring the buprenorphine/naloxone arm (95% CI: 3.5-20.3; p = .0057).

Conclusions and scientific significance: Among adults with OUD and a history of overdose, overall retention rates were low but improved when retention in any treatment was considered. These findings highlight the importance of flexibility and patient-centered care to improve retention and other treatment outcomes in this population.

Background and objectives: National trends reveal a concerning escalation in racial and ethnic disparities in buprenorphine treatment duration for opioid use disorder. However, the extent of such disparities at the state level remains largely unexplored. This study aims to examine such disparities at the state level.

Methods: We analyzed 9,040,620 buprenorphine prescriptions dispensed between January 2011 and December 2020 from IQVIA Longitudinal Prescription data. The primary outcome was the difference in median treatment duration between White people and racial and ethnic minorities. We also included a second outcome measurement to quantify the difference in median treatment duration among episodes lasting ≥180 days. Using quantile regressions, we examined racial and ethnic disparities in treatment duration, adjusting for the patient's age, sex, payment type, and calendar year of the treatment episode. All analyses were conducted at the state level.

Results: Our study revealed substantial statewide variations in racial and ethnic disparities. Specifically, 21 states showed longer treatment durations for White people across all episodes, and eight states displayed similar trends among episodes lasting ≥180 days. Five states exhibited longer treatment durations for White people in both overall and long-term episodes. Fifteen states showed no racial and ethnic disparities.

Conclusion and scientific significance: These results are among the first to indicate substantial statewide variations in racial and ethnic disparities in buprenorphine treatment episode duration, providing a critical foundation for targeted interventions to enhance buprenorphine treatment, especially in states confronting such pronounced racial and ethnic disparities.

Background and objectives: As overdose rates rise among non-White Americans, understanding barriers to substance use disorder (SUD) treatment access by race and ethnicity is important. This study explores self-reported barriers to SUD treatment by race and ethnicity in emergency department (ED) populations.

Methods: We conducted a secondary, exploratory analysis of a randomized trial of patients not seeking SUD treatment who endorsed active drug use at six academic EDs. Responses to the Barriers to Treatment Inventory were compared by race, ethnicity, and drug severity, using χ² tests (N = 858), followed by adjusted logistic regression models.

Results: Absence of a perceived drug problem (39% non-Hispanic Black, 38% Hispanic, 50% non-Hispanic White; p ≤ .001) was the most prevalent barrier to SUD treatment. Non-Hispanic Black participants were less likely to state that they could handle their drug use on their own (OR = 0.69, CI = 0.50-0.95), and were more likely to report disliking personal questions than non-Hispanic White participants (OR = 1.49, CI = 1.07-2.09). Non-Hispanic Black participants were less likely than Hispanic participants to agree that treatment availability (OR = 0.46, CI = 0.28-0.76) and family disapproval (OR = 0.38, CI = 0.16-0.91) were treatment barriers.

Discussion and conclusions: Screening and counseling may help address the barrier, common to all groups, that drug use was not seen as problematic. Expanding access to diverse treatment options may also address the range of barriers reported by our study population.

Scientific significance: Our study is one of the first in the U.S. to examine both individual and structural barriers to accessing treatment and to examine the association with drug use severity by race/ethnicity.

Background and objectives: Approximately 9% of people who are exposed to a nonbenzodiazepine sedative-hypnotic medication ("z-drug") misuse this medication, yet, the reasons why people misuse z-drugs are not well-characterized.

Methods: Using population survey data, we examined gender and age differences in motives for z-drug misuse.

Results: Results suggested women and older adults have higher odds of misusing z-drugs for sleep, and young adults have higher odds of misusing for recreation.

Discussion and conclusions: Although the majority of people who misuse z-drugs report misusing to manage sleep, this is particularly common in women and older adults.

Scientific significance: Addressing inadequately treated sleep concerns may help mitigate z-drug misuse.

Background and objectives: Benzodiazepines are the primary method of treatment of alcohol withdrawal, though the American Society of Addiction Medicine guidelines also include alternative agents for consideration. Observations in a Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) psychiatric emergency room noted consistent benzodiazepine use with an overall lack of use of alternative agents, even with low Clinical Institute Withdrawal Assessment for Alcohol (CIWA) scores and in the absence of other concerning symptoms. Due to concerns of potential more-than-necessary benzodiazepine use, we analyzed adjunctive clonidine use for elevated blood pressure/pulse in alcohol withdrawal among this Veteran population.

Methods: This is a single-site VA retrospective chart review of the psychiatric emergency room from July 1, 2022, to June 30, 2023, focused on patients with alcohol withdrawal managed on a CIWA protocol. Excluding concurrent opioid withdrawal and clonidine as home medication, 167 patient charts were analyzed for this study.

Results: Among 167 patients, 99 (59.3%) had comorbid hypertension. A total of 614 medication doses were given for elevated CIWA (373, 60.8%) and elevated blood pressure/pulse (241, 39.2%). Of the 241 doses for elevated blood pressure/pulse, only 2.5% were clonidine. Among all benzodiazepine doses, 75.3% were given to patients with comorbid hypertension. Clonidine was administered to 3.0% of patients, making up 2.5% of total dosing.

Discussion and conclusions: Alcohol withdrawal management lacks optimization. Integrating adjunctive medications could reduce potential benzodiazepine overuse effectively addressing elevated blood pressure/pulse.

Scientific significance: This study sheds light on the potential underutilization of clonidine and its potential role in improving alcohol withdrawal syndrome management. By addressing elevated blood pressure/pulse and curbing potential overuse of benzodiazepines, it may contribute to further optimizing patient care.

Background and objectives: Criminal-legal (CL) referrals to addiction treatment have historically had low utilization of medications for opioid use disorder (MOUD). While state differences have been reported, an in-depth longitudinal analysis of state-by-state differences is lacking.

Methods: The Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration Treatment Episode Dataset-Admissions 2000-2020 provided data for individuals entering their initial treatment with an opioid as their primary substance. Outcome was planned use of MOUD, assessing odds ratio (OR) of CL referrals relative to non-CL referrals cumulatively over the 21-year period and as incremental change (change in relative disparity) using effect sizes, stratified by each state.

Results: 2,187,447 cases met the criteria. Planned MOUD occurred in 37.7% of non-CL clients versus 6.5% of CL clients (OR = 0.11, 95% confidence interval = 0.11-0.12). For all clients, planned MOUD increased from 2000 (33.9%) to 2020 (44.8%). This increase was blunted within CL clients, increasing from 2000 (6.4%) to 2020 (13.3%). Rhode Island saw the greatest improvements in equity.

Discussion and conclusions: While rates of planned MOUD increased over the 21 years, a significant disparity persisted among CL clients in most states. As opioid use disorders and opioid-related overdoses are more prevalent among those involved with the CL system, improving this has high impact.

Scientific significance: Provides the most comprehensive analysis of state-by-state inequities in MOUD access for CL relative to non-CL referrals over a 21-year period through use of a national data set. Positive outliers are used as case examples for others to follow in pursuit of more equitable care.

Background and objectives: The use of both electronic and combustible cigarettes is related to greater rates of cannabis use. Further, cannabis use is associated with worse combustible smoking-related outcomes, yet little research has identified mechanisms underlying such relations. It may be that negative-affect-related transdiagnostic factors such as emotion dysregulation, anxiety sensitivity, and/or distress intolerance play a mechanistic role in the cannabis-tobacco interrelations.

Methods: The current study tested this hypothesis among 400 adults who endorsed dual use, 33% of whom endorsed current (past 3 months) cannabis use. We conducted analyses of variance and indirect effects model using the PROCESS v4.1 macro in SPSS version 29.

Results: Results indicated that participants who use cannabis reported greater difficulty with emotion regulation, anxiety sensitivity, and cigarette dependence severity. Cannabis use was related to cigarette dependence severity indirectly via difficulty with emotion regulation and anxiety sensitivity.

Discussion and conclusions: These results indicate that specific transdiagnostic negative-affect-related factors of difficulty with emotion regulation and anxiety sensitivity are associated with cannabis use among adults who smoke combustible and electronic cigarettes.

Scientific significance: Given that these transdiagnostic factors are malleable, these findings suggest targeting and engaging such mechanisms may offer novel behavioral change strategies for this high-risk population.