首页 > 最新文献

Anesthesia, Essays and Researches最新文献

英文 中文
Comparison of Hemoglobin Values Obtained by Arterial Blood Gas Analysis versus Laboratory Method during Major Head-and-Neck Surgeries. 头颈部大手术中动脉血气分析与实验室方法测定血红蛋白值的比较。
Pub Date : 2022-01-01 Epub Date: 2022-06-27 DOI: 10.4103/aer.aer_67_22
Sunil Rajan, Pulak Tosh, Maria Isaac, Niranjan Kumar Sasikumar, Avanthi Subramanian, Jerry Paul, Lakshmi Kumar

Background: Accuracy of hemoglobin (Hb) measured by arterial blood gas (ABG) analyzer is considered inferior to laboratory (lab) measurements as it could overestimate Hb levels.

Aim of the study: The study aims to compare Hb measured using ABG versus conventional lab method at the time of major blood loss and in the preoperative and immediate postoperative periods.

Settings and design: It was a prospective, nonrandomized observational study conducted in a tertiary care center.

Materials and methods: The study was conducted in 24 patients undergoing major head-and-neck surgeries. Simultaneous blood samples were sent for Hb measurement by ABG analysis and lab method at induction of anesthesia, when intraoperative blood loss exceeded maximum allowable blood loss, and in the immediate postoperative period.

Statistical analysis used: Chi-square test, independent sample's t-test, and paired t-test were used for statistical analysis.

Results: Mean Hb values obtained by both techniques were significantly different at all time points. Hb obtained by ABG analysis was significantly higher than lab value preoperatively (12.78 ± 2.51 vs. 12.05 ± 2.2, P = 0.038), at maximum blood loss (11.00 ± 2.57 vs. 9.87 ± 2.06, P = 0.006), and in the immediate postoperative period (11.96 ± 2.00 vs. 10.96 ± 2.24 P < 0.001). ABG Hb values were found to be approximately 1 g.dL-1 greater than lab values.

Conclusion: Hb measured by ABG analysis was significantly higher than that measured by lab method at the time of major blood loss, preoperatively, and at the immediate postoperative period in patients undergoing major head-and-neck surgeries, with a good correlation of values obtained by both the techniques.

背景:动脉血气(ABG)分析仪测量血红蛋白(Hb)的准确性被认为不如实验室(实验室)测量,因为它可能高估Hb水平。研究目的:该研究旨在比较ABG与传统实验室方法在大失血时以及术前和术后立即测量的Hb。背景和设计:这是一项在三级保健中心进行的前瞻性、非随机观察性研究。材料与方法:研究对象为24例接受重大头颈部手术的患者。在麻醉诱导、术中失血量超过最大允许失血量时和术后即刻,同时送血进行ABG分析和实验室法测定Hb。统计学方法:采用卡方检验、独立样本t检验、配对t检验进行统计学分析。结果:两种方法获得的平均Hb值在各时间点均有显著差异。ABG分析获得的Hb显著高于术前(12.78±2.51比12.05±2.2,P = 0.038)、最大失血量时(11.00±2.57比9.87±2.06,P = 0.006)和术后即刻(11.96±2.00比10.96±2.24 P < 0.001)的实验室值。ABG - Hb值比实验室值高约1 g.dL-1。结论:在头颈部大手术患者大失血时、术前及术后即刻,ABG分析法测得的Hb值明显高于实验室法测得的Hb值,两种方法测得的值具有良好的相关性。
{"title":"Comparison of Hemoglobin Values Obtained by Arterial Blood Gas Analysis versus Laboratory Method during Major Head-and-Neck Surgeries.","authors":"Sunil Rajan,&nbsp;Pulak Tosh,&nbsp;Maria Isaac,&nbsp;Niranjan Kumar Sasikumar,&nbsp;Avanthi Subramanian,&nbsp;Jerry Paul,&nbsp;Lakshmi Kumar","doi":"10.4103/aer.aer_67_22","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.4103/aer.aer_67_22","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Accuracy of hemoglobin (Hb) measured by arterial blood gas (ABG) analyzer is considered inferior to laboratory (lab) measurements as it could overestimate Hb levels.</p><p><strong>Aim of the study: </strong>The study aims to compare Hb measured using ABG versus conventional lab method at the time of major blood loss and in the preoperative and immediate postoperative periods.</p><p><strong>Settings and design: </strong>It was a prospective, nonrandomized observational study conducted in a tertiary care center.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>The study was conducted in 24 patients undergoing major head-and-neck surgeries. Simultaneous blood samples were sent for Hb measurement by ABG analysis and lab method at induction of anesthesia, when intraoperative blood loss exceeded maximum allowable blood loss, and in the immediate postoperative period.</p><p><strong>Statistical analysis used: </strong>Chi-square test, independent sample's <i>t</i>-test, and paired <i>t</i>-test were used for statistical analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Mean Hb values obtained by both techniques were significantly different at all time points. Hb obtained by ABG analysis was significantly higher than lab value preoperatively (12.78 ± 2.51 vs. 12.05 ± 2.2, <i>P</i> = 0.038), at maximum blood loss (11.00 ± 2.57 vs. 9.87 ± 2.06, <i>P</i> = 0.006), and in the immediate postoperative period (11.96 ± 2.00 vs. 10.96 ± 2.24 <i>P</i> < 0.001). ABG Hb values were found to be approximately 1 g.dL<sup>-1</sup> greater than lab values.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Hb measured by ABG analysis was significantly higher than that measured by lab method at the time of major blood loss, preoperatively, and at the immediate postoperative period in patients undergoing major head-and-neck surgeries, with a good correlation of values obtained by both the techniques.</p>","PeriodicalId":7798,"journal":{"name":"Anesthesia, Essays and Researches","volume":"16 1","pages":"84-88"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9558660/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"33516253","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Comparison of Hemodynamic Changes in Patients Undergoing Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy using rocuronium and vecuronium for Intubation and Maintenance under General Anesthesia. 罗库溴铵与维库溴铵在全麻下插管维持腹腔镜胆囊切除术患者血流动力学变化的比较。
Pub Date : 2022-01-01 Epub Date: 2022-07-06 DOI: 10.4103/aer.aer_70_22
Nikhita Juneja, Md Shahbaz Alam, Vipin Kumar Varshney, Pratiksha Gogia, Mukesh Kumar Prasad, Gurdeep Singh Jheetay

Context: The context of the study is to compare and find better muscle relaxant between rocuronium and vecuronium for intubation and maintenance under general anesthesia in patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy.

Aims: The aim of the study is to measure intubating condition, hemodynamic changes during intubation and also during maintenance of general anesthesia and to record complications, if any.

Settings and design: A prospective clinical study conducted in the Department of Anesthesiology in tertiary care center.

Materials and methods: A total of 100 patients of the American Society of Anesthesiologists Classes Grade I and II were planned for laparoscopic cholecystectomy were divided into two groups of 50 each. The subjects in the control and study group were put under anesthesia using injection propofol 2.0 mg.kg-1 along with injection vecuronium 0.10 mg.kg-1 and injection propofol 2.0 mg.kg-1 along with injection rocuronium 0.60 mg.kg-1, respectively. Hemodynamic monitoring and oxygen saturation (SPO2) were recorded at various intervals.

Statistical analysis used: All the collected data were imported into Microsoft Excel, and the statistical analysis was done by using SPSS 25.0 version.

Results: The mean heart rate before and after carboperitoneum at different time intervals and before and after extubation was significantly lower in vecuronium group. The mean systolic blood pressure and mean arterial pressure at 1 and 5 minutes after extubation were significantly more among vecuronium group.

Conclusions: Rocuronium is reasonably cardiostable, produces excellent intubation conditions, has a shorter duration of action, and shows minimal cumulative effect.

背景:本研究的背景是比较罗库溴铵和维库溴铵在腹腔镜胆囊切除术患者全身麻醉下插管和维持中更好的肌肉松弛剂。目的:本研究的目的是测量插管状态,插管期间和全身麻醉维持期间的血流动力学变化,并记录任何并发症。环境与设计:一项在三级医疗中心麻醉科进行的前瞻性临床研究。材料与方法:选取美国麻醉医师学会I级和II级计划行腹腔镜胆囊切除术的患者100例,分为两组,每组50例。对照组和研究组均注射异丙酚2.0 mg麻醉。Kg-1同时注射维库溴铵0.10 mg。Kg-1,注射异丙酚2.0 mg。Kg-1随注射罗库溴铵0.60 mg。公斤,分别。在不同时间间隔记录血流动力学监测和血氧饱和度(SPO2)。采用的统计分析方法:将收集到的所有数据导入Microsoft Excel中,使用SPSS 25.0版本进行统计分析。结果:维库溴铵组在不同时间间隔的碳腹腔注射前后及拔管前后平均心率均显著降低。拔管后1、5分钟,维库溴铵组平均收缩压和平均动脉压明显高于对照组。结论:罗库溴铵具有较好的心脏稳定性,具有良好的插管条件,作用时间短,累积效应小。
{"title":"Comparison of Hemodynamic Changes in Patients Undergoing Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy using rocuronium and vecuronium for Intubation and Maintenance under General Anesthesia.","authors":"Nikhita Juneja,&nbsp;Md Shahbaz Alam,&nbsp;Vipin Kumar Varshney,&nbsp;Pratiksha Gogia,&nbsp;Mukesh Kumar Prasad,&nbsp;Gurdeep Singh Jheetay","doi":"10.4103/aer.aer_70_22","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.4103/aer.aer_70_22","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Context: </strong>The context of the study is to compare and find better muscle relaxant between rocuronium and vecuronium for intubation and maintenance under general anesthesia in patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy.</p><p><strong>Aims: </strong>The aim of the study is to measure intubating condition, hemodynamic changes during intubation and also during maintenance of general anesthesia and to record complications, if any.</p><p><strong>Settings and design: </strong>A prospective clinical study conducted in the Department of Anesthesiology in tertiary care center.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>A total of 100 patients of the American Society of Anesthesiologists Classes Grade I and II were planned for laparoscopic cholecystectomy were divided into two groups of 50 each. The subjects in the control and study group were put under anesthesia using injection propofol 2.0 mg.kg<sup>-1</sup> along with injection vecuronium 0.10 mg.kg<sup>-1</sup> and injection propofol 2.0 mg.kg<sup>-1</sup> along with injection rocuronium 0.60 mg.kg<sup>-1</sup>, respectively. Hemodynamic monitoring and oxygen saturation (SPO<sub>2</sub>) were recorded at various intervals.</p><p><strong>Statistical analysis used: </strong>All the collected data were imported into Microsoft Excel, and the statistical analysis was done by using SPSS 25.0 version.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The mean heart rate before and after carboperitoneum at different time intervals and before and after extubation was significantly lower in vecuronium group. The mean systolic blood pressure and mean arterial pressure at 1 and 5 minutes after extubation were significantly more among vecuronium group.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Rocuronium is reasonably cardiostable, produces excellent intubation conditions, has a shorter duration of action, and shows minimal cumulative effect.</p>","PeriodicalId":7798,"journal":{"name":"Anesthesia, Essays and Researches","volume":"16 1","pages":"133-137"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9558651/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"33516647","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Laryngoscopic View after Application of Manual In-Line Stabilization - A Comparison with Early Morning Sniffing Position in the Same Patient. 应用手动在线稳定后的喉镜观察-与同一患者清晨嗅位的比较。
Pub Date : 2022-01-01 Epub Date: 2022-06-29 DOI: 10.4103/aer.aer_36_22
Sauharda Bikram Karki, Suniti Kale, Deepti Saigal

Background: The application of manual in-line stabilization (MILS) for minimizing spinal cord injury is known to increase difficulty in airway management.

Aim: The study aims to assess the change in Modified Cormack-Lehane (CL) laryngoscopic view with the application of MILS from the early morning sniffing position (EMSP) in adult patients.

Setting and design: This was a prospective, interventional, self-controlled study conducted on 220 patients aged 18-65 years, belonging to the American Society of Anesthesiologists Physical Status Class I or II, having a normal airway, and scheduled for elective surgery under general anesthesia.

Materials and methods: After inducing general anesthesia, MILS was applied to the patient's neck, and a Modified CL view of the vocal cords was recorded under direct laryngoscopy. The view was again noted after applying backward-upward-rightward pressure (BURP). MILS and BURP were released. The view was obtained again with and without BURP in EMSP.

Statistical analysis: Normality of data was tested by Kolmogorov-Smirnov test. Wilcoxon ranked-sum test for quantitative variables and Chi-square test for qualitative variables were used.

Results: On application of MILS, the majority of patients had Modified CL Grade 3a (121 patients) and 3b (53 patients) views. The majority of patients had Modified CL Grade 1 (114 patients) and 2a (71 patients) views on placing in EMSP. These findings were statistically significant (P < 0.0001). Consequent to the placement of BURP upon MILS, patients with lower CL Grade views (2b: 101 patients) were significantly higher (P < 0.0001) in comparison with MILS alone.

Conclusion: In patients with a normal airway, MILS leads to a significantly greater incidence of higher grades of laryngoscopic views in comparison to EMSP. Use of BURP after MILS causes significantly less incidence of higher grades of laryngoscopic view when compared with MILS alone. All patients requiring MILS should be considered to be a difficult airway, and hence, preparation should be done accordingly.

背景:为了减少脊髓损伤,使用手动在线稳定(MILS)增加了气道管理的难度。目的:探讨改良Cormack-Lehane (CL)喉镜下清晨嗅探体位(EMSP)应用MILS对成人患者的改变。背景和设计:这是一项前瞻性、介入性、自我控制的研究,研究对象为220例年龄18-65岁的患者,属于美国麻醉医师协会身体状态I级或II级,气道正常,计划在全身麻醉下进行择期手术。材料和方法:诱导全身麻醉后,在患者颈部应用MILS,在直接喉镜下记录声带改良CL视图。在施加反向向上右压(BURP)后再次记录该视图。释放MILS和BURP。在EMSP中再次获得了有无BURP的视图。统计分析:采用Kolmogorov-Smirnov检验检验数据的正态性。定量变量采用Wilcoxon秩和检验,定性变量采用卡方检验。结果:应用MILS时,大多数患者为改良CL 3a(121例)和3b(53例)视图。大多数患者对放置EMSP的看法为改良CL 1级(114例)和2a级(71例)。这些结果具有统计学意义(P < 0.0001)。在MILS上放置BURP后,与单独的MILS相比,CL分级视图较低的患者(2b: 101例患者)显著增加(P < 0.0001)。结论:在气道正常的患者中,与EMSP相比,MILS导致更高级别喉镜视图的发生率显著增加。与单纯的MILS相比,MILS术后使用BURP可显著减少高分级喉镜观察的发生率。所有需要MILS的患者应考虑为困难气道,因此,应相应地做好准备。
{"title":"Laryngoscopic View after Application of Manual In-Line Stabilization - A Comparison with Early Morning Sniffing Position in the Same Patient.","authors":"Sauharda Bikram Karki,&nbsp;Suniti Kale,&nbsp;Deepti Saigal","doi":"10.4103/aer.aer_36_22","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.4103/aer.aer_36_22","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The application of manual in-line stabilization (MILS) for minimizing spinal cord injury is known to increase difficulty in airway management.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>The study aims to assess the change in Modified Cormack-Lehane (CL) laryngoscopic view with the application of MILS from the early morning sniffing position (EMSP) in adult patients.</p><p><strong>Setting and design: </strong>This was a prospective, interventional, self-controlled study conducted on 220 patients aged 18-65 years, belonging to the American Society of Anesthesiologists Physical Status Class I or II, having a normal airway, and scheduled for elective surgery under general anesthesia.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>After inducing general anesthesia, MILS was applied to the patient's neck, and a Modified CL view of the vocal cords was recorded under direct laryngoscopy. The view was again noted after applying backward-upward-rightward pressure (BURP). MILS and BURP were released. The view was obtained again with and without BURP in EMSP.</p><p><strong>Statistical analysis: </strong>Normality of data was tested by Kolmogorov-Smirnov test. Wilcoxon ranked-sum test for quantitative variables and Chi-square test for qualitative variables were used.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>On application of MILS, the majority of patients had Modified CL Grade 3a (121 patients) and 3b (53 patients) views. The majority of patients had Modified CL Grade 1 (114 patients) and 2a (71 patients) views on placing in EMSP. These findings were statistically significant (<i>P</i> < 0.0001). Consequent to the placement of BURP upon MILS, patients with lower CL Grade views (2b: 101 patients) were significantly higher (<i>P</i> < 0.0001) in comparison with MILS alone.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>In patients with a normal airway, MILS leads to a significantly greater incidence of higher grades of laryngoscopic views in comparison to EMSP. Use of BURP after MILS causes significantly less incidence of higher grades of laryngoscopic view when compared with MILS alone. All patients requiring MILS should be considered to be a difficult airway, and hence, preparation should be done accordingly.</p>","PeriodicalId":7798,"journal":{"name":"Anesthesia, Essays and Researches","volume":"16 1","pages":"115-120"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9558680/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"33516258","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Comparison of LMA Supreme, i-gel, and Baska Mask for Airway Management during Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy: A Prospective Randomized Comparative Study from North India. LMA Supreme, i-gel和Baska面罩在腹腔镜胆囊切除术中气道管理的比较:一项来自北印度的前瞻性随机比较研究。
Pub Date : 2022-01-01 Epub Date: 2022-06-14 DOI: 10.4103/aer.aer_23_22
Parul Sharma, Sujeet Rai, Manoj Tripathi, Deepak Malviya, Sumita Kumari, Smarika Mishra

Background: The supraglottic airway device (SAD) has proved to be an appropriate alternative to endotracheal intubation in laparoscopic surgeries owing to various advantages, namely, decreased airway manipulation and stable hemodynamics.

Aims: We compared the efficacy in terms of oropharyngeal leak pressure (OLP) and safety of laryngeal mask airway (LMA)-Supreme (LMA-S), i-gel, and Baska mask in patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy.

Settings and design: Ninety patients posted for elective laparoscopic cholecystectomy were selected for a prospective randomized comparative study in a tertiary care center.

Materials and methods: The study comprised three groups of 30 each based on the different SADs used Group-LS with LMA-Supreme, Group-IG with i-gel, and Group-BM with Baska mask. The secondary objectives were device insertion time, ease of insertion, changes in the peak airway pressure (PAP), heart rate, mean arterial pressure, and airway complications (sore throat, dysphagia. dysphonia, lip/tongue or dental injury, etc.) between three groups.

Statistical analysis: The quantitative data were analyzed using the one-way analysis of variance test and Bonferroni post hoc multiple comparison test. Qualitative data were compared using Chi.squared test.

Results: OLP was significantly higher (P = 0.005) in the Baska mask than i-gel and LMA-S groups just after insertion and during carboperitonium. There was no significant difference in time for device insertion, number of attempts, ease of insertion, and use of manipulation (P > 0.05). However, the gastric tube insertion time was significantly lower in Group BM (9.59 ± 2.78) than Group IG with 12.79 ± 3.47 and Group LS with 10.84 ± 3.68 (P < 0.05). There were no significant differences between the groups with regard to changes in the PAP, heart rate, mean arterial pressure at different time intervals, and complications.

Conclusion: Baska mask provided a significantly higher OLP compared to i-gel and LMA-S without significant airway morbidity in laparoscopic surgeries.

背景:声门上气道装置(SAD)由于其减少气道操作和血流动力学稳定等优点,已被证明是腹腔镜手术中气管内插管的合适替代方案。目的:我们比较了喉罩(LMA)-Supreme (LMA- s)、i-gel和Baska面罩在腹腔镜胆囊切除术患者口咽漏压(OLP)和安全性方面的疗效。背景和设计:选择90例择期腹腔镜胆囊切除术患者在三级医疗中心进行前瞻性随机比较研究。材料和方法:根据不同的SADs分为三组,每组30人,分别使用Group-LS组与LMA-Supreme, Group-IG组与i-gel, Group-BM组与Baska mask。次要目标是器械插入时间、插入难易程度、气道峰值压(PAP)的变化、心率、平均动脉压和气道并发症(喉咙痛、吞咽困难)。发音障碍、唇/舌或牙齿损伤等)。统计分析:定量资料采用单因素方差检验和Bonferroni事后多重比较检验进行分析。定性资料用Chi进行比较。方测试。结果:Baska面罩组的OLP明显高于i-gel组和LMA-S组(P = 0.005)。两组患者植针时间、植针次数、植针难易程度、手法使用差异无统计学意义(P > 0.05)。BM组胃管插入时间(9.59±2.78)明显低于IG组(12.79±3.47)和LS组(10.84±3.68)(P < 0.05)。两组间PAP、心率、不同时间间隔平均动脉压变化及并发症无显著差异。结论:Baska面罩在腹腔镜手术中提供的OLP明显高于i-gel和LMA-S,且无明显气道并发症。
{"title":"Comparison of LMA Supreme, i-gel, and Baska Mask for Airway Management during Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy: A Prospective Randomized Comparative Study from North India.","authors":"Parul Sharma,&nbsp;Sujeet Rai,&nbsp;Manoj Tripathi,&nbsp;Deepak Malviya,&nbsp;Sumita Kumari,&nbsp;Smarika Mishra","doi":"10.4103/aer.aer_23_22","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.4103/aer.aer_23_22","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The supraglottic airway device (SAD) has proved to be an appropriate alternative to endotracheal intubation in laparoscopic surgeries owing to various advantages, namely, decreased airway manipulation and stable hemodynamics.</p><p><strong>Aims: </strong>We compared the efficacy in terms of oropharyngeal leak pressure (OLP) and safety of laryngeal mask airway (LMA)-Supreme (LMA-S), i-gel, and Baska mask in patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy.</p><p><strong>Settings and design: </strong>Ninety patients posted for elective laparoscopic cholecystectomy were selected for a prospective randomized comparative study in a tertiary care center.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>The study comprised three groups of 30 each based on the different SADs used Group-LS with LMA-Supreme, Group-IG with i-gel, and Group-BM with Baska mask. The secondary objectives were device insertion time, ease of insertion, changes in the peak airway pressure (PAP), heart rate, mean arterial pressure, and airway complications (sore throat, dysphagia. dysphonia, lip/tongue or dental injury, etc.) between three groups.</p><p><strong>Statistical analysis: </strong>The quantitative data were analyzed using the one-way analysis of variance test and Bonferroni <i>post hoc</i> multiple comparison test. Qualitative data were compared using Chi.squared test.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>OLP was significantly higher (<i>P</i> = 0.005) in the Baska mask than i-gel and LMA-S groups just after insertion and during carboperitonium. There was no significant difference in time for device insertion, number of attempts, ease of insertion, and use of manipulation (<i>P</i> > 0.05). However, the gastric tube insertion time was significantly lower in Group BM (9.59 ± 2.78) than Group IG with 12.79 ± 3.47 and Group LS with 10.84 ± 3.68 (<i>P</i> < 0.05). There were no significant differences between the groups with regard to changes in the PAP, heart rate, mean arterial pressure at different time intervals, and complications.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Baska mask provided a significantly higher OLP compared to i-gel and LMA-S without significant airway morbidity in laparoscopic surgeries.</p>","PeriodicalId":7798,"journal":{"name":"Anesthesia, Essays and Researches","volume":"16 1","pages":"42-48"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9558661/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"33516259","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1
Comparison of the Effectiveness of Two-Handed Mask Ventilation Techniques (C-E versus V-E) in Obese Patients Requiring General Anesthesia in an Indian Population. 双手口罩通气技术(C-E与V-E)在印度人群中需要全身麻醉的肥胖患者中的有效性比较
Pub Date : 2022-01-01 Epub Date: 2022-08-09 DOI: 10.4103/aer.aer_59_22
Meghana S Bharadwaj, Mamta Sharma, Shobha Purohit, Anie Joseph

Background: Two-handed mask ventilation techniques are often used in cases of difficult mask ventilation scenarios. A comparison of two methods of two-handed techniques in terms of tidal volume was undertaken in the context of the obese population.

Aims and objectives: To determine and compare the effectiveness of mask ventilation in obese Indian adult subjects by using either the C-E technique or the V-E technique after induction of general anaesthesia.

Material and methods: This was a randomised interventional study conducted on eighty obese patients. They were randomized into Group A ventilated with C-E technique and Group B with V-E technique. Expired tidal volume (VTe), Peak inspiratory pressure (PIP), SpO2, EtCO2 and vital signs were noted.

Results: The BMI and hemodynamic parameters were comparable between the two groups. The expired tidal volume of 702 ± 77 mL with the V-E technique was significantly more than the C-E technique, which was 492 ± 71 mL. The ventilatory failure rate with the C-E technique was 15% and 0% with the V-E technique. There was no significant difference between the peak airway pressures for the two techniques: 20.3 ± 1.5 mm H2O for Group A and 20.5 ± 1.2 mm H2O for Group B.

Conclusions: Mask ventilation with the two-handed V-E technique is associated with better tidal volumes and reduced failure rates in the obese population. So the V-E technique should be attempted first as a rescue measure in obese adult patients if the return of spontaneous breathing and tracheal intubation is impossible.

背景:双手口罩通气技术常用于口罩通气困难的情况。两种方法的双手技术潮汐量方面的比较进行了在肥胖人群的背景下。目的和目的:确定和比较在全麻诱导后使用C-E技术或V-E技术对肥胖印度成年受试者进行面罩通气的有效性。材料和方法:这是一项对80例肥胖患者进行的随机介入性研究。随机分为C-E通气组和V-E通气组。记录过期潮气量(VTe)、吸气峰值压(PIP)、SpO2、EtCO2及生命体征。结果:两组患者的BMI和血流动力学参数具有可比性。V-E技术的过期潮气量为702±77 mL,明显高于C-E技术的492±71 mL, C-E技术的通气失败率为15%,V-E技术的通气失败率为0%。两种技术的气道压力峰值A组为20.3±1.5 mm H2O, b组为20.5±1.2 mm H2O,差异无统计学意义。结论:双手V-E技术面罩通气在肥胖人群中具有更好的潮气量和更低的失败率。因此,对于无法恢复自主呼吸和气管插管的肥胖成人患者,应首先尝试V-E技术作为一种抢救措施。
{"title":"Comparison of the Effectiveness of Two-Handed Mask Ventilation Techniques (C-E versus V-E) in Obese Patients Requiring General Anesthesia in an Indian Population.","authors":"Meghana S Bharadwaj,&nbsp;Mamta Sharma,&nbsp;Shobha Purohit,&nbsp;Anie Joseph","doi":"10.4103/aer.aer_59_22","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.4103/aer.aer_59_22","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Two-handed mask ventilation techniques are often used in cases of difficult mask ventilation scenarios. A comparison of two methods of two-handed techniques in terms of tidal volume was undertaken in the context of the obese population.</p><p><strong>Aims and objectives: </strong>To determine and compare the effectiveness of mask ventilation in obese Indian adult subjects by using either the C-E technique or the V-E technique after induction of general anaesthesia.</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>This was a randomised interventional study conducted on eighty obese patients. They were randomized into Group A ventilated with C-E technique and Group B with V-E technique. Expired tidal volume (VTe), Peak inspiratory pressure (PIP), SpO<sub>2</sub>, EtCO<sub>2</sub> and vital signs were noted.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The BMI and hemodynamic parameters were comparable between the two groups. The expired tidal volume of 702 ± 77 mL with the V-E technique was significantly more than the C-E technique, which was 492 ± 71 mL. The ventilatory failure rate with the C-E technique was 15% and 0% with the V-E technique. There was no significant difference between the peak airway pressures for the two techniques: 20.3 ± 1.5 mm H<sub>2</sub>O for Group A and 20.5 ± 1.2 mm H<sub>2</sub>O for Group B.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Mask ventilation with the two-handed V-E technique is associated with better tidal volumes and reduced failure rates in the obese population. So the V-E technique should be attempted first as a rescue measure in obese adult patients if the return of spontaneous breathing and tracheal intubation is impossible.</p>","PeriodicalId":7798,"journal":{"name":"Anesthesia, Essays and Researches","volume":"16 1","pages":"167-171"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9558676/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"33544723","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
A Study to Evaluate the Efficacy of Dexamethasone as an Adjuvant in Ultrasound-Guided Bilateral Superficial Cervical Plexus Block using 0.25% Bupivacaine in Patients Undergoing Thyroid Surgeries under Entropy-Guided General Anesthesia. 评价地塞米松辅助0.25%布比卡因超声引导双侧颈浅丛阻滞在熵引导全麻下甲状腺手术患者中的疗效
Pub Date : 2022-01-01 Epub Date: 2022-07-06 DOI: 10.4103/aer.aer_85_21
M N Satish Kumar, M Archana, V P Dayananda, C Surekha, R Ramachandraiah

Context: Ultrasound-guided bilateral superficial cervical plexus block (BSCPB) is a technique described for thyroid surgeries for postoperative analgesia as the surgery can cause severe pain and discomfort. Perineural dexamethasone is known to prolong analgesic duration and reduce postoperative nausea/vomiting.

Aims: To assess the efficacy of dexamethasone as an adjuvant to BSCPB with 0.25% bupivacaine on isoflurane consumption, intraoperative hemodynamic parameters, and postoperative analgesia in patients undergoing thyroid surgeries under general anesthesia.

Settings and design: This was a randomized control trial.

Subjects and methods: Eighty patients were randomized to two equal groups using random number table into Group A with BSCPB receiving 20 mL of 0.25% bupivacaine and Group B with BSCPB receiving 19 mL of 0.25% bupivacaine + injection dexamethasone 4 mg in the preinduction period. Hemodynamic parameters, isoflurane consumption, postoperative visual analog scale (VAS) score, and antiemetic effect over 24 h were compared between two groups.

Statistical analysis used: Microsoft excel data sheet, Chi-square test, and independent t-test were used for statistical analysis.

Results: The intraoperative hemodynamic parameters were comparable between the two groups. There was a significant difference in mean VAS score between two groups from 6 h to 20 h postoperatively. The time of rescue analgesic in Group A was 7.09 ± 1.04 min and Group was 13.19 ± 1.46 min with P < 0.0001. In Group A, 40% had nausea and 35% had vomiting, and in Group B, 7.5% had nausea and 5% had vomiting.

Conclusions: Preinduction ultrasound-guided BSCPB with bupivacaine and dexamethasone provides longer duration of postoperative analgesia and lesser nausea and vomiting compared to bupivacaine alone.

背景:超声引导双侧颈浅丛阻滞(BSCPB)是一种用于甲状腺手术术后镇痛的技术,因为手术会引起严重的疼痛和不适。已知神经周地塞米松可延长镇痛时间并减少术后恶心/呕吐。目的:评价地塞米松辅助0.25%布比卡因BSCPB对全麻下甲状腺手术患者异氟烷消耗、术中血流动力学参数和术后镇痛的影响。设置和设计:这是一项随机对照试验。对象和方法:80例患者采用随机数字表法随机分为两组,A组患者接受0.25%布比卡因20 mL, B组患者接受0.25%布比卡因19 mL +注射地塞米松4 mg。比较两组患者血液动力学参数、异氟醚消耗量、术后视觉模拟评分(VAS)及24 h止吐效果。统计分析方法:采用Microsoft excel数据表、卡方检验、独立t检验进行统计分析。结果:两组患者术中血流动力学参数具有可比性。两组患者术后6 ~ 20 h VAS评分差异有统计学意义。A组抢救镇痛时间为7.09±1.04 min, A组为13.19±1.46 min, P < 0.0001。A组40%恶心,35%呕吐,B组7.5%恶心,5%呕吐。结论:与单独布比卡因相比,超声引导下布比卡因联合地塞米松的BSCPB术后镇痛持续时间更长,恶心和呕吐更少。
{"title":"A Study to Evaluate the Efficacy of Dexamethasone as an Adjuvant in Ultrasound-Guided Bilateral Superficial Cervical Plexus Block using 0.25% Bupivacaine in Patients Undergoing Thyroid Surgeries under Entropy-Guided General Anesthesia.","authors":"M N Satish Kumar,&nbsp;M Archana,&nbsp;V P Dayananda,&nbsp;C Surekha,&nbsp;R Ramachandraiah","doi":"10.4103/aer.aer_85_21","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.4103/aer.aer_85_21","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Context: </strong>Ultrasound-guided bilateral superficial cervical plexus block (BSCPB) is a technique described for thyroid surgeries for postoperative analgesia as the surgery can cause severe pain and discomfort. Perineural dexamethasone is known to prolong analgesic duration and reduce postoperative nausea/vomiting.</p><p><strong>Aims: </strong>To assess the efficacy of dexamethasone as an adjuvant to BSCPB with 0.25% bupivacaine on isoflurane consumption, intraoperative hemodynamic parameters, and postoperative analgesia in patients undergoing thyroid surgeries under general anesthesia.</p><p><strong>Settings and design: </strong>This was a randomized control trial.</p><p><strong>Subjects and methods: </strong>Eighty patients were randomized to two equal groups using random number table into Group A with BSCPB receiving 20 mL of 0.25% bupivacaine and Group B with BSCPB receiving 19 mL of 0.25% bupivacaine + injection dexamethasone 4 mg in the preinduction period. Hemodynamic parameters, isoflurane consumption, postoperative visual analog scale (VAS) score, and antiemetic effect over 24 h were compared between two groups.</p><p><strong>Statistical analysis used: </strong>Microsoft excel data sheet, Chi-square test, and independent <i>t</i>-test were used for statistical analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The intraoperative hemodynamic parameters were comparable between the two groups. There was a significant difference in mean VAS score between two groups from 6 h to 20 h postoperatively. The time of rescue analgesic in Group A was 7.09 ± 1.04 min and Group was 13.19 ± 1.46 min with <i>P</i> < 0.0001. In Group A, 40% had nausea and 35% had vomiting, and in Group B, 7.5% had nausea and 5% had vomiting.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Preinduction ultrasound-guided BSCPB with bupivacaine and dexamethasone provides longer duration of postoperative analgesia and lesser nausea and vomiting compared to bupivacaine alone.</p>","PeriodicalId":7798,"journal":{"name":"Anesthesia, Essays and Researches","volume":"16 1","pages":"127-132"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9558673/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"33544724","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Effect of Different Doses of Buprenorphine in Combination with Bupivacaine in the Management of Postoperative Analgesia: A Comparative Study. 不同剂量丁丙诺啡联合布比卡因治疗术后镇痛的比较研究。
Pub Date : 2022-01-01 Epub Date: 2022-07-06 DOI: 10.4103/aer.aer_39_22
Smitirupa Borkotoky, Daisy Karan, Swarna Banerjee, Prerna Biswal, Nupur Moda

Background: Longer duration of analgesia, ceiling effect on respiratory depression, and the antihyperalgesia property make buprenorphine a good adjuvant for managing moderate-to-severe postoperative pain.

Aims: The aim of this study is to evaluate the onset and duration of postoperative analgesia of three different doses of buprenorphine of 60, 100, and 150 μg given intrathecally along with hyperbaric bupivacaine in patients undergoing lower limb surgeries.

Setting and design: This prospective observational study was carried out in the anesthesia department of a tertiary care hospital.

Materials and methods: The study included 90 patients of either sex, aged 18-60 years, scheduled for elective lower limb surgery under subarachnoid block. Patients were randomly allocated into three groups (30 each) receiving different doses of buprenorphine. In addition, all patients received 3 mL of 0.5% hyperbaric bupivacaine.

Statistical analysis used: The Chi-square test or Fisher's exact test was used to find out the association between the categorical variables. The association of quantitative variables between the groups was assessed by Kruskal-Wallis test while within the groups was assessed by repeated-measures analysis of variance test.

Results: Baseline characteristics such as age, gender, and American Society of Anesthesiologist physical status classification were comparable among the three groups. Sensory block, motor block, and total duration of analgesia were significantly higher with higher doses of buprenorphine. The mean difference in the duration of analgesia was comparable in patients receiving 100 μg (720 min) and 150 μg (825 min) of buprenorphine. Bradycardia as a side effect was only in patients receiving 150 μg of buprenorphine.

Conclusion: Risk-benefit of different doses of buprenorphine suggests that 100 μg may be the ideal dose for a better quality of spinal block and maintaining hemodynamic stability.

背景:丁丙诺啡具有较长的镇痛时间,对呼吸抑制的抑制作用,以及抗痛觉过敏的特性,使丁丙诺啡成为治疗中重度术后疼痛的良好辅助药物。目的:观察丁丙诺啡(60、100、150 μg)与高压布比卡因联合应用于下肢手术患者的术后镇痛效果及持续时间。背景和设计:本前瞻性观察性研究在一家三级医院的麻醉科进行。材料与方法:本研究纳入90例选择性下肢蛛网膜下腔阻滞手术患者,男女不限,年龄18-60岁。患者被随机分为三组(每组30人),接受不同剂量的丁丙诺啡治疗。此外,所有患者均接受3ml 0.5%高压布比卡因。使用的统计分析:使用卡方检验或费雪精确检验来找出分类变量之间的关联。组间定量变量的相关性采用Kruskal-Wallis检验,组内定量变量的相关性采用重复测量方差分析检验。结果:三组患者的基线特征如年龄、性别和美国麻醉医师协会的身体状态分类具有可比性。丁丙诺啡剂量越大,感觉阻滞、运动阻滞和总镇痛时间越长。丁丙诺啡100 μg (720 min)和150 μg (825 min)组镇痛时间的平均差异相当。只有服用150 μg丁丙诺啡的患者才会出现心动过缓的副作用。结论:不同剂量丁丙诺啡的风险-收益分析表明,100 μg丁丙诺啡可能是提高脊髓阻滞质量和维持血流动力学稳定性的理想剂量。
{"title":"Effect of Different Doses of Buprenorphine in Combination with Bupivacaine in the Management of Postoperative Analgesia: A Comparative Study.","authors":"Smitirupa Borkotoky,&nbsp;Daisy Karan,&nbsp;Swarna Banerjee,&nbsp;Prerna Biswal,&nbsp;Nupur Moda","doi":"10.4103/aer.aer_39_22","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.4103/aer.aer_39_22","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Longer duration of analgesia, ceiling effect on respiratory depression, and the antihyperalgesia property make buprenorphine a good adjuvant for managing moderate-to-severe postoperative pain.</p><p><strong>Aims: </strong>The aim of this study is to evaluate the onset and duration of postoperative analgesia of three different doses of buprenorphine of 60, 100, and 150 μg given intrathecally along with hyperbaric bupivacaine in patients undergoing lower limb surgeries.</p><p><strong>Setting and design: </strong>This prospective observational study was carried out in the anesthesia department of a tertiary care hospital.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>The study included 90 patients of either sex, aged 18-60 years, scheduled for elective lower limb surgery under subarachnoid block. Patients were randomly allocated into three groups (30 each) receiving different doses of buprenorphine. In addition, all patients received 3 mL of 0.5% hyperbaric bupivacaine.</p><p><strong>Statistical analysis used: </strong>The Chi-square test or Fisher's exact test was used to find out the association between the categorical variables. The association of quantitative variables between the groups was assessed by Kruskal-Wallis test while within the groups was assessed by repeated-measures analysis of variance test.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Baseline characteristics such as age, gender, and American Society of Anesthesiologist physical status classification were comparable among the three groups. Sensory block, motor block, and total duration of analgesia were significantly higher with higher doses of buprenorphine. The mean difference in the duration of analgesia was comparable in patients receiving 100 μg (720 min) and 150 μg (825 min) of buprenorphine. Bradycardia as a side effect was only in patients receiving 150 μg of buprenorphine.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Risk-benefit of different doses of buprenorphine suggests that 100 μg may be the ideal dose for a better quality of spinal block and maintaining hemodynamic stability.</p>","PeriodicalId":7798,"journal":{"name":"Anesthesia, Essays and Researches","volume":"16 1","pages":"121-126"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9558662/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"33544726","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Comparison of Oral versus Intramuscular Clonidine for the Prolongation of Bupivacaine Spinal Anesthesia in Patients Undergoing Lower Abdominal and Lower Limb Surgeries. 下腹部和下肢手术患者口服与肌注可乐定延长布比卡因脊髓麻醉时间的比较。
Pub Date : 2022-01-01 Epub Date: 2022-06-29 DOI: 10.4103/aer.aer_31_22
Raj Bahadur Singh, Saurav Shekhar, Ranjeet Rana De, Siddharth Singh, Ritu Singh, Akrity Singh

Background: Spinal subarachnoid block (SAB) is the first choice anesthesia in lower abdominal and lower limb surgeries. It produces a varying degree of sensory analgesia, motor blockade, and sympathetic blockade depending on the dose, concentration, and volume of the local anesthetic given. This study was undertaken to assess the degree of sensory and motor block with 150 μg of oral versus intramuscular clonidine as an adjuvant to bupivacaine for spinal anesthesia.

Aims and objective: To compare the efficacy of oral versus intramuscular clonidine as an adjuvant to bupivacaine for the prolongation of sensory and motor block in patients undergoing lower abdominal and lower limb surgeries under SAB.

Materials and methods: After institutional ethical clearance, 90 patients were randomized into three groups scheduled for lower abdominal and lower limb surgeries under spinal anesthesia. • Group O: Bupivacaine 0.5% (heavy) 3.0 mL and oral clonidine 150 μg 1 h before spinal anesthesia. • Group I: Bupivacaine 0.5% (heavy) 3.0 mL and intramuscular clonidine 150 μg 1 h before spinal anesthesia. • Group C: Control group - 3 mL bupivacaine 0.5% (heavy) alone.

Result: The onset of sensory block in Group O was 4.9 ± 0.52 min, whereas in Group I, it was 4.6 ± 0.42 min than Group C (5.1 ± 0.60). Onset of motor block was also significantly lower in Group O and Group I (3.9 ± 0.53 and 3.7 ± 0.42 min) than in Group C (4.4 ± 0.6 min) which was a control group. There was also a significant difference in the duration of the sensory block between Group O (206.4 ± 9.2 min), Group I (219 ± 8.6 min), and Group C (184.3 ± 9.1 min). The duration of motor block was significantly higher in Group O (183.6 ± 8.2 min) and Group I (197.8 ± 9.6 min) when compared to Group C (162.8 ± 8.9 min). The timing of rescue analgesia in Group O was 222.4 ± 11.7 min, whereas in Group I, it was 243.46 ± 10.9.

Conclusion: On the basis of finding of our study, we conclude that the use of clonidine as a premedication at a dose of 150 μg significantly increased the duration of sensory block, motor block, and duration of analgesia and shortened the time of onset of sensory and motor blockade.

背景:脊髓蛛网膜下腔阻滞(SAB)是下腹部和下肢手术的首选麻醉方式。它产生不同程度的感觉镇痛、运动阻滞和交感阻滞,这取决于局部麻醉剂的剂量、浓度和体积。本研究旨在评估150 μg口服可乐定与肌肉注射可乐定作为布比卡因脊髓麻醉辅助剂对感觉和运动阻滞的程度。目的和目的:比较口服与肌注可乐定辅助布比卡因延长下腹部和下肢SAB手术患者感觉和运动阻滞的效果。材料与方法:90例患者经机构伦理审查后,随机分为三组,分别在脊髓麻醉下进行下腹部和下肢手术。O组:布比卡因0.5%(重)3.0 mL,脊髓麻醉前1 h口服可乐定150 μg。•第一组:腰麻前1 h布比卡因0.5%(重)3.0 mL,肌注可乐定150 μg。•C组:对照组:单独使用0.5%布比卡因(重)3ml。结果:O组感觉阻滞发生时间为4.9±0.52 min, I组为4.6±0.42 min,明显优于C组(5.1±0.60)min。运动阻滞发作时间(3.9±0.53 min)明显低于对照组C组(4.4±0.6 min)。感觉阻滞持续时间O组(206.4±9.2 min)、I组(219±8.6 min)和C组(184.3±9.1 min)也有显著差异。运动阻滞持续时间O组(183.6±8.2 min)和I组(197.8±9.6 min)明显高于C组(162.8±8.9 min)。O组抢救镇痛时间为222.4±11.7 min, I组为243.46±10.9 min。结论:在本研究的基础上,我们得出150 μg剂量的可乐定可显著增加感觉阻滞持续时间、运动阻滞持续时间和镇痛持续时间,缩短感觉阻滞和运动阻滞发生时间。
{"title":"Comparison of Oral versus Intramuscular Clonidine for the Prolongation of Bupivacaine Spinal Anesthesia in Patients Undergoing Lower Abdominal and Lower Limb Surgeries.","authors":"Raj Bahadur Singh,&nbsp;Saurav Shekhar,&nbsp;Ranjeet Rana De,&nbsp;Siddharth Singh,&nbsp;Ritu Singh,&nbsp;Akrity Singh","doi":"10.4103/aer.aer_31_22","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.4103/aer.aer_31_22","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Spinal subarachnoid block (SAB) is the first choice anesthesia in lower abdominal and lower limb surgeries. It produces a varying degree of sensory analgesia, motor blockade, and sympathetic blockade depending on the dose, concentration, and volume of the local anesthetic given. This study was undertaken to assess the degree of sensory and motor block with 150 μg of oral versus intramuscular clonidine as an adjuvant to bupivacaine for spinal anesthesia.</p><p><strong>Aims and objective: </strong>To compare the efficacy of oral versus intramuscular clonidine as an adjuvant to bupivacaine for the prolongation of sensory and motor block in patients undergoing lower abdominal and lower limb surgeries under SAB.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>After institutional ethical clearance, 90 patients were randomized into three groups scheduled for lower abdominal and lower limb surgeries under spinal anesthesia. • Group O: Bupivacaine 0.5% (heavy) 3.0 mL and oral clonidine 150 μg 1 h before spinal anesthesia. • Group I: Bupivacaine 0.5% (heavy) 3.0 mL and intramuscular clonidine 150 μg 1 h before spinal anesthesia. • Group C: Control group - 3 mL bupivacaine 0.5% (heavy) alone.</p><p><strong>Result: </strong>The onset of sensory block in Group O was 4.9 ± 0.52 min, whereas in Group I, it was 4.6 ± 0.42 min than Group C (5.1 ± 0.60). Onset of motor block was also significantly lower in Group O and Group I (3.9 ± 0.53 and 3.7 ± 0.42 min) than in Group C (4.4 ± 0.6 min) which was a control group. There was also a significant difference in the duration of the sensory block between Group O (206.4 ± 9.2 min), Group I (219 ± 8.6 min), and Group C (184.3 ± 9.1 min). The duration of motor block was significantly higher in Group O (183.6 ± 8.2 min) and Group I (197.8 ± 9.6 min) when compared to Group C (162.8 ± 8.9 min). The timing of rescue analgesia in Group O was 222.4 ± 11.7 min, whereas in Group I, it was 243.46 ± 10.9.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>On the basis of finding of our study, we conclude that the use of clonidine as a premedication at a dose of 150 μg significantly increased the duration of sensory block, motor block, and duration of analgesia and shortened the time of onset of sensory and motor blockade.</p>","PeriodicalId":7798,"journal":{"name":"Anesthesia, Essays and Researches","volume":"16 1","pages":"104-108"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9558664/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"33515806","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
A Clinical Comparison between Single-Space Technique and Double-Space Technique for Combined Spinal and Epidural Anesthesia. 单间隙技术与双间隙技术用于脊髓硬膜外联合麻醉的临床比较。
Pub Date : 2022-01-01 Epub Date: 2022-05-31 DOI: 10.4103/aer.aer_19_22
Pyarejan Basheer, G C Brijesh, Raman Kumar, Shailesh Kumar, Priyesh Kumar, Jay Prakash

Background: Combined spinal and epidural anesthesia (CSEA) is commonly performed by double space technique (DST) and single space segment technique (SST) or needle-through-needle technique (NNT).

Aims and objectives: We designed a double-blind randomized controlled study to compare the effect of the double-space technique with that of the single-space technique on time required by the procedure, the number of attempts, and a level of sensory, side effects and cost-effectiveness.

Materials and methods: Patients undergoing elective lower abdominal and lower limb surgeries under regional anesthesia were randomized to receive CSEA with either the double-space technique (double group, n = 30) or the single-space technique (single group, n = 30). In the single group, the procedure was performed at the L3-4 interspace using the needle-through-needle technique. In the double group, an epidural catheter was inserted at the L1-2 interspace, and dural puncture was performed at the L3-4 interspace.

Results: The single space (needle-through-needle) technique for CSE takes less time, less number of spinal punctures. There was no difference between the two groups in terms of side effects. Sensory level at T10 on 5 min in group I was 90% and group II was 100% whereas at T8 it was 10% in group I; sensory level at T10, T8 and T6 on 10 min. in group I were 53.3%, 43.3% and 3.3% respectively whereas in group II were 80%, 16.7% and 3.3% respectively; sensory level at T10, T8, T6 and T4 on 15 min. in group I were 6.7%, 43.3%, 50% and 0% respectively whereas in group II were 23.3%, 50%, 23.3% and 3.3% respectively; and sensory level at T4, T6 and T8 on 20 min. in group I were 0%, 73.3% and 26.7% respectively whereas in group II were 16.7%, 33.3% and 50% respectively.

Conclusions: Single-space (needle-through-needle) CSEA takes less time, less number of spinal punctures and results in improved patient satisfaction. There were no differences in intraoperative variables between the DST and SST for CSEA.

背景:脊髓硬膜外联合麻醉(CSEA)通常采用双间隙技术(DST)和单间隙段技术(SST)或穿刺针技术(NNT)。目的和目的:我们设计了一项双盲随机对照研究,比较双间距技术与单间距技术在手术所需时间、尝试次数、感觉水平、副作用和成本效益方面的效果。材料与方法:选择在区域麻醉下择期行下腹、下肢手术的患者,随机分为双腔术(双组,n = 30)和单腔术(单组,n = 30)两组。在单组中,使用穿针技术在L3-4间隙进行手术。双组在L1-2间隙置入硬膜外导管,L3-4间隙行硬膜穿刺。结果:单间隙(针穿针)穿刺术穿刺时间短,穿刺次数少。两组在副作用方面没有差异。第1组在T10时5分钟的感觉水平为90%,第2组为100%,第1组在T8时为10%;1组T10、T8、T6在10min时的感觉水平分别为53.3%、43.3%和3.3%,而II组分别为80%、16.7%和3.3%;15 min时,I组T10、T8、T6、T4的感觉水平分别为6.7%、43.3%、50%和0%,II组分别为23.3%、50%、23.3%和3.3%;20 min时T4、T6、T8的感觉水平I组分别为0%、73.3%、26.7%,II组分别为16.7%、33.3%、50%。结论:单间隙(针穿针)CSEA穿刺时间短,穿刺次数少,患者满意度提高。CSEA的DST和SST在术中变量上无差异。
{"title":"A Clinical Comparison between Single-Space Technique and Double-Space Technique for Combined Spinal and Epidural Anesthesia.","authors":"Pyarejan Basheer,&nbsp;G C Brijesh,&nbsp;Raman Kumar,&nbsp;Shailesh Kumar,&nbsp;Priyesh Kumar,&nbsp;Jay Prakash","doi":"10.4103/aer.aer_19_22","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.4103/aer.aer_19_22","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Combined spinal and epidural anesthesia (CSEA) is commonly performed by double space technique (DST) and single space segment technique (SST) or needle-through-needle technique (NNT).</p><p><strong>Aims and objectives: </strong>We designed a double-blind randomized controlled study to compare the effect of the double-space technique with that of the single-space technique on time required by the procedure, the number of attempts, and a level of sensory, side effects and cost-effectiveness.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>Patients undergoing elective lower abdominal and lower limb surgeries under regional anesthesia were randomized to receive CSEA with either the double-space technique (double group, <i>n</i> = 30) or the single-space technique (single group, <i>n</i> = 30). In the single group, the procedure was performed at the L3-4 interspace using the needle-through-needle technique. In the double group, an epidural catheter was inserted at the L1-2 interspace, and dural puncture was performed at the L3-4 interspace.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The single space (needle-through-needle) technique for CSE takes less time, less number of spinal punctures. There was no difference between the two groups in terms of side effects. Sensory level at T10 on 5 min in group I was 90% and group II was 100% whereas at T8 it was 10% in group I; sensory level at T10, T8 and T6 on 10 min. in group I were 53.3%, 43.3% and 3.3% respectively whereas in group II were 80%, 16.7% and 3.3% respectively; sensory level at T10, T8, T6 and T4 on 15 min. in group I were 6.7%, 43.3%, 50% and 0% respectively whereas in group II were 23.3%, 50%, 23.3% and 3.3% respectively; and sensory level at T4, T6 and T8 on 20 min. in group I were 0%, 73.3% and 26.7% respectively whereas in group II were 16.7%, 33.3% and 50% respectively.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Single-space (needle-through-needle) CSEA takes less time, less number of spinal punctures and results in improved patient satisfaction. There were no differences in intraoperative variables between the DST and SST for CSEA.</p>","PeriodicalId":7798,"journal":{"name":"Anesthesia, Essays and Researches","volume":"16 1","pages":"36-41"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9558652/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"33515807","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Premedication with Diclofenac and Precurarization with Atracurium on Succinylcholine-Induced Myalgia in Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy: A Double-Blinded Randomized Study. 双氯芬酸预用药和阿曲库铵预用药治疗腹腔镜胆囊切除术中琥珀胆碱引起的肌痛:一项双盲随机研究。
Pub Date : 2022-01-01 Epub Date: 2022-06-27 DOI: 10.4103/aer.aer_35_22
Amit Tirkey, Mukesh Kumar, Ekramul Haque, Tushar Kumar, Ladhu Lakra, Usha Suwalka

Background and aims: Succinylcholine is the only available depolarizing neuromuscular blocker that has been widely used in the induction of anesthesia, and it is the drug of choice for rapid-sequence induction of anesthesia due to its rapid onset of effect and ultrashort duration of action owing to its rapid hydrolysis by acetyl-cholinesterase. Postoperative muscle pain (myalgia) and muscle stiffness are the most common side effects and are observed most frequently on the 1st postoperative day in ambulatory surgery. The use of succinylcholine in the induction of anesthesia and intubation in routine cases has been discouraged because of such adverse effects. However, because of its cost-effectiveness and easy availability, it is still used by some institutions routinely. This study aimed to study the efficacy of preoperative diclofenac along with atracurium precurarization in alleviating succinylcholine-induced myalgia.

Materials and methods: It is a double-blind randomized comparative study carried out in a tertiary care hospital. The study sample was 60 and divided into two equal groups. All data entered in MS-Excel Sheet and Wilcoxon signed-rank test were done for nonparametric data and one-way ANOVA for the parametric data. The normal distribution of the study sample was tested by the Shapiro - Wilk test.

Results: The fasciculations in the test group were much less than in the control group with P < 0.00001. The results for the incidence of myalgia in the two groups were as follows: P value at 24 h was 0.00018 and at 48 h was 0.0028, respectively. Creatine kinase levels at preoperative and 24 h postoperative periods were 49.47 ± 7.24 in Group D, 53.30 ± 7.98 in Group B and 87.38 ± 15.16 in Group D, and 188.41 ± 33.27 in Group B, respectively.

Conclusion: Succinylcholine-induced myalgia has a complex pathophysiology. However, the preemptive use of diclofenac in combination with precurarization can alleviate the incidence and severity of succinylcholine-induced myalgia. Therefore, its use may be considered in routine cases for induction of anesthesia for facilitating laryngoscopy and endotracheal intubation.

背景与目的:琥珀酰胆碱是目前唯一一种广泛应用于麻醉诱导的去极化神经肌肉阻滞剂,乙酰胆碱酯酶能快速水解,起效快,作用时间短,是快速序列麻醉诱导的首选药物。术后肌肉疼痛(肌痛)和肌肉僵硬是最常见的副作用,最常见于门诊手术术后第一天。由于此类不良反应,不鼓励在常规病例中使用琥珀胆碱诱导麻醉和插管。然而,由于其成本效益和易于获得,它仍然被一些机构常规使用。本研究旨在研究术前双氯芬酸联合阿曲库铵预化对缓解琥珀胆碱诱导的肌痛的疗效。材料与方法:在某三级医院进行双盲随机对照研究。研究样本为60人,分为两组。所有输入MS-Excel表格的数据,对非参数数据进行Wilcoxon符号秩检验,对参数数据进行单因素方差分析。研究样本的正态分布采用夏皮罗-威尔克检验。结果:试验组微缩明显少于对照组(P < 0.00001)。两组肌痛发生率结果如下:24 h时P值为0.00018,48 h时P值为0.0028。D组术前、术后24 h肌酸激酶水平分别为49.47±7.24,B组为53.30±7.98,D组为87.38±15.16,B组为188.41±33.27。结论:琥珀胆碱引起的肌痛具有复杂的病理生理机制。然而,预先使用双氯芬酸联合预凝可以减轻琥珀胆碱引起的肌痛的发生率和严重程度。因此,可以考虑在常规病例中使用它来诱导麻醉,以方便喉镜检查和气管插管。
{"title":"Premedication with Diclofenac and Precurarization with Atracurium on Succinylcholine-Induced Myalgia in Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy: A Double-Blinded Randomized Study.","authors":"Amit Tirkey,&nbsp;Mukesh Kumar,&nbsp;Ekramul Haque,&nbsp;Tushar Kumar,&nbsp;Ladhu Lakra,&nbsp;Usha Suwalka","doi":"10.4103/aer.aer_35_22","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.4103/aer.aer_35_22","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and aims: </strong>Succinylcholine is the only available depolarizing neuromuscular blocker that has been widely used in the induction of anesthesia, and it is the drug of choice for rapid-sequence induction of anesthesia due to its rapid onset of effect and ultrashort duration of action owing to its rapid hydrolysis by acetyl-cholinesterase. Postoperative muscle pain (myalgia) and muscle stiffness are the most common side effects and are observed most frequently on the 1<sup>st</sup> postoperative day in ambulatory surgery. The use of succinylcholine in the induction of anesthesia and intubation in routine cases has been discouraged because of such adverse effects. However, because of its cost-effectiveness and easy availability, it is still used by some institutions routinely. This study aimed to study the efficacy of preoperative diclofenac along with atracurium precurarization in alleviating succinylcholine-induced myalgia.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>It is a double-blind randomized comparative study carried out in a tertiary care hospital. The study sample was 60 and divided into two equal groups. All data entered in MS-Excel Sheet and Wilcoxon signed-rank test were done for nonparametric data and one-way ANOVA for the parametric data. The normal distribution of the study sample was tested by the Shapiro - Wilk test.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The fasciculations in the test group were much less than in the control group with <i>P</i> < 0.00001. The results for the incidence of myalgia in the two groups were as follows: <i>P</i> value at 24 h was 0.00018 and at 48 h was 0.0028, respectively. Creatine kinase levels at preoperative and 24 h postoperative periods were 49.47 ± 7.24 in Group D, 53.30 ± 7.98 in Group B and 87.38 ± 15.16 in Group D, and 188.41 ± 33.27 in Group B, respectively.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Succinylcholine-induced myalgia has a complex pathophysiology. However, the preemptive use of diclofenac in combination with precurarization can alleviate the incidence and severity of succinylcholine-induced myalgia. Therefore, its use may be considered in routine cases for induction of anesthesia for facilitating laryngoscopy and endotracheal intubation.</p>","PeriodicalId":7798,"journal":{"name":"Anesthesia, Essays and Researches","volume":"16 1","pages":"89-93"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9558659/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"33544728","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
期刊
Anesthesia, Essays and Researches
全部 Acc. Chem. Res. ACS Applied Bio Materials ACS Appl. Electron. Mater. ACS Appl. Energy Mater. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces ACS Appl. Nano Mater. ACS Appl. Polym. Mater. ACS BIOMATER-SCI ENG ACS Catal. ACS Cent. Sci. ACS Chem. Biol. ACS Chemical Health & Safety ACS Chem. Neurosci. ACS Comb. Sci. ACS Earth Space Chem. ACS Energy Lett. ACS Infect. Dis. ACS Macro Lett. ACS Mater. Lett. ACS Med. Chem. Lett. ACS Nano ACS Omega ACS Photonics ACS Sens. ACS Sustainable Chem. Eng. ACS Synth. Biol. Anal. Chem. BIOCHEMISTRY-US Bioconjugate Chem. BIOMACROMOLECULES Chem. Res. Toxicol. Chem. Rev. Chem. Mater. CRYST GROWTH DES ENERG FUEL Environ. Sci. Technol. Environ. Sci. Technol. Lett. Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. IND ENG CHEM RES Inorg. Chem. J. Agric. Food. Chem. J. Chem. Eng. Data J. Chem. Educ. J. Chem. Inf. Model. J. Chem. Theory Comput. J. Med. Chem. J. Nat. Prod. J PROTEOME RES J. Am. Chem. Soc. LANGMUIR MACROMOLECULES Mol. Pharmaceutics Nano Lett. Org. Lett. ORG PROCESS RES DEV ORGANOMETALLICS J. Org. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. A J. Phys. Chem. B J. Phys. Chem. C J. Phys. Chem. Lett. Analyst Anal. Methods Biomater. Sci. Catal. Sci. Technol. Chem. Commun. Chem. Soc. Rev. CHEM EDUC RES PRACT CRYSTENGCOMM Dalton Trans. Energy Environ. Sci. ENVIRON SCI-NANO ENVIRON SCI-PROC IMP ENVIRON SCI-WAT RES Faraday Discuss. Food Funct. Green Chem. Inorg. Chem. Front. Integr. Biol. J. Anal. At. Spectrom. J. Mater. Chem. A J. Mater. Chem. B J. Mater. Chem. C Lab Chip Mater. Chem. Front. Mater. Horiz. MEDCHEMCOMM Metallomics Mol. Biosyst. Mol. Syst. Des. Eng. Nanoscale Nanoscale Horiz. Nat. Prod. Rep. New J. Chem. Org. Biomol. Chem. Org. Chem. Front. PHOTOCH PHOTOBIO SCI PCCP Polym. Chem.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1