Manon S Oud, Nicole de Leeuw, Dominique F C M Smeets, Liliana Ramos, Godfried W van der Heijden, Raoul G J Timmermans, Maartje van de Vorst, Tom Hofste, Marlies J E Kempers, Marijn F Stokman, Kathleen W M D'Hauwers, Brigitte H W Faas, Dineke Westra
Background: Current guidelines indicate that patients with extreme oligozoospermia or azoospermia should be tested for chromosomal imbalances, azoospermia factor (AZF) deletions and/or CFTR variants. For other sperm abnormalities, no genetic diagnostics are recommended.
Objectives: To determine whether exome sequencing (ES) with combined copy number variant (CNV) and single nucleotide variant (SNV) analysis is a reliable first-tier method to replace current methods (validation study), and to evaluate the diagnostic yield after 10 months of implementation (evaluation study).
Materials and methods: In the validation study, ES was performed on DNA of patients already diagnosed with AZF deletions (n = 17), (non-)mosaic sex chromosomal aneuploidies or structural chromosomal anomalies (n = 37), CFTR variants (n = 26), or variants in known infertility genes (n = 4), and 90 controls. The data were analyzed using our standard diagnostic pipeline, with a bioinformatic filter for 130 male infertility genes. In the evaluation study, results of 292 clinical exomes were included.
Results: All previously reported variants in the validation cohort, including clinically relevant Y-chromosomal microdeletions, were correctly identified and reliably detected. In the evaluation study, we identified one or more clinically relevant genetic anomalies in 67 of 292 of all cases (22.9%): these included aberrations that could have been detected with current methods in 30 of 67 patients (10.2% of total), (possible) (mono)genetic causes in the male infertility gene panel in 28 of 67 patients (9.6%), and carriership of cystic fibrosis in nine of 67 patients (3.1%).
Conclusion: ES is a reliable first-tier method to detect the most common genetic causes of male infertility and, as additional genetic causes can be detected, in our evaluation cohort the diagnostic yield almost doubled (10.2%-19.8%, excluding CF carriers). A genetic diagnosis provides answers on the cause of infertility and helps the professionals in the counseling for treatment, possible co-morbidities and risk for offspring and/or family members. Karyotyping will still remain necessary for detecting balanced translocations or low-grade chromosomal mosaicism.
{"title":"Innovative all-in-one exome sequencing strategy for diagnostic genetic testing in male infertility: Validation and 10-month experience.","authors":"Manon S Oud, Nicole de Leeuw, Dominique F C M Smeets, Liliana Ramos, Godfried W van der Heijden, Raoul G J Timmermans, Maartje van de Vorst, Tom Hofste, Marlies J E Kempers, Marijn F Stokman, Kathleen W M D'Hauwers, Brigitte H W Faas, Dineke Westra","doi":"10.1111/andr.13742","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1111/andr.13742","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Current guidelines indicate that patients with extreme oligozoospermia or azoospermia should be tested for chromosomal imbalances, azoospermia factor (AZF) deletions and/or CFTR variants. For other sperm abnormalities, no genetic diagnostics are recommended.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To determine whether exome sequencing (ES) with combined copy number variant (CNV) and single nucleotide variant (SNV) analysis is a reliable first-tier method to replace current methods (validation study), and to evaluate the diagnostic yield after 10 months of implementation (evaluation study).</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>In the validation study, ES was performed on DNA of patients already diagnosed with AZF deletions (n = 17), (non-)mosaic sex chromosomal aneuploidies or structural chromosomal anomalies (n = 37), CFTR variants (n = 26), or variants in known infertility genes (n = 4), and 90 controls. The data were analyzed using our standard diagnostic pipeline, with a bioinformatic filter for 130 male infertility genes. In the evaluation study, results of 292 clinical exomes were included.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>All previously reported variants in the validation cohort, including clinically relevant Y-chromosomal microdeletions, were correctly identified and reliably detected. In the evaluation study, we identified one or more clinically relevant genetic anomalies in 67 of 292 of all cases (22.9%): these included aberrations that could have been detected with current methods in 30 of 67 patients (10.2% of total), (possible) (mono)genetic causes in the male infertility gene panel in 28 of 67 patients (9.6%), and carriership of cystic fibrosis in nine of 67 patients (3.1%).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>ES is a reliable first-tier method to detect the most common genetic causes of male infertility and, as additional genetic causes can be detected, in our evaluation cohort the diagnostic yield almost doubled (10.2%-19.8%, excluding CF carriers). A genetic diagnosis provides answers on the cause of infertility and helps the professionals in the counseling for treatment, possible co-morbidities and risk for offspring and/or family members. Karyotyping will still remain necessary for detecting balanced translocations or low-grade chromosomal mosaicism.</p>","PeriodicalId":7898,"journal":{"name":"Andrology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.2,"publicationDate":"2024-08-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142046154","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Silvia Caroselli, Maurizio Poli, Valentina Gatta, Liborio Stuppia, Antonio Capalbo
Background: Genetic testing serves as a valuable element of reproductive care, applicable at various stages of the reproductive journey: (i) before pregnancy, when a couple's genetic reproductive risk can be evaluated; (ii) before embryo implantation, as part of in vitro fertilization (IVF) treatment, to ascertain several inherited or de novo genetic/chromosomal diseases of the embryo before transfer; (iii) during the prenatal period, to assess the genetic costitution of the fetus. Preconception carrier screening (CS) is a genetic test typically performed on couples planning a pregnancy. The primary purpose of CS is to identify couples at-risk of conceiving a child affected by a severe genetic disorder with autosomal recessive or X-linked inheritance. Detection of high reproductive risk through CS allows prospective parents to be informed of their predisposition and improve reproductive decision-making. These include undergoing IVF with preimplantation genetic testing (PGT) or donor gametes, prenatal diagnosis, adoption, remaining childless, taking no actions. Both the presence of the affected gene (PGT-M) and chromosomal status (PGT-A) of the embryo can be comprehensively assessed through modern approaches.
Objectives: We provide a review of CS and PGT applications to equip healthcare providers with up-to-date information regarding their opportunities and complexities.
Results and discussion: The use of CS and PGT is currently considered the most effective intervention for avoiding both an affected pregnancy whilst using autologous gametes in couples with known increased risk, and chromosomal abnormalities. As our understanding in the genetic component in pathological conditions increases, the number of tested disorders will expand, offering a more thorough assessment of one's genetic inheritance. Nevertheless, implementation and development in this field must be accompanied by scientific and ethical considerations to ensure this approach serves the best long-term interests of individuals and society, promoting justice and autonomy and preserving parenthood and the healthcare system.
Conclusion: The combination of CS and PGT aligns with principles of personalized medicine by offering reproductive care tailored to the individual's genetic makeup.
{"title":"Preconception carrier screening and preimplantation genetic testing in the infertility management.","authors":"Silvia Caroselli, Maurizio Poli, Valentina Gatta, Liborio Stuppia, Antonio Capalbo","doi":"10.1111/andr.13744","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1111/andr.13744","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Genetic testing serves as a valuable element of reproductive care, applicable at various stages of the reproductive journey: (i) before pregnancy, when a couple's genetic reproductive risk can be evaluated; (ii) before embryo implantation, as part of in vitro fertilization (IVF) treatment, to ascertain several inherited or de novo genetic/chromosomal diseases of the embryo before transfer; (iii) during the prenatal period, to assess the genetic costitution of the fetus. Preconception carrier screening (CS) is a genetic test typically performed on couples planning a pregnancy. The primary purpose of CS is to identify couples at-risk of conceiving a child affected by a severe genetic disorder with autosomal recessive or X-linked inheritance. Detection of high reproductive risk through CS allows prospective parents to be informed of their predisposition and improve reproductive decision-making. These include undergoing IVF with preimplantation genetic testing (PGT) or donor gametes, prenatal diagnosis, adoption, remaining childless, taking no actions. Both the presence of the affected gene (PGT-M) and chromosomal status (PGT-A) of the embryo can be comprehensively assessed through modern approaches.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>We provide a review of CS and PGT applications to equip healthcare providers with up-to-date information regarding their opportunities and complexities.</p><p><strong>Results and discussion: </strong>The use of CS and PGT is currently considered the most effective intervention for avoiding both an affected pregnancy whilst using autologous gametes in couples with known increased risk, and chromosomal abnormalities. As our understanding in the genetic component in pathological conditions increases, the number of tested disorders will expand, offering a more thorough assessment of one's genetic inheritance. Nevertheless, implementation and development in this field must be accompanied by scientific and ethical considerations to ensure this approach serves the best long-term interests of individuals and society, promoting justice and autonomy and preserving parenthood and the healthcare system.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The combination of CS and PGT aligns with principles of personalized medicine by offering reproductive care tailored to the individual's genetic makeup.</p>","PeriodicalId":7898,"journal":{"name":"Andrology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.2,"publicationDate":"2024-08-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142016160","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Clotilde Sparano, Giulia Rastrelli, Giovanni Corona, Linda Vignozzi, Daniele Vignoli, Mario Maggi
Introduction: Several robust epidemiological studies suggest that men are often engaged in sexual relationships with younger women with a variable, age-dependent age difference. However, the ageing process determines a significant worsening of the andrological status, which favors the onset of erectile dysfunction and hypogonadism.
Objectives: To analyze the effects of differences in age between the partners [delta (Δ) age (M - F)] on patients referring to the Andrology Unit of Careggi University Hospital for male sexual dysfunction.
Materials and methods: A monocentre cohort of 4055 male subjects was evaluated by SIEDY structured interview. The cross-sectional analysis assessed the psychobiological and relational correlates. The rate of forthcoming major cardiovascular events (MACE) was investigated in the longitudinal analysis. All the models have been adjusted for age, education, lifestyle, and chronic disease score.
Results: ∆ age (M-F) shows a stepwise increase, according to the increasing age bands of the male partner. ∆ age (M-F) was associated with a greater number of children, at the cost of more conflictual relationships within the family. The phenotype of these relationships is characterized by the report of a partner with a higher sexual desire and a higher ability to reach climax. Men seeking a younger partner show more often a histrionic personality (p = 0.023) and higher testosterone levels (p = 0.032). However, having a younger partner doesn't improve the ability to obtain a full erection. Kaplan-Maier analysis of a longitudinal subgroup of patients followed longitudinally (N = 1402) for 4.3 ± 2,59 years, showed that patients in the fourth quartile had a higher rate of forthcoming MACE versus those in the first quartile (p = 0.005).
Discussion and conclusion: In subjects with sexual dysfunctions (as in the general population) age-different relationships increase as a function of male ageing. A greater Δ age (M-F) is associated with specific men and relationship features and a higher risk of MACE.
{"title":"Age disparity in couples and the sexual and general health of the male partner.","authors":"Clotilde Sparano, Giulia Rastrelli, Giovanni Corona, Linda Vignozzi, Daniele Vignoli, Mario Maggi","doi":"10.1111/andr.13738","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1111/andr.13738","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Several robust epidemiological studies suggest that men are often engaged in sexual relationships with younger women with a variable, age-dependent age difference. However, the ageing process determines a significant worsening of the andrological status, which favors the onset of erectile dysfunction and hypogonadism.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To analyze the effects of differences in age between the partners [delta (Δ) age (M - F)] on patients referring to the Andrology Unit of Careggi University Hospital for male sexual dysfunction.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>A monocentre cohort of 4055 male subjects was evaluated by SIEDY structured interview. The cross-sectional analysis assessed the psychobiological and relational correlates. The rate of forthcoming major cardiovascular events (MACE) was investigated in the longitudinal analysis. All the models have been adjusted for age, education, lifestyle, and chronic disease score.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>∆ age (M-F) shows a stepwise increase, according to the increasing age bands of the male partner. ∆ age (M-F) was associated with a greater number of children, at the cost of more conflictual relationships within the family. The phenotype of these relationships is characterized by the report of a partner with a higher sexual desire and a higher ability to reach climax. Men seeking a younger partner show more often a histrionic personality (p = 0.023) and higher testosterone levels (p = 0.032). However, having a younger partner doesn't improve the ability to obtain a full erection. Kaplan-Maier analysis of a longitudinal subgroup of patients followed longitudinally (N = 1402) for 4.3 ± 2,59 years, showed that patients in the fourth quartile had a higher rate of forthcoming MACE versus those in the first quartile (p = 0.005).</p><p><strong>Discussion and conclusion: </strong>In subjects with sexual dysfunctions (as in the general population) age-different relationships increase as a function of male ageing. A greater Δ age (M-F) is associated with specific men and relationship features and a higher risk of MACE.</p>","PeriodicalId":7898,"journal":{"name":"Andrology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.2,"publicationDate":"2024-08-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141999230","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}