Journal of quality in clinical practice最新文献

Abstract The objective of our study was to compare the safety and efficacy of discharging asthmatic children from hospital on three versus four hourly nebulized salbutamol. The setting was a tertiary referral paediatric hospital in Sydney, NSW, Australia. The design was a randomized controlled parallel group study. All children admitted to hospital with acute asthma and who were over 18 months of age were eligible to enter the study. Patients were excluded if they had non-English speaking parents, no telephone, or chronic cardiac or neurological disease. Children were treated according to standard asthma management but were randomly allocated to be discharged on three or four hourly nebulized salbutamol. Patients were surveyed using a telephone questionnaire 1 to 2 weeks after discharge. The primary outcome measure was re-presentation to the Emergency Department (ED) within 7 days. Other outcomes included readmission to hospital, re-presentation to the local doctor, parental satisfaction and length of hospital stay. A total of 63 children were enrolled in the study (32 in the three hourly group and 31 in the four hourly group). There were no re-presentations to the ED or hospital readmissions within 1 to 2 weeks in either group. However, re-presentations to the local doctor were common, 71.8% in the three hourly and 74.1% in the four hourly groups, respectively. These were predominantly for routine review. The mean (± SD) hospital length of stay was not significantly different between the three and four hourly groups, 48.94 (± 20.61) and 54.88 (± 32.59) hours, respectively (P = 0.672). Parents felt the timing of discharge was ‘too early’ in five (15.6%) of three hourly and five (16.1%) of four hourly patients. Three (9.7%) of the four hourly but none of the three hourly patients felt they were sent home ‘later than necessary’. Five (15.1%) of the three hourly and three (9.7%) of the four hourly group parents did not feel comfortable looking after their child at home immediately after discharge. None of these differences were statistically significant. Discharge of asthmatic children from hospital on three hourly nebulized salbutamol is as safe and effective as on four hourly. Parents are generally very satisfied with timing of discharge, irrespective of frequency of nebulization. Earlier discharge benefits both the child and their family, and improves hospital bed utilization.

Abstract Evaluation of the ability of clinical staff to measure blood pressure as well as the functional state of hospital sphygmomanometers has consistently demonstrated marked deficiencies. In this study, the working order of all sphygmomanometers (manual and automated) in a teaching hospital was evaluated. Nursing staff were tested on their knowledge and use of such devices and were also asked to estimate the blood pressure from videotape. The accuracy of a commonly used automated device, Dinamap 8100, was also measured. Of 543 manual sphygmomanometers, 14% were in perfect working order although portable devices were more likely to be functional (47% of 36 units). In contrast, all 135 automated portable devices were in perfect working order although service requirements were seldom met. The mean time since last service was 18 months. There appeared to be an inverse correlation between the availability of automated and manual devices and the maintenance of wall-mounted bedside sphygmomanometers. Staff knowledge about manual devices was adequate as was their ability to accurately measure blood pressure using standardised videotape. Forty-two per cent of 31 nurses who completed the test were correct in 9 of 12 blood pressures. A comparison of this result with a comparable group of nurses tested in 1990 did not detect a significant change in competence. Direct evaluation of the commonly used Dinamap 8100 in 47 hospital patients demonstrated a poor correlation with a mercury sphygmomanometer with a D grade (fail) for systolic and a C grade for diastolic pressure. In summary, maintenance of manual sphygmomanometers was very poor, probably due to their lack of use by clinical staff. This was particularly true for units attached to bedside walls. Nursing staff demonstrated significant deficiencies in manual sphygmomanometer use although their skills were similar to those measured several years earlier. Because of the demonstrated inaccuracy of the Dinamap 8100 automated device, the strong trend towards the use of automated devices instead of manual sphygmomanometers within hospitals cannot be supported.

Abstract In the public sector mental health service setting, accountability for quality has often been considered the responsibility of the individual clinician. This presents a particular challenge for introducing an organization-wide quality improvement culture in this setting. The introduction of a systemic view of quality may encounter resistance from individual clinicians reluctant to accept that some clinical autonomy must be subsumed within more standardized patterns of intervention and evaluation. Services must firstly tackle the issue of clinicians’ readiness to embrace such a culture, which requires strong direction from the executive level. The area of recently diagnosed psychosis was selected in one public sector mental health service as a starting point for initiating the quality improvement culture. The eventual outcome for the organization has been a positive commitment to improvement, but the journey was long and hard. This paper describes the beginning of this ultimately rewarding journey.

The objective of this study was to assess the quality of communications between hospitals and general practitioners (GPs). The proportion of medical records in which the patient’s general practitioner (GP) was identified, the accuracy of medications recorded in the discharge summary, the proportion of GPs who received discharge summaries, and the timeliness of receipt of discharge summaries were all evaluated. Discussions were held with all stakeholders, the literature was reviewed and GPs were surveyed to identify potential measures of quality. These were then trialled to assess their utility and practicability. Timeliness, issues that required follow-up and treatment provided in hospital were of greatest importance to general practitioners. The GP’s name was recorded in 88% of audited records. Few inaccuracies were detected in the medications recorded in the discharge summaries, and GPs received 77% of discharge summaries. Methods similar to those used in this study might be broadly applied to improve the quality of discharge communication throughout Australia.

Abstract The objective of this study was to determine the current state of transfusion practice at a large metropolitan hospital in South Australia, with a view to making recommendations to improve safety. Transfusion practice was monitored using a questionnaire and a concurrent audit design. Patients identified as having received a packed red blood cell transfusion in the previous 24 h, were selected by a random number generator. Questions included those about blood pack identification, documentation of the transfusion process, and patient observation. The results of this audit indicated that areas of documentation, primarily patient consent, blood pack administration times and patient monitoring required re-evaluation. Recommendations to improve practice were made based on these results. This is an ongoing service provided by the hospital, which has proven invaluable in identifying deficiencies in transfusion practice in order to improve patient care.

Abstract Patient compliance has long been recognized to be a problem associated with drug treatment. Dosettes constitute a compliance aid; their aim is to maintain patient independence, while facilitating patient compliance. However, those patients most in need of such devices are the least likely to be able to manage them. It was therefore decided to examine incidents in which problems involving dosettes had been identified; 52 such incidents were found. Half the incidents involved filling errors, and most of these involved nurses; some incidents were potentially dangerous systematic errors. A second type of incident involved a problem with use, mainly caused by hurried or confused patients; these sporadic errors were less dangerous than filling errors. The remainder of the incidents involved patients taking medication in addition to the medication in the dosette. Recommendations include objectively assessing that a dosette is appropriate for the individual patient, and education about the need for compliance, meticulous care and checking when filling, and regular checks to confirm correct use.

Abstract Iatrogenic injuries are important because they are frequent and many may be preventable; those caused by therapeutic drugs are among the most frequent. While medication errors are common, most have little potential for harm. However, some errors, such as giving a patient a drug to which they have a known allergy, are more likely to cause injury. Error theory provides insights into the changes required to reduce medication error injury rates. Data from the Adverse Drug Event (ADE) Prevention study suggest that most serious errors occur at the ordering and dispensing stages, while another, smaller, proportion occur at the administration stage. These data suggest that physician computer-order entry, where physicians write orders on-line with decision support, including patient-specific information and alerts about potential problems, has the potential to significantly reduce the number of serious medication errors.

Clinical experience indicates that many wound infections present relatively late after cardiac surgery. Hence, timing may be an important issue in using this outcome as a clinical indicator. A database of 1000 patients who underwent cardiac surgery was accessed to ascertain baseline characteristics, the type of surgery, and the time of presentation of wound infections. The overall incidence of wound infection was 5.9% (59/1000). Only 36% (21/59) of the wound infections presented while the patient was in hospital. Diabetics were more likely to have a late presentation of a wound infection (the median time of presentation of wound infections (more than 17 days), i.e. 10/29 (33.4%) versus 98/971 (10. 1%), Fisher’s exact test P < 0.01). Wound infection can only be regarded as a reliable clinical indicator after cardiac surgery if patients are reviewed with care for 6 weeks after surgery.

Abstract Previous research has shown that there is a high error rate associated with medication use, resulting in significant patient morbidity and mortality, as well as increasing health care costs. Analysis of available Australian data on adverse drug events shows that incident monitoring and retrospective medical record review provide different, but complementary ‘windows’ into the errors that occur. While retrospective medical record review provides information on the frequency of specific adverse drug events, incident monitoring gives an insight into the contributing factors. From this information, priorities can be set and preventative strategies can be developed.