Annals of palliative medicine最新文献

Radiofrequency ablation (RFA) is a minimally invasive treatment modality that utilizes high-frequency alternating current to destroy targeted tissues through thermal ablation. This manuscript provides an overview of the advancements in RFA, focusing on its mechanism of action and technological innovations. RFA technology was first introduced in the early 1900's, and its use has expanded and evolved, especially in its current utility in the treatment of painful conditions. As the technology has evolved, new techniques, applications and modalities have expanded its use and improved its efficacy. RFA works by applying radiofrequency energy through specialized electrodes, leading to resistive heating and coagulation necrosis. Its advantages include precise tissue targeting, minimal invasiveness, reduced complications, and faster recovery compared to traditional surgical interventions. Technological advancements in RFA have led to improved treatment outcomes. Multi-electrode systems allow for larger ablation zones. Image-guided RFA improves treatment planning and minimizes damage to healthy tissues. Cooled-tip and perfusion electrodes address limitations such as heat sink effects, enhancing RFA's efficacy in challenging anatomical regions. These developments have expanded RFA's applications to liver tumors, lung tumors, renal tumors, cardiac arrhythmias, and chronic pain syndromes. In conclusion, RFA has emerged as a safe and effective thermal ablation technique. Understanding its mechanism of action and integrating advanced technologies have significantly enhanced treatment outcomes. Continued research and innovation in RFA hold immense potential for further improving patient care and outcomes.

Background and objective: Chronic pain is a pervasive and often-complex condition that can severely detract from an individual's quality of life. When conservative measures of treatment fail, radiofrequency ablation (RFA) has emerged as a potential alternative. This narrative review subsequently explores recent advancements in the use of RFA on peripheral nerves as a means of attenuating chronic pain and providing relief to patients.

Methods: A comprehensive literature search was conducted on the PubMed database using the keywords "Radiofrequency", "Ablation", "Pain", "Chronic", "Peripheral", and "Nerve". The search focused on articles published between 2018 to 2023 that discussed an application of RFA in a peripheral nerve. In total, 30 articles were selected for inclusion in this review.

Key content and findings: Results indicate the successful use of RFA in an array of chronic pain conditions and anatomical sites. Applications include the treatment of trigeminal neuralgia (TN), occipital neuralgia, cluster headaches, knee pain derived from osteoarthritis (OA), hip pain, abdominal pain associated with pancreatic cancer, and several other chronic pain conditions.

Conclusions: These findings suggest RFA is a viable option for reducing patient's pain scores and improving quality of life. Future research should build off extensive case reports/series with double-blind, randomized controlled studies to further investigate anecdotal successes.

Background: Radiofrequency ablation (RFA) has many treatment capabilities, one of which includes long term management of chronic headache. As a result, it has been increasingly used, especially in cases of refractory headache pain. Headaches can be classified as primary and secondary and can result from a variety of serious conditions. Types of primary headaches include tension, migraine, and cluster headaches whereas secondary headaches include headaches because of infection or vascular disease, and cervicogenic headaches. Both types can result in serious debility and diminished quality of life. The treatment of chronic headache pain commonly consists of lifestyle modifications, oral medications, and injectable medications. The aim of this study was to investigate the primary and secondary outcomes of RFA for chronic headache pain.

Methods: A systematic review was conducted using three different databases including PubMed, MEDLINE, and the Cochrane Database. The key concepts of "radiofrequency ablation" and "headache" were used. The search took place in June 2023, and it included articles from the past twenty years.

Results: Of the 580 articles found, 32 were included in the review. Most studies focused on pain scores, duration of relief, function, and patient satisfaction. In several studies, RFA was used to target various nerves as the pain generator and compared with modalities such as local anesthetic or corticosteroid.

Conclusions: Overall, RFA shows favorable outcomes in the management of chronic headache pain. Therefore, RFA can serve as an alternative treatment option for patients who fail other conservative treatment regimens. Understanding the outcomes of RFA for headache pain can provide patients and clinicians with evidence for the most appropriate treatment strategies.

Background and objective: Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is characterized by persistent and progressive airflow restriction and is the third leading cause of death and disability, globally. People with severe COPD generally experience long-term functional decline punctuated by periods of acute exacerbation. Symptom burden can be severe and debilitating, and typically includes breathlessness, cough, fatigue, pain, anxiety, depression, and overall reduced quality of life. Understanding current palliative care needs and provisions in this group is an essential step to expanding access in future.

Methods: A narrative review of specialist and generalist (primary) palliative care provisions for people with COPD, with an emphasis on breathlessness symptom management. This paper aims to examine the current landscape of palliative care provision and highlight barriers and facilitators to palliative care access for people with severe COPD.

Key content and findings: People living with severe COPD, as well as the people who care for them, are routinely under-serviced in best-practice end-of-life care, despite having symptom burden that is comparable to that of people with advanced cancer. Barriers to palliative care in this group include lack of specialist palliative care resources, uncertainty surrounding prognostication, and poor recognition of need from both patients and clinicians. Routine early palliative care involvement, including integration of specialist palliative care into respiratory services and upskilling of other healthcare providers to adopt palliative care principals within usual care (primary palliative care), have been shown to improve outcomes indicative of high-quality end-of-life care in this group, including symptom control, place of death, and legal preparations. Ongoing integration of specialist palliative care and professional education for generalist and non-palliative care specialist healthcare providers in the recognition and management of unmet palliative care needs is required to increase capacity beyond traditional specialist palliative care models.

Conclusions: Despite high level of symptom burden, many people with COPD miss out on palliative care. Expanding capacity of traditional specialist palliative care by upskilling generalist healthcare providers and integrating specialist palliative care into existing respiratory services is necessary to improve access for people with COPD.

The United States military Veteran population is aging, thus leading to a group of Veterans who have functional disabilities, sensory impairments, and geriatric syndromes such as frailty and dementia. As they age, Veterans are also at risk of being diagnosed with a variety of serious illnesses, such as neurologic conditions and cancers, some of which are a consequence of prior military service or toxic exposures. In addition to frailty and multicomplexity, Veterans have higher rates of mental health disorders than civilians. All of these factors lead to a population of older Veterans who can benefit from palliative care involvement. Major tenets of palliative care focus on enhancing quality of life and provision of goal-concordant care, which are also aims of the services provided by the Veterans Health Administration (VHA) to all enrolled Veterans. Palliative care involvement in the holistic care of Veterans can deliver expert pain and symptom management, promote Veteran-centric plans of care, and provide crucial support of complex medical decision making often required for those Veterans with serious illness. In this review article, we discuss the unique palliative care needs of Veterans as they age, while also sharing information about relevant resources and services provided by the VHA.

Background and objective: Palliative care can offer individuals improved quality of care and life. While many individuals would benefit from palliative care, only a minority will receive it. Integrating palliative care with geriatrics can help relieve this deficit, help with basic symptom management, advanced care planning (ACP) and develop goals of care to assure that the care provided is congruent with the individual's priorities. The purpose of this narrative review is to demonstrate the importance that the geriatrician can have when participating in the administration of palliative care; to present geriatric-specific issues that are imperative to manage when palliatively treating the older adult with cancer.

Methods: Data were identified by searching PubMed (January 2000 to July 2023) using the following search terms: palliative care, older adults, and cancer care. The search was repeated using geriatrics, pain, fatigue, anxiety, and depression. Non-English articles and observational studies were excluded. Additional review of literature was undertaken using relevant references of identified articles.

Key content and findings: Providing the right service at the right time for older adults with undergoing palliative care is imperative. It is important that clinicians, especially geriatricians, have basic skills in providing this level of care to older patients while working in conjunction with palliative care teams. Older adults are a heterogeneous group, thus utilizing comprehensive geriatric assessment helps the palliative care team to successfully treat individuals. Addressing goals of care, symptom management and ACP can help to maintain quality of life and independence of the older adult. The aging process can affect how the individual perceives and manage their symptoms related to their cancer care including pain, fatigue, anxiety/depression, etc.

Conclusions: Embedding primary care geriatrics in the palliative care arena helps to provide more access to this care. This integration helps providers address basic symptom management, advance care planning and work with individuals on goals of care to assure the care being provided is congruent individual's priorities. Older adults respond to symptoms different than their younger counterparts. Management of these symptoms has to be addressed in a manner commiserate with their age.

Because of improved survival of cancer patients, more patients irradiated for brain metastases develop intracerebral recurrences requiring subsequent courses of radiotherapy. Five studies focused on reirradiation with whole-brain radiation therapy (WBRT) after initial WBRT for brain metastases. Following the second WBRT course, improvement of clinical symptoms was found in 31-68% of patients. Rates of neurotoxicity, such as encephalopathy or cognitive decline, were reported in two studies (1.4% and 32%). In another study, severe or unexpected adverse events were not observed. Survival following the second WBRT course was generally poor, with median survival times of 2.9-4.1 months. The survival prognosis of patients receiving two courses of WBRT can be estimated by a scoring tool considering five prognostic factors. Three studies investigated reirradiation with single-fraction stereotactic radiosurgery (SF-SRS) following primary WBRT. One-year local control rates were 74-91%, and median survival times ranged between 7.8 and 14 months. Rates of radiation necrosis (RN) after reirradiation were 0-6%. Seven studies were considered that investigated re-treatment with SF-SRS or fractionated stereotactic radiation therapy (FSRT) following initial SF-SRS or FSRT. One-year local control rates were 60-88%, and the median survival times ranged between 8.3 and 25 months. During follow-up after reirradiation, rates of overall (asymptomatic or symptomatic) RN ranged between 12.5% and 30.4%. Symptomatic RN occurred in 4.3% to 23.9% of cases (patients or lesions). The risk of RN associated with symptoms and/or requiring surgery or corticosteroids appears lower after reirradiation with FSRT when compared to SF-SRS. Other potential risk factors of RN include the volume of overlap of normal tissue receiving 12 Gy at the first course and 18 Gy at the second course of SF-SRS, maximum doses ≥40 Gy of the first or the second SF-SRS courses, V12 Gy >9 cm3 of the second course, initial treatment with SF-SRS, volume of normal brain receiving 5 Gy during reirradiation with FSRT, and systemic treatment. Cumulative EQD2 ≤100-120 Gy2 to brain, <100 Gy2 to brainstem, and <75 Gy2 to chiasm and optic nerves may be considered safe. Since most studies were retrospective in nature, prospective trials are required to better define safety and efficacy of reirradiation for recurrent or progressive brain metastases.

Background: Palliative care (PC) is oriented to improving the quality of life of patients and their families who are facing problems associated with life-threatening illness. It is a continuously changing and evolving field. Although it is a universal right, there are many barriers to addressing the unmet need for PC, affecting both patient and family as well as health care professionals (HCP). Many studies have highlighted the unmet needs of patients and caregivers, but it is also necessary to understand the needs of HCP in order to better develop PC. It is therefore necessary to identify all those barriers and unmet needs in order to develop and guarantee universal quality PC.

Methods: Bibliography search in relevant databases (PubMed, Cochrane Library, Trip Database) of documents published between 2018 and 2022, both included, written in English or Spanish. Key words-MeSH terms: Palliative Care, Palliative Medicine, Health Personnel, Continuing Education, Health Care Providers; and free text: healthcare professionals, continuous learning, training needs, gap, unmet needs, nursing. Articles about children or teenagers were excluded, as those related to the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic.

Results: A grand total of 1,150 documents were located and 20 were found through other sources. Additionally, 3 documents were found and kept despite not being included in the timeline previously discussed due to its relevance. Only 20 were finally included in this review. The identified unmet needs throughout the PC continuum have been categorized in three groups: diagnosis/recognition of the patient entering the PC continuum; end-of-life (EoL); and bereavement. Facilitators in PC have been identified in each category.

Conclusions: Given the challenging nature of PC and the lack of knowledge throughout the continuum, addressing the challenges identified may result in meaningful and long-lasting results for both HCP and the patient-family unit. Training would be the answer to most of the unmet needs detected.

With improving rates of survival among patients with metastatic malignancies, the request for palliative re-irradiation and re-re-irradiation continues to grow despite an absence of standardized guidelines. With only limited data regarding extra-cranial third-course palliative radiation, many radiation oncologists may feel uncomfortable proceeding with third-course irradiation of the same site. The review explores the available modern data regarding re-re-irradiation. A literature review identified four modern peer-reviewed studies investigating palliative, extra-cranial third-course irradiation with external beam radiation. These studies were retrospective, small, and heterogenous. While they reported comparable rates of pain palliation to first course irradiation and low rates of acute toxicity, interpretation is complicated by heterogeneous treatment parameters and insufficient reporting of cumulative dose equivalents and time intervals. With limited data available, it is critical to prioritize patient safety and quality of life in palliative radiotherapy. Patient selection should be meticulous, considering factors such as initial treatment response and predicted life expectancy. Conformal radiation techniques, strict immobilization, and daily image guidance should be employed to minimize toxicity to organs at risk (OARs). Long-term follow-up is essential for identifying and managing late toxicities effectively. Despite the scarcity of data, retrospective series suggest that extra-cranial third course irradiation can provide effective pain palliation comparable to first-course irradiation with tolerable rates of toxicity. However, careful consideration of patient prognosis and adherence to established principles of palliative radiotherapy are essential in decision-making. Further research and long-term follow-up are needed to refine treatment strategies and ensure safe and efficacious care delivery in this complex clinical scenario.