Background: The wide range of R0 resection rates (R0RR) and incomplete resection rates (IRR) observed with conventional cold snare polypectomy (CCSP) emphasizes the necessity for technique enhancement. The COLDWATER study aimed to compare underwater cold snare polypectomy (UCSP) to CCSP for 5-10-mm colorectal polyps, focusing on comprehensive histopathological evaluation, efficacy, and safety.
Methods: This was a randomized, single-blind, controlled trial comparing UCSP to CCSP for non-pedunculated colorectal polyps of size 5-10 mm. The primary outcome was to report differences in the muscularis mucosa resection ratio. The secondary outcomes focused on differences in depth of excision, R0-RR, IRR, en bloc resection rate, adverse events, and recurrence rate.
Results: The COLDWATER study found higher muscularis mucosa resection in UCSP (81.72±62.81% vs. CCSP: 72.33±22.33%, P=0.003) with comparable submucosa presence (UCSP: 16.6%, CCSP: 12.5%, P=0.25). UCSP showed better outcomes regarding IRR (3.5% vs. 8.5%, P=0.05) and en bloc resection (98% vs. 93.5%, P=0.04). In CCSP, expert endoscopists achieved higher R0RR than non-experts, while UCSP showed no significant difference in R0RR across endoscopist's experience levels.
Conclusions: UCSP achieves a more extensive excision of the muscularis mucosa compared to CCSP, even though it does not attain a deeper excision. Additionally, UCSP shows a higher en bloc resection rate, with lower rates of IRR, and emerges as a promising technique for training inexperienced endoscopists in polypectomy, given its experience-independent success in achieving R0 resection.
背景:传统冷套扎息肉切除术(CCSP)的R0切除率(R0RR)和不全切除率(IRR)范围很广,这强调了改进技术的必要性。COLDWATER 研究旨在比较水下冷套扎息肉切除术(UCSP)与 CCSP 对 5-10 毫米结直肠息肉的治疗效果,重点关注组织病理学综合评估、有效性和安全性:这是一项随机、单盲、对照试验,比较了 UCSP 和 CCSP 对 5-10 毫米大小的非梗阻性结直肠息肉的治疗效果。主要结果是报告肌肉粘膜切除率的差异。次要结果侧重于切除深度、R0-RR、IRR、整块切除率、不良事件和复发率的差异:COLDWATER研究发现,UCSP的肌肉粘膜切除率更高(81.72±62.81% vs. CCSP:72.33±22.33%,P=0.003),粘膜下存在率相当(UCSP:16.6%,CCSP:12.5%,P=0.25)。UCSP在IRR(3.5% vs. 8.5%,P=0.05)和全灶切除(98% vs. 93.5%,P=0.04)方面的疗效更好。在CCSP中,专业内镜医师的R0RR高于非专业内镜医师,而UCSP显示不同内镜医师经验水平的R0RR无显著差异:结论:与CCSP相比,UCSP能更大范围地切除粘膜肌肉,但切除深度不够。此外,UCSP显示出更高的全切率,IRR率更低,是培训缺乏经验的内镜医师进行息肉切除术的一种有前途的技术,因为它在实现R0切除方面的成功与经验无关。
{"title":"Results of the COLDWATER randomized controlled trial: enhanced performance of underwater cold snare polypectomy for colorectal polyps 5-10 mm, independent of endoscopist experience.","authors":"Maria Zachou, Martha Nifora, Theodoros Androutsakos, Georgios Katsaras, Konstantinos Varytimiadis, Christina Zoumpouli, Panayiotis Karantanos, Efthimia Lalla, Georgios Mpetsios, Maria Panoutsakou, Roxana Stoica, Dionisia Thermou, Georgios Mavrogenis, Evangelia Ntikoudi, Nikolaos Nikiteas, Stavros Sougioultzis, Evangelos Kalaitzakis, Stilianos Kykalos","doi":"10.20524/aog.2024.0889","DOIUrl":"10.20524/aog.2024.0889","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The wide range of R0 resection rates (R0RR) and incomplete resection rates (IRR) observed with conventional cold snare polypectomy (CCSP) emphasizes the necessity for technique enhancement. The COLDWATER study aimed to compare underwater cold snare polypectomy (UCSP) to CCSP for 5-10-mm colorectal polyps, focusing on comprehensive histopathological evaluation, efficacy, and safety.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This was a randomized, single-blind, controlled trial comparing UCSP to CCSP for non-pedunculated colorectal polyps of size 5-10 mm. The primary outcome was to report differences in the <i>muscularis mucosa</i> resection ratio. The secondary outcomes focused on differences in depth of excision, R0-RR, IRR, <i>en bloc</i> resection rate, adverse events, and recurrence rate.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The COLDWATER study found higher <i>muscularis mucosa</i> resection in UCSP (81.72±62.81% vs. CCSP: 72.33±22.33%, P=0.003) with comparable submucosa presence (UCSP: 16.6%, CCSP: 12.5%, P=0.25). UCSP showed better outcomes regarding IRR (3.5% vs. 8.5%, P=0.05) and <i>en bloc</i> resection (98% vs. 93.5%, P=0.04). In CCSP, expert endoscopists achieved higher R0RR than non-experts, while UCSP showed no significant difference in R0RR across endoscopist's experience levels.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>UCSP achieves a more extensive excision of the <i>muscularis mucosa</i> compared to CCSP, even though it does not attain a deeper excision. Additionally, UCSP shows a higher <i>en bloc</i> resection rate, with lower rates of IRR, and emerges as a promising technique for training inexperienced endoscopists in polypectomy, given its experience-independent success in achieving R0 resection.</p>","PeriodicalId":7978,"journal":{"name":"Annals of Gastroenterology","volume":"37 4","pages":"466-475"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1,"publicationDate":"2024-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11226736/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141554088","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Background: Vascular intestinal disorder (VID) is a condition with a low incidence, but a high mortality risk. The increasing prevalence of substance abuse and metabolic syndrome among young individuals could impact the burden of VID. This study aimed to evaluate the impact of VID on young individuals.
Methods: Our study harnessed data from the Global Burden of Disease study, spanning 2000 to 2019. With this extensive dataset, we conducted a comprehensive analysis of the prevalence, mortality rates, and impact on disability-adjusted life years (DALYs) related to VID among young individuals aged 15 to 49 years.
Results: Globally, there were an estimated 32,628 cases, 3869 deaths, and 201,099 million DALYs attributed to VID in young individuals. Geographically, the regions of America had the highest burden of VID in young individuals. From 2000-2019, there was an increasing prevalence in all areas, with the most pronounced change observed in Southeast Asia (annual percentage change [APC] +2.17%, P<0.001). Over the study period, there was a more rapid increase in prevalence in males (APC +0.82%, P<0.001) than in females (APC +0.59%, P<0.001). Rates of death and DALYs declined in most regions, except for the Eastern Mediterranean region, where there was a slight increase (APC +0.85%, P<0.001 and 0.88%, P<0.001, respectively).
Conclusion: Over the past decade, the burden of VID in young individuals has been increasing, particularly in Southeast Asia and the Eastern Mediterranean region, necessitating immediate and inclusive measures to tackle the rising burden.
背景:血管性肠道疾病(VID)是一种发病率低但死亡率高的疾病。药物滥用和代谢综合征在年轻人中越来越普遍,这可能会影响血管性肠病的负担。本研究旨在评估 VID 对年轻人的影响:我们的研究利用了 2000 年至 2019 年全球疾病负担研究的数据。利用这一广泛的数据集,我们对 15 至 49 岁年轻人中 VID 的患病率、死亡率以及对残疾调整生命年(DALYs)的影响进行了全面分析:在全球范围内,估计有 32628 例病例、3869 例死亡和 201,099 百万残疾调整生命年。从地域上看,美洲地区的年轻人患 VID 的比例最高。从 2000 年到 2019 年,所有地区的发病率都在上升,东南亚的变化最为明显(年百分比变化[APC]+2.17%,PConclusion):在过去十年中,年轻个体的 VID 负担一直在增加,尤其是在东南亚和地中海东部地区,因此有必要立即采取包容性措施来应对不断增加的负担。
{"title":"The growing trend of vascular intestinal disorder in young individuals: a 20-year analysis.","authors":"Pojsakorn Danpanichkul, Yatawee Kanjanakot, Siwanart Kongarin, Phuuwadith Wattanachayakul, Chawin Lopimpisuth, Sakditad Saowapa, Nattanicha Chaisrimaneepan, Priyata Dutta, Yanfang Pang, Kwanjit Duangsonk","doi":"10.20524/aog.2024.0891","DOIUrl":"10.20524/aog.2024.0891","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Vascular intestinal disorder (VID) is a condition with a low incidence, but a high mortality risk. The increasing prevalence of substance abuse and metabolic syndrome among young individuals could impact the burden of VID. This study aimed to evaluate the impact of VID on young individuals.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Our study harnessed data from the Global Burden of Disease study, spanning 2000 to 2019. With this extensive dataset, we conducted a comprehensive analysis of the prevalence, mortality rates, and impact on disability-adjusted life years (DALYs) related to VID among young individuals aged 15 to 49 years.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Globally, there were an estimated 32,628 cases, 3869 deaths, and 201,099 million DALYs attributed to VID in young individuals. Geographically, the regions of America had the highest burden of VID in young individuals. From 2000-2019, there was an increasing prevalence in all areas, with the most pronounced change observed in Southeast Asia (annual percentage change [APC] +2.17%, P<0.001). Over the study period, there was a more rapid increase in prevalence in males (APC +0.82%, P<0.001) than in females (APC +0.59%, P<0.001). Rates of death and DALYs declined in most regions, except for the Eastern Mediterranean region, where there was a slight increase (APC +0.85%, P<0.001 and 0.88%, P<0.001, respectively).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Over the past decade, the burden of VID in young individuals has been increasing, particularly in Southeast Asia and the Eastern Mediterranean region, necessitating immediate and inclusive measures to tackle the rising burden.</p>","PeriodicalId":7978,"journal":{"name":"Annals of Gastroenterology","volume":"37 4","pages":"458-465"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1,"publicationDate":"2024-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11226745/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141554089","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-07-01Epub Date: 2024-06-14DOI: 10.20524/aog.2024.0894
Saqr Alsakarneh, Kamal Hassan, Fouad Jaber, Micheal Mintz, Mir Zulqarnian, Ayah Obeid, Hassan Ghoz, Jana G Hashash, Francis A Farraye
Background: Inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) epidemiology has changed rapidly in recent years. We aimed to provide a systematic report of the burden of IBD at a state level in the United States (US), and to study the age- and sex-specific trends of incidence, prevalence and mortality rates for the past 3 decades.
Methods: Using the Global Burden of Disease (GBD) 2019 Study Database, we examined the incidence, prevalence and mortality rate, and the disability-adjusted life-years from GBD 2019 at national and state level from 1990-2019.
Results: There was an overall decrease in incidence and prevalence rates of IBD in the US from 1990-2019, while a simultaneous increase in the overall mortality rates was identified. However, a distinct trend of increasing incidence and prevalence rates emerged starting in 2000, with incidence rates rising from 21 cases per 100,000 persons in 2000 to 23 cases per 100,000 persons in 2019. From 1990-2019, incidence and prevalence decreased in males at a higher rate than in females. However, mortality rates increased more in females than males. Incidence rates were highest in Midwestern and Eastern states, and were lowest across the northern Great Plains and Western states, with the highest incidence noted in Michigan (31 cases per 100,000 persons). California had the greatest decrease in incidence rates from 1990-2019 (-63.3%).
Conclusion: Our results concerning recent trends and geographic variations in IBD offer policymakers crucial insights for informed decision-making in policy, research, and investment, facilitating more effective strategies and allocation of resources.
{"title":"The national burden of inflammatory bowel disease in the United States from 1990-2019: results from the Global Burden of Disease study database.","authors":"Saqr Alsakarneh, Kamal Hassan, Fouad Jaber, Micheal Mintz, Mir Zulqarnian, Ayah Obeid, Hassan Ghoz, Jana G Hashash, Francis A Farraye","doi":"10.20524/aog.2024.0894","DOIUrl":"10.20524/aog.2024.0894","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) epidemiology has changed rapidly in recent years. We aimed to provide a systematic report of the burden of IBD at a state level in the United States (US), and to study the age- and sex-specific trends of incidence, prevalence and mortality rates for the past 3 decades.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Using the Global Burden of Disease (GBD) 2019 Study Database, we examined the incidence, prevalence and mortality rate, and the disability-adjusted life-years from GBD 2019 at national and state level from 1990-2019.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There was an overall decrease in incidence and prevalence rates of IBD in the US from 1990-2019, while a simultaneous increase in the overall mortality rates was identified. However, a distinct trend of increasing incidence and prevalence rates emerged starting in 2000, with incidence rates rising from 21 cases per 100,000 persons in 2000 to 23 cases per 100,000 persons in 2019. From 1990-2019, incidence and prevalence decreased in males at a higher rate than in females. However, mortality rates increased more in females than males. Incidence rates were highest in Midwestern and Eastern states, and were lowest across the northern Great Plains and Western states, with the highest incidence noted in Michigan (31 cases per 100,000 persons). California had the greatest decrease in incidence rates from 1990-2019 (-63.3%).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Our results concerning recent trends and geographic variations in IBD offer policymakers crucial insights for informed decision-making in policy, research, and investment, facilitating more effective strategies and allocation of resources.</p>","PeriodicalId":7978,"journal":{"name":"Annals of Gastroenterology","volume":"37 4","pages":"427-435"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1,"publicationDate":"2024-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11226748/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141554090","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-07-01Epub Date: 2024-06-20DOI: 10.20524/aog.2024.0897
Apostolis Papaefthymiou, Nasar Aslam, Mohamed Hussein, Durayd Alzoubaidi, Seth A Gross, Alvaro De La Serna, Ioannis Varbobitis, Tricia A Hengehold, Miguel Fraile López, Jacobo Ortiz Fernández-Sordo, Johannes W Rey, Bu Hayee, Edward J Despott, Alberto Murino, Sulleman Moreea, Phil Boger, Jason M Dunn, Inder Mainie, Daniel Mullady, Dayna Early, Melissa Latorre, Krish Ragunath, John T Anderson, Pradeep Bhandari, Martin Goetz, Ralf Kiesslich, Emmanuel Coron, Enrique Rodríguez De Santiago, Tamas A Gonda, Michael O'Donnell, Benjamin Norton, Andrea Telese, Roberto Simons-Linares, Rehan Haidry
Background: Hemostatic powders are used as second-line treatment in acute gastrointestinal (GI) bleeding (AGIB). Increasing evidence supports the use of TC-325 as monotherapy in specific scenarios. This prospective, multicenter study evaluated the performance of TC-325 as monotherapy for AGIB.
Methods: Eighteen centers across Europe and USA contributed to a registry between 2016 and 2022. Adults with AGIB were eligible, unless TC-325 was part of combined hemostasis. The primary endpoint was immediate hemostasis. Secondary outcomes were rebleeding and mortality. Associations with risk factors were investigated (statistical significance at P≤0.05).
Results: One hundred ninety patients were included (age 51-81 years, male: female 2:1), with peptic ulcer (n=48), upper GI malignancy (n=79), post-endoscopic treatment hemorrhage (n=37), and lower GI lesions (n=26). The primary outcome was recorded in 96.3% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 92.6-98.5) with rebleeding in 17.4% (95%CI 11.9-24.1); 9.9% (95%CI 5.8-15.6) died within 7 days, and 21.7% (95%CI 15.6-28.9) within 30 days. Regarding peptic ulcer, immediate hemostasis was achieved in 88% (95%CI 75-95), while 26% (95%CI 13-43) rebled. Higher ASA score was associated with mortality (OR 23.5, 95%CI 1.60-345; P=0.02). Immediate hemostasis was achieved in 100% of cases with malignancy and post-intervention bleeding, with rebleeding in 17% and 3.1%, respectively. Twenty-six patients received TC-325 for lower GI bleeding, and in all but one the primary outcome was achieved.
Conclusions: TC-325 monotherapy is safe and effective, especially in malignancy or post-endoscopic intervention bleeding. In patients with peptic ulcer, it could be helpful when the primary treatment is unfeasible, as bridge to definite therapy.
{"title":"Hemospray® (hemostatic powder TC-325) as monotherapy for acute gastrointestinal bleeding: a multicenter prospective study.","authors":"Apostolis Papaefthymiou, Nasar Aslam, Mohamed Hussein, Durayd Alzoubaidi, Seth A Gross, Alvaro De La Serna, Ioannis Varbobitis, Tricia A Hengehold, Miguel Fraile López, Jacobo Ortiz Fernández-Sordo, Johannes W Rey, Bu Hayee, Edward J Despott, Alberto Murino, Sulleman Moreea, Phil Boger, Jason M Dunn, Inder Mainie, Daniel Mullady, Dayna Early, Melissa Latorre, Krish Ragunath, John T Anderson, Pradeep Bhandari, Martin Goetz, Ralf Kiesslich, Emmanuel Coron, Enrique Rodríguez De Santiago, Tamas A Gonda, Michael O'Donnell, Benjamin Norton, Andrea Telese, Roberto Simons-Linares, Rehan Haidry","doi":"10.20524/aog.2024.0897","DOIUrl":"10.20524/aog.2024.0897","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Hemostatic powders are used as second-line treatment in acute gastrointestinal (GI) bleeding (AGIB). Increasing evidence supports the use of TC-325 as monotherapy in specific scenarios. This prospective, multicenter study evaluated the performance of TC-325 as monotherapy for AGIB.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Eighteen centers across Europe and USA contributed to a registry between 2016 and 2022. Adults with AGIB were eligible, unless TC-325 was part of combined hemostasis. The primary endpoint was immediate hemostasis. Secondary outcomes were rebleeding and mortality. Associations with risk factors were investigated (statistical significance at P≤0.05).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>One hundred ninety patients were included (age 51-81 years, male: female 2:1), with peptic ulcer (n=48), upper GI malignancy (n=79), post-endoscopic treatment hemorrhage (n=37), and lower GI lesions (n=26). The primary outcome was recorded in 96.3% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 92.6-98.5) with rebleeding in 17.4% (95%CI 11.9-24.1); 9.9% (95%CI 5.8-15.6) died within 7 days, and 21.7% (95%CI 15.6-28.9) within 30 days. Regarding peptic ulcer, immediate hemostasis was achieved in 88% (95%CI 75-95), while 26% (95%CI 13-43) rebled. Higher ASA score was associated with mortality (OR 23.5, 95%CI 1.60-345; P=0.02). Immediate hemostasis was achieved in 100% of cases with malignancy and post-intervention bleeding, with rebleeding in 17% and 3.1%, respectively. Twenty-six patients received TC-325 for lower GI bleeding, and in all but one the primary outcome was achieved.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>TC-325 monotherapy is safe and effective, especially in malignancy or post-endoscopic intervention bleeding. In patients with peptic ulcer, it could be helpful when the primary treatment is unfeasible, as bridge to definite therapy.</p>","PeriodicalId":7978,"journal":{"name":"Annals of Gastroenterology","volume":"37 4","pages":"418-426"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1,"publicationDate":"2024-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11226744/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141554085","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-07-01Epub Date: 2024-06-14DOI: 10.20524/aog.2024.0890
Faisal Kamal, Muhammad Ali Khan, Wade Lee-Smith, Sachit Sharma, Ashu Acharya, Umer Farooq, Zahid Ejaz, Muhammad Aziz, Manesh Kumar Gangwani, Umar Hayat, Anand Kumar, Alexander Schlachterman, David Loren, Thomas Kowalski
Background: Achalasia can cause disabling symptoms that may substantially impair the quality of life. Peroral endoscopic myotomy (POEM) has shown promising results in the management of achalasia. In this meta-analysis we have evaluated the feasibility and safety of single-session POEM with fundoplication (POEM+F) in patients with achalasia.
Methods: We reviewed several databases from inception to July 08, 2022, to identify studies evaluating the feasibility and/or safety of single-session POEM+F for patients with achalasia. Our outcomes of interest included the technical success of POEM+F, adverse events, esophagitis and wrap integrity on follow-up upper endoscopy, total procedure time, and fundoplication time. Pooled rates with 95% confidence intervals (CI) for outcomes were calculated using a random effect model. Heterogeneity was assessed using the I2 statistic.
Results: We included 4 studies with 90 patients. Pooled rates (95%CI) of technical success and adverse events were 92% (83-96%) and 5% (2-11%), respectively. Pooled rates (95%CI) of esophagitis and wrap integrity on follow-up upper endoscopy were 18% (11-30%) and 85% (43-98%) respectively. Pooled mean procedure time and fundoplication time were 113.2 (98.7-127.6) and 55.3 (43.7-66.8) min, respectively.
Conclusions: This meta-analysis demonstrates the feasibility and safety of POEM+F in patients with achalasia. More studies with long-term follow up are required to further validate these findings.
{"title":"Feasibility and safety of peroral endoscopic myotomy with fundoplication in patients with achalasia: a systematic review and meta-analysis.","authors":"Faisal Kamal, Muhammad Ali Khan, Wade Lee-Smith, Sachit Sharma, Ashu Acharya, Umer Farooq, Zahid Ejaz, Muhammad Aziz, Manesh Kumar Gangwani, Umar Hayat, Anand Kumar, Alexander Schlachterman, David Loren, Thomas Kowalski","doi":"10.20524/aog.2024.0890","DOIUrl":"10.20524/aog.2024.0890","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Achalasia can cause disabling symptoms that may substantially impair the quality of life. Peroral endoscopic myotomy (POEM) has shown promising results in the management of achalasia. In this meta-analysis we have evaluated the feasibility and safety of single-session POEM with fundoplication (POEM+F) in patients with achalasia.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We reviewed several databases from inception to July 08, 2022, to identify studies evaluating the feasibility and/or safety of single-session POEM+F for patients with achalasia. Our outcomes of interest included the technical success of POEM+F, adverse events, esophagitis and wrap integrity on follow-up upper endoscopy, total procedure time, and fundoplication time. Pooled rates with 95% confidence intervals (CI) for outcomes were calculated using a random effect model. Heterogeneity was assessed using the <i>I</i> <sup>2</sup> statistic.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We included 4 studies with 90 patients. Pooled rates (95%CI) of technical success and adverse events were 92% (83-96%) and 5% (2-11%), respectively. Pooled rates (95%CI) of esophagitis and wrap integrity on follow-up upper endoscopy were 18% (11-30%) and 85% (43-98%) respectively. Pooled mean procedure time and fundoplication time were 113.2 (98.7-127.6) and 55.3 (43.7-66.8) min, respectively.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This meta-analysis demonstrates the feasibility and safety of POEM+F in patients with achalasia. More studies with long-term follow up are required to further validate these findings.</p>","PeriodicalId":7978,"journal":{"name":"Annals of Gastroenterology","volume":"37 4","pages":"403-409"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1,"publicationDate":"2024-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11226739/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141554083","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-07-01Epub Date: 2024-06-14DOI: 10.20524/aog.2024.0895
Sergio Sobrino-Cossío, Fabian Emura, Oscar Teramoto-Matsubara, Raúl Araya, Adolfo Parra-Blanco, Jonathan Richard White, Vitor Arantes, Josué Aliaga Ramos, Elymir Soraya Galvis-García, Francisco de-la-Vega-González, Gonzalo Rodríguez-Vanegas, Carlos Alberto Donneys, Arturo Reding-Bernal, Estrella Martínez-López, Juan Carlos López-Alvarenga, Noriya Uedo
Background: The use of antifoaming and mucolytic agents prior to upper gastrointestinal (GI) endoscopy and a thorough systematic review are essential to optimize lesion detection. This study evaluated the effect of simethicone and N-acetylcysteine on the adequate mucosal visibility (AMV) of the upper GI tract by an innovative systematic method.
Methods: This randomized, double-blind controlled trial included consecutive patients who underwent diagnostic upper GI endoscopy for screening for early neoplasms between August 2019 and December 2019. The upper GI tract was systematically assessed by systematic alphanumeric-coded endoscopy. Patients were divided into 4 groups: 1) water; 2) only simethicone; 3) N-acetylcysteine + simethicone; and 4) only N-acetylcysteine. The following parameters were assessed in each group: age, sex, body mass index, level of adequate mucosal visibility, and side-effects.
Results: A total of 4564 images from upper GI areas were obtained for evaluation. The mean AMV in the 4 groups was 93.98±7.36%. The N-acetylcysteine + simethicone group had a higher cleaning percentage compared with the other groups (P=0.001). There was no significant difference among the remaining groups, but several areas had better cleaning when a mucolytic or antifoam alone was used. No side-effects were found in any group.
Conclusion: The combination of N-acetylcysteine plus simethicone optimizes the visibility of the mucosa of the upper GI tract, which could potentially increase diagnostic yield.
{"title":"Use of N-acetylcysteine plus simethicone to improve mucosal visibility in upper digestive endoscopy via systematic alphanumeric-coded endoscopy: a randomized, double-blind controlled trial.","authors":"Sergio Sobrino-Cossío, Fabian Emura, Oscar Teramoto-Matsubara, Raúl Araya, Adolfo Parra-Blanco, Jonathan Richard White, Vitor Arantes, Josué Aliaga Ramos, Elymir Soraya Galvis-García, Francisco de-la-Vega-González, Gonzalo Rodríguez-Vanegas, Carlos Alberto Donneys, Arturo Reding-Bernal, Estrella Martínez-López, Juan Carlos López-Alvarenga, Noriya Uedo","doi":"10.20524/aog.2024.0895","DOIUrl":"10.20524/aog.2024.0895","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The use of antifoaming and mucolytic agents prior to upper gastrointestinal (GI) endoscopy and a thorough systematic review are essential to optimize lesion detection. This study evaluated the effect of simethicone and N-acetylcysteine on the adequate mucosal visibility (AMV) of the upper GI tract by an innovative systematic method.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This randomized, double-blind controlled trial included consecutive patients who underwent diagnostic upper GI endoscopy for screening for early neoplasms between August 2019 and December 2019. The upper GI tract was systematically assessed by systematic alphanumeric-coded endoscopy. Patients were divided into 4 groups: 1) water; 2) only simethicone; 3) N-acetylcysteine + simethicone; and 4) only N-acetylcysteine. The following parameters were assessed in each group: age, sex, body mass index, level of adequate mucosal visibility, and side-effects.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 4564 images from upper GI areas were obtained for evaluation. The mean AMV in the 4 groups was 93.98±7.36%. The N-acetylcysteine + simethicone group had a higher cleaning percentage compared with the other groups (P=0.001). There was no significant difference among the remaining groups, but several areas had better cleaning when a mucolytic or antifoam alone was used. No side-effects were found in any group.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The combination of N-acetylcysteine plus simethicone optimizes the visibility of the mucosa of the upper GI tract, which could potentially increase diagnostic yield.</p>","PeriodicalId":7978,"journal":{"name":"Annals of Gastroenterology","volume":"37 4","pages":"410-417"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1,"publicationDate":"2024-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11226743/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141554092","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-07-01Epub Date: 2024-06-20DOI: 10.20524/aog.2024.0898
Abdelkader Chaar, Jin Woo Yoo, Ahmad Nawaz, Rabia Rizwan, Osama Qasim Agha, Paul Feuerstadt
Background: Frailty has major health implications for affected patients and is widely used in the perioperative risk assessment. The Hospital Frailty Risk Score (HFRS) is a validated score that utilizes administrative billing data to identify patients at higher risk because of frailty. We investigated the utility of the HFRS in patients with Clostridioides difficile infection (CDI) to determine whether they were at risk for worse outcomes and higher healthcare resource utilization.
Methods: Using the 2017 National Inpatient Sample, we identified all adults with a primary diagnosis of CDI. We classified patients into 2 groups: those who had an HFRS <5 (NonFrailCDI) and those with a score ≥5 (FrailCDI). We assessed differences in hospital outcomes and healthcare resource utilization based on frailty status.
Results: We identified 93,810 hospitalizations, of which 54,300 (57.88%) were FrailCDI. FrailCDI patients were at higher risk for fulminant CDI (odds ratio [OR] 1.9, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.6-2.3), requiring colectomy (OR 4.1, 95%CI 1.5-11.2), and inpatient mortality (OR 4.5, 95%CI 2.8-7.1). Furthermore, FrailCDI patients had higher odds of requiring Intensive Care Unit admission (OR 13.7, 95%CI 6.3-29.9) or transfer to another facility on discharge (OR 2.2, 95%CI 2.0-2.4), and had longer hospital stays and higher total charges when compared with NonFrailCDI.
Conclusions: Frailty as defined by the HFRS is an independent factor for worse outcomes and higher healthcare utilization in adults admitted for CDI. Risk stratifying patients by frailty may improve outcomes.
{"title":"Frailty is a predictor for worse outcomes in patients hospitalized with <i>Clostridioides difficile</i> infection.","authors":"Abdelkader Chaar, Jin Woo Yoo, Ahmad Nawaz, Rabia Rizwan, Osama Qasim Agha, Paul Feuerstadt","doi":"10.20524/aog.2024.0898","DOIUrl":"10.20524/aog.2024.0898","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Frailty has major health implications for affected patients and is widely used in the perioperative risk assessment. The Hospital Frailty Risk Score (HFRS) is a validated score that utilizes administrative billing data to identify patients at higher risk because of frailty. We investigated the utility of the HFRS in patients with <i>Clostridioides difficile</i> infection (CDI) to determine whether they were at risk for worse outcomes and higher healthcare resource utilization.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Using the 2017 National Inpatient Sample, we identified all adults with a primary diagnosis of CDI. We classified patients into 2 groups: those who had an HFRS <5 (NonFrailCDI) and those with a score ≥5 (FrailCDI). We assessed differences in hospital outcomes and healthcare resource utilization based on frailty status.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We identified 93,810 hospitalizations, of which 54,300 (57.88%) were FrailCDI. FrailCDI patients were at higher risk for fulminant CDI (odds ratio [OR] 1.9, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.6-2.3), requiring colectomy (OR 4.1, 95%CI 1.5-11.2), and inpatient mortality (OR 4.5, 95%CI 2.8-7.1). Furthermore, FrailCDI patients had higher odds of requiring Intensive Care Unit admission (OR 13.7, 95%CI 6.3-29.9) or transfer to another facility on discharge (OR 2.2, 95%CI 2.0-2.4), and had longer hospital stays and higher total charges when compared with NonFrailCDI.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Frailty as defined by the HFRS is an independent factor for worse outcomes and higher healthcare utilization in adults admitted for CDI. Risk stratifying patients by frailty may improve outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":7978,"journal":{"name":"Annals of Gastroenterology","volume":"37 4","pages":"442-448"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1,"publicationDate":"2024-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11226747/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141554084","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-05-01Epub Date: 2024-03-20DOI: 10.20524/aog.2024.0872
Mario El Hayek, Fadi F Francis, Fadi H Mourad, Martine Elbejjani, Kassem Barada, Jana G Hashash
Background: The incidence of colonic adenomas and colorectal cancer has been on the rise among young patients. In this study, we aimed to describe the characteristics of young patients (<50 years) with adenomatous polyps and to characterize those polyps. We also aimed to determine appropriate surveillance intervals for young patients.
Methods: We performed a retrospective chart review of patients <50 years of age who had polypectomy of 1 or more adenomatous polyps on colonoscopy between 2008 and 2021. Patient demographics, colonoscopy indication and polyp characteristics were obtained from the chart. Timing and findings on surveillance colonoscopies were recorded.
Results: A total of 610 patients were included: mean age 42.9±5.9 years, 61% males, body mass index 27.5±4.7 kg/m2, and over 50% smokers. The most common indications were abdominal pain (23.3%), rectal bleeding (22.3%), and change in bowel habits (17.6%). Almost half of the patients who had adenomas (299) were younger than 45 years. Tubular adenoma was the most frequently encountered type of polyp (571; 93.6%). Mean polyp size was 1.1±0.9 cm. The most common location of adenomas was the sigmoid colon (41%). Of patients with adenomas, 156 (26%) had surveillance colonoscopy within 2.9±2.3 years; 74 patients (47.4%) were found to have new adenomas.
Conclusions: Patients aged <50 years with colonic adenomas were mostly males, overweight, and smokers. Further adenomas were found in 47% of surveillance colonoscopies, and most were encountered within 5 years. High rates of recurrent adenomas in people <50 years of age may warrant frequent surveillance.
{"title":"Clinical characteristics of symptomatic young patients with colonic adenomas.","authors":"Mario El Hayek, Fadi F Francis, Fadi H Mourad, Martine Elbejjani, Kassem Barada, Jana G Hashash","doi":"10.20524/aog.2024.0872","DOIUrl":"10.20524/aog.2024.0872","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The incidence of colonic adenomas and colorectal cancer has been on the rise among young patients. In this study, we aimed to describe the characteristics of young patients (<50 years) with adenomatous polyps and to characterize those polyps. We also aimed to determine appropriate surveillance intervals for young patients.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We performed a retrospective chart review of patients <50 years of age who had polypectomy of 1 or more adenomatous polyps on colonoscopy between 2008 and 2021. Patient demographics, colonoscopy indication and polyp characteristics were obtained from the chart. Timing and findings on surveillance colonoscopies were recorded.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 610 patients were included: mean age 42.9±5.9 years, 61% males, body mass index 27.5±4.7 kg/m<sup>2</sup>, and over 50% smokers. The most common indications were abdominal pain (23.3%), rectal bleeding (22.3%), and change in bowel habits (17.6%). Almost half of the patients who had adenomas (299) were younger than 45 years. Tubular adenoma was the most frequently encountered type of polyp (571; 93.6%). Mean polyp size was 1.1±0.9 cm. The most common location of adenomas was the sigmoid colon (41%). Of patients with adenomas, 156 (26%) had surveillance colonoscopy within 2.9±2.3 years; 74 patients (47.4%) were found to have new adenomas.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Patients aged <50 years with colonic adenomas were mostly males, overweight, and smokers. Further adenomas were found in 47% of surveillance colonoscopies, and most were encountered within 5 years. High rates of recurrent adenomas in people <50 years of age may warrant frequent surveillance.</p>","PeriodicalId":7978,"journal":{"name":"Annals of Gastroenterology","volume":"37 3","pages":"341-347"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2,"publicationDate":"2024-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11107410/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141080529","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-05-01Epub Date: 2024-04-10DOI: 10.20524/aog.2024.0878
Jiahao Peng, Samanthika Devalaraju, Mohamed Azab, William T Cates, Molly Stone, Jonathan Reichstein, Sneha Shaha, Subhasis Chatterjee, Andrew B Civitello, Mourad H Senussi, B Joseph Elmunzer, Michael Volk, Wasseem Skef
Background: Gastrointestinal bleeding (GIB) is a common complication after placement of a left ventricular assist device (LVAD). Some institutions attempt to mitigate post-LVAD GIB using preoperative endoscopy. Our study evaluated whether preoperative endoscopy was associated with a lower risk of post-LVAD GIB.
Methods: This was a multicenter cohort study of patients who underwent LVAD insertion from 2010-2019 at 3 academic sites. A total of 398 study participants were categorized based on whether they underwent preoperative endoscopy or not. The follow-up period was 1 year and the primary outcome was GIB. Secondary outcomes were severe bleeding and intraprocedural complications.
Results: A total of 114 patients experienced GIB within 1 year, with a higher rate in the endoscopy cohort (36.4% vs. 24.8%, P=0.015). After adjusting for covariables, the endoscopy cohort remained at increased risk of GIB (adjusted odds ratio 1.77, 95% confidence interval 1.05-2.976; P=0.032). Severe bleeding was common (47.4%). Arteriovenous malformations (48 cases) and peptic ulcer disease (17 cases) were the most identified sources of GIB. Only 1 minor adverse event occurred during preoperative endoscopy.
Conclusions: Our study suggests that pre-LVAD endoscopy is associated with a higher risk of GIB post LVAD, despite controlling for confounders. While this was an observational study and may not have captured all confounders, it appears that endoscopic screening may not be warranted.
{"title":"Pre-left ventricular assist device endoscopic evaluation does not reduce the risk of later gastrointestinal bleeding: a multicenter study.","authors":"Jiahao Peng, Samanthika Devalaraju, Mohamed Azab, William T Cates, Molly Stone, Jonathan Reichstein, Sneha Shaha, Subhasis Chatterjee, Andrew B Civitello, Mourad H Senussi, B Joseph Elmunzer, Michael Volk, Wasseem Skef","doi":"10.20524/aog.2024.0878","DOIUrl":"10.20524/aog.2024.0878","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Gastrointestinal bleeding (GIB) is a common complication after placement of a left ventricular assist device (LVAD). Some institutions attempt to mitigate post-LVAD GIB using preoperative endoscopy. Our study evaluated whether preoperative endoscopy was associated with a lower risk of post-LVAD GIB.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This was a multicenter cohort study of patients who underwent LVAD insertion from 2010-2019 at 3 academic sites. A total of 398 study participants were categorized based on whether they underwent preoperative endoscopy or not. The follow-up period was 1 year and the primary outcome was GIB. Secondary outcomes were severe bleeding and intraprocedural complications.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 114 patients experienced GIB within 1 year, with a higher rate in the endoscopy cohort (36.4% vs. 24.8%, P=0.015). After adjusting for covariables, the endoscopy cohort remained at increased risk of GIB (adjusted odds ratio 1.77, 95% confidence interval 1.05-2.976; P=0.032). Severe bleeding was common (47.4%). Arteriovenous malformations (48 cases) and peptic ulcer disease (17 cases) were the most identified sources of GIB. Only 1 minor adverse event occurred during preoperative endoscopy.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Our study suggests that pre-LVAD endoscopy is associated with a higher risk of GIB post LVAD, despite controlling for confounders. While this was an observational study and may not have captured all confounders, it appears that endoscopic screening may not be warranted.</p>","PeriodicalId":7978,"journal":{"name":"Annals of Gastroenterology","volume":"37 3","pages":"313-320"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2,"publicationDate":"2024-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11107400/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141080556","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-05-01Epub Date: 2024-03-14DOI: 10.20524/aog.2024.0870
Bálint Gellért, Árpád V Patai, István Hritz
Of all the possible complications associated with endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP), acute pancreatitis undoubtedly represents the heaviest burden for patients and healthcare professionals. The overall incidence, ranging from 3.5% to around 10%, and annual estimated costs exceeding $150 million in the USA should signal caution for everyone carrying out ERCP. In-depth knowledge of the risk factors and the pharmacological and endoscopic treatment options is required to avoid this adverse event. In this review, we evaluate the relevant data published in the literature since the appearance of the latest recommendations of the leading gastroenterological societies. Thus, we intend to provide a comprehensive and up-to-date overview of the factors to consider and possible interventions applicable before and after the intervention to prevent the development of post-ERCP pancreatitis.
{"title":"Update in preventing post-endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography pancreatitis.","authors":"Bálint Gellért, Árpád V Patai, István Hritz","doi":"10.20524/aog.2024.0870","DOIUrl":"10.20524/aog.2024.0870","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Of all the possible complications associated with endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP), acute pancreatitis undoubtedly represents the heaviest burden for patients and healthcare professionals. The overall incidence, ranging from 3.5% to around 10%, and annual estimated costs exceeding $150 million in the USA should signal caution for everyone carrying out ERCP. In-depth knowledge of the risk factors and the pharmacological and endoscopic treatment options is required to avoid this adverse event. In this review, we evaluate the relevant data published in the literature since the appearance of the latest recommendations of the leading gastroenterological societies. Thus, we intend to provide a comprehensive and up-to-date overview of the factors to consider and possible interventions applicable before and after the intervention to prevent the development of post-ERCP pancreatitis.</p>","PeriodicalId":7978,"journal":{"name":"Annals of Gastroenterology","volume":"37 3","pages":"266-279"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2,"publicationDate":"2024-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11107403/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141080557","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}