ACS Applied Polymer Materials最新文献

Background and objectives: The 21-point Brain Care Score (BCS) is an index that ranks behaviors and clinical measurements with the aim of encouraging lifestyle adjustments to lower the incidence of age-related brain disease, including stroke, late-life depression (LLD), and dementia. A higher BCS at baseline is associated with a lower risk of these outcomes. We aimed to investigate whether the associations between BCS and stroke, LLD, and dementia risks are independent of genetic predisposition for these conditions and quantify the effect of healthy lifestyle across genetic risk distributions for these outcomes.

Methods: Using the UK Biobank (UKB) prospective cohort study, we computed baseline BCSs and polygenic scores to estimate genetic predisposition for stroke and LLD and APOE ε allele status to stratify dementia risk. As for outcomes again in UKB, we measured incidence of stroke, LLD, and dementia. We used multivariate Cox proportional hazard models to assess associations between BCS, genetic predisposition, and these outcomes. We also conducted stratified and interaction analyses to estimate the incidence of these outcomes across quartiles of genetic risk and BCS.

Results: We included 368,340 UKB participants (median age 58 years (interquartile range 51-63 years), 46.3% male). Independent of genetic risk, a 5-point increase in BCS corresponded to lowered hazards of stroke (hazard ratio [HR] 0.70, 95% CI 0.68-0.73), LLD (HR 0.65, 95% CI 0.63-0.67), and dementia (HR 0.82, 95% CI 0.78-0.85). Incidences of all 3 outcomes were higher among participants with high genetic risk of these outcomes. However, these increased risks were offset for individuals with a higher BCS (incidence rates per 1,000 person-years were 2.76 vs 1.19 for stroke, 7.34 vs 4.46 for LLD, and 3.64 vs 2.05 for dementia, when comparing low and high BCS).

Discussion: Across different genetic predispositions for stroke, LLD, and dementia, healthier lifestyle behaviors are protective for brain health, demonstrating the nondeterminism of genetic risk. Furthermore, differences in BCS behave as aggregate risk estimators of all 3 outcomes. Further work is needed to prospectively investigate the utility and performance of the BCS as a targeted intervention in populations at elevated genetic risk of age-related brain disease.

Background and objectives: In recent years, researchers have sought to address the challenges of obtaining informed consent for participation in acute stroke trials. We studied outcomes related to the use of deferral of consent in the phase 3 Alteplase Compared to Tenecteplase (AcT) trial.

Methods: As part of our protocol, we captured methods of consent, participant withdrawals, door-to-randomization times, and door-to-needle times. Participants at 3 sites were invited to complete a survey of attitudes regarding consent for AcT and for acute stroke trials generally.

Results: The AcT trial enrolled 1,600 participants from 22 centers across Canada of whom 1,537 were enrolled through deferral of consent (96.0%) and 63 (4.0%) were enrolled by prospective verbal consent followed by written informed consent. Of those enrolled by deferral of consent, 95% (1,454/1,537) consented to ongoing participation. Door-to-randomization times were similar regardless of method of consent, with an overall median of 30 minutes (interquartile range [IQR] 22-42): 29 minutes (IQR 22-42) in the deferral of consent group vs 32 minutes (IQR 25-44) in the prospective consent group (p = 0.1602). Survey respondents overwhelming agreed or strongly agreed with the use of deferral of consent in AcT (86%) and in any acute stroke trial (76%).

Discussion: Deferral of consent was broadly acceptable to participants in the AcT trial as demonstrated by low rates of withdrawal and by survey results. Door-to-randomization times using deferral of consent in AcT were short, although a system of prospective verbal consent used at 1 center took only slightly longer. These results support the importance of innovation around consent for acute stroke trials.

Background and objectives: Epidemiologic studies suggest increasing incidence and prevalence of myasthenia gravis (MG) among the elderly population outside the United States. We aimed to provide an estimation of MG incidence and prevalence and their trend among the Medicare Fee-For-Service (FFS)-covered elderly US population.

Methods: We performed a retrospective longitudinal study using Medicare claims data (2006-2019). Study-eligible beneficiaries were aged 65 years and older, had at least 1 month of FFS Part A/B coverage, and were without any health maintenance organization insurance coverage. Study-eligible beneficiaries were aggregated into 2-year periods from 2006-2007 through 2018-2019. MG cases were ascertained using a validated algorithm of 2 MG claims within each 2-year period, from 2 outpatient office visits or a combination of 1 inpatient admission and 1 outpatient office visit, separated by ≥ 28 days. Period prevalence was calculated from MG-ascertained cases divided by FFS Part A/B beneficiaries and reported as cases per 100,000 population. Incident cases were determined among MG prevalent cases if the initial MG claim occurred in that period after a full calendar year since coverage initiation. Incidence was calculated as case counts per 100,000 at-risk beneficiary person-years (PYs) in each period excluding 2006-2007. Trends of prevalence and incidence over time were examined with Poisson regression. All-cause mortality of each 2-year period was calculated.

Results: The period prevalence of MG increased from 81 to 119 per 100,000 FFS A/B population from 2006-2007 to 2018-2019 (p < 0.001). Increasing trends of prevalence were observed in all sex (male/female), age (65-69/70-74/75-79/80+), race/ethnic (African American/Asian/Hispanics of any race/non-Hispanic White/other), and census region (Northeast/Midwest/South/West) subgroups. MG incidence increased from 12.2 to 13.3 per 100,000 PYs from 2008-2009 to 2018-2019 (p < 0.05). Increasing incidence trends were significant in the following subgroups: men and women; all age groups except 75-79 years; White non-Hispanic race; Northeast, Midwest, and South census regions. All-cause mortality among MG beneficiaries was stable from 6.26 deaths per 100 PYs in 2006-2007 to 5.67 in 2018-2019 (p = 0.18).

Discussion: Increasing trends in MG prevalence and incidence in the elderly US population, with variation in rates of certain subgroups, are confirmed in this 14-year period.