首页 > 最新文献

Annals of Laparoscopic and Endoscopic Surgery最新文献

英文 中文
Influence of gas type, pressure, and temperature in laparoscopy—a systematic review 腹腔镜手术中气体类型、压力和温度的影响——系统综述
IF 0.5 4区 医学 Q3 Medicine Pub Date : 2021-01-01 DOI: 10.21037/ales-21-24
T. Galetin, A. Galetin
{"title":"Influence of gas type, pressure, and temperature in laparoscopy—a systematic review","authors":"T. Galetin, A. Galetin","doi":"10.21037/ales-21-24","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.21037/ales-21-24","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":8024,"journal":{"name":"Annals of Laparoscopic and Endoscopic Surgery","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.5,"publicationDate":"2021-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"42162840","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2
Minimally invasive gastrectomy after neoadjuvant chemotherapy: a literature review 新辅助化疗后微创胃切除术:文献回顾
IF 0.5 4区 医学 Q3 Medicine Pub Date : 2021-01-01 DOI: 10.21037/ales-21-28
Alberto d’Amore, S. Pascale, F. Ascari, E. Bertani, U. F. Romario
Objective: This review was conducted to assess the results of minimally invasive surgery for advanced gastric cancer after preoperative chemotherapy. Background: Localized gastric cancer is treated mainly via surgery. Among recent advances in surgical treatments, minimally invasive gastrectomies have become standard treatment for early gastric cancer and are becoming a safe option for advanced gastric cancers. However, most studies on laparoscopic gastrectomies for locally advanced gastric cancer have been performed in patients undergoing primary surgery. In Western countries, most patients with locally advanced gastric cancer undergo preoperative chemotherapy. However, concerns remain regarding the indications for minimally invasive gastrectomies in patients with locally advanced gastric cancer, treated with preoperative chemotherapy. Methods: We conducted a systematic search of the electronic medical databases to identify all relevant publications on minimally invasive gastrectomy. Eight papers were analyzed. Conclusions: Neoadjuvant chemotherapy does not adversely influence the results of a minimally invasive gastrectomy, and minimally invasive surgery, even after neoadjuvant chemotherapy, may facilitate postoperative chemotherapy in terms of timing and number of completed chemotherapeutic cycles.
目的:评价晚期胃癌术前化疗后微创手术治疗的效果。背景:局部胃癌主要通过手术治疗。在外科治疗的最新进展中,微创胃切除术已成为早期胃癌的标准治疗方法,并且正在成为晚期胃癌的安全选择。然而,大多数关于腹腔镜胃切除术治疗局部晚期胃癌的研究都是在接受原发性手术的患者中进行的。在西方国家,大多数局部晚期胃癌患者都接受术前化疗。然而,对于局部晚期胃癌患者术前化疗微创胃切除术的适应症,人们仍然存在担忧。方法:我们对电子医学数据库进行了系统的检索,以确定所有关于微创胃切除术的相关出版物。对8篇论文进行了分析。结论:新辅助化疗不会对微创胃切除术的结果产生不良影响,即使在新辅助化疗后进行微创手术,也可能在化疗时间和完成化疗周期次数方面促进术后化疗。
{"title":"Minimally invasive gastrectomy after neoadjuvant chemotherapy: a literature review","authors":"Alberto d’Amore, S. Pascale, F. Ascari, E. Bertani, U. F. Romario","doi":"10.21037/ales-21-28","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.21037/ales-21-28","url":null,"abstract":"Objective: This review was conducted to assess the results of minimally invasive surgery for advanced gastric cancer after preoperative chemotherapy. Background: Localized gastric cancer is treated mainly via surgery. Among recent advances in surgical treatments, minimally invasive gastrectomies have become standard treatment for early gastric cancer and are becoming a safe option for advanced gastric cancers. However, most studies on laparoscopic gastrectomies for locally advanced gastric cancer have been performed in patients undergoing primary surgery. In Western countries, most patients with locally advanced gastric cancer undergo preoperative chemotherapy. However, concerns remain regarding the indications for minimally invasive gastrectomies in patients with locally advanced gastric cancer, treated with preoperative chemotherapy. Methods: We conducted a systematic search of the electronic medical databases to identify all relevant publications on minimally invasive gastrectomy. Eight papers were analyzed. Conclusions: Neoadjuvant chemotherapy does not adversely influence the results of a minimally invasive gastrectomy, and minimally invasive surgery, even after neoadjuvant chemotherapy, may facilitate postoperative chemotherapy in terms of timing and number of completed chemotherapeutic cycles.","PeriodicalId":8024,"journal":{"name":"Annals of Laparoscopic and Endoscopic Surgery","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.5,"publicationDate":"2021-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"47610509","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Best conservative options for fecal incontinence 大便失禁的最佳保守选择
IF 0.5 4区 医学 Q3 Medicine Pub Date : 2021-01-01 DOI: 10.21037/ales-2022-04
Adam D. Price, Ian M. Paquette
{"title":"Best conservative options for fecal incontinence","authors":"Adam D. Price, Ian M. Paquette","doi":"10.21037/ales-2022-04","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.21037/ales-2022-04","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":8024,"journal":{"name":"Annals of Laparoscopic and Endoscopic Surgery","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.5,"publicationDate":"2021-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"43157078","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Distal gastrectomy: the evidence—a narrative overview 远端胃切除术:证据-叙述概述
IF 0.5 4区 医学 Q3 Medicine Pub Date : 2021-01-01 DOI: 10.21037/ALES-21-4
P. Kassab, Osvaldo Castro
The first laparoscopic distal gastrectomy (LDG) was performed by Kitano in 1991. It was a revolution in the surgical treatment of stomach cancer with the following rationale: to provide better quality of life, less pain in the postoperative period, less blood loss, earlier recovery and shorter hospital stay, all with equal surgical quality (1). Over the last 30 years with the development of equipment and improvement in optical systems, there has been a great advance in studies that confirmed technical safety and good oncological results (2). Although the first patients were operated on in the early 1990s, it was only between 2000 and 2010 that the most consistent studies appeared, first reporting on the effectiveness of the technique and later, showing encouraging oncological results. Nowadays, the method is receiving international approval after the publication of randomized clinical trials. Review Article
第一个腹腔镜远端胃切除术(LDG)是由北野在1991年进行的。这是癌症外科治疗的一场革命,其基本原理如下:提供更好的生活质量,术后疼痛减轻,出血减少,恢复更早,住院时间更短,所有这些都具有同等的手术质量(1)。在过去的30年里,随着设备的发展和光学系统的改进,研究取得了巨大进展,证实了技术安全性和良好的肿瘤学结果(2)。尽管第一批患者在20世纪90年代初接受了手术,但直到2000年至2010年,才出现了最一致的研究,首先报告了该技术的有效性,后来又显示出令人鼓舞的肿瘤学结果。如今,该方法在随机临床试验发表后获得了国际认可。审阅文章
{"title":"Distal gastrectomy: the evidence—a narrative overview","authors":"P. Kassab, Osvaldo Castro","doi":"10.21037/ALES-21-4","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.21037/ALES-21-4","url":null,"abstract":"The first laparoscopic distal gastrectomy (LDG) was performed by Kitano in 1991. It was a revolution in the surgical treatment of stomach cancer with the following rationale: to provide better quality of life, less pain in the postoperative period, less blood loss, earlier recovery and shorter hospital stay, all with equal surgical quality (1). Over the last 30 years with the development of equipment and improvement in optical systems, there has been a great advance in studies that confirmed technical safety and good oncological results (2). Although the first patients were operated on in the early 1990s, it was only between 2000 and 2010 that the most consistent studies appeared, first reporting on the effectiveness of the technique and later, showing encouraging oncological results. Nowadays, the method is receiving international approval after the publication of randomized clinical trials. Review Article","PeriodicalId":8024,"journal":{"name":"Annals of Laparoscopic and Endoscopic Surgery","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.5,"publicationDate":"2021-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"45771193","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1
R-Y gastric bypass and its modifications R-Y胃旁路术及其改良
IF 0.5 4区 医学 Q3 Medicine Pub Date : 2021-01-01 DOI: 10.21037/ALES-2019-BMS-11
C. Kayaalp, F. Sumer
© Annals of Laparoscopic and Endoscopic Surgery. All rights reserved. Ann Laparosc Endosc Surg 2020 | http://dx.doi.org/10.21037/ales-2019-bms-11 It is now clear that sleeve gastrectomy (SG) in a vertical manner is the most preferred weight loss surgical procedure in general, but we can objectively declare that Rouxen-Y gastric bypass (RYGB) is yet one of the most opted procedures in the globe. The announced outcomes of the RYGB studies have a longer history than the relatively contemporary developed methods such as mini-gastric bypass, SG or gastric plication, and the cumulative information on RYGB is more and more than the new techniques (1). Although these recently developed surgical methods have become more popular among the weight loss surgery options, RYGB's former peers such as gastric bands and biliopancreatic diversion lost their supporters over time due to their less efficacy or higher morbidities (1). Some less comprehensive surgical procedures increase the risk of ineffective weight loss and/or failure to cure obesity-related comorbidities and on the other hand, some more complex but more effective procedures cause severe postoperative morbidity that can be hardly treated. RYGB now keep its popularity in most obesity surgery centers and we believe that its popularity is originated from the good balance between its effectiveness and morbidity (1). As with all bariatric procedures, weight regain can be seen after RYGB. For this reason, besides proximal RYGB, which is accepted as a classic, some modified applications are used in primary or revisional surgery. The objective of this article is making a review that reminds the modified RYGB techniques. Although there are many studies on RYGB modifications in literature, it is seen that there are four types of RYGB operations, proximal, distal, long pouch and banded.
©腹腔镜和内窥镜外科年鉴。保留所有权利。Ann Laparosc Endosc Surg 2020 |http://dx.doi.org/10.21037/ales-2019-bms-11现在很明显,垂直袖状胃切除术(SG)是最受欢迎的减肥手术,但我们可以客观地宣布,Rouxen-Y胃旁路术(RYGB)仍然是全球最受选择的手术之一。RYGB研究的公布结果比相对现代的发展方法(如小型胃旁路术、SG或胃折叠术)有更长的历史,并且关于RYGB的累积信息比新技术越来越多(1)。尽管这些最近开发的手术方法在减肥手术中越来越受欢迎,但随着时间的推移,RYGB的前同行,如胃束带和胆胰分流,由于其疗效较低或发病率较高,失去了他们的支持者(1)。一些不太全面的手术增加了无效减肥和/或无法治愈肥胖相关合并症的风险,另一方面,一些更复杂但更有效的手术会导致难以治疗的严重术后发病率。RYGB现在在大多数肥胖手术中心都很受欢迎,我们认为它的受欢迎源于其有效性和发病率之间的良好平衡(1)。与所有减肥手术一样,RYGB后可以看到体重回升。出于这个原因,除了被公认为经典的近端RYGB外,一些改良的应用也被用于初次或翻修手术。本文的目的是对改进的RYGB技术进行回顾。尽管文献中有许多关于RYGB修饰的研究,但可以看出RYGB手术有四种类型,近端、远端、长囊和带状。
{"title":"R-Y gastric bypass and its modifications","authors":"C. Kayaalp, F. Sumer","doi":"10.21037/ALES-2019-BMS-11","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.21037/ALES-2019-BMS-11","url":null,"abstract":"© Annals of Laparoscopic and Endoscopic Surgery. All rights reserved. Ann Laparosc Endosc Surg 2020 | http://dx.doi.org/10.21037/ales-2019-bms-11 It is now clear that sleeve gastrectomy (SG) in a vertical manner is the most preferred weight loss surgical procedure in general, but we can objectively declare that Rouxen-Y gastric bypass (RYGB) is yet one of the most opted procedures in the globe. The announced outcomes of the RYGB studies have a longer history than the relatively contemporary developed methods such as mini-gastric bypass, SG or gastric plication, and the cumulative information on RYGB is more and more than the new techniques (1). Although these recently developed surgical methods have become more popular among the weight loss surgery options, RYGB's former peers such as gastric bands and biliopancreatic diversion lost their supporters over time due to their less efficacy or higher morbidities (1). Some less comprehensive surgical procedures increase the risk of ineffective weight loss and/or failure to cure obesity-related comorbidities and on the other hand, some more complex but more effective procedures cause severe postoperative morbidity that can be hardly treated. RYGB now keep its popularity in most obesity surgery centers and we believe that its popularity is originated from the good balance between its effectiveness and morbidity (1). As with all bariatric procedures, weight regain can be seen after RYGB. For this reason, besides proximal RYGB, which is accepted as a classic, some modified applications are used in primary or revisional surgery. The objective of this article is making a review that reminds the modified RYGB techniques. Although there are many studies on RYGB modifications in literature, it is seen that there are four types of RYGB operations, proximal, distal, long pouch and banded.","PeriodicalId":8024,"journal":{"name":"Annals of Laparoscopic and Endoscopic Surgery","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.5,"publicationDate":"2021-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"48237706","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1
Who should be repairing these hernias? Level of expertise? 应该由谁来修复这些疝气?专业水平?
IF 0.5 4区 医学 Q3 Medicine Pub Date : 2020-12-05 DOI: 10.21037/ALES-19-237
E. Furay, S. Doggett, F. P. Buckley
Hiatal hernias are commonly seen in patients presenting with GERD. Surgical management of patients with hiatal hernias remains a challenge given the lack of general consensus on management and operative technique. This has led to gaps in quality and outcomes of care in these patients. Variable levels of knowledge, experience, and expertise among practitioners has resulted in extreme deviations in preoperative evaluation, procedural technique, follow-up, and outcomes, that led to poor confidence in surgical management of GERD and hiatal hernias. We performed a literature review of contemporary and latest studies compiled in review format. The conclusions we made from our review of the literature were that foregut surgeons need to have a comprehensive understanding of foregut physiology and coordinate a thorough preoperative evaluation including independent interpretation of esophageal physiologic testing and the ability to perform endoscopy. Foregut surgeons should have specialized expertise and training in benign foregut procedures, minimally invasive techniques, and have a commitment to long term follow up. Ideally these complex operations would be completed by a minimally invasive trained surgeon at a high-volume center as improved outcomes and decreased costs have been associated with laparoscopic technique and increased surgeon/hospital volume. A multidisciplinary approach should be utilized when feasible.
裂孔疝常见于胃食管反流患者。由于缺乏对治疗和手术技术的普遍共识,裂孔疝患者的手术治疗仍然是一个挑战。这导致对这些患者的护理质量和结果存在差距。从业人员的知识、经验和专业知识水平各不相同,导致术前评估、手术技术、随访和结果存在极大差异,导致对胃食管反流和裂孔疝的手术治疗信心不足。我们以综述的形式对当代和最新的研究进行了文献综述。我们从文献综述中得出的结论是,前肠外科医生需要对前肠生理有全面的了解,并协调全面的术前评估,包括独立解释食管生理检查和进行内窥镜检查的能力。前肠外科医生应该在良性前肠手术、微创技术方面有专门的专业知识和培训,并有长期随访的承诺。理想情况下,这些复杂的手术将由受过微创训练的外科医生在大容量中心完成,因为腹腔镜技术和外科医生/医院数量的增加改善了结果,降低了成本。可行时应采用多学科方法。
{"title":"Who should be repairing these hernias? Level of expertise?","authors":"E. Furay, S. Doggett, F. P. Buckley","doi":"10.21037/ALES-19-237","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.21037/ALES-19-237","url":null,"abstract":"Hiatal hernias are commonly seen in patients presenting with GERD. Surgical management of patients with hiatal hernias remains a challenge given the lack of general consensus on management and operative technique. This has led to gaps in quality and outcomes of care in these patients. Variable levels of knowledge, experience, and expertise among practitioners has resulted in extreme deviations in preoperative evaluation, procedural technique, follow-up, and outcomes, that led to poor confidence in surgical management of GERD and hiatal hernias. We performed a literature review of contemporary and latest studies compiled in review format. The conclusions we made from our review of the literature were that foregut surgeons need to have a comprehensive understanding of foregut physiology and coordinate a thorough preoperative evaluation including independent interpretation of esophageal physiologic testing and the ability to perform endoscopy. Foregut surgeons should have specialized expertise and training in benign foregut procedures, minimally invasive techniques, and have a commitment to long term follow up. Ideally these complex operations would be completed by a minimally invasive trained surgeon at a high-volume center as improved outcomes and decreased costs have been associated with laparoscopic technique and increased surgeon/hospital volume. A multidisciplinary approach should be utilized when feasible.","PeriodicalId":8024,"journal":{"name":"Annals of Laparoscopic and Endoscopic Surgery","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.5,"publicationDate":"2020-12-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"42927324","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1
Sleeve gastrectomy and its modifications 袖式胃切除术及其改良
IF 0.5 4区 医学 Q3 Medicine Pub Date : 2020-12-05 DOI: 10.21037/ALES-20-30
C. E. Guldogan, Ö. Özozan, Mehmet Mahir Özmen
Initially sleeve gastrectomy (SG) was performed as an open procedure in 1988, known as Hess and Marceau’s technique, which is actually the first stage of the bilio-pancreatic diversion-duodenal switch (BPD-DS). It was proposed in 1993 as a single weight-loss procedure defined by Johnston, later known as operation Magenstrasse and Mill. In 1999 Gagner was the first to describe laparoscopic SG technique. Therefore SG became popular and one of the most common bariatric surgery procedure in the world. The method has many technical differences. Unfortunately, there is still no strict standardization of the method. With the development of technology, robotic surgery has taken its place in bariatric surgery field. A lot of new studies on robotic SG (RSG) have recently been published. Also there are several technical conflict, such as distance from the pylorus, resection of greater curvature, size of the antrum, use of bougie, fundus resection, whether or not reinforce the staple line, identification and repair of the hiatus. There are also some contraindications for SG. Barrett’s esophagus is a one of them. These variations in the technique affect the complications and effectiveness of surgery. In this study, we aimed to discuss the development and modifications of SG steps of with the current literature review.
最初的袖状胃切除术(SG)是在1988年进行的开放手术,被称为Hess和Marceau技术,这实际上是胆胰转移十二指肠转换(BPD-DS)的第一阶段。1993年,约翰斯顿提出了一种单一的减肥方法,后来被称为Magenstrasse和Mill手术。1999年,Gagner首次描述了腹腔镜SG技术。因此,SG成为世界上最流行的减肥手术之一。这种方法在技术上有很多不同。不幸的是,这种方法仍然没有严格的标准化。随着技术的发展,机器人手术已经在减肥手术领域占据了一席之地。近年来,有许多关于机器人SG (RSG)的新研究发表。还有几个技术上的冲突,如离幽门的距离,切除更大的曲率,上颌窦的大小,使用凸体,切除眼底,是否加固钉线,裂孔的识别和修复。SG也有一些禁忌。巴雷特的食道就是其中之一。这些技术上的变化会影响手术的并发症和效果。在本研究中,我们旨在通过目前的文献综述来讨论SG步骤的发展和修改。
{"title":"Sleeve gastrectomy and its modifications","authors":"C. E. Guldogan, Ö. Özozan, Mehmet Mahir Özmen","doi":"10.21037/ALES-20-30","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.21037/ALES-20-30","url":null,"abstract":"Initially sleeve gastrectomy (SG) was performed as an open procedure in 1988, known as Hess and Marceau’s technique, which is actually the first stage of the bilio-pancreatic diversion-duodenal switch (BPD-DS). It was proposed in 1993 as a single weight-loss procedure defined by Johnston, later known as operation Magenstrasse and Mill. In 1999 Gagner was the first to describe laparoscopic SG technique. Therefore SG became popular and one of the most common bariatric surgery procedure in the world. The method has many technical differences. Unfortunately, there is still no strict standardization of the method. With the development of technology, robotic surgery has taken its place in bariatric surgery field. A lot of new studies on robotic SG (RSG) have recently been published. Also there are several technical conflict, such as distance from the pylorus, resection of greater curvature, size of the antrum, use of bougie, fundus resection, whether or not reinforce the staple line, identification and repair of the hiatus. There are also some contraindications for SG. Barrett’s esophagus is a one of them. These variations in the technique affect the complications and effectiveness of surgery. In this study, we aimed to discuss the development and modifications of SG steps of with the current literature review.","PeriodicalId":8024,"journal":{"name":"Annals of Laparoscopic and Endoscopic Surgery","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.5,"publicationDate":"2020-12-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.21037/ALES-20-30","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"42837924","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2
AB004. OP-4 Do complications end the effectiveness of sleeve gastrectomy? AB004.OP-4袖状胃切除术的疗效是否因并发症而终止?
IF 0.5 4区 医学 Q3 Medicine Pub Date : 2020-11-30 DOI: 10.21037/ales-2019-bms-15
E. Gemici, H. Seyit
{"title":"AB004. OP-4 Do complications end the effectiveness of sleeve gastrectomy?","authors":"E. Gemici, H. Seyit","doi":"10.21037/ales-2019-bms-15","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.21037/ales-2019-bms-15","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":8024,"journal":{"name":"Annals of Laparoscopic and Endoscopic Surgery","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.5,"publicationDate":"2020-11-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"43651337","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
AB009. OP-9 Correlation between meal frequency and body mass index of obese individuals before laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy AB009。OP-9肥胖者腹腔镜袖胃切除术前进餐频率与体重指数的相关性
IF 0.5 4区 医学 Q3 Medicine Pub Date : 2020-11-30 DOI: 10.21037/ales-2019-bms-20
C. Arslan, M. Atabey
Background: Obesity is one of the most important health problems today due to its increased prevalence and chronic diseases it causes. It is known that meal pattern of individuals is important in body weight control. With this perspective, we aimed to determine the correlation between the number of meals and body mass index (BMI) of the patients evaluated before laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy. Methods: Between 2018–2019, 22 patients who were admitted for laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy were reviewed retrospectively. Twenty-four-hour food consumption of each patient was recorded. They were divided into 2 groups as those who had less than 3 meals and those who had 3 or more meals. Height measurements and detailed body analysis of both groups were performed. The height (cm) and weight (kg) data and the BMI were calculated. BMI = (Body weight (kg) / Height (m)) formula was used. Results: It was observed that of the 22 patients, 40.91% (n=9) had less than 3 meals, while 59.09% (n=13) had 3 or more meals. The average BMI of those having less than 3 meals was 39.97 kg/m (n=9, min =34.6 kg/m, max =47.2 kg/m). The average BMI of individuals who had 3 or more meals was 42.43 kg/m (n=13, min =35.3 kg/m, max =62.4 kg/m). BMI values being lower in individuals who had less than 3 meals is found to be statistically (P<0.001) significant. Conclusions: When the patients in our study group were evaluated, it was observed that individuals who had less than 3 meals had lower BMI values than those who had 3 or more meals. Further studies should be conducted to demonstrate this relationship by examining food patterns and calorie intake per meal in broader patient groups.
背景:肥胖是当今最重要的健康问题之一,因为它的患病率和慢性疾病的增加。众所周知,个体的饮食模式对控制体重很重要。从这个角度来看,我们旨在确定在腹腔镜袖胃切除术前评估的患者的进餐次数与体重指数(BMI)之间的相关性。方法:回顾性分析2018-2019年收治的22例腹腔镜袖胃切除术患者。记录每例患者24小时的摄食量。他们被分成两组,一组少于三顿饭,另一组超过三顿饭。两组均进行身高测量和详细的体格分析。计算身高(cm)、体重(kg)及BMI。BMI =(体重(kg) /身高(m))结果:22例患者中,40.91% (n=9)的用餐时间小于3次,59.09% (n=13)的用餐时间大于或等于3次。进餐少于3次的平均BMI为39.97 kg/m (n=9, min =34.6 kg/m, max =47.2 kg/m)。进食3顿及以上的个体的平均BMI为42.43 kg/m (n=13, min =35.3 kg/m, max =62.4 kg/m)。三餐少于3顿的人BMI值更低,这在统计学上是显著的(P<0.001)。结论:在对我们研究组的患者进行评估时,我们观察到,少于3餐的个体的BMI值低于3餐或更多餐的个体。应该进行进一步的研究,通过在更广泛的患者群体中检查食物模式和每餐卡路里摄入量来证明这种关系。
{"title":"AB009. OP-9 Correlation between meal frequency and body mass index of obese individuals before laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy","authors":"C. Arslan, M. Atabey","doi":"10.21037/ales-2019-bms-20","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.21037/ales-2019-bms-20","url":null,"abstract":"Background: Obesity is one of the most important health problems today due to its increased prevalence and chronic diseases it causes. It is known that meal pattern of individuals is important in body weight control. With this perspective, we aimed to determine the correlation between the number of meals and body mass index (BMI) of the patients evaluated before laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy. Methods: Between 2018–2019, 22 patients who were admitted for laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy were reviewed retrospectively. Twenty-four-hour food consumption of each patient was recorded. They were divided into 2 groups as those who had less than 3 meals and those who had 3 or more meals. Height measurements and detailed body analysis of both groups were performed. The height (cm) and weight (kg) data and the BMI were calculated. BMI = (Body weight (kg) / Height (m)) formula was used. Results: It was observed that of the 22 patients, 40.91% (n=9) had less than 3 meals, while 59.09% (n=13) had 3 or more meals. The average BMI of those having less than 3 meals was 39.97 kg/m (n=9, min =34.6 kg/m, max =47.2 kg/m). The average BMI of individuals who had 3 or more meals was 42.43 kg/m (n=13, min =35.3 kg/m, max =62.4 kg/m). BMI values being lower in individuals who had less than 3 meals is found to be statistically (P<0.001) significant. Conclusions: When the patients in our study group were evaluated, it was observed that individuals who had less than 3 meals had lower BMI values than those who had 3 or more meals. Further studies should be conducted to demonstrate this relationship by examining food patterns and calorie intake per meal in broader patient groups.","PeriodicalId":8024,"journal":{"name":"Annals of Laparoscopic and Endoscopic Surgery","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.5,"publicationDate":"2020-11-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"68295010","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
AB007. OP-7 The knowledge, attitude, and behavioral levels of 5th and 6th grade medical students on obesity, bariatric and metabolic surgery: a survey study AB007。5年级和6年级医学生关于肥胖、减肥和代谢手术的知识、态度和行为水平:一项调查研究
IF 0.5 4区 医学 Q3 Medicine Pub Date : 2020-11-30 DOI: 10.21037/ales-2019-bms-18
H. Özgüç, Mustafa Narmanlı, Okan Aydın, Hakan Çirnak
{"title":"AB007. OP-7 The knowledge, attitude, and behavioral levels of 5th and 6th grade medical students on obesity, bariatric and metabolic surgery: a survey study","authors":"H. Özgüç, Mustafa Narmanlı, Okan Aydın, Hakan Çirnak","doi":"10.21037/ales-2019-bms-18","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.21037/ales-2019-bms-18","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":8024,"journal":{"name":"Annals of Laparoscopic and Endoscopic Surgery","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.5,"publicationDate":"2020-11-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"42960751","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
期刊
Annals of Laparoscopic and Endoscopic Surgery
全部 Acc. Chem. Res. ACS Applied Bio Materials ACS Appl. Electron. Mater. ACS Appl. Energy Mater. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces ACS Appl. Nano Mater. ACS Appl. Polym. Mater. ACS BIOMATER-SCI ENG ACS Catal. ACS Cent. Sci. ACS Chem. Biol. ACS Chemical Health & Safety ACS Chem. Neurosci. ACS Comb. Sci. ACS Earth Space Chem. ACS Energy Lett. ACS Infect. Dis. ACS Macro Lett. ACS Mater. Lett. ACS Med. Chem. Lett. ACS Nano ACS Omega ACS Photonics ACS Sens. ACS Sustainable Chem. Eng. ACS Synth. Biol. Anal. Chem. BIOCHEMISTRY-US Bioconjugate Chem. BIOMACROMOLECULES Chem. Res. Toxicol. Chem. Rev. Chem. Mater. CRYST GROWTH DES ENERG FUEL Environ. Sci. Technol. Environ. Sci. Technol. Lett. Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. IND ENG CHEM RES Inorg. Chem. J. Agric. Food. Chem. J. Chem. Eng. Data J. Chem. Educ. J. Chem. Inf. Model. J. Chem. Theory Comput. J. Med. Chem. J. Nat. Prod. J PROTEOME RES J. Am. Chem. Soc. LANGMUIR MACROMOLECULES Mol. Pharmaceutics Nano Lett. Org. Lett. ORG PROCESS RES DEV ORGANOMETALLICS J. Org. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. A J. Phys. Chem. B J. Phys. Chem. C J. Phys. Chem. Lett. Analyst Anal. Methods Biomater. Sci. Catal. Sci. Technol. Chem. Commun. Chem. Soc. Rev. CHEM EDUC RES PRACT CRYSTENGCOMM Dalton Trans. Energy Environ. Sci. ENVIRON SCI-NANO ENVIRON SCI-PROC IMP ENVIRON SCI-WAT RES Faraday Discuss. Food Funct. Green Chem. Inorg. Chem. Front. Integr. Biol. J. Anal. At. Spectrom. J. Mater. Chem. A J. Mater. Chem. B J. Mater. Chem. C Lab Chip Mater. Chem. Front. Mater. Horiz. MEDCHEMCOMM Metallomics Mol. Biosyst. Mol. Syst. Des. Eng. Nanoscale Nanoscale Horiz. Nat. Prod. Rep. New J. Chem. Org. Biomol. Chem. Org. Chem. Front. PHOTOCH PHOTOBIO SCI PCCP Polym. Chem.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1