Italian heart journal : official journal of the Italian Federation of Cardiology最新文献

Left atrial evaluation is strongly linked to the history of cardiac imaging. In the past, the importance of this chamber has been largely downplayed because cineangiography could not visualize it directly. Nowadays echocardiography can easily assess left and right atrial size and function. Left atrial enlargement is frequent in many cardiac diseases. A main determinant of left atrial volume is ventricular diastolic function. It has recently been suggested that left atrial volume might be the morphophysiologic expression of chronic diastolic function. In fact the left atrium is exposed directly to left ventricular diastolic pressure through the open mitral valve and because of its thin wall structure it tends to dilate with increasing pressure. Other important determinants of atrial volume are the degree of ventricular remodeling, mitral regurgitation and the presence of atrial fibrillation. The degree of left atrial enlargement is associated with adverse prognosis in different clinical settings. Patients with dilated cardiomyopathy and with a left atrial volume > 68 ml/m2 have a 3.8-fold risk compared with those with smaller left atrial volume. The predictive value of left atrial volume is independent of left ventricular systolic and diastolic function, mitral regurgitation and atrial fibrillation. This is noteworthy because these factors are both determinant of left atrial volume and have a strong impact on outcome. It might be concluded that left atrial volume represents a powerful predictive marker because it is a window allowing comprehensive evaluation of several factors associated with bad prognosis, which are often difficult to document separately.

In patients with acute ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI), in order to shorten the time to definitive treatment, it is essential to coordinate the intervention between the local healthcare system and the hospitals. In 1999, a Working Group for Prehospital Emergency in Cardiology was established in Milan, and a network for 12-lead ECG transmission between advances life support (ALS) ambulances, the headquarter of 118 Rescue Service and the Coronary Care Units (CCU) or Divisions of Cardiology was developed: between February 1, 2001 and May 1, 2005, 6821 patients with suspected heart attack were rescued and their ECG recorded and transmitted (177 patients/month, 20% of them with an ST-segment shift, 11% ST-segment elevation, 9% non-ST-segment elevation, 24% with normal ECG). The rate of false positive automatic diagnosis of acute myocardial infarction was 0.3%, the rate of false negative was 0.8%. Forty-six patients with ventricular fibrillation underwent DC-shock. After May 1, 2004, clinical data of patients with STEMI transferred to the hospitals by ALS ambulances were reported in a database: 82% of the 89 patients were treated with primary angioplasty. The time (median, interquartile ranges) between ECG arrival to the CCU and the ECG report was 2 min (1-5), between ECG arrival to the CCU and patient arrival to the hospital was 34 min (24-42), between ECG arrival to the CCU and primary angioplasty was 69 min (50-93); the door-to-balloon time was 33 min (22-60). The telephone ECG transmission has been demonstrated to be a useful and rapid tool, easy to use; the automatic ECG diagnosis was accurate. In patients with STEMI the telephone ECG transmission shortened the time of delivery of therapy, helped to recover arrhythmic complications, allowed both the coordination between the 118 System and the Divisions of Cardiology and the implementation of the triage for primary angioplasty. Increasing the technological level of the service will be the next step of the program: the protocol will be upgraded in order to increase the number of patients rescued, to shorten the time of operation and to administer prehospital fibrinolytic therapy in selected patients.

This paper reports the rationale for the cardiovascular protective effects of angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors and reviews the overall results of recent randomized clinical trials. ACE-inhibitors prevent degradation of bradykinin, exert anti-ischemic action, inhibit thrombosis and platelet aggregation, are antiatherogenic, improve endothelial function and vessel remodeling, and have anti-inflammatory properties. Previous trials have shown that ACE-inhibitors reduce cardiovascular events in patients with heart failure or ventricular dysfunction. These findings have recently been extended to patients with lower risk profile, no evidence of heart failure and in secondary prevention using lipophilic ACE-inhibitors with high affinity for tissue ACE, i.e. those most likely to have high antiatherosclerotic efficacy. The central role of long-acting lipophilic ACE-inhibitors for cardiovascular protection has been clearly established and they should now be considered as a routine treatment for secondary prevention in the same way as aspirin, beta-blockers and statins.

The trials with angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors have followed a particular trend: in the first studies treatment was provided to severely ill patients several time (months or year) after the acute event. Thereafter, in few studies ACE-inhibitors were provided within 2 weeks of the event to patients with left ventricular dysfunction after acute myocardial infarction (AMI). In other megatrials ACE-inhibitors were started in unselected patients 24 hours after AMI. Thus, the trend is to provide treatment as early as possible to less selected patients. Recently, ACE-inhibitors have been successfully tested not only to treat the consequences of an infarct, but also to prevent its occurrence. EUROPA is the trial that demonstrated that perindopril (8 mg/day) is indicated in all coronary artery disease patients to reduce cardiovascular mortality and occurrence of AMI. The Perindopril and Remodelling in the Elderly with Acute Myocardial Infarction (PREAMI) is another trial recently terminated in elderly post-AMI patients with preserved left ventricular function. Although not associated with better clinical outcomes (most likely because of the rather short treatment period, 1 year), perindopril significantly reduced the combined primary endpoint (death, hospitalization for heart failure and remodeling) and prevented the progressive left ventricular remodeling occurring in elderly patients even in the presence of small infarct size.

Myocardial bridging may be associated with an unfavorable prognosis in patients with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy. We describe a case of a young symptomatic patient with myocardial bridging associated with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy successfully treated by surgical unroofing. Such a procedure should be strongly recommended in patients with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy.

Improvement of stent deployment techniques and advances in antiplatelet therapy have shown that stenting in the setting of ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) is safe and effective. Randomized trials have found that as compared to balloon angioplasty, coronary stenting does not reduce mortality and reinfarction, despite the reduction in target vessel revascularization. Furthermore, these benefits seem to be reduced when applied to unselected patients with STEMI. Direct stenting represents an attractive strategy with potential benefits in terms of myocardial perfusion. Future randomized trials are needed to evaluate if this strategy is associated with a significant impact on outcome, and to provide cost-benefit analysis of an unrestricted use of drug-eluting stent in this high-risk subset of patients. Data from randomized trials have shown that the additional use of abciximab reduces mortality in primary angioplasty. Since the feasibility of long-distance transportation has been shown in several randomized trials, early pharmacological pretreatment may confer further advantages by early recanalization and shorter ischemic time, particularly in high-risk patients. Further large randomized trials are needed to clarify the potential role of small molecules in primary angioplasty for STEMI.

Background: Primary percutaneous coronary intervention (pPCI) is the most effective reperfusion treatment of acute ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI), but logistic- and organization-related problems affect its feasibility. The aim of this study was to investigate a) the requirements of reperfusion therapies, and b) the feasibility of pPCI as suggested by the current guidelines, in the Veneto Region.

Methods: With the aim to treat with pPCI most of the patients with high-risk STEMI regardless of the type of admitting hospital, a single treatment protocol was developed and shared by the majority of Cardiology Departments in the Veneto Region. Data of all consecutive patients with STEMI were prospectively recorded and subsequently and independently compared with administrative data.

Results: In 28 participating hospitals, 1160 consecutive patients with STEMI were enrolled during a 6-month period: in 999 symptom onset was < 12 hours. Based on the registry data, it is possible to estimate that 697 patients/million of inhabitants/year are admitted in Cardiology Departments with the initial diagnosis of STEMI: 86% are admitted < 12 hours from symptom onset and 58% of them have at least one characteristic of high risk. The strategy of immediate coronary angiography and possible PCI was carried out in 52.3% of eligible patients: in 55.8 and 47.5% of high- and low-risk STEMI and from 17.1 to 75.1% based on the type of admitting hospital. Recanalization with pPCI was obtained < 90 min from the diagnosis in 70 and 32% of patients treated on site and transferred, respectively.

Conclusions: The absolute number of patients with STEMI eligible for reperfusion therapies is lower than previously reported. The reperfusion strategy based on pPCI was much more related to the type of admitting hospital than to the clinical characteristics of the patients. pPCI performed as suggested by the current guidelines is feasible in patients admitted in hospitals with interventional facilities available 24 hours/day, but in those who need to be transferred it is necessary to modify the existing pathways and/or treatment protocols.

Background: Although many observers consider the cardiovascular risk associated with isolated prehypertension to be low and not worth pharmacological treating, the cardiovascular disease rate is increased among individuals within this blood pressure stratum.

Methods: We performed Doppler echocardiography and submaximal bicycle ergometry in 20 nonsmoking sedentary prehypertensive subjects and 20 age- and sex-matched nonsmoking sedentary normotensive subjects, and investigated the association between the systolic blood pressure response to exercise (SBPRE) and hypertensive target organ damage. An exaggerated SBPRE (E-SBPRE) and a normal SBPRE (N-SBPRE) were diagnosed using the mean +2 standard deviations of systolic blood pressure at 100 W in normotensives.

Results: Body mass index was similar in the two groups. Resting blood pressure and systemic vascular resistance were higher in prehypertensives. Almost half the latter had an E-SBPRE. There were no differences in age, gender, and body mass index between normotensives and prehypertensives with an E-SBPRE or a N-SBPRE. Resting blood pressure and systemic vascular resistance were similarly increased in prehypertensives with an E-SBPRE and a N-SBPRE vs normotensives. Compared with normotensives, prehypertensives with an E-SBPRE showed: (a) a significantly greater left ventricular relative wall thickness, mostly due to a smaller cavity, (b) a significantly longer left ventricular isovolumic relaxation time, and (c) a significantly greater global arterial stiffness, as estimated by the pulse pressure/left ventricular stroke volume ratio.

Conclusions: Our findings suggest that an E-SBPRE is frequent among prehypertensive subjects and is associated with cardiovascular remodeling, which may herald cardiovascular disease.