Pub Date : 2026-01-01Epub Date: 2025-12-02DOI: 10.1097/SAP.0000000000004566
Emily A Green, Kyla N Shade, Diego A Gomez, Anton D Khechoyan, Jason W Yu, Timothy J Irwin, Brooke French, Phuong D Nguyen, David W Mathes, David Y Khechoyan
Background: Over 20,000 medical malpractice lawsuits are filed annually, with plastic surgeons being particularly vulnerable. The evolving medico-legal landscape-shaped by tort reform measures, such as damage caps, medical review panels, and rising defensive medicine costs-demands ongoing evaluation. This study provides a comprehensive and up-to-date analysis of recent legislative changes in medical malpractice law and their implications for Plastic Surgery.
Methods: Medical malpractice laws across all 50 states were reviewed using the LexisNexis Academic Database. Key legal parameters assessed included the presence of medical review panels, caps on noneconomic, economic, and punitive damages, minimum malpractice insurance requirements, and statutes of limitations for malpractice claims.
Results: Fourteen states have implemented medical review panels. Economic damage caps exist in 6 states, ranging from $500,000 to $2,250,000 (average: $1,133,333). Noneconomic damage caps are present in 32 states, ranging from $350,000 and $2,250,000 (average: $516,414). While 3 states prohibit punitive damages entirely, 19 states impose no limits, and the remaining 28 enforce caps, often linked to other compensatory awards. Most states enforce a 2-year statute of limitations, although variations exist based on injury discovery rules.
Conclusions: Despite extensive research on tort reform and malpractice trends, the long-term effects of recent legislative changes remain uncertain. Variability in medico-legal policies across states may influence physician availability, underscoring the need for ongoing analysis and advocacy. Physicians must remain vigilant in high-risk specialties, while broader collaboration between the medical and legal communities is essential to fostering a legal framework that supports-rather than obstructs-high-quality patient care.
{"title":"Current Landscape of Medicolegal Reform in the United States: A Plastic Surgery Perspective.","authors":"Emily A Green, Kyla N Shade, Diego A Gomez, Anton D Khechoyan, Jason W Yu, Timothy J Irwin, Brooke French, Phuong D Nguyen, David W Mathes, David Y Khechoyan","doi":"10.1097/SAP.0000000000004566","DOIUrl":"10.1097/SAP.0000000000004566","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Over 20,000 medical malpractice lawsuits are filed annually, with plastic surgeons being particularly vulnerable. The evolving medico-legal landscape-shaped by tort reform measures, such as damage caps, medical review panels, and rising defensive medicine costs-demands ongoing evaluation. This study provides a comprehensive and up-to-date analysis of recent legislative changes in medical malpractice law and their implications for Plastic Surgery.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Medical malpractice laws across all 50 states were reviewed using the LexisNexis Academic Database. Key legal parameters assessed included the presence of medical review panels, caps on noneconomic, economic, and punitive damages, minimum malpractice insurance requirements, and statutes of limitations for malpractice claims.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Fourteen states have implemented medical review panels. Economic damage caps exist in 6 states, ranging from $500,000 to $2,250,000 (average: $1,133,333). Noneconomic damage caps are present in 32 states, ranging from $350,000 and $2,250,000 (average: $516,414). While 3 states prohibit punitive damages entirely, 19 states impose no limits, and the remaining 28 enforce caps, often linked to other compensatory awards. Most states enforce a 2-year statute of limitations, although variations exist based on injury discovery rules.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Despite extensive research on tort reform and malpractice trends, the long-term effects of recent legislative changes remain uncertain. Variability in medico-legal policies across states may influence physician availability, underscoring the need for ongoing analysis and advocacy. Physicians must remain vigilant in high-risk specialties, while broader collaboration between the medical and legal communities is essential to fostering a legal framework that supports-rather than obstructs-high-quality patient care.</p>","PeriodicalId":8060,"journal":{"name":"Annals of Plastic Surgery","volume":"96 1","pages":"101-111"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6,"publicationDate":"2026-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145792647","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2026-01-01DOI: 10.1097/SAP.0000000000004570
Pooja Dhupati, Sara C Kisiel, Krishna Unadkat, Shelley S Noland
Abstract: Glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists (GLP-1RAs) are increasingly used for weight management and cardiometabolic health. Common peroneal neuropathy (CPN) associated with rapid weight loss is attributed to adipose tissue reduction and subsequent nerve compression at the fibular head. Cases of "Slimmer's Palsy" have been described in conditions involving rapid weight loss, including anorexia, malignancy, and post-biliary surgery, yet it remains underrecognized as a potential complication of GLP-1RA therapy. This case report describes two nondiabetic patients who developed acute foot drop after losing 14% and 18% of their total body weight over 3-6 months of semaglutide and tirzepatide use, respectively. As use of GLP-1RAs continues to rise, peripheral nerve surgeons should be aware of Slimmer's Palsy as a predictable and treatable complication of rapid weight loss and be prepared to intervene before permanent denervation occurs.
{"title":"GLP-1 Receptor Agonist-Associated Slimmer's Palsy: Implications for the Peripheral Nerve Surgeon.","authors":"Pooja Dhupati, Sara C Kisiel, Krishna Unadkat, Shelley S Noland","doi":"10.1097/SAP.0000000000004570","DOIUrl":"10.1097/SAP.0000000000004570","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Abstract: </strong>Glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists (GLP-1RAs) are increasingly used for weight management and cardiometabolic health. Common peroneal neuropathy (CPN) associated with rapid weight loss is attributed to adipose tissue reduction and subsequent nerve compression at the fibular head. Cases of \"Slimmer's Palsy\" have been described in conditions involving rapid weight loss, including anorexia, malignancy, and post-biliary surgery, yet it remains underrecognized as a potential complication of GLP-1RA therapy. This case report describes two nondiabetic patients who developed acute foot drop after losing 14% and 18% of their total body weight over 3-6 months of semaglutide and tirzepatide use, respectively. As use of GLP-1RAs continues to rise, peripheral nerve surgeons should be aware of Slimmer's Palsy as a predictable and treatable complication of rapid weight loss and be prepared to intervene before permanent denervation occurs.</p>","PeriodicalId":8060,"journal":{"name":"Annals of Plastic Surgery","volume":"96 1","pages":"69-74"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6,"publicationDate":"2026-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145792722","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2026-01-01Epub Date: 2025-10-22DOI: 10.1097/SAP.0000000000004534
Milan V Carter, Yasmine M Ibrahim, Naima S Batson, Sumun Khetpal, Wayne Ozaki, Jason Roostaeian
Background: Mohs Micrographic Surgery (MMS) is the gold standard for minimizing damage to healthy tissue surrounding nonmelanoma skin cancer. However, extensive or complex lesions may require reconstructive plastic surgery to restore form, function, and aesthetic outcomes for patients. Social determinants of health (SDOH)-including socioeconomic status, geographic location, healthcare access, and insurance coverage-significantly shape patient outcomes. Disparities in access to MMS and subsequent reconstruction remain underexplored. This review highlights the need for Mohs and reconstructive plastic surgeons involved in post-MMS reconstruction to consider social determinants of health (SDOH) in their practice.
Methods: A structured literature review was conducted through PubMed and Web of Science, adhering to the PRISMA guidelines. Search terms used included "facial reconstruction," "Mohs surgery," "social determinants of health," "social determinants," and "disparities," limiting the review to head and neck post-MMS cases. Eighteen articles met inclusion.
Results: Among the 18 studies that met the inclusion criteria, 11% (2/18) focused on skin cancer detection, 28% (5/18) focused on barriers to accessing MMS, 22% (4/18) explained patients' post-MMS outcomes, and 28% (5/18) focused on the desires for reconstructive surgery and outcomes, but only 11% (2/18) discussed reconstructive surgery post-MMS.
Conclusion: Although all included studies examined disparities in the Mohs surgery care continuum, only 2 of 18 specifically addressed disparities in access to post-MMS plastic surgery reconstruction. This highlights critical gaps in interdisciplinary collaboration between Mohs and reconstructive surgeons in initial skin cancer detection, MMS, and post-MMS reconstruction. These findings reflect real-world barriers, where patients face systemic challenges in obtaining timely and equitable reconstructive care. Future studies should examine how systemic, socioeconomic, and geographic barriers impact referrals and outcomes, and develop coordinated strategies between dermatology and plastic surgery to improve equitable access to reconstruction.
背景:莫氏显微手术(Mohs Micrographic Surgery, MMS)是将非黑色素瘤皮肤癌周围健康组织损伤降到最低的金标准。然而,广泛或复杂的病变可能需要重建整形手术来恢复患者的形态、功能和美学效果。健康的社会决定因素(SDOH)——包括社会经济地位、地理位置、医疗保健获取和保险覆盖——显著地影响着患者的预后。获得MMS和随后重建方面的差距仍未得到充分探讨。这篇综述强调了Mohs和参与mms后重建的重建整形外科医生在实践中考虑健康的社会决定因素(SDOH)的必要性。方法:遵循PRISMA指南,通过PubMed和Web of Science进行结构化文献综述。使用的搜索词包括“面部重建”、“莫氏手术”、“健康的社会决定因素”、“社会决定因素”和“差异”,限制了对mms后头颈部病例的审查。18篇文章符合纳入标准。结果:在符合纳入标准的18项研究中,11%(2/18)的研究重点是皮肤癌的检测,28%(5/18)的研究重点是获得MMS的障碍,22%(4/18)的研究重点是患者MMS后的结果,28%(5/18)的研究重点是患者对重建手术的渴望和结果,但只有11%(2/18)的研究讨论了MMS后的重建手术。结论:虽然所有纳入的研究都考察了Mohs手术护理连续性的差异,但18项研究中只有2项专门研究了mms后整形手术重建的差异。这突出了Mohs和重建外科医生在皮肤癌早期检测、MMS和MMS后重建方面的跨学科合作的关键差距。这些发现反映了现实世界的障碍,患者在获得及时和公平的重建治疗方面面临系统性挑战。未来的研究应该检查系统、社会经济和地理障碍如何影响转诊和结果,并制定皮肤病学和整形外科之间的协调策略,以提高公平获得重建的机会。
{"title":"The Missing Pipeline: Access to Plastic Surgery Reconstruction After Mohs Surgery for Head and Neck Skin Cancers.","authors":"Milan V Carter, Yasmine M Ibrahim, Naima S Batson, Sumun Khetpal, Wayne Ozaki, Jason Roostaeian","doi":"10.1097/SAP.0000000000004534","DOIUrl":"10.1097/SAP.0000000000004534","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Mohs Micrographic Surgery (MMS) is the gold standard for minimizing damage to healthy tissue surrounding nonmelanoma skin cancer. However, extensive or complex lesions may require reconstructive plastic surgery to restore form, function, and aesthetic outcomes for patients. Social determinants of health (SDOH)-including socioeconomic status, geographic location, healthcare access, and insurance coverage-significantly shape patient outcomes. Disparities in access to MMS and subsequent reconstruction remain underexplored. This review highlights the need for Mohs and reconstructive plastic surgeons involved in post-MMS reconstruction to consider social determinants of health (SDOH) in their practice.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A structured literature review was conducted through PubMed and Web of Science, adhering to the PRISMA guidelines. Search terms used included \"facial reconstruction,\" \"Mohs surgery,\" \"social determinants of health,\" \"social determinants,\" and \"disparities,\" limiting the review to head and neck post-MMS cases. Eighteen articles met inclusion.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among the 18 studies that met the inclusion criteria, 11% (2/18) focused on skin cancer detection, 28% (5/18) focused on barriers to accessing MMS, 22% (4/18) explained patients' post-MMS outcomes, and 28% (5/18) focused on the desires for reconstructive surgery and outcomes, but only 11% (2/18) discussed reconstructive surgery post-MMS.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Although all included studies examined disparities in the Mohs surgery care continuum, only 2 of 18 specifically addressed disparities in access to post-MMS plastic surgery reconstruction. This highlights critical gaps in interdisciplinary collaboration between Mohs and reconstructive surgeons in initial skin cancer detection, MMS, and post-MMS reconstruction. These findings reflect real-world barriers, where patients face systemic challenges in obtaining timely and equitable reconstructive care. Future studies should examine how systemic, socioeconomic, and geographic barriers impact referrals and outcomes, and develop coordinated strategies between dermatology and plastic surgery to improve equitable access to reconstruction.</p>","PeriodicalId":8060,"journal":{"name":"Annals of Plastic Surgery","volume":" ","pages":"117-123"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6,"publicationDate":"2026-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145353445","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2026-01-01Epub Date: 2025-12-01DOI: 10.1097/SAP.0000000000004560
Jude C Kluemper, Abdulaziz Elemosho, Emily Pfahl, Nathalie Sackey, Kerry-Ann S Mitchell
Background: Scalp burns pose a unique challenge to the reconstructive surgeon given the anatomical characteristics of the head and neck. This challenge is magnified in severe burn injuries extending to the calvarial bone. Several algorithms for scalp and calvarial reconstruction have been presented in the past. However, no consensus exists about the optimal reconstructive approach. Our aim is to develop a novel algorithm for scalp burn reconstruction based on the relevant literature as well as case observations from the growing multidisciplinary field of neuroplastic surgery.
Methods: A literature review of articles on PubMed, SCOPUS, and Web of Science focused on scalp and calvarial burn management was conducted. We also present relevant cases from our institution that demonstrate the neuroplastic surgery approach to reconstruction of complex burns in this region. An algorithmic approach based on relevant anatomy, reconstructive principles, and surgical techniques ranging from primary closure to cranioplasty to reconstruct scalp and skull defects following burns is proposed.
Results: A novel algorithmic approach based on the Harrison classification of injury was developed based on our literature review. We also present 2 relevant cases from our neuroplastic surgery practice. We determined that the initial and most important factor in scalp and calvarial management is the integrity of the pericranium. Other factors such as patient's compliance and cosmetic needs may also determine treatment approach.
Conclusions: Management of scalp burns can be simplified using an algorithmic approach. We anticipate this work will help guide and improve reconstructive management for scalp and calvarial burn patients for reconstructive surgeons, burn surgeons, and particularly surgeons in resource-poor settings faced with treating severe scalp and calvarial burns.
背景:考虑到头颈部的解剖特征,头皮烧伤对重建外科医生提出了一个独特的挑战。这种挑战在严重烧伤延伸到颅骨时被放大。过去已经提出了几种头皮和颅骨重建的算法。然而,对于最佳的重建方法尚无共识。我们的目标是基于相关文献以及神经整形外科这一不断发展的多学科领域的病例观察,开发一种新的头皮烧伤重建算法。方法:对PubMed、SCOPUS和Web of Science上有关头皮和头颅烧伤治疗的文章进行文献回顾。我们也介绍了本机构的相关病例,证明了神经整形外科方法可以重建该地区的复杂烧伤。本文提出了一种基于相关解剖学、重建原理和外科技术的算法方法,从初步闭合到颅骨成形术,以重建烧伤后的头皮和颅骨缺陷。结果:在文献回顾的基础上,我们提出了一种基于哈里森损伤分类的新算法。同时,我们也将介绍来自神经整形外科实践的2例相关病例。我们认为,头皮和颅骨治疗的首要和最重要的因素是颅周的完整性。其他因素,如患者的依从性和美容需求也可能决定治疗方法。结论:使用算法方法可以简化头皮烧伤的处理。我们期望这项工作将有助于指导和改善重建外科医生,烧伤外科医生,特别是在资源贫乏的地区面临治疗严重头皮和颅骨烧伤的外科医生对头皮和颅骨烧伤患者的重建管理。
{"title":"Algorithmic Approach to Management of Complex Scalp and Calvarial Burn Injuries.","authors":"Jude C Kluemper, Abdulaziz Elemosho, Emily Pfahl, Nathalie Sackey, Kerry-Ann S Mitchell","doi":"10.1097/SAP.0000000000004560","DOIUrl":"10.1097/SAP.0000000000004560","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Scalp burns pose a unique challenge to the reconstructive surgeon given the anatomical characteristics of the head and neck. This challenge is magnified in severe burn injuries extending to the calvarial bone. Several algorithms for scalp and calvarial reconstruction have been presented in the past. However, no consensus exists about the optimal reconstructive approach. Our aim is to develop a novel algorithm for scalp burn reconstruction based on the relevant literature as well as case observations from the growing multidisciplinary field of neuroplastic surgery.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A literature review of articles on PubMed, SCOPUS, and Web of Science focused on scalp and calvarial burn management was conducted. We also present relevant cases from our institution that demonstrate the neuroplastic surgery approach to reconstruction of complex burns in this region. An algorithmic approach based on relevant anatomy, reconstructive principles, and surgical techniques ranging from primary closure to cranioplasty to reconstruct scalp and skull defects following burns is proposed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A novel algorithmic approach based on the Harrison classification of injury was developed based on our literature review. We also present 2 relevant cases from our neuroplastic surgery practice. We determined that the initial and most important factor in scalp and calvarial management is the integrity of the pericranium. Other factors such as patient's compliance and cosmetic needs may also determine treatment approach.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Management of scalp burns can be simplified using an algorithmic approach. We anticipate this work will help guide and improve reconstructive management for scalp and calvarial burn patients for reconstructive surgeons, burn surgeons, and particularly surgeons in resource-poor settings faced with treating severe scalp and calvarial burns.</p>","PeriodicalId":8060,"journal":{"name":"Annals of Plastic Surgery","volume":" ","pages":"31-38"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6,"publicationDate":"2026-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145647303","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2026-01-01Epub Date: 2025-12-01DOI: 10.1097/SAP.0000000000004577
Jacob D Franke, Andrew L Blount, Andrea Van Pelt, Ewa Komorowska-Timek
Background: Bioresorbable hyaluronate-carboxymethylcellulose membranes (HA membrane) have been applied to prevent adhesion formation following gynecologic and abdominal procedures. However, the use of HA membrane to enhance flap delay has not been well described. We present a novel application of HA membranes as barriers in delayed flaps for reconstructive surgery.
Methods: All cases where HA membrane was utilized as a barrier to separate the undersurface of the flap from its respective wound bed during a delay procedure by the senior surgeon were reviewed. Indications for use of the HA membrane included patient risk factors, flap selection, or wound size.
Results: The HA membrane was used in 4 patients undergoing flap reconstruction with a delay procedure. Flaps included were the reverse sural fasciocutaneous flap, trapezius myocutaneous flap, and 2 paramedian forehead flaps. All of the donor wound beds showed no residual HA membrane and no tissue adherence, thus allowing minimal repeat dissection. All flaps were viable without signs of infection. All of the flaps in this study healed without any complications. There were no instances of infection, venous congestion, or delayed wound healing.
Conclusion: HA membranes can safely serve as degradable barriers in flaps undergoing the delay phenomenon. We speculate that HA membrane reduces reestablishment of microvascular network between the flap and its wound bed and may contribute to augmentation of the remaining circulation within the delayed flap.
{"title":"Hyaluronic-Carboxymethylcellulose Membrane as a Biologic Barrier in Flap Delay.","authors":"Jacob D Franke, Andrew L Blount, Andrea Van Pelt, Ewa Komorowska-Timek","doi":"10.1097/SAP.0000000000004577","DOIUrl":"10.1097/SAP.0000000000004577","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Bioresorbable hyaluronate-carboxymethylcellulose membranes (HA membrane) have been applied to prevent adhesion formation following gynecologic and abdominal procedures. However, the use of HA membrane to enhance flap delay has not been well described. We present a novel application of HA membranes as barriers in delayed flaps for reconstructive surgery.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>All cases where HA membrane was utilized as a barrier to separate the undersurface of the flap from its respective wound bed during a delay procedure by the senior surgeon were reviewed. Indications for use of the HA membrane included patient risk factors, flap selection, or wound size.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The HA membrane was used in 4 patients undergoing flap reconstruction with a delay procedure. Flaps included were the reverse sural fasciocutaneous flap, trapezius myocutaneous flap, and 2 paramedian forehead flaps. All of the donor wound beds showed no residual HA membrane and no tissue adherence, thus allowing minimal repeat dissection. All flaps were viable without signs of infection. All of the flaps in this study healed without any complications. There were no instances of infection, venous congestion, or delayed wound healing.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>HA membranes can safely serve as degradable barriers in flaps undergoing the delay phenomenon. We speculate that HA membrane reduces reestablishment of microvascular network between the flap and its wound bed and may contribute to augmentation of the remaining circulation within the delayed flap.</p>","PeriodicalId":8060,"journal":{"name":"Annals of Plastic Surgery","volume":" ","pages":"75-78"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6,"publicationDate":"2026-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145647278","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-12-29DOI: 10.1097/SAP.0000000000004608
Pranav Rajaram, Megan Lane, Nazanin Andalibi, Oliver L Haimson, Rachel C Hooper, Hannes Prescher
{"title":"Beyond Autonomy: A Plastic Surgeon's Responsibility in the Face of AI-Driven Misinformation.","authors":"Pranav Rajaram, Megan Lane, Nazanin Andalibi, Oliver L Haimson, Rachel C Hooper, Hannes Prescher","doi":"10.1097/SAP.0000000000004608","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1097/SAP.0000000000004608","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":8060,"journal":{"name":"Annals of Plastic Surgery","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.6,"publicationDate":"2025-12-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145843346","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-12-29DOI: 10.1097/SAP.0000000000004609
Zijun Li, Yang An
{"title":"Comment on \"Long-Term Outcome of the Nasal Base Tripod in Patients With Unilateral Cleft Lip\".","authors":"Zijun Li, Yang An","doi":"10.1097/SAP.0000000000004609","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1097/SAP.0000000000004609","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":8060,"journal":{"name":"Annals of Plastic Surgery","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.6,"publicationDate":"2025-12-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145843413","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-12-29DOI: 10.1097/SAP.0000000000004588
Kendall C Pitre, Emily E Hecox, Ronald R McCall, Ian C Hoppe, Laura S Humphries
Introduction: American Cleft Palate and Craniofacial Association (ACPA) teams consist of trained professionals collaborating in an interdisciplinary approach to optimize outcomes for patients with cleft palate. Orthodontic care is essential to correct dental malocclusion, guide maxillary growth, enhance surgical outcomes, and improve oral function and aesthetics. Although ACPA approval requires an orthodontist in the multidisciplinary team, the methods of delivering orthodontic care remain unclear. This project aims to elucidate how orthodontic care is integrated into ACPA teams.
Methods: A list of ACPA teams (n = 204) and reported orthodontists (n = 374) was obtained from the ACPA directory. Teams outside the US. and duplicate listings were excluded. Each team's website was reviewed to identify orthodontists, care delivery types (university/hospital, private practice, mixed, not listed), and orthodontic craniofacial fellowship status. Team geographic distribution was compared across the 4 US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) Census regions: West, Midwest, South, and Northeast.
Results: Among 184 ACPA-approved teams, only 46.7% listed an orthodontist on their public websites, despite guidelines requiring orthodontic inclusion. The most common care model was university/hospital-based (25%), followed by private practice (18.5%), with variation across teams (P < 0.001). Only 16.3% of teams included a craniofacial fellowship-trained orthodontist, whereas over half did not report training status. Private practice teams were less likely to include a fellowship-trained orthodontist compared to university/hospital-based teams (OR, 0.086; P < 0.001). Most teams had 1 to 2 orthodontists (mean, 1.84), with no difference by region or care model. Regionally, the South had the highest proportion of teams (33.2%) and orthodontists (33.2%), whereas the Northeast had the fewest. Fellowship-trained orthodontists were most common in the South but showed no regional difference (P = 0.989).
Discussion: Orthodontists are inconsistently represented across ACPA teams with limited public reporting and low rates of fellowship training. Variation in care delivery models and regional access highlights structural gaps in interdisciplinary cleft care. Standardizing orthodontic integration and increasing fellowship training may improve the consistency and equity of craniofacial care nationwide.
{"title":"Orthodontic Care Delivery Across ACPA Teams in the US.","authors":"Kendall C Pitre, Emily E Hecox, Ronald R McCall, Ian C Hoppe, Laura S Humphries","doi":"10.1097/SAP.0000000000004588","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1097/SAP.0000000000004588","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>American Cleft Palate and Craniofacial Association (ACPA) teams consist of trained professionals collaborating in an interdisciplinary approach to optimize outcomes for patients with cleft palate. Orthodontic care is essential to correct dental malocclusion, guide maxillary growth, enhance surgical outcomes, and improve oral function and aesthetics. Although ACPA approval requires an orthodontist in the multidisciplinary team, the methods of delivering orthodontic care remain unclear. This project aims to elucidate how orthodontic care is integrated into ACPA teams.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A list of ACPA teams (n = 204) and reported orthodontists (n = 374) was obtained from the ACPA directory. Teams outside the US. and duplicate listings were excluded. Each team's website was reviewed to identify orthodontists, care delivery types (university/hospital, private practice, mixed, not listed), and orthodontic craniofacial fellowship status. Team geographic distribution was compared across the 4 US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) Census regions: West, Midwest, South, and Northeast.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among 184 ACPA-approved teams, only 46.7% listed an orthodontist on their public websites, despite guidelines requiring orthodontic inclusion. The most common care model was university/hospital-based (25%), followed by private practice (18.5%), with variation across teams (P < 0.001). Only 16.3% of teams included a craniofacial fellowship-trained orthodontist, whereas over half did not report training status. Private practice teams were less likely to include a fellowship-trained orthodontist compared to university/hospital-based teams (OR, 0.086; P < 0.001). Most teams had 1 to 2 orthodontists (mean, 1.84), with no difference by region or care model. Regionally, the South had the highest proportion of teams (33.2%) and orthodontists (33.2%), whereas the Northeast had the fewest. Fellowship-trained orthodontists were most common in the South but showed no regional difference (P = 0.989).</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>Orthodontists are inconsistently represented across ACPA teams with limited public reporting and low rates of fellowship training. Variation in care delivery models and regional access highlights structural gaps in interdisciplinary cleft care. Standardizing orthodontic integration and increasing fellowship training may improve the consistency and equity of craniofacial care nationwide.</p>","PeriodicalId":8060,"journal":{"name":"Annals of Plastic Surgery","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.6,"publicationDate":"2025-12-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145843362","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-12-29DOI: 10.1097/SAP.0000000000004579
Dana Andari, Charanya Vijayakumar, Roland K Assaf, Rami Kantar, Denise Franco Mera, Beyhan Annan, Jordan Swanson, Usama S Hamdan
Abstract: Outreach medical programs refer to medical or surgical care initiatives provided by volunteer teams typically from higher income countries and last from a few days to 8 weeks. To appreciate the development and empowerment of the onsite team, the use of "Sustainable Health Programs" (SHP) has become the preferred terminology at Global Smile Foundation. This study aims to review the challenges faced with implementing SHPs and propose a framework with the goal of implementing successful and sustainable programs. The cornerstone of such success is forging long-term, bidirectional partnerships with local healthcare teams, empowering them not only with clinical skills but also with the ability to mobilize resources independently. A SHP's success is gauged by how well it strengthens the local system to carry the mission forward long after the international team departs.
{"title":"Sustainable Health Programs: Challenges and Pathways to Success.","authors":"Dana Andari, Charanya Vijayakumar, Roland K Assaf, Rami Kantar, Denise Franco Mera, Beyhan Annan, Jordan Swanson, Usama S Hamdan","doi":"10.1097/SAP.0000000000004579","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1097/SAP.0000000000004579","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Abstract: </strong>Outreach medical programs refer to medical or surgical care initiatives provided by volunteer teams typically from higher income countries and last from a few days to 8 weeks. To appreciate the development and empowerment of the onsite team, the use of \"Sustainable Health Programs\" (SHP) has become the preferred terminology at Global Smile Foundation. This study aims to review the challenges faced with implementing SHPs and propose a framework with the goal of implementing successful and sustainable programs. The cornerstone of such success is forging long-term, bidirectional partnerships with local healthcare teams, empowering them not only with clinical skills but also with the ability to mobilize resources independently. A SHP's success is gauged by how well it strengthens the local system to carry the mission forward long after the international team departs.</p>","PeriodicalId":8060,"journal":{"name":"Annals of Plastic Surgery","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.6,"publicationDate":"2025-12-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145843370","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Preserving Function in Sternal Reconstruction: Complementary Roles of Pectoralis Major and Internal Mammary Artery Perforator Flaps.","authors":"Elise Lupon, Pharel Njessi, Olivier Camuzard, Benoît Chaput, Silvia Gandolfi","doi":"10.1097/SAP.0000000000004618","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1097/SAP.0000000000004618","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":8060,"journal":{"name":"Annals of Plastic Surgery","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.6,"publicationDate":"2025-12-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145817457","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}