Pub Date : 2024-11-21DOI: 10.1308/rcsann.2024.0049
D J Howgate, P Garfjeld Roberts, A Palmer, A Price, A Taylor, J L Rees, B Kendrick
Introduction: The aim of this study was to determine the impact of operating surgeon grade and level of supervision on the incidence of one-year patient mortality and all-cause revision following elective primary total hip replacement (THR).
Methods: National Joint Registry data from 2005 to 2020 for a single University Teaching Hospital were used, with analysis performed on the 15-year dataset divided into 5-year block periods (B1, 2005-2010; B2, 2010-2015; B3, 2015-2020). Outcome measures were mortality and revision surgery at one year, in relation to lead surgeon grade, and level of supervision for trainee-led (TL) operations.
Results: A total of 9,999 eligible primary THRs were performed, of which 5,526 (55.3%) were consultant-led (CL), and 4,473 (44.7%) TL. Of TL, 2,404 (53.7%) were nonconsultant-supervised (TU) and 2,069 (46.3%) consultant-supervised (TS). The incidence of one-year patient mortality was 2.05% (n=205), and all-cause revision was 1.11% (n=111). There was no difference in one-year mortality between TL and CL operations (p=0.20, odds ratio (OR) 0.78, confidence interval (CI) 0.55-1.10). The incidence of one-year revision was not different for TL and CL operations (p=0.15, OR 1.37, CI 0.89-2.09). Overall, there was no temporal change for either outcome measure between TL or CL operations. A significant increase in revision within one-year was observed in B3 between TU compared with CL operations (p=0.005, OR 2.81, CI 1.35-5.87).
Conclusions: We found no difference in overall one-year mortality or all-cause revision rate between TL and CL primary THR. Despite a reduction in unsupervised THR in the latest five-year period (2015-2020), unsupervised TL THR resulted in an increased risk of early revision.
{"title":"The risk of revision surgery after trainee-led primary total hip replacement.","authors":"D J Howgate, P Garfjeld Roberts, A Palmer, A Price, A Taylor, J L Rees, B Kendrick","doi":"10.1308/rcsann.2024.0049","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1308/rcsann.2024.0049","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>The aim of this study was to determine the impact of operating surgeon grade and level of supervision on the incidence of one-year patient mortality and all-cause revision following elective primary total hip replacement (THR).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>National Joint Registry data from 2005 to 2020 for a single University Teaching Hospital were used, with analysis performed on the 15-year dataset divided into 5-year block periods (B1, 2005-2010; B2, 2010-2015; B3, 2015-2020). Outcome measures were mortality and revision surgery at one year, in relation to lead surgeon grade, and level of supervision for trainee-led (TL) operations.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 9,999 eligible primary THRs were performed, of which 5,526 (55.3%) were consultant-led (CL), and 4,473 (44.7%) TL. Of TL, 2,404 (53.7%) were nonconsultant-supervised (TU) and 2,069 (46.3%) consultant-supervised (TS). The incidence of one-year patient mortality was 2.05% (<i>n</i>=205), and all-cause revision was 1.11% (<i>n</i>=111). There was no difference in one-year mortality between TL and CL operations (<i>p</i>=0.20, odds ratio (OR) 0.78, confidence interval (CI) 0.55-1.10). The incidence of one-year revision was not different for TL and CL operations (<i>p</i>=0.15, OR 1.37, CI 0.89-2.09). Overall, there was no temporal change for either outcome measure between TL or CL operations. A significant increase in revision within one-year was observed in B3 between TU compared with CL operations (<i>p</i>=0.005, OR 2.81, CI 1.35-5.87).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>We found no difference in overall one-year mortality or all-cause revision rate between TL and CL primary THR. Despite a reduction in unsupervised THR in the latest five-year period (2015-2020), unsupervised TL THR resulted in an increased risk of early revision.</p>","PeriodicalId":8088,"journal":{"name":"Annals of the Royal College of Surgeons of England","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.1,"publicationDate":"2024-11-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142680675","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-11-21DOI: 10.1308/rcsann.2024.0068
M A Langford, W Chow, P Kalu, J Birch
{"title":"A novel adaption to suction-assisted seroma aspiration.","authors":"M A Langford, W Chow, P Kalu, J Birch","doi":"10.1308/rcsann.2024.0068","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1308/rcsann.2024.0068","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":8088,"journal":{"name":"Annals of the Royal College of Surgeons of England","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.1,"publicationDate":"2024-11-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142680672","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-11-21DOI: 10.1308/rcsann.2024.0091
P May-Miller, Map Ligthart, A R Darbyshire, S Rahman, P H Pucher, N J Curtis, M A West
Introduction: Emergency surgical admissions represent the most unwell patients admitted to any hospital. Frailty and body composition independently identify risk of adverse outcomes but are seldom combined to predict outcomes in emergency patients. We aim to determine the relationships between frailty, body composition analyses (BCA) and mortality in an undifferentiated emergency general surgical patient population.
Method: A prospective, multicentre observational cohort study of patients admitted with emergency surgical pathology was conducted in eight hospitals. BCA were performed at L3 vertebrae using computed tomography images to quantify sarcopenia and myosteatosis. Sex-specific BCA cut-off values were determined by our previous study. Reported Edmonton Frail Scale (REFS) values ≥8 identified frailty. The primary outcomes were all-cause 30-day and 1-year mortality. Multivariable logistic regression was utilised to explore predictive relationships between frailty, BCA, mortality and independent discharge.
Results: A total of 194 patients were included; 24% were frail, 25% were sarcopenic and 23% myosteatotic. Some 61% of patients underwent an emergency laparotomy. Frail patients were more likely to be sarcopenic (20.4% vs 40.4%; p = 0.011) and myosteatotic (27.2% vs 51.1%; p = 0.004). Thirty-day and 1-year mortality was 5.2% and 15.5%, respectively; 30-day mortality was two times higher in the frail group (4.1% vs 8.5%; p = 0.414), and three times higher at 1 year (10.2% vs 31.9%; p = 0.001). Age (odds ratio [OR] 1.06; p = 0.001), sarcopenia (OR 2.88; p = 0.047) and frailty (OR 4.13; p = 0.001) were associated with 1-year mortality. Only 55.3% of frail patients were discharged home independently compared with 88.4% non-frail patients (p < 0.001). One-year mortality was greater in those with frailty and/or BCA abnormalities than in those without (28.8% vs 9.6%; p = 0.003).
Conclusion: Frailty, sarcopenia and myosteatosis contribute significantly to adverse outcomes.
{"title":"Frailty and body composition predict adverse outcomes after emergency general surgery admission: a multicentre observational cohort study.","authors":"P May-Miller, Map Ligthart, A R Darbyshire, S Rahman, P H Pucher, N J Curtis, M A West","doi":"10.1308/rcsann.2024.0091","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1308/rcsann.2024.0091","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Emergency surgical admissions represent the most unwell patients admitted to any hospital. Frailty and body composition independently identify risk of adverse outcomes but are seldom combined to predict outcomes in emergency patients. We aim to determine the relationships between frailty, body composition analyses (BCA) and mortality in an undifferentiated emergency general surgical patient population.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>A prospective, multicentre observational cohort study of patients admitted with emergency surgical pathology was conducted in eight hospitals. BCA were performed at L3 vertebrae using computed tomography images to quantify sarcopenia and myosteatosis. Sex-specific BCA cut-off values were determined by our previous study. Reported Edmonton Frail Scale (REFS) values ≥8 identified frailty. The primary outcomes were all-cause 30-day and 1-year mortality. Multivariable logistic regression was utilised to explore predictive relationships between frailty, BCA, mortality and independent discharge.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 194 patients were included; 24% were frail, 25% were sarcopenic and 23% myosteatotic. Some 61% of patients underwent an emergency laparotomy. Frail patients were more likely to be sarcopenic (20.4% vs 40.4%; <i>p</i> = 0.011) and myosteatotic (27.2% vs 51.1%; <i>p</i> = 0.004). Thirty-day and 1-year mortality was 5.2% and 15.5%, respectively; 30-day mortality was two times higher in the frail group (4.1% vs 8.5%; <i>p</i> = 0.414), and three times higher at 1 year (10.2% vs 31.9%; <i>p</i> = 0.001). Age (odds ratio [OR] 1.06; <i>p</i> = 0.001), sarcopenia (OR 2.88; <i>p</i> = 0.047) and frailty (OR 4.13; <i>p</i> = 0.001) were associated with 1-year mortality. Only 55.3% of frail patients were discharged home independently compared with 88.4% non-frail patients (<i>p</i> < 0.001). One-year mortality was greater in those with frailty and/or BCA abnormalities than in those without (28.8% vs 9.6%; <i>p</i> = 0.003).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Frailty, sarcopenia and myosteatosis contribute significantly to adverse outcomes.</p><p><strong>Study registration: </strong>NCT03534765.</p>","PeriodicalId":8088,"journal":{"name":"Annals of the Royal College of Surgeons of England","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.1,"publicationDate":"2024-11-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142680674","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-11-15DOI: 10.1308/rcsann.2024.0095
A Ahmed, D Yang, M Eastwood, T Saunders, S F Ahsan
Introduction: Direct laryngoscopy and biopsy is the gold standard for obtaining a tissue diagnosis in patients with suspected laryngeal cancer. In patients with advanced disease or other medical comorbidities, this may come with significant anaesthetic risks, including tracheostomy. Ultrasonography-guided biopsy has been widely used in the diagnosis of malignancy involving cervical lymph nodes but it is not commonly employed in the diagnosis of laryngeal tumours. A systematic review was undertaken to assess the literature looking at whether ultrasonography-guided transcutaneous fine needle aspiration cytology (FNAC) is an adequate method in diagnosing laryngeal malignancy.
Methods: Two independent researchers conducted a systematic review of the literature using the MEDLINE® and Cochrane Library databases in accordance with the PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses) guidelines.
Results: A total of 568 studies were identified from the search, of which 3 met the inclusion criteria, resulting in 162 patient episodes. The pooled accuracy of transcutaneous FNAC in acquiring a sample adequate for histological diagnosis was 74.9%. Data on complications were limited, with a few cases of mild haemoptysis being recorded.
Conclusions: Transcutaneous FNAC can be considered a safe and quick method for establishing a histological diagnosis of laryngeal lesions, particularly in patients who may be severely comorbid, and it could therefore could reduce the risks of general anaesthesia and tracheostomy prior to commencing definitive treatment.
{"title":"A systematic review of ultrasonography-guided transcutaneous fine needle aspiration cytology in the diagnosis of laryngeal malignancy.","authors":"A Ahmed, D Yang, M Eastwood, T Saunders, S F Ahsan","doi":"10.1308/rcsann.2024.0095","DOIUrl":"10.1308/rcsann.2024.0095","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Direct laryngoscopy and biopsy is the gold standard for obtaining a tissue diagnosis in patients with suspected laryngeal cancer. In patients with advanced disease or other medical comorbidities, this may come with significant anaesthetic risks, including tracheostomy. Ultrasonography-guided biopsy has been widely used in the diagnosis of malignancy involving cervical lymph nodes but it is not commonly employed in the diagnosis of laryngeal tumours. A systematic review was undertaken to assess the literature looking at whether ultrasonography-guided transcutaneous fine needle aspiration cytology (FNAC) is an adequate method in diagnosing laryngeal malignancy.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Two independent researchers conducted a systematic review of the literature using the MEDLINE<sup>®</sup> and Cochrane Library databases in accordance with the PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses) guidelines.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 568 studies were identified from the search, of which 3 met the inclusion criteria, resulting in 162 patient episodes. The pooled accuracy of transcutaneous FNAC in acquiring a sample adequate for histological diagnosis was 74.9%. Data on complications were limited, with a few cases of mild haemoptysis being recorded.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Transcutaneous FNAC can be considered a safe and quick method for establishing a histological diagnosis of laryngeal lesions, particularly in patients who may be severely comorbid, and it could therefore could reduce the risks of general anaesthesia and tracheostomy prior to commencing definitive treatment.</p>","PeriodicalId":8088,"journal":{"name":"Annals of the Royal College of Surgeons of England","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.1,"publicationDate":"2024-11-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142613753","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-11-12DOI: 10.1308/rcsann.2024.0084
Mea Bakheet, M Hughes, N Darwish, S Chen, A Egun, M Banihani
Introduction: Peripheral arterial disease (PAD) involves atherosclerotic stenosis and occlusion of lower leg arteries, leading to significant disability, high cardiovascular and cerebrovascular morbidity and mortality. Critical limb ischemia (CLI) is the most severe form of PAD. With the UK's aging population set to increase, the prevalence of PAD and the burden on vascular teams are expected to rise. This study evaluates the impact of regular input from the Proactive Care of Older People Undergoing Surgery (POPS) team on vascular surgery outcomes.
Methods: This prospective cohort study examined the impact of Care of the Elderly (CoE) input on predefined parameters, focussing primarily on the length of stay (LoS) over 12 months. Data included baseline demographics, comorbidities, frailty scores (assessed using the Rockwood frailty score), LoS and referrals to medical specialties. A retrospective pilot study of 50 consecutive patients indicated a need for CoE input, showing higher local LoS compared with the national average.
Results: Patients in both pilot and project groups were matched for comorbidities, frailty scores and interventions. Despite higher mean age and a greater proportion of patients aged 75+ years in the project group, the study aimed to reduce LoS. Post-quality improvement project implementation, LoS beyond fit-for-discharge decreased from 11.7 days to 9 days in 6 months and to 6 days after 12 months. Referrals to medical specialties decreased from 77% to 40%, and new diagnoses on discharge increased from 28% to 37%.
Conclusions: CoE team input in vascular surgery patient care significantly improved outcomes, reducing LoS and medical specialty referrals, demonstrating cost-effectiveness and suggesting a feasible multidisciplinary approach for other regions.
导言:外周动脉疾病(PAD)是指小腿动脉粥样硬化性狭窄和闭塞,可导致严重残疾、心脑血管疾病的高发病率和死亡率。重度肢体缺血(CLI)是 PAD 最严重的形式。随着英国老龄化人口的增加,PAD 的发病率和血管团队的负担预计也会增加。本研究评估了接受手术的老年人积极护理(POPS)团队定期投入对血管手术效果的影响:这项前瞻性队列研究考察了老年人护理(CoE)投入对预定参数的影响,主要侧重于 12 个月的住院时间(LoS)。数据包括基线人口统计学、合并症、虚弱评分(使用洛克伍德虚弱评分进行评估)、住院时间和转诊到专科的情况。对 50 名连续患者进行的回顾性试点研究表明,与全国平均水平相比,当地的 LoS 较高,因此需要 CoE 的投入:试点组和项目组的患者在合并症、虚弱评分和干预措施方面都是匹配的。尽管项目组患者的平均年龄更高,75 岁以上患者的比例更大,但该研究的目标是降低 LoS。质量改进项目实施后,6 个月内适合出院的 LoS 从 11.7 天降至 9 天,12 个月后降至 6 天。医疗专科转诊率从77%降至40%,出院时新诊断率从28%增至37%:CoE团队在血管外科患者护理中的投入大大改善了疗效,减少了LoS和医疗专科转诊,证明了成本效益,并为其他地区提供了一种可行的多学科方法。
{"title":"Enhancing vascular surgery outcomes through geriatric co-management: a study on the impact of the POPS team.","authors":"Mea Bakheet, M Hughes, N Darwish, S Chen, A Egun, M Banihani","doi":"10.1308/rcsann.2024.0084","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1308/rcsann.2024.0084","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Peripheral arterial disease (PAD) involves atherosclerotic stenosis and occlusion of lower leg arteries, leading to significant disability, high cardiovascular and cerebrovascular morbidity and mortality. Critical limb ischemia (CLI) is the most severe form of PAD. With the UK's aging population set to increase, the prevalence of PAD and the burden on vascular teams are expected to rise. This study evaluates the impact of regular input from the Proactive Care of Older People Undergoing Surgery (POPS) team on vascular surgery outcomes.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This prospective cohort study examined the impact of Care of the Elderly (CoE) input on predefined parameters, focussing primarily on the length of stay (LoS) over 12 months. Data included baseline demographics, comorbidities, frailty scores (assessed using the Rockwood frailty score), LoS and referrals to medical specialties. A retrospective pilot study of 50 consecutive patients indicated a need for CoE input, showing higher local LoS compared with the national average.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Patients in both pilot and project groups were matched for comorbidities, frailty scores and interventions. Despite higher mean age and a greater proportion of patients aged 75+ years in the project group, the study aimed to reduce LoS. Post-quality improvement project implementation, LoS beyond fit-for-discharge decreased from 11.7 days to 9 days in 6 months and to 6 days after 12 months. Referrals to medical specialties decreased from 77% to 40%, and new diagnoses on discharge increased from 28% to 37%.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>CoE team input in vascular surgery patient care significantly improved outcomes, reducing LoS and medical specialty referrals, demonstrating cost-effectiveness and suggesting a feasible multidisciplinary approach for other regions.</p>","PeriodicalId":8088,"journal":{"name":"Annals of the Royal College of Surgeons of England","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.1,"publicationDate":"2024-11-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142613756","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-11-12DOI: 10.1308/rcsann.2024.0072
F A Chiumenti, A L Pendolino, F M Vaz, R C Dwivedi
Introduction: The 2-week wait (2ww) referral pathway has been introduced into UK clinical practice to increase the early detection of cancer and improve survivals. The efficiency of this system for head and neck (H&N) cancers has been questioned over the years because of evidence of low pick-up rates. H&N cancers present with a wide variety of non-specific symptoms, particularly throat and voice symptoms. These symptoms need to be accurately interpreted together with risk factors if they are to be addressed adequately and overload of cancer facilities avoided. One of the most common outcomes of H&N 2ww referrals is laryngopharyngeal reflux (LPR), a common condition that could be diagnosed and managed in the primary care setting with a prescription of proton pump inhibitors (PPI) trials.
Methods: We retrospectively analysed a cohort of consecutive patients referred on the 2ww pathway for throat and voice symptoms at University College London Hospital H&N cancer clinic during two months in 2019.
Results: A total of 101 patients (43.6% men, mean age 53.3 years) were included. Throat and voice symptoms were described as intermittent in 52.5% and non-lateralised in 88.1%. Diagnosis of LPR was made in 59.4% of the referrals. A PPI trial was prescribed by general practitioners (GPs) in only 7.9% of cases. The cancer pick-up rate in our cohort is 2.9%.
Conclusions: An improved awareness of the symptoms of LPR could guide GPs to prescribe trials of PPIs in low-risk patients before rushing into a referral on a cancer pathway. This would improve the 2ww process on many levels, reduce the burden on the National Health Service and avoid patients' psychological distress.
{"title":"The 2-week wait pathway for suspected head and neck cancers in patients with throat and voice symptoms: referral patterns, common clinical practice and diagnostic efficacy of NICE guidelines.","authors":"F A Chiumenti, A L Pendolino, F M Vaz, R C Dwivedi","doi":"10.1308/rcsann.2024.0072","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1308/rcsann.2024.0072","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>The 2-week wait (2ww) referral pathway has been introduced into UK clinical practice to increase the early detection of cancer and improve survivals. The efficiency of this system for head and neck (H&N) cancers has been questioned over the years because of evidence of low pick-up rates. H&N cancers present with a wide variety of non-specific symptoms, particularly throat and voice symptoms. These symptoms need to be accurately interpreted together with risk factors if they are to be addressed adequately and overload of cancer facilities avoided. One of the most common outcomes of H&N 2ww referrals is laryngopharyngeal reflux (LPR), a common condition that could be diagnosed and managed in the primary care setting with a prescription of proton pump inhibitors (PPI) trials.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We retrospectively analysed a cohort of consecutive patients referred on the 2ww pathway for throat and voice symptoms at University College London Hospital H&N cancer clinic during two months in 2019.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 101 patients (43.6% men, mean age 53.3 years) were included. Throat and voice symptoms were described as intermittent in 52.5% and non-lateralised in 88.1%. Diagnosis of LPR was made in 59.4% of the referrals. A PPI trial was prescribed by general practitioners (GPs) in only 7.9% of cases. The cancer pick-up rate in our cohort is 2.9%.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>An improved awareness of the symptoms of LPR could guide GPs to prescribe trials of PPIs in low-risk patients before rushing into a referral on a cancer pathway. This would improve the 2ww process on many levels, reduce the burden on the National Health Service and avoid patients' psychological distress.</p>","PeriodicalId":8088,"journal":{"name":"Annals of the Royal College of Surgeons of England","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.1,"publicationDate":"2024-11-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142613763","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-11-01DOI: 10.1308/rcsann.2024.0102
B Rogers
{"title":"Innovation and the publishing gambit.","authors":"B Rogers","doi":"10.1308/rcsann.2024.0102","DOIUrl":"10.1308/rcsann.2024.0102","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":8088,"journal":{"name":"Annals of the Royal College of Surgeons of England","volume":"106 8","pages":"657"},"PeriodicalIF":1.1,"publicationDate":"2024-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11528353/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142557048","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-11-01Epub Date: 2024-05-24DOI: 10.1308/rcsann.2024.0028
D C Schramm, A Abdul-Hamid, J Ramsden, R Mathew
Introduction: Medical students often hesitate to enter the operating theatre because of poor visibility of the surgical field and anxiety about the theatre environment. In addition, ear, nose and throat (ENT) surgery is underrepresented in many medical curricula. Virtual systems like Proximie offer flexible viewing of surgeries with surgeon commentary, potentially addressing these issues.
Methods: This descriptive survey study aimed to evaluate the use of Proximie as a surgical education tool for delivering ENT teaching to medical students. Live ENT procedures were recorded at the ENT Department of the John Radcliffe Hospital and shared with interested clinical medical students through Proximie accounts. Students were added to a private group chat to ask questions and provided feedback through structured forms, assessing procedural effectiveness and the platform's technology. Live-streaming and recording of procedures were facilitated by ENT surgeons providing commentary.
Results: Conducted over four virtual theatre days, the study gathered 52 responses: 96% of students rated Proximie's educational value as 4 of 5 or higher; 57% preferred the virtual experience over physical attendance because of its convenience and the improved view of the surgical field. Students valued the live commentary and showed interest in using Proximie for a broader range of surgeries. Suggested improvements included fixing technical issues, better communication of theatre lists, and expanding surgical specialty coverage.
Conclusions: Proximie has been highly rated by medical students for its effective and engaging approach in the instruction of surgical skills, underscoring its value as an educational tool. Future research is needed to formally assess knowledge acquisition and retention across multiple surgical subspecialties. This work is the first step towards evaluating the utility of virtual operating theatre platforms for medical student education.
{"title":"Proximie in the operating theatre: evaluation of a virtual operating platform for medical student education.","authors":"D C Schramm, A Abdul-Hamid, J Ramsden, R Mathew","doi":"10.1308/rcsann.2024.0028","DOIUrl":"10.1308/rcsann.2024.0028","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Medical students often hesitate to enter the operating theatre because of poor visibility of the surgical field and anxiety about the theatre environment. In addition, ear, nose and throat (ENT) surgery is underrepresented in many medical curricula. Virtual systems like Proximie offer flexible viewing of surgeries with surgeon commentary, potentially addressing these issues.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This descriptive survey study aimed to evaluate the use of Proximie as a surgical education tool for delivering ENT teaching to medical students. Live ENT procedures were recorded at the ENT Department of the John Radcliffe Hospital and shared with interested clinical medical students through Proximie accounts. Students were added to a private group chat to ask questions and provided feedback through structured forms, assessing procedural effectiveness and the platform's technology. Live-streaming and recording of procedures were facilitated by ENT surgeons providing commentary.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Conducted over four virtual theatre days, the study gathered 52 responses: 96% of students rated Proximie's educational value as 4 of 5 or higher; 57% preferred the virtual experience over physical attendance because of its convenience and the improved view of the surgical field. Students valued the live commentary and showed interest in using Proximie for a broader range of surgeries. Suggested improvements included fixing technical issues, better communication of theatre lists, and expanding surgical specialty coverage.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Proximie has been highly rated by medical students for its effective and engaging approach in the instruction of surgical skills, underscoring its value as an educational tool. Future research is needed to formally assess knowledge acquisition and retention across multiple surgical subspecialties. This work is the first step towards evaluating the utility of virtual operating theatre platforms for medical student education.</p>","PeriodicalId":8088,"journal":{"name":"Annals of the Royal College of Surgeons of England","volume":" ","pages":"705-710"},"PeriodicalIF":1.1,"publicationDate":"2024-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11528351/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141086472","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-11-01DOI: 10.1308/rcsann.2024.0103
{"title":"Debate on: Laparoscopic cholecystectomy performed by a surgical care practitioner: a review of outcomes by Odogwu <i>et al</i>.","authors":"","doi":"10.1308/rcsann.2024.0103","DOIUrl":"10.1308/rcsann.2024.0103","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":8088,"journal":{"name":"Annals of the Royal College of Surgeons of England","volume":"106 8","pages":"740-743"},"PeriodicalIF":1.1,"publicationDate":"2024-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11536781/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142557047","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-11-01Epub Date: 2024-02-20DOI: 10.1308/rcsann.2022.0078
S Chien, Ghl Miller, I Huang, D A Cunningham, D Carson, L S Gall, K S Khan
Introduction: Websites and online resources are increasingly becoming patients' main source of healthcare information. It is paramount that high quality information is available online to enhance patient education and improve clinical outcomes. Upper gastrointestinal (UGI) endoscopy is the gold standard investigation for UGI symptoms and yet little is known regarding the quality of patient orientated websites. The aim of this study was to assess the quality of online patient information on UGI endoscopy using the modified Ensuring Quality Information for Patients (EQIP) tool.
Methods: Ten search terms were employed to conduct a systematic review. for each term, the top 100 websites identified via a Google search were assessed using the modified EQIP tool. High scoring websites underwent further analysis. Websites intended for professional use by clinicians as well as those containing video or marketing content were excluded.
Findings: A total of 378 websites were eligible for analysis. The median modified EQIP score for UGI endoscopy was 18/36 (interquartile range: 14-21). The median EQIP scores for the content, identification and structure domains were 8/18, 1/6 and 9/12 respectively. Higher modified EQIP scores were obtained for websites produced by government departments and National Health Service hospitals (p=0.007). Complication rates were documented in only a fifth (20.4%) of websites. High scoring websites were significantly more likely to provide balanced information on risks and benefits (94.6% vs 34.4%, p<0.001).
Conclusions: There is an immediate need to improve the quality of online patient information regarding UGI endoscopy. The currently available resources provide minimal information on the risks associated with the procedure, potentially hindering patients' ability to make informed healthcare decisions.
{"title":"Quality assessment of online patient information on upper gastrointestinal endoscopy using the modified Ensuring Quality Information for Patients tool.","authors":"S Chien, Ghl Miller, I Huang, D A Cunningham, D Carson, L S Gall, K S Khan","doi":"10.1308/rcsann.2022.0078","DOIUrl":"10.1308/rcsann.2022.0078","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Websites and online resources are increasingly becoming patients' main source of healthcare information. It is paramount that high quality information is available online to enhance patient education and improve clinical outcomes. Upper gastrointestinal (UGI) endoscopy is the gold standard investigation for UGI symptoms and yet little is known regarding the quality of patient orientated websites. The aim of this study was to assess the quality of online patient information on UGI endoscopy using the modified Ensuring Quality Information for Patients (EQIP) tool.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Ten search terms were employed to conduct a systematic review. for each term, the top 100 websites identified via a Google search were assessed using the modified EQIP tool. High scoring websites underwent further analysis. Websites intended for professional use by clinicians as well as those containing video or marketing content were excluded.</p><p><strong>Findings: </strong>A total of 378 websites were eligible for analysis. The median modified EQIP score for UGI endoscopy was 18/36 (interquartile range: 14-21). The median EQIP scores for the content, identification and structure domains were 8/18, 1/6 and 9/12 respectively. Higher modified EQIP scores were obtained for websites produced by government departments and National Health Service hospitals (<i>p</i>=0.007). Complication rates were documented in only a fifth (20.4%) of websites. High scoring websites were significantly more likely to provide balanced information on risks and benefits (94.6% vs 34.4%, <i>p</i><0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>There is an immediate need to improve the quality of online patient information regarding UGI endoscopy. The currently available resources provide minimal information on the risks associated with the procedure, potentially hindering patients' ability to make informed healthcare decisions.</p>","PeriodicalId":8088,"journal":{"name":"Annals of the Royal College of Surgeons of England","volume":" ","pages":"672-681"},"PeriodicalIF":1.1,"publicationDate":"2024-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11528370/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"139904866","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}