首页 > 最新文献

Annals of the Royal College of Surgeons of England最新文献

英文 中文
Colon cancer survival in the elderly without curative surgery. 未接受根治性手术的老年人结肠癌存活率。
IF 1.1 4区 医学 Q3 SURGERY Pub Date : 2024-09-01 Epub Date: 2024-02-26 DOI: 10.1308/rcsann.2023.0059
J Franklyn, A Poole, I Lindsey

Introduction: The aim of this study was to chart the natural history of elderly patients with colon cancer who are managed nonoperatively, with the primary outcome being life expectancy from diagnosis to death.

Methods: This was a retrospective analysis of patients aged 80 years and above diagnosed with colon cancer in a tertiary care referral hospital in England between 1 January 2012 and 31 December 2017.

Results: Thirty-two patients were diagnosed with non-metastatic colon cancer and managed non-operatively. The median age of patients in this study was 86 years. The group had a median Charlson Comorbidity Index of 7 (range 6-12) and the median frailty score was 6 (range 3-8). Progression to metastatic disease was identified in two patients; two further patients showed locoregional progression of cancer and therefore required palliative surgical intervention. Survival of these patients ranged from 105 to 1,782 days with a median life expectancy of 586 days. Place of death was identified in 15/31 patients: 4 (27%) died in hospital, 12 (38%) died at home and 15 (47%) died in a nursing or residential home; data were missing for 1 patient (3%).

Conclusions: Nonoperative management of elderly patients with colon cancer yields reasonable life expectancy and a low risk of life-threatening local complications.

简介:本研究的目的是记录接受非手术治疗的老年结肠癌患者的自然病史,主要结果是患者从确诊到死亡的预期寿命:本研究的目的是记录接受非手术治疗的老年结肠癌患者的自然病史,主要结果是患者从确诊到死亡的预期寿命:这是一项回顾性分析,研究对象是2012年1月1日至2017年12月31日期间在英国一家三级医疗转诊医院确诊的80岁及以上结肠癌患者:32名患者被诊断为非转移性结肠癌,并接受了非手术治疗。本研究中患者的中位年龄为 86 岁。该组患者的夏尔森合并症指数中位数为 7(范围 6-12),虚弱评分中位数为 6(范围 3-8)。有两名患者的病情发展为转移性疾病;另有两名患者的癌症出现局部进展,因此需要姑息性手术干预。这些患者的生存期从 105 天到 1782 天不等,中位预期寿命为 586 天。15/31 例患者的死亡地点已经确定:4人(27%)死于医院,12人(38%)死于家中,15人(47%)死于疗养院或养老院;1人(3%)数据缺失:结论:对老年结肠癌患者进行非手术治疗可获得合理的预期寿命,且出现危及生命的局部并发症的风险较低。
{"title":"Colon cancer survival in the elderly without curative surgery.","authors":"J Franklyn, A Poole, I Lindsey","doi":"10.1308/rcsann.2023.0059","DOIUrl":"10.1308/rcsann.2023.0059","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>The aim of this study was to chart the natural history of elderly patients with colon cancer who are managed nonoperatively, with the primary outcome being life expectancy from diagnosis to death.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This was a retrospective analysis of patients aged 80 years and above diagnosed with colon cancer in a tertiary care referral hospital in England between 1 January 2012 and 31 December 2017.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Thirty-two patients were diagnosed with non-metastatic colon cancer and managed non-operatively. The median age of patients in this study was 86 years. The group had a median Charlson Comorbidity Index of 7 (range 6-12) and the median frailty score was 6 (range 3-8). Progression to metastatic disease was identified in two patients; two further patients showed locoregional progression of cancer and therefore required palliative surgical intervention. Survival of these patients ranged from 105 to 1,782 days with a median life expectancy of 586 days. Place of death was identified in 15/31 patients: 4 (27%) died in hospital, 12 (38%) died at home and 15 (47%) died in a nursing or residential home; data were missing for 1 patient (3%).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Nonoperative management of elderly patients with colon cancer yields reasonable life expectancy and a low risk of life-threatening local complications.</p>","PeriodicalId":8088,"journal":{"name":"Annals of the Royal College of Surgeons of England","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.1,"publicationDate":"2024-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11365724/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"139970812","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Surgery for phaeochromocytomas and paragangliomas: Current practice in the United Kingdom. phaeochromocytomas 和 paragangliomas 的手术治疗:英国的当前实践。
IF 1.1 4区 医学 Q3 SURGERY Pub Date : 2024-09-01 Epub Date: 2024-02-16 DOI: 10.1308/rcsann.2023.0054
A Bojoga, S P Balasubramanian, R Mihai

Introduction: There is wide variability in the perioperative management of phaeochromocytoma and paraganglioma (PPGL) in different centres. This study aimed to summarise the management of PPGLs as reported in the United Kingdom Registry for Endocrine and Thyroid Surgery (UKRETS) database and to determine current perioperative management of PPGLs by surveying UK clinicians.

Methods: Data recorded on UKRETS from 2005 to 2021 were subjected to descriptive analyses. British Association of Endocrine and Thyroid Surgeons members were invited to participate in an open survey relating to the perioperative management of patients with PPGLs.

Results: A total of 2,007 operations for PPGL from 49 participating centres were included. The median annual workload in each centre was four cases. Operations were performed predominantly laparoscopically (69%). The median length of stay (4 days) was the same in groups of surgeons stratified by volume. The survey had 29 respondents from 22 centres across the UK, and a formal protocol for perioperative management exists in 48% of the centres. Phenoxybenzamine (72%) was preferred for alpha-blockade. The practice of admitting patients for optimisation from 1 to 7 days before the day of surgery was common (62%). Central venous pressure and blood glucose monitoring were mentioned as routine intraoperative adjuncts by 72% of the responders.

Conclusions: There is significant variation in the workload and perioperative management of PPGLs in the UK. This is potentially detrimental to patient outcomes and a consensus document might be beneficial to harmonise practice across the UK.

导言:不同中心对嗜铬细胞瘤和副神经节瘤(PPGL)的围术期管理存在很大差异。本研究旨在总结英国内分泌和甲状腺手术登记(UKRETS)数据库中报告的PPGL管理情况,并通过调查英国临床医生来确定当前的PPGL围手术期管理情况:方法:对2005年至2021年UKRETS记录的数据进行描述性分析。英国内分泌和甲状腺外科医生协会会员应邀参加了一项有关PPGLs患者围手术期管理的公开调查:49个参与中心共进行了2,007例PPGL手术。每个中心的年工作量中位数为四例。手术主要通过腹腔镜进行(69%)。按工作量分层的外科医生组别,住院时间中位数(4 天)相同。这项调查有来自英国 22 个中心的 29 位受访者参与,48% 的中心制定了正式的围手术期管理方案。α-受体阻滞剂首选苯氧苄胺(72%)。让患者在手术前 1 到 7 天接受优化治疗的做法很普遍(62%)。72%的答复者提到,中心静脉压和血糖监测是术中常规辅助手段:结论:在英国,PPGL 的工作量和围手术期管理存在很大差异。结论: 在英国,PPGLs 的工作量和围手术期管理存在很大差异,这可能会对患者的预后造成不利影响,因此制定一份共识文件可能有利于协调英国各地的做法。
{"title":"Surgery for phaeochromocytomas and paragangliomas: Current practice in the United Kingdom.","authors":"A Bojoga, S P Balasubramanian, R Mihai","doi":"10.1308/rcsann.2023.0054","DOIUrl":"10.1308/rcsann.2023.0054","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>There is wide variability in the perioperative management of phaeochromocytoma and paraganglioma (PPGL) in different centres. This study aimed to summarise the management of PPGLs as reported in the United Kingdom Registry for Endocrine and Thyroid Surgery (UKRETS) database and to determine current perioperative management of PPGLs by surveying UK clinicians.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Data recorded on UKRETS from 2005 to 2021 were subjected to descriptive analyses. British Association of Endocrine and Thyroid Surgeons members were invited to participate in an open survey relating to the perioperative management of patients with PPGLs.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 2,007 operations for PPGL from 49 participating centres were included. The median annual workload in each centre was four cases. Operations were performed predominantly laparoscopically (69%). The median length of stay (4 days) was the same in groups of surgeons stratified by volume. The survey had 29 respondents from 22 centres across the UK, and a formal protocol for perioperative management exists in 48% of the centres. Phenoxybenzamine (72%) was preferred for alpha-blockade. The practice of admitting patients for optimisation from 1 to 7 days before the day of surgery was common (62%). Central venous pressure and blood glucose monitoring were mentioned as routine intraoperative adjuncts by 72% of the responders.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>There is significant variation in the workload and perioperative management of PPGLs in the UK. This is potentially detrimental to patient outcomes and a consensus document might be beneficial to harmonise practice across the UK.</p>","PeriodicalId":8088,"journal":{"name":"Annals of the Royal College of Surgeons of England","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.1,"publicationDate":"2024-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11365732/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"139740233","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Combined positron emission tomography and contrast enhanced CT (PET/CeCT) is a feasible single investigation in the staging of oesophagogastric cancers: single-centre pilot study experience during the COVID-19 pandemic. 联合正电子发射断层扫描和增强CT (PET/CeCT)是一种可行的食管胃癌分期的单一研究:2019冠状病毒病大流行期间的单中心试点研究经验。
IF 1.1 4区 医学 Q3 SURGERY Pub Date : 2024-09-01 Epub Date: 2023-11-20 DOI: 10.1308/rcsann.2023.0070
M Jones, S Higgs, S Dwerryhouse, V Markos, K Mason, C Green, A Nawwar, J Searle, I Lyburn

Introduction: Staging of oesophagogastric (OG) cancers usually involves endoscopy (OGD), and separate visits for contrast enhanced computed tomography (CeCT) and positron emission tomography (PET/CT). At the height of the COVID-19 pandemic, some of our patients underwent single-visit combined staging with PET/CeCT. We compare this novel pathway with standard separate imaging in time to completion of staging, to start of treatment, and cost.

Methods: We identified all patients discussed at our OG multidisciplinary team (MDT) meeting in 2020. Clinical records revealed dates of investigations and treatments. Data were tabulated in Excel, with statistical analysis in SPSS. All patients followed the same MDT process and image reviewing criteria. Costs were compared using prices supplied by finance departments.

Results: A total of 211 new patients were discussed at our MDT in 2020. Of these, 48 patients had combined PET/CeCT staging, and 68 had separate scans. Median time (interquartile range) in days from OGD to final imaging was 9 (6-23) for the combined group versus 21 (16-28) for the separate group (p≤0.001). Median time (days) from OGD to treatment start was 37 (29-52) for combined versus 55 (40-71) for separate (p≤0.001). No combined scans were of insufficient diagnostic quality for the MDT. PET/CeCT had a potential cost saving of £113 per patient.

Conclusions: PET/CeCT allows accurate radiological staging of OG cancers with a single scan. Patients completed staging and started treatment faster, with a potential saving of £10,509 in one year. PET/CeCT has become standard staging at our trust, and we aim to incorporate radiotherapy planning images too.

导读:食管胃(OG)癌的分期通常包括内镜检查(OGD),并分别进行对比增强计算机断层扫描(CeCT)和正电子发射断层扫描(PET/CT)。在COVID-19大流行高峰期,我们的一些患者接受了单次就诊合并PET/CeCT分期。我们在完成分期、开始治疗和费用方面将这种新途径与标准的单独成像进行比较。方法:我们确定了2020年OG多学科团队(MDT)会议上讨论的所有患者。临床记录显示了调查和治疗的日期。数据用Excel表格制作,SPSS软件进行统计分析。所有患者均遵循相同的MDT流程和图像审查标准。成本采用财务部门提供的价格进行比较。结果:2020年我们的MDT共讨论了211例新患者。其中,48名患者进行了PET/CeCT联合分期,68名患者进行了单独扫描。联合组从OGD到最终成像的中位时间(四分位间距)为9天(6-23天),而单独组为21天(16-28天)(p≤0.001)。联合组从OGD到治疗开始的中位时间(天)为37(29-52),单独组为55 (40-71)(p≤0.001)。没有联合扫描对MDT的诊断质量不足。PET/CeCT可以为每位患者节省113英镑的潜在费用。结论:PET/CeCT可以通过单次扫描对OG癌进行准确的放射分期。患者更快地完成分期并开始治疗,一年内可能节省10,509英镑。PET/CeCT已成为我们信任的标准分期,我们的目标也是纳入放疗计划图像。
{"title":"Combined positron emission tomography and contrast enhanced CT (PET/CeCT) is a feasible single investigation in the staging of oesophagogastric cancers: single-centre pilot study experience during the COVID-19 pandemic.","authors":"M Jones, S Higgs, S Dwerryhouse, V Markos, K Mason, C Green, A Nawwar, J Searle, I Lyburn","doi":"10.1308/rcsann.2023.0070","DOIUrl":"10.1308/rcsann.2023.0070","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Staging of oesophagogastric (OG) cancers usually involves endoscopy (OGD), and separate visits for contrast enhanced computed tomography (CeCT) and positron emission tomography (PET/CT). At the height of the COVID-19 pandemic, some of our patients underwent single-visit combined staging with PET/CeCT. We compare this novel pathway with standard separate imaging in time to completion of staging, to start of treatment, and cost.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We identified all patients discussed at our OG multidisciplinary team (MDT) meeting in 2020. Clinical records revealed dates of investigations and treatments. Data were tabulated in Excel, with statistical analysis in SPSS. All patients followed the same MDT process and image reviewing criteria. Costs were compared using prices supplied by finance departments.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 211 new patients were discussed at our MDT in 2020. Of these, 48 patients had combined PET/CeCT staging, and 68 had separate scans. Median time (interquartile range) in days from OGD to final imaging was 9 (6-23) for the combined group versus 21 (16-28) for the separate group (<i>p</i>≤0.001). Median time (days) from OGD to treatment start was 37 (29-52) for combined versus 55 (40-71) for separate (<i>p</i>≤0.001). No combined scans were of insufficient diagnostic quality for the MDT. PET/CeCT had a potential cost saving of £113 per patient.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>PET/CeCT allows accurate radiological staging of OG cancers with a single scan. Patients completed staging and started treatment faster, with a potential saving of £10,509 in one year. PET/CeCT has become standard staging at our trust, and we aim to incorporate radiotherapy planning images too.</p>","PeriodicalId":8088,"journal":{"name":"Annals of the Royal College of Surgeons of England","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.1,"publicationDate":"2024-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11365727/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"138046059","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Evaluation of a pilot of a community virtual triage for breast symptoms outside of usual primary or secondary care pathways. 在常规初级或二级护理路径之外,对社区乳腺症状虚拟分诊试点进行评估。
IF 1.1 4区 医学 Q3 SURGERY Pub Date : 2024-09-01 Epub Date: 2024-02-26 DOI: 10.1308/rcsann.2023.0094
S Laws, K Spiller, C Glew

Both primary and secondary care services in the NHS have been overwhelmed with an increase in referrals on the suspected cancer pathways. The years 2020/2021 saw 551,770 symptomatic breast referrals made in England alone. The Wessex Rapid investigations service in conjunction with the local district general hospital and primary care networks instigated a virtual triage for new breast symptoms. Over the course of a year, 664 people were assessed by either telephone or video using specially trained nurses. Appointments were given within 1-2 working days. The service was highly valued by patients and general practitioners. We were unable to confirm a reduction in referral to secondary care as the evaluation occurred during a postpandemic peak in referrals. We found that 10% of patients with new breast symptoms can safely self-manage. This percentage varied with the experience of the triage clinician. A specialist community face-to-face service could reduce further the need for full secondary care evaluation. Better integration and use of information technology systems would improve the service. The rapid responsiveness and length of consultations is valued by patients. Representation with the same symptoms was rare. This pathway utilises staff outside of the usual primary and secondary care providers and thus reduces the pressure on stretched systems.

随着疑似癌症转诊病例的增加,国家医疗服务体系中的初级和二级医疗服务已不堪重负。2020/2021 年,仅英格兰就有 551,770 例无症状乳腺转诊。威塞克斯快速调查服务与当地的地区综合医院和初级保健网络合作,对新出现的乳腺症状进行了虚拟分流。在一年的时间里,经过专门培训的护士通过电话或视频对 664 人进行了评估。预约在 1-2 个工作日内完成。这项服务受到了患者和全科医生的高度评价。由于评估是在疫后转诊高峰期进行的,因此我们无法证实转诊到二级医疗机构的人数有所减少。我们发现,10% 的新乳腺症状患者可以安全地进行自我管理。这一比例随着分诊医生经验的不同而变化。专业的社区面对面服务可以进一步减少对二级医疗机构全面评估的需求。更好地整合和使用信息技术系统将改善服务。患者对快速反应和就诊时间非常重视。出现相同症状的情况很少见。该路径利用了常规初级和二级医疗服务提供者以外的人员,从而减轻了对紧张系统的压力。
{"title":"Evaluation of a pilot of a community virtual triage for breast symptoms outside of usual primary or secondary care pathways.","authors":"S Laws, K Spiller, C Glew","doi":"10.1308/rcsann.2023.0094","DOIUrl":"10.1308/rcsann.2023.0094","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Both primary and secondary care services in the NHS have been overwhelmed with an increase in referrals on the suspected cancer pathways. The years 2020/2021 saw 551,770 symptomatic breast referrals made in England alone. The Wessex Rapid investigations service in conjunction with the local district general hospital and primary care networks instigated a virtual triage for new breast symptoms. Over the course of a year, 664 people were assessed by either telephone or video using specially trained nurses. Appointments were given within 1-2 working days. The service was highly valued by patients and general practitioners. We were unable to confirm a reduction in referral to secondary care as the evaluation occurred during a postpandemic peak in referrals. We found that 10% of patients with new breast symptoms can safely self-manage. This percentage varied with the experience of the triage clinician. A specialist community face-to-face service could reduce further the need for full secondary care evaluation. Better integration and use of information technology systems would improve the service. The rapid responsiveness and length of consultations is valued by patients. Representation with the same symptoms was rare. This pathway utilises staff outside of the usual primary and secondary care providers and thus reduces the pressure on stretched systems.</p>","PeriodicalId":8088,"journal":{"name":"Annals of the Royal College of Surgeons of England","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.1,"publicationDate":"2024-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11365731/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"139970813","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Paradigm shift towards emergency cholecystectomy: one site experience of the Chole-QuiC process. 急诊胆囊切除术的范式转变:Chole-QuiC过程的一个部位经验。
IF 1.1 4区 医学 Q3 SURGERY Pub Date : 2024-09-01 Epub Date: 2023-12-01 DOI: 10.1308/rcsann.2023.0084
M Hamid, J Bird, J Yeo, A Shrestha, M Carter, K Kudhail, A Akingboye, C Sellahewa

Introduction: Substantial evidence exists for the superiority of emergency over delayed cholecystectomy for gallstone disease during primary admission. Despite this, emergency surgery rates in the UK remain low compared with other developed countries, with great variation in care across the nation. We aimed to describe the local paradigm shift towards emergency surgery and investigate outcomes.

Methods: This is a prospective observational study examining patients enrolled onto an emergency cholecystectomy pathway, following the hospital's subscription to the Royal College of Surgeons of England's Cholecystectomy Quality Improvement Collaborative (Chole-QuIC), between 1 December 2021 and 31 January 2023. Multivariate logistical regression models were used to identify patient and hospital factors associated with postoperative outcomes.

Results: Of the 307 suitable acute admissions, 261 (85%) had an emergency cholecystectomy, compared with 5% preceding the Chole-QuIC interventions. Waiting time dropped from 67 to 5 days. A total of 208 (79.7%) patients were primary presentations, 92 (35.2%) were classed Tokyo grade 2 and 142 (54.4%) were obese. A total of 23 (8.8%) patients underwent preoperative endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography, and 26 (10%) patients had a subtotal cholecystectomy. Favourable outcomes (Clavien Dindo ≥3) were observed in first presentations (odds ratio (OR) 0.35; p=0.042) and for operation times within 7 days (OR 0.32; p=0.037), with worse outcomes in BMI ≥35 (OR 3.32; p=0.005) and operation time >7 days (OR 3.11; p=0.037).

Conclusion: A paradigm shift towards emergency cholecystectomy benefits both the patient and the service. Positive outcomes are apparent for early operation in patients presenting for the first time and recurrent attendees, with early operation (<7 days) providing the most favourable outcome in a select patient group.

导言:有大量证据表明,在初次入院时,急诊优于延迟胆囊切除术。尽管如此,与其他发达国家相比,英国的急诊手术率仍然很低,全国各地的护理差异很大。我们的目的是描述当地向急诊手术的范式转变并调查结果。方法:这是一项前瞻性观察性研究,在医院于2021年12月1日至2023年1月31日期间订阅英国皇家外科学院胆囊切除术质量改善协作(Chole-QuIC)后,对入组急诊胆囊切除术途径的患者进行检查。多变量逻辑回归模型用于确定与术后结果相关的患者和医院因素。结果:在307例合适的急性入院患者中,261例(85%)进行了紧急胆囊切除术,而在进行Chole-QuIC干预之前,这一比例为5%。等待时间由67天缩短至5天。共有208例(79.7%)患者为原发性症状,92例(35.2%)为东京2级,142例(54.4%)为肥胖。共有23例(8.8%)患者术前行内镜逆行胆管造影,26例(10%)患者行胆囊次全切除术。首次就诊时观察到良好的结果(Clavien Dindo≥3)(优势比(OR) 0.35;p=0.042),手术时间在7天内(OR 0.32;p=0.037), BMI≥35者预后较差(OR 3.32;p=0.005),手术时间>7天(OR 3.11;p = 0.037)。结论:急诊胆囊切除术的模式转变对患者和服务都有利。对于首次就诊和复发的患者,早期手术效果明显,早期手术(
{"title":"Paradigm shift towards emergency cholecystectomy: one site experience of the Chole-QuiC process.","authors":"M Hamid, J Bird, J Yeo, A Shrestha, M Carter, K Kudhail, A Akingboye, C Sellahewa","doi":"10.1308/rcsann.2023.0084","DOIUrl":"10.1308/rcsann.2023.0084","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Substantial evidence exists for the superiority of emergency over delayed cholecystectomy for gallstone disease during primary admission. Despite this, emergency surgery rates in the UK remain low compared with other developed countries, with great variation in care across the nation. We aimed to describe the local paradigm shift towards emergency surgery and investigate outcomes.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This is a prospective observational study examining patients enrolled onto an emergency cholecystectomy pathway, following the hospital's subscription to the Royal College of Surgeons of England's Cholecystectomy Quality Improvement Collaborative (Chole-QuIC), between 1 December 2021 and 31 January 2023. Multivariate logistical regression models were used to identify patient and hospital factors associated with postoperative outcomes.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of the 307 suitable acute admissions, 261 (85%) had an emergency cholecystectomy, compared with 5% preceding the Chole-QuIC interventions. Waiting time dropped from 67 to 5 days. A total of 208 (79.7%) patients were primary presentations, 92 (35.2%) were classed Tokyo grade 2 and 142 (54.4%) were obese. A total of 23 (8.8%) patients underwent preoperative endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography, and 26 (10%) patients had a subtotal cholecystectomy. Favourable outcomes (Clavien Dindo ≥3) were observed in first presentations (odds ratio (OR) 0.35; <i>p</i>=0.042) and for operation times within 7 days (OR 0.32; <i>p</i>=0.037), with worse outcomes in BMI ≥35 (OR 3.32; <i>p</i>=0.005) and operation time >7 days (OR 3.11; <i>p</i>=0.037).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>A paradigm shift towards emergency cholecystectomy benefits both the patient and the service. Positive outcomes are apparent for early operation in patients presenting for the first time and recurrent attendees, with early operation (<7 days) providing the most favourable outcome in a select patient group.</p>","PeriodicalId":8088,"journal":{"name":"Annals of the Royal College of Surgeons of England","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.1,"publicationDate":"2024-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11365725/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"138457469","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
CORESS Feedback: Cases from the Confidential Reporting System for Surgery. CORESS 反馈:来自外科手术保密报告系统的病例。
IF 1.1 4区 医学 Q3 SURGERY Pub Date : 2024-09-01 DOI: 10.1308/rcsann.2024.0074
H Corbett

CORESS is an independent charity, supported by AXA Health, the MDU and the Kirby Laing Foundation. We are grateful to those who have provided the material for these reports. The online reporting form is available via the CORESS app and on the website (coress.org.uk), which also includes previous Feedback reports. Published cases are acknowledged by a Certificate of Contribution, which may be included in the contributor's record of continuing professional development, or which may form part of appraisal or annual review of competence progression portfolio documentation. Contributions from surgeons in training are particularly welcome.

CORESS 是一家独立的慈善机构,由 AXA Health、MDU 和 Kirby Laing 基金会提供支持。我们对为这些报告提供材料的各方表示感谢。在线报告表可通过 CORESS 应用程序和网站 (coress.org.uk) 获取,网站上还包括以前的反馈报告。发表的病例将获得贡献证书,该证书可纳入贡献者的持续职业发展记录,也可作为评估或年度能力审查进展组合文件的一部分。特别欢迎正在接受培训的外科医生投稿。
{"title":"CORESS Feedback: Cases from the Confidential Reporting System for Surgery.","authors":"H Corbett","doi":"10.1308/rcsann.2024.0074","DOIUrl":"10.1308/rcsann.2024.0074","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>CORESS is an independent charity, supported by AXA Health, the MDU and the Kirby Laing Foundation. We are grateful to those who have provided the material for these reports. The online reporting form is available via the CORESS app and on the website (coress.org.uk), which also includes previous Feedback reports. Published cases are acknowledged by a Certificate of Contribution, which may be included in the contributor's record of continuing professional development, or which may form part of appraisal or annual review of competence progression portfolio documentation. Contributions from surgeons in training are particularly welcome.</p>","PeriodicalId":8088,"journal":{"name":"Annals of the Royal College of Surgeons of England","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.1,"publicationDate":"2024-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11368157/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142103766","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Long-term efficacy of total versus posterior partial fundoplication in patients with gastro-oesophageal reflux disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis. 胃食管反流病患者完全胃底折叠术与后部胃底折叠手术的长期疗效:一项系统综述和荟萃分析。
IF 1.1 4区 医学 Q3 SURGERY Pub Date : 2024-09-01 Epub Date: 2023-10-16 DOI: 10.1308/rcsann.2023.0046
D V Peristeri, H Room, D Tsironis, G Vasilikostas, A Wan

Introduction: Laparoscopic fundoplication remains the standard treatment for patients with severe gastro-oesophageal reflux disease (GORD). Multiple randomised controlled trials (RCTs) have compared the two most commonly performed surgical techniques, total and posterior partial fundoplication (Nissen [NF] and Toupet [TF]), in terms of symptom control and treatment failure in patients without subsequent dysmotility disorders. We aimed to conduct a systematic review and meta-analysis of these two techniques with regard to the long-term effect on reflux control and associated dysphagia.

Methods: The MEDLINE®, Embase®, PubMed® and Cochrane Library databases were searched, and all the relevant published RCTs were shortlisted according to the inclusion criteria. The summated outcomes of long-term results relating to the recurrence of GORD and dysphagia were evaluated in a meta-analysis using RevMan software.

Results: Eight studies (all RCTs) on 1,545 patients undergoing NF or TF were eligible for inclusion in this meta-analysis. There were 799 patients in the NF group and 746 in the TF group. In the random effects model analysis, the incidence of long-term recurrence of GORD was not statistically different between the NF and TF cohorts (odds ratio [OR]: 0.69, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.34-1.41, z=1.01, p=0.31). However, the incidence of long-term dysphagia was statistically lower in the TF group (OR: 2.92, 95% CI: 1.49-5.72, z=3.13, p=0.002) with low between-study heterogeneity (I2=0%).

Conclusions: The findings of this systematic review and meta-analysis on symptomatic GORD appear to be in favour of partial posterior fundoplication (TF) as the optimal treatment. It provides equivalent outcomes in reflux symptom control with a lower risk of postoperative dysphagia compared with total fundoplication (NF).

引言:腹腔镜胃底折叠术仍然是严重胃食管反流病(GORD)患者的标准治疗方法。多项随机对照试验(RCT)比较了两种最常用的手术技术,即全胃底折叠术和后胃部分折叠术(Nissen[NF]和Toupet[TF]),在症状控制和治疗失败方面,对没有后续运动障碍的患者进行了比较。我们旨在对这两种技术对反流控制和相关吞咽困难的长期影响进行系统综述和荟萃分析。方法:检索MEDLINE®、Embase®、PubMed®和Cochrane Library数据库,并根据纳入标准将所有相关已发表的随机对照试验入围。在一项使用RevMan软件的荟萃分析中评估了与GORD复发和吞咽困难相关的长期结果的汇总结果。结果:对1545名接受NF或TF治疗的患者进行的8项研究(均为随机对照试验)符合纳入该荟萃分析的条件。NF组799例,TF组746例。在随机效应模型分析中,NF和TF队列之间GORD长期复发的发生率没有统计学差异(比值比[OR]:0.69,95%置信区间[CI]:0.34-1.41,z=1.01,p=0.31)。然而,TF组的长期吞咽困难发生率在统计学上较低(OR:2.92,95%CI:1.49-5.72,z=3.13,p=0.002),研究间异质性较低(I2=0%)。结论:这项关于症状性GORD的系统综述和荟萃分析的结果似乎有利于部分后胃底折叠术(TF)作为最佳治疗方法。与全胃底折叠术(NF)相比,它在反流症状控制方面提供了同等的结果,术后吞咽困难的风险更低。
{"title":"Long-term efficacy of total versus posterior partial fundoplication in patients with gastro-oesophageal reflux disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis.","authors":"D V Peristeri, H Room, D Tsironis, G Vasilikostas, A Wan","doi":"10.1308/rcsann.2023.0046","DOIUrl":"10.1308/rcsann.2023.0046","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Laparoscopic fundoplication remains the standard treatment for patients with severe gastro-oesophageal reflux disease (GORD). Multiple randomised controlled trials (RCTs) have compared the two most commonly performed surgical techniques, total and posterior partial fundoplication (Nissen [NF] and Toupet [TF]), in terms of symptom control and treatment failure in patients without subsequent dysmotility disorders. We aimed to conduct a systematic review and meta-analysis of these two techniques with regard to the long-term effect on reflux control and associated dysphagia.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The MEDLINE<sup>®</sup>, Embase<sup>®</sup>, PubMed<sup>®</sup> and Cochrane Library databases were searched, and all the relevant published RCTs were shortlisted according to the inclusion criteria. The summated outcomes of long-term results relating to the recurrence of GORD and dysphagia were evaluated in a meta-analysis using RevMan software.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Eight studies (all RCTs) on 1,545 patients undergoing NF or TF were eligible for inclusion in this meta-analysis. There were 799 patients in the NF group and 746 in the TF group. In the random effects model analysis, the incidence of long-term recurrence of GORD was not statistically different between the NF and TF cohorts (odds ratio [OR]: 0.69, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.34-1.41, z=1.01, <i>p</i>=0.31). However, the incidence of long-term dysphagia was statistically lower in the TF group (OR: 2.92, 95% CI: 1.49-5.72, z=3.13, <i>p</i>=0.002) with low between-study heterogeneity (I<sup>2</sup>=0%).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The findings of this systematic review and meta-analysis on symptomatic GORD appear to be in favour of partial posterior fundoplication (TF) as the optimal treatment. It provides equivalent outcomes in reflux symptom control with a lower risk of postoperative dysphagia compared with total fundoplication (NF).</p>","PeriodicalId":8088,"journal":{"name":"Annals of the Royal College of Surgeons of England","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.1,"publicationDate":"2024-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11365733/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"41231883","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Operative and non-operative management for intestinal emergencies: findings from a single-centre retrospective cohort study. 肠急症的手术和非手术治疗:一项单中心回顾性队列研究的结果
IF 1.1 4区 医学 Q3 SURGERY Pub Date : 2024-09-01 Epub Date: 2023-12-01 DOI: 10.1308/rcsann.2023.0093
A R Darbyshire, I Kostakis, P Meredith, C Kovacs, D Prytherch, J Briggs, Skc Toh

Background: Patients with an intestinal emergency who do not have surgery are poorly characterised. This study used electronic healthcare records to provide a rapid insight into the number of patients admitted with an intestinal emergency and compare short-term outcomes for non-operative and operative management.

Methods: A single-centre retrospective cohort study was conducted at a tertiary NHS hospital (from 1 December 2013 to 31 January 2020). Patients were identified using diagnosis codes for intestinal emergencies, based on the inclusion criteria for the National Emergency Laparotomy Audit. Relevant data were extracted from electronic healthcare records (n=3,997).

Results: Nearly half of patients admitted with an intestinal emergency received nonoperative management (43.7%). Of those who underwent surgery, 63.7% were started laparoscopically. The non-operative group had a shorter hospital stay (median: 5.4 days vs 8.2 days [started laparoscopically] or 16.8 days [started open]) and fewer unintended intensive care admissions than the surgical group (2.4% vs 8.7% [started laparoscopically] 21.1% [started open]). However, 30-day mortality for non-operative treatment was double that for surgery (22.4% vs 10.1%). The 30-day mortality rate was found to be even higher for non-operative management (50.3%) compared with surgery (19.5%) in a sub-analysis of patients with admission National Early Warning Score ≥4 (n=683).

Conclusion: The proportion of patients with intestinal emergencies who do not have surgery is greater than expected, and it appears that many respond well to non-operative treatment. However, 30-day mortality for non-operative management was high, and the low number of admissions to intensive care suggests that major invasive treatment was not appropriate for most in this group.

背景:未行手术的肠急症患者特征不佳。本研究使用电子医疗记录来快速了解因肠道急症入院的患者数量,并比较非手术治疗和手术治疗的短期结果。方法:从2013年12月1日至2020年1月31日,在一家三级NHS医院进行了一项单中心回顾性队列研究。根据国家紧急剖腹手术审计的纳入标准,使用肠急症诊断代码对患者进行识别。相关数据提取自电子医疗记录(n=3,997)。结果:近一半的肠道急症患者接受了非手术治疗(43.7%)。在接受手术的患者中,63.7%是从腹腔镜开始的。非手术组住院时间较短(中位数:5.4天vs 8.2天[开始腹腔镜手术]或16.8天[开始开腹手术]),非预期重症监护入院率低于手术组(2.4% vs 8.7%[开始腹腔镜手术]21.1%[开始开腹手术])。然而,非手术治疗的30天死亡率是手术治疗的两倍(22.4%对10.1%)。在国家早期预警评分≥4的入院患者(n=683)的亚分析中,发现非手术治疗的30天死亡率(50.3%)比手术(19.5%)更高。结论:肠道急症患者不手术的比例大于预期,而且许多患者对非手术治疗效果良好。然而,非手术治疗的30天死亡率很高,重症监护入院人数较少,这表明对该组大多数患者来说,主要的侵入性治疗是不合适的。
{"title":"Operative and non-operative management for intestinal emergencies: findings from a single-centre retrospective cohort study.","authors":"A R Darbyshire, I Kostakis, P Meredith, C Kovacs, D Prytherch, J Briggs, Skc Toh","doi":"10.1308/rcsann.2023.0093","DOIUrl":"10.1308/rcsann.2023.0093","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Patients with an intestinal emergency who do not have surgery are poorly characterised. This study used electronic healthcare records to provide a rapid insight into the number of patients admitted with an intestinal emergency and compare short-term outcomes for non-operative and operative management.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A single-centre retrospective cohort study was conducted at a tertiary NHS hospital (from 1 December 2013 to 31 January 2020). Patients were identified using diagnosis codes for intestinal emergencies, based on the inclusion criteria for the National Emergency Laparotomy Audit. Relevant data were extracted from electronic healthcare records (<i>n</i>=3,997).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Nearly half of patients admitted with an intestinal emergency received nonoperative management (43.7%). Of those who underwent surgery, 63.7% were started laparoscopically. The non-operative group had a shorter hospital stay (median: 5.4 days vs 8.2 days [started laparoscopically] or 16.8 days [started open]) and fewer unintended intensive care admissions than the surgical group (2.4% vs 8.7% [started laparoscopically] 21.1% [started open]). However, 30-day mortality for non-operative treatment was double that for surgery (22.4% vs 10.1%). The 30-day mortality rate was found to be even higher for non-operative management (50.3%) compared with surgery (19.5%) in a sub-analysis of patients with admission National Early Warning Score ≥4 (<i>n</i>=683).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The proportion of patients with intestinal emergencies who do not have surgery is greater than expected, and it appears that many respond well to non-operative treatment. However, 30-day mortality for non-operative management was high, and the low number of admissions to intensive care suggests that major invasive treatment was not appropriate for most in this group.</p>","PeriodicalId":8088,"journal":{"name":"Annals of the Royal College of Surgeons of England","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.1,"publicationDate":"2024-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11365722/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"138457467","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Outcomes following reverse total shoulder arthroplasty vs operative fixation for proximal humerus fractures: a systematic review and meta-analysis. 肱骨近端骨折逆行全肩关节置换术与手术固定的疗效:系统回顾和荟萃分析。
IF 1.1 4区 医学 Q3 SURGERY Pub Date : 2024-09-01 Epub Date: 2023-12-01 DOI: 10.1308/rcsann.2022.0120
S M Heo, H Faulkner, Vvg An, M Symes, H Nandapalan, B Sivakumar

Introduction: Proximal humerus fractures are common in the older population. A consensus on the optimal management of complex fractures requiring surgery has yet to be reached. A systematic review and meta-analysis was performed to compare clinical outcomes between reverse total shoulder arthroplasty (RTSA) and open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF).

Methods: A systematic search of the literature was undertaken using the Medline®, PubMed, Embase™ and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials databases. Prospective and retrospective studies comparing clinical and patient reported results as primary outcome measures were included in this review, with secondary outcome measures including complications and revision surgery. A meta-analysis was conducted.

Results: A total of 326 patients from 5 studies were eligible for inclusion in this review. Superior Constant-Murley scores (mean difference [MD]: 13.4, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 6.2-20.6; p<0.001), Oxford shoulder scores (MD: 4.3, 95% CI: 1.2-7.4; p=0.007), simple shoulder test scores (MD: 0.95, 95% CI: 0.01-1.89; p=0.05) and DASH (Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand) scores (MD: 5.1 [1 study], 95% CI: 2.1-8.1; p=0.034) were noted in patients receiving RTSA. Range of motion and revision surgery rates were also superior in this group.

Conclusions: This study suggests that RTSA affords more favourable outcomes and lower revision rates than ORIF following proximal humerus fractures. Definitive conclusions are precluded, however, owing to small sample sizes and risk of bias in retrospective studies.

肱骨近端骨折在老年人中很常见。对于需要手术治疗的复杂骨折的最佳治疗方法尚未达成共识。系统回顾和荟萃分析比较了逆行全肩关节置换术(RTSA)和切开复位内固定(ORIF)的临床结果。方法:使用Medline®、PubMed、Embase™和Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials数据库对文献进行系统检索。本综述包括前瞻性和回顾性研究,比较临床和患者报告的结果作为主要结局指标,次要结局指标包括并发症和翻修手术。进行meta分析。结果:来自5项研究的326名患者符合纳入本综述的条件。优Constant-Murley评分(平均差[MD]: 13.4, 95%可信区间[CI]: 6.2-20.6;pp=0.007),单肩测试分数(MD: 0.95, 95% CI: 0.01-1.89;p=0.05)和DASH(手臂、肩膀和手的残疾)评分(MD: 5.1[1项研究],95% CI: 2.1-8.1;p=0.034)。该组的活动范围和翻修手术率也较好。结论:本研究表明,肱骨近端骨折后,RTSA比ORIF具有更好的预后和更低的翻修率。然而,由于回顾性研究样本量小且存在偏倚风险,因此无法得出明确的结论。
{"title":"Outcomes following reverse total shoulder arthroplasty vs operative fixation for proximal humerus fractures: a systematic review and meta-analysis.","authors":"S M Heo, H Faulkner, Vvg An, M Symes, H Nandapalan, B Sivakumar","doi":"10.1308/rcsann.2022.0120","DOIUrl":"10.1308/rcsann.2022.0120","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Proximal humerus fractures are common in the older population. A consensus on the optimal management of complex fractures requiring surgery has yet to be reached. A systematic review and meta-analysis was performed to compare clinical outcomes between reverse total shoulder arthroplasty (RTSA) and open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A systematic search of the literature was undertaken using the Medline<sup>®</sup>, PubMed, Embase™ and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials databases. Prospective and retrospective studies comparing clinical and patient reported results as primary outcome measures were included in this review, with secondary outcome measures including complications and revision surgery. A meta-analysis was conducted.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 326 patients from 5 studies were eligible for inclusion in this review. Superior Constant-Murley scores (mean difference [MD]: 13.4, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 6.2-20.6; <i>p</i><0.001), Oxford shoulder scores (MD: 4.3, 95% CI: 1.2-7.4; <i>p</i>=0.007), simple shoulder test scores (MD: 0.95, 95% CI: 0.01-1.89; <i>p</i>=0.05) and DASH (Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand) scores (MD: 5.1 [1 study], 95% CI: 2.1-8.1; <i>p</i>=0.034) were noted in patients receiving RTSA. Range of motion and revision surgery rates were also superior in this group.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This study suggests that RTSA affords more favourable outcomes and lower revision rates than ORIF following proximal humerus fractures. Definitive conclusions are precluded, however, owing to small sample sizes and risk of bias in retrospective studies.</p>","PeriodicalId":8088,"journal":{"name":"Annals of the Royal College of Surgeons of England","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.1,"publicationDate":"2024-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11365726/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"138457468","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
A surgeon-modified device for the evacuation of diathermy smoke. 用于排出电疗烟雾的外科医生改良装置。
IF 1.1 4区 医学 Q3 SURGERY Pub Date : 2024-08-29 DOI: 10.1308/rcsann.2024.0061
O D Brown, S Aroori
{"title":"A surgeon-modified device for the evacuation of diathermy smoke.","authors":"O D Brown, S Aroori","doi":"10.1308/rcsann.2024.0061","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1308/rcsann.2024.0061","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":8088,"journal":{"name":"Annals of the Royal College of Surgeons of England","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.1,"publicationDate":"2024-08-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142103765","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
期刊
Annals of the Royal College of Surgeons of England
全部 Acc. Chem. Res. ACS Applied Bio Materials ACS Appl. Electron. Mater. ACS Appl. Energy Mater. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces ACS Appl. Nano Mater. ACS Appl. Polym. Mater. ACS BIOMATER-SCI ENG ACS Catal. ACS Cent. Sci. ACS Chem. Biol. ACS Chemical Health & Safety ACS Chem. Neurosci. ACS Comb. Sci. ACS Earth Space Chem. ACS Energy Lett. ACS Infect. Dis. ACS Macro Lett. ACS Mater. Lett. ACS Med. Chem. Lett. ACS Nano ACS Omega ACS Photonics ACS Sens. ACS Sustainable Chem. Eng. ACS Synth. Biol. Anal. Chem. BIOCHEMISTRY-US Bioconjugate Chem. BIOMACROMOLECULES Chem. Res. Toxicol. Chem. Rev. Chem. Mater. CRYST GROWTH DES ENERG FUEL Environ. Sci. Technol. Environ. Sci. Technol. Lett. Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. IND ENG CHEM RES Inorg. Chem. J. Agric. Food. Chem. J. Chem. Eng. Data J. Chem. Educ. J. Chem. Inf. Model. J. Chem. Theory Comput. J. Med. Chem. J. Nat. Prod. J PROTEOME RES J. Am. Chem. Soc. LANGMUIR MACROMOLECULES Mol. Pharmaceutics Nano Lett. Org. Lett. ORG PROCESS RES DEV ORGANOMETALLICS J. Org. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. A J. Phys. Chem. B J. Phys. Chem. C J. Phys. Chem. Lett. Analyst Anal. Methods Biomater. Sci. Catal. Sci. Technol. Chem. Commun. Chem. Soc. Rev. CHEM EDUC RES PRACT CRYSTENGCOMM Dalton Trans. Energy Environ. Sci. ENVIRON SCI-NANO ENVIRON SCI-PROC IMP ENVIRON SCI-WAT RES Faraday Discuss. Food Funct. Green Chem. Inorg. Chem. Front. Integr. Biol. J. Anal. At. Spectrom. J. Mater. Chem. A J. Mater. Chem. B J. Mater. Chem. C Lab Chip Mater. Chem. Front. Mater. Horiz. MEDCHEMCOMM Metallomics Mol. Biosyst. Mol. Syst. Des. Eng. Nanoscale Nanoscale Horiz. Nat. Prod. Rep. New J. Chem. Org. Biomol. Chem. Org. Chem. Front. PHOTOCH PHOTOBIO SCI PCCP Polym. Chem.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1