Pub Date : 2024-10-22DOI: 10.1308/rcsann.2024.0089
A Vijay, P A Brennan, M Fagbohun, R S Oeppen, D Parry
Studies have demonstrated the negative impact that work-related musculoskeletal disorders (WMSDs) have on surgeons. These are also likely to affect some allied healthcare professionals such as interventional radiologists. Problems from WMSDs include pain, diminished technical and cognitive performance, and work absence. These could contribute to burnout, to which surgeons are already vulnerable owing to other working practices such as shift patterns and long hours. WMSDs could negatively affect working performance, and lead to poorer surgical outcomes and patient care. Surgeons are at risk of WMSDs of the neck and back that result from fixed and damaging postures while operating. Some have reduced their operation numbers and working days as result of WMSDs. Theatre ergonomics (e.g. table positioning, operating stools and monitors), intraoperative breaks and stretching may improve WMSDs for some. Strength/resistance training (RT) may be used to prevent or mitigate WMSDs. RT can also enhance general health and concentration, and combat intraoperative fatigue. Low engagement times of moderate-intensity RT of 20 minutes, twice a week, improve neck and back pain from WMSDs. Moreover, RT has been shown to reduce all-cause mortality by up to 15%, increase bone density, improve proprioception and reduce the fear of movement due to pain. Alongside ergonomic improvement and stretching, we recommend RT as an activity to improve general health and WMSDs.
{"title":"Could resistance training prevent or improve work-related musculoskeletal disorders among surgeons?","authors":"A Vijay, P A Brennan, M Fagbohun, R S Oeppen, D Parry","doi":"10.1308/rcsann.2024.0089","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1308/rcsann.2024.0089","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Studies have demonstrated the negative impact that work-related musculoskeletal disorders (WMSDs) have on surgeons. These are also likely to affect some allied healthcare professionals such as interventional radiologists. Problems from WMSDs include pain, diminished technical and cognitive performance, and work absence. These could contribute to burnout, to which surgeons are already vulnerable owing to other working practices such as shift patterns and long hours. WMSDs could negatively affect working performance, and lead to poorer surgical outcomes and patient care. Surgeons are at risk of WMSDs of the neck and back that result from fixed and damaging postures while operating. Some have reduced their operation numbers and working days as result of WMSDs. Theatre ergonomics (e.g. table positioning, operating stools and monitors), intraoperative breaks and stretching may improve WMSDs for some. Strength/resistance training (RT) may be used to prevent or mitigate WMSDs. RT can also enhance general health and concentration, and combat intraoperative fatigue. Low engagement times of moderate-intensity RT of 20 minutes, twice a week, improve neck and back pain from WMSDs. Moreover, RT has been shown to reduce all-cause mortality by up to 15%, increase bone density, improve proprioception and reduce the fear of movement due to pain. Alongside ergonomic improvement and stretching, we recommend RT as an activity to improve general health and WMSDs.</p>","PeriodicalId":8088,"journal":{"name":"Annals of the Royal College of Surgeons of England","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.1,"publicationDate":"2024-10-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142456671","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-10-22DOI: 10.1308/rcsann.2024.0087
E N Patton, I Lisagors, I Tyrrell-Marsh, S Agarwal, L V Wee, A Darwish, S R Smith
Introduction: Deficiencies in non-technical skills can severely impede the functioning of teams in high-intensity scenarios, such as in damage control surgery for the critically injured trauma patient. Truncated preoperative checklists, modified from the standard World Health Organization preoperative checklist, and situational reporting at intervals during surgery are long-established practices in the military, and are recommended in the National Health Service guidelines on major incidents. These tools allow the multiprofessional team to create a shared mental model of the anaesthetic and operative plan, thereby improving team efficiency. Our aim was to establish whether adult major trauma centres in England are using truncated preoperative checklists and situational reporting for damage control surgery.
Methods: An online survey was devised and distributed via the national programme of care for trauma in November 2020.
Results: Responses were received from all 23 adult major trauma centres in England. Nine centres (39.1%) reported using a truncated preoperative checklist for damage control surgery albeit in a variety of formats. Common components were blood products received and/or available, presence of allergies, tranexamic acid and antibiotic administration, availability of viscoelastic tests, equipment required, availability of cell saver, role allocation and reference to other personnel needed, and discussion of the plan. Twelve centres (52.2%) have formal policies in place for situational reporting. Again, these were in multiple formats but all focused on patient physiology to direct surgical planning.
Conclusions: We have identified key components to advanced communication aids for damage control surgery, providing a foundation on which other major trauma centres can build their own versions of these potentially lifesaving tools.
{"title":"Improving communication during damage control surgery: a survey of adult major trauma centres in England.","authors":"E N Patton, I Lisagors, I Tyrrell-Marsh, S Agarwal, L V Wee, A Darwish, S R Smith","doi":"10.1308/rcsann.2024.0087","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1308/rcsann.2024.0087","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Deficiencies in non-technical skills can severely impede the functioning of teams in high-intensity scenarios, such as in damage control surgery for the critically injured trauma patient. Truncated preoperative checklists, modified from the standard World Health Organization preoperative checklist, and situational reporting at intervals during surgery are long-established practices in the military, and are recommended in the National Health Service guidelines on major incidents. These tools allow the multiprofessional team to create a shared mental model of the anaesthetic and operative plan, thereby improving team efficiency. Our aim was to establish whether adult major trauma centres in England are using truncated preoperative checklists and situational reporting for damage control surgery.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>An online survey was devised and distributed via the national programme of care for trauma in November 2020.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Responses were received from all 23 adult major trauma centres in England. Nine centres (39.1%) reported using a truncated preoperative checklist for damage control surgery albeit in a variety of formats. Common components were blood products received and/or available, presence of allergies, tranexamic acid and antibiotic administration, availability of viscoelastic tests, equipment required, availability of cell saver, role allocation and reference to other personnel needed, and discussion of the plan. Twelve centres (52.2%) have formal policies in place for situational reporting. Again, these were in multiple formats but all focused on patient physiology to direct surgical planning.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>We have identified key components to advanced communication aids for damage control surgery, providing a foundation on which other major trauma centres can build their own versions of these potentially lifesaving tools.</p>","PeriodicalId":8088,"journal":{"name":"Annals of the Royal College of Surgeons of England","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.1,"publicationDate":"2024-10-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142456672","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-10-22DOI: 10.1308/rcsann.2024.0076
R Elayyan, M Rizk, C Shah, R Price, N Garg
Mammary myofibroblastoma (MFB) is a rare benign spindle cell tumour predominantly affecting males, but also observed in postmenopausal females. Its diagnosis remains challenging owing to overlapping histological features with malignant lesions and limited tissue sampling in core biopsies. We present a case of incidentally discovered mammary MFB in a 63-year-old man and review its clinical, radiological and histopathological characteristics. The patient, who had a history of distal pancreatectomy and splenectomy, presented with an incidental left anterior chest wall nodule discovered on computed tomography scan. Clinical examination revealed a benign left retroareolar lump, confirmed by breast ultrasound and mammography. Ultrasound-guided core biopsy demonstrated characteristic spindle cells, prompting immunohistochemical staining confirming the diagnosis of MFB. The lesion was surgically excised with clear margins. Mammary MFB is commonly seen in postmenopausal women and older men, presenting as painless, mobile breast lumps. Imaging findings are nonspecific, resembling fibroadenomas or fat necrosis. Histologically, MFB lacks mammary ducts or lobules and displays characteristic spindle cells with collagenous stroma. Immunohistochemistry aids in differentiating it from other spindle cell tumours. Surgical excision is curative, with no reported cases with recurrence. Mammary MFB should be considered in the differential diagnosis of breast masses in males and postmenopausal women. Despite the challenges in diagnosis, its benign nature and favourable prognosis warrant timely recognition and appropriate management through surgical excision. Further research is needed to establish clear management guidelines and explore its underlying pathogenesis.
{"title":"Mammary myofibroblastoma of the male breast: a case report and literature review.","authors":"R Elayyan, M Rizk, C Shah, R Price, N Garg","doi":"10.1308/rcsann.2024.0076","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1308/rcsann.2024.0076","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Mammary myofibroblastoma (MFB) is a rare benign spindle cell tumour predominantly affecting males, but also observed in postmenopausal females. Its diagnosis remains challenging owing to overlapping histological features with malignant lesions and limited tissue sampling in core biopsies. We present a case of incidentally discovered mammary MFB in a 63-year-old man and review its clinical, radiological and histopathological characteristics. The patient, who had a history of distal pancreatectomy and splenectomy, presented with an incidental left anterior chest wall nodule discovered on computed tomography scan. Clinical examination revealed a benign left retroareolar lump, confirmed by breast ultrasound and mammography. Ultrasound-guided core biopsy demonstrated characteristic spindle cells, prompting immunohistochemical staining confirming the diagnosis of MFB. The lesion was surgically excised with clear margins. Mammary MFB is commonly seen in postmenopausal women and older men, presenting as painless, mobile breast lumps. Imaging findings are nonspecific, resembling fibroadenomas or fat necrosis. Histologically, MFB lacks mammary ducts or lobules and displays characteristic spindle cells with collagenous stroma. Immunohistochemistry aids in differentiating it from other spindle cell tumours. Surgical excision is curative, with no reported cases with recurrence. Mammary MFB should be considered in the differential diagnosis of breast masses in males and postmenopausal women. Despite the challenges in diagnosis, its benign nature and favourable prognosis warrant timely recognition and appropriate management through surgical excision. Further research is needed to establish clear management guidelines and explore its underlying pathogenesis.</p>","PeriodicalId":8088,"journal":{"name":"Annals of the Royal College of Surgeons of England","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.1,"publicationDate":"2024-10-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142456673","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-10-22DOI: 10.1308/rcsann.2024.0053
Z R Almansoor, R Abrar, H Raja
Introduction: The objective of this study was to assess the readability and quality of online written information on epistaxis.
Methods: The terms 'epistaxis' and 'nosebleed' were entered into Google. The first six webpages generated for each search term were screened. Readability was assessed using the Flesch-Kincaid Reading Ease Score (FRES), Flesch-Kincaid Grade Level (FKGL), Simple Measure of Gobbledygook (SMOG) Index and Gunning Fog Index (GFOG). Quality was assessed using the DISCERN instrument. Spearman's correlation between quality and readability was calculated.
Results: A total of 37 websites met the inclusion criteria. The mean and 95% confidence intervals for FRES, FKGL, SMOG and GFOG were 58.9 (55.3-62.5), 9.65 (8.74-10.6), 9.18 (8.57-9.8) and 12.5 (11.5-13.5), respectively. The DISCERN score was 34.3 (32.0-36.5). Weak negative correlation was noted between DISCERN and FRES (rs = -0.15, p = 0.36).
Conclusions: Online information on epistaxis is generally of poor quality and low readability.
{"title":"Assessing the readability and quality of online written information on epistaxis.","authors":"Z R Almansoor, R Abrar, H Raja","doi":"10.1308/rcsann.2024.0053","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1308/rcsann.2024.0053","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>The objective of this study was to assess the readability and quality of online written information on epistaxis.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The terms 'epistaxis' and 'nosebleed' were entered into Google. The first six webpages generated for each search term were screened. Readability was assessed using the Flesch-Kincaid Reading Ease Score (FRES), Flesch-Kincaid Grade Level (FKGL), Simple Measure of Gobbledygook (SMOG) Index and Gunning Fog Index (GFOG). Quality was assessed using the DISCERN instrument. Spearman's correlation between quality and readability was calculated.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 37 websites met the inclusion criteria. The mean and 95% confidence intervals for FRES, FKGL, SMOG and GFOG were 58.9 (55.3-62.5), 9.65 (8.74-10.6), 9.18 (8.57-9.8) and 12.5 (11.5-13.5), respectively. The DISCERN score was 34.3 (32.0-36.5). Weak negative correlation was noted between DISCERN and FRES (<i>r<sub>s</sub></i> = -0.15, <i>p</i> = 0.36).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Online information on epistaxis is generally of poor quality and low readability.</p>","PeriodicalId":8088,"journal":{"name":"Annals of the Royal College of Surgeons of England","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.1,"publicationDate":"2024-10-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142456670","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-10-22DOI: 10.1308/rcsann.2024.0086
K M Spellar, A Z Chacko, C Beaton
Introduction: Within the past five years there has been a significant increase in the number of international medical graduates (IMGs) joining the United Kingdom's (UK) workforce. Having mentors and supervisors who understand the needs of IMGs and clinical and cultural differences in the workplace can benefit in the transition to working in a new country. Improving knowledge of and understanding differences between general surgical training programmes and grades across different countries could therefore aid in the support of IMGs within the UK.
Methods: Data on general surgical training programmes of the top ten countries for the primary medical qualifications of IMGs in the UK were collected to provide comparison with the UK training programme.
Results: The following countries were included: UK, India, Pakistan, Nigeria, Egypt, Ireland, Sudan, Sri Lanka, Romania, Iraq and South Africa. Training programme lengths ranged from 3 to 10 years. Only some training programmes provide additional training and qualification in sub-specialisation in general surgery. Other differences included a requirement for internship/non specialist training prior to training, differences in lengths of time spent in other surgical specialties and a requirement for research.
Conclusion: Understanding the training programmes of other countries may help UK surgeons to understand the prior experience of IMGs and enable them to provide better training and support.
{"title":"A comparison of general surgery training programmes across 11 countries: improving understanding of the experience level of international medical graduates in the UK.","authors":"K M Spellar, A Z Chacko, C Beaton","doi":"10.1308/rcsann.2024.0086","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1308/rcsann.2024.0086","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Within the past five years there has been a significant increase in the number of international medical graduates (IMGs) joining the United Kingdom's (UK) workforce. Having mentors and supervisors who understand the needs of IMGs and clinical and cultural differences in the workplace can benefit in the transition to working in a new country. Improving knowledge of and understanding differences between general surgical training programmes and grades across different countries could therefore aid in the support of IMGs within the UK.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Data on general surgical training programmes of the top ten countries for the primary medical qualifications of IMGs in the UK were collected to provide comparison with the UK training programme.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The following countries were included: UK, India, Pakistan, Nigeria, Egypt, Ireland, Sudan, Sri Lanka, Romania, Iraq and South Africa. Training programme lengths ranged from 3 to 10 years. Only some training programmes provide additional training and qualification in sub-specialisation in general surgery. Other differences included a requirement for internship/non specialist training prior to training, differences in lengths of time spent in other surgical specialties and a requirement for research.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Understanding the training programmes of other countries may help UK surgeons to understand the prior experience of IMGs and enable them to provide better training and support.</p>","PeriodicalId":8088,"journal":{"name":"Annals of the Royal College of Surgeons of England","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.1,"publicationDate":"2024-10-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142456669","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-10-09DOI: 10.1308/rcsann.2024.0077
A Abdelrahim, O Ali, D Kamali, A Reddy, S Harrison, M Boshnaq, H Abudeeb, F Ashoush, M Qulaghassi, S Eldesouky, M Mansour, S F Rahman-Casans, K Osman
Introduction: The aim of this study was to assess the yield of the endoscopic investigations performed following the resolution of acute diverticulitis.
Methods: A retrospective multicentre study included patients with multislice computed tomography (MSCT)-proven diverticulitis, in four NHS hospitals, between January 2016 and April 2023. The primary outcome was the rate of colonic cancer in the diseased segment. Secondary outcomes included the rate of malignancy in the nondiseased colonic segments, the benign colonic polyp detection rate, the rate of malignancy in the resected surgical specimens in patients who underwent an emergency surgery on the index admission and the rate of complications in the investigated group.
Results: A total of 1,120 patients were included in the study, out of which 604 were females, with a median age of 61 years; 731 patients (65%) had uncomplicated diverticulitis (Hinchey 1A) while 389 (35%) had complicated diverticulitis (Hinchey 1B-4). Following the acute episode, 757 (74%) patients had subsequent endoscopic evaluation. The incidence of colorectal cancer (CRC) or advanced adenomas (AA) in patients with uncomplicated diverticulitis was 0.14%. In the complicated diverticulitis group, the incidence of CRC/AA in patients with Hinchey 1b and Hinchey 2 was 1.4% and 5.4%, respectively. Out of the 102 patients who underwent emergency colonic resection for suspected perforated diverticulitis, 18 (17.6%) had histological evidence of colonic malignancy.
Conclusions: Endoscopic investigations following uncomplicated diverticulitis have a low yield for sinister colonic pathology. Colonoscopy should be planned following complicated diverticulitis and in patients with uncomplicated diverticulitis with suspicious radiological finding on index imaging or in patients with ongoing clinical manifestations. In patients who undergo emergency surgery, oncological principles should be applied whenever possible.
{"title":"Analysis of the outcomes of postdiverticulitis investigations: a multicentre cohort study including 1,120 patients.","authors":"A Abdelrahim, O Ali, D Kamali, A Reddy, S Harrison, M Boshnaq, H Abudeeb, F Ashoush, M Qulaghassi, S Eldesouky, M Mansour, S F Rahman-Casans, K Osman","doi":"10.1308/rcsann.2024.0077","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1308/rcsann.2024.0077","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>The aim of this study was to assess the yield of the endoscopic investigations performed following the resolution of acute diverticulitis.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective multicentre study included patients with multislice computed tomography (MSCT)-proven diverticulitis, in four NHS hospitals, between January 2016 and April 2023. The primary outcome was the rate of colonic cancer in the diseased segment. Secondary outcomes included the rate of malignancy in the nondiseased colonic segments, the benign colonic polyp detection rate, the rate of malignancy in the resected surgical specimens in patients who underwent an emergency surgery on the index admission and the rate of complications in the investigated group.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 1,120 patients were included in the study, out of which 604 were females, with a median age of 61 years; 731 patients (65%) had uncomplicated diverticulitis (Hinchey 1A) while 389 (35%) had complicated diverticulitis (Hinchey 1B-4). Following the acute episode, 757 (74%) patients had subsequent endoscopic evaluation. The incidence of colorectal cancer (CRC) or advanced adenomas (AA) in patients with uncomplicated diverticulitis was 0.14%. In the complicated diverticulitis group, the incidence of CRC/AA in patients with Hinchey 1b and Hinchey 2 was 1.4% and 5.4%, respectively. Out of the 102 patients who underwent emergency colonic resection for suspected perforated diverticulitis, 18 (17.6%) had histological evidence of colonic malignancy.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Endoscopic investigations following uncomplicated diverticulitis have a low yield for sinister colonic pathology. Colonoscopy should be planned following complicated diverticulitis and in patients with uncomplicated diverticulitis with suspicious radiological finding on index imaging or in patients with ongoing clinical manifestations. In patients who undergo emergency surgery, oncological principles should be applied whenever possible.</p>","PeriodicalId":8088,"journal":{"name":"Annals of the Royal College of Surgeons of England","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.1,"publicationDate":"2024-10-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142387482","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-10-08DOI: 10.1308/rcsann.2024.0070
R Taha, T R Davis, A A Montgomery, A Karantana
Introduction: Metacarpal shaft fractures (MSF) are common injuries that predominantly affect young, economically active people. However, there is limited evidence to guide their management. The aims of this study were to: evaluate the management of extra-articular MSF of the fingers; assess equipoise for surgical and nonsurgical treatments; and explore factors influencing clinician decision making to inform the design of a randomised controlled trial (RCT) comparing surgical and nonsurgical treatments.
Methods: A cross-sectional, web-based survey was distributed to UK hand surgeons using membership directories of different professional networks. Practice setting, clinical experience, management strategies, willingness to participate in a RCT and factors affecting suitability for randomisation were recorded.
Results: There were 108 responses eligible for analysis. Distribution of clinical experience ranged from <5 to >20 years. A variety of treatments were used for transverse, long oblique/spiral and comminuted MSF. Rotational deformity (90%), step-off deformity (5%) and angulation (5%) were the most important indications for surgical fixation. Acceptable limits of fracture angulation and shortening varied among surgeons. Over 85% expressed interest in participating in a RCT and most showed equipoise and were willing to offer operative or nonoperative treatment as part of a research study.
Conclusions: This survey demonstrates that UK hand surgeons have varying views on treatments, acceptable parameters of deformity and indications for surgical fixation of displaced MSF. There is equipoise for surgical and nonsurgical treatments, variability in factors influencing clinical decision making and support for RCTs to investigate best practice.
{"title":"Management of metacarpal shaft fractures: a survey of current UK practice.","authors":"R Taha, T R Davis, A A Montgomery, A Karantana","doi":"10.1308/rcsann.2024.0070","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1308/rcsann.2024.0070","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Metacarpal shaft fractures (MSF) are common injuries that predominantly affect young, economically active people. However, there is limited evidence to guide their management. The aims of this study were to: evaluate the management of extra-articular MSF of the fingers; assess equipoise for surgical and nonsurgical treatments; and explore factors influencing clinician decision making to inform the design of a randomised controlled trial (RCT) comparing surgical and nonsurgical treatments.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A cross-sectional, web-based survey was distributed to UK hand surgeons using membership directories of different professional networks. Practice setting, clinical experience, management strategies, willingness to participate in a RCT and factors affecting suitability for randomisation were recorded.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There were 108 responses eligible for analysis. Distribution of clinical experience ranged from <5 to >20 years. A variety of treatments were used for transverse, long oblique/spiral and comminuted MSF. Rotational deformity (90%), step-off deformity (5%) and angulation (5%) were the most important indications for surgical fixation. Acceptable limits of fracture angulation and shortening varied among surgeons. Over 85% expressed interest in participating in a RCT and most showed equipoise and were willing to offer operative or nonoperative treatment as part of a research study.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This survey demonstrates that UK hand surgeons have varying views on treatments, acceptable parameters of deformity and indications for surgical fixation of displaced MSF. There is equipoise for surgical and nonsurgical treatments, variability in factors influencing clinical decision making and support for RCTs to investigate best practice.</p>","PeriodicalId":8088,"journal":{"name":"Annals of the Royal College of Surgeons of England","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.1,"publicationDate":"2024-10-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142387483","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-10-08DOI: 10.1308/rcsann.2024.0062
O Edginton, M George, C Bandara, M Johnston, A Rao, M Howse, D Ridgway, P Goldsmith
Introduction: In 2019, a new kidney offering scheme was launched in the United Kingdom, aiming to better match estimated patient survival and graft life expectancy. The scheme's impact on older patients undergoing kidney transplantation (KT) is unknown. This study aims to compare the outcomes of older adult KT recipients before and after introduction of the 2019 scheme.
Methods: A retrospective observational cohort study of older adults who underwent KT was undertaken. Group 1 were transplanted between 1 September 2017 and 31 August 2019 (2006 allocation scheme) and group 2 between 1 September 2019 and 31 August 2021 (2019 offering scheme). An older adult was any person ≥60 years old at the time of KT. Univariable binary logistic regression analysis was performed to determine odds ratios (OR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI).
Results: There were 107 older adult deceased donor KT recipients, 62 from group 1 and 45 from group 2. Median age at transplantation was 68 (interquartile range [IQR] 62-71) and 67 (IQR 64-73) years, respectively. Univariable analysis showed that re-intervention (OR 6.486, 95% CI 1.306-32.216, p = 0.022) and critical care admission (OR 5.619, 95% CI 1.448-21.812, p = 0.013) were significantly more likely in group 2. Group 2 recipients were significantly more likely to have a level 4 human leucocyte antigen (HLA) mismatch (OR 4.667, 95% CI 1.640-13.275, p = 0.004) and to have undergone previous KT (OR 4.691, 95% CI 1.385-15.893, p = 0.013).
Conclusions: The introduction of the 2019 offering scheme was associated with re-intervention and critical care admission for older KT recipients. We also observed less-favourable HLA matches but more KT in difficult-to-match groups.
{"title":"Renal transplantation in older adults: retrospective cohort study to examine the impact of the new 2019 kidney offering scheme on older adult transplant recipients.","authors":"O Edginton, M George, C Bandara, M Johnston, A Rao, M Howse, D Ridgway, P Goldsmith","doi":"10.1308/rcsann.2024.0062","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1308/rcsann.2024.0062","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>In 2019, a new kidney offering scheme was launched in the United Kingdom, aiming to better match estimated patient survival and graft life expectancy. The scheme's impact on older patients undergoing kidney transplantation (KT) is unknown. This study aims to compare the outcomes of older adult KT recipients before and after introduction of the 2019 scheme.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective observational cohort study of older adults who underwent KT was undertaken. Group 1 were transplanted between 1 September 2017 and 31 August 2019 (2006 allocation scheme) and group 2 between 1 September 2019 and 31 August 2021 (2019 offering scheme). An older adult was any person ≥60 years old at the time of KT. Univariable binary logistic regression analysis was performed to determine odds ratios (OR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There were 107 older adult deceased donor KT recipients, 62 from group 1 and 45 from group 2. Median age at transplantation was 68 (interquartile range [IQR] 62-71) and 67 (IQR 64-73) years, respectively. Univariable analysis showed that re-intervention (OR 6.486, 95% CI 1.306-32.216, <i>p</i> = 0.022) and critical care admission (OR 5.619, 95% CI 1.448-21.812, <i>p</i> = 0.013) were significantly more likely in group 2. Group 2 recipients were significantly more likely to have a level 4 human leucocyte antigen (HLA) mismatch (OR 4.667, 95% CI 1.640-13.275, <i>p</i> = 0.004) and to have undergone previous KT (OR 4.691, 95% CI 1.385-15.893, <i>p</i> = 0.013).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The introduction of the 2019 offering scheme was associated with re-intervention and critical care admission for older KT recipients. We also observed less-favourable HLA matches but more KT in difficult-to-match groups.</p>","PeriodicalId":8088,"journal":{"name":"Annals of the Royal College of Surgeons of England","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.1,"publicationDate":"2024-10-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142387484","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-10-03DOI: 10.1308/rcsann.2024.0082
B S Sokhal, Ayy Mohamedahmed, S Zaman, A A Wuheb, H E Abdalla, N Husain, S Hajibandeh, S Hajibandeh
Introduction: The aim of this study was to investigate comparative outcomes of laparoscopic and open repair for peptic ulcer perforation (PUP).
Methods: A PRISMA-compliant systematic review with a PROSPERO-registered protocol (registration number CRD42024529286) was conducted. All randomised controlled trials (RCTs) involving PUP patients managed by laparoscopic or open repair were identified and their risk of bias assessed. Outcome syntheses for perioperative mortality and morbidities, need for reoperation, procedure time and length of hospital stay were conducted using random-effects modelling to calculate risk ratios (RR) or mean difference (MD) with 95% confidence intervals (CI).
Findings: Nine RCTs met the inclusion criteria, enrolling 670 patients of whom 317 were randomised to receive laparoscopic surgery and 353 were managed with open surgery. Laparoscopic repair of PUP significantly reduced mortality (RR 0.37, p = 0.03), total complications (RR 0.57, p = 0.0009), ileus (RR 0.43, p = 0.04), wound complications (RR 0.36, p < 0.0001) and length of hospital stay (MD -2.37, p = 0.0003) compared with the open approach. There were no significant differences in rate of postoperative leak (RR 2.00, 95% CI 0.74-5.41, p = 0.17), abdominal collection (RR 1.19, 95% CI 0.46-3.07, p = 0.72), sepsis (RR 1.17, 95% CI 0.39-3.52, p = 0.65), respiratory complications (RR 0.68, 95% CI 0.32-1.46, p = 0.32), reoperation (RR 1.74, 95% CI 0.57-5.30, p = 0.33) and operating time (MD 15.31, 95% CI -4.86 to 35.47, p = 0.14) between the two groups.
Conclusions: Laparoscopic repair of PUP is associated with significantly lower mortality and morbidity and shorter length of stay compared with the open approach. The laparoscopic approach should be the management of choice subject to the existence of laparoscopic expertise.
导言本研究旨在探讨腹腔镜和开腹修复消化性溃疡穿孔(PUP)的疗效比较:方法:采用 PROSPERO 注册方案(注册号 CRD42024529286)进行符合 PRISMA 标准的系统性综述。确定了所有涉及腹腔镜或开腹修复术治疗的 PUP 患者的随机对照试验 (RCT),并对其偏倚风险进行了评估。采用随机效应模型对围手术期死亡率和发病率、再次手术需求、手术时间和住院时间等结果进行综合分析,计算风险比(RR)或平均差(MD)及95%置信区间(CI):9项研究符合纳入标准,共纳入670例患者,其中317例随机接受腹腔镜手术治疗,353例接受开放手术治疗。与开腹手术相比,腹腔镜修复 PUP 可显著降低死亡率(RR 0.37,p = 0.03)、总并发症(RR 0.57,p = 0.0009)、回肠梗阻(RR 0.43,p = 0.04)、伤口并发症(RR 0.36,p < 0.0001)和住院时间(MD -2.37,p = 0.0003)。术后渗漏率(RR 2.00,95% CI 0.74-5.41,P = 0.17)、腹腔积液(RR 1.19,95% CI 0.46-3.07,P = 0.72)、败血症(RR 1.17,95% CI 0.39-3.52,P = 0.65)、呼吸系统并发症(RR 0.68,95% CI 0.32-1.46,P = 0.32)、再次手术(RR 1.74,95% CI 0.57-5.30,P = 0.33)和手术时间(MD 15.31,95% CI -4.86-35.47,P = 0.14)在两组间存在差异:结论:与开放式方法相比,腹腔镜修复 PUP 的死亡率和发病率明显较低,住院时间也较短。在具备腹腔镜专业知识的前提下,腹腔镜方法应成为首选的治疗方法。
{"title":"Laparoscopic versus open repair for peptic ulcer perforation: a systematic review, meta-analysis and trial sequential analysis of randomised controlled trials. Time to conclude!","authors":"B S Sokhal, Ayy Mohamedahmed, S Zaman, A A Wuheb, H E Abdalla, N Husain, S Hajibandeh, S Hajibandeh","doi":"10.1308/rcsann.2024.0082","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1308/rcsann.2024.0082","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>The aim of this study was to investigate comparative outcomes of laparoscopic and open repair for peptic ulcer perforation (PUP).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A PRISMA-compliant systematic review with a PROSPERO-registered protocol (registration number CRD42024529286) was conducted. All randomised controlled trials (RCTs) involving PUP patients managed by laparoscopic or open repair were identified and their risk of bias assessed. Outcome syntheses for perioperative mortality and morbidities, need for reoperation, procedure time and length of hospital stay were conducted using random-effects modelling to calculate risk ratios (RR) or mean difference (MD) with 95% confidence intervals (CI).</p><p><strong>Findings: </strong>Nine RCTs met the inclusion criteria, enrolling 670 patients of whom 317 were randomised to receive laparoscopic surgery and 353 were managed with open surgery. Laparoscopic repair of PUP significantly reduced mortality (RR 0.37, <i>p</i> = 0.03), total complications (RR 0.57, <i>p</i> = 0.0009), ileus (RR 0.43, <i>p</i> = 0.04), wound complications (RR 0.36, <i>p</i> < 0.0001) and length of hospital stay (MD -2.37, <i>p</i> = 0.0003) compared with the open approach. There were no significant differences in rate of postoperative leak (RR 2.00, 95% CI 0.74-5.41, <i>p</i> = 0.17), abdominal collection (RR 1.19, 95% CI 0.46-3.07, <i>p</i> = 0.72), sepsis (RR 1.17, 95% CI 0.39-3.52, <i>p</i> = 0.65), respiratory complications (RR 0.68, 95% CI 0.32-1.46, <i>p</i> = 0.32), reoperation (RR 1.74, 95% CI 0.57-5.30, <i>p</i> = 0.33) and operating time (MD 15.31, 95% CI -4.86 to 35.47, <i>p</i> = 0.14) between the two groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Laparoscopic repair of PUP is associated with significantly lower mortality and morbidity and shorter length of stay compared with the open approach. The laparoscopic approach should be the management of choice subject to the existence of laparoscopic expertise.</p>","PeriodicalId":8088,"journal":{"name":"Annals of the Royal College of Surgeons of England","volume":" ","pages":"rcsann20240082"},"PeriodicalIF":1.1,"publicationDate":"2024-10-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142364175","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-10-03DOI: 10.1308/rcsann.2024.0079
J Norvill, C Bent, J A Mawhinney, N Johnson
Introduction: Consent forms play an active role in the consent process with generic, handwritten consent forms (GCF) often the standard across the National Health Service. Increasingly, procedure-specific consent forms (PSCF) are being used as an alternative. However, concerns remain about whether they meet the standard for consent. We therefore conducted a systematic review with the objectives of investigating evidence for PSCF, study methodology and medicolegal criteria.
Methods: This systematic review was prospectively registered on PROSPERO (CRD42023392693) and conducted from 1 January 1990 to 17 March 2023 using the MEDLINE, Embase, CINAHL, CENTRAL and Emcare databases. A grey literature search was also performed. All studies evaluating PSCF in medical and surgical settings were included. Risk-of-bias analysis was performed using 'RoB 2' and 'ROBINS-I'. Meta-analysis was not possible because of the results' heterogeneity.
Findings: We identified 21 studies investigating PSCF with no systematic reviews and meta-analyses reported. Most studies were quality improvement projects (n = 10) followed by randomised studies (n = 5). No definitive legal guidance for PSCFs and no studies assessing their role in litigation post-procedural complications were identified. PSCFs were associated with improved documentation (70%-100%; n = 11) and legibility (100%; n = 2) compared with GCF. Randomised studies (n = 4) investigating patient understanding and recall for PSCF were inconclusive compared with GCF.
Conclusions: The heterogeneous evidence available merely demonstrates superior documentation of PSCF compared with GCF. Studies do not adequately investigate the impact on informed consent and fail to address the associated legal concerns. Further randomised studies with patient-centric outcomes and consideration for medicolegal criteria are needed.
{"title":"Role of procedure-specific consent forms in clinical practice: a systematic review.","authors":"J Norvill, C Bent, J A Mawhinney, N Johnson","doi":"10.1308/rcsann.2024.0079","DOIUrl":"10.1308/rcsann.2024.0079","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Consent forms play an active role in the consent process with generic, handwritten consent forms (GCF) often the standard across the National Health Service. Increasingly, procedure-specific consent forms (PSCF) are being used as an alternative. However, concerns remain about whether they meet the standard for consent. We therefore conducted a systematic review with the objectives of investigating evidence for PSCF, study methodology and medicolegal criteria.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This systematic review was prospectively registered on PROSPERO (CRD42023392693) and conducted from 1 January 1990 to 17 March 2023 using the MEDLINE, Embase, CINAHL, CENTRAL and Emcare databases. A grey literature search was also performed. All studies evaluating PSCF in medical and surgical settings were included. Risk-of-bias analysis was performed using 'RoB 2' and 'ROBINS-I'. Meta-analysis was not possible because of the results' heterogeneity.</p><p><strong>Findings: </strong>We identified 21 studies investigating PSCF with no systematic reviews and meta-analyses reported. Most studies were quality improvement projects (<i>n</i> = 10) followed by randomised studies (<i>n</i> = 5). No definitive legal guidance for PSCFs and no studies assessing their role in litigation post-procedural complications were identified. PSCFs were associated with improved documentation (70%-100%; <i>n</i> = 11) and legibility (100%; <i>n</i> = 2) compared with GCF. Randomised studies (<i>n</i> = 4) investigating patient understanding and recall for PSCF were inconclusive compared with GCF.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The heterogeneous evidence available merely demonstrates superior documentation of PSCF compared with GCF. Studies do not adequately investigate the impact on informed consent and fail to address the associated legal concerns. Further randomised studies with patient-centric outcomes and consideration for medicolegal criteria are needed.</p>","PeriodicalId":8088,"journal":{"name":"Annals of the Royal College of Surgeons of England","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.1,"publicationDate":"2024-10-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142364176","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}