首页 > 最新文献

Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation最新文献

英文 中文
Impact of a Digitally Monitored Walking Program on Functional and Psychological Outcomes in Individuals With Mild Traumatic Brain Injury: A Randomized Controlled Trial 数字监测步行计划对轻度创伤性脑损伤患者功能和心理结局的影响:一项随机对照试验。
IF 3.7 2区 医学 Q1 REHABILITATION Pub Date : 2026-01-01 DOI: 10.1016/j.apmr.2025.08.014
Hsin-Ya Tzeng MSc , Cheng-Chiang Chang MD , Sy-Jou Chen MD , Dueng-Yuan Hueng MD , Chi-Ming Chu PhD , Hui-Hsun Chiang PhD

Objective

To evaluate the effects of a 12-week digital walking exercise program on functional capacity and psychological health in individuals with mild traumatic brain injury (mTBI) and the influence of exercise adherence.

Design

Randomized controlled trial with repeated measures.

Setting

Medical center-based recruitment with home-based intervention.

Participants

Fifty-two adults (N=52) (mean age ± SD, 43.98±14.94y; 57.7% women) diagnosed with mTBI (Glasgow Coma Scale score, 13-15) within 6 months postinjury.

Interventions

Participants were randomly assigned to either a digitally monitored walking program group (structured walking ≥30min/session, ≥3times/wk, supported by a wearable fitness tracker and personalized feedback) or an active control group receiving standard exercise education.

Main Outcome Measures

The primary outcome was functional capacity measured by the 6-minute walk test (6MWT). Secondary outcomes included depressive symptoms (Beck Depression Inventory-II) and quality of life (QoL; World Health Organization QoL-Brief Version). Assessments were conducted at baseline and at 4, 8, and 12 weeks. Generalized estimating equations assessed between-group differences. Subgroup analyses evaluated outcomes in participants with ≥80% adherence to moderate-intensity exercise.

Results

The intervention group demonstrated significantly greater improvements in 6MWT distance at 4 weeks (+41.65m, P=.02), 8 weeks (+61.31m, P=.001), and 12 weeks (+65.29m, P=.003) compared with controls. Between-group differences in depressive symptoms and psychological QoL were not statistically significant. However, in the high adherence subgroup (≥80%), significant improvements were observed in functional capacity, as measured by the 6MWT, as well as in depressive symptoms and overall QoL.

Conclusions

A 12-week digital walking exercise program significantly improved functional capacity in individuals with mTBI. Psychological health benefits were evident among those with high adherence to moderate-intensity walking. These findings support the integration of wearable technologies and remote monitoring tools into structured rehabilitation to promote functional recovery from mTBI.
目的:评价为期12周的数字步行运动对轻度创伤性脑损伤(mTBI)患者功能能力和心理健康的影响,并探讨运动坚持性的影响。设计:随机对照试验,重复测量。环境:以医疗中心为基础的招聘,以家庭为基础的干预。参与者:52名成人(平均年龄43.98±14.94,57.7%为女性)在损伤后6个月内诊断为mTBI(格拉斯哥昏迷评分,13-15)。干预措施:参与者被随机分配到数字监测步行计划组(结构化步行≥30分钟/次,≥3次/周,由可穿戴健身追踪器和个性化反馈支持)或接受标准运动教育的积极对照组。主要结局指标:主要结局指标是通过6分钟步行试验(6MWT)测量功能能力。次要结局包括抑郁症状(贝克抑郁量表- ii)和生活质量(WHOQOL-BREF)。在基线、4周、8周和12周进行评估。评估组间差异的广义估计方程。亚组分析评估≥80%坚持中等强度运动的参与者的结果。结果:干预组4周时6MWT距离明显改善(+41.65 m, p = )。02), 8周(+61.31 m, p = 。001), 12周(+65.29 m, p = )。003)与对照组相比。组间抑郁症状及心理生活质量差异无统计学意义。然而,在高依从性亚组(≥80%)中,通过6分钟步行测试(6MWT)测量的功能能力、抑郁症状和总体生活质量均有显著改善。结论:为期12周的数字行走计划可显著改善mTBI患者的功能能力。在那些坚持中等强度步行的人身上,心理健康的好处是显而易见的。这些发现支持将可穿戴技术和远程监测工具整合到结构化康复中,以促进mTBI的功能恢复。
{"title":"Impact of a Digitally Monitored Walking Program on Functional and Psychological Outcomes in Individuals With Mild Traumatic Brain Injury: A Randomized Controlled Trial","authors":"Hsin-Ya Tzeng MSc ,&nbsp;Cheng-Chiang Chang MD ,&nbsp;Sy-Jou Chen MD ,&nbsp;Dueng-Yuan Hueng MD ,&nbsp;Chi-Ming Chu PhD ,&nbsp;Hui-Hsun Chiang PhD","doi":"10.1016/j.apmr.2025.08.014","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.apmr.2025.08.014","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><div>To evaluate the effects of a 12-week digital walking exercise program on functional capacity and psychological health in individuals with mild traumatic brain injury (mTBI) and the influence of exercise adherence.</div></div><div><h3>Design</h3><div>Randomized controlled trial with repeated measures.</div></div><div><h3>Setting</h3><div>Medical center-based recruitment with home-based intervention.</div></div><div><h3>Participants</h3><div>Fifty-two adults (N=52) (mean age ± SD, 43.98±14.94y; 57.7% women) diagnosed with mTBI (Glasgow Coma Scale score, 13-15) within 6 months postinjury.</div></div><div><h3>Interventions</h3><div>Participants were randomly assigned to either a digitally monitored walking program group (structured walking ≥30min/session, ≥3times/wk, supported by a wearable fitness tracker and personalized feedback) or an active control group receiving standard exercise education.</div></div><div><h3>Main Outcome Measures</h3><div>The primary outcome was functional capacity measured by the 6-minute walk test (6MWT). Secondary outcomes included depressive symptoms (Beck Depression Inventory-II) and quality of life (QoL; World Health Organization QoL-Brief Version). Assessments were conducted at baseline and at 4, 8, and 12 weeks. Generalized estimating equations assessed between-group differences. Subgroup analyses evaluated outcomes in participants with ≥80% adherence to moderate-intensity exercise.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>The intervention group demonstrated significantly greater improvements in 6MWT distance at 4 weeks (+41.65m, <em>P</em>=.02), 8 weeks (+61.31m, <em>P</em>=.001), and 12 weeks (+65.29m, <em>P</em>=.003) compared with controls. Between-group differences in depressive symptoms and psychological QoL were not statistically significant. However, in the high adherence subgroup (≥80%), significant improvements were observed in functional capacity, as measured by the 6MWT, as well as in depressive symptoms and overall QoL.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>A 12-week digital walking exercise program significantly improved functional capacity in individuals with mTBI. Psychological health benefits were evident among those with high adherence to moderate-intensity walking. These findings support the integration of wearable technologies and remote monitoring tools into structured rehabilitation to promote functional recovery from mTBI.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":8313,"journal":{"name":"Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation","volume":"107 1","pages":"Pages 1-10"},"PeriodicalIF":3.7,"publicationDate":"2026-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144940354","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Association between weekly amount of home-visit rehabilitation and changes in activities of daily living: A retrospective cohort study using home-visit nursing station records. 每周家访康复量与日常生活活动变化的关系:一项使用家访护理站记录的回顾性队列研究。
IF 3.7 2区 医学 Q1 REHABILITATION Pub Date : 2026-01-01 DOI: 10.1016/j.apmr.2025.12.024
Hayato Tarumi, Kazuaki Uda, Jun Komiyama, Masahiko Hasegawa, Makiko Tomita, Shu Kobayashi, Nanako Tamiya

Objectives: To examine the association between average weekly minutes of home-visit rehabilitation (HR) and 6-month changes in activities of daily living (ADL) for older adults.

Design: Retrospective cohort study using anonymized electronic health record data SETTING: A total of 1,525 home-visit nursing stations across Japan.

Participants: Adults aged ≥65 years who initiated HR after April 2021 and continued for at least 6 months.

Interventions: HR categorized by average weekly duration: ≤40 min/week, 40 < min/week ≤ 60, 60 < min/week ≤ 80, and 80 < min/week ≤ 120.

Main outcome measure: Change in Barthel index (BI) score from baseline to 6 months.

Results: The analysis included 25,409 participants; the mean (SD) age was 82.9 (7.7) years, and 41.5% were males. The mean (SD) baseline BI was 68.7 (27.1). The proportion of HR duration was: ≤40 min/week (40.2%), >40-60 min/week (25.6%), >60-80 min/week (19.0%), and >80-120 min/week (15.1%). Multivariable linear regression showed significant BI improvements in the >40-60 min/week (0.30; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.05-0.54), >60-80 min/week (1.05; 95% CI, 0.78-1.32), and >80-120 min/week (1.06; 95% CI, 0.77-1.35) groups than that in the ≤40 min/week group. Among participants with care-need level 1, no significant differences were observed across groups.

Conclusions: Increased average minutes per week of HR at 6 months is associated with an improvement in BI. This result suggests that an HR of 40 min/week may be insufficient to improve ADL.

目的:探讨老年人平均每周家访康复时间(HR)与6个月日常生活活动(ADL)变化之间的关系。设计:采用匿名电子健康记录数据的回顾性队列研究设置:日本共有1525个家访护理站。参与者:年龄≥65岁的成年人,在2021年4月后开始HR治疗并持续至少6个月。干预措施:HR按平均每周持续时间分类:≤40分钟/周,40 <分钟/周≤60,60 <分钟/周≤80,80 <分钟/周≤120。主要结果测量:Barthel指数(BI)评分从基线到6个月的变化。结果:共纳入25409名受试者;平均(SD)年龄为82.9(7.7)岁,男性占41.5%。平均(SD)基线BI为68.7(27.1)。HR持续时间占比分别为:≤40 min/周(40.2%)、bbb40 ~ 60 min/周(25.6%)、>60 ~ 80 min/周(19.0%)、>80 ~ 120 min/周(15.1%)。多变量线性回归显示,>40-60分钟/周组(0.30,95%可信区间[CI], 0.05-0.54)、>60-80分钟/周组(1.05,95% CI, 0.78-1.32)和>80-120分钟/周组(1.06,95% CI, 0.77-1.35)的BI比≤40分钟/周组有显著改善。在护理需要水平为1的参与者中,各组间无显著差异。结论:6个月时每周HR平均分钟数的增加与BI的改善有关。这一结果表明,40分钟/周的心率可能不足以改善ADL。
{"title":"Association between weekly amount of home-visit rehabilitation and changes in activities of daily living: A retrospective cohort study using home-visit nursing station records.","authors":"Hayato Tarumi, Kazuaki Uda, Jun Komiyama, Masahiko Hasegawa, Makiko Tomita, Shu Kobayashi, Nanako Tamiya","doi":"10.1016/j.apmr.2025.12.024","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apmr.2025.12.024","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To examine the association between average weekly minutes of home-visit rehabilitation (HR) and 6-month changes in activities of daily living (ADL) for older adults.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Retrospective cohort study using anonymized electronic health record data SETTING: A total of 1,525 home-visit nursing stations across Japan.</p><p><strong>Participants: </strong>Adults aged ≥65 years who initiated HR after April 2021 and continued for at least 6 months.</p><p><strong>Interventions: </strong>HR categorized by average weekly duration: ≤40 min/week, 40 < min/week ≤ 60, 60 < min/week ≤ 80, and 80 < min/week ≤ 120.</p><p><strong>Main outcome measure: </strong>Change in Barthel index (BI) score from baseline to 6 months.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The analysis included 25,409 participants; the mean (SD) age was 82.9 (7.7) years, and 41.5% were males. The mean (SD) baseline BI was 68.7 (27.1). The proportion of HR duration was: ≤40 min/week (40.2%), >40-60 min/week (25.6%), >60-80 min/week (19.0%), and >80-120 min/week (15.1%). Multivariable linear regression showed significant BI improvements in the >40-60 min/week (0.30; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.05-0.54), >60-80 min/week (1.05; 95% CI, 0.78-1.32), and >80-120 min/week (1.06; 95% CI, 0.77-1.35) groups than that in the ≤40 min/week group. Among participants with care-need level 1, no significant differences were observed across groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Increased average minutes per week of HR at 6 months is associated with an improvement in BI. This result suggests that an HR of 40 min/week may be insufficient to improve ADL.</p>","PeriodicalId":8313,"journal":{"name":"Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.7,"publicationDate":"2026-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145896136","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Development and Evaluation of an Item Pool of “Movement-Related Body Functions in the Context of Task Performance” “任务表现背景下运动相关身体功能”项目库的开发与评价。
IF 3.7 2区 医学 Q1 REHABILITATION Pub Date : 2026-01-01 DOI: 10.1016/j.apmr.2025.06.009
M.J. Mulcahey PhD , Nicole M. Gerhardt OTD , Rachel Y. Kim OTD , Namrata Grampurohit PhD , Maclain Capron MPH

Objective

The study aimed to describe the development and evaluation of an item pool for a new performance-based clinical outcome assessment (COA), the Spinal Cord Injury Movement Index (SCI-MovIn).

Design

Iterative focus groups, one-on-one consultations and field-testing sessions were used to develop the conceptual model for the SCI-MovIn measurement construct, establish an item pool consisting of candidate items with 5 response categories, and create standardized guidelines for set-up, administration, and scoring. Trained therapists administered 61 items to individuals with spinal cord injury (SCI) for inter- and intrarater reliability testing.

Setting

Academic institution in an urban area.

Participants

Professionals with measurement/SCI expertise participated in focus groups. Individuals with SCI engaged in field-testing and reliability testing sessions.

Main Outcome Measure(s)

Total percent exact agreement between paired raters was calculated. Cronbach’s alpha (α) and intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) with 95% confidence interval (CI) were used to examine internal consistency. Intra- and interrater reliability were measured using ICCs.

Results

Through iterative focus groups with 18 SCI/measurement professionals and 24 field-testing sessions with 10 individuals with SCI, 226 items were developed, 132 of which were eliminated. The reliability testing sample consisted of 33 adults who sustained SCI an average of 13.2 years before participation. Of the 1215 paired scores from administration of 61 SCI-MovIn items, raters’ scores were identical for 833 (68.6%). Internal consistency was high (α=0.948). Reliability of repeated SCI-MovIn scores was high for both intrarater (ICC=0.992; CI=0.983-0.996) and interrater (ICC=0.887; CI=0.873-0.899) reliability.

Conclusion

The next step is a large-scale study to transform the item pool into a calibrated item bank from which tailored short forms can be developed.
目的:描述一种新的基于性能的临床结果评估(COA)——脊髓损伤运动指数(SCI-MovIn)的项目池的开发和评估。设计:采用迭代焦点小组、一对一咨询和现场测试等方法,开发SCI-MovIn测量结构的概念模型,建立由五个反应类别的候选项目组成的题库,并创建标准化的设置、管理和评分指南。训练有素的治疗师对脊髓损伤(SCI)患者进行了61个项目的评分间和评分内信度测试。环境:市区的学术机构。参与者:具有测量/SCI专业知识的专业人员参与焦点小组。参与现场测试和可靠性测试的SCI患者。主要结果测量:计算配对评分者之间准确一致的总百分比。采用95%置信区间(CI)的Cronbach’s alpha (α)和class内相关系数(ICC)检验内部一致性。使用icc测量评分者内部和评分者之间的信度。结果:通过18名SCI/测量专业人员的反复焦点小组和10名SCI患者的24次实地测试,共开发了226个项目,淘汰了132个项目。信度测试样本包括33名成年人,他们在参与前平均患有脊髓损伤13.2年。在61个SCI-MovIn项目的1215个配对分数中,评分者的分数相同的有833个(68.6%)。内部一致性高(α=.948)。重复SCI-MovIn评分的信度在两组评分者(ICC=)中均较高。992, CI=.983,.996)和inter-rater (ICC=。887, CI=.873,.899)信度。结论:下一步需要进行大规模的研究,将题库转化为标准的题库,从而开发出针对性的短表单。
{"title":"Development and Evaluation of an Item Pool of “Movement-Related Body Functions in the Context of Task Performance”","authors":"M.J. Mulcahey PhD ,&nbsp;Nicole M. Gerhardt OTD ,&nbsp;Rachel Y. Kim OTD ,&nbsp;Namrata Grampurohit PhD ,&nbsp;Maclain Capron MPH","doi":"10.1016/j.apmr.2025.06.009","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.apmr.2025.06.009","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><div>The study aimed to describe the development and evaluation of an item pool for a new performance-based clinical outcome assessment (COA), the Spinal Cord Injury Movement Index (SCI-MovIn).</div></div><div><h3>Design</h3><div>Iterative focus groups, one-on-one consultations and field-testing sessions were used to develop the conceptual model for the SCI-MovIn measurement construct, establish an item pool consisting of candidate items with 5 response categories, and create standardized guidelines for set-up, administration, and scoring. Trained therapists administered 61 items to individuals with spinal cord injury (SCI) for inter- and intrarater reliability testing.</div></div><div><h3>Setting</h3><div>Academic institution in an urban area.</div></div><div><h3>Participants</h3><div>Professionals with measurement/SCI expertise participated in focus groups. Individuals with SCI engaged in field-testing and reliability testing sessions.</div></div><div><h3>Main Outcome Measure(s)</h3><div>Total percent exact agreement between paired raters was calculated. Cronbach’s alpha (α) and intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) with 95% confidence interval (CI) were used to examine internal consistency. Intra- and interrater reliability were measured using ICCs.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Through iterative focus groups with 18 SCI/measurement professionals and 24 field-testing sessions with 10 individuals with SCI, 226 items were developed, 132 of which were eliminated. The reliability testing sample consisted of 33 adults who sustained SCI an average of 13.2 years before participation. Of the 1215 paired scores from administration of 61 SCI-MovIn items, raters’ scores were identical for 833 (68.6%). Internal consistency was high (α=0.948). Reliability of repeated SCI-MovIn scores was high for both intrarater (ICC=0.992; CI=0.983-0.996) and interrater (ICC=0.887; CI=0.873-0.899) reliability.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>The next step is a large-scale study to transform the item pool into a calibrated item bank from which tailored short forms can be developed.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":8313,"journal":{"name":"Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation","volume":"107 1","pages":"Pages 77-85"},"PeriodicalIF":3.7,"publicationDate":"2026-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144625303","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Archives Supplements 档案补充
IF 3.7 2区 医学 Q1 REHABILITATION Pub Date : 2026-01-01 DOI: 10.1016/S0003-9993(25)01094-9
{"title":"Archives Supplements","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/S0003-9993(25)01094-9","DOIUrl":"10.1016/S0003-9993(25)01094-9","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":8313,"journal":{"name":"Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation","volume":"107 1","pages":"Pages 150-152"},"PeriodicalIF":3.7,"publicationDate":"2026-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145852231","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Mental and Physical Well-Being of Informal Stroke Caregivers Compared With Noncaregiver Family and Friends 非正式中风照护者与非照护者家人和朋友的身心健康比较。
IF 3.7 2区 医学 Q1 REHABILITATION Pub Date : 2026-01-01 DOI: 10.1016/j.apmr.2025.06.020
Lynda D. Lisabeth PhD , Linda C. Gallo PhD , Janet Prvu Bettger ScD , Madeline Kwicklis MS , Elizabeth M. Almendarez MPH, MSSW , Erin Case BA , Melinda A. Smith DrPH , Lewis B. Morgenstern MD

Objective

To compare physical/mental health in caregivers and noncaregiver family/friends of stroke survivors within a population-based study.

Design

Study is a cohort study design with data from medical records and interviews.

Setting

Population-based stroke study in south Texas.

Participants

Stroke survivors and their informal caregivers and noncaregiver family and friends.

Interventions

Not applicable.

Main Outcome Measures

Physical/mental health measures included Patient Health Questionnaire-8 (PHQ-8; range, 0-24; higher→worse); Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System-10 physical (range, 16.2-67.7) and mental health (range, 21.2-67.6) summary scores (higher→better) at 90 days poststroke.

Results

Compared with noncaregivers (n=360), caregivers (n=320) had lower socioeconomic status, were more likely women, Mexican American, offspring rather than spouse of care recipient, and to reside with a stroke survivor. Median PHQ-8 scores were worse in caregivers (median=4; IQR, 1-8, mild) than noncaregivers (median=2; IQR, 0-5; no depression). Physical (median=47.7; IQR, 39.8-54.1; median=50.8; IQR, 44.9-57.7) and mental health (median=45.8; IQR, 41.1-50.8; median=50.8; IQR, 45.8-56.0) scores were good to very good in caregivers and noncaregivers, respectively. Caregivers had greater depression symptoms (β=1.5; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.5-2.5) and worse physical (β=−2.2; 95% CI, −4.0 to −0.4) and mental health (β=−3.2; 95% CI, −5.1 to −1.4) than noncaregivers.

Conclusions

Physical/mental health in caregivers has rarely been compared with those not in the caregiving role. In this study, which controlled for the effect of having a family member or friend with stroke, caregivers had worse physical/mental health than noncaregivers, suggesting that caregiver interventions may improve well-being.
目的:在一项基于人群的研究中,比较中风幸存者的照顾者和非照顾者家庭/朋友的身体/心理健康状况。设计:研究采用队列研究设计,数据来自医疗记录和访谈。背景:基于人群的中风研究,在Nueces县,德克萨斯州。参与者:中风幸存者和他们的非正式照顾者和非照顾者的家人和朋友。干预措施:不适用。主要结局指标:身心健康指标包括患者健康问卷-8 (PHQ-8,范围0-24,高→差);卒中后90天的身体(16.2-67.7)和心理健康(21.2-67.6)综合评分(高→好)。结果:与非照护者(n=360)相比,照护者(n=320)的社会经济地位较低,更有可能是女性、墨西哥裔美国人、照护者的后代而不是配偶,并且与中风幸存者住在一起。照顾者的PHQ-8得分中位数(中位数=4,IQR:1-8,轻度)低于非照顾者(中位数=2,IQR:0-5,无抑郁)。生理(中位数=47.7,IQR:39.8,54.1;中位数=50.8,IQR:44.9,57.7)和心理健康(中位数=45.8,IQR:41.1,50.8;中位数=50.8,IQR:45.8,56.0),照顾者和非照顾者的评分分别为好到非常好。照顾者有更大的抑郁症状(β=1.5, 95% CI:0.5-2.5)和更差的身体(β=-2.2, 95% CI:-4.0,-0.4)和心理健康(β=-3.2, 95% CI:-5.1,-1.4)比非照顾者。结论:很少将照护者的身心健康与非照护者进行比较。在这项研究中,控制了有家庭成员或朋友中风的影响,照顾者的身体/心理健康状况比非照顾者更差,这表明照顾者的干预可能会改善幸福感。
{"title":"Mental and Physical Well-Being of Informal Stroke Caregivers Compared With Noncaregiver Family and Friends","authors":"Lynda D. Lisabeth PhD ,&nbsp;Linda C. Gallo PhD ,&nbsp;Janet Prvu Bettger ScD ,&nbsp;Madeline Kwicklis MS ,&nbsp;Elizabeth M. Almendarez MPH, MSSW ,&nbsp;Erin Case BA ,&nbsp;Melinda A. Smith DrPH ,&nbsp;Lewis B. Morgenstern MD","doi":"10.1016/j.apmr.2025.06.020","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.apmr.2025.06.020","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><div>To compare physical/mental health in caregivers and noncaregiver family/friends of stroke survivors within a population-based study.</div></div><div><h3>Design</h3><div>Study is a cohort study design with data from medical records and interviews.</div></div><div><h3>Setting</h3><div>Population-based stroke study in south Texas.</div></div><div><h3>Participants</h3><div>Stroke survivors and their informal caregivers and noncaregiver family and friends.</div></div><div><h3>Interventions</h3><div>Not applicable.</div></div><div><h3>Main Outcome Measures</h3><div>Physical/mental health measures included Patient Health Questionnaire-8 (PHQ-8; range, 0-24; higher→worse); Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System-10 physical (range, 16.2-67.7) and mental health (range, 21.2-67.6) summary scores (higher→better) at 90 days poststroke.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Compared with noncaregivers (n=360), caregivers (n=320) had lower socioeconomic status, were more likely women, Mexican American, offspring rather than spouse of care recipient, and to reside with a stroke survivor. Median PHQ-8 scores were worse in caregivers (median=4; IQR, 1-8, mild) than noncaregivers (median=2; IQR, 0-5; no depression). Physical (median=47.7; IQR, 39.8-54.1; median=50.8; IQR, 44.9-57.7) and mental health (median=45.8; IQR, 41.1-50.8; median=50.8; IQR, 45.8-56.0) scores were good to very good in caregivers and noncaregivers, respectively. Caregivers had greater depression symptoms (β=1.5; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.5-2.5) and worse physical (β=−2.2; 95% CI, −4.0 to −0.4) and mental health (β=−3.2; 95% CI, −5.1 to −1.4) than noncaregivers.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Physical/mental health in caregivers has rarely been compared with those not in the caregiving role. In this study, which controlled for the effect of having a family member or friend with stroke, caregivers had worse physical/mental health than noncaregivers, suggesting that caregiver interventions may improve well-being.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":8313,"journal":{"name":"Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation","volume":"107 1","pages":"Pages 51-58"},"PeriodicalIF":3.7,"publicationDate":"2026-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144673854","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Psychological Transdiagnostic Processes in Mild Traumatic Brain Injury Recovery: A Scoping Review 轻度创伤性脑损伤恢复的心理诊断过程:范围综述。
IF 3.7 2区 医学 Q1 REHABILITATION Pub Date : 2026-01-01 DOI: 10.1016/j.apmr.2025.07.014
Caitlin Courchesne MSc , Medha Amarnath Nair MA , Marc Gelineau BA , Liam McCloskey BA , Josh Faulkner PhD , Molly Cairncross PhD

Objectives

To examine the extent to which psychological transdiagnostic processes have been investigated in relation to mild traumatic brain injury (mTBI) recovery outcomes, summarize methodological approaches, and evaluate consistency among transdiagnostic processes and outcome measures.

Data Sources

Five databases (Ovid MEDLINE, PsycINFO, Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature, Scopus, and Web of Science) were searched from inception to October 2024. Eleven transdiagnostic processes were identified for inclusion based on a review of existing systematic reviews and meta-analyses establishing transdiagnostic relevance across a range of psychological disorders: attentional bias, avoidance, emotion regulation, flexibility, interpretation bias, intolerance of uncertainty, neuroticism, perfectionism, repetitive negative thinking, self-discrepancy, and shame.

Study Selection

Peer-reviewed, empirical studies published in English were included if they involved human participants with mTBI predominantly aged ≥18 years and reported ≥1 association between a transdiagnostic process and an mTBI recovery outcome.

Data Extraction

Three reviewers extracted data on study design, sample characteristics, transdiagnostic processes and their associated mTBI outcome measures, and analytical approaches using a standardized extraction form.

Data Synthesis

Sixty-seven studies published between 1995 and 2024 were included, yielding 118 transdiagnostic process–outcome associations. Avoidance (29%), flexibility (29%), and interpretation bias (25%) were the most frequently investigated transdiagnostic processes; symptom severity (36%) and disability (18%) were the most frequently reported outcomes. No studies examined associations involving attentional bias, emotion regulation, or perfectionism. Substantial heterogeneity in transdiagnostic processes and outcome measurement was observed. While most studies employed quantitative analysis methods, qualitative approaches uniquely captured less represented transdiagnostic process–outcome associations (eg, intolerance of uncertainty, self-discrepancy, shame).

Conclusions

Although interest in transdiagnostic processes and mTBI recovery is growing, current investigations are centered on a narrow range of psychological constructs. Broader investigation of transdiagnostic processes known to maintain psychopathology and greater methodological consistency are needed.
目的:研究心理跨诊断过程(TPs)与轻度创伤性脑损伤(mTBI)恢复结果的关系,总结方法方法,并评估TP和结果测量之间的一致性。数据来源:检索5个数据库(Ovid MEDLINE、PsycINFO、CINAHL、Scopus和Web of Science),检索时间从成立到2024年10月。通过对现有的系统综述和荟萃分析的回顾,确定了11个tp,并在一系列心理障碍中建立了跨诊断相关性:注意偏差、回避、情绪调节、灵活性、解释偏差、对不确定性的不容忍、神经质、完美主义、重复性消极思维、自我差异和羞耻。研究选择:同行评议的、以英文发表的实证研究被纳入,如果这些研究涉及年龄主要≥18岁的mTBI患者,并且报告TP与mTBI恢复结果之间至少有一种关联。数据提取:三位审稿人使用标准化的提取表格提取研究设计、样本特征、TPs及其相关mTBI结果测量和分析方法的数据。数据综合:纳入了1995年至2024年间发表的67项研究,得出118个tp结局关联。回避(29%)、灵活性(29%)和解释偏差(25%)是最常被调查的TPs;症状严重(36%)和残疾(18%)是最常见的报道结果。没有研究调查了与注意偏差、情绪调节或完美主义有关的关联。观察到TP和结果测量的实质性异质性。虽然大多数研究采用定量分析方法,但定性方法独特地捕获了较少代表性的tp -结果关联(例如,对不确定性的不容忍、自我差异、羞耻)。结论:尽管对TPs和mTBI恢复的兴趣越来越大,但目前的研究主要集中在狭窄的心理结构上。需要对已知维持精神病理的TPs进行更广泛的调查和更大的方法一致性。
{"title":"Psychological Transdiagnostic Processes in Mild Traumatic Brain Injury Recovery: A Scoping Review","authors":"Caitlin Courchesne MSc ,&nbsp;Medha Amarnath Nair MA ,&nbsp;Marc Gelineau BA ,&nbsp;Liam McCloskey BA ,&nbsp;Josh Faulkner PhD ,&nbsp;Molly Cairncross PhD","doi":"10.1016/j.apmr.2025.07.014","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.apmr.2025.07.014","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objectives</h3><div>To examine the extent to which psychological transdiagnostic processes have been investigated in relation to mild traumatic brain injury (mTBI) recovery outcomes, summarize methodological approaches, and evaluate consistency among transdiagnostic processes and outcome measures.</div></div><div><h3>Data Sources</h3><div>Five databases (Ovid MEDLINE, PsycINFO, Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature, Scopus, and Web of Science) were searched from inception to October 2024. Eleven transdiagnostic processes were identified for inclusion based on a review of existing systematic reviews and meta-analyses establishing transdiagnostic relevance across a range of psychological disorders: attentional bias, avoidance, emotion regulation, flexibility, interpretation bias, intolerance of uncertainty, neuroticism, perfectionism, repetitive negative thinking, self-discrepancy, and shame.</div></div><div><h3>Study Selection</h3><div>Peer-reviewed, empirical studies published in English were included if they involved human participants with mTBI predominantly aged ≥18 years and reported ≥1 association between a transdiagnostic process and an mTBI recovery outcome.</div></div><div><h3>Data Extraction</h3><div>Three reviewers extracted data on study design, sample characteristics, transdiagnostic processes and their associated mTBI outcome measures, and analytical approaches using a standardized extraction form.</div></div><div><h3>Data Synthesis</h3><div>Sixty-seven studies published between 1995 and 2024 were included, yielding 118 transdiagnostic process–outcome associations. Avoidance (29%), flexibility (29%), and interpretation bias (25%) were the most frequently investigated transdiagnostic processes; symptom severity (36%) and disability (18%) were the most frequently reported outcomes. No studies examined associations involving attentional bias, emotion regulation, or perfectionism. Substantial heterogeneity in transdiagnostic processes and outcome measurement was observed. While most studies employed quantitative analysis methods, qualitative approaches uniquely captured less represented transdiagnostic process–outcome associations (eg, intolerance of uncertainty, self-discrepancy, shame).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Although interest in transdiagnostic processes and mTBI recovery is growing, current investigations are centered on a narrow range of psychological constructs. Broader investigation of transdiagnostic processes known to maintain psychopathology and greater methodological consistency are needed.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":8313,"journal":{"name":"Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation","volume":"107 1","pages":"Pages 86-104"},"PeriodicalIF":3.7,"publicationDate":"2026-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144798040","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Ed Board page 教育版面
IF 3.7 2区 医学 Q1 REHABILITATION Pub Date : 2026-01-01 DOI: 10.1016/S0003-9993(25)01078-0
{"title":"Ed Board page","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/S0003-9993(25)01078-0","DOIUrl":"10.1016/S0003-9993(25)01078-0","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":8313,"journal":{"name":"Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation","volume":"107 1","pages":"Page A2"},"PeriodicalIF":3.7,"publicationDate":"2026-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145852367","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Guiding Technology Adoption in Rehabilitation: A Framework From the Rehabilitation Technology Implementation for Promising Solutions (Rehab TIPS) Workgroup 指导康复技术的应用:康复技术实施前景解决方案(康复TIPS)工作小组的框架。
IF 3.7 2区 医学 Q1 REHABILITATION Pub Date : 2026-01-01 DOI: 10.1016/j.apmr.2025.08.008
Michelle R. Rauzi DPT, ATC, PhD , Swapna Balakrishnan DPT , Sheryl M. Flynn PT, PhD , Julie J. Keysor PT, PhD , Helen M. Hoenig MD, MPH
There is an unprecedented growth in health and rehabilitation technologies influencing service delivery. Although adopting emergent or existent technologies may add value to rehabilitation services and outcomes, clinicians face uncertainties on whether and how to adopt new technologies. Because of these challenges, rehabilitation stakeholders need to be active agents in the development, adoption, and ongoing evaluation of a given technology’s effect. This special communication presents the Rehabilitation Technology Implementation for Promising Solutions (Rehab TIPS) Framework. This Framework, designed by the multidisciplinary Rehab TIPS workgroup, integrates established theories toward guiding rehabilitation clinicians in a systematic process of selecting and adopting valuable technologies. This special communication details the underlying models that informed the Rehab TIPS Framework. Then, the 2 components of the Rehab TIPS Framework are outlined: (1) a decision-making process to guide the selection of appropriate technologies for adoption, and (2) the 3 phases of technology adoption by individuals within a socioecological context. Finally, we discuss how the Rehab TIPS Framework can be used in the rehabilitation field, including future directions for advancing the science and practice of technology adoption in rehabilitation.
影响服务提供的保健和康复技术出现了前所未有的增长。虽然采用新兴或现有的技术可能会增加康复服务和结果的价值,但临床医生面临是否以及如何采用新技术的不确定性。由于存在这些挑战,康复利益相关者需要积极参与特定技术影响的开发、采用和持续评估。本特别通讯介绍了有希望解决方案的康复技术实施(康复TIPS)框架。该框架由多学科康复TIPS工作组设计,整合了现有的理论,指导康复临床医生在系统的过程中选择和采用有价值的技术。这种特殊的通信详细说明了告知康复TIPS框架的底层模型。然后,概述了康复TIPS框架的两个组成部分:1)指导选择适当技术的决策过程,以及2)在社会生态背景下个人采用技术的三个阶段。最后,我们讨论了如何将康复TIPS框架应用于康复领域,包括推进康复技术应用的科学和实践的未来方向。
{"title":"Guiding Technology Adoption in Rehabilitation: A Framework From the Rehabilitation Technology Implementation for Promising Solutions (Rehab TIPS) Workgroup","authors":"Michelle R. Rauzi DPT, ATC, PhD ,&nbsp;Swapna Balakrishnan DPT ,&nbsp;Sheryl M. Flynn PT, PhD ,&nbsp;Julie J. Keysor PT, PhD ,&nbsp;Helen M. Hoenig MD, MPH","doi":"10.1016/j.apmr.2025.08.008","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.apmr.2025.08.008","url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>There is an unprecedented growth in health and rehabilitation technologies influencing service delivery. Although adopting emergent or existent technologies may add value to rehabilitation services and outcomes, clinicians face uncertainties on whether and how to adopt new technologies. Because of these challenges, rehabilitation stakeholders need to be active agents in the development, adoption, and ongoing evaluation of a given technology’s effect. This special communication presents the Rehabilitation Technology Implementation for Promising Solutions (Rehab TIPS) Framework. This Framework, designed by the multidisciplinary Rehab TIPS workgroup, integrates established theories toward guiding rehabilitation clinicians in a systematic process of selecting and adopting valuable technologies. This special communication details the underlying models that informed the Rehab TIPS Framework. Then, the 2 components of the Rehab TIPS Framework are outlined: (1) a decision-making process to guide the selection of appropriate technologies for adoption, and (2) the 3 phases of technology adoption by individuals within a socioecological context. Finally, we discuss how the Rehab TIPS Framework can be used in the rehabilitation field, including future directions for advancing the science and practice of technology adoption in rehabilitation.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":8313,"journal":{"name":"Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation","volume":"107 1","pages":"Pages 123-133"},"PeriodicalIF":3.7,"publicationDate":"2026-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144939746","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Domains, Trends, and Uptake of Common Data Elements in Intervention Studies Focused on Recovery of Consciousness in Severe Brain Injury From 1986 to 2020: A Scoping Review 1986年至2020年重度脑损伤患者意识恢复干预研究的领域、趋势和共同数据元素的吸收:范围综述
IF 3.7 2区 医学 Q1 REHABILITATION Pub Date : 2026-01-01 DOI: 10.1016/j.apmr.2025.07.021
Jennifer A. Weaver PhD, OTR/L , Alison M. Cogan PhD , Vera Pertsovskaya MD , Parie Bhandari MPH , Bint-e Z. Awan BA , Sara Lewis MS, OTR/L , Angela Hartman OTD, OTR/L , Kristen Maisano OTD, MAEd , Tom Harrod MLIS , Theresa L. Bender Pape DrPH , Trudy Mallinson PhD , Recovery of Consciousness Study Team

Objective

To evaluate the range and typology of primary clinical outcome assessments used in intervention studies promoting recovery of consciousness for patients with disorders of consciousness. A secondary aim was to examine the extent to which the introduction of common data elements (CDE) has reduced the heterogeneity of primary clinical outcome assessments in studies that include participants with disorders of consciousness.

Data Sources

We searched for articles across 5 databases including Cochrane, Embase, PsycInfo, PubMed, and Scopus.

Study Selection

We selected articles that focused on facilitating recovery of consciousness among adults with disorders of consciousness after severe traumatic brain injury.

Data Extraction

We extracted the study year, primary clinical outcome assessment, and funding source.

Data Synthesis

We classified the primary clinical outcome by International Classification of Functioning, Disability, and Health domain and CDE status. A total of 75 primary clinical outcome assessments were extracted from 306 included articles representing 307 studies; 45 primary clinical outcome assessments (60%) aligned with the International Classification of Functioning, Disability, and Health Body Function domain. The proportion of articles with US federal funding that reported a CDE as the clinical outcome assessment did not differ by year published.

Conclusions

Implementation of CDEs in 2010 did not substantively change the utilization of clinical outcome assessments that are CDEs because these were already more likely to be reported than non-CDEs. Overall, the wide variation in primary clinical outcome assessments used in intervention studies facilitating recovery of consciousness limits the ability to conduct meta-analyses, which are needed to increase the strength of evidence for disorders of consciousness interventions.
目的:我们的范围综述的主要目的是评估用于促进意识障碍(DoC)患者意识恢复的干预研究的主要临床结果评估的范围和类型。第二个目的是检查引入公共数据元素(CDE)在多大程度上降低了DoC研究中主要临床结果评估的异质性。数据来源:我们搜索了五个数据库中的文章:Cochrane、Embase、PsycInfo、PubMed和Scopus。研究选择:我们选择了关注于促进严重创伤性脑损伤后成人DoC患者意识恢复的文章。资料提取:我们提取了研究年份、主要临床结果评估和资金来源。数据综合:我们根据国际功能、残疾和健康分类(ICF)领域和CDE状态对主要临床结局进行分类。从307篇纳入的文章中提取了75项主要临床结局评估;45项主要临床结果评估(60%)与ICF机体功能域一致。在美国联邦资助的文章中,将CDE作为临床结果评估的比例在发表年份之间没有差异。结论:2010年CDEs的实施并没有实质性地改变CDEs临床结果评估的使用,因为这些已经比非CDEs更有可能被报道。总的来说,促进意识恢复的干预研究中使用的主要临床结果评估差异很大,限制了进行meta分析的能力,而meta分析是增加DoC干预证据强度所必需的。
{"title":"Domains, Trends, and Uptake of Common Data Elements in Intervention Studies Focused on Recovery of Consciousness in Severe Brain Injury From 1986 to 2020: A Scoping Review","authors":"Jennifer A. Weaver PhD, OTR/L ,&nbsp;Alison M. Cogan PhD ,&nbsp;Vera Pertsovskaya MD ,&nbsp;Parie Bhandari MPH ,&nbsp;Bint-e Z. Awan BA ,&nbsp;Sara Lewis MS, OTR/L ,&nbsp;Angela Hartman OTD, OTR/L ,&nbsp;Kristen Maisano OTD, MAEd ,&nbsp;Tom Harrod MLIS ,&nbsp;Theresa L. Bender Pape DrPH ,&nbsp;Trudy Mallinson PhD ,&nbsp;Recovery of Consciousness Study Team","doi":"10.1016/j.apmr.2025.07.021","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.apmr.2025.07.021","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><div>To evaluate the range and typology of primary clinical outcome assessments used in intervention studies promoting recovery of consciousness for patients with disorders of consciousness. A secondary aim was to examine the extent to which the introduction of common data elements (CDE) has reduced the heterogeneity of primary clinical outcome assessments in studies that include participants with disorders of consciousness.</div></div><div><h3>Data Sources</h3><div>We searched for articles across 5 databases including Cochrane, Embase, PsycInfo, PubMed, and Scopus.</div></div><div><h3>Study Selection</h3><div>We selected articles that focused on facilitating recovery of consciousness among adults with disorders of consciousness after severe traumatic brain injury.</div></div><div><h3>Data Extraction</h3><div>We extracted the study year, primary clinical outcome assessment, and funding source.</div></div><div><h3>Data Synthesis</h3><div>We classified the primary clinical outcome by International Classification of Functioning, Disability, and Health domain and CDE status. A total of 75 primary clinical outcome assessments were extracted from 306 included articles representing 307 studies; 45 primary clinical outcome assessments (60%) aligned with the International Classification of Functioning, Disability, and Health Body Function domain. The proportion of articles with US federal funding that reported a CDE as the clinical outcome assessment did not differ by year published.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Implementation of CDEs in 2010 did not substantively change the utilization of clinical outcome assessments that are CDEs because these were already more likely to be reported than non-CDEs. Overall, the wide variation in primary clinical outcome assessments used in intervention studies facilitating recovery of consciousness limits the ability to conduct meta-analyses, which are needed to increase the strength of evidence for disorders of consciousness interventions.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":8313,"journal":{"name":"Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation","volume":"107 1","pages":"Pages 105-122"},"PeriodicalIF":3.7,"publicationDate":"2026-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144940364","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Action observation and motor imagery during hand immobilization period accelerate motor and functional recovery in patients with surgical fixation for distal radial fractures: a randomized controlled trial. 一项随机对照试验:手部固定期间的动作观察和运动成像加速桡骨远端骨折手术固定患者的运动和功能恢复。
IF 3.7 2区 医学 Q1 REHABILITATION Pub Date : 2025-12-31 DOI: 10.1016/j.apmr.2025.12.015
Scandelli Francesco, Temporiti Federico, Vecchi Simona, Manes Niccolò, Pozzi Alessandro, Rajevich Luca, Pivato Giorgio, Gatti Roberto

Objective: To investigate the effects of an action observation (AO) and motor imagery (MI) training compared to standard care pathway on motor and functional recovery in patients with surgical fixation after distal radial fractures (DRF).

Design: Two-armed single-blind randomized controlled trial.

Setting: Outpatient hand rehabilitation Unit.

Participants: Forty right-handed participants who underwent surgical fixation for right DRF.

Interventions: Participants allocated to AOMI group performed an AO and MI training during immobilization period, while participants allocated to control group followed a routinary care pathway. Both groups performed a 5-week rehabilitation program after immobilization end.

Main outcome and measures: Primary outcome was hand dexterity (Purdue Pegboard Test - PPT). Secondary outcomes were active range-of-motion, pinch and grip strength and hand function (Patient-Rated Wrist/Hand Evaluation - PRWHE). Outcomes were assessed at immobilization end, after a 5-week rehabilitation program and at 6-month follow-up.

Results: AOMI group revealed better R-task score of the PPT (mean difference 1.9, CI95 0.8,3.0), PRWHE-pain (median difference -6.0 CI95 -11.0,-1.0) and PRWHE-specific-activity (median difference -10.0 CI95 -18.0,-2.0) sub-scores and total PRWHE score (median difference -12.8 CI95 -23.8,-4.0) compared to Control group at physiotherapy program end. Moreover, AOMI group revealed higher pinch and grip strength than Control group at immobilization end (median difference: grip 4.6 CI95 2.0,7.7; pinch 1.9 CI95 0.3,3.2).

Conclusions: AO and MI during the immobilization period accelerated the recovery of hand dexterity and function in patients with surgical fixation for DRF. These findings suggested the incorporation of AO and MI in the care pathway of patients undergoing immobilization after surgery for DRF.

目的:探讨与标准护理途径相比,动作观察(AO)和运动想象(MI)训练对桡骨远端骨折(DRF)手术固定患者运动和功能恢复的影响。设计:双臂单盲随机对照试验。环境:门诊手部康复科。参与者:40名右撇子接受右DRF手术固定的参与者。干预措施:分配到AOMI组的参与者在固定期间进行AO和MI训练,而分配到对照组的参与者则遵循常规护理途径。两组均在固定结束后进行5周的康复计划。主要观察指标:主要观察指标为手灵巧度(普渡钉板测试- PPT)。次要结果是活动范围、捏握力量和手功能(患者评定腕/手评估- PRWHE)。结果评估在固定结束后,5周的康复计划和6个月的随访。结果:AOMI组在物理治疗方案结束时PPT r -任务评分(平均差1.9,CI95 0.8,3.0)、PRWHE疼痛(中位数差-6.0,CI95 -11.0,-1.0)、PRWHE特异性活性(中位数差-10.0,CI95 -18.0,-2.0)子评分和PRWHE总评分(中位数差-12.8,CI95 -23.8,-4.0)均优于对照组。此外,AOMI组在固定结束时的捏握力和握力均高于对照组(中位差:握力4.6 CI95 2.0,7.7;捏力1.9 CI95 0.3,3.2)。结论:固定期间的AO和MI加速了DRF手术固定患者手部灵巧性和功能的恢复。这些发现表明,在DRF术后固定患者的护理途径中,AO和MI的结合。
{"title":"Action observation and motor imagery during hand immobilization period accelerate motor and functional recovery in patients with surgical fixation for distal radial fractures: a randomized controlled trial.","authors":"Scandelli Francesco, Temporiti Federico, Vecchi Simona, Manes Niccolò, Pozzi Alessandro, Rajevich Luca, Pivato Giorgio, Gatti Roberto","doi":"10.1016/j.apmr.2025.12.015","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apmr.2025.12.015","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To investigate the effects of an action observation (AO) and motor imagery (MI) training compared to standard care pathway on motor and functional recovery in patients with surgical fixation after distal radial fractures (DRF).</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Two-armed single-blind randomized controlled trial.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>Outpatient hand rehabilitation Unit.</p><p><strong>Participants: </strong>Forty right-handed participants who underwent surgical fixation for right DRF.</p><p><strong>Interventions: </strong>Participants allocated to AOMI group performed an AO and MI training during immobilization period, while participants allocated to control group followed a routinary care pathway. Both groups performed a 5-week rehabilitation program after immobilization end.</p><p><strong>Main outcome and measures: </strong>Primary outcome was hand dexterity (Purdue Pegboard Test - PPT). Secondary outcomes were active range-of-motion, pinch and grip strength and hand function (Patient-Rated Wrist/Hand Evaluation - PRWHE). Outcomes were assessed at immobilization end, after a 5-week rehabilitation program and at 6-month follow-up.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>AOMI group revealed better R-task score of the PPT (mean difference 1.9, CI<sub>95</sub> 0.8,3.0), PRWHE-pain (median difference -6.0 CI<sub>95</sub> -11.0,-1.0) and PRWHE-specific-activity (median difference -10.0 CI<sub>95</sub> -18.0,-2.0) sub-scores and total PRWHE score (median difference -12.8 CI<sub>95</sub> -23.8,-4.0) compared to Control group at physiotherapy program end. Moreover, AOMI group revealed higher pinch and grip strength than Control group at immobilization end (median difference: grip 4.6 CI<sub>95</sub> 2.0,7.7; pinch 1.9 CI<sub>95</sub> 0.3,3.2).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>AO and MI during the immobilization period accelerated the recovery of hand dexterity and function in patients with surgical fixation for DRF. These findings suggested the incorporation of AO and MI in the care pathway of patients undergoing immobilization after surgery for DRF.</p>","PeriodicalId":8313,"journal":{"name":"Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.7,"publicationDate":"2025-12-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145892018","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
期刊
Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation
全部 Acc. Chem. Res. ACS Applied Bio Materials ACS Appl. Electron. Mater. ACS Appl. Energy Mater. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces ACS Appl. Nano Mater. ACS Appl. Polym. Mater. ACS BIOMATER-SCI ENG ACS Catal. ACS Cent. Sci. ACS Chem. Biol. ACS Chemical Health & Safety ACS Chem. Neurosci. ACS Comb. Sci. ACS Earth Space Chem. ACS Energy Lett. ACS Infect. Dis. ACS Macro Lett. ACS Mater. Lett. ACS Med. Chem. Lett. ACS Nano ACS Omega ACS Photonics ACS Sens. ACS Sustainable Chem. Eng. ACS Synth. Biol. Anal. Chem. BIOCHEMISTRY-US Bioconjugate Chem. BIOMACROMOLECULES Chem. Res. Toxicol. Chem. Rev. Chem. Mater. CRYST GROWTH DES ENERG FUEL Environ. Sci. Technol. Environ. Sci. Technol. Lett. Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. IND ENG CHEM RES Inorg. Chem. J. Agric. Food. Chem. J. Chem. Eng. Data J. Chem. Educ. J. Chem. Inf. Model. J. Chem. Theory Comput. J. Med. Chem. J. Nat. Prod. J PROTEOME RES J. Am. Chem. Soc. LANGMUIR MACROMOLECULES Mol. Pharmaceutics Nano Lett. Org. Lett. ORG PROCESS RES DEV ORGANOMETALLICS J. Org. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. A J. Phys. Chem. B J. Phys. Chem. C J. Phys. Chem. Lett. Analyst Anal. Methods Biomater. Sci. Catal. Sci. Technol. Chem. Commun. Chem. Soc. Rev. CHEM EDUC RES PRACT CRYSTENGCOMM Dalton Trans. Energy Environ. Sci. ENVIRON SCI-NANO ENVIRON SCI-PROC IMP ENVIRON SCI-WAT RES Faraday Discuss. Food Funct. Green Chem. Inorg. Chem. Front. Integr. Biol. J. Anal. At. Spectrom. J. Mater. Chem. A J. Mater. Chem. B J. Mater. Chem. C Lab Chip Mater. Chem. Front. Mater. Horiz. MEDCHEMCOMM Metallomics Mol. Biosyst. Mol. Syst. Des. Eng. Nanoscale Nanoscale Horiz. Nat. Prod. Rep. New J. Chem. Org. Biomol. Chem. Org. Chem. Front. PHOTOCH PHOTOBIO SCI PCCP Polym. Chem.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1