Objectives: To examine the association between average weekly minutes of home-visit rehabilitation (HR) and 6-month changes in activities of daily living (ADL) for older adults.
Design: Retrospective cohort study using anonymized electronic health record data SETTING: A total of 1,525 home-visit nursing stations across Japan.
Participants: Adults aged ≥65 years who initiated HR after April 2021 and continued for at least 6 months.
Interventions: HR categorized by average weekly duration: ≤40 min/week, 40 < min/week ≤ 60, 60 < min/week ≤ 80, and 80 < min/week ≤ 120.
Main outcome measure: Change in Barthel index (BI) score from baseline to 6 months.
Results: The analysis included 25,409 participants; the mean (SD) age was 82.9 (7.7) years, and 41.5% were males. The mean (SD) baseline BI was 68.7 (27.1). The proportion of HR duration was: ≤40 min/week (40.2%), >40-60 min/week (25.6%), >60-80 min/week (19.0%), and >80-120 min/week (15.1%). Multivariable linear regression showed significant BI improvements in the >40-60 min/week (0.30; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.05-0.54), >60-80 min/week (1.05; 95% CI, 0.78-1.32), and >80-120 min/week (1.06; 95% CI, 0.77-1.35) groups than that in the ≤40 min/week group. Among participants with care-need level 1, no significant differences were observed across groups.
Conclusions: Increased average minutes per week of HR at 6 months is associated with an improvement in BI. This result suggests that an HR of 40 min/week may be insufficient to improve ADL.
Objective: To investigate the effects of an action observation (AO) and motor imagery (MI) training compared to standard care pathway on motor and functional recovery in patients with surgical fixation after distal radial fractures (DRF).
Design: Two-armed single-blind randomized controlled trial.
Setting: Outpatient hand rehabilitation Unit.
Participants: Forty right-handed participants who underwent surgical fixation for right DRF.
Interventions: Participants allocated to AOMI group performed an AO and MI training during immobilization period, while participants allocated to control group followed a routinary care pathway. Both groups performed a 5-week rehabilitation program after immobilization end.
Main outcome and measures: Primary outcome was hand dexterity (Purdue Pegboard Test - PPT). Secondary outcomes were active range-of-motion, pinch and grip strength and hand function (Patient-Rated Wrist/Hand Evaluation - PRWHE). Outcomes were assessed at immobilization end, after a 5-week rehabilitation program and at 6-month follow-up.
Results: AOMI group revealed better R-task score of the PPT (mean difference 1.9, CI95 0.8,3.0), PRWHE-pain (median difference -6.0 CI95 -11.0,-1.0) and PRWHE-specific-activity (median difference -10.0 CI95 -18.0,-2.0) sub-scores and total PRWHE score (median difference -12.8 CI95 -23.8,-4.0) compared to Control group at physiotherapy program end. Moreover, AOMI group revealed higher pinch and grip strength than Control group at immobilization end (median difference: grip 4.6 CI95 2.0,7.7; pinch 1.9 CI95 0.3,3.2).
Conclusions: AO and MI during the immobilization period accelerated the recovery of hand dexterity and function in patients with surgical fixation for DRF. These findings suggested the incorporation of AO and MI in the care pathway of patients undergoing immobilization after surgery for DRF.

