{"title":"Misplaced Priorities: The Utah Digital Signature Act and Liability Allocation in a Public Key Infrastructure","authors":"Brad Biddle","doi":"10.31228/osf.io/h2dj5","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.31228/osf.io/h2dj5","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":83257,"journal":{"name":"The San Diego law review","volume":"10 1","pages":"1143"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"1996-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"69639642","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
This Article discusses the propriety of granting political asylum to Chinese citizens fleeing China's coercive population control policy. It argues that China is persecuting some of its citizens through its population control policy and that the United States should grant asylum to those who have been persecuted or who have a genuine fear of future persecution.
{"title":"Forced abortions and involuntary sterilization in China: are the victims of coercive population control measures eligible for asylum in the United States?","authors":"T A Brown","doi":"","DOIUrl":"","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This Article discusses the propriety of granting political asylum to Chinese citizens fleeing China's coercive population control policy. It argues that China is persecuting some of its citizens through its population control policy and that the United States should grant asylum to those who have been persecuted or who have a genuine fear of future persecution.</p>","PeriodicalId":83257,"journal":{"name":"The San Diego law review","volume":"32 3","pages":"745-69"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"1995-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"25236867","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"The Right to Jury Trial in Complex Civil Litigation","authors":"T. Pivonka","doi":"10.2307/1340558","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.2307/1340558","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":83257,"journal":{"name":"The San Diego law review","volume":"16 1","pages":"1003"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"1979-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.2307/1340558","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"68323548","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
When we speak of the “Enlightenment,” those of us who are not Buddhists commonly refer to a complex movement of thought, culture, temperament, and politics represented in its early phases by thinkers like Descartes and Locke and in its later phases by figures like Kant or, in America, Jefferson and Paine. This self-styled “Age of Reason,” or what we might call the “historical” or “classical” Enlightenment, is often said to have succumbed in the nineteenth century to the forces of reaction and romanticism. But “the Enlightenment” is also invoked, most often by or on behalf of modern liberal political and constitutional theorists, to designate a sort of political-moral ideal that ostensibly has guided and continues to guide American constitutionalism. This more modern iteration is supposed to be connected to the historical Enlightenment, it seems, mainly on the basis of a professed allegiance to governance by “reason.”
{"title":"Recovering (From) Enlightenment","authors":"S. Smith","doi":"10.2139/SSRN.449060","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.2139/SSRN.449060","url":null,"abstract":"When we speak of the “Enlightenment,” those of us who are not Buddhists commonly refer to a complex movement of thought, culture, temperament, and politics represented in its early phases by thinkers like Descartes and Locke and in its later phases by figures like Kant or, in America, Jefferson and Paine. This self-styled “Age of Reason,” or what we might call the “historical” or “classical” Enlightenment, is often said to have succumbed in the nineteenth century to the forces of reaction and romanticism. But “the Enlightenment” is also invoked, most often by or on behalf of modern liberal political and constitutional theorists, to designate a sort of political-moral ideal that ostensibly has guided and continues to guide American constitutionalism. This more modern iteration is supposed to be connected to the historical Enlightenment, it seems, mainly on the basis of a professed allegiance to governance by “reason.”","PeriodicalId":83257,"journal":{"name":"The San Diego law review","volume":"41 1","pages":"13-55"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"68792925","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
扫码关注我们
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：
京公网安备 11010802042870号