Pub Date : 2025-02-20DOI: 10.1007/s00737-025-01571-4
Megan Howard, Alison N. Goulding, Anitha Muddana, Terri L. Fletcher, Nicole Cirino, Alison M. Stuebe
This study sought to determine prevalence of Dysphoric Milk Ejection Reflex (D-MER) and mental health correlates in a cohort of patients from a breastfeeding medicine clinic. We determined prevalence of D-MER symptoms and performed bivariate analyses to explore associations between D-MER symptoms, demographics, and self-reported mental health history. Among 271 patients, 42 (15.5%) reported D-MER. Women with D-MER symptoms were more likely to report a history of panic attacks (28.6 vs. 12.2%, OR 2.87, 95% CI 1.23–6.25).
本研究旨在确定来自母乳喂养医学诊所的一组患者中不安性泌乳反射(D-MER)的患病率和心理健康相关因素。我们确定了D-MER症状的患病率,并进行了双变量分析,以探讨D-MER症状、人口统计学和自我报告的精神健康史之间的关系。271例患者中,42例(15.5%)报告D-MER。有D-MER症状的女性更有可能报告有惊恐发作史(28.6% vs. 12.2%, OR 2.87, 95% CI 1.23-6.25)。
{"title":"Dysphoric milk ejection reflex: prevalence and associations with self-reported mental health history","authors":"Megan Howard, Alison N. Goulding, Anitha Muddana, Terri L. Fletcher, Nicole Cirino, Alison M. Stuebe","doi":"10.1007/s00737-025-01571-4","DOIUrl":"10.1007/s00737-025-01571-4","url":null,"abstract":"<p>This study sought to determine prevalence of Dysphoric Milk Ejection Reflex (D-MER) and mental health correlates in a cohort of patients from a breastfeeding medicine clinic. We determined prevalence of D-MER symptoms and performed bivariate analyses to explore associations between D-MER symptoms, demographics, and self-reported mental health history. Among 271 patients, 42 (15.5%) reported D-MER. Women with D-MER symptoms were more likely to report a history of panic attacks (28.6 vs. 12.2%, OR 2.87, 95% CI 1.23–6.25).</p>","PeriodicalId":8369,"journal":{"name":"Archives of Women's Mental Health","volume":"28 5","pages":"1319 - 1323"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7,"publicationDate":"2025-02-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143456631","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-02-19DOI: 10.1007/s00737-025-01566-1
Lorenzo Pelizza, Camilla Ricci, Emanuela Leuci, Emanuela Quattrone, Derna Palmisano, Simona Pupo, Giuseppina Paulillo, Clara Pellegrini, Pietro Pellegrini, Marco Menchetti
Purpose
Males and females with First Episode Psychosis (FEP) usually tend to differ in psychopathology, clinical presentation and their longitudinal trajectory. This study aimed to examine the difference of effectiveness of specialized psychosocial and pharmacological treatments for FEP, focusing on various clinical and functioning outcomes across a 2-years follow-up period.
Methods
The assessment included the CAARMS, the HoNOS, the PANSS and the GAF scale and was conducted at baseline and every 12 months.
Results
490 FEP patients (age: 12–35 years) were recruited. Of them, 363 completed the follow-up (132 females and 231 males). At baseline, males showed a higher prevalence rate of schizophrenia diagnosis (56.1% VS 43.8%; p = .008), whereas females a higher prevalence rate of affective psychosis (36.2% VS 23.3%; p = .005). Male participants also showed a more consistent substance abuse (46.9% VS 24.3%; p = .0001), lower years of education (11.26 ± 2.94 VS 11.88 ± 2.68; p = .013), and more striking behavioral manifestations (4.06 ± 2.36 VS 3.39 ± 2.58; p = .003) compared to women. Our 2-year outcome parameter results showed a higher incidence of functional remission over time in females compared to males (49.2% VS 39.0%; p = .028), together with a decreasing trend in new hospitalization rates (17.8% VS 26.9%; p = .089). Independently from sex, our results also showed a statistically significant reduction in the prescription of psychotropic medications and through the increase of all psychosocial interventions, although more evident in males.
Conclusion
These results suggested that specialized interventions for FEP are overall effective in both treated subgroups. Additionally, FEP women specifically showed higher rates of improvement in functional outcome variables over time when compared to males.
目的:男性和女性首发精神病(FEP)通常在精神病理、临床表现及其纵向轨迹上存在差异。本研究旨在检验特殊心理社会治疗和药物治疗对FEP有效性的差异,重点关注2年随访期间的各种临床和功能结果。方法:采用CAARMS、HoNOS、PANSS和GAF量表进行评估,分别于基线和每12个月进行一次。结果:招募了490例FEP患者(年龄12-35岁)。其中363人完成随访(女性132人,男性231人)。在基线时,男性精神分裂症诊断的患病率更高(56.1% VS 43.8%;p = 0.008),而女性情感性精神病患病率更高(36.2% VS 23.3%;p = .005)。男性参与者也表现出更一致的药物滥用(46.9% VS 24.3%;p = 0.0001),受教育年限较低(11.26±2.94 VS 11.88±2.68;p = 0.013),更显著的行为表现(4.06±2.36 VS 3.39±2.58;P = .003)。我们的2年结局参数结果显示,随着时间的推移,女性功能缓解的发生率高于男性(49.2% VS 39.0%;p = 0.028),同时新住院率呈下降趋势(17.8% VS 26.9%;p = .089)。除性别外,我们的研究结果还显示,尽管在男性中更为明显,但在统计上,精神药物处方的减少和所有心理社会干预的增加都有显著的统计学意义。结论:这些结果表明,在两个治疗亚组中,FEP的专门干预总体上是有效的。此外,与男性相比,FEP女性在功能结果变量方面表现出更高的改善率。
{"title":"Sex comparisons on the beneficial effects of an early intervention program in a patients’ cohort with first episode psychosis: what effectiveness in women?","authors":"Lorenzo Pelizza, Camilla Ricci, Emanuela Leuci, Emanuela Quattrone, Derna Palmisano, Simona Pupo, Giuseppina Paulillo, Clara Pellegrini, Pietro Pellegrini, Marco Menchetti","doi":"10.1007/s00737-025-01566-1","DOIUrl":"10.1007/s00737-025-01566-1","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Purpose</h3><p>Males and females with First Episode Psychosis (FEP) usually tend to differ in psychopathology, clinical presentation and their longitudinal trajectory. This study aimed to examine the difference of effectiveness of specialized psychosocial and pharmacological treatments for FEP, focusing on various clinical and functioning outcomes across a 2-years follow-up period.</p><h3>Methods</h3><p>The assessment included the CAARMS, the HoNOS, the PANSS and the GAF scale and was conducted at baseline and every 12 months.</p><h3>Results</h3><p>490 FEP patients (age: 12–35 years) were recruited. Of them, 363 completed the follow-up (132 females and 231 males). At baseline, males showed a higher prevalence rate of schizophrenia diagnosis (56.1% VS 43.8%; <i>p</i> = .008), whereas females a higher prevalence rate of affective psychosis (36.2% VS 23.3%; <i>p</i> = .005). Male participants also showed a more consistent substance abuse (46.9% VS 24.3%; <i>p</i> = .0001), lower years of education (11.26 ± 2.94 VS 11.88 ± 2.68; <i>p</i> = .013), and more striking behavioral manifestations (4.06 ± 2.36 VS 3.39 ± 2.58; <i>p</i> = .003) compared to women. Our 2-year outcome parameter results showed a higher incidence of functional remission over time in females compared to males (49.2% VS 39.0%; <i>p</i> = .028), together with a decreasing trend in new hospitalization rates (17.8% VS 26.9%; <i>p</i> = .089). Independently from sex, our results also showed a statistically significant reduction in the prescription of psychotropic medications and through the increase of all psychosocial interventions, although more evident in males.</p><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>These results suggested that specialized interventions for FEP are overall effective in both treated subgroups. Additionally, FEP women specifically showed higher rates of improvement in functional outcome variables over time when compared to males.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":8369,"journal":{"name":"Archives of Women's Mental Health","volume":"28 5","pages":"1151 - 1166"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7,"publicationDate":"2025-02-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s00737-025-01566-1.pdf","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143456641","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-02-18DOI: 10.1007/s00737-025-01569-y
Mingxuan Zou, Bin Liu, Jing Ji, Lei Ren, Yuqing He, Huaihuai Wei, Mengxin Yin, Hui Hu, Xufeng Liu, Shengjun Wu, Hui Wang, Xiuchao Wang
Purpose
The prevalence of depression is higher in women than in men. This may be because women are more prone to rumination. However, there is a lack of evidence about which rumination symptoms are most strongly associated with depression in women. According to the network theory of mental disorders, the complex interaction between different subtypes of rumination and depressive symptoms is confusing. We utilized the network analysis method to examine the connection between different subtypes of rumination and depressive symptoms across different gender groups and to investigate gender differences in rumination-depression networks.
Methods
798 Chinese university students (50.5% males and 49.5% females) completed The Rumination Response Scale (RRS) and The Beck Depression Inventory-Second Edition (BDI-II) scales via an online survey platform for this study. The networks were analyzed and built with scale dimensions as nodes.
Results
The line graph indicates that the B (Brooding) and N (Negative attitude) nodes had the highest BEI values in the female group, whereas the R (Reflection) and N nodes had the highest BEI values in the male group.
Conclusion
The findings revealed that males and females in the rumination-depression network had distinct rumination bridge nodes (male: Reflection; female: Brooding) but had a common depression bridge node (Negative attitude). The connection between different types of rumination and depressive symptoms was more pronounced in the female network. The findings enhance comprehension of gender disparities in the co-occurrence of rumination and depression, offering specific subtypes for targeted intervention in rumination.
{"title":"Gender difference in rumination subtypes connecting to depression","authors":"Mingxuan Zou, Bin Liu, Jing Ji, Lei Ren, Yuqing He, Huaihuai Wei, Mengxin Yin, Hui Hu, Xufeng Liu, Shengjun Wu, Hui Wang, Xiuchao Wang","doi":"10.1007/s00737-025-01569-y","DOIUrl":"10.1007/s00737-025-01569-y","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Purpose</h3><p>The prevalence of depression is higher in women than in men. This may be because women are more prone to rumination. However, there is a lack of evidence about which rumination symptoms are most strongly associated with depression in women. According to the network theory of mental disorders, the complex interaction between different subtypes of rumination and depressive symptoms is confusing. We utilized the network analysis method to examine the connection between different subtypes of rumination and depressive symptoms across different gender groups and to investigate gender differences in rumination-depression networks.</p><h3>Methods</h3><p>798 Chinese university students (50.5% males and 49.5% females) completed The Rumination Response Scale (RRS) and The Beck Depression Inventory-Second Edition (BDI-II) scales via an online survey platform for this study. The networks were analyzed and built with scale dimensions as nodes.</p><h3>Results</h3><p>The line graph indicates that the B (Brooding) and N (Negative attitude) nodes had the highest BEI values in the female group, whereas the R (Reflection) and N nodes had the highest BEI values in the male group.</p><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>The findings revealed that males and females in the rumination-depression network had distinct rumination bridge nodes (male: Reflection; female: Brooding) but had a common depression bridge node (Negative attitude). The connection between different types of rumination and depressive symptoms was more pronounced in the female network. The findings enhance comprehension of gender disparities in the co-occurrence of rumination and depression, offering specific subtypes for targeted intervention in rumination.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":8369,"journal":{"name":"Archives of Women's Mental Health","volume":"28 5","pages":"1143 - 1150"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7,"publicationDate":"2025-02-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s00737-025-01569-y.pdf","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143439673","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-02-18DOI: 10.1007/s00737-025-01564-3
Sahar Raza, Rajon Banik, Syed Toukir Ahmed Noor, Abu Sayeed, Anindita Saha, Esrat Jahan, Ashiquzzaman, Md. Abu Bakkar Siddique, Anisuddin Ahmed, Ahmed Ehsanur Rahman
Purpose
This study aimed to investigate the prevalence, determinants, and care-seeking practices for anxiety and depression among reproductive-aged women in Bangladesh.
Methods
We utilized data from the 2022 Bangladesh Demographic and Health Survey, with a total weighted sample of 20,029 women aged 15–49. Anxiety and depression symptoms were assessed using the Generalized Anxiety Disorder-7 (GAD-7) scale and the Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-9) scale, respectively. Prevalence was reported with 95% confidence intervals (CI). Multiple logistic regression was conducted to identify associated factors, and the results were presented as adjusted odds ratios (AOR) with 95% CI.
Results
Among women, 4% (95% CI: 3.9%, 4.9%) had symptoms of moderate to severe anxiety, and 5% had moderate to severe depression. The prevalence of both symptoms was significantly higher (p < 0.05) in Khulna, Rangpur, and Sylhet. Older women (45–49 years) (anxiety: AOR: 2.33, 95% CI: 1.55, 3.50; depression: AOR: 1.63, 95% CI: 1.15, 2.31) and women who made all major household decisions (anxiety: AOR: 1.30, 95% CI: 1.00, 1.69; depression: AOR: 1.41, 95% CI: 1.07, 1.80) were more likely to experience moderate to severe anxiety and depression. Among women with symptoms of moderate to severe anxiety or depression, 22% (95% CI: 19.9%, 25.0%) sought care, and 8% (95% CI: 6.6%, 10.1%) used medication.
Conclusion
The findings highlight a significant burden of anxiety and depression among women in Bangladesh, with notable regional disparities. These insights underscore the need for targeted interventions to address regional disparities, support vulnerable groups such as older women and those involved in household decision-making, and integrate mental health services into primary healthcare for better mental well-being among women in Bangladesh.