Arquivos Brasileiros de Cardiologia最新文献

Background: Chemotherapeutic agents (e.g., anthracyclines, trastuzumab) commonly used for treating malignant tumors have been demonstrated to have cardiotoxic effects, which is associated with poor prognosis. Three-dimensional echocardiography has been used to predict cancer chemotherapy-induced cardiac dysfunction.

Objectives: Evaluation of the diagnostic performance of strain parameters, global area strain (GAS), longitudinal strain (GLS), circumferential strain (GCS), and radial strain (GRS) by meta-analysis.

Methods: Relevant studies were searched from the Embase, PubMed, and Web of Science databases. Statistical analysis was performed using Stata 12. The summary receiver operating characteristic curve, sensitivity, specificity, positive likelihood ratio (PLR), negative likelihood ratio (NLR), and corresponding 95% confidence interval for the four strain parameters were pooled. P<0.05 was considered statistically significant.

Results: Nine studies involving 650 participants were included. GAS and GLS showed significant diagnostic advantages over GCS and GRS. For GAS, the sensitivity was 0.85 (0.70, 0.93) and specificity was 0.82(0.78, 0.86) with PLR of 4.76 (3.55, 6.39) and NLR of 0.18 (0.09, 0.39) and an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.85 (0.82, 0.88). For GLS, the sensitivity was 0.81 (0.74, 0.86) and specificity was 0.81(0.68, 0.90) with PLR of 4.35(2.42, 7.80) and NLR of 0.23 (0.17, 0.33) and an AUC of 0.85 (0.82, 0.88). The GCS showed a sensitivity of 0.63 and a specificity of 0.79 with an AUC of 0.77. The GRS showed a sensitivity of 0.74 and a specificity of 0.66 with an AUC of 0.73.

Conclusion: 3D-STI strain parameters GAS and GLS showed good performance in detecting early cardiac dysfunction in patients with tumors receiving chemotherapy.

Background: For practical and protective ventilation during cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR), a 150-grams mechanical ventilator (VLP2000E) that limits peak inspiratory pressure (PIP) during simultaneous ventilation with chest compressions was developed.

Objectives: To evaluate the feasibility of VLP2000E ventilation during CPR and to compare monitored parameters versus bag-valve ventilation.

Methods: A randomized experimental study with 10 intubated pigs per group. After seven minutes of ventricular fibrillation, 2-minute CPR cycles were delivered. All animals were placed on VLP2000E after achieving return of spontaneous circulation (ROSC).

Results: Bag-valve and VLP2000E groups had similar ROSC rate (60% vs. 50%, respectively) and arterial oxygen saturation in most CPR cycles, different baseline tidal volume [0.764 (0.068) vs. 0.591 (0.123) L, p = 0.0309, respectively] and, in 14 cycles, different PIP [52 (9) vs. 39 (5) cm H2O, respectively], tidal volume [0.635 (0.172) vs. 0.306 (0.129) L], ETCO2[14 (8) vs. 27 (9) mm Hg], and peak inspiratory flow [0.878 (0.234) vs. 0.533 (0.105) L/s], all p < 0.0001. Dynamic lung compliance (≥ 0.025 L/cm H2O) decreased after ROSC in bag-valve group but was maintained in VLP2000E group [0.019 (0.006) vs. 0.024 (0.008) L/cm H2O, p = 0.0003].

Conclusions: VLP2000E ventilation during CPR is feasible and equivalent to bag-valve ventilation in ROSC rate and arterial oxygen saturation. It produces better respiratory parameters, with lower airway pressure and tidal volume. VLP2000E ventilation also prevents the significant decrease of dynamic lung compliance observed after bag-valve ventilation. Further preclinical studies confirming these findings would be interesting.

Valvular heart disease (VHD) is an increasing health problem worldwide. Patients with VHD may experience several cardiovascular-related emergencies. The management of these patients is a challenge in the emergency department, especially when the previous heart condition is unknown. Specific recommendations for the initial management are currently poor. This integrative review proposes an evidence-based three-step approach from bedside VHD suspicion to the initial treatment of the emergencies. The first step is the suspicion of underlying valvular condition based on signs and symptoms. The second step comprises the attempt to confirm the diagnosis and assessment of VHD severity with complementary tests. Finally, the third step addresses the diagnosis and treatment options for heart failure, atrial fibrillation, valvular thrombosis, acute rheumatic fever, and infective endocarditis. In addition, several images of complementary tests and summary tables are provided for physician support.