首页 > 最新文献

Asia-Pacific Journal of Oncology Nursing最新文献

英文 中文
Group-based trajectory modeling for supportive care needs in Chinese cancer survivors: A systematic review 中国癌症幸存者支持性护理需求的基于群体的轨迹模型:一项系统综述。
IF 2.8 3区 医学 Q1 NURSING Pub Date : 2025-12-01 DOI: 10.1016/j.apjon.2025.100738
Kexin Li , Shi Chen , Ran Xu , Xiaohui Dong, Xianying Lu, Xinyu Chen, Chaoming Hou, Jing Gao

Objectives

This study aims to systematically synthesize studies that applied group-based trajectory modeling to examine the trajectories of supportive care needs (SCNs) among cancer survivors and to identify associated influencing factors.

Methods

A comprehensive literature search was conducted in the following databases: CINAHL, Cochrane Library, Embase, PubMed, Web of Science, CNKI, SinoMed, VIP, and Wanfang. Studies were screened and assessed independently by two reviewers using the Joanna Briggs Institute (JBI) Critical Appraisal Checklist for Cohort Studies and the Guidelines for Reporting on Latent Trajectory Studies (GRoLTS) checklist. Key study characteristics and findings were extracted and synthesized narratively.

Results

Ten studies met the inclusion criteria. Five distinct SCNs trajectories were identified across studies, including high-stable, moderate-stable, low-stable, decreasing, and increasing patterns. A total of 18 statistically significant influencing factors were identified and categorized according to the five domains of the Social-Ecological Model (SEM). Most factors were related to demographic characteristics, clinical variables, and individual symptoms.

Conclusions

SCNs trajectories among cancer survivors exhibit substantial heterogeneity. While individual- and disease-level factors are commonly reported, limited evidence exists regarding the role of social support, healthcare system factors, and community-level influences. Future research should incorporate broader socio-environmental determinants to enhance understanding of SCNs patterns and inform tailored survivorship care.

Systematic review registration

PROSPERO CRD42024586557.
目的:本研究旨在系统地综合应用基于群体的轨迹模型来研究癌症幸存者的支持性护理需求(scn)轨迹,并确定相关的影响因素。方法:在CINAHL、Cochrane Library、Embase、PubMed、Web of Science、CNKI、SinoMed、VIP、万方等数据库中进行综合文献检索。研究由两名评论者使用乔安娜布里格斯研究所(JBI)队列研究关键评估清单和潜在轨迹研究报告指南(GRoLTS)清单进行筛选和独立评估。对研究的主要特点和发现进行了提取和综合。结果:10项研究符合纳入标准。在研究中发现了五种不同的scn轨迹,包括高稳定、中等稳定、低稳定、减少和增加模式。根据社会生态模型(SEM)的五个领域,共确定了18个具有统计意义的影响因素并进行了分类。大多数因素与人口学特征、临床变量和个体症状有关。结论:癌症幸存者的scn轨迹表现出实质性的异质性。虽然个人和疾病层面的因素通常被报道,但关于社会支持、医疗保健系统因素和社区层面影响的作用的证据有限。未来的研究应纳入更广泛的社会环境决定因素,以加强对SCNs模式的理解,并为量身定制的生存护理提供信息。系统评价注册:PROSPERO CRD42024586557。
{"title":"Group-based trajectory modeling for supportive care needs in Chinese cancer survivors: A systematic review","authors":"Kexin Li ,&nbsp;Shi Chen ,&nbsp;Ran Xu ,&nbsp;Xiaohui Dong,&nbsp;Xianying Lu,&nbsp;Xinyu Chen,&nbsp;Chaoming Hou,&nbsp;Jing Gao","doi":"10.1016/j.apjon.2025.100738","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.apjon.2025.100738","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objectives</h3><div>This study aims to systematically synthesize studies that applied group-based trajectory modeling to examine the trajectories of supportive care needs (SCNs) among cancer survivors and to identify associated influencing factors.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>A comprehensive literature search was conducted in the following databases: CINAHL, Cochrane Library, Embase, PubMed, Web of Science, CNKI, SinoMed, VIP, and Wanfang. Studies were screened and assessed independently by two reviewers using the Joanna Briggs Institute (JBI) Critical Appraisal Checklist for Cohort Studies and the Guidelines for Reporting on Latent Trajectory Studies (GRoLTS) checklist. Key study characteristics and findings were extracted and synthesized narratively.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Ten studies met the inclusion criteria. Five distinct SCNs trajectories were identified across studies, including high-stable, moderate-stable, low-stable, decreasing, and increasing patterns. A total of 18 statistically significant influencing factors were identified and categorized according to the five domains of the Social-Ecological Model (SEM). Most factors were related to demographic characteristics, clinical variables, and individual symptoms.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>SCNs trajectories among cancer survivors exhibit substantial heterogeneity. While individual- and disease-level factors are commonly reported, limited evidence exists regarding the role of social support, healthcare system factors, and community-level influences. Future research should incorporate broader socio-environmental determinants to enhance understanding of SCNs patterns and inform tailored survivorship care.</div></div><div><h3>Systematic review registration</h3><div>PROSPERO CRD42024586557.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":8569,"journal":{"name":"Asia-Pacific Journal of Oncology Nursing","volume":"12 ","pages":"Article 100738"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8,"publicationDate":"2025-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144658241","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Transforming pediatric palliative care through technology: Insights from Iran's experience and existing challenges 通过技术改变儿科姑息治疗:来自伊朗经验和现有挑战的见解。
IF 2.8 3区 医学 Q1 NURSING Pub Date : 2025-12-01 DOI: 10.1016/j.apjon.2025.100753
Mohadese Babaie, Maryam Rassouli, Azam Shirinabadi Farahani
{"title":"Transforming pediatric palliative care through technology: Insights from Iran's experience and existing challenges","authors":"Mohadese Babaie,&nbsp;Maryam Rassouli,&nbsp;Azam Shirinabadi Farahani","doi":"10.1016/j.apjon.2025.100753","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.apjon.2025.100753","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":8569,"journal":{"name":"Asia-Pacific Journal of Oncology Nursing","volume":"12 ","pages":"Article 100753"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8,"publicationDate":"2025-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144726921","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Best evidence summary on anticoagulant management in patients with cancer-associated venous thromboembolism 癌症相关性静脉血栓栓塞患者抗凝治疗的最佳证据总结。
IF 2.8 3区 医学 Q1 NURSING Pub Date : 2025-12-01 DOI: 10.1016/j.apjon.2025.100789
Xinyue Xiang , Yudi Yu , Xiaomei Fang , Tian Zheng , Wenbo Qiao

Objective

To retrieve, evaluate, and summarize the best evidence for anticoagulant management in patients with cancer-associated venous thromboembolism (VTE).

Methods

This was an evidence summary study conducted in strict accordance with the reporting standards of the Fudan University Center for Evidence-Based Nursing. According to the evidence pyramid “6S” model, the search was performed from top to bottom. The following databases were searched: BMJ Best Practice, UpToDate, Joanna Briggs Institute, Cochrane Library, Guidelines International Network, National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence, Scottish Intercollegiate Guidelines Network, Registered Nurses Association of Ontario, YiMaiTong Guidelines Network, PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, Sinomed, China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI), Wanfang, and VIP. Professional association websites included those of the American Society of Clinical Oncology, American Society of Hematology, British Society for Haematology, and the Scientific and Standardization Committee of the International Society on Thrombosis and Haemostasis. The search period was from the inception of each database to October 2024. Literature types included clinical practice guidelines, clinical decisions, expert consensuses, systematic reviews, and randomized controlled trials (RCTs).

Results

A total of 19 studies were included, comprising three clinical decisions, 10 guidelines, one expert consensus, four systematic reviews, and one RCT. Thirty-four pieces of evidence were synthesized across eight aspects: risk factor assessment, timing of anticoagulation, drug selection, treatment duration, management of recurrence, safety monitoring, health education, and follow-up care.

Conclusions

This study summarizes the best evidence for anticoagulant management in patients with cancer-associated VTE. When applying this evidence clinically, health care providers should thoroughly evaluate the feasibility and appropriateness of each recommendation to develop clinical decisions tailored to China's national conditions and health care resources.

Systematic review registration

This study has been registered on the Fudan University Centre for Evidence-based Nursing (Registration No. ES20244015).
目的:检索、评价和总结癌症相关性静脉血栓栓塞(VTE)患者抗凝治疗的最佳证据。方法:本研究是一项严格按照复旦大学循证护理中心报告标准进行的证据总结研究。根据证据金字塔“6S”模型,从上到下进行搜索。检索的数据库包括:BMJ Best Practice、UpToDate、Joanna Briggs Institute、Cochrane Library、Guidelines International Network、National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence、Scottish Intercollegiate Guidelines Network、Ontario注册护士协会、YiMaiTong Guidelines Network、PubMed、Embase、Web of Science、中国医学信息网(CNKI)、万方、VIP。专业协会网站包括美国临床肿瘤学会、美国血液学会、英国血液学会、国际血栓与止血学会科学与标准化委员会。检索周期为每个数据库建立之初至2024年10月。文献类型包括临床实践指南、临床决策、专家共识、系统评价和随机对照试验(rct)。结果:共纳入19项研究,包括3项临床决定、10项指南、1项专家共识、4项系统评价和1项随机对照试验。从危险因素评估、抗凝时机、药物选择、治疗时间、复发管理、安全监测、健康教育和随访护理等8个方面综合34条证据。结论:本研究总结了癌症相关性静脉血栓栓塞患者抗凝治疗的最佳证据。在临床应用这些证据时,卫生保健提供者应全面评估每项建议的可行性和适当性,以制定适合中国国情和卫生保健资源的临床决策。系统评价注册:本研究已在复旦大学循证护理研究中心注册(注册号:ES20244015)。
{"title":"Best evidence summary on anticoagulant management in patients with cancer-associated venous thromboembolism","authors":"Xinyue Xiang ,&nbsp;Yudi Yu ,&nbsp;Xiaomei Fang ,&nbsp;Tian Zheng ,&nbsp;Wenbo Qiao","doi":"10.1016/j.apjon.2025.100789","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.apjon.2025.100789","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><div>To retrieve, evaluate, and summarize the best evidence for anticoagulant management in patients with cancer-associated venous thromboembolism (VTE).</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>This was an evidence summary study conducted in strict accordance with the reporting standards of the Fudan University Center for Evidence-Based Nursing. According to the evidence pyramid “6S” model, the search was performed from top to bottom. The following databases were searched: BMJ Best Practice, UpToDate, Joanna Briggs Institute, Cochrane Library, Guidelines International Network, National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence, Scottish Intercollegiate Guidelines Network, Registered Nurses Association of Ontario, YiMaiTong Guidelines Network, PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, Sinomed, China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI), Wanfang, and VIP. Professional association websites included those of the American Society of Clinical Oncology, American Society of Hematology, British Society for Haematology, and the Scientific and Standardization Committee of the International Society on Thrombosis and Haemostasis. The search period was from the inception of each database to October 2024. Literature types included clinical practice guidelines, clinical decisions, expert consensuses, systematic reviews, and randomized controlled trials (RCTs).</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>A total of 19 studies were included, comprising three clinical decisions, 10 guidelines, one expert consensus, four systematic reviews, and one RCT. Thirty-four pieces of evidence were synthesized across eight aspects: risk factor assessment, timing of anticoagulation, drug selection, treatment duration, management of recurrence, safety monitoring, health education, and follow-up care.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>This study summarizes the best evidence for anticoagulant management in patients with cancer-associated VTE. When applying this evidence clinically, health care providers should thoroughly evaluate the feasibility and appropriateness of each recommendation to develop clinical decisions tailored to China's national conditions and health care resources.</div></div><div><h3>Systematic review registration</h3><div>This study has been registered on the Fudan University Centre for Evidence-based Nursing (Registration No. ES20244015).</div></div>","PeriodicalId":8569,"journal":{"name":"Asia-Pacific Journal of Oncology Nursing","volume":"12 ","pages":"Article 100789"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8,"publicationDate":"2025-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145372014","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
The role of aerobic and resistance exercise for cancer cachexia management – A systematic scoping review 有氧运动和抗阻运动对癌症恶病质管理的作用——一项系统的范围综述。
IF 2.8 3区 医学 Q1 NURSING Pub Date : 2025-12-01 DOI: 10.1016/j.apjon.2025.100748
Romane Peyrachon , Astrid Lièvre , Amélie Rébillard

Objective

Cancer cachexia is highly prevalent in digestive and head and neck cancer patients who often face mechanical eating difficulties and metabolic disturbances. However, terminological and diagnostic ambiguities surround cachexia, limiting the evaluation of the effects of management interventions for these patients. Whole-body exercise plays a key role in mitigating weight and muscle mass losses. This scoping review provides an updated synthesis of the effects of exercise interventions and offers practical guidelines for patients with digestive or head and neck cancers experiencing undernutrition, anorexia, sarcopenia, and/or cachexia.

Methods

In accordance with Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) recommendations, a systematic search of the published literature was carried out in the PubMed, Google Scholar, and EBSCOhost databases. Studies eligible for inclusion investigated the feasibility and effects of whole-body exercise interventions in digestive or head and neck cancer patients with altered nutritional status. The findings from each study were tabulated and synthesized according to the type of exercise intervention.

Results

Twenty-six full texts out of 603 studies met the inclusion criteria, encompassing a total of 1936 patients participated (mean age: 63.80 ​± ​6.22 years; 822 [31.62%] women). Exercise interventions did not result in adverse outcomes. The most assessed parameters included functional and aerobic capacity, muscle strength, body weight, quality of life, and physical activity levels, with findings ranging from positive effects and trends to non-significant changes. Interventions incorporating endurance exercises demonstrated greater improvements in functional and aerobic capacity compared to those focusing solely on resistance training. Supervised interventions yielded the most significant improvements.

Conclusions

Exercise interventions are safe and feasible for patients with digestive and head and neck cancers identified as suffering from undernutrition, anorexia, sarcopenia, and/or cachexia. Future research should focus on tailoring exercise characteristics to achieve greatest benefits in patients with cachexia. Studies should also explore real-life implementation strategies to optimize patient engagement and adherence while accommodating medical and personal constraints.

Systematic review registration

CRD42024602857.
目的:恶性恶病质在消化和头颈部癌症患者中非常普遍,他们经常面临机械进食困难和代谢紊乱。然而,术语和诊断的模糊性围绕恶病质,限制了对这些患者的管理干预效果的评估。全身运动在减轻体重和肌肉质量损失方面起着关键作用。本综述提供了运动干预效果的最新综合,并为患有营养不良、厌食症、肌肉减少症和/或恶病质的消化或头颈癌患者提供了实用指南。方法:根据系统评价和荟萃分析的首选报告项目(PRISMA)建议,在PubMed、谷歌Scholar和EBSCOhost数据库中对已发表的文献进行系统检索。有资格纳入的研究调查了对营养状况改变的消化道或头颈癌患者进行全身运动干预的可行性和效果。根据运动干预的类型,将每项研究的结果制成表格并加以综合。结果:603项研究中有26篇全文符合纳入标准,共纳入1936例患者(平均年龄:63.80±6.22岁;822名[31.62%]女性)。运动干预没有导致不良结果。评估最多的参数包括功能和有氧能力、肌肉力量、体重、生活质量和身体活动水平,结果从积极影响和趋势到无显著变化不等。与仅仅专注于阻力训练的干预相比,结合耐力训练的干预显示出更大的功能和有氧能力的改善。有监督的干预产生了最显著的改善。结论:对于患有营养不良、厌食症、肌肉减少症和/或恶病质的消化和头颈癌患者,运动干预是安全可行的。未来的研究应侧重于调整运动特征,以使恶病质患者获得最大的益处。研究还应探索现实生活中的实施策略,以优化患者的参与和依从性,同时适应医疗和个人的限制。系统评价注册号:CRD42024602857。
{"title":"The role of aerobic and resistance exercise for cancer cachexia management – A systematic scoping review","authors":"Romane Peyrachon ,&nbsp;Astrid Lièvre ,&nbsp;Amélie Rébillard","doi":"10.1016/j.apjon.2025.100748","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.apjon.2025.100748","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><div>Cancer cachexia is highly prevalent in digestive and head and neck cancer patients who often face mechanical eating difficulties and metabolic disturbances. However, terminological and diagnostic ambiguities surround cachexia, limiting the evaluation of the effects of management interventions for these patients. Whole-body exercise plays a key role in mitigating weight and muscle mass losses. This scoping review provides an updated synthesis of the effects of exercise interventions and offers practical guidelines for patients with digestive or head and neck cancers experiencing undernutrition, anorexia, sarcopenia, and/or cachexia.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>In accordance with Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) recommendations, a systematic search of the published literature was carried out in the PubMed, Google Scholar, and EBSCOhost databases. Studies eligible for inclusion investigated the feasibility and effects of whole-body exercise interventions in digestive or head and neck cancer patients with altered nutritional status. The findings from each study were tabulated and synthesized according to the type of exercise intervention.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Twenty-six full texts out of 603 studies met the inclusion criteria, encompassing a total of 1936 patients participated (mean age: 63.80 ​± ​6.22 years; 822 [31.62%] women). Exercise interventions did not result in adverse outcomes. The most assessed parameters included functional and aerobic capacity, muscle strength, body weight, quality of life, and physical activity levels, with findings ranging from positive effects and trends to non-significant changes. Interventions incorporating endurance exercises demonstrated greater improvements in functional and aerobic capacity compared to those focusing solely on resistance training. Supervised interventions yielded the most significant improvements.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Exercise interventions are safe and feasible for patients with digestive and head and neck cancers identified as suffering from undernutrition, anorexia, sarcopenia, and/or cachexia. Future research should focus on tailoring exercise characteristics to achieve greatest benefits in patients with cachexia. Studies should also explore real-life implementation strategies to optimize patient engagement and adherence while accommodating medical and personal constraints.</div></div><div><h3>Systematic review registration</h3><div>CRD42024602857.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":8569,"journal":{"name":"Asia-Pacific Journal of Oncology Nursing","volume":"12 ","pages":"Article 100748"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8,"publicationDate":"2025-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144673872","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Effectiveness of question prompt list interventions for patients with cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials 问题提示列表干预对癌症患者的有效性:随机对照试验的系统回顾和荟萃分析。
IF 2.8 3区 医学 Q1 NURSING Pub Date : 2025-12-01 DOI: 10.1016/j.apjon.2025.100765
Ruichen Han , Jiayi Liu , Jiarui Chen , Jinfeng Ding , Can Gu , Ni Gong , Jinnan Xiao

Objective

This study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of question prompt list (QPL) interventions in patients with cancer and to synthesize the delivery characteristics of such interventions.

Methods

A systematic search of five electronic databases was conducted for English-language randomized controlled trials published up to January 2025. Two independent reviewers performed study selection and data extraction. Eligible studies included cancer patients aged 16 years or older, with QPLs used in the intervention group to facilitate patient–physician communication. The Cochrane Risk of Bias 2.0 tool was used to assess study quality, and meta-analysis was conducted using RevMan 5.4 software.

Results

A total of 302 records were identified, of which 14 studies (reported in 16 articles) met the inclusion criteria. Interventions were categorized into two groups: QPLs with instructions and QPLs without instructions. Pooled meta-analysis demonstrated that QPL interventions significantly enhanced patient engagement in shared decision-making, increased the number of questions asked, and improved the perceived helpfulness of the material. Compared to QPL alone, QPL with instructions further increased the number of patient-initiated questions and improved decision self-efficacy.

Conclusions

QPL interventions with accompanying instructions showed superior effectiveness in promoting patient question-asking behavior and enhancing decision self-efficacy. This review underscores the potential of QPLs—particularly those with instructions—to improve patient–physician communication. Further research is warranted to refine these interventions and explore their role in reducing patient anxiety.

Systematic review registration

PROSPERO: CRD42024594145.
目的:本研究旨在评价QPL干预措施在癌症患者中的有效性,并综合QPL干预措施的实施特点。方法:系统检索截至2025年1月发表的英文随机对照试验的5个电子数据库。两名独立审稿人进行研究选择和数据提取。符合条件的研究包括16岁或以上的癌症患者,QPLs用于干预组以促进医患沟通。采用Cochrane Risk of Bias 2.0工具评价研究质量,采用RevMan 5.4软件进行meta分析。结果:共纳入302条记录,其中14项研究(16篇报道)符合纳入标准。干预措施分为两组:有指导的QPLs和没有指导的QPLs。汇总荟萃分析表明,QPL干预措施显著提高了患者参与共同决策,增加了提问的数量,并提高了材料的感知帮助。与单独的QPL相比,有指导的QPL进一步增加了患者发起的问题数量,提高了决策自我效能感。结论:QPL干预在促进患者提问行为和提高决策自我效能感方面具有较好的效果。这篇综述强调了qpl的潜力,特别是那些有指导的qpl在改善医患沟通方面的潜力。需要进一步的研究来完善这些干预措施,并探索它们在减少患者焦虑方面的作用。系统评价注册:PROSPERO: CRD42024594145。
{"title":"Effectiveness of question prompt list interventions for patients with cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials","authors":"Ruichen Han ,&nbsp;Jiayi Liu ,&nbsp;Jiarui Chen ,&nbsp;Jinfeng Ding ,&nbsp;Can Gu ,&nbsp;Ni Gong ,&nbsp;Jinnan Xiao","doi":"10.1016/j.apjon.2025.100765","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.apjon.2025.100765","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><div>This study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of question prompt list (QPL) interventions in patients with cancer and to synthesize the delivery characteristics of such interventions.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>A systematic search of five electronic databases was conducted for English-language randomized controlled trials published up to January 2025. Two independent reviewers performed study selection and data extraction. Eligible studies included cancer patients aged 16 years or older, with QPLs used in the intervention group to facilitate patient–physician communication. The Cochrane Risk of Bias 2.0 tool was used to assess study quality, and meta-analysis was conducted using RevMan 5.4 software.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>A total of 302 records were identified, of which 14 studies (reported in 16 articles) met the inclusion criteria. Interventions were categorized into two groups: QPLs with instructions and QPLs without instructions. Pooled meta-analysis demonstrated that QPL interventions significantly enhanced patient engagement in shared decision-making, increased the number of questions asked, and improved the perceived helpfulness of the material. Compared to QPL alone, QPL with instructions further increased the number of patient-initiated questions and improved decision self-efficacy.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>QPL interventions with accompanying instructions showed superior effectiveness in promoting patient question-asking behavior and enhancing decision self-efficacy. This review underscores the potential of QPLs—particularly those with instructions—to improve patient–physician communication. Further research is warranted to refine these interventions and explore their role in reducing patient anxiety.</div></div><div><h3>Systematic review registration</h3><div>PROSPERO: CRD42024594145.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":8569,"journal":{"name":"Asia-Pacific Journal of Oncology Nursing","volume":"12 ","pages":"Article 100765"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8,"publicationDate":"2025-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144940332","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Shared decision-making for early-stage breast cancer treatment: An evolutionary concept analysis 早期乳腺癌治疗的共同决策:一个进化概念分析。
IF 2.8 3区 医学 Q1 NURSING Pub Date : 2025-12-01 DOI: 10.1016/j.apjon.2025.100775
Heemin Chae , Hee-Ju Ji , Hyunjung Moon , Yeongeun Lee , Youn-Jung Son

Objective

The lack of a clear and unified definition of shared decision-making (SDM) may hinder its effective application in oncology care. This study aims to clarify the concept of SDM specifically in the context of early-stage breast cancer treatment through an evolutionary concept analysis.

Methods

A systematic search was conducted across PubMed, CINAHL, PsycINFO, Cochrane, and EMBASE databases for articles published from January 2015 to December 2024. Using keywords “shared decision-making” and “breast cancer,” relevant studies were identified, and key attributes of SDM were extracted and synthesized. Sixteen studies met the inclusion criteria.

Results

SDM for early-stage breast cancer treatment was characterized by 10 attributes spanning three levels: 1) Patient perspective: involvement in decision-making, values and preferences regarding treatment options, and deliberative thinking to achieve choice certainty; 2) Healthcare professional perspective: provision of individualized information, psychological support, consultation focused on patients’ best interests, collaborative partnerships with patients, coordinated care delivery, and promotion of person-centered, informed choices; 3) Healthcare system level: fostering a patient-centered healthcare culture.

Conclusions

These findings provide a comprehensive conceptual framework to guide the development of detailed SDM guidelines tailored for early-stage breast cancer patients. Enhanced understanding of SDM can support nurses and healthcare professionals in facilitating collaborative and optimal decision-making processes within oncology care. Furthermore, this study lays the groundwork for developing measurement tools and disease-specific interventions to advance SDM implementation in early-stage breast cancer treatment.

Systematic review registration

PROSPERO (CRD42024587218)
目的:共享决策(shared decision-making, SDM)缺乏清晰统一的定义,可能会阻碍其在肿瘤护理中的有效应用。本研究旨在通过进化概念分析,明确SDM在早期乳腺癌治疗背景下的具体概念。方法:系统检索PubMed、CINAHL、PsycINFO、Cochrane和EMBASE数据库,检索2015年1月至2024年12月发表的文章。以“共享决策”和“乳腺癌”为关键词,识别相关研究,提取合成SDM的关键属性。16项研究符合纳入标准。结果:早期乳腺癌治疗的SDM具有3个层次的10个属性特征:1)患者视角:参与决策、对治疗方案的价值观和偏好、慎重思考以实现选择确定性;2)医疗专业视角:提供个性化信息、心理支持、以患者最佳利益为中心的咨询、与患者的合作伙伴关系、协调的护理服务,以及促进以人为本的知情选择;3)医疗体系层面:培育以患者为中心的医疗文化。结论:这些发现为指导制定针对早期乳腺癌患者的详细SDM指南提供了一个全面的概念框架。加强对SDM的理解可以支持护士和医疗保健专业人员促进肿瘤护理中的协作和最佳决策过程。此外,本研究为开发测量工具和疾病特异性干预措施奠定了基础,以推进SDM在早期乳腺癌治疗中的实施。系统评价注册:PROSPERO (CRD42024587218)。
{"title":"Shared decision-making for early-stage breast cancer treatment: An evolutionary concept analysis","authors":"Heemin Chae ,&nbsp;Hee-Ju Ji ,&nbsp;Hyunjung Moon ,&nbsp;Yeongeun Lee ,&nbsp;Youn-Jung Son","doi":"10.1016/j.apjon.2025.100775","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.apjon.2025.100775","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><div>The lack of a clear and unified definition of shared decision-making (SDM) may hinder its effective application in oncology care. This study aims to clarify the concept of SDM specifically in the context of early-stage breast cancer treatment through an evolutionary concept analysis.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>A systematic search was conducted across PubMed, CINAHL, PsycINFO, Cochrane, and EMBASE databases for articles published from January 2015 to December 2024. Using keywords “shared decision-making” and “breast cancer,” relevant studies were identified, and key attributes of SDM were extracted and synthesized. Sixteen studies met the inclusion criteria.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>SDM for early-stage breast cancer treatment was characterized by 10 attributes spanning three levels: 1) Patient perspective: involvement in decision-making, values and preferences regarding treatment options, and deliberative thinking to achieve choice certainty; 2) Healthcare professional perspective: provision of individualized information, psychological support, consultation focused on patients’ best interests, collaborative partnerships with patients, coordinated care delivery, and promotion of person-centered, informed choices; 3) Healthcare system level: fostering a patient-centered healthcare culture.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>These findings provide a comprehensive conceptual framework to guide the development of detailed SDM guidelines tailored for early-stage breast cancer patients. Enhanced understanding of SDM can support nurses and healthcare professionals in facilitating collaborative and optimal decision-making processes within oncology care. Furthermore, this study lays the groundwork for developing measurement tools and disease-specific interventions to advance SDM implementation in early-stage breast cancer treatment.</div></div><div><h3>Systematic review registration</h3><div>PROSPERO (CRD42024587218)</div></div>","PeriodicalId":8569,"journal":{"name":"Asia-Pacific Journal of Oncology Nursing","volume":"12 ","pages":"Article 100775"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8,"publicationDate":"2025-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145013789","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Expert consensus on perioperative management of patients with lung cancer treated with co-ablation system therapy 联合消融系统治疗肺癌患者围手术期处理的专家共识。
IF 2.8 3区 医学 Q1 NURSING Pub Date : 2025-12-01 DOI: 10.1016/j.apjon.2025.100747
Yin Xu , Rumei Yang , Shuping Xiao , Ke Chen , Xiaoyun Zhao , Lan Gao , Xiuhong Ren , Xin Ye , Weijun Fan , Xiaoyan Wang , Zhongmin Wang , Jingjing He
This expert consensus aims to establish standardized perioperative care guidelines for patients with lung cancer undergoing co-ablation system therapy. Based on a comprehensive review of national and international guidelines and a structured consultation involving 30 nursing experts, the Perioperative Expert Working Group of the Interventionalists Branch of the Chinese Medical Doctor Association developed the 2024 Consensus. The Consensus outlines key aspects of postoperative care, strategies for the prevention and management of complications, discharge planning, and follow-up care. It provides practical and evidence-informed recommendations to guide clinical nursing practice, with the objective of promoting safe, effective, and consistent care delivery. This Consensus may also serve as a foundational framework for developing a standardized care intervention model that aligns with China's health care context and needs.
本专家共识旨在为接受联合消融系统治疗的肺癌患者建立标准化的围手术期护理指南。中国医师协会介入医师分会围手术期专家工作组在对国内外指南进行全面审查和30位护理专家的结构化咨询的基础上,制定了《2024共识》。共识概述了术后护理的关键方面,并发症的预防和管理策略,出院计划和随访护理。它提供了实用和循证的建议,以指导临床护理实践,以促进安全,有效和一致的护理提供的目标。这一共识也可以作为开发符合中国卫生保健背景和需求的标准化护理干预模式的基础框架。
{"title":"Expert consensus on perioperative management of patients with lung cancer treated with co-ablation system therapy","authors":"Yin Xu ,&nbsp;Rumei Yang ,&nbsp;Shuping Xiao ,&nbsp;Ke Chen ,&nbsp;Xiaoyun Zhao ,&nbsp;Lan Gao ,&nbsp;Xiuhong Ren ,&nbsp;Xin Ye ,&nbsp;Weijun Fan ,&nbsp;Xiaoyan Wang ,&nbsp;Zhongmin Wang ,&nbsp;Jingjing He","doi":"10.1016/j.apjon.2025.100747","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.apjon.2025.100747","url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>This expert consensus aims to establish standardized perioperative care guidelines for patients with lung cancer undergoing co-ablation system therapy. Based on a comprehensive review of national and international guidelines and a structured consultation involving 30 nursing experts, the Perioperative Expert Working Group of the Interventionalists Branch of the Chinese Medical Doctor Association developed the 2024 Consensus. The Consensus outlines key aspects of postoperative care, strategies for the prevention and management of complications, discharge planning, and follow-up care. It provides practical and evidence-informed recommendations to guide clinical nursing practice, with the objective of promoting safe, effective, and consistent care delivery. This Consensus may also serve as a foundational framework for developing a standardized care intervention model that aligns with China's health care context and needs.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":8569,"journal":{"name":"Asia-Pacific Journal of Oncology Nursing","volume":"12 ","pages":"Article 100747"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8,"publicationDate":"2025-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144673870","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Psychometric properties of patient-reported outcome measures for symptom assessment in patients with cancer receiving immunotherapy: A systematic review following the COSMIN 2.0 guidelines 在接受免疫治疗的癌症患者中,患者报告的症状评估结果测量的心理测量特性:遵循COSMIN 2.0指南的系统综述
IF 2.8 3区 医学 Q1 NURSING Pub Date : 2025-12-01 DOI: 10.1016/j.apjon.2025.100774
Defa Zhang , Yali Wang , Qian Wang , Huiqing Mao , Miaomiao Zhang , Ping Xu , Shuo Guo , Rong Yan

Objective

To identify and evaluate the methodological quality and psychometric properties of Patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) for symptom assessment in patients with cancer undergoing immunotherapy.

Methods

A systematic search was performed in PubMed, Scopus, Cochrane Library, Web of Science, Embase, CINAHL, CNKI, WanFang, Vip, and SinoMed from their inception to February 10, 2025. Eligibility criteria required studies to focus on the development or validation of a PROM for symptom assessment in adult patients with cancer undergoing immunotherapy, and to report on at least one psychometric property. The methodological quality of the included studies and the psychometric properties of the corresponding instruments were evaluated using the COSMIN 2.0 guidelines.We synthesized the evidence pertaining to each measurement property from all included studies on the same PROM.The evidence quality was evaluated based on an adapted Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation system.

Results

The final analysis included eight studies that reported on six PROMs. Because there was insufficient high-quality evidence, particularly for cross-cultural validity/measurement invariance and measurement error, no instrument could be recommended for use. However, the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Immune Checkpoint Modulator (FACT-ICM) demonstrated the most potential, with high-quality evidence supporting its content validity, structural validity, and internal consistency. Notably, the primary goal of this instrument is to assess the overall symptom burden.

Conclusions

There is a notable lack of fully validated, high-quality instruments for measuring the symptoms themselves in patients undergoing immunotherapy. Although the FACT-ICM is the most promising tool for assessing the overall symptom burden, it still requires further validation. Therefore, future research, depending on the specific objective, should focus on two key areas: more comprehensive validation of the FACT-ICM, and the validation or development of instruments specifically designed to quantify the symptoms themselves.

Systematic review registration

PROSPERO (CRD420250655464).
目的:确定和评价用于癌症患者免疫治疗症状评估的患者报告结果测量(PROMs)的方法学质量和心理测量学特性。方法:系统检索PubMed、Scopus、Cochrane Library、Web of Science、Embase、CINAHL、CNKI、万方、Vip、中国医学信息网(SinoMed)自成立至2025年2月10日的数据库。资格标准要求研究集中于开发或验证PROM用于接受免疫治疗的成年癌症患者的症状评估,并报告至少一项心理测量学性质。采用COSMIN 2.0指南对纳入研究的方法学质量和相应工具的心理测量特性进行评估。我们综合了来自同一PROM的所有纳入研究的与每个测量属性相关的证据。证据质量的评价是基于一个改编的分级建议评估,发展和评价系统。结果:最终分析包括8项研究,报告了6个PROMs。由于没有足够的高质量证据,特别是在跨文化效度/测量不变性和测量误差方面,因此不能推荐使用任何仪器。然而,癌症治疗-免疫检查点调节剂的功能评估(FACT-ICM)显示出最大的潜力,有高质量的证据支持其内容效度、结构效度和内部一致性。值得注意的是,该工具的主要目标是评估总体症状负担。结论:在接受免疫治疗的患者中,明显缺乏完全有效的、高质量的测量症状本身的仪器。尽管FACT-ICM是评估总体症状负担的最有希望的工具,但它仍需要进一步验证。因此,根据具体目标,未来的研究应侧重于两个关键领域:更全面地验证FACT-ICM,以及验证或开发专门设计用于量化症状本身的工具。系统评价注册:PROSPERO (CRD420250655464)。
{"title":"Psychometric properties of patient-reported outcome measures for symptom assessment in patients with cancer receiving immunotherapy: A systematic review following the COSMIN 2.0 guidelines","authors":"Defa Zhang ,&nbsp;Yali Wang ,&nbsp;Qian Wang ,&nbsp;Huiqing Mao ,&nbsp;Miaomiao Zhang ,&nbsp;Ping Xu ,&nbsp;Shuo Guo ,&nbsp;Rong Yan","doi":"10.1016/j.apjon.2025.100774","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.apjon.2025.100774","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><div>To identify and evaluate the methodological quality and psychometric properties of Patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) for symptom assessment in patients with cancer undergoing immunotherapy.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>A systematic search was performed in PubMed, Scopus, Cochrane Library, Web of Science, Embase, CINAHL, CNKI, WanFang, Vip, and SinoMed from their inception to February 10, 2025. Eligibility criteria required studies to focus on the development or validation of a PROM for symptom assessment in adult patients with cancer undergoing immunotherapy, and to report on at least one psychometric property. The methodological quality of the included studies and the psychometric properties of the corresponding instruments were evaluated using the COSMIN 2.0 guidelines.We synthesized the evidence pertaining to each measurement property from all included studies on the same PROM.The evidence quality was evaluated based on an adapted Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation system.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>The final analysis included eight studies that reported on six PROMs. Because there was insufficient high-quality evidence, particularly for cross-cultural validity/measurement invariance and measurement error, no instrument could be recommended for use. However, the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Immune Checkpoint Modulator (FACT-ICM) demonstrated the most potential, with high-quality evidence supporting its content validity, structural validity, and internal consistency. Notably, the primary goal of this instrument is to assess the overall symptom burden.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>There is a notable lack of fully validated, high-quality instruments for measuring the symptoms themselves in patients undergoing immunotherapy. Although the FACT-ICM is the most promising tool for assessing the overall symptom burden, it still requires further validation. Therefore, future research, depending on the specific objective, should focus on two key areas: more comprehensive validation of the FACT-ICM, and the validation or development of instruments specifically designed to quantify the symptoms themselves.</div></div><div><h3>Systematic review registration</h3><div>PROSPERO (CRD420250655464).</div></div>","PeriodicalId":8569,"journal":{"name":"Asia-Pacific Journal of Oncology Nursing","volume":"12 ","pages":"Article 100774"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8,"publicationDate":"2025-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145013835","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
End-of-life care in the home: A realistic or unachievable goal? 居家临终关怀:一个现实的还是无法实现的目标?
IF 2.8 3区 医学 Q1 NURSING Pub Date : 2025-12-01 DOI: 10.1016/j.apjon.2025.100779
Geraldine A. Lee , Priya Reehal , Xianliang Liu
{"title":"End-of-life care in the home: A realistic or unachievable goal?","authors":"Geraldine A. Lee ,&nbsp;Priya Reehal ,&nbsp;Xianliang Liu","doi":"10.1016/j.apjon.2025.100779","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.apjon.2025.100779","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":8569,"journal":{"name":"Asia-Pacific Journal of Oncology Nursing","volume":"12 ","pages":"Article 100779"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8,"publicationDate":"2025-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145111899","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Coping with bowel dysfunction after low anterior resection for rectal cancer: A qualitative synthesis 直肠癌低位前切除术后肠功能障碍的应对:定性综合。
IF 2.8 3区 医学 Q1 NURSING Pub Date : 2025-12-01 DOI: 10.1016/j.apjon.2025.100787
Eun Young Kim , Min Jeong Kim , Young Man Kim

Objective

This study synthesized existing qualitative research on patients’ experiences of bowel dysfunction following low anterior resection for rectal cancer and examined the strategies they use to cope and adapt to related challenges.

Methods

A comprehensive search was conducted across PubMed, EMBASE, CINAHL, SCOPUS, Web of Science, and the Cochrane Library for qualitative studies published up to June 2025, supplemented by reference screening. A meta-ethnographic approach was employed to integrate findings interpretively while preserving the contextual depth of individual studies.

Results

Twenty-two studies involving 415 participants were included. Three overarching themes emerged: (1) living with uncertainty, (2) experiencing social isolation and disconnection, and (3) striving to establish a new balance in life. Patients reported unpredictable bowel symptoms that disrupted daily activities, generating uncertainty, social withdrawal, and psychological distress. Despite these challenges, patients gradually adapted through self-care practices, emotional support, and psychological acceptance, which facilitated a shift toward stability and improved quality of life.

Conclusions

Bowel dysfunction after low anterior resection imposes substantial physical, psychological, and social challenges on patients. Supporting adaptation requires patient-centered nursing interventions that extend beyond symptom management to provide comprehensive psychosocial support, promote self-care, and enhance long-term well-being.

Systematic review registration

PROSPERO CRD42024590342.
目的:本研究综合已有的直肠癌低位前切除术后患者肠功能障碍经历的定性研究,探讨患者应对和适应相关挑战的策略。方法:综合检索PubMed、EMBASE、CINAHL、SCOPUS、Web of Science和Cochrane Library,检索截至2025年6月发表的定性研究,并辅以参考文献筛选。采用元民族志方法,在保留个体研究的背景深度的同时,对研究结果进行解释性整合。结果:共纳入22项研究,涉及415名受试者。三个主要的主题出现了:(1)生活在不确定性中,(2)经历社会孤立和脱节,(3)努力在生活中建立新的平衡。患者报告了不可预测的肠道症状,扰乱了日常活动,产生不确定性、社交退缩和心理困扰。尽管存在这些挑战,但患者通过自我护理实践、情感支持和心理接受逐渐适应,从而促进了向稳定和提高生活质量的转变。结论:低位前切除术后肠功能障碍给患者带来了巨大的生理、心理和社会挑战。支持适应需要以患者为中心的护理干预措施,这些干预措施应超越症状管理,提供全面的社会心理支持,促进自我保健,并增强长期福祉。系统评价注册:PROSPERO CRD42024590342。
{"title":"Coping with bowel dysfunction after low anterior resection for rectal cancer: A qualitative synthesis","authors":"Eun Young Kim ,&nbsp;Min Jeong Kim ,&nbsp;Young Man Kim","doi":"10.1016/j.apjon.2025.100787","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.apjon.2025.100787","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><div>This study synthesized existing qualitative research on patients’ experiences of bowel dysfunction following low anterior resection for rectal cancer and examined the strategies they use to cope and adapt to related challenges.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>A comprehensive search was conducted across PubMed, EMBASE, CINAHL, SCOPUS, Web of Science, and the Cochrane Library for qualitative studies published up to June 2025, supplemented by reference screening. A meta-ethnographic approach was employed to integrate findings interpretively while preserving the contextual depth of individual studies.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Twenty-two studies involving 415 participants were included. Three overarching themes emerged: (1) living with uncertainty, (2) experiencing social isolation and disconnection, and (3) striving to establish a new balance in life. Patients reported unpredictable bowel symptoms that disrupted daily activities, generating uncertainty, social withdrawal, and psychological distress. Despite these challenges, patients gradually adapted through self-care practices, emotional support, and psychological acceptance, which facilitated a shift toward stability and improved quality of life.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Bowel dysfunction after low anterior resection imposes substantial physical, psychological, and social challenges on patients. Supporting adaptation requires patient-centered nursing interventions that extend beyond symptom management to provide comprehensive psychosocial support, promote self-care, and enhance long-term well-being.</div></div><div><h3>Systematic review registration</h3><div>PROSPERO CRD42024590342.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":8569,"journal":{"name":"Asia-Pacific Journal of Oncology Nursing","volume":"12 ","pages":"Article 100787"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8,"publicationDate":"2025-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145290851","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
期刊
Asia-Pacific Journal of Oncology Nursing
全部 Acc. Chem. Res. ACS Applied Bio Materials ACS Appl. Electron. Mater. ACS Appl. Energy Mater. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces ACS Appl. Nano Mater. ACS Appl. Polym. Mater. ACS BIOMATER-SCI ENG ACS Catal. ACS Cent. Sci. ACS Chem. Biol. ACS Chemical Health & Safety ACS Chem. Neurosci. ACS Comb. Sci. ACS Earth Space Chem. ACS Energy Lett. ACS Infect. Dis. ACS Macro Lett. ACS Mater. Lett. ACS Med. Chem. Lett. ACS Nano ACS Omega ACS Photonics ACS Sens. ACS Sustainable Chem. Eng. ACS Synth. Biol. Anal. Chem. BIOCHEMISTRY-US Bioconjugate Chem. BIOMACROMOLECULES Chem. Res. Toxicol. Chem. Rev. Chem. Mater. CRYST GROWTH DES ENERG FUEL Environ. Sci. Technol. Environ. Sci. Technol. Lett. Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. IND ENG CHEM RES Inorg. Chem. J. Agric. Food. Chem. J. Chem. Eng. Data J. Chem. Educ. J. Chem. Inf. Model. J. Chem. Theory Comput. J. Med. Chem. J. Nat. Prod. J PROTEOME RES J. Am. Chem. Soc. LANGMUIR MACROMOLECULES Mol. Pharmaceutics Nano Lett. Org. Lett. ORG PROCESS RES DEV ORGANOMETALLICS J. Org. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. A J. Phys. Chem. B J. Phys. Chem. C J. Phys. Chem. Lett. Analyst Anal. Methods Biomater. Sci. Catal. Sci. Technol. Chem. Commun. Chem. Soc. Rev. CHEM EDUC RES PRACT CRYSTENGCOMM Dalton Trans. Energy Environ. Sci. ENVIRON SCI-NANO ENVIRON SCI-PROC IMP ENVIRON SCI-WAT RES Faraday Discuss. Food Funct. Green Chem. Inorg. Chem. Front. Integr. Biol. J. Anal. At. Spectrom. J. Mater. Chem. A J. Mater. Chem. B J. Mater. Chem. C Lab Chip Mater. Chem. Front. Mater. Horiz. MEDCHEMCOMM Metallomics Mol. Biosyst. Mol. Syst. Des. Eng. Nanoscale Nanoscale Horiz. Nat. Prod. Rep. New J. Chem. Org. Biomol. Chem. Org. Chem. Front. PHOTOCH PHOTOBIO SCI PCCP Polym. Chem.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1