首页 > 最新文献

Australian and New Zealand Journal of Psychiatry最新文献

英文 中文
Policy implications of the 2020-22 Australian study of mental health and wellbeing. 2020-22 年澳大利亚心理健康与幸福研究的政策影响。
IF 4 2区 医学 Q1 PSYCHIATRY Pub Date : 2024-11-07 DOI: 10.1177/00048674241292961
Maree Teesson, Harvey Whiteford, Marlee Bower, Scarlett Smout, Philip Burgess, Meredith G Harris, Jane Pirkis, Sandra Diminic, Andrew Baillie, Tim Slade, Cath Chapman

The objective of this paper is to summarise the policy implications of key findings from the 2020-22 Australian National Study of Mental Health and Wellbeing (NSMHWB). We provide an analysis of policy implications of four papers in this issue of the journal from the 2020-22 NSMHWB (N = 15,893) and the 2007 NSMHWB (N = 8841). The 2020-2022 NSMHWB reported a lifetime prevalence rate of common mental disorders of 40.2% (95% confidence interval [CI] = 39.2-41.3) and 12-month prevalence rate of 20.2% (95% CI 19.5-21.0). Overall, adult Australians were significantly more likely to experience a 12-month mental disorder in 2020-22 compared with 2007, with the change most striking in among those aged 16-24 years (odds ratio [OR] 1.2, 95% CI 1.1-1.3). Individuals aged 16-24 years in 2020-22 were significantly more likely to experience a 12-month anxiety disorder (OR 2.9, 95% CI = 2.3-3.7, depressive disorder (OR 2.8 95% CI = 2.1-3.9) or comorbidity (relative risk [RR] = 1.4, 95% CI = 1.2-1.7) compared with those aged 16-24 years in 2007. In 2020-22, the proportion of Australians who had experienced suicidal ideation, suicide plans and suicide attempts in the past 12 months was 3.3%, 1.1% and 0.3%. Under half (46.5% 95% CI 44.1-48.8) of adults with a 12-month mental disorder sought treatment. Mental disorders remain an endemic feature of Australia's overall health landscape and appear to be increasing, especially in younger cohorts. While service use rates have improved over time, there is still some way to go. Epidemiological surveys such as the 2020-22 NSMHWB are important for understanding changing prevalence and the population not accessing services. Innovative prevention and treatment strategies will be needed to address the increasing rates of disorders in younger Australian adults. Equally innovative and bold policy responses will be essential.

本文旨在总结2020-22年澳大利亚全国心理健康与幸福研究(NSMHWB)的主要研究成果对政策的影响。我们在本期期刊上对 2020-22 年澳大利亚国家心理健康与幸福研究(NSMHWB)(N = 15893)和 2007 年澳大利亚国家心理健康与幸福研究(NSMHWB)(N = 8841)的四篇论文的政策影响进行了分析。2020-2022年全国精神健康状况调查报告显示,常见精神障碍的终生患病率为40.2%(95%置信区间[CI] = 39.2-41.3),12个月患病率为20.2%(95%置信区间[CI] = 19.5-21.0)。总体而言,与 2007 年相比,2020-22 年澳大利亚成年人在 12 个月内出现精神障碍的几率明显增加,其中 16-24 岁人群的变化最为显著(几率比 [OR] 1.2,95% CI 1.1-1.3)。与 2007 年的 16-24 岁人群相比,2020-22 年的 16-24 岁人群在 12 个月内出现焦虑症(OR 2.9,95% CI = 2.3-3.7)、抑郁症(OR 2.8,95% CI = 2.1-3.9)或合并症(相对风险 [RR] = 1.4,95% CI = 1.2-1.7)的可能性明显更高。2020-22 年,在过去 12 个月中有过自杀意念、自杀计划和自杀未遂的澳大利亚人比例分别为 3.3%、1.1% 和 0.3%。在 12 个月内患有精神障碍的成年人中,不到一半(46.5% 95% CI 44.1-48.8)的人寻求过治疗。精神障碍仍然是澳大利亚总体健康状况的一个地方性特征,而且似乎还在不断增加,尤其是在年轻群体中。虽然随着时间的推移,服务使用率有所提高,但仍有一段路要走。流行病学调查(如 2020-22 年国家卫生与健康调查)对于了解不断变化的患病率和未获得服务的人群非常重要。要应对澳大利亚年轻成年人中日益增长的失调症发病率,就必须采取创新的预防和治疗策略。同样,创新和大胆的政策应对措施也至关重要。
{"title":"Policy implications of the 2020-22 Australian study of mental health and wellbeing.","authors":"Maree Teesson, Harvey Whiteford, Marlee Bower, Scarlett Smout, Philip Burgess, Meredith G Harris, Jane Pirkis, Sandra Diminic, Andrew Baillie, Tim Slade, Cath Chapman","doi":"10.1177/00048674241292961","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1177/00048674241292961","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The objective of this paper is to summarise the policy implications of key findings from the 2020-22 Australian National Study of Mental Health and Wellbeing (NSMHWB). We provide an analysis of policy implications of four papers in this issue of the journal from the 2020-22 NSMHWB (<i>N</i> = 15,893) and the 2007 NSMHWB (<i>N</i> = 8841). The 2020-2022 NSMHWB reported a lifetime prevalence rate of common mental disorders of 40.2% (95% confidence interval [CI] = 39.2-41.3) and 12-month prevalence rate of 20.2% (95% CI 19.5-21.0). Overall, adult Australians were significantly more likely to experience a 12-month mental disorder in 2020-22 compared with 2007, with the change most striking in among those aged 16-24 years (odds ratio [OR] 1.2, 95% CI 1.1-1.3). Individuals aged 16-24 years in 2020-22 were significantly more likely to experience a 12-month anxiety disorder (OR 2.9, 95% CI = 2.3-3.7, depressive disorder (OR 2.8 95% CI = 2.1-3.9) or comorbidity (relative risk [RR] = 1.4, 95% CI = 1.2-1.7) compared with those aged 16-24 years in 2007. In 2020-22, the proportion of Australians who had experienced suicidal ideation, suicide plans and suicide attempts in the past 12 months was 3.3%, 1.1% and 0.3%. Under half (46.5% 95% CI 44.1-48.8) of adults with a 12-month mental disorder sought treatment. Mental disorders remain an endemic feature of Australia's overall health landscape and appear to be increasing, especially in younger cohorts. While service use rates have improved over time, there is still some way to go. Epidemiological surveys such as the 2020-22 NSMHWB are important for understanding changing prevalence and the population not accessing services. Innovative prevention and treatment strategies will be needed to address the increasing rates of disorders in younger Australian adults. Equally innovative and bold policy responses will be essential.</p>","PeriodicalId":8589,"journal":{"name":"Australian and New Zealand Journal of Psychiatry","volume":" ","pages":"48674241292961"},"PeriodicalIF":4.0,"publicationDate":"2024-11-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142602895","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
The psychosocial impacts of the 15 March terrorist attack on the Christchurch Muslim community: A descriptive, cross-sectional assessment. 3 月 15 日恐怖袭击对基督城穆斯林社区的社会心理影响:描述性横断面评估。
IF 4 2区 医学 Q1 PSYCHIATRY Pub Date : 2024-11-01 Epub Date: 2024-09-08 DOI: 10.1177/00048674241276802
Ruqayya Sulaiman-Hill, Philip J Schluter, Sandila Tanveer, Joseph M Boden, Richard Porter, Ben Beaglehole, Shaystah Dean, Zimna Thaufeeg, Caroline Bell

Objective: On 15 March 2019, a white supremacist terrorist carried out sequential attacks on two mosques in Christchurch, New Zealand during Friday prayers. This resulted in the loss of 51 lives, 40 others sustained gunshot injuries, and there were approximately 250 survivors. This study aimed to evaluate the impacts on community members, assess clinical needs, facilitate access to appropriate interventions and provide insights into working with a traumatised and diverse population.

Methods: This cross-sectional study used semi-structured clinical interviews and self-report measures to assess social and demographic factors, mental health disorders and well-being for adult Muslims 11-32 months post-attack.

Results: A total of 189 participants completed assessments. The sample was diverse, representing 34 different ethnicities and participant proximity to the attack was complex, with personal and familial exposures. Elevated levels of psychological distress and psychopathology were found with 38% of participants reporting moderate/severe psychological distress on the Kessler-10, 39% reporting post-traumatic stress disorder on the post-traumatic stress disorder checklist-5, and 40% reporting poor well-being or possible depression on the World Health Organization-5 Well Being Index. Secondary stressors were also documented, as well as high scores for post-traumatic growth and the importance of faith.

Conclusion: This study provides valuable insights into the repercussions of the Christchurch mosque attack on the affected community, describing the complexity of exposure and the substantial burden of morbidity experienced. It also highlights the high levels of social connectedness and the role of faith in promoting positive outcomes in the recovery process for this population.

目标2019 年 3 月 15 日,一名白人至上主义恐怖分子在星期五祈祷期间连续袭击了新西兰克赖斯特彻奇的两座清真寺。袭击造成 51 人死亡,40 人受枪伤,约 250 人幸存。这项研究旨在评估对社区成员造成的影响,评估临床需求,促进获得适当的干预措施,并为与遭受创伤的不同人群打交道提供见解:这项横断面研究采用半结构化临床访谈和自我报告测量方法,对袭击发生后 11-32 个月的成年穆斯林的社会和人口因素、心理健康障碍和幸福感进行评估:共有 189 名参与者完成了评估。样本具有多样性,代表了 34 个不同的种族,参与者与袭击事件的关系错综复杂,既有个人因素,也有家庭因素。38%的受试者在凯斯勒-10(Kessler-10)测验中报告了中度/重度心理压力,39%的受试者在创伤后应激障碍检查表-5(Post-traumatic stress disorder checklist-5)中报告了创伤后应激障碍,40%的受试者在世界卫生组织-5幸福指数(World Health Organization-5 Well Being Index)中报告了幸福感较差或可能患有抑郁症。此外,还记录了次要压力源,以及创伤后成长和信仰重要性的高分:本研究为了解基督城清真寺袭击事件对受影响社区的影响提供了宝贵的见解,描述了受影响的复杂性和所经历的巨大发病负担。研究还强调了社会关系的高度关联性以及信仰在促进该群体恢复过程中取得积极成果方面的作用。
{"title":"The psychosocial impacts of the 15 March terrorist attack on the Christchurch Muslim community: A descriptive, cross-sectional assessment.","authors":"Ruqayya Sulaiman-Hill, Philip J Schluter, Sandila Tanveer, Joseph M Boden, Richard Porter, Ben Beaglehole, Shaystah Dean, Zimna Thaufeeg, Caroline Bell","doi":"10.1177/00048674241276802","DOIUrl":"10.1177/00048674241276802","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>On 15 March 2019, a white supremacist terrorist carried out sequential attacks on two mosques in Christchurch, New Zealand during Friday prayers. This resulted in the loss of 51 lives, 40 others sustained gunshot injuries, and there were approximately 250 survivors. This study aimed to evaluate the impacts on community members, assess clinical needs, facilitate access to appropriate interventions and provide insights into working with a traumatised and diverse population.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This cross-sectional study used semi-structured clinical interviews and self-report measures to assess social and demographic factors, mental health disorders and well-being for adult Muslims 11-32 months post-attack.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 189 participants completed assessments. The sample was diverse, representing 34 different ethnicities and participant proximity to the attack was complex, with personal and familial exposures. Elevated levels of psychological distress and psychopathology were found with 38% of participants reporting moderate/severe psychological distress on the Kessler-10, 39% reporting post-traumatic stress disorder on the post-traumatic stress disorder checklist-5, and 40% reporting poor well-being or possible depression on the World Health Organization-5 Well Being Index. Secondary stressors were also documented, as well as high scores for post-traumatic growth and the importance of faith.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This study provides valuable insights into the repercussions of the Christchurch mosque attack on the affected community, describing the complexity of exposure and the substantial burden of morbidity experienced. It also highlights the high levels of social connectedness and the role of faith in promoting positive outcomes in the recovery process for this population.</p>","PeriodicalId":8589,"journal":{"name":"Australian and New Zealand Journal of Psychiatry","volume":" ","pages":"977-989"},"PeriodicalIF":4.0,"publicationDate":"2024-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11504151/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142153077","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Research Letter: Limited additional serious adverse events associated with concomitant immunomodulatory treatment in people with atypical psychiatric disease. 研究信:与非典型精神病患者同时接受免疫调节剂治疗相关的额外严重不良事件有限。
IF 4 2区 医学 Q1 PSYCHIATRY Pub Date : 2024-11-01 Epub Date: 2024-09-03 DOI: 10.1177/00048674241271969
Parisa Fani-Molky, Jocelyn Jiang, Sabrina Naz, David Brown, Anthony Harris
{"title":"Research Letter: Limited additional serious adverse events associated with concomitant immunomodulatory treatment in people with atypical psychiatric disease.","authors":"Parisa Fani-Molky, Jocelyn Jiang, Sabrina Naz, David Brown, Anthony Harris","doi":"10.1177/00048674241271969","DOIUrl":"10.1177/00048674241271969","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":8589,"journal":{"name":"Australian and New Zealand Journal of Psychiatry","volume":" ","pages":"1001-1007"},"PeriodicalIF":4.0,"publicationDate":"2024-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11497740/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142118888","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Ethnic disparities in mental health problems in New Caledonia and French Polynesia. 新喀里多尼亚和法属波利尼西亚在心理健康问题上的种族差异。
IF 4 2区 医学 Q1 PSYCHIATRY Pub Date : 2024-11-01 Epub Date: 2024-07-31 DOI: 10.1177/00048674241267238
Déborah Sebbane, Marielle Wathelet, Stéphane Amadeo, Benjamin Goodfellow, Jean-Luc Roelandt, Paul Dourgnon, Karine Chevreul

Objectives: Indigenous people experience poorer mental health compared to the general population. Socioeconomic gaps partly explain these disparities. However, there is variability between populations and French overseas territories are understudied. This study examines the prevalence of mental health problems among Indigenous people in New Caledonia and French Polynesia, describing and comparing it with that of their counterparts while considering associated factors.

Methods: We used the data from the cross-sectional Mental Health in the General Population survey in the only 3 sites for which information on indigenous status was available: Noumea (2006) and the 'Bush' (2008) in New Caledonia, and French Polynesia (2015-2017). Current mental health issues were screened using the Mini-International Neuropsychiatric Interview. In multivariable analyses, we considered the following factors: gender, age, education level, marital status, occupational activity and monthly income.

Results: Overall, 2294 participants were analysed. Among the 1379 indigenous participants, 52.3% had at least one mental health issue. The prevalence of depressive disorder (18.0% vs 11.7%), alcohol use disorder (16.7% vs 11.7%) and suicide risk (22.3% vs 16.7%) were higher among indigenous participants compared to non-indigenous participants. After adjustment, the association between indigenous status and these mental health issues did not persist, except for alcohol use disorder.

Conclusion: We found higher prevalence of depressive disorder, alcohol use disorder and suicide risk among indigenous people of French Polynesia and New Caledonia compared to their counterparts. These differences seemed largely explained by socioeconomic disparities. Future studies could explore the use of and access to healthcare by indigenous populations.

目标:与普通人相比,原住民的心理健康状况较差。社会经济差距是造成这些差异的部分原因。然而,不同人群之间存在差异,法属海外领地的研究也不足。本研究调查了新喀里多尼亚和法属波利尼西亚土著居民的精神健康问题发生率,在考虑相关因素的同时对其进行了描述并与同类人群进行了比较:我们使用了在仅有的 3 个有土著身份信息的地点进行的 "普通人群心理健康 "横断面调查的数据:新喀里多尼亚的努美阿(2006 年)和 "丛林"(2008 年),以及法属波利尼西亚(2015-2017 年)。目前的精神健康问题通过 "小型国际神经精神病学访谈"(Mini-International Neuropsychiatric Interview)进行筛查。在多变量分析中,我们考虑了以下因素:性别、年龄、教育程度、婚姻状况、职业活动和月收入:共对 2294 名参与者进行了分析。在 1379 名原住民参与者中,52.3% 的人至少有一个心理健康问题。与非土著参与者相比,土著参与者中抑郁障碍(18.0% 对 11.7%)、酗酒障碍(16.7% 对 11.7%)和自杀风险(22.3% 对 16.7%)的发病率更高。经过调整后,除酗酒障碍外,原住民身份与这些心理健康问题之间的关联并未持续存在:我们发现,法属波利尼西亚和新喀里多尼亚原住民的抑郁障碍、酗酒障碍和自杀风险的患病率高于非原住民。这些差异似乎在很大程度上是由社会经济差异造成的。未来的研究可以探讨原住民使用和获得医疗保健的情况。
{"title":"Ethnic disparities in mental health problems in New Caledonia and French Polynesia.","authors":"Déborah Sebbane, Marielle Wathelet, Stéphane Amadeo, Benjamin Goodfellow, Jean-Luc Roelandt, Paul Dourgnon, Karine Chevreul","doi":"10.1177/00048674241267238","DOIUrl":"10.1177/00048674241267238","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Indigenous people experience poorer mental health compared to the general population. Socioeconomic gaps partly explain these disparities. However, there is variability between populations and French overseas territories are understudied. This study examines the prevalence of mental health problems among Indigenous people in New Caledonia and French Polynesia, describing and comparing it with that of their counterparts while considering associated factors.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We used the data from the cross-sectional <i>Mental Health in the General Population</i> survey in the only 3 sites for which information on indigenous status was available: Noumea (2006) and the 'Bush' (2008) in New Caledonia, and French Polynesia (2015-2017). Current mental health issues were screened using the <i>Mini-International Neuropsychiatric Interview</i>. In multivariable analyses, we considered the following factors: gender, age, education level, marital status, occupational activity and monthly income.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Overall, 2294 participants were analysed. Among the 1379 indigenous participants, 52.3% had at least one mental health issue. The prevalence of depressive disorder (18.0% vs 11.7%), alcohol use disorder (16.7% vs 11.7%) and suicide risk (22.3% vs 16.7%) were higher among indigenous participants compared to non-indigenous participants. After adjustment, the association between indigenous status and these mental health issues did not persist, except for alcohol use disorder.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>We found higher prevalence of depressive disorder, alcohol use disorder and suicide risk among indigenous people of French Polynesia and New Caledonia compared to their counterparts. These differences seemed largely explained by socioeconomic disparities. Future studies could explore the use of and access to healthcare by indigenous populations.</p>","PeriodicalId":8589,"journal":{"name":"Australian and New Zealand Journal of Psychiatry","volume":" ","pages":"952-962"},"PeriodicalIF":4.0,"publicationDate":"2024-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141858936","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Serving our community, reaching out to our region. 服务我们的社区,深入我们的地区。
IF 4 2区 医学 Q1 PSYCHIATRY Pub Date : 2024-11-01 Epub Date: 2024-10-11 DOI: 10.1177/00048674241291316
Steve Kisely
{"title":"Serving our community, reaching out to our region.","authors":"Steve Kisely","doi":"10.1177/00048674241291316","DOIUrl":"10.1177/00048674241291316","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":8589,"journal":{"name":"Australian and New Zealand Journal of Psychiatry","volume":" ","pages":"925-926"},"PeriodicalIF":4.0,"publicationDate":"2024-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142399148","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Letter to the Editor: Letter to the editor regarding 'A revisionist model for treatment-resistant and difficult-to-treat depression'. 致编辑的信:致编辑的信,内容涉及 "治疗耐药和难治抑郁症的修正主义模式"。
IF 4 2区 医学 Q1 PSYCHIATRY Pub Date : 2024-11-01 Epub Date: 2024-08-21 DOI: 10.1177/00048674241271919
Stephen Rosenman
{"title":"Letter to the Editor: Letter to the editor regarding 'A revisionist model for treatment-resistant and difficult-to-treat depression'.","authors":"Stephen Rosenman","doi":"10.1177/00048674241271919","DOIUrl":"10.1177/00048674241271919","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":8589,"journal":{"name":"Australian and New Zealand Journal of Psychiatry","volume":" ","pages":"1008"},"PeriodicalIF":4.0,"publicationDate":"2024-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142016231","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
The physical health and premature mortality of Indigenous Māori following first-episode psychosis diagnosis: A 15-year follow-up study. 土著毛利人在首次被诊断为精神病后的身体健康和过早死亡率:15年跟踪研究。
IF 4 2区 医学 Q1 PSYCHIATRY Pub Date : 2024-11-01 Epub Date: 2024-08-21 DOI: 10.1177/00048674241270981
Nathan J Monk, Ruth Cunningham, James Stanley, Sue Crengle, Julie Fitzjohn, Melissa Kerdemelidis, Helen Lockett, Andre D McLachlan, Waikaremoana Waitoki, Cameron Lacey

Background: People experiencing psychosis are at greater risk of physical health conditions and premature mortality. It is likely that Indigenous Māori youth, who experience additional systemic inequities caused by settler-colonisation, face even greater physical health and mortality risks following a diagnosis of first-episode psychosis.

Objective: Compare Māori and non-Māori for risk of hospitalisation and mortality for up to 15 years following first-episode psychosis diagnosis.

Methods: A cohort (N = 14,122) of young people (16-24 years) with first-episode psychosis diagnosis between 2001 and 2019 were identified. Using crude Kaplan-Meier and adjusted Cox proportional hazards models, Māori (n = 5211) and non-Māori (n = 8911) were compared on hospitalisation and mortality outcomes for up to 15 years.

Results: In the 15 years following first-episode psychosis diagnosis, Māori had higher adjusted risk of all-cause mortality (hazard ratio = 1.21, 95% confidence interval = [1.01, 1.45]), hospitalisation with diabetes (hazard ratio = 1.44, 95% confidence interval = [1.15, 1.79]), injury/poisoning (hazard ratio = 1.11, 95% confidence interval = [1.05, 1.16]), general physical health conditions (hazard ratio = 1.07, 95% confidence interval = [1.02, 1.13]) and also appeared to be at greater risk of cardiovascular hospitalisations (hazard ratio = 1.34, 95% confidence interval = [0.97, 1.86]). Kaplan-Meier plots show hospitalisation and mortality inequities emerging approximately 4-7 years following first-episode psychosis diagnosis.

Conclusions: Māori are at greater risk for hospitalisation and premature mortality outcomes following first-episode psychosis. Early screening and intervention, facilitated by culturally safe health service delivery, is needed to target these inequities early.

背景:精神病患者罹患身体健康疾病和过早死亡的风险更大。原住民毛利青年可能会面临更大的身体健康风险和死亡风险,因为他们经历了定居者殖民化造成的更多系统性不平等:比较毛利人和非毛利人在首次精神病诊断后长达15年的住院和死亡风险:方法:对2001年至2019年期间首次被诊断为精神病的年轻人(16-24岁)进行队列研究(N = 14,122)。使用粗略卡普兰-梅耶尔模型和调整后的考克斯比例危险模型,比较了毛利人(n = 5211)和非毛利人(n = 8911)长达15年的住院和死亡结果:结果:在首次诊断出精神病后的15年中,毛利人的全因死亡(危险比=1.21,95%置信区间=[1.01, 1.45])、糖尿病住院(危险比=1.44,95%置信区间=[1.15, 1.79])、受伤/中毒(危险比=1.11,95% 置信区间 = [1.05,1.16])、一般身体健康状况(危险比 = 1.07,95% 置信区间 = [1.02,1.13]),而且心血管病住院风险似乎更高(危险比 = 1.34,95% 置信区间 = [0.97,1.86])。Kaplan-Meier图显示,在首次诊断出精神病后的4-7年左右,出现了住院和死亡率不平等的现象:结论:毛利人在首次发病后住院和过早死亡的风险更大。为了及早发现这些不平等现象,需要在提供文化安全的医疗服务的同时进行早期筛查和干预。
{"title":"The physical health and premature mortality of Indigenous Māori following first-episode psychosis diagnosis: A 15-year follow-up study.","authors":"Nathan J Monk, Ruth Cunningham, James Stanley, Sue Crengle, Julie Fitzjohn, Melissa Kerdemelidis, Helen Lockett, Andre D McLachlan, Waikaremoana Waitoki, Cameron Lacey","doi":"10.1177/00048674241270981","DOIUrl":"10.1177/00048674241270981","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>People experiencing psychosis are at greater risk of physical health conditions and premature mortality. It is likely that Indigenous Māori youth, who experience additional systemic inequities caused by settler-colonisation, face even greater physical health and mortality risks following a diagnosis of first-episode psychosis.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>Compare Māori and non-Māori for risk of hospitalisation and mortality for up to 15 years following first-episode psychosis diagnosis.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A cohort (<i>N</i> = 14,122) of young people (16-24 years) with first-episode psychosis diagnosis between 2001 and 2019 were identified. Using crude Kaplan-Meier and adjusted Cox proportional hazards models, Māori (<i>n</i> = 5211) and non-Māori (<i>n</i> = 8911) were compared on hospitalisation and mortality outcomes for up to 15 years.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In the 15 years following first-episode psychosis diagnosis, Māori had higher adjusted risk of all-cause mortality (hazard ratio = 1.21, 95% confidence interval = [1.01, 1.45]), hospitalisation with diabetes (hazard ratio = 1.44, 95% confidence interval = [1.15, 1.79]), injury/poisoning (hazard ratio = 1.11, 95% confidence interval = [1.05, 1.16]), general physical health conditions (hazard ratio = 1.07, 95% confidence interval = [1.02, 1.13]) and also appeared to be at greater risk of cardiovascular hospitalisations (hazard ratio = 1.34, 95% confidence interval = [0.97, 1.86]). Kaplan-Meier plots show hospitalisation and mortality inequities emerging approximately 4-7 years following first-episode psychosis diagnosis.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Māori are at greater risk for hospitalisation and premature mortality outcomes following first-episode psychosis. Early screening and intervention, facilitated by culturally safe health service delivery, is needed to target these inequities early.</p>","PeriodicalId":8589,"journal":{"name":"Australian and New Zealand Journal of Psychiatry","volume":" ","pages":"963-976"},"PeriodicalIF":4.0,"publicationDate":"2024-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11529131/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142016204","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Letter to the Editor: Author reply to Letter to the Editor regarding 'A revisionist model for treatment-resistant and difficult-to-treat depression'. 致编辑的信:作者就 "治疗耐药和难治抑郁症的修正主义模式 "致编辑的回信。
IF 4 2区 医学 Q1 PSYCHIATRY Pub Date : 2024-11-01 Epub Date: 2024-09-08 DOI: 10.1177/00048674241276419
Gordon Parker
{"title":"Letter to the Editor: Author reply to Letter to the Editor regarding 'A revisionist model for treatment-resistant and difficult-to-treat depression'.","authors":"Gordon Parker","doi":"10.1177/00048674241276419","DOIUrl":"10.1177/00048674241276419","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":8589,"journal":{"name":"Australian and New Zealand Journal of Psychiatry","volume":" ","pages":"1010"},"PeriodicalIF":4.0,"publicationDate":"2024-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142153075","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Do compulsory mental health patients have a right to receive a second opinion on their treatment under Australian mental health legislation? 根据澳大利亚精神健康立法,强制精神疾病患者是否有权就其治疗获得第二意见?
IF 4 2区 医学 Q1 PSYCHIATRY Pub Date : 2024-11-01 Epub Date: 2024-08-02 DOI: 10.1177/00048674241267219
Sam Boyle, Emma Cockburn, Bianca Mandeville

We reviewed Australian mental health legislation to determine what obligations it places on psychiatrists to facilitate second opinions for compulsory patients who request them. Only four jurisdictions-Australian Capital Territory, Queensland, Victoria, and Western Australia-have legislated for 'patient-initiated' second opinions. Within these four regimes, there is variation in important aspects of the second opinion process, and there is a general absence of direction given to the second opinion providers. Based on research showing the variability of second opinion provision under New Zealand mental health legislation, we argue that this absence is likely to result in significant variation in the quality and depth of second opinions provided in Australia. We argue that New South Wales, the Northern Territory, South Australia, and Tasmania should consider formal provision for patient-initiated second opinions in their mental health legislation. We believe that such legislation ought to be aware of the barriers patients may face in accessing second opinions, and avoid exacerbating these barriers as Queensland's legislation appears to. Also, we argue that research on current practice in Australia should be conducted to better understand the effects of legislation on second opinions, and to help determine what amounts to best practice.

我们审查了澳大利亚的精神健康立法,以确定精神科医生有哪些义务为提出申请的强制病人提供第二意见。只有四个辖区--澳大利亚首都地区、昆士兰州、维多利亚州和西澳大利亚州--对 "患者主动提出的 "第二意见进行了立法。在这四种制度中,第二意见程序的重要方面存在差异,而且普遍缺乏对第二意见提供者的指导。研究表明,新西兰精神卫生立法对第二意见提供的规定存在差异,基于此,我们认为,这种缺失很可能导致澳大利亚提供的第二意见在质量和深度上存在显著差异。我们认为,新南威尔士州、北部地区、南澳大利亚州和塔斯马尼亚州应考虑在其精神健康立法中正式规定由患者主动提出的第二意见。我们认为,此类立法应意识到患者在获取第二意见时可能面临的障碍,并避免像昆士兰州的立法那样加剧这些障碍。此外,我们还认为应该对澳大利亚的现行做法进行研究,以更好地了解立法对第二意见的影响,并帮助确定什么是最佳做法。
{"title":"Do compulsory mental health patients have a right to receive a second opinion on their treatment under Australian mental health legislation?","authors":"Sam Boyle, Emma Cockburn, Bianca Mandeville","doi":"10.1177/00048674241267219","DOIUrl":"10.1177/00048674241267219","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>We reviewed Australian mental health legislation to determine what obligations it places on psychiatrists to facilitate second opinions for compulsory patients who request them. Only four jurisdictions-Australian Capital Territory, Queensland, Victoria, and Western Australia-have legislated for 'patient-initiated' second opinions. Within these four regimes, there is variation in important aspects of the second opinion process, and there is a general absence of direction given to the second opinion providers. Based on research showing the variability of second opinion provision under New Zealand mental health legislation, we argue that this absence is likely to result in significant variation in the quality and depth of second opinions provided in Australia. We argue that New South Wales, the Northern Territory, South Australia, and Tasmania should consider formal provision for patient-initiated second opinions in their mental health legislation. We believe that such legislation ought to be aware of the barriers patients may face in accessing second opinions, and avoid exacerbating these barriers as Queensland's legislation appears to. Also, we argue that research on current practice in Australia should be conducted to better understand the effects of legislation on second opinions, and to help determine what amounts to best practice.</p>","PeriodicalId":8589,"journal":{"name":"Australian and New Zealand Journal of Psychiatry","volume":" ","pages":"927-929"},"PeriodicalIF":4.0,"publicationDate":"2024-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11497731/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141878294","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Letter to the Editor: Letter to the Editor regarding 'A revisionist model for treatment-resistant and difficult-to-treat depression'. 致编辑的信:致编辑的信,关于 "治疗耐药和难治抑郁症的修正主义模式"。
IF 4 2区 医学 Q1 PSYCHIATRY Pub Date : 2024-11-01 Epub Date: 2024-09-03 DOI: 10.1177/00048674241271020
Dusan Kolar, Michael V Kolar
{"title":"Letter to the Editor: Letter to the Editor regarding 'A revisionist model for treatment-resistant and difficult-to-treat depression'.","authors":"Dusan Kolar, Michael V Kolar","doi":"10.1177/00048674241271020","DOIUrl":"10.1177/00048674241271020","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":8589,"journal":{"name":"Australian and New Zealand Journal of Psychiatry","volume":" ","pages":"1008-1009"},"PeriodicalIF":4.0,"publicationDate":"2024-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142118886","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
期刊
Australian and New Zealand Journal of Psychiatry
全部 Acc. Chem. Res. ACS Applied Bio Materials ACS Appl. Electron. Mater. ACS Appl. Energy Mater. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces ACS Appl. Nano Mater. ACS Appl. Polym. Mater. ACS BIOMATER-SCI ENG ACS Catal. ACS Cent. Sci. ACS Chem. Biol. ACS Chemical Health & Safety ACS Chem. Neurosci. ACS Comb. Sci. ACS Earth Space Chem. ACS Energy Lett. ACS Infect. Dis. ACS Macro Lett. ACS Mater. Lett. ACS Med. Chem. Lett. ACS Nano ACS Omega ACS Photonics ACS Sens. ACS Sustainable Chem. Eng. ACS Synth. Biol. Anal. Chem. BIOCHEMISTRY-US Bioconjugate Chem. BIOMACROMOLECULES Chem. Res. Toxicol. Chem. Rev. Chem. Mater. CRYST GROWTH DES ENERG FUEL Environ. Sci. Technol. Environ. Sci. Technol. Lett. Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. IND ENG CHEM RES Inorg. Chem. J. Agric. Food. Chem. J. Chem. Eng. Data J. Chem. Educ. J. Chem. Inf. Model. J. Chem. Theory Comput. J. Med. Chem. J. Nat. Prod. J PROTEOME RES J. Am. Chem. Soc. LANGMUIR MACROMOLECULES Mol. Pharmaceutics Nano Lett. Org. Lett. ORG PROCESS RES DEV ORGANOMETALLICS J. Org. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. A J. Phys. Chem. B J. Phys. Chem. C J. Phys. Chem. Lett. Analyst Anal. Methods Biomater. Sci. Catal. Sci. Technol. Chem. Commun. Chem. Soc. Rev. CHEM EDUC RES PRACT CRYSTENGCOMM Dalton Trans. Energy Environ. Sci. ENVIRON SCI-NANO ENVIRON SCI-PROC IMP ENVIRON SCI-WAT RES Faraday Discuss. Food Funct. Green Chem. Inorg. Chem. Front. Integr. Biol. J. Anal. At. Spectrom. J. Mater. Chem. A J. Mater. Chem. B J. Mater. Chem. C Lab Chip Mater. Chem. Front. Mater. Horiz. MEDCHEMCOMM Metallomics Mol. Biosyst. Mol. Syst. Des. Eng. Nanoscale Nanoscale Horiz. Nat. Prod. Rep. New J. Chem. Org. Biomol. Chem. Org. Chem. Front. PHOTOCH PHOTOBIO SCI PCCP Polym. Chem.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1