J. Jang, Ji-Min Roh, O. Choo, You-Jeong Kim, Hantai Kim, H. Park, Y. Choung
Objectives: This study evaluated the influence of the performance of the first cochlear implant (CI-1) on the second implant (CI-2) and the significance of inter-implant intervals in children with sequential cochlear implantation. Method: Thirty-four patients were included for speech perception outcome and 38 patients were included for subjective hearing satisfaction in daily life in this study. The patients were classified into 3 groups according to inter-implant interval: group I, <4 years; group II, 4–7 years; group III, >7 years. Open-set speech perception scores before and at 3, 6, 12, and 24 months after the second implantation was compared among the CI-1, CI-2, and bilateral CI conditions. Subjective hearing benefits in daily life were measured using a questionnaire of Speech, Spatial, and Qualities of Hearing Scale (SSQ) for parents of children with impaired hearing, and device use and preference were evaluated (by phone interview.) Results: The speech perception of children using the CI-2 only improved quickly within 3 months postoperatively and were similar to those using the CI-1 only. The results of monosyllabic and disyllabic word tests using CI-2 at 3 months after second implantation were not significantly different from those in patients using the CI-1 only. In the sentence test, the scores using the CI-2 only were not significantly different from those using the first implant only at 6 months after second implantation. SSQ scores were similar among groups and the worst score in each section was shown from the questions about performance under noisy conditions in each section. Device usage habits showed that 17 (44.7%) and 16 (42.1%) patients preferred bilateral and the CI-1, respectively. Only 5 (13.2%) patients wanted the CI-2 rather than the CI-1. While group I and II showed a prominent positive attitude to bilateral use, group III, for which the inter-implant interval was 7 years or more, showed a definite preference for the CI-1 (p < 0.01). Conclusions: Functional binaural benefits were achieved in patients who were good performers with the CI-1 after the second implantation irrespective of the inter-implant interval. Sequential CI should be strongly recommended for patients with unilateral CI showing a good performance.
{"title":"Critical Factors for Binaural Hearing in Children with Bilateral Sequential Cochlear Implantation: First Implant Performance and Inter-Implant Interval","authors":"J. Jang, Ji-Min Roh, O. Choo, You-Jeong Kim, Hantai Kim, H. Park, Y. Choung","doi":"10.1159/000500700","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1159/000500700","url":null,"abstract":"Objectives: This study evaluated the influence of the performance of the first cochlear implant (CI-1) on the second implant (CI-2) and the significance of inter-implant intervals in children with sequential cochlear implantation. Method: Thirty-four patients were included for speech perception outcome and 38 patients were included for subjective hearing satisfaction in daily life in this study. The patients were classified into 3 groups according to inter-implant interval: group I, <4 years; group II, 4–7 years; group III, >7 years. Open-set speech perception scores before and at 3, 6, 12, and 24 months after the second implantation was compared among the CI-1, CI-2, and bilateral CI conditions. Subjective hearing benefits in daily life were measured using a questionnaire of Speech, Spatial, and Qualities of Hearing Scale (SSQ) for parents of children with impaired hearing, and device use and preference were evaluated (by phone interview.) Results: The speech perception of children using the CI-2 only improved quickly within 3 months postoperatively and were similar to those using the CI-1 only. The results of monosyllabic and disyllabic word tests using CI-2 at 3 months after second implantation were not significantly different from those in patients using the CI-1 only. In the sentence test, the scores using the CI-2 only were not significantly different from those using the first implant only at 6 months after second implantation. SSQ scores were similar among groups and the worst score in each section was shown from the questions about performance under noisy conditions in each section. Device usage habits showed that 17 (44.7%) and 16 (42.1%) patients preferred bilateral and the CI-1, respectively. Only 5 (13.2%) patients wanted the CI-2 rather than the CI-1. While group I and II showed a prominent positive attitude to bilateral use, group III, for which the inter-implant interval was 7 years or more, showed a definite preference for the CI-1 (p < 0.01). Conclusions: Functional binaural benefits were achieved in patients who were good performers with the CI-1 after the second implantation irrespective of the inter-implant interval. Sequential CI should be strongly recommended for patients with unilateral CI showing a good performance.","PeriodicalId":8624,"journal":{"name":"Audiology and Neurotology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2019-08-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"76574335","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
G. Conte, F. Lo Russo, L. Caschera, D. Zanetti, P. Castorina, C. Sina, F. Triulzi, F. Di Berardino
Objective: To describe clinical and imaging findings in a group of patients affected by nonsyndromic deafness A9 (DFNA9), using advanced magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) with 3-dimensional (3D) fluid-attenuated inversion recovery (FLAIR) sequence. Method: A retrospective case review was conducted in a tertiary referral center in Italy. Four sequential adult DFNA9-affected patients, who had undergone MRI at our Department between January 2017 and June 2018, were enrolled (male = 2, female = 2; median age: 65.6 years; 8 diseased ears analyzed). Three patients were relatives; the fourth was unrelated. The main outcome measures – age, sex, records of audiological and vestibular testing, genetic assessment, MRI findings – were analyzed. Results: All subjects suffered from bilateral progressive sensorineural hearing loss, more severely at the high frequencies and with a typical clinical pattern of bilateral chronic degenerative cochleovestibular deficit. Aural fullness was reported at the onset of the disease. All patients revealed a pathogenic heterozygous mutation in the Limulus factor C, Coch-5b2 and Lgl1 domain of cochlin. None of the patients showed a significant vestibular and cochlear endolymphatic hydrops at MRI, while high bilateral contrast enhancement on 4-h delayed postcontrast 3D FLAIR sequence was observed in all ears. Conclusions: Increased perilymph enhancement on 4-h delayed postcontrast 3D FLAIR sequence is the common imaging feature of DFNA9 ears, suggesting that blood-labyrinthine barrier breakdown may play the main role in the pathophysiology of this disease. Significant hydrops has been excluded by MRI. This finding might be clinically useful in differentiating DFNA9 disease from other pathologies with similar clinical findings like Ménière’s disease.
{"title":"Audiovestibular Phenotypes and Advanced Magnetic Resonance Imaging Features of Cochlin Gene Mutation Carriers","authors":"G. Conte, F. Lo Russo, L. Caschera, D. Zanetti, P. Castorina, C. Sina, F. Triulzi, F. Di Berardino","doi":"10.1159/000501292","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1159/000501292","url":null,"abstract":"Objective: To describe clinical and imaging findings in a group of patients affected by nonsyndromic deafness A9 (DFNA9), using advanced magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) with 3-dimensional (3D) fluid-attenuated inversion recovery (FLAIR) sequence. Method: A retrospective case review was conducted in a tertiary referral center in Italy. Four sequential adult DFNA9-affected patients, who had undergone MRI at our Department between January 2017 and June 2018, were enrolled (male = 2, female = 2; median age: 65.6 years; 8 diseased ears analyzed). Three patients were relatives; the fourth was unrelated. The main outcome measures – age, sex, records of audiological and vestibular testing, genetic assessment, MRI findings – were analyzed. Results: All subjects suffered from bilateral progressive sensorineural hearing loss, more severely at the high frequencies and with a typical clinical pattern of bilateral chronic degenerative cochleovestibular deficit. Aural fullness was reported at the onset of the disease. All patients revealed a pathogenic heterozygous mutation in the Limulus factor C, Coch-5b2 and Lgl1 domain of cochlin. None of the patients showed a significant vestibular and cochlear endolymphatic hydrops at MRI, while high bilateral contrast enhancement on 4-h delayed postcontrast 3D FLAIR sequence was observed in all ears. Conclusions: Increased perilymph enhancement on 4-h delayed postcontrast 3D FLAIR sequence is the common imaging feature of DFNA9 ears, suggesting that blood-labyrinthine barrier breakdown may play the main role in the pathophysiology of this disease. Significant hydrops has been excluded by MRI. This finding might be clinically useful in differentiating DFNA9 disease from other pathologies with similar clinical findings like Ménière’s disease.","PeriodicalId":8624,"journal":{"name":"Audiology and Neurotology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2019-08-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"78218245","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Front & Back Matter","authors":"J. Harris","doi":"10.1159/000502554","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1159/000502554","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":8624,"journal":{"name":"Audiology and Neurotology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2019-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"85564333","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Background: Recent evidence suggests that falls are a major complication of diabetes in elderly patients, leading to disability and preventable death. However, the potential risk factors leading to falls in patients with type 2 diabetes are not fully understood. This study was designed to explore the characteristics of vestibular dysfunction and balance control in patients with type 2 diabetes and to analyse the risk factors associated with falls. Methods: The study recruited 51 patients with type 2 diabetes and 43 controls who underwent vestibular function tests and balance control capability tests between January 2013 and December 2015. Vestibular function and balance control capability assessment was based on slow-phase velocity, canal paresis, Sensory Organisation Test (SOT) score, Limits of Stability Test (LOS) score, and Motor Control Test (MCT) score. Results: In all, 56.7% of the diabetic patients had vestibular dysfunction, compared with 27.9% of the controls (p = 0.005). Vestibular dysfunction was dependent on the duration of the disease and serum HbA1c levels. There were no significant differences between the two groups with respect to the balance test results for SOT score, somatosensory subtest score, vestibular subtest score, or LOS score. However, the visual system and MCT scores were significantly lower in the diabetic patients than in the controls (p = 0.032 and p = 0.018, respectively). Conclusions: Patients with type 2 diabetes have a higher incidence of vestibular dysfunction. Vestibular dysfunction, visual system impairment, and a decline in motion control may be the risk factors that can lead to falls, and thus need to be managed accordingly in diabetic patients.
{"title":"Impairment of Vestibular Function and Balance Control in Patients with Type 2 Diabetes","authors":"Jin Li, Jana Jiang, Yi Zhang, Bo Liu, Luo Zhang","doi":"10.1159/000501291","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1159/000501291","url":null,"abstract":"Background: Recent evidence suggests that falls are a major complication of diabetes in elderly patients, leading to disability and preventable death. However, the potential risk factors leading to falls in patients with type 2 diabetes are not fully understood. This study was designed to explore the characteristics of vestibular dysfunction and balance control in patients with type 2 diabetes and to analyse the risk factors associated with falls. Methods: The study recruited 51 patients with type 2 diabetes and 43 controls who underwent vestibular function tests and balance control capability tests between January 2013 and December 2015. Vestibular function and balance control capability assessment was based on slow-phase velocity, canal paresis, Sensory Organisation Test (SOT) score, Limits of Stability Test (LOS) score, and Motor Control Test (MCT) score. Results: In all, 56.7% of the diabetic patients had vestibular dysfunction, compared with 27.9% of the controls (p = 0.005). Vestibular dysfunction was dependent on the duration of the disease and serum HbA1c levels. There were no significant differences between the two groups with respect to the balance test results for SOT score, somatosensory subtest score, vestibular subtest score, or LOS score. However, the visual system and MCT scores were significantly lower in the diabetic patients than in the controls (p = 0.032 and p = 0.018, respectively). Conclusions: Patients with type 2 diabetes have a higher incidence of vestibular dysfunction. Vestibular dysfunction, visual system impairment, and a decline in motion control may be the risk factors that can lead to falls, and thus need to be managed accordingly in diabetic patients.","PeriodicalId":8624,"journal":{"name":"Audiology and Neurotology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2019-07-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"74505861","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Background: Several otologic conditions can present with fluctuating sensorineural hearing loss, including Ménière’s disease, autoimmune inner ear disease, and enlarged vestibular aqueduct. Although these 3 etiologies vary greatly, distinguishing between these conditions at initial presentation can be challenging. Furthermore, initial treatment of these conditions is often similar. In this review, we discuss historical and current perspectives on diagnosis and treatment of these conditions. Summary: A literature search was performed regarding fluctuating hearing loss, and current treatment of these etiologies of fluctuating hearing loss was summarized. Immediate measures at the onset of acute hearing loss include corticosteroid therapy, while preventative and chronic therapies, which can limit disease severity and frequency, vary based on the specific condition treated. Key Messages: Fluctuating hearing loss can represent a range of pathologies, but the precise etiology may not be clear at initial presentation. Timely treatment and long-term follow-up, along with appropriate diagnostics, are necessary to optimize long-term hearing.
{"title":"Fluctuating Sensorineural Hearing Loss","authors":"Hui Liu, Kunpeng Zhou, Xuemei Zhang, K. Peng","doi":"10.1159/000500658","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1159/000500658","url":null,"abstract":"Background: Several otologic conditions can present with fluctuating sensorineural hearing loss, including Ménière’s disease, autoimmune inner ear disease, and enlarged vestibular aqueduct. Although these 3 etiologies vary greatly, distinguishing between these conditions at initial presentation can be challenging. Furthermore, initial treatment of these conditions is often similar. In this review, we discuss historical and current perspectives on diagnosis and treatment of these conditions. Summary: A literature search was performed regarding fluctuating hearing loss, and current treatment of these etiologies of fluctuating hearing loss was summarized. Immediate measures at the onset of acute hearing loss include corticosteroid therapy, while preventative and chronic therapies, which can limit disease severity and frequency, vary based on the specific condition treated. Key Messages: Fluctuating hearing loss can represent a range of pathologies, but the precise etiology may not be clear at initial presentation. Timely treatment and long-term follow-up, along with appropriate diagnostics, are necessary to optimize long-term hearing.","PeriodicalId":8624,"journal":{"name":"Audiology and Neurotology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2019-07-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"86767342","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
B. Cinar, E. Tahir, Merve Ozbal Batuk, M. Yaralı, G. Sennaroğlu, L. Sennaroğlu
Background: Cochlear nerve deficiency is a general term used to describe both cochlear nerve hypoplasia (CNH) and cochlear nerve aplasia. Although these two conditions can have similar results on audiological evaluation, CNH yields more variation in audiological tests. Objectives: To describe the audiological characteristics of the CNH cases in our series in relation to radiological findings. Methods: We reviewed the medical charts, audiological findings, and radiological findings on cases with CNH. We included cases with CNH in one ear or both ears. Out of 90 subjects with CNH, we included a total of 40 individuals (21 women and 19 men; 49 ears) in the current study. We reviewed and analyzed the participants’ audiological test results according to the radiological findings. Results: Cases with CNH showed variations according to the cochlear structure. There were 13 normal cochleae, 4 with incomplete partition type I, and 32 with cochlear hypoplasia. The accompanying cochlear apertures also showed variation: 17 were normal, 28 stenotic, and 4 aplastic cochlear apertures. The subjects displayed hearing loss ranging from moderate to profound; furthermore, 4 subjects had no response to sound whatsoever. The degree of hearing loss was not statistically significantly different with regard to the presence or absence of cochlear malformation with CNH (p > 0.005). We observed both sensorineural hearing loss and mixed-type hearing loss among the CNH cases. Conclusions: CNH is the presence of a cochlear nerve that is smaller in diameter than the facial nerve. It can be accompanied with other associated inner ear malformations of different degrees of severity. We observed degrees of hearing loss ranging from moderate to profound.
{"title":"Cochlear Nerve Hypoplasia: Audiological Characteristics in Children and Adults","authors":"B. Cinar, E. Tahir, Merve Ozbal Batuk, M. Yaralı, G. Sennaroğlu, L. Sennaroğlu","doi":"10.1159/000500938","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1159/000500938","url":null,"abstract":"Background: Cochlear nerve deficiency is a general term used to describe both cochlear nerve hypoplasia (CNH) and cochlear nerve aplasia. Although these two conditions can have similar results on audiological evaluation, CNH yields more variation in audiological tests. Objectives: To describe the audiological characteristics of the CNH cases in our series in relation to radiological findings. Methods: We reviewed the medical charts, audiological findings, and radiological findings on cases with CNH. We included cases with CNH in one ear or both ears. Out of 90 subjects with CNH, we included a total of 40 individuals (21 women and 19 men; 49 ears) in the current study. We reviewed and analyzed the participants’ audiological test results according to the radiological findings. Results: Cases with CNH showed variations according to the cochlear structure. There were 13 normal cochleae, 4 with incomplete partition type I, and 32 with cochlear hypoplasia. The accompanying cochlear apertures also showed variation: 17 were normal, 28 stenotic, and 4 aplastic cochlear apertures. The subjects displayed hearing loss ranging from moderate to profound; furthermore, 4 subjects had no response to sound whatsoever. The degree of hearing loss was not statistically significantly different with regard to the presence or absence of cochlear malformation with CNH (p > 0.005). We observed both sensorineural hearing loss and mixed-type hearing loss among the CNH cases. Conclusions: CNH is the presence of a cochlear nerve that is smaller in diameter than the facial nerve. It can be accompanied with other associated inner ear malformations of different degrees of severity. We observed degrees of hearing loss ranging from moderate to profound.","PeriodicalId":8624,"journal":{"name":"Audiology and Neurotology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2019-07-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"82171137","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Front & Back Matter","authors":"A. Arora, L. Cascarini, J. Jeannon","doi":"10.1159/000502217","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1159/000502217","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":8624,"journal":{"name":"Audiology and Neurotology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2019-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"88627112","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Front & Back Matter","authors":"J. Harris","doi":"10.1159/000501054","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1159/000501054","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":8624,"journal":{"name":"Audiology and Neurotology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2019-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"90282068","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Front & Back Matter","authors":"","doi":"10.1159/000499615","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1159/000499615","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":8624,"journal":{"name":"Audiology and Neurotology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2019-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"85176556","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
D. Cotanche, R. Häusler, G. Housley, P. Jastreboff, M. Kenna, P. Lefebvre, L. Luxon, G. Manley, J. Melcher
Maurizio Barbara – University La Sapienza, Rome, Italy Olivier Bertrand – Centre Hospitalier Le Vinatier, Bron, France Thomas Brandt – Ludwig Maximilians University, Munich, Germany Barbara Canlon – Karolinska Institute, Stockholm, Sweden Douglas A. Cotanche – Harvard School of Public Health, Boston, USA Cor W.R.J. Cremers – University Medical Center St. Radboud, Nijmegen, The Netherlands Norbert Dillier – University Hospital, Zurich, Switzerland Robert Dobie – University of Texas Health Science Center, San Antonio, USA Manuel Don – House Ear Institute, Los Angeles, USA Jill B. Firszt – Washington University, St. Louis, USA Andrew Forge – University College London, London, United Kingdom Bernard Fraysse – Hôpital Purpan, Toulouse, France Rick Friedman – House Ear Institute, Los Angeles, USA Bruce J. Gantz – University of Iowa Hospitals and Clinics, Iowa City, USA Anthony W. Gummer – University of Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany James W. Hall, III. – University of Florida, Gainesville, USA Joseph W. Hall – University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, USA Michael Halmagyi – Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, Camperdown, Australia The Science of Hearing and Balance
Maurizio Barbara -意大利罗马拉萨皮恩扎大学Olivier Bertrand -法国布朗勒维纳蒂埃医院中心Thomas Brandt -德国慕尼黑路德维希马克西米利安大学Barbara Canlon -瑞典斯德哥尔摩卡罗林斯卡研究所Douglas A. Cotanche -美国波士顿哈佛大学公共卫生学院Cor W.R.J. Cremers -荷兰奈梅亨圣拉德梅亨大学医学中心Norbert Dillier -苏黎世大学医院瑞士Robert Dobie -美国圣安东尼奥德克萨斯大学健康科学中心Manuel Don - House耳研究所，美国洛杉矶Jill B. Firszt -美国圣路易斯华盛顿大学Andrew Forge -伦敦大学学院，英国伦敦Bernard Fraysse - Hôpital Purpan，法国图卢兹Rick Friedman - House耳研究所，美国洛杉矶Bruce J. Gantz -爱荷华大学医院和诊所，美国爱荷华市Anthony W. Gummer - t宾根大学，詹姆斯·w·霍尔，III。-美国盖恩斯维尔佛罗里达大学Joseph W. Hall -美国教堂山北卡罗来纳大学Michael Halmagyi -澳大利亚坎珀当皇家阿尔弗雷德王子医院听力与平衡科学
{"title":"Contents Vol. 23, 2018","authors":"D. Cotanche, R. Häusler, G. Housley, P. Jastreboff, M. Kenna, P. Lefebvre, L. Luxon, G. Manley, J. Melcher","doi":"10.1159/000497736","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1159/000497736","url":null,"abstract":"Maurizio Barbara – University La Sapienza, Rome, Italy Olivier Bertrand – Centre Hospitalier Le Vinatier, Bron, France Thomas Brandt – Ludwig Maximilians University, Munich, Germany Barbara Canlon – Karolinska Institute, Stockholm, Sweden Douglas A. Cotanche – Harvard School of Public Health, Boston, USA Cor W.R.J. Cremers – University Medical Center St. Radboud, Nijmegen, The Netherlands Norbert Dillier – University Hospital, Zurich, Switzerland Robert Dobie – University of Texas Health Science Center, San Antonio, USA Manuel Don – House Ear Institute, Los Angeles, USA Jill B. Firszt – Washington University, St. Louis, USA Andrew Forge – University College London, London, United Kingdom Bernard Fraysse – Hôpital Purpan, Toulouse, France Rick Friedman – House Ear Institute, Los Angeles, USA Bruce J. Gantz – University of Iowa Hospitals and Clinics, Iowa City, USA Anthony W. Gummer – University of Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany James W. Hall, III. – University of Florida, Gainesville, USA Joseph W. Hall – University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, USA Michael Halmagyi – Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, Camperdown, Australia The Science of Hearing and Balance","PeriodicalId":8624,"journal":{"name":"Audiology and Neurotology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2019-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"88448202","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
京公网安备 11010802042870号
京ICP备2023020795号-1
扫码关注我们
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：