L Awawdeh, R Forrest, C Turni, R Cobbold, J Henning, J Gibson
A healthy chicken's intestinal flora harbours a rich reservoir of Escherichia coli as part of the commensal microbiota. However, some strains, known as avian pathogenic E. coli (APEC), carry specific virulence genes (VGs) that enable them to invade and cause extraintestinal infections such as avian colibacillosis. Although several VG combinations have been identified, the pathogenic mechanisms associated with APEC are ill-defined. The current study screened a subset of 88 E. coli isolates selected from 237 pre-existing isolates obtained from commercial poultry flocks in Australia. The 88 isolates were selected based on their enterobacterial repetitive intergenic consensus (ERIC) and antimicrobial resistance (AMR) profiles and included 29 E. coli isolates cultured from chickens with colibacillosis (referred to as clinical E. coli or CEC) and 59 faecal E. coli (FEC) isolates cultured from clinically healthy chickens. The isolates were screened for the presence of 35 previously reported VGs. Of these, 34 were identified, with iucA not being detected. VGs focG, hlyA and sfa/foc were only detected in FEC isolates. Eight VGs had a prevalence of 90% or above in the CEC isolates. Specifically, astA (100%); feoB (96.6%); iutA, iss, ompT, iroN and hlyF (all 93.1%); and vat (89.7%). The prevalence of these were significantly lower in FEC isolates (astA 79.7%, feoB 77.9%, iutA 52.5%, iss 45.8%, ompT 50.9%, iroN 37.3%, hlyF 50.9% and vat 42.4%). The odds ratios that each of these eight VGs were more likely to be associated with CEC than FEC ranged from 7.8 to 21.9. These eight VGs may be used to better define APEC and diagnostically detect APEC in Australia. Further investigations are needed to identify the roles of these VGs in pathogenicity.
{"title":"Virulence-associated genes in faecal and clinical Escherichia coli isolates cultured from broiler chickens in Australia","authors":"L Awawdeh, R Forrest, C Turni, R Cobbold, J Henning, J Gibson","doi":"10.1111/avj.13339","DOIUrl":"10.1111/avj.13339","url":null,"abstract":"<p>A healthy chicken's intestinal flora harbours a rich reservoir of <i>Escherichia coli</i> as part of the commensal microbiota. However, some strains, known as avian pathogenic <i>E. coli</i> (APEC), carry specific virulence genes (VGs) that enable them to invade and cause extraintestinal infections such as avian colibacillosis. Although several VG combinations have been identified, the pathogenic mechanisms associated with APEC are ill-defined. The current study screened a subset of 88 <i>E. coli</i> isolates selected from 237 pre-existing isolates obtained from commercial poultry flocks in Australia. The 88 isolates were selected based on their enterobacterial repetitive intergenic consensus (ERIC) and antimicrobial resistance (AMR) profiles and included 29 <i>E. coli</i> isolates cultured from chickens with colibacillosis (referred to as clinical <i>E. coli</i> or CEC) and 59 faecal <i>E. coli</i> (FEC) isolates cultured from clinically healthy chickens. The isolates were screened for the presence of 35 previously reported VGs. Of these, 34 were identified, with <i>iucA</i> not being detected. VGs <i>focG</i>, <i>hlyA</i> and <i>sfa/foc</i> were only detected in FEC isolates. Eight VGs had a prevalence of 90% or above in the CEC isolates. Specifically, <i>astA</i> (100%); <i>feoB</i> (96.6%); <i>iutA</i>, <i>iss</i>, <i>ompT</i>, <i>iroN</i> and <i>hlyF</i> (all 93.1%); and <i>vat</i> (89.7%). The prevalence of these were significantly lower in FEC isolates (<i>astA</i> 79.7%, <i>feoB</i> 77.9%, <i>iutA</i> 52.5%, <i>iss</i> 45.8%, <i>ompT</i> 50.9%, <i>iroN</i> 37.3%, <i>hlyF</i> 50.9% and <i>vat</i> 42.4%). The odds ratios that each of these eight VGs were more likely to be associated with CEC than FEC ranged from 7.8 to 21.9. These eight VGs may be used to better define APEC and diagnostically detect APEC in Australia. Further investigations are needed to identify the roles of these VGs in pathogenicity.</p>","PeriodicalId":8661,"journal":{"name":"Australian Veterinary Journal","volume":"102 8","pages":"398-406"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3,"publicationDate":"2024-05-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/avj.13339","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"140897226","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}