Morgan, J. W., L. Gilfedder, K. L. McDougall, R. J.-P. Davies, M. A. Robertson, and R. Rehwinkel. 2025. “Why Conservation of Australian Native Temperate Grasslands Needs to Occur at Different Scales—From Landscapes to Patches, and From Governments to Individuals.” Austral Ecology 50, no. 10: e70131. https://doi.org/10.1111/aec.70131.
The FIGURE 3 caption ‘An example of a State and Transition Model developed for the Northern Plains grasslands of Victoria subjected to land use by livestock grazing, pasture improvement, and/or cropping. Note the seven vegetation states (the boxes) represent vegetation changes from ‘reference’ native grasslands (at the time of European colonisation, State 1)—ecosystems that were characterised by low soil nutrient status and low soil disturbance and maintained by light marsupial grazing and/or fire—all the way through to exotic ecosystems (dominated by cereal crops) where soil nutrients and soil disturbance are high; it is these inputs that maintain a non-native state at the expense of native species. The transitions (connecting arrows) represent the purported mechanism for grassland change, and whether those changes are thought to be reversible (i.e., an earlier vegetation state can be achieved with changes in disturbance, soil nutrients and ecological processes). Similar trajectories occur in other native grassland regions with land use, (e.g., see Sinclair et al. 2019) for a state and transition approach to vegetation change on the Victorian Volcanic Plains’ omitted an important reference to a similar, published State and Transition Model.
The new caption for FIGURE 3 should read ‘An example of a State and Transition Model developed for the Northern Plains grasslands of Victoria subjected to land use by livestock grazing, pasture improvement and/or cropping. Adapted from McIntyre and Lavorel (2007, Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment 119, 11–21). Note the seven vegetation states (the boxes) represent vegetation changes from ‘reference’ native grasslands (at the time of European colonisation, State 1)—ecosystems that were characterised by low soil nutrient status and low soil disturbance and maintained by light marsupial grazing and/or fire—all the way through to exotic ecosystems (dominated by cereal crops) where soil nutrients and soil disturbance are high; it is these inputs that maintain a non-native state at the expense of native species. The transitions (connecting arrows) represent the purported mechanism for grassland change, and whether those changes are thought to be reversible (i.e., an earlier vegetation state can be achieved with changes in disturbance, soil nutrients and ecological processes). Similar trajectories occur in other native grassland regions with land use, (e.g., see Sinclair et al. 2019) for a state and transition approach to vegetation change on the Victorian Volcanic Plains’.
We apologize for this oversight.