Pub Date : 2022-12-01DOI: 10.1637/aviandiseases-D-22-99998
Vagner R Lunge, Silvia De Carli, André S K Fonseca, Nilo Ikuta
Avian reovirus (ARV) is highly disseminated in commercial Brazilian poultry farms, causing arthritis/tenosynovitis, runting-stunting syndrome, and malabsorption syndrome in different meat- and egg-type birds (breeders, broilers, grillers, and layers). In Brazil, ARV infection was first described in broilers in the 1970s but was not considered an important poultry health problem for decades. A more concerning outcome of field infections has been observed in recent years, including condemnations at slaughterhouses because of the unsightly appearance of chicken body parts, mainly the legs. Analyses of the performance of poultry flocks have further evidenced economic losses to farms. Genetic and antigenic characterization of ARV field strains from Brazil demonstrated a high diversity of lineages circulating in the entire country, including four of the five main phylogenetic groups previously described (I, II, III, and V). It is still unclear if all of them are associated with different diseases affecting flocks' performance in Brazilian poultry. ARV infections have been controlled in Brazilian poultry farms by immunization of breeders and young chicks with classical commercial live vaccine strains (S1133, 1733, 2408, and 2177) used elsewhere in the Western Hemisphere. However, genetic and antigenic variations of the field isolates have prevented adequate protection against associated diseases, so killed autogenous vaccines are being produced from isolates obtained on specific farms. In conclusion, ARV field variants are continuously challenging poultry farming in Brazil. Epidemiological surveillance combined with molecular biological analyses from the field samples, as well as the development of vaccine strains directed toward the ARV circulating variants, are necessary to control this economically important poultry pathogen.
{"title":"Avian Reoviruses in Poultry Farms from Brazil.","authors":"Vagner R Lunge, Silvia De Carli, André S K Fonseca, Nilo Ikuta","doi":"10.1637/aviandiseases-D-22-99998","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1637/aviandiseases-D-22-99998","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Avian reovirus (ARV) is highly disseminated in commercial Brazilian poultry farms, causing arthritis/tenosynovitis, runting-stunting syndrome, and malabsorption syndrome in different meat- and egg-type birds (breeders, broilers, grillers, and layers). In Brazil, ARV infection was first described in broilers in the 1970s but was not considered an important poultry health problem for decades. A more concerning outcome of field infections has been observed in recent years, including condemnations at slaughterhouses because of the unsightly appearance of chicken body parts, mainly the legs. Analyses of the performance of poultry flocks have further evidenced economic losses to farms. Genetic and antigenic characterization of ARV field strains from Brazil demonstrated a high diversity of lineages circulating in the entire country, including four of the five main phylogenetic groups previously described (I, II, III, and V). It is still unclear if all of them are associated with different diseases affecting flocks' performance in Brazilian poultry. ARV infections have been controlled in Brazilian poultry farms by immunization of breeders and young chicks with classical commercial live vaccine strains (S1133, 1733, 2408, and 2177) used elsewhere in the Western Hemisphere. However, genetic and antigenic variations of the field isolates have prevented adequate protection against associated diseases, so killed autogenous vaccines are being produced from isolates obtained on specific farms. In conclusion, ARV field variants are continuously challenging poultry farming in Brazil. Epidemiological surveillance combined with molecular biological analyses from the field samples, as well as the development of vaccine strains directed toward the ARV circulating variants, are necessary to control this economically important poultry pathogen.</p>","PeriodicalId":8667,"journal":{"name":"Avian Diseases","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.4,"publicationDate":"2022-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"9296724","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2022-12-01DOI: 10.1637/0005-2086-66.4.371
Y M Saif
{"title":"Letter to the Editor.","authors":"Y M Saif","doi":"10.1637/0005-2086-66.4.371","DOIUrl":"10.1637/0005-2086-66.4.371","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":8667,"journal":{"name":"Avian Diseases","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.4,"publicationDate":"2022-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"10586473","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2022-12-01DOI: 10.1637/aviandiseases-D-22-99996
Dana Goldenberg
Avian reovirus (ARV) has been determined to be the etiologic agent of viral arthritis/tenosynovitis. In Israel, meat-type chickens, including broilers and breeders, are the most affected. Severe disease symptoms can appear in broiler flocks at a very young age because of early exposure and vertical transmission, causing significant welfare problems. Jewish laws define birds with inflamed, damaged, or torn gastrocnemius and digital flexor tendons as religious condemnations (non-kosher), resulting in severe economic losses for the poultry industry. Vaccination of breeders is a strategy to control the disease by reducing vertical transmission and providing maternal-derived antibodies to the progeny. This review describes Israel's ARV variants and the various vaccines developed over the years. Identification of co-circulating variants triggered the development of multivalent autogenous inactivated vaccines. However, the genotype-matched vaccines failed to provide protection, resulting in an increased prevalence of Cluster II ARV (classified as genotyping cluster 5 in the ARV common world classification). Since 2014, ARV Cluster II has been dominant in Israel. In 2015, the dominant variant s7585 tropism changed the virus pathogenesis and affected broilers with severe clinical signs between 12 and 15 days of age. A new vaccine approach developed in Israel used controlled exposure of the breeding flock to virulent ARV at the age when they are resistant to infection. This approach significantly reduced clinical field cases and reovirus isolations of breeding and broiler flocks between 2020 and 2022.
{"title":"Avian Reovirus in Israel, Variants and Vaccines-A Review.","authors":"Dana Goldenberg","doi":"10.1637/aviandiseases-D-22-99996","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1637/aviandiseases-D-22-99996","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Avian reovirus (ARV) has been determined to be the etiologic agent of viral arthritis/tenosynovitis. In Israel, meat-type chickens, including broilers and breeders, are the most affected. Severe disease symptoms can appear in broiler flocks at a very young age because of early exposure and vertical transmission, causing significant welfare problems. Jewish laws define birds with inflamed, damaged, or torn gastrocnemius and digital flexor tendons as religious condemnations (non-kosher), resulting in severe economic losses for the poultry industry. Vaccination of breeders is a strategy to control the disease by reducing vertical transmission and providing maternal-derived antibodies to the progeny. This review describes Israel's ARV variants and the various vaccines developed over the years. Identification of co-circulating variants triggered the development of multivalent autogenous inactivated vaccines. However, the genotype-matched vaccines failed to provide protection, resulting in an increased prevalence of Cluster II ARV (classified as genotyping cluster 5 in the ARV common world classification). Since 2014, ARV Cluster II has been dominant in Israel. In 2015, the dominant variant s7585 tropism changed the virus pathogenesis and affected broilers with severe clinical signs between 12 and 15 days of age. A new vaccine approach developed in Israel used controlled exposure of the breeding flock to virulent ARV at the age when they are resistant to infection. This approach significantly reduced clinical field cases and reovirus isolations of breeding and broiler flocks between 2020 and 2022.</p>","PeriodicalId":8667,"journal":{"name":"Avian Diseases","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.4,"publicationDate":"2022-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"10731691","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2022-12-01DOI: 10.1637/aviandiseases-D-22-00056
Maryam K Mohammadi-Aragh, John E Linhoss, Christopher A Marty, Jeffrey D Evans, Joseph L Purswell, Bernardo Chaves-Cordoba, G Daniel Chesser, J Wesley Lowe
Escherichia coli (E. coli) is a commensal bacteria found in the gastrointestinal tract of poultry; however, some strains are pathogenic and can cause a wide range of diseases. In addition, some strains of pathogenic E. coli can survive in the litter between flocks, making litter management critical for reducing E. coli-associated infections. Biochar (BC) is a porous, carbonaceous material that may be a beneficial litter amendment to reduce moisture and microbial loads. The objectives of this study were to evaluate the effects of pine BC, miscanthus BC, and Poultry Litter Treatment (PLT) on E. coli, total aerobic bacteria populations, and bacterial communities when added to used broiler litter. Pine and miscanthus BC were mixed into poultry litter at inclusion rates of 5%, 10%, 20%, 25%, and 30% w/w. PLT was surface applied at a rate of 0.73 kg/m2. Baseline E. coli and aerobics were measured after a 48-hr litter incubation period and just prior to adding litter treatments. Escherichia coli and aerobics were enumerated 2 and 7 days after adding treatments. Overall, pine BC at 30% had the lowest E. coli and aerobic counts (5.98 and 6.44 log 10 colony-forming units [CFU]/g, respectively); however, they were not significantly different from the control (P ≤ 0.05). At day 2, 30% pine BC inclusion rate treatment resulted in a significant reduction in E. coli and aerobic bacteria counts compared to the control. Miscanthus BC application did not result in significant reductions in E. coli or aerobic bacteria at days 2 or 7. PLT had the highest E. coli (7.07 log 10 CFU/g) and aerobic counts (7.21 log 10 CFU/g) overall. Bacterial community analysis revealed that the alpha and beta diversity between pine BC- and PLT-treated litter were significantly different. However, neither BC type significantly impacted bacterial diversity when compared to the control. Differences in E. coli and aerobic counts between BC types may be attributed to variations in feedstock physiochemical properties.
{"title":"Evaluating the Effects of Pine and Miscanthus Biochar on <i>Escherichia coli</i>, Total Aerobic Bacteria, and Bacterial Communities in Commercial Broiler Litter.","authors":"Maryam K Mohammadi-Aragh, John E Linhoss, Christopher A Marty, Jeffrey D Evans, Joseph L Purswell, Bernardo Chaves-Cordoba, G Daniel Chesser, J Wesley Lowe","doi":"10.1637/aviandiseases-D-22-00056","DOIUrl":"10.1637/aviandiseases-D-22-00056","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><i>Escherichia coli</i> (<i>E. coli</i>) is a commensal bacteria found in the gastrointestinal tract of poultry; however, some strains are pathogenic and can cause a wide range of diseases. In addition, some strains of pathogenic <i>E. coli</i> can survive in the litter between flocks, making litter management critical for reducing <i>E. coli</i>-associated infections. Biochar (BC) is a porous, carbonaceous material that may be a beneficial litter amendment to reduce moisture and microbial loads. The objectives of this study were to evaluate the effects of pine BC, miscanthus BC, and Poultry Litter Treatment (PLT) on <i>E. coli</i>, total aerobic bacteria populations, and bacterial communities when added to used broiler litter. Pine and miscanthus BC were mixed into poultry litter at inclusion rates of 5%, 10%, 20%, 25%, and 30% w/w. PLT was surface applied at a rate of 0.73 kg/m<sup>2</sup>. Baseline <i>E. coli</i> and aerobics were measured after a 48-hr litter incubation period and just prior to adding litter treatments. <i>Escherichia coli</i> and aerobics were enumerated 2 and 7 days after adding treatments. Overall, pine BC at 30% had the lowest <i>E. coli</i> and aerobic counts (5.98 and 6.44 log <sub>10</sub> colony-forming units [CFU]/g, respectively); however, they were not significantly different from the control (<i>P</i> ≤ 0.05). At day 2, 30% pine BC inclusion rate treatment resulted in a significant reduction in <i>E. coli</i> and aerobic bacteria counts compared to the control. Miscanthus BC application did not result in significant reductions in <i>E. coli</i> or aerobic bacteria at days 2 or 7. PLT had the highest <i>E. coli</i> (7.07 log <sub>10</sub> CFU/g) and aerobic counts (7.21 log <sub>10</sub> CFU/g) overall. Bacterial community analysis revealed that the alpha and beta diversity between pine BC- and PLT-treated litter were significantly different. However, neither BC type significantly impacted bacterial diversity when compared to the control. Differences in <i>E. coli</i> and aerobic counts between BC types may be attributed to variations in feedstock physiochemical properties.</p>","PeriodicalId":8667,"journal":{"name":"Avian Diseases","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.3,"publicationDate":"2022-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"10805894","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2022-12-01DOI: 10.1637/aviandiseases-D-22-99997
Victor Palomino-Tapia, Luke Nickel, Ben Schlegel, Darko Mitevski, Tom Inglis, Mohamed Faizal Abdul-Careem
Viral arthritis/tenosynovitis, a disease caused by avian reovirus (ARV), leads to great economic losses for the chicken industry worldwide. Since autumn 2011, the poultry industries in the United States and Canada have sustained significant economic losses in the progeny of broiler breeders vaccinated with classic strains of ARV. Vaccination failure has been caused by field challenge with variant ARVs. The variant field ARVs are refractory to the immunity stimulated by classic vaccines and have become the prevalent challenge in the field. Because all genotypes described in the literature have been reported to be circulating in Canada, genotyping of circulating ARVs is paramount for the selection of appropriate isolates, representative of the field challenge, for use in autogenous vaccines. In this review, the history of ARVs and the current situation in Canada are discussed. On the basis of recent field data, inadequate measures commonly used in the field are discussed, and successful vaccination strategies are recommended.
{"title":"Review of Viral Arthritis in Canada.","authors":"Victor Palomino-Tapia, Luke Nickel, Ben Schlegel, Darko Mitevski, Tom Inglis, Mohamed Faizal Abdul-Careem","doi":"10.1637/aviandiseases-D-22-99997","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1637/aviandiseases-D-22-99997","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Viral arthritis/tenosynovitis, a disease caused by avian reovirus (ARV), leads to great economic losses for the chicken industry worldwide. Since autumn 2011, the poultry industries in the United States and Canada have sustained significant economic losses in the progeny of broiler breeders vaccinated with classic strains of ARV. Vaccination failure has been caused by field challenge with variant ARVs. The variant field ARVs are refractory to the immunity stimulated by classic vaccines and have become the prevalent challenge in the field. Because all genotypes described in the literature have been reported to be circulating in Canada, genotyping of circulating ARVs is paramount for the selection of appropriate isolates, representative of the field challenge, for use in autogenous vaccines. In this review, the history of ARVs and the current situation in Canada are discussed. On the basis of recent field data, inadequate measures commonly used in the field are discussed, and successful vaccination strategies are recommended.</p>","PeriodicalId":8667,"journal":{"name":"Avian Diseases","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.4,"publicationDate":"2022-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"10731694","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2022-12-01DOI: 10.1637/aviandiseases-D-22-99994
Milos Markis
Avian reoviruses are ubiquitous in poultry production worldwide and can be transmitted vertically or horizontally among chickens. The pathogenicity of reoviruses can range from very pathogenic viruses that affect multiple tissues and organs to apathogenic. Avian reoviruses have been associated with many disease presentations, and two of the most economically significant diseases are viral arthritis/tenosynovitis and viral enteritis. Viral arthritis/tenosynovitis has been recognized since the 1950s and essentially disappeared after development of attenuated live and inactivated vaccines in the 1980s but re-emerged in 2011 due to the emergence of antigenic variants. Viral enteritis was first recognized in the 1970s and became the predominant reovirus-associated disease between 2006 and 2011 due to the emergence of pathogenic enterotropic reoviruses. Pathogenicity of reovirus isolates can be evaluated in several ways, including inoculation of day-old broiler chicks with low maternal reovirus antibody titers via the foot pad route or the oral and intratracheal route. Pathogenic reoviruses induce foot pad inflammation within 3 days of inoculation, and more pathogenic reoviruses are able to disseminate to and damage visceral organs. Only reovirus infections in young chickens result in disease due to age-related resistance to disease development. Reoviruses exist as many serotypes and subtypes with various degrees of interrelatedness. The earliest reovirus strains in the United States were antigenically related to each other and are referred to as S1133-like viruses, but in the 2000s, reoviruses emerged that were antigenically different from the S1133-like viruses. Virus neutralization assay using polyclonal antisera has been used to classify the emerging variant reoviruses into serogroups. The first reovirus vaccines were developed in the 1970s, and by the 1980s breeder vaccination programs were established that protected breeders, prevented vertical transmission of reovirus, and provided maternal immunity to the progeny during the crucial first 3 wk of life. With the emergence of antigenic variant reoviruses in the 2000s, vaccination programs using S1133-like vaccines became ineffective. The poultry industry has relied on vaccination with autogenous inactivated reovirus vaccines to alleviate losses due to viral arthritis/tenosynovitis and viral enteritis. Virus isolates used for autogenous vaccines must be updated regularly and are selected based on pathotype, serotype, or Sigma C (σC) genotype. Live attenuated S1133 vaccines are still used in breeder chickens for the priming effect, followed by one or more injections of the inactivated licensed and/or autogenous vaccines. The route of vaccination and the number of doses received by breeder chickens are very important for a sufficient antibody response. Intramuscular vaccination with inactivated vaccines elicits the highest antibody response, while subcutaneous vaccination with inactivated vacci
禽呼肠孤病毒在全世界家禽生产中普遍存在,可在鸡之间垂直或水平传播。呼肠孤病毒的致病性可以从影响多个组织和器官的高致病性病毒到致病性病毒不等。禽呼肠孤病毒与许多疾病有关,其中两种最具经济意义的疾病是病毒性关节炎/腱鞘炎和病毒性肠炎。病毒性关节炎/腱鞘炎自20世纪50年代以来一直得到确认,在20世纪80年代开发出减毒活疫苗和灭活疫苗后基本消失,但由于抗原变异的出现,2011年再次出现。病毒性肠炎在20世纪70年代首次得到确认,并在2006年至2011年期间由于致病性肠嗜肠性呼肠孤病毒的出现而成为主要的呼肠孤病毒相关疾病。呼肠孤病毒分离株的致病性可通过几种方法进行评估,包括通过足垫途径或口服和气管内途径接种母系呼肠孤病毒抗体滴度低的日龄肉鸡。致病性呼肠孤病毒在接种后3天内诱发足垫炎症,致病性更强的呼肠孤病毒能够传播并损害内脏器官。只有呼肠孤病毒感染雏鸡才会由于年龄相关的疾病发展抵抗力而导致疾病。呼肠孤病毒以多种血清型和亚型存在,具有不同程度的相互关联性。在美国,最早的呼肠孤病毒毒株在抗原性上彼此相关,被称为s1133样病毒,但在2000年代,呼肠孤病毒的出现与s1133样病毒的抗原性不同。使用多克隆抗血清的病毒中和试验已被用于将新出现的呼肠孤病毒分为血清群。第一批呼肠孤病毒疫苗是在20世纪70年代开发的,到20世纪80年代,建立了繁殖者疫苗接种计划,以保护繁殖者,防止呼肠孤病毒的垂直传播,并在关键的前3周为后代提供母体免疫。随着21世纪初抗原变异呼肠孤病毒的出现,使用s1133样疫苗的疫苗接种计划变得无效。家禽业依靠接种自身灭活呼肠孤病毒疫苗来减轻病毒性关节炎/腱鞘炎和病毒性肠炎造成的损失。用于自体疫苗的病毒分离株必须定期更新,并根据病原型、血清型或Sigma C (σC)基因型进行选择。S1133减毒活疫苗仍用于种鸡,以达到启动效果,然后注射一次或多次灭活许可疫苗和/或自体疫苗。种鸡接种疫苗的途径和接种的剂量对于产生足够的抗体反应非常重要。肌内接种灭活疫苗可引起最高的抗体应答,而皮下接种灭活疫苗可引起低抗体应答。最近,研究的重点是开发替代疫苗和疫苗接种战略。一种灭活的呼肠孤病毒变体疫苗已被开发出来,可引起对多种变体血清型的保护,实验性重组疫苗和亚单位疫苗已被描述并显示出潜力。需要进行更多的研究,以开发更好的疫苗、疫苗接种规划和其他控制措施,以预防呼肠孤病毒感染、传播和因疾病造成的损失。
{"title":"Evaluation of Pathogenicity and Antigenicity of Avian Reoviruses and Disease Control Through Vaccination.","authors":"Milos Markis","doi":"10.1637/aviandiseases-D-22-99994","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1637/aviandiseases-D-22-99994","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Avian reoviruses are ubiquitous in poultry production worldwide and can be transmitted vertically or horizontally among chickens. The pathogenicity of reoviruses can range from very pathogenic viruses that affect multiple tissues and organs to apathogenic. Avian reoviruses have been associated with many disease presentations, and two of the most economically significant diseases are viral arthritis/tenosynovitis and viral enteritis. Viral arthritis/tenosynovitis has been recognized since the 1950s and essentially disappeared after development of attenuated live and inactivated vaccines in the 1980s but re-emerged in 2011 due to the emergence of antigenic variants. Viral enteritis was first recognized in the 1970s and became the predominant reovirus-associated disease between 2006 and 2011 due to the emergence of pathogenic enterotropic reoviruses. Pathogenicity of reovirus isolates can be evaluated in several ways, including inoculation of day-old broiler chicks with low maternal reovirus antibody titers via the foot pad route or the oral and intratracheal route. Pathogenic reoviruses induce foot pad inflammation within 3 days of inoculation, and more pathogenic reoviruses are able to disseminate to and damage visceral organs. Only reovirus infections in young chickens result in disease due to age-related resistance to disease development. Reoviruses exist as many serotypes and subtypes with various degrees of interrelatedness. The earliest reovirus strains in the United States were antigenically related to each other and are referred to as S1133-like viruses, but in the 2000s, reoviruses emerged that were antigenically different from the S1133-like viruses. Virus neutralization assay using polyclonal antisera has been used to classify the emerging variant reoviruses into serogroups. The first reovirus vaccines were developed in the 1970s, and by the 1980s breeder vaccination programs were established that protected breeders, prevented vertical transmission of reovirus, and provided maternal immunity to the progeny during the crucial first 3 wk of life. With the emergence of antigenic variant reoviruses in the 2000s, vaccination programs using S1133-like vaccines became ineffective. The poultry industry has relied on vaccination with autogenous inactivated reovirus vaccines to alleviate losses due to viral arthritis/tenosynovitis and viral enteritis. Virus isolates used for autogenous vaccines must be updated regularly and are selected based on pathotype, serotype, or Sigma C (σC) genotype. Live attenuated S1133 vaccines are still used in breeder chickens for the priming effect, followed by one or more injections of the inactivated licensed and/or autogenous vaccines. The route of vaccination and the number of doses received by breeder chickens are very important for a sufficient antibody response. Intramuscular vaccination with inactivated vaccines elicits the highest antibody response, while subcutaneous vaccination with inactivated vacci","PeriodicalId":8667,"journal":{"name":"Avian Diseases","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.4,"publicationDate":"2022-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"10731696","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2022-10-27DOI: 10.1637/0005-2086-66.3.368
{"title":"Avian Pathology Volume 51 Number 3 June 2022 Table of Contents","authors":"","doi":"10.1637/0005-2086-66.3.368","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1637/0005-2086-66.3.368","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":8667,"journal":{"name":"Avian Diseases","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.4,"publicationDate":"2022-10-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"49552416","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2022-10-27DOI: 10.1637/0005-2086-66.3.369
S. Rautenschlein, Tessa J. Nash, L. Vervelde
{"title":"Avian Pathology Volume 51 Number 4 August 2022 Table of Contents","authors":"S. Rautenschlein, Tessa J. Nash, L. Vervelde","doi":"10.1637/0005-2086-66.3.369","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1637/0005-2086-66.3.369","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":8667,"journal":{"name":"Avian Diseases","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.4,"publicationDate":"2022-10-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"67547406","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2022-10-27DOI: 10.1637/0005-2086-66.3.c2
Carlene Burton, Sherri Eckroade Trossbach, K. Schat
Dr. Robert (Bob) Eckroade was born at the Walter Reed Army Hospital in Washington, D.C. on June 24, 1937 to Kermit and June Eckroade. Bob spent his school years in Cradock, VA, a small planned community near Portsmouth. In 1955, he matriculated at Virginia Tech. During this period, he married his high school sweetheart, Carlene Burton, which substantially increased his focus and success in his pre-veterinary medicine studies. After 3 years, Bob enrolled at the University of Georgia (1958-1962) to pursue his dream of becoming a small animal veterinarian. During this period, Don Davis introduced Bob to poultry science, which ultimately led to a career in poultry medicine after receiving his MS and PhD degrees in Pathology and Veterinary Science from the University of Wisconsin in 1971. Afterwards, he joined the University of Delaware working on infectious bursal disease with Walt Staples. In 1975, Bob joined the faculty of the University of Pennsylvania School of Veterinary Medicine where he remained until his retirement in 2003.
{"title":"Cover Advertisements","authors":"Carlene Burton, Sherri Eckroade Trossbach, K. Schat","doi":"10.1637/0005-2086-66.3.c2","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1637/0005-2086-66.3.c2","url":null,"abstract":"Dr. Robert (Bob) Eckroade was born at the Walter Reed Army Hospital in Washington, D.C. on June 24, 1937 to Kermit and June Eckroade. Bob spent his school years in Cradock, VA, a small planned community near Portsmouth. In 1955, he matriculated at Virginia Tech. During this period, he married his high school sweetheart, Carlene Burton, which substantially increased his focus and success in his pre-veterinary medicine studies. After 3 years, Bob enrolled at the University of Georgia (1958-1962) to pursue his dream of becoming a small animal veterinarian. During this period, Don Davis introduced Bob to poultry science, which ultimately led to a career in poultry medicine after receiving his MS and PhD degrees in Pathology and Veterinary Science from the University of Wisconsin in 1971. Afterwards, he joined the University of Delaware working on infectious bursal disease with Walt Staples. In 1975, Bob joined the faculty of the University of Pennsylvania School of Veterinary Medicine where he remained until his retirement in 2003.","PeriodicalId":8667,"journal":{"name":"Avian Diseases","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.4,"publicationDate":"2022-10-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"48823895","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2022-10-01DOI: 10.1637/aviandiseases-D-22-00020
D Petzoldt, N Vogel, W Bielenberg, J Haneke, H Bischoff, M Liman, S Rönchen, K-P Behr, T Menke
Since mid-2015, there has been an increasing number of chicken samples that are positive for infectious bronchitis virus (IBV) in a screening PCR but which do not show positive results in any established, variant-specific PCR tests (793B, QX, D1466, Massachusetts, D274, Italy 02, Arkansas, Variant 2, Q1). Partial sequencing of the viral genome of those samples shows great similarities, but nucleotide similarity in the S1 gene is only about 57%-61% when compared to any other known GI-GVII IBV genotype and lineage. With nucleotide identity in the S1 gene of approximately 80%, the closest related strain in the National Center for Biotechnology Information database (as of March 15, 2020) is the North American PA/1220/98 isolate (AY789942) designated as a unique variant by Valastro et al. in 2016. Due to its divergence from other IBV strains, we propose that strain, designated IB80, is the type strain of a novel IBV genotype GVIII. So far, IB80 has been detected in commercial layer and broiler parent flocks, frequently showing severe drops in egg production as well as in broiler flocks in Europe and beyond.
{"title":"IB80-A Novel Infectious Bronchitis Virus Genotype (GVIII).","authors":"D Petzoldt, N Vogel, W Bielenberg, J Haneke, H Bischoff, M Liman, S Rönchen, K-P Behr, T Menke","doi":"10.1637/aviandiseases-D-22-00020","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1637/aviandiseases-D-22-00020","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Since mid-2015, there has been an increasing number of chicken samples that are positive for infectious bronchitis virus (IBV) in a screening PCR but which do not show positive results in any established, variant-specific PCR tests (793B, QX, D1466, Massachusetts, D274, Italy 02, Arkansas, Variant 2, Q1). Partial sequencing of the viral genome of those samples shows great similarities, but nucleotide similarity in the S1 gene is only about 57%-61% when compared to any other known GI-GVII IBV genotype and lineage. With nucleotide identity in the S1 gene of approximately 80%, the closest related strain in the National Center for Biotechnology Information database (as of March 15, 2020) is the North American PA/1220/98 isolate (AY789942) designated as a unique variant by Valastro <i>et al</i>. in 2016. Due to its divergence from other IBV strains, we propose that strain, designated IB80, is the type strain of a novel IBV genotype GVIII. So far, IB80 has been detected in commercial layer and broiler parent flocks, frequently showing severe drops in egg production as well as in broiler flocks in Europe and beyond.</p>","PeriodicalId":8667,"journal":{"name":"Avian Diseases","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.4,"publicationDate":"2022-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"10326735","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}