Pub Date : 2026-02-01Epub Date: 2025-10-14DOI: 10.1177/13623613251380927
Jessica Tupou, Fran Kewene, Ia Morrison-Young, Ahi Wi-Hongi, Andrew Sporle, Tori Diamond, Reremoana Theodore, Nicholas Bowden
This study examines disparities in autism identification rates and support needs between Māori and non-Māori populations in Aotearoa New Zealand. The research was conducted through a collaborative approach with autistic Māori. Population-level administrative data were analysed for all individuals aged 0-24 years (N = 1,565,505) as of 30 June 2018. Autism identification was determined through health service records from July 2010 to June 2018. Comparative analyses examined autism rates, intellectual disability (ID) co-occurrence, and Ongoing Resourcing Scheme (ORS; high-need education funding support) allocation between Māori and non-Māori populations. Autism identification rates were lower among Māori (70.9/10,000) compared to non-Māori (78.3/10,000). Autistic Māori had higher rates of ID diagnosis (OR = 1.12; 95% CI = 1.02, 1.24) and ORS funding allocation (OR = 1.35; 95% CI = 1.22, 1.48). The observed disparities in autism identification rates and diagnostic patterns suggest potential systemic barriers to autism identification among Māori, particularly for those with lower formal support needs. Future Kaupapa Māori, autistic-led research is warranted to better understand these disparities and inform culturally responsive diagnostic and support services.Lay AbstractIn this study, autistic Māori collaborated with researchers to analyse autism identification in Aotearoa New Zealand using population-level administrative data. The research examined all children and young people (0-24 years) in the Aotearoa New Zealand population as of 30 June 2018, identifying autism through health service records between July 2010 and June 2018. The findings showed lower autism identification rates among Māori (70.9 per 10,000) compared to non-Māori (78.3 per 10,000). This difference in rates is likely to reflect ongoing inequities and systemic racism, not true prevalence differences. Autistic Māori were also more frequently diagnosed with intellectual disability (ID) and more likely to receive high-need education funding support than autistic non-Māori. While these patterns might suggest higher formal support needs among autistic Māori, it's crucial to recognise that support requirements are highly individual and context-dependent, making them difficult to measure using broad indicators. The lower overall autism identification rate among Māori, combined with these findings, suggests that autistic Māori with lower formal support needs may be missing opportunities for diagnosis and not accessing the supports and services they are entitled to. Future Kaupapa Māori, autistic-led research is needed to gain a more nuanced understanding of autism identification and support needs among Māori.
{"title":"Identification of autistic Māori in Aotearoa New Zealand: A national cross-sectional study.","authors":"Jessica Tupou, Fran Kewene, Ia Morrison-Young, Ahi Wi-Hongi, Andrew Sporle, Tori Diamond, Reremoana Theodore, Nicholas Bowden","doi":"10.1177/13623613251380927","DOIUrl":"10.1177/13623613251380927","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This study examines disparities in autism identification rates and support needs between Māori and non-Māori populations in Aotearoa New Zealand. The research was conducted through a collaborative approach with autistic Māori. Population-level administrative data were analysed for all individuals aged 0-24 years (<i>N</i> = 1,565,505) as of 30 June 2018. Autism identification was determined through health service records from July 2010 to June 2018. Comparative analyses examined autism rates, intellectual disability (ID) co-occurrence, and Ongoing Resourcing Scheme (ORS; high-need education funding support) allocation between Māori and non-Māori populations. Autism identification rates were lower among Māori (70.9/10,000) compared to non-Māori (78.3/10,000). Autistic Māori had higher rates of ID diagnosis (OR = 1.12; 95% CI = 1.02, 1.24) and ORS funding allocation (OR = 1.35; 95% CI = 1.22, 1.48). The observed disparities in autism identification rates and diagnostic patterns suggest potential systemic barriers to autism identification among Māori, particularly for those with lower formal support needs. Future Kaupapa Māori, autistic-led research is warranted to better understand these disparities and inform culturally responsive diagnostic and support services.Lay AbstractIn this study, autistic Māori collaborated with researchers to analyse autism identification in Aotearoa New Zealand using population-level administrative data. The research examined all children and young people (0-24 years) in the Aotearoa New Zealand population as of 30 June 2018, identifying autism through health service records between July 2010 and June 2018. The findings showed lower autism identification rates among Māori (70.9 per 10,000) compared to non-Māori (78.3 per 10,000). This difference in rates is likely to reflect ongoing inequities and systemic racism, not true prevalence differences. Autistic Māori were also more frequently diagnosed with intellectual disability (ID) and more likely to receive high-need education funding support than autistic non-Māori. While these patterns might suggest higher formal support needs among autistic Māori, it's crucial to recognise that support requirements are highly individual and context-dependent, making them difficult to measure using broad indicators. The lower overall autism identification rate among Māori, combined with these findings, suggests that autistic Māori with lower formal support needs may be missing opportunities for diagnosis and not accessing the supports and services they are entitled to. Future Kaupapa Māori, autistic-led research is needed to gain a more nuanced understanding of autism identification and support needs among Māori.</p>","PeriodicalId":8724,"journal":{"name":"Autism","volume":"30 2","pages":"362-374"},"PeriodicalIF":5.6,"publicationDate":"2026-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12804406/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146040191","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2026-02-01Epub Date: 2025-09-16DOI: 10.1177/13623613251374971
Monica Hm Verkooijen, Marjolijn Ketelaar, Max van Woerden, Wouter G Staal, Indira Tendolkar, Janneke R Zinkstok
<p><p>The neurodiversity approach recognizes autism as a natural variation of human experience, emphasizing unique strengths while acknowledging social and behavioral challenges that may affect quality of life. Peer support, based on shared experiences and mutual understanding, has shown benefits in mental health care, yet its impact for autistic individuals remains underexplored. This review is of peer-support programs for individuals with autism, focusing on impact, facilitators, and barriers. A systematic literature review was conducted using Cochrane Library, Web of Science, PubMed, Embase, PsycINFO, and Sociological Abstracts. Studies involving peer-support programs for autistic individuals aged 12 and older were selected. Fifteen articles described 12 unique peer-support programs with varying goals, such as enhancing personal development. Studies reported diverse improvements, including enhanced well-being, self-esteem, and academic performance. Many participants valued connecting with peers in an autism-focused context. Most articles discussed some facilitators and barriers. Peer support shows promising benefits for autistic individuals, fostering empowerment and well-being. However, the methodological limitations of the included studies, such as small sample sizes and lack of control groups, limit the strength of these conclusions. Future research should therefore use more robust research methods and investigate accessibility and potential risks to optimize peer support for this population.Lay Abstract<b>Connecting through peer support: Understanding the impact of peer-support programs on individuals with autism and exploring barriers and facilitators.</b><b>Aim and Purpose of the Research:</b> This study aims to explore the impact of peer-support programs for autistic individuals. Peer support is defined as a supportive relationship between people with shared lived experiences. This review examines the impact of these programs on autistic individuals and identifies key challenges and facilitators that may influence outcomes.<b>Background:</b> Autism, characterized by differences in social interaction and behavior, can affect many aspects of daily life, including social and academic functioning, which can lead to a reduced quality of life. While peer support has proven beneficial in general healthcare, its potential for autistic individuals remains underexplored. Peer-support programs may offer mutual understanding and emotional support, making them a promising approach to improving well-being for people with autism.<b>Methods:</b> A systematic review was conducted using multiple databases to identify research articles published up to January 17, 2024. Studies included focused on peer-support programs for autistic individuals aged 12 and older, employing methods such as interviews or questionnaires to assess their impact.<b>Results and Importance:</b> The findings indicate that peer-support programs generally have a positive impact, inclu
神经多样性方法将自闭症视为人类经验的自然变异,强调其独特的优势,同时承认可能影响生活质量的社会和行为挑战。基于共享经验和相互理解的同伴支持在精神卫生保健方面已显示出益处,但其对自闭症患者的影响仍未得到充分探讨。这篇综述是针对自闭症患者的同伴支持项目,重点关注影响、促进因素和障碍。使用Cochrane Library、Web of Science、PubMed、Embase、PsycINFO和Sociological Abstracts进行系统文献综述。研究选择了针对12岁及以上自闭症患者的同伴支持项目。15篇文章描述了12个独特的同伴支持项目,这些项目有不同的目标,比如促进个人发展。研究报告了各种各样的改善,包括增强幸福感、自尊和学习成绩。许多参与者都重视在以自闭症为中心的环境中与同龄人交流。大多数文章都讨论了一些促进因素和障碍。同伴支持对自闭症患者有很大的好处,可以增强他们的能力和幸福感。然而,纳入研究的方法学局限性,如样本量小和缺乏对照组,限制了这些结论的强度。因此,未来的研究应该使用更有力的研究方法,调查可及性和潜在风险,以优化对这一人群的同伴支持。摘要通过同伴支持进行联系:了解同伴支持项目对自闭症个体的影响,并探索障碍和促进因素。研究目的:本研究旨在探讨同伴支持计划对自闭症个体的影响。同伴支持被定义为有共同生活经历的人之间的支持关系。本综述考察了这些项目对自闭症个体的影响,并确定了可能影响结果的关键挑战和促进因素。背景:自闭症以社会互动和行为的差异为特征,可以影响日常生活的许多方面,包括社会和学术功能,这可能导致生活质量下降。虽然同伴支持在一般医疗保健中已被证明是有益的,但它对自闭症患者的潜力仍未得到充分探索。同伴支持项目可以提供相互理解和情感支持,使它们成为改善自闭症患者福祉的有希望的方法。方法:对截至2024年1月17日发表的研究论文进行系统评价。研究包括针对12岁及以上自闭症患者的同伴支持项目,采用访谈或问卷调查等方法来评估其影响。结果和重要性:研究结果表明,同伴支持项目通常有积极的影响,包括提高自尊、学习成绩和整体幸福感。参与者很重视与有类似经历的人交流的机会。虽然研究结果很有希望,但大多数研究规模小,质量低,因此需要更多的研究。未来的研究还应该调查影响同伴支持成功的因素,并探索为自闭症患者优化这些项目的方法。
{"title":"Impact of peer-support programs for individuals with autism: A systematic review.","authors":"Monica Hm Verkooijen, Marjolijn Ketelaar, Max van Woerden, Wouter G Staal, Indira Tendolkar, Janneke R Zinkstok","doi":"10.1177/13623613251374971","DOIUrl":"10.1177/13623613251374971","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The neurodiversity approach recognizes autism as a natural variation of human experience, emphasizing unique strengths while acknowledging social and behavioral challenges that may affect quality of life. Peer support, based on shared experiences and mutual understanding, has shown benefits in mental health care, yet its impact for autistic individuals remains underexplored. This review is of peer-support programs for individuals with autism, focusing on impact, facilitators, and barriers. A systematic literature review was conducted using Cochrane Library, Web of Science, PubMed, Embase, PsycINFO, and Sociological Abstracts. Studies involving peer-support programs for autistic individuals aged 12 and older were selected. Fifteen articles described 12 unique peer-support programs with varying goals, such as enhancing personal development. Studies reported diverse improvements, including enhanced well-being, self-esteem, and academic performance. Many participants valued connecting with peers in an autism-focused context. Most articles discussed some facilitators and barriers. Peer support shows promising benefits for autistic individuals, fostering empowerment and well-being. However, the methodological limitations of the included studies, such as small sample sizes and lack of control groups, limit the strength of these conclusions. Future research should therefore use more robust research methods and investigate accessibility and potential risks to optimize peer support for this population.Lay Abstract<b>Connecting through peer support: Understanding the impact of peer-support programs on individuals with autism and exploring barriers and facilitators.</b><b>Aim and Purpose of the Research:</b> This study aims to explore the impact of peer-support programs for autistic individuals. Peer support is defined as a supportive relationship between people with shared lived experiences. This review examines the impact of these programs on autistic individuals and identifies key challenges and facilitators that may influence outcomes.<b>Background:</b> Autism, characterized by differences in social interaction and behavior, can affect many aspects of daily life, including social and academic functioning, which can lead to a reduced quality of life. While peer support has proven beneficial in general healthcare, its potential for autistic individuals remains underexplored. Peer-support programs may offer mutual understanding and emotional support, making them a promising approach to improving well-being for people with autism.<b>Methods:</b> A systematic review was conducted using multiple databases to identify research articles published up to January 17, 2024. Studies included focused on peer-support programs for autistic individuals aged 12 and older, employing methods such as interviews or questionnaires to assess their impact.<b>Results and Importance:</b> The findings indicate that peer-support programs generally have a positive impact, inclu","PeriodicalId":8724,"journal":{"name":"Autism","volume":" ","pages":"300-315"},"PeriodicalIF":5.6,"publicationDate":"2026-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12804424/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145074209","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2026-02-01Epub Date: 2025-09-25DOI: 10.1177/13623613251370818
Kamil R Hiralal, Gwendolyn C Dieleman, Britt R Kok, Luka D Diederen, Rana P Duman, Manon Hj Hillegers, Sabine E Mous
Autism is heterogenic in core and co-occurring characteristics. Subtyping autism in a longitudinal manner aids the understanding of autism development throughout life and thus enhances personalized support. In this systematic review, we summarized the literature on latent core autism characteristics trajectories and trajectories of other functional domains in autistic individuals and identified predictors of trajectory assignment. We searched Embase, Medline, PsycINFO, Cochrane Central, Web of Science, and Google Scholar until April 22, 2025. We included longitudinal observational studies that applied statistical subtyping methods on core autism characteristics or other functional domains in autistic individuals. A total of 30 eligible analyses were included. The included analyses investigated core autism characteristics (10), adaptive behavior (10), behavioral problems (7), adverse childhood experiences (1), cognitive development (1), and feeding problems (1). For each domain, we found differing numbers and shapes of trajectories. Cognitive development was predictive of core autism symptom trajectory classifications, where cognitive development was generally lower in more severely affected core autism symptom trajectories. We found mixed results for other predictors. Future studies should focus on understudied outcome domains, such as motor coordination or sleep problems. In addition, more research is needed to understand when and why individuals deviate from their subgroup trajectory.Lay abstractAutistic people can have very different characteristics. Investigating groups based on their characteristics over time can improve our understanding of how autistic people develop and why development can differ between people. We reviewed studies that group autistic individuals based on their development of autistic features and other characteristics. We included 30 analyses and summarized their findings. The studies show that there are different ways autistic individuals develop based on core autistic characteristics (social difficulties and focused, intense and repetitive behaviors, interests and activities), as well as for adaptive behavior, behavioral problems, cognitive development, and feeding problems. For core characteristics, lower cognitive abilities seemed to be related to less favorable developmental pathways. This review showed that autistic people may show distinct patterns of development in core characteristics and other domains. We also highlight that some domains of functioning, such as motor coordination and sleeping problems, are not studied in the literature and future studies should focus on these domains as well since these are difficulties that autistic people often face. Identifying distinct developmental patterns in autistic children can help to predict the outcome of autistic people and may aid in offering personalized support.
自闭症在核心和共同发生的特征上是异质的。对自闭症进行纵向分型有助于了解自闭症在整个生命过程中的发展,从而增强个性化支持。本文综述了自闭症个体潜在核心自闭症特征轨迹和其他功能域轨迹的相关文献,并确定了轨迹分配的预测因子。我们检索了Embase、Medline、PsycINFO、Cochrane Central、Web of Science和b谷歌Scholar,直到2025年4月22日。我们纳入了纵向观察研究,应用统计分型方法对自闭症个体的核心自闭症特征或其他功能领域进行研究。共纳入30项符合条件的分析。纳入的分析包括核心自闭症特征(10)、适应行为(10)、行为问题(7)、不良童年经历(1)、认知发展(1)和喂养问题(1)。对于每个域,我们发现了不同数量和形状的轨迹。认知发展对核心自闭症症状轨迹分类具有预测作用,在受影响更严重的核心自闭症症状轨迹中,认知发展通常较低。我们发现其他预测因素的结果好坏参半。未来的研究应该集中在未被充分研究的结果领域,如运动协调或睡眠问题。此外,还需要更多的研究来了解个体何时以及为什么会偏离他们的子群体轨迹。自闭症患者可能有非常不同的特征。随着时间的推移,根据他们的特征对群体进行调查,可以提高我们对自闭症患者如何发展以及为什么人与人之间的发展会有所不同的理解。我们回顾了根据自闭症特征和其他特征的发展对自闭症个体进行分组的研究。我们纳入了30项分析并总结了他们的发现。研究表明,基于自闭症的核心特征(社交困难和集中、激烈和重复的行为、兴趣和活动),以及适应行为、行为问题、认知发展和喂养问题,自闭症个体有不同的发展方式。就核心特征而言,较低的认知能力似乎与较不利的发展途径有关。这一综述表明,自闭症患者在核心特征和其他领域可能表现出明显的发展模式。我们还强调,一些功能领域,如运动协调和睡眠问题,在文献中没有研究过,未来的研究也应该关注这些领域,因为这些是自闭症患者经常面临的困难。识别自闭症儿童独特的发展模式可以帮助预测自闭症患者的结果,并可能有助于提供个性化的支持。
{"title":"Latent trajectories in autistic individuals: A systematic review.","authors":"Kamil R Hiralal, Gwendolyn C Dieleman, Britt R Kok, Luka D Diederen, Rana P Duman, Manon Hj Hillegers, Sabine E Mous","doi":"10.1177/13623613251370818","DOIUrl":"10.1177/13623613251370818","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Autism is heterogenic in core and co-occurring characteristics. Subtyping autism in a longitudinal manner aids the understanding of autism development throughout life and thus enhances personalized support. In this systematic review, we summarized the literature on latent core autism characteristics trajectories and trajectories of other functional domains in autistic individuals and identified predictors of trajectory assignment. We searched Embase, Medline, PsycINFO, Cochrane Central, Web of Science, and Google Scholar until April 22, 2025. We included longitudinal observational studies that applied statistical subtyping methods on core autism characteristics or other functional domains in autistic individuals. A total of 30 eligible analyses were included. The included analyses investigated core autism characteristics (10), adaptive behavior (10), behavioral problems (7), adverse childhood experiences (1), cognitive development (1), and feeding problems (1). For each domain, we found differing numbers and shapes of trajectories. Cognitive development was predictive of core autism symptom trajectory classifications, where cognitive development was generally lower in more severely affected core autism symptom trajectories. We found mixed results for other predictors. Future studies should focus on understudied outcome domains, such as motor coordination or sleep problems. In addition, more research is needed to understand when and why individuals deviate from their subgroup trajectory.Lay abstractAutistic people can have very different characteristics. Investigating groups based on their characteristics over time can improve our understanding of how autistic people develop and why development can differ between people. We reviewed studies that group autistic individuals based on their development of autistic features and other characteristics. We included 30 analyses and summarized their findings. The studies show that there are different ways autistic individuals develop based on core autistic characteristics (social difficulties and focused, intense and repetitive behaviors, interests and activities), as well as for adaptive behavior, behavioral problems, cognitive development, and feeding problems. For core characteristics, lower cognitive abilities seemed to be related to less favorable developmental pathways. This review showed that autistic people may show distinct patterns of development in core characteristics and other domains. We also highlight that some domains of functioning, such as motor coordination and sleeping problems, are not studied in the literature and future studies should focus on these domains as well since these are difficulties that autistic people often face. Identifying distinct developmental patterns in autistic children can help to predict the outcome of autistic people and may aid in offering personalized support.</p>","PeriodicalId":8724,"journal":{"name":"Autism","volume":" ","pages":"285-299"},"PeriodicalIF":5.6,"publicationDate":"2026-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12804397/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145136222","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2026-02-01Epub Date: 2025-11-14DOI: 10.1177/13623613251391492
Elena Sofia Silva, Linda Drijvers, James P Trujillo
<p><p>Autistic individuals often show differential sensory perception, including hypo- or hypersensitivities to sound. Previous research also suggests that autistic individuals often have difficulty processing intentional and affective cues in speech acoustics. However, general speech processing difficulties remain underexplored. We investigated self-reported auditory perception using the Speech, Spatial, and Qualities of Hearing Questionnaire among autistic (self-identifying (<i>n</i> = 18) and clinically diagnosed (<i>n</i> = 45)) and non-autistic adults (<i>N</i> = 66). The study was conducted in the Netherlands, but the questionnaire and call for participation were in English and open to anyone regardless of country of residence. Both clinically diagnosed and self-identifying individuals with autism reported significantly lower scores on the Speech, Spatial, and Qualities of Hearing Questionnaire score and on the Speech subscale compared with non-autistic individuals, indicating challenges in overall quality of auditory perception, speech comprehension. Clinically diagnosed individuals also showed lower scores on the quality and spatial subscales compared with non-autistic individuals. Post hoc analysis further suggested that speech hearing is particularly challenging for many autistic individuals. In addition, our finding that self-identifying and clinically diagnosed autistic individuals show similar patterns of hearing difficulties emphasizes the need for more inclusive research practices that collect the experiences of all the individuals in the autistic community in the study of sensory perception in autism.Lay abstractAutistic individuals often have very different sensory experiences compared with non-autistic individuals. One anecdotally mentioned, but not well-researched phenomenon is difficulty processing what we are hearing. Rather than challenges related to language understanding, such as nonliteral or indirect language, autistic people may also have more difficulty making sense of the sounds of their environment. This may be hearing where particular sounds are coming from, or understanding what is being said, particularly in noisy situations. To bring more attention and clarity to this challenge, we asked autistic and non-autistic adults to fill out a short survey that measures one's hearing experiences in daily life. We found that autistic individuals report more difficulty across several types of hearing, and most prominently regarding speech hearing, when compared with non-autistic individuals. This finding highlights that reports of auditory processing difficulties when there is no hearing loss are not niche experiences, but rather reflect a common experience in autistic adults. In addition, we found that clinically diagnosed and self-identifying individuals reported very similar experiences. This highlights the validity of self-identification/self-diagnosis for research aimed at understanding autistic experiences. This study,
{"title":"Exploring auditory perception experiences in daily situations in autistic adults.","authors":"Elena Sofia Silva, Linda Drijvers, James P Trujillo","doi":"10.1177/13623613251391492","DOIUrl":"10.1177/13623613251391492","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Autistic individuals often show differential sensory perception, including hypo- or hypersensitivities to sound. Previous research also suggests that autistic individuals often have difficulty processing intentional and affective cues in speech acoustics. However, general speech processing difficulties remain underexplored. We investigated self-reported auditory perception using the Speech, Spatial, and Qualities of Hearing Questionnaire among autistic (self-identifying (<i>n</i> = 18) and clinically diagnosed (<i>n</i> = 45)) and non-autistic adults (<i>N</i> = 66). The study was conducted in the Netherlands, but the questionnaire and call for participation were in English and open to anyone regardless of country of residence. Both clinically diagnosed and self-identifying individuals with autism reported significantly lower scores on the Speech, Spatial, and Qualities of Hearing Questionnaire score and on the Speech subscale compared with non-autistic individuals, indicating challenges in overall quality of auditory perception, speech comprehension. Clinically diagnosed individuals also showed lower scores on the quality and spatial subscales compared with non-autistic individuals. Post hoc analysis further suggested that speech hearing is particularly challenging for many autistic individuals. In addition, our finding that self-identifying and clinically diagnosed autistic individuals show similar patterns of hearing difficulties emphasizes the need for more inclusive research practices that collect the experiences of all the individuals in the autistic community in the study of sensory perception in autism.Lay abstractAutistic individuals often have very different sensory experiences compared with non-autistic individuals. One anecdotally mentioned, but not well-researched phenomenon is difficulty processing what we are hearing. Rather than challenges related to language understanding, such as nonliteral or indirect language, autistic people may also have more difficulty making sense of the sounds of their environment. This may be hearing where particular sounds are coming from, or understanding what is being said, particularly in noisy situations. To bring more attention and clarity to this challenge, we asked autistic and non-autistic adults to fill out a short survey that measures one's hearing experiences in daily life. We found that autistic individuals report more difficulty across several types of hearing, and most prominently regarding speech hearing, when compared with non-autistic individuals. This finding highlights that reports of auditory processing difficulties when there is no hearing loss are not niche experiences, but rather reflect a common experience in autistic adults. In addition, we found that clinically diagnosed and self-identifying individuals reported very similar experiences. This highlights the validity of self-identification/self-diagnosis for research aimed at understanding autistic experiences. This study,","PeriodicalId":8724,"journal":{"name":"Autism","volume":" ","pages":"439-451"},"PeriodicalIF":5.6,"publicationDate":"2026-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12804400/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145523007","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2026-02-01Epub Date: 2025-10-30DOI: 10.1177/13623613251384436
Maria Downey, Juwayriyah Nayyar, Suzanne Guerin, Cliodhna O'Connor
With growing numbers of adults seeking and receiving autism diagnoses, understanding subjective experiences of this process is crucial for sensitive policy and practice. The route to diagnosis can be long and circuitous, yet most evidence on adults' experiences of diagnosis relies on retrospective reports collected at a single point in time. The current study explores lived experiences of the diagnostic journey through serial qualitative interviews conducted in the weeks before and after adults' autism diagnosis. Fourteen adults participated in online interviews over videoconferencing or email. Thematic analysis of the data suggested the diagnostic process could be characterised according to three themes. Journey to Self-Discovery identified the pursuit of diagnosis as rooted in a drive for self-understanding, propelled by anticipated benefits that were partially realised, and emotionally complex at all stages. Challenges with Navigating the Diagnostic Process highlighted how the process of acquiring and adjusting to a diagnosis was shaped by issues of resource access, system deficiencies, social inequalities and cognitive overwhelm. Isolation to Advocacy revealed how journeys that began in independent self-initiative evolved over time into community participation and advocacy. Providing original evidence of how lived experiences of adult autism diagnosis evolve across time, the current study offers valuable context for adults pursuing assessment, professionals performing assessments and policy-makers designing adult autism services.Lay abstractIncreasing numbers of people are receiving autism diagnoses in adulthood. Understanding their firsthand experience of diagnosis is crucial for improving supports for adults undergoing autism assessment. This study conducted interviews with adults at two time-points: one interview during the six weeks before their assessment, and a second interview within six weeks after their assessment. Fourteen people volunteered to participate in the study through videocall or email. The interview transcripts were analysed using a process called thematic analysis, with specialist software used to find patterns across people's experiences. The analysis suggested that adults appreciated the role of diagnosis in helping develop a better understanding of themselves. Nevertheless, people had mixed emotions both leading up to the assessment and after their autism diagnosis. Adults experienced many challenges in arranging and undergoing the autism assessment. However, the process of getting a diagnosis helped many to move from feeling isolated to feeling part of a wider community. These findings will be useful to adults at different stages of the diagnosis process, and for professionals and policy-makers developing adult autism services.
{"title":"When expectation meets experience: A qualitative analysis of serial interviews with adults before and after autism assessment.","authors":"Maria Downey, Juwayriyah Nayyar, Suzanne Guerin, Cliodhna O'Connor","doi":"10.1177/13623613251384436","DOIUrl":"10.1177/13623613251384436","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>With growing numbers of adults seeking and receiving autism diagnoses, understanding subjective experiences of this process is crucial for sensitive policy and practice. The route to diagnosis can be long and circuitous, yet most evidence on adults' experiences of diagnosis relies on retrospective reports collected at a single point in time. The current study explores lived experiences of the diagnostic journey through serial qualitative interviews conducted in the weeks before and after adults' autism diagnosis. Fourteen adults participated in online interviews over videoconferencing or email. Thematic analysis of the data suggested the diagnostic process could be characterised according to three themes. <i>Journey to Self-Discovery</i> identified the pursuit of diagnosis as rooted in a drive for self-understanding, propelled by anticipated benefits that were partially realised, and emotionally complex at all stages. <i>Challenges with Navigating the Diagnostic Process</i> highlighted how the process of acquiring and adjusting to a diagnosis was shaped by issues of resource access, system deficiencies, social inequalities and cognitive overwhelm. <i>Isolation to Advocacy</i> revealed how journeys that began in independent self-initiative evolved over time into community participation and advocacy. Providing original evidence of how lived experiences of adult autism diagnosis evolve across time, the current study offers valuable context for adults pursuing assessment, professionals performing assessments and policy-makers designing adult autism services.Lay abstractIncreasing numbers of people are receiving autism diagnoses in adulthood. Understanding their firsthand experience of diagnosis is crucial for improving supports for adults undergoing autism assessment. This study conducted interviews with adults at two time-points: one interview during the six weeks before their assessment, and a second interview within six weeks after their assessment. Fourteen people volunteered to participate in the study through videocall or email. The interview transcripts were analysed using a process called thematic analysis, with specialist software used to find patterns across people's experiences. The analysis suggested that adults appreciated the role of diagnosis in helping develop a better understanding of themselves. Nevertheless, people had mixed emotions both leading up to the assessment and after their autism diagnosis. Adults experienced many challenges in arranging and undergoing the autism assessment. However, the process of getting a diagnosis helped many to move from feeling isolated to feeling part of a wider community. These findings will be useful to adults at different stages of the diagnosis process, and for professionals and policy-makers developing adult autism services.</p>","PeriodicalId":8724,"journal":{"name":"Autism","volume":" ","pages":"402-411"},"PeriodicalIF":5.6,"publicationDate":"2026-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12804394/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145407940","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2026-02-01Epub Date: 2025-12-17DOI: 10.1177/13623613251395538
Nell Maltman, Camille J Wynn, Elizabeth A Wynn, Audra Sterling
Linguistic alignment reflects shared linguistic behaviors (e.g. syntax and lexicon) between interlocutors. Recent work has examined whether autistic children align to the same degree as their non-autistic peers, with current findings inconclusive. This study took an in-depth approach to investigating factors contributing to variation in linguistic alignment among autistic individuals. Eighteen school-age and adolescent autistic male participants, 14 males with fragile X syndrome + autism, and their mothers participated in the study. Dyads engaged in an unstructured conversation for ~12 min. Using Bayesian linear mixed-effect models, we assessed the relationships between alignment and within-individual factors of the participants. Lexical and syntactic alignment were uniquely influenced by within-participant factors. Maternal lexical and syntactic alignment were differentially associated with participant cognitive and expressive language abilities, and according to etiology (fragile X syndrome + autism vs idiopathic autism). This study highlights the complexity of alignment in autistic individuals and their mothers. Results suggest that alignment is a dynamic process that is motivated in part by within-individual traits of their children. Consequently, characterizing alignment in autism requires a highly nuanced and thoughtful approach that accounts for the heterogeneity of the population.
{"title":"The impact of individual factors on linguistic alignment of autistic boys and their mothers.","authors":"Nell Maltman, Camille J Wynn, Elizabeth A Wynn, Audra Sterling","doi":"10.1177/13623613251395538","DOIUrl":"10.1177/13623613251395538","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Linguistic alignment reflects shared linguistic behaviors (e.g. syntax and lexicon) between interlocutors. Recent work has examined whether autistic children align to the same degree as their non-autistic peers, with current findings inconclusive. This study took an in-depth approach to investigating factors contributing to variation in linguistic alignment among autistic individuals. Eighteen school-age and adolescent autistic male participants, 14 males with fragile X syndrome + autism, and their mothers participated in the study. Dyads engaged in an unstructured conversation for ~12 min. Using Bayesian linear mixed-effect models, we assessed the relationships between alignment and within-individual factors of the participants. Lexical and syntactic alignment were uniquely influenced by within-participant factors. Maternal lexical and syntactic alignment were differentially associated with participant cognitive and expressive language abilities, and according to etiology (fragile X syndrome + autism vs idiopathic autism). This study highlights the complexity of alignment in autistic individuals and their mothers. Results suggest that alignment is a dynamic process that is motivated in part by within-individual traits of their children. Consequently, characterizing alignment in autism requires a highly nuanced and thoughtful approach that accounts for the heterogeneity of the population.</p>","PeriodicalId":8724,"journal":{"name":"Autism","volume":" ","pages":"510-524"},"PeriodicalIF":5.6,"publicationDate":"2026-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145766978","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2026-02-01Epub Date: 2025-10-28DOI: 10.1177/13623613251383343
Donald Maciver, Anusua Singh Roy, Lorna Johnston, Marie Boilson, Eleanor Curnow, Victoria Johnstone-Cooke, Marion Rutherford
This study examined differences in referral and diagnosis based on sex recorded at birth (hereafter, 'sex'), using case notes from 408 individuals diagnosed by 30 multidisciplinary teams across Scotland. Analyses focused on male-to-female ratios and median ages at referral and diagnosis across attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder, autism and intellectual disability. The lifespan male-to-female ratio across all diagnoses was 1.31, varying by category and age. In autism, the male-to-female ratio was 2.21 for children under 10 years, but there were more females in adolescence (male-to-female ratio = 0.79) and adulthood (male-to-female ratio = 0.94). Across the lifespan, combining all diagnoses, females were referred later (median ages: 14.4 vs 19.7 years; p < 0.001) and diagnosed later (median ages: 15.2 vs 20.2 years; p < 0.001), indicating a 5-year delay. Among autistic children and adolescents, females were referred later (median age: 7.5 vs 10.5 years; p = 0.002) and diagnosed later (median age: 9.3 vs 11.9 years; p = 0.003). However, no significant differences were found in age of referral or diagnosis for autistic adults. Overall, the results indicate increasing balance in sex ratios with age, greater asymmetry in younger age groups, and consistent delays in referral and diagnosis ages for females.Lay abstractThis article looks at how males and females are diagnosed with neurodevelopmental differences including autism, attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) and intellectual disabilities. It studies the case notes of 408 people (adults and children) assessed by 30 different teams during their diagnosis process. The results show overall that more males were diagnosed with neurodevelopmental differences and that males are diagnosed at younger ages compared to females. The increased diagnosis of males compared to females is most common in younger ages, but and as people get older, the number of males and females diagnosed becomes more equal, showing that more women are coming forward for and being diagnosed, for example with autism and ADHD. This research shows that although there are increasing amounts of females diagnosed, that girls and women are still missed when they are young, with more boys gaining a diagnosis as children. It seems there is a pattern of females being diagnosed at later ages (meaning less access to support and self-understanding). The study calls for better diagnostic practices and more research to address these gender differences.
这项研究根据苏格兰30个多学科团队诊断的408名患者的病例记录,调查了基于出生时性别记录(以下简称“性别”)的转诊和诊断差异。分析的重点是男女比例和转诊和诊断时的中位年龄,包括注意缺陷/多动障碍、自闭症和智力残疾。所有诊断的寿命男女比为1.31,因类别和年龄而异。在自闭症中,10岁以下儿童的男女比例为2.21,但青春期(男女比例为0.79)和成年期(男女比例为0.94)的女性比例更多。在整个生命周期中,结合所有诊断,女性转诊较晚(中位年龄:14.4 vs 19.7岁;p
{"title":"Are we getting better at identifying and diagnosing neurodivergent girls and women? Insights into sex ratios and age of diagnosis from clinical population data in Scotland.","authors":"Donald Maciver, Anusua Singh Roy, Lorna Johnston, Marie Boilson, Eleanor Curnow, Victoria Johnstone-Cooke, Marion Rutherford","doi":"10.1177/13623613251383343","DOIUrl":"10.1177/13623613251383343","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This study examined differences in referral and diagnosis based on sex recorded at birth (hereafter, 'sex'), using case notes from 408 individuals diagnosed by 30 multidisciplinary teams across Scotland. Analyses focused on male-to-female ratios and median ages at referral and diagnosis across attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder, autism and intellectual disability. The lifespan male-to-female ratio across all diagnoses was 1.31, varying by category and age. In autism, the male-to-female ratio was 2.21 for children under 10 years, but there were more females in adolescence (male-to-female ratio = 0.79) and adulthood (male-to-female ratio = 0.94). Across the lifespan, combining all diagnoses, females were referred later (median ages: 14.4 vs 19.7 years; p < 0.001) and diagnosed later (median ages: 15.2 vs 20.2 years; p < 0.001), indicating a 5-year delay. Among autistic children and adolescents, females were referred later (median age: 7.5 vs 10.5 years; p = 0.002) and diagnosed later (median age: 9.3 vs 11.9 years; p = 0.003). However, no significant differences were found in age of referral or diagnosis for autistic adults. Overall, the results indicate increasing balance in sex ratios with age, greater asymmetry in younger age groups, and consistent delays in referral and diagnosis ages for females.Lay abstractThis article looks at how males and females are diagnosed with neurodevelopmental differences including autism, attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) and intellectual disabilities. It studies the case notes of 408 people (adults and children) assessed by 30 different teams during their diagnosis process. The results show overall that more males were diagnosed with neurodevelopmental differences and that males are diagnosed at younger ages compared to females. The increased diagnosis of males compared to females is most common in younger ages, but and as people get older, the number of males and females diagnosed becomes more equal, showing that more women are coming forward for and being diagnosed, for example with autism and ADHD. This research shows that although there are increasing amounts of females diagnosed, that girls and women are still missed when they are young, with more boys gaining a diagnosis as children. It seems there is a pattern of females being diagnosed at later ages (meaning less access to support and self-understanding). The study calls for better diagnostic practices and more research to address these gender differences.</p>","PeriodicalId":8724,"journal":{"name":"Autism","volume":" ","pages":"375-389"},"PeriodicalIF":5.6,"publicationDate":"2026-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12804396/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145386150","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2026-01-31DOI: 10.1177/13623613251410418
Saskia Bj Koch, Jordy van Langen, Jana Bašnáková, Arjen Stolk
<p><p>Autism is a neurodevelopmental condition characterized by persistent communication challenges, often compounded by social anxiety. Although differences in perspective-taking, cognitive flexibility, and social motivation have been implicated in these challenges, their influence on live interpersonal interactions remains unclear. In this study, we quantitatively examined how autistic and non-autistic individuals with varying levels of social anxiety adapted their communication during experimentally controlled interactions with two ostensibly distinct partners-a child and an adult-both portrayed by the same role-blind confederate. Autistic participants were equally motivated and capable as non-autistic participants in adjusting their communication to stereotypical assumptions about a partner's abilities, spontaneously using greater emphasis when addressing the presumed less capable child. However, they were less likely to modify these stereotype-driven behaviors in response to interaction-based evidence of partners' equal competence. While non-autistic participants dynamically adapted their communication to treat both partners equivalently, autistic participants maintained their stereotype-driven adjustments throughout the interaction. Preregistered analyses further linked non-autistic individuals' adaptive responses to early social exposure, a developmental factor not observed in autistic participants. Together, these findings highlight a core interactional capacity, shaped by early social experiences and operating on interaction-based evidence, as central to understanding communication challenges in autism.Lay abstractEveryday communication can be challenging for autistic individuals, particularly when social anxiety is involved. Research suggests that differences in understanding and adapting to others may contribute to these challenges, but it remains unclear whether and how these differences affect real-time interactions. This study invited autistic and non-autistic participants with varying levels of social anxiety to interact online with two "partners." One partner was introduced as a child and the other as an adult, although in reality the same actor played both roles without knowing which role he was assigned. All participants initially emphasized their communication more with the presumed child, whom they assumed was less capable. Over time, however, non-autistic participants adapted their approach, treating both partners equally as they gathered evidence that the child was just as competent as the adult. In contrast, autistic participants continued to treat the child as less capable throughout the interaction. Moreover, non-autistic participants who adapted more quickly tended to have experienced greater early social exposure in daycare, a relationship that was not observed in autistic participants. These findings suggest that while autistic individuals are willing and able to adjust their communication based on initial assumptions
{"title":"Partner-dependent communication without dynamic adaptation in autism.","authors":"Saskia Bj Koch, Jordy van Langen, Jana Bašnáková, Arjen Stolk","doi":"10.1177/13623613251410418","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1177/13623613251410418","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Autism is a neurodevelopmental condition characterized by persistent communication challenges, often compounded by social anxiety. Although differences in perspective-taking, cognitive flexibility, and social motivation have been implicated in these challenges, their influence on live interpersonal interactions remains unclear. In this study, we quantitatively examined how autistic and non-autistic individuals with varying levels of social anxiety adapted their communication during experimentally controlled interactions with two ostensibly distinct partners-a child and an adult-both portrayed by the same role-blind confederate. Autistic participants were equally motivated and capable as non-autistic participants in adjusting their communication to stereotypical assumptions about a partner's abilities, spontaneously using greater emphasis when addressing the presumed less capable child. However, they were less likely to modify these stereotype-driven behaviors in response to interaction-based evidence of partners' equal competence. While non-autistic participants dynamically adapted their communication to treat both partners equivalently, autistic participants maintained their stereotype-driven adjustments throughout the interaction. Preregistered analyses further linked non-autistic individuals' adaptive responses to early social exposure, a developmental factor not observed in autistic participants. Together, these findings highlight a core interactional capacity, shaped by early social experiences and operating on interaction-based evidence, as central to understanding communication challenges in autism.Lay abstractEveryday communication can be challenging for autistic individuals, particularly when social anxiety is involved. Research suggests that differences in understanding and adapting to others may contribute to these challenges, but it remains unclear whether and how these differences affect real-time interactions. This study invited autistic and non-autistic participants with varying levels of social anxiety to interact online with two \"partners.\" One partner was introduced as a child and the other as an adult, although in reality the same actor played both roles without knowing which role he was assigned. All participants initially emphasized their communication more with the presumed child, whom they assumed was less capable. Over time, however, non-autistic participants adapted their approach, treating both partners equally as they gathered evidence that the child was just as competent as the adult. In contrast, autistic participants continued to treat the child as less capable throughout the interaction. Moreover, non-autistic participants who adapted more quickly tended to have experienced greater early social exposure in daycare, a relationship that was not observed in autistic participants. These findings suggest that while autistic individuals are willing and able to adjust their communication based on initial assumptions ","PeriodicalId":8724,"journal":{"name":"Autism","volume":" ","pages":"13623613251410418"},"PeriodicalIF":5.6,"publicationDate":"2026-01-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146091859","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2026-01-31DOI: 10.1177/13623613251414302
Jo Halsall, Elise Robinson, Anna Cook, Adam Halsall, Laura Crane
Friendship has been identified as an important way to support autistic adolescents' social, emotional and cognitive development. However, research examining autistic adolescents' friendships has tended to use methodologies inaccessible to children with complex communication and learning needs. We examined the friendship experiences of 12 autistic adolescents (aged 12-15 years) with complex communication and learning needs who attended a specialist school. Using reflexive thematic analysis, we identified two themes. Within the first theme of 'reconceptualising friendship', the adolescents identified friends who evoked strong emotions and connection, without distinguishing between positive or negative interactions, or the standard boundaries of friendship. 'Friendships' with adults were also highlighted. Within the second theme of 'the context dependent nature of connection', the adolescents' descriptions of friendship communicated a preference for engagement via physical play in spaces that facilitated such interaction. Our findings underscore the importance of directly eliciting the views of autistic adolescents with complex communication and learning needs. They also highlight the value of facilitating opportunities to build social connection with peers and adults through physical play and activities that provoke strong emotions within a safe and contained context.Lay abstractFriendship plays a key role in helping autistic young people develop: socially, emotionally and cognitively. However, much of the research on friendships among autistic children and young people has overlooked those with complex communication and learning needs, using methods that are not accessible to them. As a result, their views on friendship have often been underreported. We investigated the friendship experiences of 12 autistic adolescents, aged between 12 and 15 years, who have complex communication and learning needs and attend a specialist school. By using methods that were adapted including visual resources, the children were able to share their views on friendship. Our two main findings were (1) children identified friends who evoked strong emotions and connection, without distinguishing between positive and negative interactions or the standard boundaries of friendship; and (2) children's descriptions of friendship communicated a preference for physical play in spaces that facilitated this. They also identified the need for space within structured settings. Our research gave the children the opportunity to identify their friends and express their preferences, offering important insights for future studies. These results highlight the value of supporting autistic children to build social connections by providing opportunities for active play and exploration of strong emotions within safe and familiar settings.
{"title":"Eliciting the views of autistic adolescents attending specialist schools on what friendships mean to them.","authors":"Jo Halsall, Elise Robinson, Anna Cook, Adam Halsall, Laura Crane","doi":"10.1177/13623613251414302","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1177/13623613251414302","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Friendship has been identified as an important way to support autistic adolescents' social, emotional and cognitive development. However, research examining autistic adolescents' friendships has tended to use methodologies inaccessible to children with complex communication and learning needs. We examined the friendship experiences of 12 autistic adolescents (aged 12-15 years) with complex communication and learning needs who attended a specialist school. Using reflexive thematic analysis, we identified two themes. Within the first theme of 'reconceptualising friendship', the adolescents identified friends who evoked strong emotions and connection, without distinguishing between positive or negative interactions, or the standard boundaries of friendship. 'Friendships' with adults were also highlighted. Within the second theme of 'the context dependent nature of connection', the adolescents' descriptions of friendship communicated a preference for engagement via physical play in spaces that facilitated such interaction. Our findings underscore the importance of directly eliciting the views of autistic adolescents with complex communication and learning needs. They also highlight the value of facilitating opportunities to build social connection with peers and adults through physical play and activities that provoke strong emotions within a safe and contained context.Lay abstractFriendship plays a key role in helping autistic young people develop: socially, emotionally and cognitively. However, much of the research on friendships among autistic children and young people has overlooked those with complex communication and learning needs, using methods that are not accessible to them. As a result, their views on friendship have often been underreported. We investigated the friendship experiences of 12 autistic adolescents, aged between 12 and 15 years, who have complex communication and learning needs and attend a specialist school. By using methods that were adapted including visual resources, the children were able to share their views on friendship. Our two main findings were (1) children identified friends who evoked strong emotions and connection, without distinguishing between positive and negative interactions or the standard boundaries of friendship; and (2) children's descriptions of friendship communicated a preference for physical play in spaces that facilitated this. They also identified the need for space within structured settings. Our research gave the children the opportunity to identify their friends and express their preferences, offering important insights for future studies. These results highlight the value of supporting autistic children to build social connections by providing opportunities for active play and exploration of strong emotions within safe and familiar settings.</p>","PeriodicalId":8724,"journal":{"name":"Autism","volume":" ","pages":"13623613251414302"},"PeriodicalIF":5.6,"publicationDate":"2026-01-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146091882","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Evidence supporting the association between breastfeeding patterns and autism is inconsistent. This study examined sociodemographic and birth factors related to breastfeeding duration and subsequent autism spectrum disorder (autism) diagnosis according to the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, 5th Edition, compared to a neurotypically developing cohort, based on electronic health records. Demographics, feeding preferences, and breastfeeding duration as reported by parents during routine baby wellness visits were analyzed for a cohort of 11,766 (1.9%) children with autism spectrum disorder diagnosis and a random subsample of 12,000 (2.03%) neurotypically developing children. Autism spectrum disorder diagnosis was based on a national autism registry and assigned after electronic health records were completed. Preterm, very low birth weight, multiple births, and complex medical comorbidities were excluded. Infants subsequently diagnosed with autism were breastfed for an average of 5.0 months, 1.5 months shorter than neurotypically developing. Fewer autism spectrum disorder infants were exclusively breastfed in the first year of life. Two-way analysis of variance indicated a significant effect of socioeconomic status and autism spectrum disorder on breastfeeding duration, and a significant interaction of socioeconomic status with autism spectrum disorder. Shorter breastfeeding duration among infants with subsequent autism spectrum disorder was confirmed, calling for closer monitoring for autism traits in infants with breastfeeding difficulties. These challenges were independent of birth parameters; however, they were influenced by socioeconomic factors.Lay AbstractThis study found that infants later diagnosed with autism were breastfed for a shorter duration than their typically developing peers, with differences influenced by socioeconomic status. These findings highlight the importance of monitoring breastfeeding challenges as a potential early indicator of autism, particularly in families of mid-range socioeconomic status.
{"title":"Breastfeeding and autism: An electronic health records study of baby wellness visit records.","authors":"Ayelet Ben-Sasson, Aviva Mimouni-Bloch, Sukaina Samhat-Darawshi, Keren Ilann, Lidia V Gabis","doi":"10.1177/13623613251409334","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1177/13623613251409334","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Evidence supporting the association between breastfeeding patterns and autism is inconsistent. This study examined sociodemographic and birth factors related to breastfeeding duration and subsequent autism spectrum disorder (autism) diagnosis according to the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, 5<sup>th</sup> Edition, compared to a neurotypically developing cohort, based on electronic health records. Demographics, feeding preferences, and breastfeeding duration as reported by parents during routine baby wellness visits were analyzed for a cohort of 11,766 (1.9%) children with autism spectrum disorder diagnosis and a random subsample of 12,000 (2.03%) neurotypically developing children. Autism spectrum disorder diagnosis was based on a national autism registry and assigned after electronic health records were completed. Preterm, very low birth weight, multiple births, and complex medical comorbidities were excluded. Infants subsequently diagnosed with autism were breastfed for an average of 5.0 months, 1.5 months shorter than neurotypically developing. Fewer autism spectrum disorder infants were exclusively breastfed in the first year of life. Two-way analysis of variance indicated a significant effect of socioeconomic status and autism spectrum disorder on breastfeeding duration, and a significant interaction of socioeconomic status with autism spectrum disorder. Shorter breastfeeding duration among infants with subsequent autism spectrum disorder was confirmed, calling for closer monitoring for autism traits in infants with breastfeeding difficulties. These challenges were independent of birth parameters; however, they were influenced by socioeconomic factors.Lay AbstractThis study found that infants later diagnosed with autism were breastfed for a shorter duration than their typically developing peers, with differences influenced by socioeconomic status. These findings highlight the importance of monitoring breastfeeding challenges as a potential early indicator of autism, particularly in families of mid-range socioeconomic status.</p>","PeriodicalId":8724,"journal":{"name":"Autism","volume":" ","pages":"13623613251409334"},"PeriodicalIF":5.6,"publicationDate":"2026-01-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146091852","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}