Pub Date : 2025-07-09eCollection Date: 2025-01-01DOI: 10.1080/08998280.2025.2524791
Taha Mansoor, Mahmoud Ismayl, Sachin Parikh, Vijay Nambi, Salim S Virani, Anurag Mehta, Xiaoming Jia, Abdul Mannan Khan Minhas
Background: Lipoprotein(a) (Lp(a)) is an low-density lipoprotein (LDL)-like particle whose elevation is considered a causal risk factor for atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD) and calcific aortic valve stenosis. Currently, there are no published clinical trials showing whether Lp(a) lowering in conjunction with optimal LDL cholesterol control reduces ASCVD risk.
Methods: Clinicaltrials.gov, an online database for clinical research studies, was used to identify ongoing clinical trials studying targeted Lp(a) lowering pharmacotherapy as of May 2025. Twelve clinical studies met the criteria and were included in this summary.
Results: The three large, multicenter phase 3 outcome trials evaluating clinical cardiovascular disease endpoints of major adverse cardiac event (MACE) are Lp(a)HORIZON (NCT04023552), OCEAN(a) (NCT05581303), and ACCLAIM-Lpa(a) (NCT06292013), which investigate pelacarsen, olpasiran, and lepodisiran, respectively. Other phase 2 and phase 3 trials are also under way.
Conclusion: Results from upcoming trials will inform us whether Lp(a) reductions translate to improved cardiovascular clinical outcomes.
{"title":"Emerging pharmacological strategies in lipoprotein(a) reduction.","authors":"Taha Mansoor, Mahmoud Ismayl, Sachin Parikh, Vijay Nambi, Salim S Virani, Anurag Mehta, Xiaoming Jia, Abdul Mannan Khan Minhas","doi":"10.1080/08998280.2025.2524791","DOIUrl":"10.1080/08998280.2025.2524791","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Lipoprotein(a) (Lp(a)) is an low-density lipoprotein (LDL)-like particle whose elevation is considered a causal risk factor for atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD) and calcific aortic valve stenosis. Currently, there are no published clinical trials showing whether Lp(a) lowering in conjunction with optimal LDL cholesterol control reduces ASCVD risk.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Clinicaltrials.gov, an online database for clinical research studies, was used to identify ongoing clinical trials studying targeted Lp(a) lowering pharmacotherapy as of May 2025. Twelve clinical studies met the criteria and were included in this summary.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The three large, multicenter phase 3 outcome trials evaluating clinical cardiovascular disease endpoints of major adverse cardiac event (MACE) are Lp(a)HORIZON (NCT04023552), OCEAN(a) (NCT05581303), and ACCLAIM-Lpa(a) (NCT06292013), which investigate pelacarsen, olpasiran, and lepodisiran, respectively. Other phase 2 and phase 3 trials are also under way.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Results from upcoming trials will inform us whether Lp(a) reductions translate to improved cardiovascular clinical outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":8828,"journal":{"name":"Baylor University Medical Center Proceedings","volume":"38 5","pages":"783-786"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2025-07-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12351719/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144871135","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-07-09eCollection Date: 2025-01-01DOI: 10.1080/08998280.2025.2527009
{"title":"Avocations.","authors":"","doi":"10.1080/08998280.2025.2527009","DOIUrl":"10.1080/08998280.2025.2527009","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":8828,"journal":{"name":"Baylor University Medical Center Proceedings","volume":"38 5","pages":"651"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2025-07-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12367227/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144940735","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-07-09eCollection Date: 2025-01-01DOI: 10.1080/08998280.2025.2522617
Taha Mansoor, Ali Bin Abdul Jabbar, Salim Virani, Abdul Mannan Khan Minhas
Objective: To compare cardiovascular disease (CVD) attributable to environmental, metabolic, and behavioral risk factor trends in Pakistan and globally.
Methods: We used the Global Burden of Disease 2019 to determine the number of deaths, disability-adjusted life years, age-standardized mortality rates (ASMR) per 100,000, and age-standardized disability-adjusted life years (ASDRs) per 100,000 by age, sex, year, sociodemographic index, regions, and countries.
Results: In Pakistan, the ASMR per 100,000 (329 to 358; estimated annual percentage change [EAPC] 0.09) and ASDR per 100,000 (7327 to 7989; EAPC 0.09) for CVD remained stable with an inverted U-shaped trend. On the other hand, the global ASMR per 100,000 (354 to 240; EAPC -0.32) and ASDR per 100,000 (7085 to 4864; EAPC -0.31) for CVD decreased. Both globally and in Pakistan, the highest ASMR and ASDR of CVD were attributable to high systolic blood pressure followed by dietary risks. Out of 204 countries and territories worldwide, Pakistan ranked 49th for SBP and 33rd for dietary risks in terms of ASMR attributable to these risk factors in 2019.
Conclusion: CVD disease burden in Pakistan remains prominent, with CVD ASMR and ASDR trends attributable to various risk factors displaying unfavorable patterns compared to global trends.
{"title":"Burden of cardiovascular disease attributable to risk factors in Pakistan: insight from Global Burden of Disease Study 2019.","authors":"Taha Mansoor, Ali Bin Abdul Jabbar, Salim Virani, Abdul Mannan Khan Minhas","doi":"10.1080/08998280.2025.2522617","DOIUrl":"10.1080/08998280.2025.2522617","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To compare cardiovascular disease (CVD) attributable to environmental, metabolic, and behavioral risk factor trends in Pakistan and globally.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We used the Global Burden of Disease 2019 to determine the number of deaths, disability-adjusted life years, age-standardized mortality rates (ASMR) per 100,000, and age-standardized disability-adjusted life years (ASDRs) per 100,000 by age, sex, year, sociodemographic index, regions, and countries.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In Pakistan, the ASMR per 100,000 (329 to 358; estimated annual percentage change [EAPC] 0.09) and ASDR per 100,000 (7327 to 7989; EAPC 0.09) for CVD remained stable with an inverted U-shaped trend. On the other hand, the global ASMR per 100,000 (354 to 240; EAPC -0.32) and ASDR per 100,000 (7085 to 4864; EAPC -0.31) for CVD decreased. Both globally and in Pakistan, the highest ASMR and ASDR of CVD were attributable to high systolic blood pressure followed by dietary risks. Out of 204 countries and territories worldwide, Pakistan ranked 49th for SBP and 33rd for dietary risks in terms of ASMR attributable to these risk factors in 2019.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>CVD disease burden in Pakistan remains prominent, with CVD ASMR and ASDR trends attributable to various risk factors displaying unfavorable patterns compared to global trends.</p>","PeriodicalId":8828,"journal":{"name":"Baylor University Medical Center Proceedings","volume":"38 5","pages":"600-614"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2025-07-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12351722/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144871128","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-07-09eCollection Date: 2025-01-01DOI: 10.1080/08998280.2025.2523725
Grant S Shewmaker, Bola Aladegbami
{"title":"Just-in-time simulation for ad hoc teams: applications for surgical trainees.","authors":"Grant S Shewmaker, Bola Aladegbami","doi":"10.1080/08998280.2025.2523725","DOIUrl":"10.1080/08998280.2025.2523725","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":8828,"journal":{"name":"Baylor University Medical Center Proceedings","volume":"38 5","pages":"673-674"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2025-07-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12351745/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144871142","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-07-08eCollection Date: 2025-01-01DOI: 10.1080/08998280.2025.2524877
Linley E Watson, Rodney A Light, Courtney Shaver
Objective: This study assessed the ability of a real-time artificial intelligence (AI) tool to correctly align early during hospitalization with the discharge status of inpatient versus observation.
Methods: This retrospective case-control study at Baylor Scott & White Medical Center - Temple involved patients on 11 randomly chosen calendar days between August 2023 and October 2024. A real-time AI care level score (CLS) and machine learning likelihood (MeL) recommendations for inpatient versus observation discharge status were developed. Receiver operating characteristic curves were used to compare CLS, MeL, and commercial screening tool criteria with actual inpatient versus observation discharge status.
Results: The receiver operating characteristic curve for CLS-based prediction of the MeL recommendation for inpatients had the highest area under the curve (AUC) of 0.9954 (95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.9954, 0.9998). The AUC for only CLS for predicting inpatient discharge was 0.8949 (95% CI = 0.8692, 0.9206). A CLS score ≥76 resulted in the highest correct classification rate of 86%. For CLS and the commercial screening tool, the AUC was the lowest at 0.8419 (95% CI = 0.8121, 0.871).
Conclusions: Patients with a real-time AI CLS ≥76 had an 86% correct assignment of inpatient discharge status.
目的:本研究评估了实时人工智能(AI)工具在住院早期与住院患者出院状态和观察状态正确对齐的能力。方法:这项回顾性病例对照研究在Baylor Scott & White Medical Center - Temple,在2023年8月至2024年10月期间随机选择11个日历日的患者。制定了实时AI护理水平评分(CLS)和机器学习可能性(MeL)对住院患者和观察出院状态的建议。接受者工作特征曲线用于比较CLS、MeL和商业筛选工具标准与实际住院患者和观察出院状态。结果:基于cls预测住院患者MeL推荐的受试者工作特征曲线曲线下面积(AUC)最高,为0.9954(95%可信区间[CI] = 0.9954, 0.9998)。仅CLS预测住院患者出院的AUC为0.8949 (95% CI = 0.8692, 0.9206)。CLS评分≥76时,正确分类率最高,为86%。对于CLS和商业筛选工具,AUC最低,为0.8419 (95% CI = 0.8121, 0.871)。结论:实时AI CLS≥76的患者对住院出院状态的正确分配为86%。
{"title":"Ability of artificial intelligence to correctly predict inpatient versus observation hospital discharge status.","authors":"Linley E Watson, Rodney A Light, Courtney Shaver","doi":"10.1080/08998280.2025.2524877","DOIUrl":"10.1080/08998280.2025.2524877","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study assessed the ability of a real-time artificial intelligence (AI) tool to correctly align early during hospitalization with the discharge status of inpatient versus observation.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This retrospective case-control study at Baylor Scott & White Medical Center - Temple involved patients on 11 randomly chosen calendar days between August 2023 and October 2024. A real-time AI care level score (CLS) and machine learning likelihood (MeL) recommendations for inpatient versus observation discharge status were developed. Receiver operating characteristic curves were used to compare CLS, MeL, and commercial screening tool criteria with actual inpatient versus observation discharge status.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The receiver operating characteristic curve for CLS-based prediction of the MeL recommendation for inpatients had the highest area under the curve (AUC) of 0.9954 (95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.9954, 0.9998). The AUC for only CLS for predicting inpatient discharge was 0.8949 (95% CI = 0.8692, 0.9206). A CLS score ≥76 resulted in the highest correct classification rate of 86%. For CLS and the commercial screening tool, the AUC was the lowest at 0.8419 (95% CI = 0.8121, 0.871).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Patients with a real-time AI CLS ≥76 had an 86% correct assignment of inpatient discharge status.</p>","PeriodicalId":8828,"journal":{"name":"Baylor University Medical Center Proceedings","volume":"38 5","pages":"662-665"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2025-07-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12351743/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144871212","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-07-08eCollection Date: 2025-01-01DOI: 10.1080/08998280.2025.2520125
Mridul Bansal, Aryan Mehta, D Lynn Morris, Chirag Mehta, Jacob C Jentzer, Sean van Diepen, J Dawn Abbott, Saraschandra Vallabhajosyula
Background: This study sought to assess the outcomes of pulmonary embolism (PE) admissions at teaching and nonteaching hospitals in the month of July, when new trainees begin their training in the United States.
Methods: During 2016-2021, adult (≥18 years) nonelective admissions with PE, admitted to urban teaching hospitals in the months of May and July, were identified using the National Inpatient Sample and compared to nonteaching admissions. Outcomes of interest included in-hospital mortality, complications, variations in management, total hospitalization costs, and hospitalization duration.
Results: From January 1, 2016, to December 31, 2021, 164,244 PE admissions were identified in May and July to teaching (76.5%) and nonteaching (23.5%) hospitals. The May and July cohorts had comparable baseline characteristics at both teaching and nonteaching hospitals. The rates of organ failure, noncardiac and cardiac organ support, cardiogenic shock, and cardiac arrest were comparable across all four cohorts. Use of systemic thrombolysis (3.8% vs 3.1%; P = 0.002) and catheter-directed therapies (4.1% vs 3.8%; P = 0.05) were higher in the teaching hospitals in July than in May, but there were no differences in nonteaching hospitals. The cohorts of teaching (3.0% vs 3.3%, P = 0.30) and nonteaching hospitals (2.7% vs 2.2%, P = 0.15) had comparable adjusted in-hospital mortality in May and July. Hospitalization duration, total hospitalization costs, and discharge disposition were comparable in all four cohorts.
Conclusion: In this large 6-year US analysis, there were no differences in the outcomes of PE admissions to teaching and nonteaching hospitals in the months of May and July, arguing against the 'July effect.'
背景:本研究旨在评估7月份在教学医院和非教学医院肺栓塞(PE)入院的结果,7月份是新学员在美国开始培训的时候。方法:选取2016-2021年5月和7月在城市教学医院住院的成人(≥18岁)非选择性PE患者,并与非教学住院患者进行比较。研究的结果包括住院死亡率、并发症、治疗方法的变化、总住院费用和住院时间。结果:2016年1月1日至2021年12月31日,5月和7月共收治教学医院(76.5%)和非教学医院(23.5%)PE患者164244例。5月和7月的队列在教学医院和非教学医院的基线特征具有可比性。在所有四个队列中,器官衰竭、非心脏和心脏器官支持、心源性休克和心脏骤停的发生率具有可比性。7月教学医院全体性溶栓使用率(3.8%比3.1%,P = 0.002)和导管定向治疗使用率(4.1%比3.8%,P = 0.05)高于5月,非教学医院无差异。5月和7月,教学医院(3.0% vs 3.3%, P = 0.30)和非教学医院(2.7% vs 2.2%, P = 0.15)的调整后住院死亡率具有可比性。在所有四个队列中,住院时间、总住院费用和出院处置具有可比性。结论:在这项为期6年的美国大型分析中,在5月和7月,教学医院和非教学医院的体育招生结果没有差异,这与“7月效应”相悖。
{"title":"'July effect' in management and outcomes of patients admitted with pulmonary embolism in the United States, 2016 to 2021.","authors":"Mridul Bansal, Aryan Mehta, D Lynn Morris, Chirag Mehta, Jacob C Jentzer, Sean van Diepen, J Dawn Abbott, Saraschandra Vallabhajosyula","doi":"10.1080/08998280.2025.2520125","DOIUrl":"10.1080/08998280.2025.2520125","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>This study sought to assess the outcomes of pulmonary embolism (PE) admissions at teaching and nonteaching hospitals in the month of July, when new trainees begin their training in the United States.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>During 2016-2021, adult (≥18 years) nonelective admissions with PE, admitted to urban teaching hospitals in the months of May and July, were identified using the National Inpatient Sample and compared to nonteaching admissions. Outcomes of interest included in-hospital mortality, complications, variations in management, total hospitalization costs, and hospitalization duration.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>From January 1, 2016, to December 31, 2021, 164,244 PE admissions were identified in May and July to teaching (76.5%) and nonteaching (23.5%) hospitals. The May and July cohorts had comparable baseline characteristics at both teaching and nonteaching hospitals. The rates of organ failure, noncardiac and cardiac organ support, cardiogenic shock, and cardiac arrest were comparable across all four cohorts. Use of systemic thrombolysis (3.8% vs 3.1%; <i>P</i> = 0.002) and catheter-directed therapies (4.1% vs 3.8%; <i>P</i> = 0.05) were higher in the teaching hospitals in July than in May, but there were no differences in nonteaching hospitals. The cohorts of teaching (3.0% vs 3.3%, <i>P</i> = 0.30) and nonteaching hospitals (2.7% vs 2.2%, <i>P</i> = 0.15) had comparable adjusted in-hospital mortality in May and July. Hospitalization duration, total hospitalization costs, and discharge disposition were comparable in all four cohorts.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>In this large 6-year US analysis, there were no differences in the outcomes of PE admissions to teaching and nonteaching hospitals in the months of May and July, arguing against the 'July effect.'</p>","PeriodicalId":8828,"journal":{"name":"Baylor University Medical Center Proceedings","volume":"38 5","pages":"675-682"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2025-07-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12351753/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144871141","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-07-08eCollection Date: 2025-01-01DOI: 10.1080/08998280.2025.2519596
Christine L Frissora, Emily A Miller, Thalia Matos, Andrea Betesh, Steven Lipkin, Melissa K Frey, Felice Schnoll-Sussman
Background: Individuals with Lynch syndrome face up to a 60% lifetime risk of developing endometrial and gastrointestinal cancer. Established guidelines recommend colonoscopies every 1 to 2 years beginning at age 20 to 25 and endometrial biopsy every 1 to 2 years beginning at age 30 to 35. We evaluated the patient experience with a combined endometrial biopsy and gastrointestinal cancer screening procedure for patients with Lynch syndrome.
Methods: Patients with Lynch syndrome undergoing combined colon and endometrial screening from June 2021 to September 2023 were prospectively enrolled. Patients had both procedures during a single session using propofol sedation. Appropriate patients also underwent upper endoscopy. Patient satisfaction was assessed by questionnaire. Surveys were distributed to patients via email 1 day after their procedure. Twenty patients were enrolled, and 18 completed the survey (90%).
Results: None of the patients reported pain during the procedure. The average combined procedure duration was 42 minutes (range 27-59) and average total operating room time was 54 minutes (range 37-93). One patient was found to have complex atypical endometrial hyperplasia and had a hysterectomy for stage 1 A uterine clear cell carcinoma. There were no cases of colon or gastric cancer. A total of six adenomatous polyps and five serrated polyps were removed.
Conclusion: Patients with Lynch syndrome undergoing One-Stop Colon and Endometrial Screening (ONCE) reported high satisfaction with the combined procedure. To maximize patient care, physicians and health care systems should consider support for and investment in the implementation of combined screening approaches.
{"title":"One-Stop Colon and Endometrial Screening (ONCE): a prospective study of combined cancer screening for Lynch syndrome.","authors":"Christine L Frissora, Emily A Miller, Thalia Matos, Andrea Betesh, Steven Lipkin, Melissa K Frey, Felice Schnoll-Sussman","doi":"10.1080/08998280.2025.2519596","DOIUrl":"10.1080/08998280.2025.2519596","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Individuals with Lynch syndrome face up to a 60% lifetime risk of developing endometrial and gastrointestinal cancer. Established guidelines recommend colonoscopies every 1 to 2 years beginning at age 20 to 25 and endometrial biopsy every 1 to 2 years beginning at age 30 to 35. We evaluated the patient experience with a combined endometrial biopsy and gastrointestinal cancer screening procedure for patients with Lynch syndrome.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Patients with Lynch syndrome undergoing combined colon and endometrial screening from June 2021 to September 2023 were prospectively enrolled. Patients had both procedures during a single session using propofol sedation. Appropriate patients also underwent upper endoscopy. Patient satisfaction was assessed by questionnaire. Surveys were distributed to patients via email 1 day after their procedure. Twenty patients were enrolled, and 18 completed the survey (90%).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>None of the patients reported pain during the procedure. The average combined procedure duration was 42 minutes (range 27-59) and average total operating room time was 54 minutes (range 37-93). One patient was found to have complex atypical endometrial hyperplasia and had a hysterectomy for stage 1 A uterine clear cell carcinoma. There were no cases of colon or gastric cancer. A total of six adenomatous polyps and five serrated polyps were removed.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Patients with Lynch syndrome undergoing One-Stop Colon and Endometrial Screening (ONCE) reported high satisfaction with the combined procedure. To maximize patient care, physicians and health care systems should consider support for and investment in the implementation of combined screening approaches.</p>","PeriodicalId":8828,"journal":{"name":"Baylor University Medical Center Proceedings","volume":"38 5","pages":"646-649"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2025-07-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12351693/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144871170","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-07-07eCollection Date: 2025-01-01DOI: 10.1080/08998280.2025.2527561
Laurel B Kilpatrick, Shawnta Pittman-Hobbs
{"title":"When training isn't enough: lessons from a pediatric serious illness communication pilot.","authors":"Laurel B Kilpatrick, Shawnta Pittman-Hobbs","doi":"10.1080/08998280.2025.2527561","DOIUrl":"10.1080/08998280.2025.2527561","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":8828,"journal":{"name":"Baylor University Medical Center Proceedings","volume":"38 5","pages":"656-657"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2025-07-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12351728/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144871246","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-07-07eCollection Date: 2025-01-01DOI: 10.1080/08998280.2025.2524301
Mohammed As'ad, Nawarh Faran
{"title":"Digital maturity scores as gatekeepers for health AI: useful proxy or false comfort?","authors":"Mohammed As'ad, Nawarh Faran","doi":"10.1080/08998280.2025.2524301","DOIUrl":"10.1080/08998280.2025.2524301","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":8828,"journal":{"name":"Baylor University Medical Center Proceedings","volume":"38 5","pages":"779-782"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2025-07-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12351740/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144871132","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-07-07eCollection Date: 2025-01-01DOI: 10.1080/08998280.2025.2523726
Joanne L Blum
{"title":"Boundaries.","authors":"Joanne L Blum","doi":"10.1080/08998280.2025.2523726","DOIUrl":"10.1080/08998280.2025.2523726","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":8828,"journal":{"name":"Baylor University Medical Center Proceedings","volume":"38 5","pages":"767-768"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2025-07-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12351729/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144871127","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}