首页 > 最新文献

GMS health technology assessment最新文献

英文 中文
Review on the medical and health economic evidence for an inclusion of colposcopy in primary screening programs for cervical cancer. 将阴道镜检查纳入宫颈癌初级筛查计划的医学和健康经济证据综述。
Pub Date : 2007-08-10
Marc Nocon, Thomas Mittendorf, Stephanie Roll, Wolfgang Greiner, Stefan N Willich, Johann-Matthias von der Schulenburg

Introduction: With 3.2% of all cancer cases in 2002, cervical carcinoma is the tenth most common cancer in Germany and causes 1.8% of all cancer deaths in women in Germany. To date diagnosis in Germany solely has been based on cervical cytology which has been criticised due to its low sensitivity and consequently high rate of false negative results.

Objectives: How does colposcopy compare to cytological tests in terms of sensitivity and specificity, and what may be the effects of changes in screening for cervical carcinoma in Germany? Is there health economic evidence that may foster an inclusion of colposcopy into national screening programms?

Methods: A systematic literature review was performed, including studies that compared colposcopy to cervical cytology in terms of sensitivity and specificity. In addition, a systematic review of the relevant health economic literature was performed to analyse cost-effectiveness issues relevant to the German setting.

Results: A total of four studies fulfilled the inclusion criteria, of which only two were of high methodologic quality. In all studies, the sensitivity of colposcopy was lower than that of cytology. In three studies the specificity of colposcopy was lower than that of cytology, in one study specificity of colposcopy and cytology was similar. No health economic data suggesting positive effects of adding colposcopy in primary screening could be identified.

Discussion: Only few studies have compared the test criteria of colposcopy with those of cytology for screening in cervical cancer. In all studies, sensitivity of colposcopy was even lower than the sensitivity of cytology, which has been critisized because of its low sensitivity.

Conclusion: Based on the present data, an inclusion of colposcopy in primary cervical cancer screening programmes can not be recommended.

导读:2002年,宫颈癌占所有癌症病例的3.2%,是德国第十大最常见的癌症,占德国妇女癌症死亡人数的1.8%。迄今为止,德国的诊断完全基于宫颈细胞学,由于其低灵敏度和高假阴性结果率而受到批评。目的:阴道镜检查与细胞学检查在敏感性和特异性方面的比较,以及德国宫颈癌筛查的变化可能产生的影响?是否有健康经济证据可以促进将阴道镜检查纳入国家筛查计划?方法:进行了系统的文献综述,包括比较阴道镜检查和宫颈细胞学检查在敏感性和特异性方面的研究。此外,对相关卫生经济学文献进行了系统回顾,以分析与德国环境相关的成本效益问题。结果:共有4项研究符合纳入标准,其中只有2项方法学质量高。在所有研究中,阴道镜检查的敏感性低于细胞学检查。在三项研究中,阴道镜检查的特异性低于细胞学检查的特异性,在一项研究中,阴道镜检查与细胞学检查的特异性相似。没有健康经济数据表明在初次筛查中加入阴道镜检查有积极作用。讨论:只有少数研究比较了阴道镜检查和细胞学检查的宫颈癌筛查标准。在所有的研究中,阴道镜检查的灵敏度甚至低于细胞学检查的灵敏度,因其灵敏度低而受到批评。结论:基于目前的数据,阴道镜检查不建议纳入原发性宫颈癌筛查计划。
{"title":"Review on the medical and health economic evidence for an inclusion of colposcopy in primary screening programs for cervical cancer.","authors":"Marc Nocon,&nbsp;Thomas Mittendorf,&nbsp;Stephanie Roll,&nbsp;Wolfgang Greiner,&nbsp;Stefan N Willich,&nbsp;Johann-Matthias von der Schulenburg","doi":"","DOIUrl":"","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>With 3.2% of all cancer cases in 2002, cervical carcinoma is the tenth most common cancer in Germany and causes 1.8% of all cancer deaths in women in Germany. To date diagnosis in Germany solely has been based on cervical cytology which has been criticised due to its low sensitivity and consequently high rate of false negative results.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>How does colposcopy compare to cytological tests in terms of sensitivity and specificity, and what may be the effects of changes in screening for cervical carcinoma in Germany? Is there health economic evidence that may foster an inclusion of colposcopy into national screening programms?</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A systematic literature review was performed, including studies that compared colposcopy to cervical cytology in terms of sensitivity and specificity. In addition, a systematic review of the relevant health economic literature was performed to analyse cost-effectiveness issues relevant to the German setting.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of four studies fulfilled the inclusion criteria, of which only two were of high methodologic quality. In all studies, the sensitivity of colposcopy was lower than that of cytology. In three studies the specificity of colposcopy was lower than that of cytology, in one study specificity of colposcopy and cytology was similar. No health economic data suggesting positive effects of adding colposcopy in primary screening could be identified.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>Only few studies have compared the test criteria of colposcopy with those of cytology for screening in cervical cancer. In all studies, sensitivity of colposcopy was even lower than the sensitivity of cytology, which has been critisized because of its low sensitivity.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Based on the present data, an inclusion of colposcopy in primary cervical cancer screening programmes can not be recommended.</p>","PeriodicalId":89142,"journal":{"name":"GMS health technology assessment","volume":"3 ","pages":"Doc07"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2007-08-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/02/10/HTA-03-07.PMC3011337.pdf","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"29645451","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Benefits and risks of hormonal contraception for women. 激素避孕对女性的益处和风险。
Pub Date : 2007-08-10
Vitali Gorenoi, Matthias P Schönermark, Anja Hagen

Scientific background: A large proportion of women of reproductive age in Germany use various methods of pregnancy prevention (contraception), among them various hormone-based methods. Hormonal contraceptives may be divided into combined estrogen-progestogen contraceptives (pills, skin patches, vaginal rings), progestogen-only contraceptives (pills, injections, implants, hormone spirals) and emergency contraceptives.

Research questions: The evaluation addressed the question of benefits and risks of hormonal contraceptives, their economic effects as well as their ethical-social and legal implications.

Methods: A systematic literature search was conducted in April 2006 starting from 2000. The evaluation is primarily based on systematic reviews.

Results: In perfect use, all hormonal contraceptives excluding emergency contraceptives proved to be the most effective reversible contraceptive methods (rate of unintended pregnancies 0.05% to 0.3%). However, the typical use of oral contraceptives, injections, skin patches, and vaginal rings, which also considers possible application errors, showed a lower contraceptive efficacy (rate of unintended pregnancies 3% to 8%). It was lower than that of copper spirals. The risk of venous thromboembolism increased three to six times in users of hormonal contraceptives, the risks of stroke and myocardial infarction two to three times. The risk declined after discontinuation of use. The effects were estrogen-dose and progestogen-type dependent. The use of hormonal contraceptives showed a relative risk of ovarian and endometrial carcinomas of approximately 0.5 or 0.7, of breast and cervical cancer of approximately 1.2 or 1.6. The effect remained several years after discontinuation of use. The results concerning hepatocellular carcinoma suggested a carcinogenic effect. In women with acne, an improvement due to use of hormonal contraceptives was proven. Cervical chlamydial infections were more frequent in users of hormonal contraception. Headache appeared mostly only at the beginning of the use of combined oral contraceptives. Progestogen-only contraceptives worsened the results of the glucose tolerance test. A review of low evidence reported further risks of hormonal contraceptives (concerning menstrual problems, ovarian cysts, bone density, thyroid diseases and rheumatoid arthritis) as well as further benefits (concerning blood pressure and Crohn's disease). Hormonal spirals were shown to be more effective than spirals which do not release hormones. In emergency contraception, Levonorgestrel was more effective than the Yuzpe method. Most other proven differences between hormonal contraceptives were related to menstrual problems. After spirals with or without hormone release, the other hormonal contraceptives were shown in typical use to be the second most cost-effective reversible methods of contraception.

Discussion

科学背景:德国很大一部分育龄妇女使用各种预防怀孕(避孕)的方法,其中包括各种以激素为基础的方法。激素避孕药可分为雌激素-孕激素联合避孕药(药丸、皮肤贴片、阴道环)、纯孕激素避孕药(药丸、注射、植入、激素螺旋)和紧急避孕药。研究问题:评价讨论了激素避孕药的益处和风险问题,它们的经济影响以及它们的伦理-社会和法律影响。方法:从2000年开始,于2006年4月进行系统的文献检索。评价主要基于系统评价。结果:在完美使用的情况下,除紧急避孕药外,所有激素避孕药均为最有效的可逆避孕方法(意外妊娠率为0.05% ~ 0.3%)。然而,通常使用口服避孕药、注射、皮肤贴片和阴道环,也考虑到可能的应用错误,避孕效果较低(意外怀孕率为3%至8%)。它比铜螺旋的低。服用激素避孕药的人静脉血栓栓塞的风险增加了3 - 6倍,中风和心肌梗死的风险增加了2 - 3倍。停药后风险下降。其效果与雌激素剂量和孕激素类型相关。使用激素避孕药显示卵巢癌和子宫内膜癌的相对风险约为0.5或0.7,乳腺癌和宫颈癌的相对风险约为1.2或1.6。停止使用后,效果仍保持数年。有关肝细胞癌的结果表明其具有致癌作用。在患有痤疮的女性中,由于使用激素避孕药而得到改善。宫颈衣原体感染在使用激素避孕的人群中更为常见。头痛主要只在开始使用联合口服避孕药时出现。单孕激素避孕药使葡萄糖耐量试验结果恶化。对低证据的审查报告了激素避孕药的进一步风险(涉及月经问题、卵巢囊肿、骨密度、甲状腺疾病和类风湿性关节炎)以及进一步的益处(涉及血压和克罗恩病)。激素螺旋比不释放激素的螺旋更有效。在紧急避孕中,左炔诺孕酮比Yuzpe法更有效。其他大多数已证实的激素避孕药之间的差异都与月经问题有关。在有或没有激素释放的螺旋之后,其他激素避孕药在典型使用中被证明是第二最具成本效益的可逆避孕方法。讨论:所提出的问题只能在相对较低的证据水平上得到回答,部分仅适用于在德国不再使用的雌激素剂量的应用。对德国现状进行分析的初级卫生经济学研究结果的可转移性是有限的(来自低证据水平的过时信息源的临床假设,来自美国卫生系统的成本假设)。结论:在完善使用时,应将激素避孕药列为最有效的可逆避孕方法。对于使用激素避孕的个人决定,益处应该与额外的风险相关。如果不可能完美使用,则应优先考虑螺旋等替代方法。在这种情况下,从健康经济学的角度来看,螺旋也更可取。从现有数据中无法得出任何伦理-社会或法律结论。
{"title":"Benefits and risks of hormonal contraception for women.","authors":"Vitali Gorenoi,&nbsp;Matthias P Schönermark,&nbsp;Anja Hagen","doi":"","DOIUrl":"","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Scientific background: </strong>A large proportion of women of reproductive age in Germany use various methods of pregnancy prevention (contraception), among them various hormone-based methods. Hormonal contraceptives may be divided into combined estrogen-progestogen contraceptives (pills, skin patches, vaginal rings), progestogen-only contraceptives (pills, injections, implants, hormone spirals) and emergency contraceptives.</p><p><strong>Research questions: </strong>The evaluation addressed the question of benefits and risks of hormonal contraceptives, their economic effects as well as their ethical-social and legal implications.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A systematic literature search was conducted in April 2006 starting from 2000. The evaluation is primarily based on systematic reviews.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In perfect use, all hormonal contraceptives excluding emergency contraceptives proved to be the most effective reversible contraceptive methods (rate of unintended pregnancies 0.05% to 0.3%). However, the typical use of oral contraceptives, injections, skin patches, and vaginal rings, which also considers possible application errors, showed a lower contraceptive efficacy (rate of unintended pregnancies 3% to 8%). It was lower than that of copper spirals. The risk of venous thromboembolism increased three to six times in users of hormonal contraceptives, the risks of stroke and myocardial infarction two to three times. The risk declined after discontinuation of use. The effects were estrogen-dose and progestogen-type dependent. The use of hormonal contraceptives showed a relative risk of ovarian and endometrial carcinomas of approximately 0.5 or 0.7, of breast and cervical cancer of approximately 1.2 or 1.6. The effect remained several years after discontinuation of use. The results concerning hepatocellular carcinoma suggested a carcinogenic effect. In women with acne, an improvement due to use of hormonal contraceptives was proven. Cervical chlamydial infections were more frequent in users of hormonal contraception. Headache appeared mostly only at the beginning of the use of combined oral contraceptives. Progestogen-only contraceptives worsened the results of the glucose tolerance test. A review of low evidence reported further risks of hormonal contraceptives (concerning menstrual problems, ovarian cysts, bone density, thyroid diseases and rheumatoid arthritis) as well as further benefits (concerning blood pressure and Crohn's disease). Hormonal spirals were shown to be more effective than spirals which do not release hormones. In emergency contraception, Levonorgestrel was more effective than the Yuzpe method. Most other proven differences between hormonal contraceptives were related to menstrual problems. After spirals with or without hormone release, the other hormonal contraceptives were shown in typical use to be the second most cost-effective reversible methods of contraception.</p><p><strong>Discussion","PeriodicalId":89142,"journal":{"name":"GMS health technology assessment","volume":"3 ","pages":"Doc06"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2007-08-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/f4/a8/HTA-03-06.PMC3011324.pdf","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"29645450","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Efficacy and effectiveness of recombinant human activated protein C in severe sepsis of adults. 重组人活化蛋白C治疗成人严重脓毒症的疗效。
Pub Date : 2007-07-25
Helge Knut Schumacher, Jacqueline Müller-Nordhorn, Stefanie Roll, Stefan N Willich, Wolfgang Greiner

Introduction: Sepsis is defined as an invasion of microorganisms and/or their toxins into the blood associated the reaction of the organism to this invasion. Severe sepsis is a major cost driver in intensive care medicine. In Germany, prevalence data was assessed in the context of the German Prevalence Study. Severe sepsis has a prevalence of 35% in German intensive care units.

Research questions: THE FOLLOWING QUESTIONS WERE ANALYSED: is Drotrecogin alfa (activated) (DAA) effective in the treatment of patients with severe sepsis and a mixed risk of death, both in all patients and in different subgroups? Is DAA effective in the treatment of patients with severe sepsis and low risk of death? Is DAA cost effective in the treatment of patients with severe sepsis compared to placebo?

Methods: Only studies with adult patients are included. There are no other exclusion criteria. A systematic literature search is performed by the German Institute of Medical Documentation and Information (DIMDI). The literature search yielded as a total of 847 hits. After screening of the abstracts, 165 medical and 101 economic publications were chosen for full text appraisal.

Results: Therapy with DAA appears to be cost effective in reducing 28-day-mortality in patients with severe sepsis and a high risk of death. A high risk of death is indicated by the presence of multiorgan failure (≥2) and/or an APACHE-II-Score ≥25. Therapy with DAA is not associated with a long-term reduction of mortality at later follow-up assessments. Therapy with DAA is not associated with a long-term reduction of mortality at later follow-up assessments. Therapy with DAA is cost-effective in patients with multiorgan failure and/or an APACHE II Score (≥25). In patients with a lower risk of death, DAA is not cost-effective. Costs associated with bleeding events have been rarely included in cost calculations.

Discussion: DAA appears to reduce mortality in patients with severe sepsis and a high risk of death, but not in patients with a low risk of death. Bleeding events and mortality are considerable higher in studies in the usual care setting compared to clinical trials. In a number of subgroup analyses, both retrospectively and prospectively performed, DAA was not significantly associated with improved survival. The role of concurrent therapy with heparin is unclear, as DAA was only effective in reducing mortality in patients without heparin. There was no significant long-term survival benefit associated with DAA beyond the initial 28 days. Also, there is a lack of studies assessing prospectively functional ability, health-related quality of life, and morbidity in the long-term. In the subgroup of patients with a high risk of death, therapy with DAA ranges at the top level of generally accepted costs per LYG or QALY, in the subgroup of patients with low risk of death, cost effectiveness

简介:败血症的定义是微生物和/或其毒素侵入血液并引起机体对这种入侵的反应。严重败血症是重症监护医学的主要成本驱动因素。在德国,患病率数据是在德国患病率研究的背景下评估的。严重败血症在德国重症监护病房的患病率为35%。研究问题:对以下问题进行了分析:在所有患者和不同亚组中,罗曲高金(活化)(DAA)对严重脓毒症和混合死亡风险患者的治疗是否有效?DAA对严重脓毒症和低死亡风险患者是否有效?与安慰剂相比,DAA治疗严重脓毒症患者是否具有成本效益?方法:仅纳入成人患者的研究。没有其他的排除标准。德国医学文献与信息研究所(DIMDI)进行了系统的文献检索。文献检索总共产生了847个结果。摘要筛选后,165篇医学和101篇经济出版物被选中进行全文评价。结果:DAA治疗在降低严重脓毒症患者28天死亡率和高死亡风险方面具有成本效益。多器官功能衰竭(≥2)和/或apache - ii评分≥25表明存在高死亡风险。在后来的随访评估中,DAA治疗与死亡率的长期降低无关。在后来的随访评估中,DAA治疗与死亡率的长期降低无关。对于多器官功能衰竭和/或APACHE II评分(≥25)的患者,DAA治疗具有成本效益。对于死亡风险较低的患者,DAA不具有成本效益。与出血事件相关的费用很少包括在成本计算中。讨论:DAA似乎可以降低严重脓毒症和高死亡风险患者的死亡率,但对低死亡风险患者则没有作用。与临床试验相比,在常规护理环境中进行的研究中出血事件和死亡率要高得多。在许多回顾性和前瞻性亚组分析中,DAA与生存率的提高没有显著相关。与肝素同时治疗的作用尚不清楚,因为DAA仅对不使用肝素的患者降低死亡率有效。在最初的28天之后,DAA没有显著的长期生存益处。此外,缺乏评估远期功能能力、健康相关生活质量和长期发病率的研究。在死亡风险高的患者亚组中,DAA治疗在每LYG或QALY普遍接受成本的最高水平,在死亡风险低的患者亚组中,成本-效果比高于资源分配接受的成本-效果比。结论:由于DAA对严重脓毒症患者缺乏疗效,且死亡风险低,且在常规护理环境中出血率高,因此DAA治疗的适应症。在那些没有显著生存获益的亚组中,需要有足够样本量的前瞻性研究。关于严重脓毒症的异质性,在进一步的研究中必须考虑合并症和并发用药。需要采用替代研究设计的研究,例如比较单独使用肝素或与DAA联合使用肝素与安慰剂的研究,以及由不同的研究人员进行的研究。由于出血事件是DAA治疗相关的主要并发症,因此在未来的研究中也应考虑到出血事件引起的费用。
{"title":"Efficacy and effectiveness of recombinant human activated protein C in severe sepsis of adults.","authors":"Helge Knut Schumacher,&nbsp;Jacqueline Müller-Nordhorn,&nbsp;Stefanie Roll,&nbsp;Stefan N Willich,&nbsp;Wolfgang Greiner","doi":"","DOIUrl":"","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Sepsis is defined as an invasion of microorganisms and/or their toxins into the blood associated the reaction of the organism to this invasion. Severe sepsis is a major cost driver in intensive care medicine. In Germany, prevalence data was assessed in the context of the German Prevalence Study. Severe sepsis has a prevalence of 35% in German intensive care units.</p><p><strong>Research questions: </strong>THE FOLLOWING QUESTIONS WERE ANALYSED: is Drotrecogin alfa (activated) (DAA) effective in the treatment of patients with severe sepsis and a mixed risk of death, both in all patients and in different subgroups? Is DAA effective in the treatment of patients with severe sepsis and low risk of death? Is DAA cost effective in the treatment of patients with severe sepsis compared to placebo?</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Only studies with adult patients are included. There are no other exclusion criteria. A systematic literature search is performed by the German Institute of Medical Documentation and Information (DIMDI). The literature search yielded as a total of 847 hits. After screening of the abstracts, 165 medical and 101 economic publications were chosen for full text appraisal.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Therapy with DAA appears to be cost effective in reducing 28-day-mortality in patients with severe sepsis and a high risk of death. A high risk of death is indicated by the presence of multiorgan failure (≥2) and/or an APACHE-II-Score ≥25. Therapy with DAA is not associated with a long-term reduction of mortality at later follow-up assessments. Therapy with DAA is not associated with a long-term reduction of mortality at later follow-up assessments. Therapy with DAA is cost-effective in patients with multiorgan failure and/or an APACHE II Score (≥25). In patients with a lower risk of death, DAA is not cost-effective. Costs associated with bleeding events have been rarely included in cost calculations.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>DAA appears to reduce mortality in patients with severe sepsis and a high risk of death, but not in patients with a low risk of death. Bleeding events and mortality are considerable higher in studies in the usual care setting compared to clinical trials. In a number of subgroup analyses, both retrospectively and prospectively performed, DAA was not significantly associated with improved survival. The role of concurrent therapy with heparin is unclear, as DAA was only effective in reducing mortality in patients without heparin. There was no significant long-term survival benefit associated with DAA beyond the initial 28 days. Also, there is a lack of studies assessing prospectively functional ability, health-related quality of life, and morbidity in the long-term. In the subgroup of patients with a high risk of death, therapy with DAA ranges at the top level of generally accepted costs per LYG or QALY, in the subgroup of patients with low risk of death, cost effectiveness","PeriodicalId":89142,"journal":{"name":"GMS health technology assessment","volume":"3 ","pages":"Doc05"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2007-07-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/49/19/HTA-03-05.PMC3011332.pdf","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"29645449","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Long term substitution treatment (maintenance treatment) of opioid dependent persons. 阿片依赖者的长期替代治疗(维持治疗)。
Pub Date : 2007-03-27
Martin Busch, Sabine Haas, Marion Weigl, Charlotte Wirl

Health political background: Methadone substitution treatment in Germany is introduced in 1988 in the framework of a scientific pilot study in North Rhein Westphalia. Recent statistics show that by now a broad offer of substitution treatment exists. From 1 June 2002 to 31 December 2003 113,000 substitution treatments have been recorded as being started of which around 56,000 have been recorded as ongoing treatments by 1 December 2003.

Scientific background: Substitution treatment (treatment of opioid-dependent persons using substitution substances) is one part of addiction treatment. Its goals are harm reduction and the stabilisation of opioid dependent persons. Integration of opioid-dependent persons in a treatment-setting, reduction of consumption of psychoactive substances, reduction of risk behaviour (primarily related to infectious diseases), decrease of mortality and improvements concerning the social, psychic and physic situation are seen as a success of substitution treatment as maintenance therapy.

Research questions: The aim of this HTA report is to investigate which indicators can be used to evaluate the effectiveness of substitution treatment. Based on these indicators an evaluation of the medical, social and economical benefit of substitution treatment - also in relation to abstinence oriented treatment - is carried out.

Methods: A systematic literature search was performed in 31 international databases which yielded 2451 articles with publication date between 1995 and February 2005.

Results: After a twofold selection process 32 publications were included for assessment and 276 publications were used as background literature. Despite serious restrictions due to selection bias and dropout in most studies focusing on substitution treatment, reduction of consumption of illegal opioids, reduction of risk behaviour, criminal behaviour, mortality and incidence of HIV can be seen as an empirically proven success of substitution treatment. Concerning the improvement of life and health situation the results of the studies are contradictory. The results show that retention rate of substitution treatment is higher than retention rate of abstinence oriented treatment. Regarding economical aspects substitution treatment is efficient in avoiding secondary illnesses (infections) and decreasing criminality. From the perspective of medical ethics substitution treatment as well as medical prescription of heroin is in principle acceptable.

Discussion and conclusions: Based on these results, it can be recommended that substitution treatment in principle should be made available for all opioid dependent persons. The decision whether substitution treatment or another treatment (e. g. abstinence oriented treatment) is more promising has to take into account the individual situation of the client. In addition a combination o

健康政治背景:1988年,在北莱茵-威斯特伐利亚州的一项科学试点研究框架内,德国引入了美沙酮替代治疗。最近的统计数据显示,目前存在广泛的替代治疗。从2002年6月1日至2003年12月31日,已有113 000项替代治疗被记录为已开始,其中约56 000项被记录为截至2003年12月1日正在进行的治疗。科学背景:替代治疗(使用替代物质治疗阿片类药物依赖者)是成瘾治疗的一部分。其目标是减少危害和稳定阿片类药物依赖者。将阿片类药物依赖者纳入治疗环境,减少精神活性物质的消费,减少危险行为(主要与传染病有关),降低死亡率,改善社会、心理和身体状况,这些都被视为替代治疗作为维持治疗的成功。研究问题:本HTA报告的目的是调查哪些指标可用于评估替代治疗的有效性。在这些指标的基础上,对替代治疗的医疗、社会和经济效益进行了评估,也对以禁欲为导向的治疗进行了评估。方法:系统检索国际31个数据库,共收录1995 ~ 2005年2月发表的文献2451篇。结果:经过两次筛选,共纳入32篇文献进行评估,276篇文献作为背景文献。尽管在大多数侧重于替代治疗的研究中由于选择偏差和辍学而受到严重限制,但减少非法阿片类药物的消费、减少危险行为、犯罪行为、死亡率和艾滋病毒发病率可被视为经验证明的替代治疗的成功。关于生活和健康状况的改善,研究结果是矛盾的。结果表明,替代治疗的保留率高于戒断治疗的保留率。在经济方面,替代治疗在避免继发性疾病(感染)和减少犯罪方面是有效的。从医学伦理学的角度看,海洛因的替代治疗和医疗处方在原则上是可以接受的。讨论和结论:基于这些结果,可以建议原则上应该为所有阿片类药物依赖者提供替代治疗。决定替代治疗或另一种治疗(例如以戒断为导向的治疗)更有希望,必须考虑到客户的个人情况。此外,替代治疗和禁欲导向治疗的结合可能是有希望的,尽管缺乏关于这种方法的研究。在任何情况下,关于某种形式的治疗的决定都应抛开伪道德问题,并应根据既定的医学伦理原则——比如病人的利益——考虑到病人的具体情况作出决定。
{"title":"Long term substitution treatment (maintenance treatment) of opioid dependent persons.","authors":"Martin Busch,&nbsp;Sabine Haas,&nbsp;Marion Weigl,&nbsp;Charlotte Wirl","doi":"","DOIUrl":"","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Health political background: </strong>Methadone substitution treatment in Germany is introduced in 1988 in the framework of a scientific pilot study in North Rhein Westphalia. Recent statistics show that by now a broad offer of substitution treatment exists. From 1 June 2002 to 31 December 2003 113,000 substitution treatments have been recorded as being started of which around 56,000 have been recorded as ongoing treatments by 1 December 2003.</p><p><strong>Scientific background: </strong>Substitution treatment (treatment of opioid-dependent persons using substitution substances) is one part of addiction treatment. Its goals are harm reduction and the stabilisation of opioid dependent persons. Integration of opioid-dependent persons in a treatment-setting, reduction of consumption of psychoactive substances, reduction of risk behaviour (primarily related to infectious diseases), decrease of mortality and improvements concerning the social, psychic and physic situation are seen as a success of substitution treatment as maintenance therapy.</p><p><strong>Research questions: </strong>The aim of this HTA report is to investigate which indicators can be used to evaluate the effectiveness of substitution treatment. Based on these indicators an evaluation of the medical, social and economical benefit of substitution treatment - also in relation to abstinence oriented treatment - is carried out.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A systematic literature search was performed in 31 international databases which yielded 2451 articles with publication date between 1995 and February 2005.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>After a twofold selection process 32 publications were included for assessment and 276 publications were used as background literature. Despite serious restrictions due to selection bias and dropout in most studies focusing on substitution treatment, reduction of consumption of illegal opioids, reduction of risk behaviour, criminal behaviour, mortality and incidence of HIV can be seen as an empirically proven success of substitution treatment. Concerning the improvement of life and health situation the results of the studies are contradictory. The results show that retention rate of substitution treatment is higher than retention rate of abstinence oriented treatment. Regarding economical aspects substitution treatment is efficient in avoiding secondary illnesses (infections) and decreasing criminality. From the perspective of medical ethics substitution treatment as well as medical prescription of heroin is in principle acceptable.</p><p><strong>Discussion and conclusions: </strong>Based on these results, it can be recommended that substitution treatment in principle should be made available for all opioid dependent persons. The decision whether substitution treatment or another treatment (e. g. abstinence oriented treatment) is more promising has to take into account the individual situation of the client. In addition a combination o","PeriodicalId":89142,"journal":{"name":"GMS health technology assessment","volume":"3 ","pages":"Doc04"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2007-03-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/51/14/HTA-03-04.PMC3011334.pdf","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"29645448","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Hormones for therapy of climacteric afflictions. 用于治疗更年期疾病的激素。
Pub Date : 2007-03-08
Stefanie Eberhardt, Werner Kulp, Johann-Matthias von der Schulenburg, Stefan N Willich, Thomas Keil, Wolfgang Greiner

Background: In Western countries hormone replacement therapy (HT) is widely used in the treatment of climacteric women who are affected with hot flashes and night sweats. Besides, long-term HT was frequently used to manage the higher risks for osteoporosis and heart attack in postmenopause. Estrogens alone or combined with progestin feature most frequently in HT.

Objectives: This HTA report addresses the questions on medical efficacy and cost-effectiveness of HT as a treatment of hot flashes and night sweats as well as in the primary prevention of osteoporosis and cardiovascular disease in postmenopause in general healthy women.

Methods: The literature search for articles published after 1998 was conducted in March 2004 in standard medical and economic databases. The analysis included randomised controlled trials, systematic reviews, meta-analysis and economic evaluations considering relevant clinical endpoints in English or German language. The quality of the studies was assessed using checklists corresponding to the study type.

Results: HT is highly effective in treating hot flashes in climacteric women. The question of economical efficiency cannot be answered due to the scarce database. As the positive effects (lower risk for fractures and endometrial cancer) do not outweigh the negative effects (higher risk for breast cancer and general cardiovascular risk) estrogen-progestin combination HT cannot be recommended for primary prevention of osteoporosis and cardiovascular disease in postmenopausal women.

Discussion: The observation period of most of the studies regarding therapy of hot flashes and night sweats were too short to evaluate possible risks of long-term HT. The economic publications assessing HT for this indication varied vastly in terms of applied methods and were not carried out with respect to the German health care system.

Conclusions: HT can be recommended in the short-term treatment of hot flashes and night sweats in climacteric women. To explore the economic effects of HT for this indication for Germany, studies constructed with respect to the German health care system are desirable.

背景:在西方国家,激素替代疗法(HT)被广泛应用于更年期妇女潮热和盗汗的治疗。此外,长期HT常用于控制绝经后骨质疏松症和心脏病发作的高风险。雌激素单独或联合黄体酮在HT中最常见。目的:本HTA报告探讨了激素治疗绝经后普通健康女性潮热、盗汗以及骨质疏松症和心血管疾病的医疗功效和成本效益问题。方法:于2004年3月在标准医学经济数据库中检索1998年以后发表的文献。分析包括随机对照试验、系统评价、荟萃分析和考虑相关临床终点的经济学评估,以英语或德语进行。使用与研究类型相对应的检查表评估研究的质量。结果:HT治疗更年期妇女潮热有较好的疗效。由于数据库的缺乏,经济效率的问题无法回答。由于雌激素-黄体酮联合HT的积极作用(降低骨折和子宫内膜癌的风险)不超过其消极作用(增加乳腺癌和一般心血管疾病的风险),因此不能推荐用于绝经后妇女骨质疏松症和心血管疾病的一级预防。讨论:大多数关于潮热和盗汗治疗的研究观察期太短,无法评估长期HT的可能风险。评估这种适应症的HT的经济出版物在应用方法方面差异很大,并且没有在德国卫生保健系统中进行。结论:HT可推荐用于更年期妇女潮热、盗汗的短期治疗。为了探讨HT对德国这一适应症的经济影响,需要对德国医疗保健系统进行研究。
{"title":"Hormones for therapy of climacteric afflictions.","authors":"Stefanie Eberhardt,&nbsp;Werner Kulp,&nbsp;Johann-Matthias von der Schulenburg,&nbsp;Stefan N Willich,&nbsp;Thomas Keil,&nbsp;Wolfgang Greiner","doi":"","DOIUrl":"","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>In Western countries hormone replacement therapy (HT) is widely used in the treatment of climacteric women who are affected with hot flashes and night sweats. Besides, long-term HT was frequently used to manage the higher risks for osteoporosis and heart attack in postmenopause. Estrogens alone or combined with progestin feature most frequently in HT.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>This HTA report addresses the questions on medical efficacy and cost-effectiveness of HT as a treatment of hot flashes and night sweats as well as in the primary prevention of osteoporosis and cardiovascular disease in postmenopause in general healthy women.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The literature search for articles published after 1998 was conducted in March 2004 in standard medical and economic databases. The analysis included randomised controlled trials, systematic reviews, meta-analysis and economic evaluations considering relevant clinical endpoints in English or German language. The quality of the studies was assessed using checklists corresponding to the study type.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>HT is highly effective in treating hot flashes in climacteric women. The question of economical efficiency cannot be answered due to the scarce database. As the positive effects (lower risk for fractures and endometrial cancer) do not outweigh the negative effects (higher risk for breast cancer and general cardiovascular risk) estrogen-progestin combination HT cannot be recommended for primary prevention of osteoporosis and cardiovascular disease in postmenopausal women.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>The observation period of most of the studies regarding therapy of hot flashes and night sweats were too short to evaluate possible risks of long-term HT. The economic publications assessing HT for this indication varied vastly in terms of applied methods and were not carried out with respect to the German health care system.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>HT can be recommended in the short-term treatment of hot flashes and night sweats in climacteric women. To explore the economic effects of HT for this indication for Germany, studies constructed with respect to the German health care system are desirable.</p>","PeriodicalId":89142,"journal":{"name":"GMS health technology assessment","volume":"3 ","pages":"Doc03"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2007-03-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/37/00/HTA-03-03.PMC3011326.pdf","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"29645447","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Evaluation of optical coherence tomography in the diagnosis of age related macula degeneration compared with fluorescence angiography. 光学相干断层扫描与荧光血管造影对年龄相关性黄斑变性诊断的评价。
Pub Date : 2007-02-20
Heidi Stürzlinger, Dieter Genser, Barbara Fröschl

Background: In industrialised nations age-related macular degeneration (AMD) is the most common cause of blindness and severe visual impairment. AMD is a disease of the retina characterized by the accumulation of metabolic products in the macula. In early stages drusen and pigment disorders occur, in late stages a dry form is distinguished from the exsudative form with choroidal neovascularisation. AMD causes vision disorders such as blurred vision of the central part of the visual field, leading finally to a dark spot. Several therapies are available for the exsudative form, however an exact diagnosis is partially essential. The gold standard for the diagnosis of AMD is fluorescein angiography (FA), an invasive investigation with intravenous application of a dye. Optical coherence tomography (OCT) is a more recent non-invasive procedure.

Objectives: The aim of this HTA report is to investigate the efficacy and efficiency of OCT compared to FA. Ethical, societal and legal aspects are also considered.

Methods: A systematic literature search was performed in 34 international databases which yielded 2324 articles. Eight publications were included for assessment, according to predefined selection criteria.

Results: The number of studies investigating OCT compared to FA in patients with AMD is presently very limited and the quality of the studies is generally low. The number of investigated patients is below 35 in four publications and in only one publication it is above 100. Moreover in most of the articles very selected patient groups are studied. Economic studies concerning the efficiency of OCT compared to FA cannot be identified.

Discussion: Even though the patient groups investigated and the objectives of the studies are very heterogenous, all publications uniformly show that OCT cannot replace FA. However, OCT yields additional diagnostic findings and may verify unclear findings of FA. Therefore the application of OCT in addition to FA is useful in many cases. With regard to costs German patients on average currently have to pay more for performing OCT than for performing FA.

Conclusion: Future studies have to show whether OCT may give diagnostic information essential for therapeutic decisions in addition to FA and whether it can replace FA in selected cases. The number of patients included in these studies should be high enough to answer relevant questions with sufficient statistical power. An economic model calculation can be built upon the resulting findings.

背景:在工业化国家,年龄相关性黄斑变性(AMD)是导致失明和严重视力障碍的最常见原因。黄斑变性是一种视网膜疾病,其特征是黄斑中代谢产物的积累。在早期阶段,出现色素性和色素紊乱,在晚期,干燥形式与脉络膜新生血管的渗出形式区别开来。AMD会引起视觉障碍,如视野中心部分视力模糊,最终导致黑斑。有几种治疗方法可用于渗出形式,但准确的诊断是部分必要的。AMD诊断的金标准是荧光素血管造影(FA),这是一种静脉应用染料的侵入性检查。光学相干断层扫描(OCT)是一种较新的非侵入性手术。目的:本HTA报告的目的是探讨OCT与FA的疗效和效率。伦理、社会和法律方面也被考虑在内。方法:系统检索国际34个数据库,共收录文献2324篇。根据预先确定的选择标准,纳入了8份出版物进行评估。结果:目前研究OCT与FA在AMD患者中的比较的研究数量非常有限,研究质量普遍较低。在四篇出版物中,调查的患者数量低于35例,只有一篇出版物的调查患者数量高于100例。此外,在大多数文章中,非常选定的患者群体进行了研究。关于OCT与FA相比效率的经济学研究无法确定。讨论:尽管调查的患者群体和研究的目的非常不同,但所有的出版物都一致表明OCT不能取代FA。然而,OCT可提供额外的诊断结果,并可能证实FA的不明确表现。因此,除FA外,OCT的应用在许多情况下都是有用的。在费用方面,德国患者目前平均需要为OCT支付比FA更多的费用。结论:未来的研究必须表明OCT是否可以提供除FA之外的诊断信息,以及它是否可以在选定的病例中替代FA。纳入这些研究的患者数量应足够高,以足够的统计力回答相关问题。经济模型计算可以建立在结果的基础上。
{"title":"Evaluation of optical coherence tomography in the diagnosis of age related macula degeneration compared with fluorescence angiography.","authors":"Heidi Stürzlinger,&nbsp;Dieter Genser,&nbsp;Barbara Fröschl","doi":"","DOIUrl":"","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>In industrialised nations age-related macular degeneration (AMD) is the most common cause of blindness and severe visual impairment. AMD is a disease of the retina characterized by the accumulation of metabolic products in the macula. In early stages drusen and pigment disorders occur, in late stages a dry form is distinguished from the exsudative form with choroidal neovascularisation. AMD causes vision disorders such as blurred vision of the central part of the visual field, leading finally to a dark spot. Several therapies are available for the exsudative form, however an exact diagnosis is partially essential. The gold standard for the diagnosis of AMD is fluorescein angiography (FA), an invasive investigation with intravenous application of a dye. Optical coherence tomography (OCT) is a more recent non-invasive procedure.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>The aim of this HTA report is to investigate the efficacy and efficiency of OCT compared to FA. Ethical, societal and legal aspects are also considered.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A systematic literature search was performed in 34 international databases which yielded 2324 articles. Eight publications were included for assessment, according to predefined selection criteria.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The number of studies investigating OCT compared to FA in patients with AMD is presently very limited and the quality of the studies is generally low. The number of investigated patients is below 35 in four publications and in only one publication it is above 100. Moreover in most of the articles very selected patient groups are studied. Economic studies concerning the efficiency of OCT compared to FA cannot be identified.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>Even though the patient groups investigated and the objectives of the studies are very heterogenous, all publications uniformly show that OCT cannot replace FA. However, OCT yields additional diagnostic findings and may verify unclear findings of FA. Therefore the application of OCT in addition to FA is useful in many cases. With regard to costs German patients on average currently have to pay more for performing OCT than for performing FA.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Future studies have to show whether OCT may give diagnostic information essential for therapeutic decisions in addition to FA and whether it can replace FA in selected cases. The number of patients included in these studies should be high enough to answer relevant questions with sufficient statistical power. An economic model calculation can be built upon the resulting findings.</p>","PeriodicalId":89142,"journal":{"name":"GMS health technology assessment","volume":"3 ","pages":"Doc02"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2007-02-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/86/c1/HTA-03-02.PMC3011331.pdf","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"29645446","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Validity and cost-effectiveness of methods for screening of primary open angle glaucoma. 原发性开角型青光眼筛查方法的有效性和成本效益。
Pub Date : 2007-02-07
Katja Antony, Dieter Genser, Barbara Fröschl

Health political background: About 950,000 people are affected by glaucoma in Germany, about 50% of which are undiagnosed. The German Ophthalmological Society and the German Association of Ophthalmologists recommend a screening for glaucoma according to their guidelines. The Federal Joint Committee disapproved a glaucoma-screening program on expense of the compulsory health insurance in 2004.

Scientific background: Primary open angle glaucoma is diagnosed by evaluation of the optic disc, the retinal fibre layer and the visual field. The main examinations are ophthalmoscopy, scanning laser polarimetry, confocal scanning laser ophthalmoscopy, retinal thickness analysis and optical coherence tomography. Scotomas are diagnosed by perimetry (standard automated perimetry, short wavelength automated perimetry and frequency doubling perimetry). The intraocular pressure is the most important treatable risk factor and is measured by (contact or non-contact) tonometry.

Research questions: The aim of this HTA-report is to investigate the diagnostic validity and cost effectiveness of diagnostic techniques or combinations of these methods with respect to the use in a screening setting in Germany.

Methods: A systematic literature research was performed in 35 international databases and yielded 2602 articles. Overall 57 publications were included for assessment, according to predefined selection criteria.

Results: The 55 medical articles deal mainly with frequency doubling perimetry, confocal scanning laser ophthalmoscopy and scanning laser polarimetry. Few articles cover short wavelength automated perimetry, tonometry and ophalmocopic evaluations by ophthalmologists. The quality of the papers is generally low, as far as the evidence in respect of screening is concerned. No single method exists with both, high sensitivity and high specificity for screening purpose. Data are also not sufficient to recommend combinations of methods. Only two economic models on cost-effectivenes of screening investigations could be identified. No economic evaluations of the most recent methods can be found in the published literature. A British cost-effectiveness analysis calculates cost per true positives and favours a combination of ophthalmoscopy, tonometry and perimetry either for people at high risk for glaucoma or for the total population as an initial examination. A Canadian HTA-report models the cost per year of blindness avoided. The report concludes that because of a high degree of uncertainty with respect to the benefits and the high costs involved, the setting-up of a glaucoma-screening program cannot be supported.

Discussion: The literature shows that combinations of methods have to be used for screening of glaucoma in order to get reasonable values of sensitivity and specificity. Presently no combination of methods and no algorithm can

健康政治背景:德国约有95万人患有青光眼,其中约50%未确诊。德国眼科学会和德国眼科医师协会建议根据他们的指南进行青光眼筛查。2004年,联邦联合委员会否决了一项由强制性健康保险支付费用的青光眼筛查计划。科学背景:原发性开角型青光眼是通过视盘、视网膜纤维层和视野的评估来诊断的。主要检查有检眼镜、扫描激光偏振仪、共聚焦扫描激光检眼镜、视网膜厚度分析和光学相干断层扫描。暗点的诊断方法为视界检查(标准自动视界检查、短波自动视界检查和倍频视界检查)。眼压是最重要的可治疗的危险因素,可通过(接触或非接触)眼压计测量。研究问题:本hta报告的目的是调查诊断技术或这些方法的组合在德国筛查环境中使用的诊断有效性和成本效益。方法:对35个国际数据库进行系统文献检索,共收录2602篇文献。根据预先确定的选择标准,总共包括57份出版物供评估。结果:55篇医学文献主要涉及倍频验光术、共聚焦扫描激光验光术和扫描激光偏振术。很少有文章涉及眼科医生的短波自动视距测量、眼压测量和验光评估。就筛选方面的证据而言,论文的质量普遍较低。没有一种方法既具有高灵敏度又具有高特异性。数据也不足以推荐各种方法的组合。关于筛选调查的成本效益,只能确定两种经济模式。在已发表的文献中找不到对最新方法的经济评价。英国的一项成本效益分析计算了每个真阳性的成本,并倾向于将眼科检查、眼压测量和验光结合起来,无论是对青光眼高风险人群还是对全体人群,作为初始检查。加拿大卫生协会的一份报告模拟了每年避免失明的成本。该报告的结论是,由于效益的高度不确定性和所涉及的高成本,不能支持建立青光眼筛查计划。讨论:文献表明,青光眼的筛查必须采用多种方法的组合,以获得合理的敏感性和特异性值。目前还没有联合的方法和算法可以提供足够的证据用于青光眼筛查。此外,根据现有文献,无法对德国的成本效益作出结论。结论:为了找到青光眼筛查方法的最佳组合,必须进行基于人群的研究。因此,关于青光眼筛查方法的成本-效果也没有最终的结论。临床有效筛查方法的经济评价应考虑避免失明的效果,以及对预防视力损害的效果。
{"title":"Validity and cost-effectiveness of methods for screening of primary open angle glaucoma.","authors":"Katja Antony,&nbsp;Dieter Genser,&nbsp;Barbara Fröschl","doi":"","DOIUrl":"","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Health political background: </strong>About 950,000 people are affected by glaucoma in Germany, about 50% of which are undiagnosed. The German Ophthalmological Society and the German Association of Ophthalmologists recommend a screening for glaucoma according to their guidelines. The Federal Joint Committee disapproved a glaucoma-screening program on expense of the compulsory health insurance in 2004.</p><p><strong>Scientific background: </strong>Primary open angle glaucoma is diagnosed by evaluation of the optic disc, the retinal fibre layer and the visual field. The main examinations are ophthalmoscopy, scanning laser polarimetry, confocal scanning laser ophthalmoscopy, retinal thickness analysis and optical coherence tomography. Scotomas are diagnosed by perimetry (standard automated perimetry, short wavelength automated perimetry and frequency doubling perimetry). The intraocular pressure is the most important treatable risk factor and is measured by (contact or non-contact) tonometry.</p><p><strong>Research questions: </strong>The aim of this HTA-report is to investigate the diagnostic validity and cost effectiveness of diagnostic techniques or combinations of these methods with respect to the use in a screening setting in Germany.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A systematic literature research was performed in 35 international databases and yielded 2602 articles. Overall 57 publications were included for assessment, according to predefined selection criteria.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The 55 medical articles deal mainly with frequency doubling perimetry, confocal scanning laser ophthalmoscopy and scanning laser polarimetry. Few articles cover short wavelength automated perimetry, tonometry and ophalmocopic evaluations by ophthalmologists. The quality of the papers is generally low, as far as the evidence in respect of screening is concerned. No single method exists with both, high sensitivity and high specificity for screening purpose. Data are also not sufficient to recommend combinations of methods. Only two economic models on cost-effectivenes of screening investigations could be identified. No economic evaluations of the most recent methods can be found in the published literature. A British cost-effectiveness analysis calculates cost per true positives and favours a combination of ophthalmoscopy, tonometry and perimetry either for people at high risk for glaucoma or for the total population as an initial examination. A Canadian HTA-report models the cost per year of blindness avoided. The report concludes that because of a high degree of uncertainty with respect to the benefits and the high costs involved, the setting-up of a glaucoma-screening program cannot be supported.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>The literature shows that combinations of methods have to be used for screening of glaucoma in order to get reasonable values of sensitivity and specificity. Presently no combination of methods and no algorithm can","PeriodicalId":89142,"journal":{"name":"GMS health technology assessment","volume":"3 ","pages":"Doc01"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2007-02-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/30/38/HTA-03-01.PMC3011335.pdf","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"29645445","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Laparoscopic vs. open appendectomy: systematic review of medical efficacy and health economic analysis. 腹腔镜阑尾切除术与开放式阑尾切除术:疗效的系统评价和健康经济分析。
Pub Date : 2007-01-29
Vitali Gorenoi, Charalabos-Markos Dintsios, Matthias P Schönermark, Anja Hagen

Scientific background: Appendicitis is an inflammation of the appendix of the blind intestine. Appendicitis remains the most frequent cause for an acute abdomen. Both interventions, the open surgical (through opening of the abdominal cavity) as well as the laparoscopic approach (via insertion of an optic system and instruments into the abdominal cavity through three small incisions), are used for the excision of the inflamed appendix (appendectomy).

Research questions: The performed evaluation addresses questions on the medical effectiveness of the use of laparoscopic appendectomy in comparison with the classical open appendix excision as well as on its cost-effectiveness based on the German health system.

Methods: A literature search was conducted in October 2005 in the most important medical electronic databases. The medical analysis was performed on the basis of the most up to date systematic review (basic review) of randomized controlled studies (RCT), newly published RCT and on our own quantitative information synthesis of all studies as well as of selected methodologically high-value RCT. In the health economic analysis, relevant publications were evaluated and cost differences of both interventions were calculated.

Results: One systematic review and 56 primary studies were included in the medical evaluation, 24 of these studies were included in the conducted subanalysis on the basis of methodologically high-value studies. In total, a relation of three avoided wound infections per one additional intraabdominal abscess has to be expected by the use of laparoscopic appendectomy in com-parison with the open operation. Diagnostic laparoscopy reduces the rate of unclear diagnoses within the scope of planned appendectomy in fertile women. By routine, leaving the macroscopically bland appendix in situ, the rate of negative appendectomy is reduced significantly and profound. The results speak for a small advantage of the laparoscopic appendec-tomy with regard to pain intensity, the time until reintroduction of liquid and solid diet, time until first stool as well as for a slightly better cosmetic result and slightly better quality of life. In the contemporary practice in Germany, a longer operation time, a reduced length of hospital stay and a similar time to return to work have to be expected by the use of laparoscopic appendectomy in comparison with open appendectomy. In the current health care situation in Germany, the use of laparoscopic appendectomy is associated with additional operation costs of approximately 150 to 200 Euro compared with the open appendectomy. By approximately 200 Euro costs savings due to the shorter length of hospital stay, the total (direct and indirect) costs of in-patient care of both interventions seem to be similar. Due to similar indirect costs, the total costs of both interventions lie also in the same range and the incremental

科学背景:阑尾炎是盲肠阑尾的一种炎症。阑尾炎仍然是引起急腹症最常见的原因。两种干预措施,开放手术(通过打开腹腔)和腹腔镜方法(通过三个小切口将光学系统和仪器插入腹腔)都用于切除发炎的阑尾(阑尾切除术)。研究问题:所执行的评估解决了使用腹腔镜阑尾切除术与传统开放阑尾切除术的医疗有效性问题,以及基于德国卫生系统的成本效益问题。方法:于2005年10月在全国最重要的医学电子数据库中进行文献检索。医学分析是在随机对照研究(RCT)、新发表的RCT的最新系统评价(基本评价)和我们自己对所有研究的定量信息综合以及选择方法学上高价值的RCT的基础上进行的。在卫生经济学分析中,评估了相关出版物,并计算了两种干预措施的成本差异。结果:1项系统评价和56项初步研究被纳入医学评价,其中24项研究在方法学高价值研究的基础上被纳入进行的亚分析。总的来说,使用腹腔镜阑尾切除术与开放手术相比,每增加一个腹内脓肿就有三个避免伤口感染的关系。诊断性腹腔镜检查降低了在计划阑尾切除术范围内诊断不清的比率。通过常规手术,将宏观上无症状的阑尾保留原位,可以显著降低阑尾切除术的阴性率。结果表明腹腔镜阑尾切除术在疼痛强度、重新引入液体和固体饮食的时间、第一次大便的时间以及稍微更好的美容效果和稍微更好的生活质量方面有一点优势。在德国的当代实践中,与开放式阑尾切除术相比,使用腹腔镜阑尾切除术预计手术时间更长,住院时间缩短,恢复工作时间相似。在德国目前的医疗状况下,与开放式阑尾切除术相比,使用腹腔镜阑尾切除术的额外手术费用约为150至200欧元。由于住院时间缩短,节省了大约200欧元的费用,两种干预措施的住院护理总费用(直接和间接)似乎是相似的。由于间接成本相似,两种干预措施的总成本也处于相同的范围,两种技术的增量成本效益比被驱动为零。讨论:在费用计算中使用已进行的医学分析的结果,在与医学分析相同的证据水平上支持卫生-经济评价的结论。结论:与开放式阑尾切除术相比,腹腔镜阑尾切除术具有较小的优势(诊断、伤口感染、疼痛强度、美容效果和生活质量)和劣势(腹内脓肿)。从健康经济的角度来看,腹腔镜阑尾切除术和开放式阑尾切除术在直接住院费用和间接费用方面大致相似。因此,两种选择之间的决定应由医生个人作出。
{"title":"Laparoscopic vs. open appendectomy: systematic review of medical efficacy and health economic analysis.","authors":"Vitali Gorenoi,&nbsp;Charalabos-Markos Dintsios,&nbsp;Matthias P Schönermark,&nbsp;Anja Hagen","doi":"","DOIUrl":"","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Scientific background: </strong>Appendicitis is an inflammation of the appendix of the blind intestine. Appendicitis remains the most frequent cause for an acute abdomen. Both interventions, the open surgical (through opening of the abdominal cavity) as well as the laparoscopic approach (via insertion of an optic system and instruments into the abdominal cavity through three small incisions), are used for the excision of the inflamed appendix (appendectomy).</p><p><strong>Research questions: </strong>The performed evaluation addresses questions on the medical effectiveness of the use of laparoscopic appendectomy in comparison with the classical open appendix excision as well as on its cost-effectiveness based on the German health system.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A literature search was conducted in October 2005 in the most important medical electronic databases. The medical analysis was performed on the basis of the most up to date systematic review (basic review) of randomized controlled studies (RCT), newly published RCT and on our own quantitative information synthesis of all studies as well as of selected methodologically high-value RCT. In the health economic analysis, relevant publications were evaluated and cost differences of both interventions were calculated.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>One systematic review and 56 primary studies were included in the medical evaluation, 24 of these studies were included in the conducted subanalysis on the basis of methodologically high-value studies. In total, a relation of three avoided wound infections per one additional intraabdominal abscess has to be expected by the use of laparoscopic appendectomy in com-parison with the open operation. Diagnostic laparoscopy reduces the rate of unclear diagnoses within the scope of planned appendectomy in fertile women. By routine, leaving the macroscopically bland appendix in situ, the rate of negative appendectomy is reduced significantly and profound. The results speak for a small advantage of the laparoscopic appendec-tomy with regard to pain intensity, the time until reintroduction of liquid and solid diet, time until first stool as well as for a slightly better cosmetic result and slightly better quality of life. In the contemporary practice in Germany, a longer operation time, a reduced length of hospital stay and a similar time to return to work have to be expected by the use of laparoscopic appendectomy in comparison with open appendectomy. In the current health care situation in Germany, the use of laparoscopic appendectomy is associated with additional operation costs of approximately 150 to 200 Euro compared with the open appendectomy. By approximately 200 Euro costs savings due to the shorter length of hospital stay, the total (direct and indirect) costs of in-patient care of both interventions seem to be similar. Due to similar indirect costs, the total costs of both interventions lie also in the same range and the incremental","PeriodicalId":89142,"journal":{"name":"GMS health technology assessment","volume":"2 ","pages":"Doc22"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2007-01-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/25/2b/HTA-02-22.PMC3011343.pdf","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"29644602","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
What effects has the cataract surgery on the development and progression of Age-Related Macular Degeneration (AMD)? 白内障手术对老年性黄斑变性(AMD)的发生和发展有什么影响?
Pub Date : 2006-12-12
Angelina Bockelbrink, Andrej Rasch, Stephanie Roll, Stefan N Willich, Wolfgang Greiner

Background: The cataract (Cataracta senilis) is the most frequent eye disease of elderly people worldwide. In Germany, the cataract operation - with currently 450,000 interventions each year the most frequent operation in ophthalmology - can be seen as routine surgery. The age related macular degeneration (AMD) is a further one of the most common, age-related eye diseases and the most frequent cause of blindness of elderly people in industrial nations. Due to demographic changes an increasing number of patients will suffer from cataract and AMD at the same time. This coincidence leads to a greater interest in the question of a mutual influence of both diseases, respectively their therapies, on each other.

Objectives: The aim of this report was the evaluation of the medical and health economic effects of cataract operations on the development and progression of an age related macular degeneration (AMD). It was differentiated between first manifestations of AMD, progression of early stages of AMD and influence on further impairment in late stages of AMD.

Methods: The relevant publications for this report were identified by DIMDI via structured database enquiry as well as common, self-made enquiry and were evaluated, based on the criteria of evidence based medicine. The present report included German and English literature published since 1983.

Results: The database enquiry generated a record of 2769 issue-related publications. Eight medical publications were eligible for analysis in the course of the present HTA report. No relevant studies on health economical, ethical, social or legal issues could be included. Three epidemiological cohort studies provided some evidence for a promoting influence of cataract extractions on the progression of early types of AMD. Two of the epidemiological studies assessed the risk of first manifestation of AMD after cataract extraction. Both came up with up with increased incidences that did not reach statistical significance despite a large number of participants. Only one out of two clinical studies looked at further impairment in late stages of AMD and could not find an interrelation with cataract extraction. Thus the available evidence was not sufficient to come to a conclusion on the contribution of cataract extractions to the first manifestation of AMD and to the further impairment in late stages.

Discussion: The presentation of the evaluated literature made clear that only a small number of publications dealt with the development of age related macula degeneration in consequence of a cataract extraction. The overall scientific level of evidence of these articles was not very high. Therefore it was not possible to obtain a well-defined conclusion on the effect of a cataract extraction on the development or progression of an age related macula degeneration.

Conclusion: Additional

背景:老年性白内障(Cataracta senilis)是世界范围内老年人最常见的眼病。在德国,白内障手术——目前每年有45万例手术——是眼科中最常见的手术——可以被视为常规手术。年龄相关性黄斑变性(AMD)是另一种最常见的与年龄相关的眼病,也是工业国家老年人失明的最常见原因。由于人口结构的变化,越来越多的患者将同时患白内障和黄斑变性。这一巧合引起了人们对两种疾病的相互影响以及各自的治疗方法的更大兴趣。目的:本报告的目的是评估白内障手术对年龄相关性黄斑变性(AMD)发生和发展的医疗和健康经济影响。区分AMD的首发表现、早期AMD的进展以及晚期AMD对进一步损害的影响。方法:采用DIMDI系统,通过结构化数据库查询和常规查询、自制查询等方式对相关文献进行检索,并按照循证医学标准进行评价。本报告包括1983年以来出版的德文和英文文献。结果:数据库查询产生了2769份与问题有关的出版物。8份医学出版物有资格在本卫生事务管理局报告中进行分析。没有关于健康、经济、伦理、社会或法律问题的相关研究。三个流行病学队列研究提供了一些证据,证明白内障摘除对早期类型AMD的进展有促进作用。两项流行病学研究评估了白内障摘除术后首次出现黄斑变性的风险。两者都提出了增加的发病率,尽管参与者很多,但没有达到统计显著性。只有1 / 2的临床研究关注晚期黄斑变性的进一步损害,但没有发现与白内障摘除的相关性。因此,现有的证据不足以得出白内障摘除对AMD的首次表现和晚期进一步损害的贡献的结论。讨论:所评估文献的陈述清楚地表明,只有少数出版物涉及白内障摘除后与年龄相关的黄斑变性的发展。这些文章的总体科学证据水平不是很高。因此,对于白内障摘除对年龄相关性黄斑变性的发展或进展的影响,不可能得到一个明确的结论。结论:迫切需要更多的临床试验,提供足够的患者数量、研究时间长度和对年龄和白内障严重程度等混杂变量的充分控制。卫生、经济、伦理、社会和法律方面的问题可以而且应该在澄清上述医疗问题之后进行调查。
{"title":"What effects has the cataract surgery on the development and progression of Age-Related Macular Degeneration (AMD)?","authors":"Angelina Bockelbrink,&nbsp;Andrej Rasch,&nbsp;Stephanie Roll,&nbsp;Stefan N Willich,&nbsp;Wolfgang Greiner","doi":"","DOIUrl":"","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The cataract (Cataracta senilis) is the most frequent eye disease of elderly people worldwide. In Germany, the cataract operation - with currently 450,000 interventions each year the most frequent operation in ophthalmology - can be seen as routine surgery. The age related macular degeneration (AMD) is a further one of the most common, age-related eye diseases and the most frequent cause of blindness of elderly people in industrial nations. Due to demographic changes an increasing number of patients will suffer from cataract and AMD at the same time. This coincidence leads to a greater interest in the question of a mutual influence of both diseases, respectively their therapies, on each other.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>The aim of this report was the evaluation of the medical and health economic effects of cataract operations on the development and progression of an age related macular degeneration (AMD). It was differentiated between first manifestations of AMD, progression of early stages of AMD and influence on further impairment in late stages of AMD.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The relevant publications for this report were identified by DIMDI via structured database enquiry as well as common, self-made enquiry and were evaluated, based on the criteria of evidence based medicine. The present report included German and English literature published since 1983.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The database enquiry generated a record of 2769 issue-related publications. Eight medical publications were eligible for analysis in the course of the present HTA report. No relevant studies on health economical, ethical, social or legal issues could be included. Three epidemiological cohort studies provided some evidence for a promoting influence of cataract extractions on the progression of early types of AMD. Two of the epidemiological studies assessed the risk of first manifestation of AMD after cataract extraction. Both came up with up with increased incidences that did not reach statistical significance despite a large number of participants. Only one out of two clinical studies looked at further impairment in late stages of AMD and could not find an interrelation with cataract extraction. Thus the available evidence was not sufficient to come to a conclusion on the contribution of cataract extractions to the first manifestation of AMD and to the further impairment in late stages.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>The presentation of the evaluated literature made clear that only a small number of publications dealt with the development of age related macula degeneration in consequence of a cataract extraction. The overall scientific level of evidence of these articles was not very high. Therefore it was not possible to obtain a well-defined conclusion on the effect of a cataract extraction on the development or progression of an age related macula degeneration.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Additional","PeriodicalId":89142,"journal":{"name":"GMS health technology assessment","volume":"2 ","pages":"Doc21"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2006-12-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/46/6c/HTA-02-21.PMC3011353.pdf","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"29644601","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Screening of the hearing of newborns - Update. 新生儿听力筛查-最新情况。
Pub Date : 2006-11-27
Petra Schnell-Inderst, Silke Kunze, Franz Hessel, Eva Grill, Uwe Siebert, Andreas Nickisch, Hubertus von Voß, Jürgen Wasem

Introduction: Permanent congenital bilateral hearing loss (CHL) of moderate or greater degree (≥40 dB HL) is a rare disease, with a prevalence of about 1 to 3 per 1000 births. However, it is one of the most frequent congenital diseases. Reliance on physician observation and parental recognition has not been successful in the past in detecting significant hearing loss in the first year of life. With this strategy significant hearing losses have been detected in the second year of life. With two objective technologies based on physiologic response to sound, otoacoustic emissions (OAE) and auditory brainstem response (ABR) hearing screening in the first days of life is made possible.

Objectives: The objective of this health technology assessment report is to update the evaluation on clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of newborn hearing screening programs. Universal newborn hearing screening (UHNS) (i), selective screening of high risk newborns (ii), and the absence of a systematic screening program are compared for age at identification and age at hearing aid fitting of children with hearing loss. Secondly the potential benefits of early intervention are analysed. Costs and cost-effectiveness of newborn hearing screening programs are determined. This report is intended to make a contribution to the decision making whether and under which conditions a newborn hearing screening program should be reimbursed by the statutory sickness funds in Germany.

Methods: This health technology assessment report updates a former health technology assessment (Kunze et al. 2004 [1]). A systematic review of the literature was conducted, based on a documented search and selection of the literature using predefined inclusion and exclusion criteria and a documented extraction and appraisal of the included studies. To assess the cost-effectiveness of the different screening strategies in Germany the decision analytic Markov state model which had been developed in our former health technology assessment report was updated.

Results: Universal newborn hearing screening programs are able to substantially reduce the age at identification and the age at intervention of children with CHL to six months of age in the German health care setting. High coverage rates, low fail rates and - if tracking systems are implemented - high follow-up-rates to diagnostic evaluation for test positives were achieved. New publications on potential benefits of early intervention could not be retrieved. For a final assessment of cost-effectiveness of newborn hearing screening evidence based long-term data are lacking. Decision analytic models with lifelong time horizon assuming that early detection results in improved language abilities and lower educational costs and higher life time productivity showed a potential of UNHS for long term cost savings compared to selective screening and no screening. F

简介:中度或更高程度(≥40 dB HL)的永久性先天性双侧听力损失(CHL)是一种罕见的疾病,患病率约为每1000例新生儿中有1至3例。然而,它是最常见的先天性疾病之一。依靠医生的观察和父母的认可,在过去的一年里,在发现重大的听力损失是不成功的。采用这种策略后,在婴儿出生后第二年就会发现严重的听力损失。两种客观的技术基于对声音的生理反应,耳声发射(OAE)和听觉脑干反应(ABR)听力筛查在生命的第一天成为可能。目的:本卫生技术评估报告的目的是更新新生儿听力筛查项目的临床效果和成本效益评估。普遍新生儿听力筛查(UHNS) (i),高危新生儿选择性筛查(ii),以及缺乏系统筛查计划的听力损失儿童的识别年龄和助听器安装年龄进行了比较。其次,分析了早期干预的潜在益处。确定新生儿听力筛查项目的成本和成本效益。本报告旨在为德国新生儿听力筛查项目是否以及在何种条件下应由法定疾病基金报销的决策做出贡献。方法:本卫生技术评估报告更新了以前的卫生技术评估(Kunze et al. 2004[1])。根据预先确定的纳入和排除标准,对文献进行文献检索和选择,并对纳入的研究进行文献提取和评价,对文献进行了系统的综述。为了评估德国不同筛查策略的成本效益,更新了我们在以前的卫生技术评估报告中开发的决策分析马尔可夫状态模型。结果:在德国卫生保健机构中,普遍的新生儿听力筛查计划能够大大降低CHL儿童的识别年龄和干预年龄至6个月。实现了高覆盖率、低故障率和(如果实施了跟踪系统)对检测阳性诊断评估的高随访率。无法检索到关于早期干预潜在益处的新出版物。对于新生儿听力筛查成本效益的最终评估,缺乏基于长期数据的证据。终身时间范围的决策分析模型假设早期检测可以提高语言能力,降低教育成本,提高终身生产力,这表明与选择性筛查和不筛查相比,UNHS有可能节省长期成本。就短期成本效益而言,在诊断评估之前的时间范围内,有更多基于证据的数据可用。在德国,每例诊断的平均费用从16,000欧元到33,600欧元不等,因此与其他实施的新生儿筛查项目的费用相当。在德国卫生保健设置的选择性筛查成本的经验数据是缺乏的。我们的决策分析模型显示,选择性筛查更具成本效益,但仅检测到50%的先天性听力损失病例。讨论:有充分的证据表明,通过适当的质量管理,联合国儿童基金会的项目可以将干预开始时的年龄降低到6个月以下。到目前为止,没有迹象表明对检测结果为假阳性的儿童及其父母进行筛查会产生相当大的负面后果。然而,更难以证明早期干预对改善长期预后的有效性。由于伦理原因,早期干预儿童CHL听力损失疗效的随机临床试验是不合适的。对罕见疾病进行长期结果的前瞻性队列研究成本高昂,需要很长时间,同时早期干预对语言发展的实质性好处似乎是可能的。结论:应在德国实施一项由法定疾病基金报销的联合国卫生服务方案。为了实现高覆盖率,并且由于获得低假阳性率的条件较好,应在出生后在医院进行卫生保健。对于门诊分娩,额外的筛查措施,在门诊设置必须提供。
{"title":"Screening of the hearing of newborns - Update.","authors":"Petra Schnell-Inderst,&nbsp;Silke Kunze,&nbsp;Franz Hessel,&nbsp;Eva Grill,&nbsp;Uwe Siebert,&nbsp;Andreas Nickisch,&nbsp;Hubertus von Voß,&nbsp;Jürgen Wasem","doi":"","DOIUrl":"","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Permanent congenital bilateral hearing loss (CHL) of moderate or greater degree (≥40 dB HL) is a rare disease, with a prevalence of about 1 to 3 per 1000 births. However, it is one of the most frequent congenital diseases. Reliance on physician observation and parental recognition has not been successful in the past in detecting significant hearing loss in the first year of life. With this strategy significant hearing losses have been detected in the second year of life. With two objective technologies based on physiologic response to sound, otoacoustic emissions (OAE) and auditory brainstem response (ABR) hearing screening in the first days of life is made possible.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>The objective of this health technology assessment report is to update the evaluation on clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of newborn hearing screening programs. Universal newborn hearing screening (UHNS) (i), selective screening of high risk newborns (ii), and the absence of a systematic screening program are compared for age at identification and age at hearing aid fitting of children with hearing loss. Secondly the potential benefits of early intervention are analysed. Costs and cost-effectiveness of newborn hearing screening programs are determined. This report is intended to make a contribution to the decision making whether and under which conditions a newborn hearing screening program should be reimbursed by the statutory sickness funds in Germany.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This health technology assessment report updates a former health technology assessment (Kunze et al. 2004 [1]). A systematic review of the literature was conducted, based on a documented search and selection of the literature using predefined inclusion and exclusion criteria and a documented extraction and appraisal of the included studies. To assess the cost-effectiveness of the different screening strategies in Germany the decision analytic Markov state model which had been developed in our former health technology assessment report was updated.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Universal newborn hearing screening programs are able to substantially reduce the age at identification and the age at intervention of children with CHL to six months of age in the German health care setting. High coverage rates, low fail rates and - if tracking systems are implemented - high follow-up-rates to diagnostic evaluation for test positives were achieved. New publications on potential benefits of early intervention could not be retrieved. For a final assessment of cost-effectiveness of newborn hearing screening evidence based long-term data are lacking. Decision analytic models with lifelong time horizon assuming that early detection results in improved language abilities and lower educational costs and higher life time productivity showed a potential of UNHS for long term cost savings compared to selective screening and no screening. F","PeriodicalId":89142,"journal":{"name":"GMS health technology assessment","volume":"2 ","pages":"Doc20"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2006-11-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/58/cb/HTA-02-20.PMC3011344.pdf","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"29644600","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
期刊
GMS health technology assessment
全部 Acc. Chem. Res. ACS Applied Bio Materials ACS Appl. Electron. Mater. ACS Appl. Energy Mater. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces ACS Appl. Nano Mater. ACS Appl. Polym. Mater. ACS BIOMATER-SCI ENG ACS Catal. ACS Cent. Sci. ACS Chem. Biol. ACS Chemical Health & Safety ACS Chem. Neurosci. ACS Comb. Sci. ACS Earth Space Chem. ACS Energy Lett. ACS Infect. Dis. ACS Macro Lett. ACS Mater. Lett. ACS Med. Chem. Lett. ACS Nano ACS Omega ACS Photonics ACS Sens. ACS Sustainable Chem. Eng. ACS Synth. Biol. Anal. Chem. BIOCHEMISTRY-US Bioconjugate Chem. BIOMACROMOLECULES Chem. Res. Toxicol. Chem. Rev. Chem. Mater. CRYST GROWTH DES ENERG FUEL Environ. Sci. Technol. Environ. Sci. Technol. Lett. Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. IND ENG CHEM RES Inorg. Chem. J. Agric. Food. Chem. J. Chem. Eng. Data J. Chem. Educ. J. Chem. Inf. Model. J. Chem. Theory Comput. J. Med. Chem. J. Nat. Prod. J PROTEOME RES J. Am. Chem. Soc. LANGMUIR MACROMOLECULES Mol. Pharmaceutics Nano Lett. Org. Lett. ORG PROCESS RES DEV ORGANOMETALLICS J. Org. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. A J. Phys. Chem. B J. Phys. Chem. C J. Phys. Chem. Lett. Analyst Anal. Methods Biomater. Sci. Catal. Sci. Technol. Chem. Commun. Chem. Soc. Rev. CHEM EDUC RES PRACT CRYSTENGCOMM Dalton Trans. Energy Environ. Sci. ENVIRON SCI-NANO ENVIRON SCI-PROC IMP ENVIRON SCI-WAT RES Faraday Discuss. Food Funct. Green Chem. Inorg. Chem. Front. Integr. Biol. J. Anal. At. Spectrom. J. Mater. Chem. A J. Mater. Chem. B J. Mater. Chem. C Lab Chip Mater. Chem. Front. Mater. Horiz. MEDCHEMCOMM Metallomics Mol. Biosyst. Mol. Syst. Des. Eng. Nanoscale Nanoscale Horiz. Nat. Prod. Rep. New J. Chem. Org. Biomol. Chem. Org. Chem. Front. PHOTOCH PHOTOBIO SCI PCCP Polym. Chem.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1