Guillimeau was the first to use the term cesarean section (CS) in 1598, but this name became universal only in the 20th century. The many theories of the origin of this name will be discussed. This surgery has been reported to be performed in all cultures dating to ancient times. In the past, it was mainly done to deliver a live baby from a dead mother, hence the name postmortem CS (PMCS). Many heroes are reported to have been delivered this way. Old Jewish sacred books have made references to abdominal delivery. It was especially encouraged and often mandated in Catholicism. There is evidence that the operation was done in Muslim countries in the middle ages. Islamic rulings support the performance of PMCS. Now that most maternal deaths occur in the hospital, perimortem CS (PRMCS) is recommended for the delivery of a fetus after 24 weeks from a pregnant woman with cardiac arrest. It is believed that emergent delivery within four minutes of initiation of cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) improves the chances of success of maternal resuscitation and survival and increases the chance of delivering a neurologically intact neonate. It is agreed that physicians are not to be held legally liable for the performance of PMCS and PRMCS regardless of the outcome. The ethical aspects of these operations are also discussed including a discussion about PMCS for the delivery of women who have been declared brain dead.
{"title":"Postmortem and perimortem cesarean section: historical, religious and ethical considerations.","authors":"Hossam E Fadel","doi":"10.5915/43-3-7099","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.5915/43-3-7099","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Guillimeau was the first to use the term cesarean section (CS) in 1598, but this name became universal only in the 20th century. The many theories of the origin of this name will be discussed. This surgery has been reported to be performed in all cultures dating to ancient times. In the past, it was mainly done to deliver a live baby from a dead mother, hence the name postmortem CS (PMCS). Many heroes are reported to have been delivered this way. Old Jewish sacred books have made references to abdominal delivery. It was especially encouraged and often mandated in Catholicism. There is evidence that the operation was done in Muslim countries in the middle ages. Islamic rulings support the performance of PMCS. Now that most maternal deaths occur in the hospital, perimortem CS (PRMCS) is recommended for the delivery of a fetus after 24 weeks from a pregnant woman with cardiac arrest. It is believed that emergent delivery within four minutes of initiation of cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) improves the chances of success of maternal resuscitation and survival and increases the chance of delivering a neurologically intact neonate. It is agreed that physicians are not to be held legally liable for the performance of PMCS and PRMCS regardless of the outcome. The ethical aspects of these operations are also discussed including a discussion about PMCS for the delivery of women who have been declared brain dead.</p>","PeriodicalId":89859,"journal":{"name":"The Journal of IMA","volume":"43 3","pages":"194-200"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2011-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/cf/3d/jima-43-3-7099.PMC3516125.pdf","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"31378197","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
All known human societies have a worldview that deserves to be called religion; all religions must explain death. Anthropologists study the diversity of religious systems, present and past, in order to understand what is common to humanity. Rather than starting from the view of a particular revelation or set of doctrines, the anthropologist tries to step outside his or her own subjective worldview and identify patterns in the evolution of human thinking about the reality of physical death. Are humans the only animals that are conscious of death, or do we share sentiments observable in our closest living relatives, the chimpanzees? At what point in history did the concept of an afterlife, life in some spiritual sense after physical death, appear? Is the religious explanation of life and death a mere reflection of a communal social fact, as the sociologist Emil Durkheim suggested, or a shared psychological trait, as more recent scholars assert? Can and should the modern scientist make a definitive statement about the finality of death and human consciousness?
{"title":"The end of life, the ends of life: an anthropological view.","authors":"Daniel Martin Varisco","doi":"10.5915/43-7037","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.5915/43-7037","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>All known human societies have a worldview that deserves to be called religion; all religions must explain death. Anthropologists study the diversity of religious systems, present and past, in order to understand what is common to humanity. Rather than starting from the view of a particular revelation or set of doctrines, the anthropologist tries to step outside his or her own subjective worldview and identify patterns in the evolution of human thinking about the reality of physical death. Are humans the only animals that are conscious of death, or do we share sentiments observable in our closest living relatives, the chimpanzees? At what point in history did the concept of an afterlife, life in some spiritual sense after physical death, appear? Is the religious explanation of life and death a mere reflection of a communal social fact, as the sociologist Emil Durkheim suggested, or a shared psychological trait, as more recent scholars assert? Can and should the modern scientist make a definitive statement about the finality of death and human consciousness?</p>","PeriodicalId":89859,"journal":{"name":"The Journal of IMA","volume":"43 3","pages":"203-7"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2011-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.5915/43-7037","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"31378199","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
For at least 50 years informed consent in medicine has focused on the principle of autonomy. Recently, attention has been given to informed consent being a shared decision. A primary mandate to do what is in the best interest of the patient still remains. The shared view looks to expand beyond the dyadic image of doctor and patient, to acknowledge the essential contribution to be made to informed consent from the cultural, religious, and personal values. This paper explores some of the cultural aspects of Islam that should influence informed consent.
{"title":"Informed consent with a focus on islamic views.","authors":"Samuel Packer","doi":"10.5915/43-3-9040","DOIUrl":"10.5915/43-3-9040","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>For at least 50 years informed consent in medicine has focused on the principle of autonomy. Recently, attention has been given to informed consent being a shared decision. A primary mandate to do what is in the best interest of the patient still remains. The shared view looks to expand beyond the dyadic image of doctor and patient, to acknowledge the essential contribution to be made to informed consent from the cultural, religious, and personal values. This paper explores some of the cultural aspects of Islam that should influence informed consent.</p>","PeriodicalId":89859,"journal":{"name":"The Journal of IMA","volume":"43 3","pages":"215-8"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2011-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/a3/40/jima-43-3-9040.PMC3516121.pdf","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"31378201","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
What does Islam have to offer health-care ethics that cannot be found elsewhere? I do not mean to suggest that there is only one answer to this question, because there are many. However, I will focus on the elevated status of the patient as the recipient of compassionate care. Today, the primary medical ethical issue is no longer a quandary such as “Should we withdraw artificial nutrition and hydration from a 90-year-old man with dementia?” Such questions are, of course, important. However, the primary issue is that the medical profession is losing its soul to technology and dehumanized care in which patients feel overbiologized and depersonalized, nothing more than “the kidney in room 5.” I ask you here today, in the name of Allah the merciful and compassionate, to be the ones who provide leadership in solving this crisis in medical care. Historians of medical ethics and bioethics rightly begin with Hippocratic ethics (400-300 BCE). We are familiar with the Hippocratic Oath and its influence. One finds in the ancient Greeks and Romans absolutely no passionate concern for the patient. There is no sense that the Hippocratic physician should go out of his way to help a needy patient. The spirit of Greco-Roman medical ethics is more or less casual with regard to the patient’s good. One has no image of the physician who goes out of his way or sacrifices ease in order to respond to the patient in need. In fact, for all its strengths, the Hippocratic ethos excludes from care slaves, poor people, and dying patients. Certainly the oath is clear in prohibiting the use of a deadly drug or abortifacient. It affirms confidentiality and “do no harm” and has many other strengths. But that passion for the patient in need, no matter how inconvenient, is simply not part of the ethos. The Hippocratic tradition is elitist, rather than devoted to patients in the spirit of equal regard. It really operates at the level of medicine as a career (careo) rather than anything deeper. There is no real call to serve. Then comes the great period of the Judeo, Christian, and Islamic traditions (est. 400 to 1750 CE). Here the physician is no longer casual but rather called by God to heal the sick regardless of their circumstances, degree of illness, or ability to pay. The Islamic Code of Medical Ethics of 1981, ratified by the First International Conference on Islamic Medicine and endorsed by many Islamic countries, vividly articulates this depth of calling to serve the needy. Article DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.5915/43-3-9219 Video DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.5915/43-3-9219V Compassionate Care Panel Discussion
{"title":"Compassionate care.","authors":"Stephen G Post, Julie Byrne","doi":"10.5915/43-3-9219","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.5915/43-3-9219","url":null,"abstract":"What does Islam have to offer health-care ethics that cannot be found elsewhere? I do not mean to suggest that there is only one answer to this question, because there are many. However, I will focus on the elevated status of the patient as the recipient of compassionate care. Today, the primary medical ethical issue is no longer a quandary such as “Should we withdraw artificial nutrition and hydration from a 90-year-old man with dementia?” Such questions are, of course, important. However, the primary issue is that the medical profession is losing its soul to technology and dehumanized care in which patients feel overbiologized and depersonalized, nothing more than “the kidney in room 5.” I ask you here today, in the name of Allah the merciful and compassionate, to be the ones who provide leadership in solving this crisis in medical care. Historians of medical ethics and bioethics rightly begin with Hippocratic ethics (400-300 BCE). We are familiar with the Hippocratic Oath and its influence. One finds in the ancient Greeks and Romans absolutely no passionate concern for the patient. There is no sense that the Hippocratic physician should go out of his way to help a needy patient. The spirit of Greco-Roman medical ethics is more or less casual with regard to the patient’s good. One has no image of the physician who goes out of his way or sacrifices ease in order to respond to the patient in need. In fact, for all its strengths, the Hippocratic ethos excludes from care slaves, poor people, and dying patients. Certainly the oath is clear in prohibiting the use of a deadly drug or abortifacient. It affirms confidentiality and “do no harm” and has many other strengths. But that passion for the patient in need, no matter how inconvenient, is simply not part of the ethos. The Hippocratic tradition is elitist, rather than devoted to patients in the spirit of equal regard. It really operates at the level of medicine as a career (careo) rather than anything deeper. There is no real call to serve. Then comes the great period of the Judeo, Christian, and Islamic traditions (est. 400 to 1750 CE). Here the physician is no longer casual but rather called by God to heal the sick regardless of their circumstances, degree of illness, or ability to pay. The Islamic Code of Medical Ethics of 1981, ratified by the First International Conference on Islamic Medicine and endorsed by many Islamic countries, vividly articulates this depth of calling to serve the needy. Article DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.5915/43-3-9219 Video DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.5915/43-3-9219V Compassionate Care Panel Discussion","PeriodicalId":89859,"journal":{"name":"The Journal of IMA","volume":"43 3","pages":"148-59"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2011-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/1e/59/jima-43-3-9219.PMC3516108.pdf","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"31379877","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Faroque Ahmed Khan, Gamal Badawi, Rabbi Jerome K Davidson, Frederick A Smith
This is the summary of the symposium proceedings held at Hofstra University focusing on Abrahamic faith teachings regarding Brain Death, Do Not Resuscitate, Patient Autonomy and the Escalating Health Care Costs. http://dx.doi.org/10.5915/43-3-8982 Video
{"title":"Monotheistic Faith Perspectives on Brain Death, DNR, Patient Autonomy and Health Care Costs.","authors":"Faroque Ahmed Khan, Gamal Badawi, Rabbi Jerome K Davidson, Frederick A Smith","doi":"10.5915/43-3-8982","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.5915/43-3-8982","url":null,"abstract":"This is the summary of the symposium proceedings held at Hofstra University focusing on Abrahamic faith teachings regarding Brain Death, Do Not Resuscitate, Patient Autonomy and the Escalating Health Care Costs. http://dx.doi.org/10.5915/43-3-8982 Video","PeriodicalId":89859,"journal":{"name":"The Journal of IMA","volume":"43 3","pages":"113-33"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2011-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/5b/04/jima-43-3-8982.PMC3516114.pdf","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"31379872","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Me em mb be er rs s a an nd d J JI IM MA A R Re ea ad de er rs s: : This issue of JIMA is devoted to the proceedings of IMANA/Hofstra Ethics conference held in Long Island, New York, September 17-18, 2010. I believe it covers a lot of information that is useful and interesting. This will be the last printed issue of JIMA. We will continue publishing JIMA online. You can read the articles on jima.imana.org as they are accepted and prepared. If you register on the web site, you will be notified by e-mail whenever new content is added. We are still working to publish all the back issues online. As you know, PubMed Central has agreed to accept JIMA's articles for its repository. Thus JIMA articles will show up when users of PubMed Central search for terms matching the terms associated with JIMA articles. To facilitate this process, IMANA has become a member of CrossRef, the agency that assigns Digital Object Identifiers (DOIs) to its mem-bers' electronic documents. JIMA contracted with Data Conversion Laboratories (DCL) to handle submission of its articles to the PubMed. All articles in JIMA should be easily accessible to readers all over the world who use internet. The articles would be easily and permanently identified and stored in digital form. JIMA's Twitter account is available at http://twitter.com/#!/jislammedassoc. People who prefer to receive updates via e-mail can subscribe to a weekly summary of JIMA's status updates on Twitter at http://paper.li/JIslamMedAssoc. JIMA's status updates include announcements of IMANA activities, published JIMA articles, and medical news of interest to IMANA's members and audience. This effort is done to expose IMANA and JIMA to a wider audience. Periodically, IMANA Headquarters should remind people to access these social media and share in their circles. The Journal of the Islamic Medical Association of North America (JIMA) has now acquired the most up-to-date technological status in the era of electronic publishing. I invite you all to submit your articles to be published in JIMA. W Wa as ss sa al la aa am m, , A As ss sa al la aa am mu u a al la ay yk ku um m
{"title":"Message from the editor.","authors":"Hossam E Fadel","doi":"10.5915/43-3-9833","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.5915/43-3-9833","url":null,"abstract":"Me em mb be er rs s a an nd d J JI IM MA A R Re ea ad de er rs s: : This issue of JIMA is devoted to the proceedings of IMANA/Hofstra Ethics conference held in Long Island, New York, September 17-18, 2010. I believe it covers a lot of information that is useful and interesting. This will be the last printed issue of JIMA. We will continue publishing JIMA online. You can read the articles on jima.imana.org as they are accepted and prepared. If you register on the web site, you will be notified by e-mail whenever new content is added. We are still working to publish all the back issues online. As you know, PubMed Central has agreed to accept JIMA's articles for its repository. Thus JIMA articles will show up when users of PubMed Central search for terms matching the terms associated with JIMA articles. To facilitate this process, IMANA has become a member of CrossRef, the agency that assigns Digital Object Identifiers (DOIs) to its mem-bers' electronic documents. JIMA contracted with Data Conversion Laboratories (DCL) to handle submission of its articles to the PubMed. All articles in JIMA should be easily accessible to readers all over the world who use internet. The articles would be easily and permanently identified and stored in digital form. JIMA's Twitter account is available at http://twitter.com/#!/jislammedassoc. People who prefer to receive updates via e-mail can subscribe to a weekly summary of JIMA's status updates on Twitter at http://paper.li/JIslamMedAssoc. JIMA's status updates include announcements of IMANA activities, published JIMA articles, and medical news of interest to IMANA's members and audience. This effort is done to expose IMANA and JIMA to a wider audience. Periodically, IMANA Headquarters should remind people to access these social media and share in their circles. The Journal of the Islamic Medical Association of North America (JIMA) has now acquired the most up-to-date technological status in the era of electronic publishing. I invite you all to submit your articles to be published in JIMA. W Wa as ss sa al la aa am m, , A As ss sa al la aa am mu u a al la ay yk ku um m","PeriodicalId":89859,"journal":{"name":"The Journal of IMA","volume":"43 3","pages":"109"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2011-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/54/91/jima-43-3-9833.PMC3516122.pdf","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"31379870","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
I will start my talk with an actual case. JW, 74, the father of a Catholic physician, who is also an ethicist in a Catholic hospital, suffered a massive stroke that left him paralyzed with receptive and expressive aphasia. His advance directive stated that he did not want mechanical ventilation, nutrition, or hydration if he were to end up in a terminal state. He is now paralyzed and has expressive aphasia, but he is not terminal. He is somewhat conscious. His caregivers decided to insert a g-tube and start feeding. When he lapsed into a coma after 150 days, it was decided to stop the feeding and allow him to die peacefully at home under hospice care. Both his wishes were fulfilled, and all care was provided. The patient should have access to information, and his privacy and right to exercise control on self should be respected. When we are talking about rights, whose rights are they? What are the rights of man? What are the rights of the Creator? There is also the question of the ownership of the body. Do we have ownership of our bodies when we are dead or just while we are living? Can my wife after my death inherit my organs? Probably not. You may have right to donate an organ, but Islamically, do you have the right to put in your will that you should be cremated? No. Do Muslims have the right to seek Shariah rulings in end-of-life issues? Do we have a right to put Shariah rulings in our advance directives and living wills in terms of autopsy or other matters? Yes, we do. What is forbidden in life is desecration of the human body. Unnecessary mutilation of the body is not permitted while we are alive, and it is not permitted after death, unless it is required by law or a medical issue has to be solved. What is the underlying moral value? We should all be protected by the constitution and law. If you do not have a living will, and your body is still alive but in a vegetative state, your body becomes the property of the state, and the state sometimes decides what can be done. A physician who pulls the tube out on his own can be charged with murder. The Society for the Right to Die, a Boston organization, published a very nice book, The Physician and the Hopelessly Ill Patient.1 That book outlines all the different states’ laws. I will describe the Indiana law later. Informed consent is better described as the shared mutual consent that the physician participates in the informative process and patient partakes in an intelligent discussion, discussing with both the family and his care provider. Patients have the right to refuse treatment, but they have to understand the consequences of the refusal. Yes, I refuse to have my two legs amputated because of gangrene but the gangrene and infection and sepsis will proceed if I refuse to do that. I probably will die. Sometimes the problem is not with the patient, but it is with us, the physicians. We do not sit down and communicate with the patient. We instead have the nurse give the consent forms to the p
{"title":"Advance directives and living wills for muslims.","authors":"Shahid Athar","doi":"10.5915/43-3-8478","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.5915/43-3-8478","url":null,"abstract":"I will start my talk with an actual case. JW, 74, the father of a Catholic physician, who is also an ethicist in a Catholic hospital, suffered a massive stroke that left him paralyzed with receptive and expressive aphasia. His advance directive stated that he did not want mechanical ventilation, nutrition, or hydration if he were to end up in a terminal state. He is now paralyzed and has expressive aphasia, but he is not terminal. He is somewhat conscious. His caregivers decided to insert a g-tube and start feeding. When he lapsed into a coma after 150 days, it was decided to stop the feeding and allow him to die peacefully at home under hospice care. Both his wishes were fulfilled, and all care was provided. The patient should have access to information, and his privacy and right to exercise control on self should be respected. When we are talking about rights, whose rights are they? What are the rights of man? What are the rights of the Creator? There is also the question of the ownership of the body. Do we have ownership of our bodies when we are dead or just while we are living? Can my wife after my death inherit my organs? Probably not. You may have right to donate an organ, but Islamically, do you have the right to put in your will that you should be cremated? No. Do Muslims have the right to seek Shariah rulings in end-of-life issues? Do we have a right to put Shariah rulings in our advance directives and living wills in terms of autopsy or other matters? Yes, we do. What is forbidden in life is desecration of the human body. Unnecessary mutilation of the body is not permitted while we are alive, and it is not permitted after death, unless it is required by law or a medical issue has to be solved. What is the underlying moral value? We should all be protected by the constitution and law. If you do not have a living will, and your body is still alive but in a vegetative state, your body becomes the property of the state, and the state sometimes decides what can be done. A physician who pulls the tube out on his own can be charged with murder. The Society for the Right to Die, a Boston organization, published a very nice book, The Physician and the Hopelessly Ill Patient.1 That book outlines all the different states’ laws. I will describe the Indiana law later. Informed consent is better described as the shared mutual consent that the physician participates in the informative process and patient partakes in an intelligent discussion, discussing with both the family and his care provider. Patients have the right to refuse treatment, but they have to understand the consequences of the refusal. Yes, I refuse to have my two legs amputated because of gangrene but the gangrene and infection and sepsis will proceed if I refuse to do that. I probably will die. Sometimes the problem is not with the patient, but it is with us, the physicians. We do not sit down and communicate with the patient. We instead have the nurse give the consent forms to the p","PeriodicalId":89859,"journal":{"name":"The Journal of IMA","volume":"43 3","pages":"144-6"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2011-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.5915/43-3-8478","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"31379875","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
This article depicts a chaplain's role in various learning and teaching situations, including end-of-life care and cases requiring cultural competency and gender preferences. The cases exemplify and underscore the difference between the role of a chaplain and the imam, as well as the necessity to have imams and both male and female chaplains in the hospital. It also describes the training, education, pastoral formation, pastoral identity, and roots of pastoral care in the Islamic tradition. The article explores the challenges of this new profession and advocates having a Muslim chaplain available in the hospital to serve Muslim patients, families, and the non-Muslim staff.
{"title":"End of Life Care and the Chaplain's Role on the Medical Team.","authors":"Mary Lahaj","doi":"10.5915/43-3-8392","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.5915/43-3-8392","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This article depicts a chaplain's role in various learning and teaching situations, including end-of-life care and cases requiring cultural competency and gender preferences. The cases exemplify and underscore the difference between the role of a chaplain and the imam, as well as the necessity to have imams and both male and female chaplains in the hospital. It also describes the training, education, pastoral formation, pastoral identity, and roots of pastoral care in the Islamic tradition. The article explores the challenges of this new profession and advocates having a Muslim chaplain available in the hospital to serve Muslim patients, families, and the non-Muslim staff.</p>","PeriodicalId":89859,"journal":{"name":"The Journal of IMA","volume":"43 3","pages":"173-8"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2011-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/ab/2e/jima-43-3-8392.PMC3516106.pdf","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"31379880","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Dealing with end-of-life issues in pediatric patients is difficult due to their young age, the complexities of situations leading to illness, and the multiple decision makers that exist in addition to parents and guardians. Pediatric patients do not have living wills addressing specific instructions for how long to continue life support systems such as a ventilator or a G-tube (gastrostomy tube for feeding). The dying pediatric patient also has typically not consented to organ donation either. The burden of decision making lies with the parents, guardians, and health-care providers of the dying child. This paper deals with these complexities and reflects the author's own experiences over nearly four decades of dealing with pediatric patients in her practice.
{"title":"End of life issues in pediatric patients.","authors":"Malika Haque","doi":"10.5915/43-8973","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.5915/43-8973","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Dealing with end-of-life issues in pediatric patients is difficult due to their young age, the complexities of situations leading to illness, and the multiple decision makers that exist in addition to parents and guardians. Pediatric patients do not have living wills addressing specific instructions for how long to continue life support systems such as a ventilator or a G-tube (gastrostomy tube for feeding). The dying pediatric patient also has typically not consented to organ donation either. The burden of decision making lies with the parents, guardians, and health-care providers of the dying child. This paper deals with these complexities and reflects the author's own experiences over nearly four decades of dealing with pediatric patients in her practice.</p>","PeriodicalId":89859,"journal":{"name":"The Journal of IMA","volume":"43 3","pages":"192-4"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2011-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/70/4b/jima-43-3-8973.PMC3516120.pdf","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"31378196","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
JIMA: Volume 43, 2011 Page 208 Pain management is a primary concern of both patients facing terminal illness and their loved ones. Pain itself is known to be both a universal and a very personal experience. Given the private nature of pain, the individual must express it in order to make it known. The expression of pain and its companion, suffering, are subjective and heavily influenced by one’s culture. The clinical and social manifestations of pain and suffering are varied as numerous anthropological studies have shown.1 Psychologist Lisa Stepp describes pain as follows:
{"title":"Pain management for the terminally ill: the role of race and religion.","authors":"Cheryl Mwaria","doi":"10.5915/43-3-9039","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.5915/43-3-9039","url":null,"abstract":"JIMA: Volume 43, 2011 Page 208 Pain management is a primary concern of both patients facing terminal illness and their loved ones. Pain itself is known to be both a universal and a very personal experience. Given the private nature of pain, the individual must express it in order to make it known. The expression of pain and its companion, suffering, are subjective and heavily influenced by one’s culture. The clinical and social manifestations of pain and suffering are varied as numerous anthropological studies have shown.1 Psychologist Lisa Stepp describes pain as follows:","PeriodicalId":89859,"journal":{"name":"The Journal of IMA","volume":"43 3","pages":"208-14"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2011-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/d0/06/jima-43-3-9039.PMC3516116.pdf","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"31378200","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}