Blood Pressure最新文献

Background: We conducted a comparative analysis of hypertension prevalence, progression, and treatment in two Finnish population-based cohorts comprising older adults born 20 years apart. The study covered data from pre- and post-HYVET Study eras and spanned the onset of the COVID-19 pandemic.

Methods: All 70-year-old home-dwelling citizens of Turku, in Southwest Finland, were invited to participate in the survey in 1990 (1920-born TUVA cohort) and in 2010 (1940-born UTUVA cohort) with a 25-year follow-up plan. The analyses included those with available data for systolic and diastolic blood pressure (BP), yielding 1015 TUVA and 888 UTUVA participants at baseline. Biomarkers associated with BP were analysed with t- and chi-square tests.

Results: At baseline, 83.4% of TUVA and 74.3% of UTUVA participants had uncontrolled BP, with respective antihypertensive medication usage at 36.0% and 55.9% (p < .001 for both between-cohort differences). Systolic BP exhibited an inverted U-shaped trajectory, with TUVA initially 7.8 mmHg higher at 155.4 mmHg than UTUVA (p < .001). However, by the ages 80-82, the difference in systolic BP trajectories between the cohorts was attenuated to 4.0 mmHg (p = .03). Diastolic BP differences were less clinically significant. UTUVA demonstrated higher use of all five conventional antihypertensive categories than TUVA (p ≤ .02 for all categories).

Conclusions: In the early years of older adulthood, the 1940-born cohort showed a positive trend in hypertension management, yet maintained a 74.3% baseline rate of uncontrolled BP. Furthermore, by the ages 81-82, the benefits observed over the 1920-born cohort had lessened, influenced by the COVID-19 pandemic or other lasting factors. Heightened efforts to improve hypertension treatment in older adults remain crucial in the post-HYVET era.

Background: Healthcare providers are faced with an increasing number of patients with obesity and arterial hypertension. Preventing obesity-associated hypertension and appropriately managing patients with established disease are both important. Hence, the aim of our study was to evaluate the clinical care of patients with obesity and hypertension among ESH Excellence Centres (ECs).

Methods: We conducted a cross-sectional, international 30-item survey through e-mails.

Results: In total, 70 representatives of ECs participated (78% men) with 66% of them practicing medicine for more than 30 years and working in well-equipped clinics. Most were internists (41%) and cardiologists (37%) and 73% reported training on the management of obese patients with hypertension. A majority weigh their patients (77%) and evaluate patients for sleep disorders (93%). However, only 47% spend more than 5min to advise for lifestyle modification in general, 59% for weight loss, 56% for salt intake and 64% for exercise. Finally, a minority of participants ask patients if they like their body (6%) or about previous attempts to lose weight (28%), evaluate 24h urinary sodium excretion rate (22%) and provide written (15%) or personalized (10%) dietary advices. If the patient suffers also from type 2 diabetes mellitus, 66% switch treatment to GLP1 receptor agonists and 60% to SGLT2 inhibitors.

Conclusion: Most clinicians in ESH ECs are well educated regarding obesity-associated hypertension, and clinics are sufficiently equipped to manage these patients, as well. However, several deficits were reported regarding efforts to address and implement obesity specific aspects and interventions to improve care in patients with obesity and hypertension.

Purpose: As reported in most European countries, the percentage of treated hypertensive patients achieving a well-controlled blood pressure (e.g. < 140/90 mmHg) is insufficient. This represents a major health concern particularly in countries with a high prevalence of cardiovascular events such as stroke. Therefore, there is a need to develop national programs to increase not only the awareness regarding elevated blood pressure but also the percentage of treated patients achieving recommended blood pressure targets. The present paper describes the new initiative of the Portuguese Society of Hypertension (PSH) to achieveat least 70% of controlled hypertensive patients, followed in primary care, in 2026.

Materials and methods: The strategies used to improve blood pressure control are aimed at healthcare professionals and general population and include governmental and organizational interventions. To be able to analyze the control rate of HTN patients, and using BI-CSP reports (the Primary Care health unit platform), every six months, we will be addressing the proportion of HTN patients (age: 18-65 years) with BP < 140/90 mmHg and the proportion of HTN patients with at least one blood pressure recorded in the last semester.

Conclusion: With Mission 70/26, the PHS aims to improve awareness among all health professionals and community alike about the problem of uncontrolled HTN and its role in the consequent disability and high mortality rate from cardiovascular causes.

Purpose: High blood pressure (HBP) is the leading cause of mortality and years of disability, and its prevalence is increasing. Therefore, diagnosis and effective treatment of HBP is one of the main goals to prevent and reduce its complications, and pharmacological treatment is the cornerstone of hypertension management.Materials and Methods: The gradual introduction of different drug families has led to the development of new molecules that have improved efficacy and reduced adverse effects. Results: Current drugs include a large number that target key mechanisms of blood pressure regulation as well as those that contribute to hypertension-induced organ damage. Recently, new antihypertensive drugs have been introduced that not only aim to lower blood pressure but also provide additional protection against organ damage and metabolic disorders. Some of them were introduced for specific indications other than hypertension and other are based in a pharmacogenomic approach. Other routes of administration, such subcutaneous injection, are also being explored to improve protection and compliance.Conclusions: The main characteristics of each class of antihypertensive drug are summarised.

Introduction: Von Hippel-Lindau disease (e.g. VHL) is an autosomal dominant multi-organ cancer syndrome caused by a mutation in the VHL tumour suppressor gene. In this study, we introduce a novel genetic variant found in 11 family members diagnosed initially with isolated Pheochromocytoma. Subsequent findings revealed its association with VHL syndrome and corresponds to the Type 2 C phenotype.

Methods: The VHL gene was amplified through the utilisation of the polymerase chain reaction (PCR). PCR fragments were sequenced using bidirectional Sanger sequencing, using BigDye™ Terminator v3.1 Cycle Sequencing Kit, running on the 3500 genetic analyser. Results were assembled and analysed Using Software SeqA and chromas pro.

Results: A heterozygous in-frame duplication of three nucleotides, specifically ATG, c.377_379dup; p.Asp126dup in exon 2, was identified in all the patients tested within the pedigree.

Conclusion: In this study, we disclose the identification of a novel genetic variant in a Jordanian family, affecting eleven family members with pheochromocytoma associated with VHL disease. This finding underscores the importance of screening family members and contemplating genetic testing for individuals newly diagnosed with pheochromocytoma and could enhance our comprehension of the potential adverse consequences associated with VHL germline mutations.

Purpose The Endocrine Society (ES) guidelines recommend screening for primary aldosteronism (PA) in high risk hypertensive patients presenting with at least one of seven criteria (resistant HTN, hypokalaemia, adrenal nodule, etc.) Although guidelines are clear and screening is simple, compliance rates among clinicians are extremely low. This results in underdiagnosis of early disease, leading to cadiovasculaer complications and the extra-burden of advanced chronic kidney disease. We aimed to evaluate the screening rates in our Nephrology and Hypertension clinics, as an example of a dedicated Hypertension Excellence Centre. Materials and methods Data on adult hypertensive patients was retrieved from January 2018 to December 2020. Included in the study were hypertensive patients who had at least one of the ES criteria for PA screening. Of all suitable patients, we compared those who were screened for PA to patients who were not screened. Univariate and multivariate cox regression analyses were used for comparison between groups. Results Of 661 patients with HTN, 218 patients (33%) met the ES guidelines for PA screening. Forty-six of them (21.1%) were referred for screening. Advanced age and male gender were associated with lower screening referral rates. Odds ratio for age was 0.945 for every year (95% CI 0.915 - 0.975). There was a trend towards decreased referral rate in advanced kidney disease. Conclusions A 21% screening rate, suggests that many cases of PA are likely missed, more often in older patients. We therefore advocate for PA screening of all hypertensive patients, especially elderly patients with CKD, in whom clinicians' awareness is low but the absolute risk is high.

Purpose: Visit-to-visit blood pressure variability is a strong predictor of the incidence of cardiovascular events and target organ damage due to hypertension. The present study investigated whether year-to-year blood pressure variability predicts the risk of hypertension in the Japanese general population.

Materials and methods: This study analysed 2806 normotensive individuals who participated in our physical check-up program for five years in a row from 2008 to 2013. The average, standard deviation, coefficient of variation, average real variability, and highest value of systolic blood pressure in the five consecutive visits were determined and used as baseline data. The participants were followed up for the next 6 years with the development of 'high blood pressure', an average blood pressure level of ≥140/90 mmHg or the use of antihypertensive medications, as the endpoint.

Result: During follow-up, 'high blood pressure' developed in 389 participants (13.9%, 29.5 per 1 000 person-years). The incidence increased across the quartiles of standard deviation and average real variability, while the average and highest systolic blood pressure had the most prominent impact on the development of 'high blood pressure'. Multivariate logistic regression analysis adjusted for possible risk factors indicated that the average, standard deviation, average real variability, and highest blood pressure, but not the coefficient of variation of systolic blood pressure, were significant predictors of 'high blood pressure'.

Conclusion: Increased year-to-year blood pressure variability predicts the risk of hypertension in the general normotensive population. The highest blood pressure in the preceding years may also be a strong predictor of the risk of hypertension.

Objective: The aim of this study was to describe and compare echocardiographic findings before renal sympathetic denervation (RDN) and 6 and 24 months after the procedure.

Materials and methods: Patients with treatment resistant hypertension (TRH) were included in this non-randomised intervention study. RDN was performed by a single experienced operator using the Symplicity Catheter System. Echocardiographic measurements were performed at baseline, and after 6 and 24 months.

Results: The cohort consisted of 21 patients with TRH, with a mean systolic office blood pressure (BP) of 163 mmHg and mean diastolic BP 109 mmHg. Mixed model analysis showed no significant change in left ventricular (LV) mass index (LVMI) or left atrium volume index (LAVI) after the RDN procedure. Higher LVMI at baseline was significantly associated with greater reduction in LVMI (p < 0.001). Relative wall thickness (RWT) increased over time (0.48 mm after two years) regardless of change in BP. There was a small but significant reduction in LV end-diastolic (LVIDd) and end-systolic (LVIDs) diameters after RDN, with a mean reduction of 2.6 and 2.4 mm, respectively, after two years. Progression to concentric hypertrophy was observed only in in patients who did not achieve normal BP values, despite BP reduction after RDN.

Conclusion: There was no reduction of LV mass after RDN. We found a small statistically significant reduction in LVIDd and LVIDs, which together with increase in RWT can indicate progression towards concentric hypertrophy. BP reduction after RDN on its own does not reverse concentric remodelling if target BP is not achieved.