Pub Date : 2026-01-01Epub Date: 2025-12-02DOI: 10.1007/s40259-025-00758-6
Luís Cláudio Lima de Jesus, Rhayane Cristina Viegas Santos, Vasco Azevedo
Mucositis significantly impairs patients' quality of life, and despite its clinical importance and the availability of symptomatic treatments, no gold-standard therapeutic protocol has been established. Recent advances in biotechnology and molecular biology have enabled the development of genetically engineered probiotic strains capable of producing or delivering therapeutic molecules directly to inflamed mucosal sites. Although several recombinant biotherapeutic bacteria have advanced to clinical evaluation, most have not yet reproduced the efficacy observed in preclinical models, and no products have yet been commercially approved for human use. This is the first review to comprehensively outline the recombinant molecules as an innovative biotherapeutic option for mucosal inflammation induced by chemoradiotherapy. In this review, we describe how genetically modified bacteria function as living drug delivery platforms, focusing on their ability to produce or deliver recombinant molecules, including antimicrobial peptides, antioxidant enzymes, growth factors, and interleukin receptor antagonists, for mucositis therapy. We further discuss key limitations, including biosafety, control of gene expression, and gut protection levels, while outlining future challenges.
{"title":"Recombinant Molecules as a New Frontier in Mucositis Therapy.","authors":"Luís Cláudio Lima de Jesus, Rhayane Cristina Viegas Santos, Vasco Azevedo","doi":"10.1007/s40259-025-00758-6","DOIUrl":"10.1007/s40259-025-00758-6","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Mucositis significantly impairs patients' quality of life, and despite its clinical importance and the availability of symptomatic treatments, no gold-standard therapeutic protocol has been established. Recent advances in biotechnology and molecular biology have enabled the development of genetically engineered probiotic strains capable of producing or delivering therapeutic molecules directly to inflamed mucosal sites. Although several recombinant biotherapeutic bacteria have advanced to clinical evaluation, most have not yet reproduced the efficacy observed in preclinical models, and no products have yet been commercially approved for human use. This is the first review to comprehensively outline the recombinant molecules as an innovative biotherapeutic option for mucosal inflammation induced by chemoradiotherapy. In this review, we describe how genetically modified bacteria function as living drug delivery platforms, focusing on their ability to produce or deliver recombinant molecules, including antimicrobial peptides, antioxidant enzymes, growth factors, and interleukin receptor antagonists, for mucositis therapy. We further discuss key limitations, including biosafety, control of gene expression, and gut protection levels, while outlining future challenges.</p>","PeriodicalId":9022,"journal":{"name":"BioDrugs","volume":" ","pages":"41-55"},"PeriodicalIF":6.9,"publicationDate":"2026-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145653285","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2026-01-01Epub Date: 2025-11-03DOI: 10.1007/s40259-025-00748-8
Monica Luque, Kristina Zhelyazkova, Laxmikant Vashishta, Masna Rai, Abid Sattar, Katarina Petrovic, Richard Bucknall, Steffen Leutz, Fausto Berti
<p><strong>Background: </strong>Golimumab is a safe and effective treatment for patients with rheumatoid arthritis. Biosimilars to the reference product (RP; Simponi<sup>®</sup>) may make treatment more accessible.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>The aim of this study was to assess the efficacy of AVT05, a golimumab biosimilar, and RP, each used in combination with methotrexate, in participants with moderate-to-severe rheumatoid arthritis.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This was a 52-week, randomized, double-blind, two-arm, parallel-group, active-controlled study. Participants were randomized 1:1 to receive AVT05 (n = 251) or RP (n = 251), 50 mg subcutaneously once every 4 weeks to Week 12 inclusive. Randomization was stratified by the baseline Disease Activity Score-28 for Rheumatoid Arthritis using C-Reactive Protein (DAS28-CRP) [≤ 5.1 and > 5.1]. The primary endpoint was the change from baseline in DAS28-CRP at Week 16. At Week 16, responder participants (DAS28-CRP decreased by > 0.6 from baseline and disease activity DAS28-CRP ≤ 5.1) initially enrolled in the AVT05 arm continued to receive AVT05 every 4 weeks. Responder participants initially randomized to RP were re-randomized 1:1 to either continue receiving RP or switch to AVT05. Non-responders were discontinued from the study drug. Change from baseline in DAS28-CRP response criteria at weeks 4, 8, 12, 24, 32, 40, 48, and 52 and percentage of subjects achieving American College of Rheumatology 20/50/70 at weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, and 52 were assessed as secondary endpoints. Safety and immunogenicity endpoints were also assessed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>At Week 16, the least squares mean (standard error) change from baseline in DAS28-CRP in AVT05 and RP was - 2.89 (0.058) and - 2.98 (0.058), respectively. The two-sided 95% confidence interval of the least squares mean difference (0.09; standard error 0.082) was entirely contained within the prespecified equivalence margin of - 0.6, 0.6 (- 0.07, 0.25), supporting a demonstration of comparative efficacy. Two sensitivity analyses (one [S1] without exclusion of any data because of intercurrent events, and one [S2] excluding data following intercurrent events or relevant protocol deviations) supported the robustness of the primary endpoint estimates (S1 95% confidence interval - 0.07, 0.25; S2 95% confidence interval - 0.07, 0.25). There were no notable differences in subgroup analyses. Secondary efficacy analyses were consistent with the primary endpoint, including in participants who switched treatments. Overall safety profiles showed no clinically meaningful differences between treatments, including in participants who switched treatments. Immunogenicity profiles were comparable between treatment arms at all timepoints, including in participants who switched treatments.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Analysis of the change in DAS28-CRP from baseline to Week 16 supported the assessment of comparative efficacy betwee
{"title":"Efficacy and Safety of Biosimilar AVT05 Versus Reference Product Golimumab in Combination with Methotrexate in Moderate-to-Severe Rheumatoid Arthritis: 52-Week Results of a Randomized, Parallel-Group, Double-Blind Study.","authors":"Monica Luque, Kristina Zhelyazkova, Laxmikant Vashishta, Masna Rai, Abid Sattar, Katarina Petrovic, Richard Bucknall, Steffen Leutz, Fausto Berti","doi":"10.1007/s40259-025-00748-8","DOIUrl":"10.1007/s40259-025-00748-8","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Golimumab is a safe and effective treatment for patients with rheumatoid arthritis. Biosimilars to the reference product (RP; Simponi<sup>®</sup>) may make treatment more accessible.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>The aim of this study was to assess the efficacy of AVT05, a golimumab biosimilar, and RP, each used in combination with methotrexate, in participants with moderate-to-severe rheumatoid arthritis.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This was a 52-week, randomized, double-blind, two-arm, parallel-group, active-controlled study. Participants were randomized 1:1 to receive AVT05 (n = 251) or RP (n = 251), 50 mg subcutaneously once every 4 weeks to Week 12 inclusive. Randomization was stratified by the baseline Disease Activity Score-28 for Rheumatoid Arthritis using C-Reactive Protein (DAS28-CRP) [≤ 5.1 and > 5.1]. The primary endpoint was the change from baseline in DAS28-CRP at Week 16. At Week 16, responder participants (DAS28-CRP decreased by > 0.6 from baseline and disease activity DAS28-CRP ≤ 5.1) initially enrolled in the AVT05 arm continued to receive AVT05 every 4 weeks. Responder participants initially randomized to RP were re-randomized 1:1 to either continue receiving RP or switch to AVT05. Non-responders were discontinued from the study drug. Change from baseline in DAS28-CRP response criteria at weeks 4, 8, 12, 24, 32, 40, 48, and 52 and percentage of subjects achieving American College of Rheumatology 20/50/70 at weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, and 52 were assessed as secondary endpoints. Safety and immunogenicity endpoints were also assessed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>At Week 16, the least squares mean (standard error) change from baseline in DAS28-CRP in AVT05 and RP was - 2.89 (0.058) and - 2.98 (0.058), respectively. The two-sided 95% confidence interval of the least squares mean difference (0.09; standard error 0.082) was entirely contained within the prespecified equivalence margin of - 0.6, 0.6 (- 0.07, 0.25), supporting a demonstration of comparative efficacy. Two sensitivity analyses (one [S1] without exclusion of any data because of intercurrent events, and one [S2] excluding data following intercurrent events or relevant protocol deviations) supported the robustness of the primary endpoint estimates (S1 95% confidence interval - 0.07, 0.25; S2 95% confidence interval - 0.07, 0.25). There were no notable differences in subgroup analyses. Secondary efficacy analyses were consistent with the primary endpoint, including in participants who switched treatments. Overall safety profiles showed no clinically meaningful differences between treatments, including in participants who switched treatments. Immunogenicity profiles were comparable between treatment arms at all timepoints, including in participants who switched treatments.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Analysis of the change in DAS28-CRP from baseline to Week 16 supported the assessment of comparative efficacy betwee","PeriodicalId":9022,"journal":{"name":"BioDrugs","volume":" ","pages":"135-149"},"PeriodicalIF":6.9,"publicationDate":"2026-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12790503/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145437062","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2026-01-01Epub Date: 2025-11-24DOI: 10.1007/s40259-025-00757-7
Martha C Faraguna, Daniël A M Lambregts, Ina Barzel, Ed H Jacobs, Marianne Hoogeveen-Westerveld, Nadine A M E van der Beek, W W M Pim Pijnappel, Serena Gasperini, Tim Preijers, Johanna M P van den Hout, Ans T van der Ploeg
We studied alpha-glucosidase activity in plasma and leukocytes after an infusion of 40 mg/kg of recombinant alglucosidase alpha in patients with classic infantile Pompe disease to assess the pharmacokinetics and identify potential surrogate efficacy markers of gene therapy in patients on enzyme replacement therapy. Samples were collected by pharmacokinetic curves (n = 5) and random samples (n = 21 patients). Alpha-glucosidase activity was measured in plasma (substrate 4-methylumbelliferyl-α-D-glucopyranoside, MU) and leukocytes (substrate glycogen, Gn, and MU). Plasma peak concentration occurred at the end of the infusion, reaching concentrations > 5000 and > 100,000 times higher than the control and untreated patient levels, with a median half-life of 3.1 h (1.3-4.2 h). In leukocytes, plasma peak concentration occurred 24 h after the start of enzyme replacement therapy; plasma peak concentration did not exceed the control level (0.7 [Gn] and 0.9 [MU] times higher than controls). The estimated half-life was 2-4 days. Seven days after enzyme replacement therapy, median enzyme activity was 1.3 times higher than the control levels in plasma and within the control range in leukocytes; after 14 days, median values in plasma and leukocytes were below the control level. These findings suggest alpha-glucosidase activity in plasma and leukocytes may serve as an efficacy marker for gene therapy studies in patients with classic infantile Pompe disease receiving enzyme replacement therapy. Similar studies with next-generation enzyme replacement therapy are advised.
{"title":"Can Alpha-Glucosidase Activity in Plasma or Leukocytes Serve as a Biomarker for Future Gene Therapy in Classic Infantile Pompe Disease?","authors":"Martha C Faraguna, Daniël A M Lambregts, Ina Barzel, Ed H Jacobs, Marianne Hoogeveen-Westerveld, Nadine A M E van der Beek, W W M Pim Pijnappel, Serena Gasperini, Tim Preijers, Johanna M P van den Hout, Ans T van der Ploeg","doi":"10.1007/s40259-025-00757-7","DOIUrl":"10.1007/s40259-025-00757-7","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>We studied alpha-glucosidase activity in plasma and leukocytes after an infusion of 40 mg/kg of recombinant alglucosidase alpha in patients with classic infantile Pompe disease to assess the pharmacokinetics and identify potential surrogate efficacy markers of gene therapy in patients on enzyme replacement therapy. Samples were collected by pharmacokinetic curves (n = 5) and random samples (n = 21 patients). Alpha-glucosidase activity was measured in plasma (substrate 4-methylumbelliferyl-α-D-glucopyranoside, MU) and leukocytes (substrate glycogen, Gn, and MU). Plasma peak concentration occurred at the end of the infusion, reaching concentrations > 5000 and > 100,000 times higher than the control and untreated patient levels, with a median half-life of 3.1 h (1.3-4.2 h). In leukocytes, plasma peak concentration occurred 24 h after the start of enzyme replacement therapy; plasma peak concentration did not exceed the control level (0.7 [Gn] and 0.9 [MU] times higher than controls). The estimated half-life was 2-4 days. Seven days after enzyme replacement therapy, median enzyme activity was 1.3 times higher than the control levels in plasma and within the control range in leukocytes; after 14 days, median values in plasma and leukocytes were below the control level. These findings suggest alpha-glucosidase activity in plasma and leukocytes may serve as an efficacy marker for gene therapy studies in patients with classic infantile Pompe disease receiving enzyme replacement therapy. Similar studies with next-generation enzyme replacement therapy are advised.</p>","PeriodicalId":9022,"journal":{"name":"BioDrugs","volume":" ","pages":"163-173"},"PeriodicalIF":6.9,"publicationDate":"2026-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12790504/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145585937","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2026-01-01Epub Date: 2025-12-15DOI: 10.1007/s40259-025-00759-5
Hariz Mohamad Salleh, Farid Nazer Faruqu, Ajantha Sinniah, Pooi-Fong Wong
Nanocarriers (NCs) are nanosized delivery systems that can be engineered from lipids, polymers, inorganic compounds, viral structural proteins and extracellular vesicles to transport cargo efficiently. Their unique characteristics, including biocompatibility, a modifiable surface for targeted delivery, increased uptake and sustained release of antigens, make them an ideal platform for vaccine development. NCs can also improve antigen stability, increase retention and act as adjuvants to enhance immune responses. Nanovaccines offer promising solutions to overcome the issues of conventional vaccine design in terms of efficacy, time and resource consumption. However, challenges in developing nanovaccines, such as a limited understanding of NC mechanisms of action, upscaling, safety and regulatory issues, need to be addressed to advance NCs into licensed vaccines. This review describes the types, advantages, limitations and clinical applications of NCs, with updates on nanovaccine candidates for infectious diseases and cancer in clinical trials, along with key lessons learnt. The development of nanovaccines that are protective against multiple pathogenic strains or for prophylactic treatment for cancer could potentially enhance global capacity in pandemic preparedness and disease prevention. Hence, continued research to advance NC technologies and to gain a deeper understanding of their mechanisms of immune activation is warranted to pave the way for more effective, personalized and accessible vaccines.
{"title":"Harnessing Nanocarriers to Advance Vaccine Development.","authors":"Hariz Mohamad Salleh, Farid Nazer Faruqu, Ajantha Sinniah, Pooi-Fong Wong","doi":"10.1007/s40259-025-00759-5","DOIUrl":"10.1007/s40259-025-00759-5","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Nanocarriers (NCs) are nanosized delivery systems that can be engineered from lipids, polymers, inorganic compounds, viral structural proteins and extracellular vesicles to transport cargo efficiently. Their unique characteristics, including biocompatibility, a modifiable surface for targeted delivery, increased uptake and sustained release of antigens, make them an ideal platform for vaccine development. NCs can also improve antigen stability, increase retention and act as adjuvants to enhance immune responses. Nanovaccines offer promising solutions to overcome the issues of conventional vaccine design in terms of efficacy, time and resource consumption. However, challenges in developing nanovaccines, such as a limited understanding of NC mechanisms of action, upscaling, safety and regulatory issues, need to be addressed to advance NCs into licensed vaccines. This review describes the types, advantages, limitations and clinical applications of NCs, with updates on nanovaccine candidates for infectious diseases and cancer in clinical trials, along with key lessons learnt. The development of nanovaccines that are protective against multiple pathogenic strains or for prophylactic treatment for cancer could potentially enhance global capacity in pandemic preparedness and disease prevention. Hence, continued research to advance NC technologies and to gain a deeper understanding of their mechanisms of immune activation is warranted to pave the way for more effective, personalized and accessible vaccines.</p>","PeriodicalId":9022,"journal":{"name":"BioDrugs","volume":" ","pages":"57-78"},"PeriodicalIF":6.9,"publicationDate":"2026-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145755033","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Even though the use of biosimilar medicines is increasing across European countries, detailed and regularly published official data on biosimilar uptake are not publicly available except in Italy and Portugal. The main objective of this study was to provide a nationwide assessment of biosimilar consumption and uptake patterns in Spain between 2016 and 2023. Data were provided by the Ministry of Health and included the defined daily dose (DDD) of biosimilars (N = 17) dispensed through both community pharmacies and public hospitals, biosimilar market share, and information on the registration status of both the bio-originator and biosimilars of each active principle. Data were analysed using non-parametric tests and bootstrap analysis with 10,000 replications, considering market share, time since market entry, number of competitors, and indication type (acute vs. chronic). The results show that biosimilar penetration increased from 9% in 2016 to 47% in 2023. In 2023, the biosimilar market share was substantially higher in the hospital setting (68%) compared to community pharmacies (34%). Biosimilars indicated for acute conditions achieved significantly higher market shares than those used for chronic conditions (p < 0.05). A positive correlation was observed between market share and the number of competitors, which was statistically significant only in the hospital setting (p = 0.007), while no significant association was found in the community pharmacy setting. Additionally, no correlation was identified between biosimilar market penetration and the time elapsed since the introduction of the first biosimilar. Other factors, such as prices, tendering, interchangeability, patients' characteristics, etc., may also influence biosimilar use. We suggest further analysis of policies aimed at promoting biosimilar adoption in Spain.
{"title":"Biosimilar Uptake in Spain from 2016 to 2023: Analysis Based on Official Data Collection.","authors":"Jaime Espin, Zuzana Špacírová, Leticia García-Mochón","doi":"10.1007/s40259-025-00747-9","DOIUrl":"10.1007/s40259-025-00747-9","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Even though the use of biosimilar medicines is increasing across European countries, detailed and regularly published official data on biosimilar uptake are not publicly available except in Italy and Portugal. The main objective of this study was to provide a nationwide assessment of biosimilar consumption and uptake patterns in Spain between 2016 and 2023. Data were provided by the Ministry of Health and included the defined daily dose (DDD) of biosimilars (N = 17) dispensed through both community pharmacies and public hospitals, biosimilar market share, and information on the registration status of both the bio-originator and biosimilars of each active principle. Data were analysed using non-parametric tests and bootstrap analysis with 10,000 replications, considering market share, time since market entry, number of competitors, and indication type (acute vs. chronic). The results show that biosimilar penetration increased from 9% in 2016 to 47% in 2023. In 2023, the biosimilar market share was substantially higher in the hospital setting (68%) compared to community pharmacies (34%). Biosimilars indicated for acute conditions achieved significantly higher market shares than those used for chronic conditions (p < 0.05). A positive correlation was observed between market share and the number of competitors, which was statistically significant only in the hospital setting (p = 0.007), while no significant association was found in the community pharmacy setting. Additionally, no correlation was identified between biosimilar market penetration and the time elapsed since the introduction of the first biosimilar. Other factors, such as prices, tendering, interchangeability, patients' characteristics, etc., may also influence biosimilar use. We suggest further analysis of policies aimed at promoting biosimilar adoption in Spain.</p>","PeriodicalId":9022,"journal":{"name":"BioDrugs","volume":" ","pages":"109-119"},"PeriodicalIF":6.9,"publicationDate":"2026-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145562538","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2026-01-01DOI: 10.1007/s40259-025-00760-y
Martha C Faraguna, Daniël A M Lambregts, Ina Barzel, Ed H Jacobs, Marianne Hoogeveen-Westerveld, Nadine A M E van der Beek, W W M Pim Pijnappel, Serena Gasperini, Tim Preijers, Johanna M P van den Hout, Ans T van der Ploeg
{"title":"Correction: Can Alpha-Glucosidase Activity in Plasma or Leukocytes Serve as a Biomarker for Future Gene Therapy in Classic Infantile Pompe Disease?","authors":"Martha C Faraguna, Daniël A M Lambregts, Ina Barzel, Ed H Jacobs, Marianne Hoogeveen-Westerveld, Nadine A M E van der Beek, W W M Pim Pijnappel, Serena Gasperini, Tim Preijers, Johanna M P van den Hout, Ans T van der Ploeg","doi":"10.1007/s40259-025-00760-y","DOIUrl":"10.1007/s40259-025-00760-y","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":9022,"journal":{"name":"BioDrugs","volume":" ","pages":"175"},"PeriodicalIF":6.9,"publicationDate":"2026-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12790531/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145755030","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-11-01Epub Date: 2025-10-01DOI: 10.1007/s40259-025-00745-x
Marco Sousa, Ana Luísa João, Martim Luz, Pedro Mendes-Bastos, Ângela Roda, Luiz Leite, Joana Valério, Ana Ferreirinha, Bárbara Leal, Maria João Paiva Lopes, Rita Pimenta, Paulo Ferreira, Tiago Torres
{"title":"Risankizumab in Patients with Psoriasis with Current or Previous Malignancy: A Multicenter, Retrospective Real-World Study.","authors":"Marco Sousa, Ana Luísa João, Martim Luz, Pedro Mendes-Bastos, Ângela Roda, Luiz Leite, Joana Valério, Ana Ferreirinha, Bárbara Leal, Maria João Paiva Lopes, Rita Pimenta, Paulo Ferreira, Tiago Torres","doi":"10.1007/s40259-025-00745-x","DOIUrl":"10.1007/s40259-025-00745-x","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":9022,"journal":{"name":"BioDrugs","volume":" ","pages":"923-926"},"PeriodicalIF":6.9,"publicationDate":"2025-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145198009","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-11-01Epub Date: 2025-09-23DOI: 10.1007/s40259-025-00741-1
Silvia Susin-Calle, Elvira Munteis, Pablo Villoslada, Jose E Martinez-Rodriguez
Multiple sclerosis (MS) is a chronic autoimmune disease of the central nervous system characterized by inflammation, demyelination, and neurodegeneration. Advances in understanding MS immunopathogenesis have led to the development of monoclonal antibodies (MABs) that target key immune pathways, providing highly selective and effective treatment options. Approved MABs, including those against CD20, CD25, CD52, and α4‑integrin, have demonstrated robust efficacy in reducing relapse rates, suppressing MRI activity, and, to some extent, slowing disability progression. Meanwhile, emerging agents aim to modulate neuroinflammation, promote remyelination, and improve safety profiles. This review summarizes the mechanisms of action, clinical efficacy, safety, and future perspectives of MAB therapies in MS, highlighting lessons from discontinued agents and opportunities for next‑generation therapeutics.
{"title":"The Present and Future of Monoclonal Antibody Therapies for Multiple Sclerosis.","authors":"Silvia Susin-Calle, Elvira Munteis, Pablo Villoslada, Jose E Martinez-Rodriguez","doi":"10.1007/s40259-025-00741-1","DOIUrl":"10.1007/s40259-025-00741-1","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Multiple sclerosis (MS) is a chronic autoimmune disease of the central nervous system characterized by inflammation, demyelination, and neurodegeneration. Advances in understanding MS immunopathogenesis have led to the development of monoclonal antibodies (MABs) that target key immune pathways, providing highly selective and effective treatment options. Approved MABs, including those against CD20, CD25, CD52, and α4‑integrin, have demonstrated robust efficacy in reducing relapse rates, suppressing MRI activity, and, to some extent, slowing disability progression. Meanwhile, emerging agents aim to modulate neuroinflammation, promote remyelination, and improve safety profiles. This review summarizes the mechanisms of action, clinical efficacy, safety, and future perspectives of MAB therapies in MS, highlighting lessons from discontinued agents and opportunities for next‑generation therapeutics.</p>","PeriodicalId":9022,"journal":{"name":"BioDrugs","volume":" ","pages":"815-826"},"PeriodicalIF":6.9,"publicationDate":"2025-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145124080","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-11-01Epub Date: 2025-10-04DOI: 10.1007/s40259-025-00744-y
Benjamin Mappin-Kasirer, Ian D Pavord
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), a leading cause of global morbidity and mortality, is a complex and heterogeneous respiratory condition characterised by incompletely reversible airflow obstruction on spirometry. The aetiologies and pathological patterns of COPD are varied, which has long been viewed as a hindrance to targeted treatment. Yet inflammation is central to the diverse mechanisms of COPD pathogenesis, and type 2 inflammation has emerged as a measurable, modifiable and clinically meaningful therapeutic target in those patients in whom it is identified. The approval of first biological therapy against type 2 inflammation in COPD builds on our understanding of immunological mechanisms in airways diseases, is informed by a decade of randomised trials and makes possible a fundamental shift in our approach to this common condition. This review will (1) assess aspects of pathological inflammation in COPD, namely type 1, 2 and 3 inflammation, and the role of epithelial alarmins; (2) examine data from randomised trials on the efficacy and safety of monoclonal antibodies against inflammatory mediators in COPD; and (3) discuss future directions for biological therapies in COPD, including new patient populations, new agents and new approaches that focus on high-risk disease and open the door to prevention.
{"title":"Biological Therapies in Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease: New Directions in Personalised Respiratory Medicine.","authors":"Benjamin Mappin-Kasirer, Ian D Pavord","doi":"10.1007/s40259-025-00744-y","DOIUrl":"10.1007/s40259-025-00744-y","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), a leading cause of global morbidity and mortality, is a complex and heterogeneous respiratory condition characterised by incompletely reversible airflow obstruction on spirometry. The aetiologies and pathological patterns of COPD are varied, which has long been viewed as a hindrance to targeted treatment. Yet inflammation is central to the diverse mechanisms of COPD pathogenesis, and type 2 inflammation has emerged as a measurable, modifiable and clinically meaningful therapeutic target in those patients in whom it is identified. The approval of first biological therapy against type 2 inflammation in COPD builds on our understanding of immunological mechanisms in airways diseases, is informed by a decade of randomised trials and makes possible a fundamental shift in our approach to this common condition. This review will (1) assess aspects of pathological inflammation in COPD, namely type 1, 2 and 3 inflammation, and the role of epithelial alarmins; (2) examine data from randomised trials on the efficacy and safety of monoclonal antibodies against inflammatory mediators in COPD; and (3) discuss future directions for biological therapies in COPD, including new patient populations, new agents and new approaches that focus on high-risk disease and open the door to prevention.</p>","PeriodicalId":9022,"journal":{"name":"BioDrugs","volume":" ","pages":"827-839"},"PeriodicalIF":6.9,"publicationDate":"2025-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145228388","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-11-01Epub Date: 2025-09-24DOI: 10.1007/s40259-025-00743-z
Courtney Chen, Jennifer Cillis, Supriya Deshpande, Anthony K Park, Hannah Valencia, Sang In Kim, Jianming Lu, Yoya Vashi, Annie Yang, Zhifang Zhang, Yanghee Woo, Yuman Fong, Shyambabu Chaurasiya
Oncolytic viruses (OVs) are naturally occurring or genetically modified viruses that selectively target cancer cells for infection, replication, and lysis. Specifically, their tumor tropism and promising antitumoral efficacy through direct oncolysis and indirect immunogenic activation make OVs a novel immunotherapeutic class of high interest. OVs find particular relevance in solid tumors that are notoriously refractory to chemoradiation, are immunologically silent, express heterogeneous antigens, and are difficult to penetrate with existing agents. Distinct OVs have been identified; many have been extensively studied and have been approved or are pending approval in humans, including adenoviruses, herpes simplex viruses, reoviruses, vaccinia viruses, and measles viruses. While each virus type is unique in size, structure, targeting, replication, and behavior, they broadly share several antitumor mechanisms-direct oncolysis, immunogenic cell death, and modification of the tumor microenvironment. Modifications to OVs build on these features, ranging from genetic manipulation to insertion of cytokines or genes of interest, such as checkpoint inhibitors, altering virulence for tumor specificity or safety, to viral targeting enhancements. Moreover, the most recent iterations of OVs are often paired as combination therapies with chemotherapy, radiation, or other immunotherapeutic agents. This review aims to provide an up-to-date, in-depth discussion of major OVs, their precise mechanisms of action, modifications for improved therapeutic outcomes, and current combination therapy approaches against solid tumors in pre-clinical and clinical settings.
{"title":"Oncolytic Virotherapy in Solid Tumors: A Current Review.","authors":"Courtney Chen, Jennifer Cillis, Supriya Deshpande, Anthony K Park, Hannah Valencia, Sang In Kim, Jianming Lu, Yoya Vashi, Annie Yang, Zhifang Zhang, Yanghee Woo, Yuman Fong, Shyambabu Chaurasiya","doi":"10.1007/s40259-025-00743-z","DOIUrl":"10.1007/s40259-025-00743-z","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Oncolytic viruses (OVs) are naturally occurring or genetically modified viruses that selectively target cancer cells for infection, replication, and lysis. Specifically, their tumor tropism and promising antitumoral efficacy through direct oncolysis and indirect immunogenic activation make OVs a novel immunotherapeutic class of high interest. OVs find particular relevance in solid tumors that are notoriously refractory to chemoradiation, are immunologically silent, express heterogeneous antigens, and are difficult to penetrate with existing agents. Distinct OVs have been identified; many have been extensively studied and have been approved or are pending approval in humans, including adenoviruses, herpes simplex viruses, reoviruses, vaccinia viruses, and measles viruses. While each virus type is unique in size, structure, targeting, replication, and behavior, they broadly share several antitumor mechanisms-direct oncolysis, immunogenic cell death, and modification of the tumor microenvironment. Modifications to OVs build on these features, ranging from genetic manipulation to insertion of cytokines or genes of interest, such as checkpoint inhibitors, altering virulence for tumor specificity or safety, to viral targeting enhancements. Moreover, the most recent iterations of OVs are often paired as combination therapies with chemotherapy, radiation, or other immunotherapeutic agents. This review aims to provide an up-to-date, in-depth discussion of major OVs, their precise mechanisms of action, modifications for improved therapeutic outcomes, and current combination therapy approaches against solid tumors in pre-clinical and clinical settings.</p>","PeriodicalId":9022,"journal":{"name":"BioDrugs","volume":" ","pages":"857-876"},"PeriodicalIF":6.9,"publicationDate":"2025-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12568882/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145136295","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}