Pub Date : 2024-09-18DOI: 10.1007/s40259-024-00680-3
Benjamin Stump, Aaron B. Waxman
Pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH) is a rare and progressive disease that continues to remain highly morbid despite multiple advances in medical therapies. There remains a persistent and desperate need to identify novel methods of treating and, ideally, reversing the pathologic vasculopathy that results in PAH development and progression. Sotatercept is a first-in-class fusion protein that is believed to primarily inhibit activin signaling resulting in decreased cell proliferation and differentiation, though the exact mechanism remains uncertain. Here, we review the currently available PAH therapies, data highlighting the importance of transforming growth factor-β (TGF-β) superfamily signaling in the development of PAH, and the published and on-going clinical trials evaluating sotatercept in the treatment of PAH. We will also discuss preclinical data supporting the potential use of the fusion protein KER-012 in the inhibition of aberrant TGF-β superfamily signaling to ameliorate the obstructive vasculopathy of PAH.
{"title":"Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension and TGF-β Superfamily Signaling: Focus on Sotatercept","authors":"Benjamin Stump, Aaron B. Waxman","doi":"10.1007/s40259-024-00680-3","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s40259-024-00680-3","url":null,"abstract":"<p>Pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH) is a rare and progressive disease that continues to remain highly morbid despite multiple advances in medical therapies. There remains a persistent and desperate need to identify novel methods of treating and, ideally, reversing the pathologic vasculopathy that results in PAH development and progression. Sotatercept is a first-in-class fusion protein that is believed to primarily inhibit activin signaling resulting in decreased cell proliferation and differentiation, though the exact mechanism remains uncertain. Here, we review the currently available PAH therapies, data highlighting the importance of transforming growth factor-β (TGF-β) superfamily signaling in the development of PAH, and the published and on-going clinical trials evaluating sotatercept in the treatment of PAH. We will also discuss preclinical data supporting the potential use of the fusion protein KER-012 in the inhibition of aberrant TGF-β superfamily signaling to ameliorate the obstructive vasculopathy of PAH.</p>","PeriodicalId":9022,"journal":{"name":"BioDrugs","volume":"27 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":6.8,"publicationDate":"2024-09-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142262711","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-09-18DOI: 10.1007/s40259-024-00677-y
Whitney C. Weber, Daniel N. Streblow, Lark L. Coffey
Chikungunya virus is an emerging mosquito-borne alphavirus that causes febrile illness and arthritic disease. Chikungunya virus is endemic in 110 countries and the World Health Organization estimates that it has caused more than 2 million cases of crippling acute and chronic arthritis globally since it re-emerged in 2005. Chikungunya virus outbreaks have occurred in Africa, Asia, Indian Ocean islands, South Pacific islands, Europe, and the Americas. Until recently, no specific countermeasures to prevent or treat chikungunya disease were available. To address this need, multiple vaccines are in human trials. These vaccines use messenger RNA-lipid nanoparticles, inactivated virus, and viral vector approaches, with a live-attenuated vaccine VLA1553 and a virus-like particle PXVX0317 in phase III testing. In November 2023, the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approved the VLA1553 live-attenuated vaccine, which is marketed as IXCHIQ. In June 2024, Health Canada approved IXCHIQ, and in July 2024, IXCHIQ was approved by the European Commission. On August 13, 2024, the US FDA granted priority review for PXVX0317. The European Medicine Agency is considering accelerated assessment review of PXVX0317, with potential for approval by both agencies in 2025. In this review, we summarize published data from pre-clinical and clinical trials for the IXCHIQ and PXVX0317 vaccines. We also discuss unanswered questions including potential impacts of pre-existing chikungunya virus immunity on vaccine safety and immunogenicity, whether long-term immunity can be achieved, safety in children, pregnant, and immunocompromised individuals, and vaccine efficacy in people with previous exposure to other emerging alphaviruses in addition to chikungunya virus.
{"title":"Chikungunya Virus Vaccines: A Review of IXCHIQ and PXVX0317 from Pre-Clinical Evaluation to Licensure","authors":"Whitney C. Weber, Daniel N. Streblow, Lark L. Coffey","doi":"10.1007/s40259-024-00677-y","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s40259-024-00677-y","url":null,"abstract":"<p>Chikungunya virus is an emerging mosquito-borne alphavirus that causes febrile illness and arthritic disease. Chikungunya virus is endemic in 110 countries and the World Health Organization estimates that it has caused more than 2 million cases of crippling acute and chronic arthritis globally since it re-emerged in 2005. Chikungunya virus outbreaks have occurred in Africa, Asia, Indian Ocean islands, South Pacific islands, Europe, and the Americas. Until recently, no specific countermeasures to prevent or treat chikungunya disease were available. To address this need, multiple vaccines are in human trials. These vaccines use messenger RNA-lipid nanoparticles, inactivated virus, and viral vector approaches, with a live-attenuated vaccine VLA1553 and a virus-like particle PXVX0317 in phase III testing. In November 2023, the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approved the VLA1553 live-attenuated vaccine, which is marketed as IXCHIQ. In June 2024, Health Canada approved IXCHIQ, and in July 2024, IXCHIQ was approved by the European Commission. On August 13, 2024, the US FDA granted priority review for PXVX0317. The European Medicine Agency is considering accelerated assessment review of PXVX0317, with potential for approval by both agencies in 2025. In this review, we summarize published data from pre-clinical and clinical trials for the IXCHIQ and PXVX0317 vaccines. We also discuss unanswered questions including potential impacts of pre-existing chikungunya virus immunity on vaccine safety and immunogenicity, whether long-term immunity can be achieved, safety in children, pregnant, and immunocompromised individuals, and vaccine efficacy in people with previous exposure to other emerging alphaviruses in addition to chikungunya virus.</p>","PeriodicalId":9022,"journal":{"name":"BioDrugs","volume":"30 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":6.8,"publicationDate":"2024-09-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142262712","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Background: Stapokibart/CM310, a humanized monoclonal antibody targeting the interleukin-4 receptor α chain, has shown promising treatment benefits in patients with moderate-to-severe atopic dermatitis in previous phase II clinical trials.
Objective: We aimed to evaluate the long-term efficacy and safety of stapokibart in adults with moderate-to-severe atopic dermatitis.
Methods: Enrolled patients who previously completed parent trials of stapokibart received a subcutaneous stapokibart 600-mg loading dose, then 300 mg every 2 weeks up to 52 weeks. Efficacy outcomes included the proportions of patients with ≥ 50%/75%/90% improvements from baseline of parent trials in the Eczema Area and Severity Index, Investigator's Global Assessment, and weekly average of the daily Peak Pruritus Numerical Rating Scale.
Results: In total, 127 patients were enrolled, and 110 (86.6%) completed the study. At week 52, the Eczema Area and Severity Index-50/75/90 response rates were 96.3%, 87.9%, and 71.0%, respectively. An Investigator's Global Assessment 0/1 with a ≥ 2-point reduction was achieved in 39.3% of patients at week 16, increasing to 58.9% at week 52. The proportions of patients with ≥ 3-point and ≥ 4-point reductions in the weekly average of daily Peak Pruritus Numerical Rating Scale scores were 80.2% and 62.2%, respectively, at week 52. Improvement in patients' quality of life was sustained over a 52-week treatment period. Treatment-emergent adverse events occurred in 88.2% of patients, with an exposure-adjusted event rate of 299.2 events/100 patient-years. Coronavirus disease 2019, upper respiratory tract infection, and conjunctivitis were the most common treatment-emergent adverse events.
Conclusions: Long-term treatment with stapokibart for 52 weeks showed high efficacy and good safety profiles, supporting its use as a continuous long-term treatment option for atopic dermatitis.
Clinical trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT04893707 (15 May, 2021).
{"title":"Long-Term Efficacy and Safety of Stapokibart in Adults with Moderate-to-Severe Atopic Dermatitis: An Open-Label Extension, Nonrandomized Clinical Trial.","authors":"Yan Zhao, Jing-Yi Li, Bin Yang, Yang-Feng Ding, Li-Ming Wu, Li-Tao Zhang, Jin-Yan Wang, Qian-Jin Lu, Chun-Lei Zhang, Fu-Ren Zhang, Xiao-Hong Zhu, Yu-Mei Li, Xiao-Hua Tao, Qing-Chun Diao, Lin-Feng Li, Jian-Yun Lu, Xiao-Yong Man, Fu-Qiu Li, Xiu-Juan Xia, Jiao-Ran Song, Ying-Min Jia, Li-Bo Zhang, Bo Chen, Jian-Zhong Zhang","doi":"10.1007/s40259-024-00668-z","DOIUrl":"10.1007/s40259-024-00668-z","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Stapokibart/CM310, a humanized monoclonal antibody targeting the interleukin-4 receptor α chain, has shown promising treatment benefits in patients with moderate-to-severe atopic dermatitis in previous phase II clinical trials.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>We aimed to evaluate the long-term efficacy and safety of stapokibart in adults with moderate-to-severe atopic dermatitis.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Enrolled patients who previously completed parent trials of stapokibart received a subcutaneous stapokibart 600-mg loading dose, then 300 mg every 2 weeks up to 52 weeks. Efficacy outcomes included the proportions of patients with ≥ 50%/75%/90% improvements from baseline of parent trials in the Eczema Area and Severity Index, Investigator's Global Assessment, and weekly average of the daily Peak Pruritus Numerical Rating Scale.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In total, 127 patients were enrolled, and 110 (86.6%) completed the study. At week 52, the Eczema Area and Severity Index-50/75/90 response rates were 96.3%, 87.9%, and 71.0%, respectively. An Investigator's Global Assessment 0/1 with a ≥ 2-point reduction was achieved in 39.3% of patients at week 16, increasing to 58.9% at week 52. The proportions of patients with ≥ 3-point and ≥ 4-point reductions in the weekly average of daily Peak Pruritus Numerical Rating Scale scores were 80.2% and 62.2%, respectively, at week 52. Improvement in patients' quality of life was sustained over a 52-week treatment period. Treatment-emergent adverse events occurred in 88.2% of patients, with an exposure-adjusted event rate of 299.2 events/100 patient-years. Coronavirus disease 2019, upper respiratory tract infection, and conjunctivitis were the most common treatment-emergent adverse events.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Long-term treatment with stapokibart for 52 weeks showed high efficacy and good safety profiles, supporting its use as a continuous long-term treatment option for atopic dermatitis.</p><p><strong>Clinical trial registration: </strong>ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT04893707 (15 May, 2021).</p>","PeriodicalId":9022,"journal":{"name":"BioDrugs","volume":" ","pages":"681-689"},"PeriodicalIF":5.4,"publicationDate":"2024-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141854701","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-09-01Epub Date: 2024-07-30DOI: 10.1007/s40259-024-00669-y
Anne Holtermann, Mila Gislon, Martin Angele, Marion Subklewe, Michael von Bergwelt-Baildon, Kirsten Lauber, Sebastian Kobold
Chimeric antigen receptor T cell therapy has been established in the treatment of various B cell malignancies. However, translating this therapeutic effect to treat solid tumors has been challenging because of their inter-tumoral as well as intratumoral heterogeneity and immunosuppressive microenvironment. Local interventions, such as surgery, radiotherapy, local ablation, and locoregional drug delivery, can enhance chimeric antigen receptor T cell therapy in solid tumors by improving tumor infiltration and reducing systemic toxicities. Additionally, ablation and radiotherapy have proven to (re-)activate systemic immune responses via abscopal effects and reprogram the tumor microenvironment on a physical, cellular, and chemical level. This review highlights the potential synergy of the combined approaches to overcome barriers of chimeric antigen receptor T cell therapy and summarizes recent studies that may pave the way for new treatment regimens.
嵌合抗原受体 T 细胞疗法已用于治疗各种 B 细胞恶性肿瘤。然而,由于实体瘤的瘤间和瘤内异质性以及免疫抑制微环境,将这种治疗效果用于治疗实体瘤一直是一项挑战。手术、放疗、局部消融和局部给药等局部干预措施可以通过改善肿瘤浸润和减少全身毒性来加强嵌合抗原受体T细胞治疗实体瘤的效果。此外,消融和放疗已被证明可通过脱落效应(重新)激活全身免疫反应,并在物理、细胞和化学水平上重新规划肿瘤微环境。本综述强调了联合疗法在克服嵌合抗原受体T细胞疗法障碍方面的潜在协同作用,并总结了可能为新治疗方案铺平道路的最新研究。
{"title":"Prospects of Synergy: Local Interventions and CAR T Cell Therapy in Solid Tumors.","authors":"Anne Holtermann, Mila Gislon, Martin Angele, Marion Subklewe, Michael von Bergwelt-Baildon, Kirsten Lauber, Sebastian Kobold","doi":"10.1007/s40259-024-00669-y","DOIUrl":"10.1007/s40259-024-00669-y","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Chimeric antigen receptor T cell therapy has been established in the treatment of various B cell malignancies. However, translating this therapeutic effect to treat solid tumors has been challenging because of their inter-tumoral as well as intratumoral heterogeneity and immunosuppressive microenvironment. Local interventions, such as surgery, radiotherapy, local ablation, and locoregional drug delivery, can enhance chimeric antigen receptor T cell therapy in solid tumors by improving tumor infiltration and reducing systemic toxicities. Additionally, ablation and radiotherapy have proven to (re-)activate systemic immune responses via abscopal effects and reprogram the tumor microenvironment on a physical, cellular, and chemical level. This review highlights the potential synergy of the combined approaches to overcome barriers of chimeric antigen receptor T cell therapy and summarizes recent studies that may pave the way for new treatment regimens.</p>","PeriodicalId":9022,"journal":{"name":"BioDrugs","volume":" ","pages":"611-637"},"PeriodicalIF":5.4,"publicationDate":"2024-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11358237/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141854702","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-09-01Epub Date: 2024-08-22DOI: 10.1007/s40259-024-00673-2
Ashish Srinivasan, Daniel van Langenberg, Peter De Cruz, Jonathan Segal, Abhinav Vasudevan, Richard N Upton
<p><strong>Background: </strong>The optimal infliximab dose intensification strategy to address loss of response associated with subtherapeutic infliximab trough levels remains uncertain, as does whether post-intensification trough and treatment targets should influence this decision.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>This pharmacokinetic simulation study aimed to identify infliximab dose intensification strategies capable of achieving post-intensification infliximab trough thresholds associated with clinical and objective treatment targets in Crohn's disease and ulcerative colitis.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A validated pharmacokinetic infliximab model, applied to 200 simulated patients, identified those with subtherapeutic (< 3.00 mg/L) trough levels after 30 weeks of standard (5 mg/kg 8-weekly) dosing, and subsequently applied 10 dose intensification strategies over a further 32 weeks. The proportion of simulations achieving 32-week post-intensification infliximab trough levels associated with endoscopic remission (ulcerative colitis > 7.50 mg/L, Crohn's disease > 9.70 mg/L) was the primary outcome, with perianal fistula healing (Crohn's disease > 10.10 mg/L) and clinical improvement (ulcerative colitis > 3.70 mg/L, Crohn's disease > 7.00mg/L) evaluated as secondary outcomes. All outcomes were stratified by intensity of dose intensification, with standard (≤ 10 mg/kg 8-weekly or 5 mg/kg 4-weekly; n = 5) and intensive (> 10 mg/kg 8-weekly or 5 mg/kg 4-weekly; n = 5) dosing strategies defined, respectively.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The median pre-intensification infliximab trough level was 0.91 mg/L (interquartile range 1.37). Intensive dosing strategies were more likely to achieve infliximab trough concentrations associated with endoscopic remission (ulcerative colitis 36.48% vs. 10.80%, Crohn's disease 25.98 vs. 4.68%), perianal fistula healing (24.52% vs. 4.36%) and clinical improvement (ulcerative colitis 61.90% vs. 34.86%, Crohn's disease 40.32 vs. 12.08%) than standard intensification strategies (all p < 0.01). When controlling for cumulative (mg/kg) infliximab dose over 32 weeks, strategies that concurrently dose increased and interval shortened achieved the highest infliximab trough levels (all p < 0.01).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This simulation-based analysis highlights the potential of using post-intensification infliximab trough thresholds associated with aspirational treatment targets in Crohn's disease and ulcerative colitis to guide choice of infliximab dose intensification strategy. Intensive dose intensification strategies, particularly those that concurrently dose increase and interval shorten, appear to achieve higher infliximab levels than standard dose intensification strategies. This may be particularly important in the pursuit of stringent endpoints, such as endoscopic remission and fistula healing, which have been consistently associated with higher infliximab trough levels. These findings require va
背景:解决因夫利昔单抗低谷水平治疗相关的应答丧失问题的最佳英夫利昔单抗剂量加强策略,以及加强后低谷和治疗目标是否应影响这一决定,仍不确定:这项药代动力学模拟研究旨在确定英夫利西单抗剂量加强策略,以达到与克罗恩病和溃疡性结肠炎临床和客观治疗目标相关的加强后英夫利西单抗谷值阈值:将经过验证的药代动力学英夫利西单抗模型应用于200名模拟患者,确定治疗效果不达标者(7.50 mg/L,克罗恩病>9.70 mg/L)为主要结果,肛周瘘愈合(克罗恩病>10.10 mg/L)和临床改善(溃疡性结肠炎>3.70 mg/L,克罗恩病>7.00 mg/L)为次要结果。所有结果均按剂量强化强度分层,分别定义了标准(≤ 10 mg/kg 8周一次或5 mg/kg 4周一次;n = 5)和强化(> 10 mg/kg 8周一次或5 mg/kg 4周一次;n = 5)剂量策略:结果:强化前英夫利西单抗谷值的中位数为0.91毫克/升(四分位距为1.37)。与标准强化策略相比,强化给药策略更有可能达到与内镜缓解(溃疡性结肠炎 36.48% vs. 10.80%,克罗恩病 25.98% vs. 4.68%)、肛周瘘管愈合(24.52% vs. 4.36%)和临床改善(溃疡性结肠炎 61.90% vs. 34.86%,克罗恩病 40.32% vs. 12.08%)相关的英夫利西单抗谷浓度(均为 p 结论:这项基于模拟的分析强调了使用与克罗恩病和溃疡性结肠炎理想治疗目标相关的强化后英夫利西单抗谷阈值来指导选择英夫利西单抗剂量强化策略的潜力。与标准剂量强化策略相比,强化剂量强化策略,尤其是同时增加剂量和缩短间隔的策略,似乎能达到更高的英夫利西单抗水平。这对于追求严格的终点(如内镜下缓解和瘘管愈合)可能尤为重要,因为这些终点一直与较高的英夫利西单抗谷值水平相关。这些发现需要在真实世界的队列中进行验证。
{"title":"Treatment Targets Should Influence Choice of Infliximab Dose Intensification Strategy in Inflammatory Bowel Disease: A Pharmacokinetic Simulation Study.","authors":"Ashish Srinivasan, Daniel van Langenberg, Peter De Cruz, Jonathan Segal, Abhinav Vasudevan, Richard N Upton","doi":"10.1007/s40259-024-00673-2","DOIUrl":"10.1007/s40259-024-00673-2","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The optimal infliximab dose intensification strategy to address loss of response associated with subtherapeutic infliximab trough levels remains uncertain, as does whether post-intensification trough and treatment targets should influence this decision.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>This pharmacokinetic simulation study aimed to identify infliximab dose intensification strategies capable of achieving post-intensification infliximab trough thresholds associated with clinical and objective treatment targets in Crohn's disease and ulcerative colitis.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A validated pharmacokinetic infliximab model, applied to 200 simulated patients, identified those with subtherapeutic (< 3.00 mg/L) trough levels after 30 weeks of standard (5 mg/kg 8-weekly) dosing, and subsequently applied 10 dose intensification strategies over a further 32 weeks. The proportion of simulations achieving 32-week post-intensification infliximab trough levels associated with endoscopic remission (ulcerative colitis > 7.50 mg/L, Crohn's disease > 9.70 mg/L) was the primary outcome, with perianal fistula healing (Crohn's disease > 10.10 mg/L) and clinical improvement (ulcerative colitis > 3.70 mg/L, Crohn's disease > 7.00mg/L) evaluated as secondary outcomes. All outcomes were stratified by intensity of dose intensification, with standard (≤ 10 mg/kg 8-weekly or 5 mg/kg 4-weekly; n = 5) and intensive (> 10 mg/kg 8-weekly or 5 mg/kg 4-weekly; n = 5) dosing strategies defined, respectively.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The median pre-intensification infliximab trough level was 0.91 mg/L (interquartile range 1.37). Intensive dosing strategies were more likely to achieve infliximab trough concentrations associated with endoscopic remission (ulcerative colitis 36.48% vs. 10.80%, Crohn's disease 25.98 vs. 4.68%), perianal fistula healing (24.52% vs. 4.36%) and clinical improvement (ulcerative colitis 61.90% vs. 34.86%, Crohn's disease 40.32 vs. 12.08%) than standard intensification strategies (all p < 0.01). When controlling for cumulative (mg/kg) infliximab dose over 32 weeks, strategies that concurrently dose increased and interval shortened achieved the highest infliximab trough levels (all p < 0.01).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This simulation-based analysis highlights the potential of using post-intensification infliximab trough thresholds associated with aspirational treatment targets in Crohn's disease and ulcerative colitis to guide choice of infliximab dose intensification strategy. Intensive dose intensification strategies, particularly those that concurrently dose increase and interval shorten, appear to achieve higher infliximab levels than standard dose intensification strategies. This may be particularly important in the pursuit of stringent endpoints, such as endoscopic remission and fistula healing, which have been consistently associated with higher infliximab trough levels. These findings require va","PeriodicalId":9022,"journal":{"name":"BioDrugs","volume":" ","pages":"691-702"},"PeriodicalIF":5.4,"publicationDate":"2024-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11358351/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142016304","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-09-01DOI: 10.1007/s40259-024-00672-3
Yujie Liu, Jianhua Xie, Zhuxiang Li, Xiong Mei, Di Cao, Shengfeng Li, Linda Engle, Suli Liu, Hans C Ebbers, Cuihua Liu
{"title":"Correction to: Demonstration of Physicochemical and Functional Similarity of the Biosimilar BAT1806/BIIB800 to Reference Tocilizumab.","authors":"Yujie Liu, Jianhua Xie, Zhuxiang Li, Xiong Mei, Di Cao, Shengfeng Li, Linda Engle, Suli Liu, Hans C Ebbers, Cuihua Liu","doi":"10.1007/s40259-024-00672-3","DOIUrl":"10.1007/s40259-024-00672-3","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":9022,"journal":{"name":"BioDrugs","volume":" ","pages":"725"},"PeriodicalIF":5.4,"publicationDate":"2024-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11358319/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142016303","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-09-01Epub Date: 2024-08-23DOI: 10.1007/s40259-024-00675-0
Alessandra Zanetti, Rosella Tomanin
Mucopolysaccharidosis type II (MPS II) is a rare, pediatric, neurometabolic disorder due to the lack of activity of the lysosomal hydrolase iduronate 2-sulfatase (IDS), normally degrading heparan sulfate and dermatan sulfate within cell lysosomes. The deficit of activity is caused by mutations affecting the IDS gene, leading to the pathological accumulation of both glycosaminoglycans in the lysosomal compartment and in the extracellular matrix of most body districts. Although a continuum of clinical phenotypes is described, two main forms are commonly recognized-attenuated and severe-the latter being characterized by an earlier and faster clinical progression and by a progressive impairment of central nervous system (CNS) functions. However, attenuated forms have also been recently described as presenting some neurological involvement, although less deep, such as deficits of attention and hearing loss. The main treatment for the disease is represented by enzyme replacement therapy (ERT), applied in several countries since 2006, which, albeit showing partial efficacy on some peripheral organs, exhibited a very poor efficacy on bones and heart, and a total inefficacy on CNS impairment, due to the inability of the recombinant enzyme to cross the blood-brain barrier (BBB). Together with ERT, whose design enhancements, performed in the last few years, allowed a possible brain penetration of the drug through the BBB, other therapeutic approaches aimed at targeting CNS involvement in MPS II were proposed and evaluated in the last decades, such as intrathecal ERT, intracerebroventricular ERT, ex vivo gene therapy, or adeno-associated viral vector (AAV) gene therapy. The aim of this review is to summarize the main clinical aspects of MPS II in addition to current therapeutic options, with particular emphasis on the neurological ones and on the main CNS-targeted therapeutic approaches explored through the years.
II 型粘多糖病(MPS II)是一种罕见的儿科神经代谢性疾病,是由于溶酶体水解酶伊杜醛酸 2-硫酸酯酶(IDS)缺乏活性所致,该酶通常在细胞溶酶体内降解硫酸肝酯和硫酸真皮酯。影响 IDS 基因的突变会导致 IDS 活性缺失,从而导致这两种糖胺聚糖在溶酶体区和大多数体区的细胞外基质中发生病理性积聚。虽然临床表现形式多种多样,但常见的主要有两种--减轻型和重症型,后者的特点是临床进展更早、更快,中枢神经系统(CNS)功能逐渐受损。不过,最近也有描述称,减轻型也会出现一些神经系统受累,但程度较轻,如注意力缺陷和听力损失。该疗法虽然对一些外周器官有部分疗效,但对骨骼和心脏的疗效很差,对中枢神经系统的损害则完全无效,原因是重组酶无法穿过血脑屏障(BBB)。在过去的几十年中,人们提出并评估了其他治疗方法,例如鞘内 ERT、脑室内 ERT、体外基因治疗或腺相关病毒载体(AAV)基因治疗,这些方法的目的都是针对中枢神经系统受累的 MPS II。本综述旨在总结 MPS II 的主要临床表现以及当前的治疗方案,尤其侧重于神经系统方面以及多年来探索的主要中枢神经系统靶向治疗方法。
{"title":"Targeting Neurological Aspects of Mucopolysaccharidosis Type II: Enzyme Replacement Therapy and Beyond.","authors":"Alessandra Zanetti, Rosella Tomanin","doi":"10.1007/s40259-024-00675-0","DOIUrl":"10.1007/s40259-024-00675-0","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Mucopolysaccharidosis type II (MPS II) is a rare, pediatric, neurometabolic disorder due to the lack of activity of the lysosomal hydrolase iduronate 2-sulfatase (IDS), normally degrading heparan sulfate and dermatan sulfate within cell lysosomes. The deficit of activity is caused by mutations affecting the IDS gene, leading to the pathological accumulation of both glycosaminoglycans in the lysosomal compartment and in the extracellular matrix of most body districts. Although a continuum of clinical phenotypes is described, two main forms are commonly recognized-attenuated and severe-the latter being characterized by an earlier and faster clinical progression and by a progressive impairment of central nervous system (CNS) functions. However, attenuated forms have also been recently described as presenting some neurological involvement, although less deep, such as deficits of attention and hearing loss. The main treatment for the disease is represented by enzyme replacement therapy (ERT), applied in several countries since 2006, which, albeit showing partial efficacy on some peripheral organs, exhibited a very poor efficacy on bones and heart, and a total inefficacy on CNS impairment, due to the inability of the recombinant enzyme to cross the blood-brain barrier (BBB). Together with ERT, whose design enhancements, performed in the last few years, allowed a possible brain penetration of the drug through the BBB, other therapeutic approaches aimed at targeting CNS involvement in MPS II were proposed and evaluated in the last decades, such as intrathecal ERT, intracerebroventricular ERT, ex vivo gene therapy, or adeno-associated viral vector (AAV) gene therapy. The aim of this review is to summarize the main clinical aspects of MPS II in addition to current therapeutic options, with particular emphasis on the neurological ones and on the main CNS-targeted therapeutic approaches explored through the years.</p>","PeriodicalId":9022,"journal":{"name":"BioDrugs","volume":" ","pages":"639-655"},"PeriodicalIF":5.4,"publicationDate":"2024-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11358193/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142035148","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-09-01Epub Date: 2024-08-23DOI: 10.1007/s40259-024-00674-1
Marina Beraza-Millor, Julen Rodríguez-Castejón, Ana Del Pozo-Rodríguez, Alicia Rodríguez-Gascón, María Ángeles Solinís
Background: Genetic substrate reduction therapy (gSRT), which involves the use of nucleic acids to downregulate the genes involved in the biosynthesis of storage substances, has been investigated in the treatment of lysosomal storage diseases (LSDs).
Objective: To analyze the application of gSRT to the treatment of LSDs, identifying the silencing tools and delivery systems used, and the main challenges for its development and clinical translation, highlighting the contribution of nanotechnology to overcome them.
Methods: A systematic review following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) reporting guidelines was performed. PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science databases were used for searching terms related to LSDs and gene-silencing strategies and tools.
Results: Fabry, Gaucher, and Pompe diseases and mucopolysaccharidoses I and III are the only LSDs for which gSRT has been studied, siRNA and lipid nanoparticles being the silencing strategy and the delivery system most frequently employed, respectively. Only in one recently published study was CRISPR/Cas9 applied to treat Fabry disease. Specific tissue targeting, availability of relevant cell and animal LSD models, and the rare disease condition are the main challenges with gSRT for the treatment of these diseases. Out of the 11 studies identified, only two gSRT studies were evaluated in animal models.
Conclusions: Nucleic acid therapies are expanding the clinical tools and therapies currently available for LSDs. Recent advances in CRISPR/Cas9 technology and the growing impact of nanotechnology are expected to boost the clinical translation of gSRT in the near future, and not only for LSDs.
{"title":"Systematic Review of Genetic Substrate Reduction Therapy in Lysosomal Storage Diseases: Opportunities, Challenges and Delivery Systems.","authors":"Marina Beraza-Millor, Julen Rodríguez-Castejón, Ana Del Pozo-Rodríguez, Alicia Rodríguez-Gascón, María Ángeles Solinís","doi":"10.1007/s40259-024-00674-1","DOIUrl":"10.1007/s40259-024-00674-1","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Genetic substrate reduction therapy (gSRT), which involves the use of nucleic acids to downregulate the genes involved in the biosynthesis of storage substances, has been investigated in the treatment of lysosomal storage diseases (LSDs).</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To analyze the application of gSRT to the treatment of LSDs, identifying the silencing tools and delivery systems used, and the main challenges for its development and clinical translation, highlighting the contribution of nanotechnology to overcome them.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A systematic review following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) reporting guidelines was performed. PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science databases were used for searching terms related to LSDs and gene-silencing strategies and tools.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Fabry, Gaucher, and Pompe diseases and mucopolysaccharidoses I and III are the only LSDs for which gSRT has been studied, siRNA and lipid nanoparticles being the silencing strategy and the delivery system most frequently employed, respectively. Only in one recently published study was CRISPR/Cas9 applied to treat Fabry disease. Specific tissue targeting, availability of relevant cell and animal LSD models, and the rare disease condition are the main challenges with gSRT for the treatment of these diseases. Out of the 11 studies identified, only two gSRT studies were evaluated in animal models.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Nucleic acid therapies are expanding the clinical tools and therapies currently available for LSDs. Recent advances in CRISPR/Cas9 technology and the growing impact of nanotechnology are expected to boost the clinical translation of gSRT in the near future, and not only for LSDs.</p>","PeriodicalId":9022,"journal":{"name":"BioDrugs","volume":" ","pages":"657-680"},"PeriodicalIF":5.4,"publicationDate":"2024-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11358353/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142035057","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-09-01DOI: 10.1007/s40259-024-00670-5
Hannah A Blair
Insulin icodec (AWIQLI®) is an ultra-long-acting basal insulin analogue that is being developed by Novo Nordisk for the treatment of diabetes mellitus. Administered once weekly as a subcutaneous injection, insulin icodec is designed to improve treatment adherence and glycaemic control relative to once-daily insulin analogues. On 7 March 2024, insulin icodec was approved in Switzerland for the treatment of diabetes mellitus in adults. Insulin icodec was approved in Canada on 12 March 2024 for the once-weekly treatment of adults with diabetes mellitus to improve glycaemic control and received EU approval in May 2024 for the treatment of diabetes mellitus in adults. This article summarizes the milestones in the development of insulin icodec leading to this first approval for diabetes mellitus.
{"title":"Insulin Icodec: First Approval.","authors":"Hannah A Blair","doi":"10.1007/s40259-024-00670-5","DOIUrl":"10.1007/s40259-024-00670-5","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Insulin icodec (AWIQLI<sup>®</sup>) is an ultra-long-acting basal insulin analogue that is being developed by Novo Nordisk for the treatment of diabetes mellitus. Administered once weekly as a subcutaneous injection, insulin icodec is designed to improve treatment adherence and glycaemic control relative to once-daily insulin analogues. On 7 March 2024, insulin icodec was approved in Switzerland for the treatment of diabetes mellitus in adults. Insulin icodec was approved in Canada on 12 March 2024 for the once-weekly treatment of adults with diabetes mellitus to improve glycaemic control and received EU approval in May 2024 for the treatment of diabetes mellitus in adults. This article summarizes the milestones in the development of insulin icodec leading to this first approval for diabetes mellitus.</p>","PeriodicalId":9022,"journal":{"name":"BioDrugs","volume":" ","pages":"717-724"},"PeriodicalIF":5.4,"publicationDate":"2024-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141730995","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-09-01Epub Date: 2024-08-15DOI: 10.1007/s40259-024-00676-z
Capucine Arrivé, Caroline Bazzoli, Thomas Jouve, Johan Noble, Lionel Rostaing, Françoise Stanke-Labesque, Zoubir Djerada
Background: Tocilizumab prevents the clinical worsening of chronic active antibody-mediated rejection (CAAMR) in kidney transplant recipients. Following a global shortage of the intravenous pharmaceutical form in 2022, patients were switched from monthly intravenous administration of 8 mg/kg to weekly subcutaneous injection of 162 mg, raising the question of bioequivalence between these schemes of administration.
Aims: We aimed to compare the areas under the curve (AUC) of tocilizumab in virtual simulations of populations treated with the two administration schemes and to identify the covariates that could contribute to pharmacokinetic variability of tocilizumab in kidney transplant patients with CAAMR who received tocilizumab as salvage treatment.
Methods: This retrospective monocentric study included 43 kidney transplant patients (202 tocilizumab concentrations) with CAAMR treated with intravenous or subcutaneous tocilizumab between December 2020 and January 2023. We developed a population pharmacokinetic model using nonlinear mixed effects modeling and identified the covariates that could contribute to tocilizumab AUC variability. Monte Carlo simulations were then performed to assess the subcutaneous and intravenous tocilizumab AUC for 0-28 days (M1), 56-84 days (M3), 140-168 days (M6), and 308-336 days (M12). Bioequivalence was defined by SC/IV AUC geometric mean ratios (GMRs) between 0.80 and 1.25.
Results: A two-compartment model with parallel linear and nonlinear elimination best described the concentration-time data. Significant covariates for tocilizumab clearance were body weight, urinary albumin-to-creatinine ratio (ACR), and inflammation status [C-reactive protein (CRP) ≥ 5 mg/L]. The GMR values and their 90% confidence intervals at M3, M6, and M12 were within the 0.8-1.25 margin for equivalence. Conversely, the 90% prediction intervals of the GMR were much wider than the 90% confidence intervals and did not fall within 0.8 and 1.25.
Conclusions: From month 3 of treatment, the subcutaneous and intravenous tocilizumab administration schemes provided average bioequivalent pharmacokinetic exposure at the population level but not at the individual level. Body weight, inflammation, ACR, and administration scheme should be considered to personalize the dose of tocilizumab for patients with CAAMR. Further studies are required to determine the target of tocilizumab exposure in kidney transplant patients with CAAMR.
{"title":"A Population Pharmacokinetic Model of Tocilizumab in Kidney Transplant Patients Treated for Chronic Active Antibody-Mediated Rejection: Comparison of Plasma Exposure Between Intravenous and Subcutaneous Administration Schemes.","authors":"Capucine Arrivé, Caroline Bazzoli, Thomas Jouve, Johan Noble, Lionel Rostaing, Françoise Stanke-Labesque, Zoubir Djerada","doi":"10.1007/s40259-024-00676-z","DOIUrl":"10.1007/s40259-024-00676-z","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Tocilizumab prevents the clinical worsening of chronic active antibody-mediated rejection (CAAMR) in kidney transplant recipients. Following a global shortage of the intravenous pharmaceutical form in 2022, patients were switched from monthly intravenous administration of 8 mg/kg to weekly subcutaneous injection of 162 mg, raising the question of bioequivalence between these schemes of administration.</p><p><strong>Aims: </strong>We aimed to compare the areas under the curve (AUC) of tocilizumab in virtual simulations of populations treated with the two administration schemes and to identify the covariates that could contribute to pharmacokinetic variability of tocilizumab in kidney transplant patients with CAAMR who received tocilizumab as salvage treatment.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This retrospective monocentric study included 43 kidney transplant patients (202 tocilizumab concentrations) with CAAMR treated with intravenous or subcutaneous tocilizumab between December 2020 and January 2023. We developed a population pharmacokinetic model using nonlinear mixed effects modeling and identified the covariates that could contribute to tocilizumab AUC variability. Monte Carlo simulations were then performed to assess the subcutaneous and intravenous tocilizumab AUC for 0-28 days (M1), 56-84 days (M3), 140-168 days (M6), and 308-336 days (M12). Bioequivalence was defined by SC/IV AUC geometric mean ratios (GMRs) between 0.80 and 1.25.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A two-compartment model with parallel linear and nonlinear elimination best described the concentration-time data. Significant covariates for tocilizumab clearance were body weight, urinary albumin-to-creatinine ratio (ACR), and inflammation status [C-reactive protein (CRP) ≥ 5 mg/L]. The GMR values and their 90% confidence intervals at M3, M6, and M12 were within the 0.8-1.25 margin for equivalence. Conversely, the 90% prediction intervals of the GMR were much wider than the 90% confidence intervals and did not fall within 0.8 and 1.25.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>From month 3 of treatment, the subcutaneous and intravenous tocilizumab administration schemes provided average bioequivalent pharmacokinetic exposure at the population level but not at the individual level. Body weight, inflammation, ACR, and administration scheme should be considered to personalize the dose of tocilizumab for patients with CAAMR. Further studies are required to determine the target of tocilizumab exposure in kidney transplant patients with CAAMR.</p>","PeriodicalId":9022,"journal":{"name":"BioDrugs","volume":" ","pages":"703-716"},"PeriodicalIF":5.4,"publicationDate":"2024-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141987368","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}