Pub Date : 2024-07-01Epub Date: 2024-06-27DOI: 10.1007/s40259-024-00666-1
Helen W Wong, Vivian H Nguyen, Timothy Y Mok, Fang Niu, Merta Cushing, Michael Lam, Stephanie L Ho, Lisa Law, Ashraf R Aziz, Rita L Hui
Background: Rituximab with cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, and prednisone (R-CHOP) is one of the first line treatments for diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL). Rituximab comprises most of the treatment cost for this regimen; therefore, biosimilars, such as rituximab-abbs are crucial to provide affordable care. Although rituximab-abbs was studied primarily in follicular lymphoma, the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approved this drug for all indications of the reference product on the basis of extrapolation. Effectiveness and safety data surrounding the use of rituximab-abbs in DLBCL is lacking.
Objective: To evaluate the effectiveness and safety of rituximab-abbs and reference product rituximab as R-CHOP treatment for patients with DLBCL.
Patients and methods: This noninferiority (NI) study compared the 2-year overall survival (OS), overall response rate (ORR), and incidence of adverse events (AEs) between rituximab-abbs and its reference product (RP) in R-CHOP among adult patients with newly diagnosed DLBCL. The study inclusion period was from 1 January 2019 to 31 December 2020. Analyses were performed on the basis of a noninferiority lower limit of 10% for OS and ORR, and an upper limit of 10% for serious AEs.
Results: There were 240 patients who received RP rituximab, while 295 patients received rituximab-abbs. The cohort had a mean age of 63.7±12.2 years and 43% were female. The 2-year OS was 81.0% and 79.6% (NI p < 0.01) while the ORR was 80.0% and 69.6% (NI p < 0.01), among the rituximab-abbs and rituximab groups, respectively. The incidence of infusion reaction AEs (NI p < 0.01) and noninfusion reaction AEs (NI p < 0.01) also met noninferiority.
Conclusions: We demonstrated that rituximab-abbs was noninferior to rituximab in both effectiveness and safety among patients receiving R-CHOP for DLBCL in this study. Long-term follow-up would be needed to confirm these results.
背景:利妥昔单抗联合环磷酰胺、多柔比星、长春新碱和泼尼松(R-CHOP)是弥漫大 B 细胞淋巴瘤(DLBCL)的一线治疗方案之一。利妥昔单抗占这一治疗方案的大部分治疗费用;因此,生物仿制药(如利妥昔单抗-单抗)对于提供可负担得起的治疗至关重要。虽然利妥昔单抗-abbs 主要针对滤泡性淋巴瘤进行研究,但美国食品药品管理局(FDA)根据外推法批准该药物用于参照产品的所有适应症。目前还缺乏有关利妥昔单抗抗体用于DLBCL的有效性和安全性数据:评估利妥昔单抗和参比产品利妥昔单抗作为 R-CHOP 治疗 DLBCL 患者的有效性和安全性:这项非劣效性(NI)研究比较了利妥昔单抗和其参比产品(RP)在新诊断DLBCL成人患者R-CHOP治疗中的2年总生存率(OS)、总反应率(ORR)和不良事件(AEs)发生率。研究纳入期为2019年1月1日至2020年12月31日。在OS和ORR的非劣效性下限为10%、严重AEs的非劣效性上限为10%的基础上进行分析:240名患者接受了利妥昔单抗RP治疗,295名患者接受了利妥昔单抗-抗体治疗。患者平均年龄为(63.7±12.2)岁,43%为女性。利妥昔单抗-单抗组和利妥昔单抗组的2年OS分别为81.0%和79.6%(NI p < 0.01),ORR分别为80.0%和69.6%(NI p < 0.01)。输液反应AEs(NI p < 0.01)和非输液反应AEs(NI p < 0.01)的发生率也达到了非劣效性:我们证明,在接受R-CHOP治疗的DLBCL患者中,利妥昔单抗-抗体在有效性和安全性方面均不劣于利妥昔单抗。要证实这些结果,还需要长期随访。
{"title":"Outcomes of Rituximab-abbs versus Rituximab in Patients with Diffuse Large B-Cell Lymphoma in a Noninferiority Study.","authors":"Helen W Wong, Vivian H Nguyen, Timothy Y Mok, Fang Niu, Merta Cushing, Michael Lam, Stephanie L Ho, Lisa Law, Ashraf R Aziz, Rita L Hui","doi":"10.1007/s40259-024-00666-1","DOIUrl":"10.1007/s40259-024-00666-1","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Rituximab with cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, and prednisone (R-CHOP) is one of the first line treatments for diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL). Rituximab comprises most of the treatment cost for this regimen; therefore, biosimilars, such as rituximab-abbs are crucial to provide affordable care. Although rituximab-abbs was studied primarily in follicular lymphoma, the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approved this drug for all indications of the reference product on the basis of extrapolation. Effectiveness and safety data surrounding the use of rituximab-abbs in DLBCL is lacking.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To evaluate the effectiveness and safety of rituximab-abbs and reference product rituximab as R-CHOP treatment for patients with DLBCL.</p><p><strong>Patients and methods: </strong>This noninferiority (NI) study compared the 2-year overall survival (OS), overall response rate (ORR), and incidence of adverse events (AEs) between rituximab-abbs and its reference product (RP) in R-CHOP among adult patients with newly diagnosed DLBCL. The study inclusion period was from 1 January 2019 to 31 December 2020. Analyses were performed on the basis of a noninferiority lower limit of 10% for OS and ORR, and an upper limit of 10% for serious AEs.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There were 240 patients who received RP rituximab, while 295 patients received rituximab-abbs. The cohort had a mean age of 63.7±12.2 years and 43% were female. The 2-year OS was 81.0% and 79.6% (NI p < 0.01) while the ORR was 80.0% and 69.6% (NI p < 0.01), among the rituximab-abbs and rituximab groups, respectively. The incidence of infusion reaction AEs (NI p < 0.01) and noninfusion reaction AEs (NI p < 0.01) also met noninferiority.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>We demonstrated that rituximab-abbs was noninferior to rituximab in both effectiveness and safety among patients receiving R-CHOP for DLBCL in this study. Long-term follow-up would be needed to confirm these results.</p>","PeriodicalId":9022,"journal":{"name":"BioDrugs","volume":" ","pages":"601-610"},"PeriodicalIF":5.4,"publicationDate":"2024-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141455172","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-07-01Epub Date: 2024-05-20DOI: 10.1007/s40259-024-00660-7
Laura Bender Somme, Christos Chouaid, Fabien Moinard-Butot, Jean-Baptiste Barbe-Richaud, Laurent Greillier, Roland Schott
Antibody-drug conjugates (ADCs) are an emerging class of therapeutics for lung cancer, and several are currently in development for this malignancy. The structure of these molecules is based on an antibody that targets a protein on the lung cancer cell surface and a cytotoxic payload attached by a linker. Many protein targets, including TROP2, c-MET, CEACAM5, HER2, and HER3 have been identified. In metastatic non-small cell lung carcinoma (NSCLC) without alterations in oncogenic drivers, platinum-based chemotherapy and immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) targeting the programmed death-1/programmed death-ligand 1 (PD1/PDL1) interaction are the standard first-line treatments. In patients with EGFR-mutated or ALK-rearranged NSCLC, tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) are recommended. However, although the prognosis of patients with metastatic NSCLC differs between such with and without alterations in oncogenic drivers, most patients eventually experience disease progression. A novel therapeutic class is needed in routine practice to overcome the mechanisms of resistance to ICIs and EGFR/ALK TKIs. Several ADCs have already been approved for other cancers, such as breast cancer and urothelial carcinoma. This review summarizes the knowledge about the efficacy and tolerance profiles of ADCs targeting TROP2, HER2, HER3, CEACAM5 and c-MET in metastatic NSCLC with and without alterations in oncogenic drivers.
{"title":"Antibody-Drug Conjugates as Novel Therapeutic Agents for Non-Small Cell Lung Carcinoma with or without Alterations in Oncogenic Drivers.","authors":"Laura Bender Somme, Christos Chouaid, Fabien Moinard-Butot, Jean-Baptiste Barbe-Richaud, Laurent Greillier, Roland Schott","doi":"10.1007/s40259-024-00660-7","DOIUrl":"10.1007/s40259-024-00660-7","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Antibody-drug conjugates (ADCs) are an emerging class of therapeutics for lung cancer, and several are currently in development for this malignancy. The structure of these molecules is based on an antibody that targets a protein on the lung cancer cell surface and a cytotoxic payload attached by a linker. Many protein targets, including TROP2, c-MET, CEACAM5, HER2, and HER3 have been identified. In metastatic non-small cell lung carcinoma (NSCLC) without alterations in oncogenic drivers, platinum-based chemotherapy and immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) targeting the programmed death-1/programmed death-ligand 1 (PD1/PDL1) interaction are the standard first-line treatments. In patients with EGFR-mutated or ALK-rearranged NSCLC, tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) are recommended. However, although the prognosis of patients with metastatic NSCLC differs between such with and without alterations in oncogenic drivers, most patients eventually experience disease progression. A novel therapeutic class is needed in routine practice to overcome the mechanisms of resistance to ICIs and EGFR/ALK TKIs. Several ADCs have already been approved for other cancers, such as breast cancer and urothelial carcinoma. This review summarizes the knowledge about the efficacy and tolerance profiles of ADCs targeting TROP2, HER2, HER3, CEACAM5 and c-MET in metastatic NSCLC with and without alterations in oncogenic drivers.</p>","PeriodicalId":9022,"journal":{"name":"BioDrugs","volume":" ","pages":"487-497"},"PeriodicalIF":5.4,"publicationDate":"2024-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11247051/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141064612","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-07-01Epub Date: 2024-06-11DOI: 10.1007/s40259-024-00663-4
Marcin Stajszczyk, Krzysztof Batko, Zbigniew Michał Żuber, Brygida Kwiatkowska, Magdalena Krajewska-Włodarczyk, Bogdan Batko
Objectives: To evaluate the pricing of etanercept (ETN) reference and biosimilar drugs in a changing competitive to monopolized market.
Methods: We conducted a comprehensive, retrospective analysis of ETN market competition, specifically changes in tender price based on shifts in market monopoly, including the effects on cost evolution, in the off-patent market in Poland. We included a total of 473 tenders for ETN purchase in dedicated biologic drug reimbursement programs, covering both pre-filled syringes and automatic injectors. This study covers the timeframe from November 2017 to December 2023, throughout which we evaluated a unique setting of ETN market re-monopolization from the perspective of payer, hospital and patient benefits resulting from changing cost calculations.
Results: Between 2017 and 2022, Erelzi was recorded as having the largest total tender volume (59%), with a mean price [per ETN daily defined dose (DDD)] of €7.28, followed by Enbrel (31%, €8.34) and Benepali (10%, €9.45), respectively. Over the last 6 months of waning market competition, the mean price for winning bids was estimated at €5.69. After market re-monopolization by an ETN biosimilar, the mean price of winning bids increased to €8.09, and continued to increase (€9.71) in the last 6 months of available follow-up. In contrast to the competitive era, no significant relationship between tender volume and winning price was recorded after re-monopolization. In the most recent tenders, mean ETN prices increased up to €15.82, nearly tripling the lowest prices of the competitive market period. In the early re-monopolization market, mean annual treatment cost per patient is estimated at over €3800, which exceeds therapy costs in the prior competitive market years, and is expected to increase to over €6200 based on the most recent tenders. On a healthcare system level, this corresponds to over €3.42 million excess costs due to market monopoly. Higher ETN prices resulted in downstream failure of regulatory incentives to promote affordable biologics. Due to higher pricing, hospitals lost over an estimated €2.52 million, with possible risk of treatment restrictions. For the same reason, the public payer achieved comparable savings, allowing for partial coverage of higher reimbursement expenses.
Conclusions: This nation-level scenario of market re-monopolization by a biosimilar drug confirms net loss and excess costs for the healthcare payer, as can be expected from economic theory. The upwards drug repricing and restriction of treatment availability occurs much more rapidly than the decrement in a period of market competition.
{"title":"Charting the Etanercept Journey: Tracing Cost Dynamics in Poland's Off-Patent Market from Reference Drug Rivalry to Biosimilar Monopoly.","authors":"Marcin Stajszczyk, Krzysztof Batko, Zbigniew Michał Żuber, Brygida Kwiatkowska, Magdalena Krajewska-Włodarczyk, Bogdan Batko","doi":"10.1007/s40259-024-00663-4","DOIUrl":"10.1007/s40259-024-00663-4","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To evaluate the pricing of etanercept (ETN) reference and biosimilar drugs in a changing competitive to monopolized market.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a comprehensive, retrospective analysis of ETN market competition, specifically changes in tender price based on shifts in market monopoly, including the effects on cost evolution, in the off-patent market in Poland. We included a total of 473 tenders for ETN purchase in dedicated biologic drug reimbursement programs, covering both pre-filled syringes and automatic injectors. This study covers the timeframe from November 2017 to December 2023, throughout which we evaluated a unique setting of ETN market re-monopolization from the perspective of payer, hospital and patient benefits resulting from changing cost calculations.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Between 2017 and 2022, Erelzi was recorded as having the largest total tender volume (59%), with a mean price [per ETN daily defined dose (DDD)] of €7.28, followed by Enbrel (31%, €8.34) and Benepali (10%, €9.45), respectively. Over the last 6 months of waning market competition, the mean price for winning bids was estimated at €5.69. After market re-monopolization by an ETN biosimilar, the mean price of winning bids increased to €8.09, and continued to increase (€9.71) in the last 6 months of available follow-up. In contrast to the competitive era, no significant relationship between tender volume and winning price was recorded after re-monopolization. In the most recent tenders, mean ETN prices increased up to €15.82, nearly tripling the lowest prices of the competitive market period. In the early re-monopolization market, mean annual treatment cost per patient is estimated at over €3800, which exceeds therapy costs in the prior competitive market years, and is expected to increase to over €6200 based on the most recent tenders. On a healthcare system level, this corresponds to over €3.42 million excess costs due to market monopoly. Higher ETN prices resulted in downstream failure of regulatory incentives to promote affordable biologics. Due to higher pricing, hospitals lost over an estimated €2.52 million, with possible risk of treatment restrictions. For the same reason, the public payer achieved comparable savings, allowing for partial coverage of higher reimbursement expenses.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This nation-level scenario of market re-monopolization by a biosimilar drug confirms net loss and excess costs for the healthcare payer, as can be expected from economic theory. The upwards drug repricing and restriction of treatment availability occurs much more rapidly than the decrement in a period of market competition.</p>","PeriodicalId":9022,"journal":{"name":"BioDrugs","volume":" ","pages":"557-569"},"PeriodicalIF":5.4,"publicationDate":"2024-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11247056/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141299931","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-07-01Epub Date: 2024-05-03DOI: 10.1007/s40259-024-00657-2
Jennifer Wu
Immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI)-based therapy has made an unprecedented impact on survival benefit for a subset of cancer patients; however, only a subset of cancer patients is benefiting from ICI therapy if all cancer types are considered. With the advanced understanding of interactions of immune effector cell types and tumors, cell-based therapies are emerging as alternatives to patients who could not benefit from ICI therapy. Pioneering work of chimeric antigen receptor T (CAR-T) therapy for hematological malignancies has brought encouragement to a broad range of development for cellular-based cancer immunotherapy, both innate immune cell-based therapies and T-cell-based therapies. Innate immune cells are important cell types due to their rapid response, versatile function, superior safety profiles being demonstrated in early clinical development, and being able to utilize multiple allogeneic cell sources. Efforts on engineering innate immune cells and exploring their therapeutic potential are rapidly emerging. Some of the therapies, such as CD19 CAR natural killer (CAR-NK) cell-based therapy, have demonstrated comparable early efficacy with CD19 CAR-T cells. These studies underscore the significance of developing innate immune cells for cancer therapy. In this review, we focus on the current development of emerging NK cells, γδ T cells, and macrophages. We also present our views on potential challenges and perspectives to overcome these challenges.
基于免疫检查点抑制剂(ICI)的疗法对一部分癌症患者的生存获益产生了前所未有的影响;然而,如果考虑到所有癌症类型,只有一部分癌症患者能从 ICI 疗法中获益。随着对免疫效应细胞类型与肿瘤相互作用的深入了解,细胞疗法正在成为无法从 ICI 疗法中获益的患者的替代疗法。嵌合抗原受体 T(CAR-T)疗法治疗血液恶性肿瘤的开创性工作为基于细胞的癌症免疫疗法(包括基于先天性免疫细胞的疗法和基于 T 细胞的疗法)的广泛发展带来了鼓舞。先天性免疫细胞是一种重要的细胞类型,因为它们反应迅速、功能多样、在早期临床开发中表现出卓越的安全性,而且能够利用多种异体细胞来源。对先天性免疫细胞进行工程设计并探索其治疗潜力的努力正在迅速兴起。其中一些疗法,如基于 CD19 CAR 自然杀伤(CAR-NK)细胞的疗法,已显示出与 CD19 CAR-T 细胞相当的早期疗效。这些研究强调了开发先天性免疫细胞用于癌症治疗的重要性。在这篇综述中,我们将重点关注新兴 NK 细胞、γδ T 细胞和巨噬细胞目前的发展情况。我们还就潜在的挑战和克服这些挑战的前景提出了自己的看法。
{"title":"Emerging Innate Immune Cells in Cancer Immunotherapy: Promises and Challenges.","authors":"Jennifer Wu","doi":"10.1007/s40259-024-00657-2","DOIUrl":"10.1007/s40259-024-00657-2","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI)-based therapy has made an unprecedented impact on survival benefit for a subset of cancer patients; however, only a subset of cancer patients is benefiting from ICI therapy if all cancer types are considered. With the advanced understanding of interactions of immune effector cell types and tumors, cell-based therapies are emerging as alternatives to patients who could not benefit from ICI therapy. Pioneering work of chimeric antigen receptor T (CAR-T) therapy for hematological malignancies has brought encouragement to a broad range of development for cellular-based cancer immunotherapy, both innate immune cell-based therapies and T-cell-based therapies. Innate immune cells are important cell types due to their rapid response, versatile function, superior safety profiles being demonstrated in early clinical development, and being able to utilize multiple allogeneic cell sources. Efforts on engineering innate immune cells and exploring their therapeutic potential are rapidly emerging. Some of the therapies, such as CD19 CAR natural killer (CAR-NK) cell-based therapy, have demonstrated comparable early efficacy with CD19 CAR-T cells. These studies underscore the significance of developing innate immune cells for cancer therapy. In this review, we focus on the current development of emerging NK cells, γδ T cells, and macrophages. We also present our views on potential challenges and perspectives to overcome these challenges.</p>","PeriodicalId":9022,"journal":{"name":"BioDrugs","volume":" ","pages":"499-509"},"PeriodicalIF":5.4,"publicationDate":"2024-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11246812/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"140849034","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-07-01Epub Date: 2024-06-18DOI: 10.1007/s40259-024-00662-5
Yujie Liu, Jianhua Xie, Zhuxiang Li, Xiong Mei, Di Cao, Shengfeng Li, Linda Engle, Suli Liu, Hans C Ebbers, Cuihua Liu
Background and objective: Tocilizumab is an immunoglobulin G1 monoclonal antibody targeting the interleukin-6 receptor (IL-6R). BAT1806/BIIB800 (tocilizumab-bavi) has been developed as a biosimilar to the reference product tocilizumab (TCZ). The objective of this study was to demonstrate physicochemical and functional similarity between BAT1806/BIIB800 and TCZ in a comprehensive comparability exercise.
Methods: A comprehensive panel of over 20 methods was used to generate datasets comparing critical and non-critical product quality attributes for 10 BAT1806/BIIB800 lots and 44 TCZ lots (16 sourced from China, 16 from the EU, and 12 from the US). Primary structure, higher-order structure, and physicochemical properties were assessed using liquid chromatography, mass spectrometry, various spectroscopy techniques/methods, capillary electrophoresis, and thermoanalytical techniques. Fragment antigen-binding (Fab)- and fragment crystallizable (Fc)-mediated biological properties were assessed using cell-based assays, immunoassays, flow cytometry, and kinetic binding assays.
Results: BAT1806/BIIB800 and TCZ (irrespective of source) were shown to be similar in terms of structural and functional properties. No differences were observed in terms of the most critical quality attributes, that is, soluble-IL-6R binding and inhibition of IL-6-mediated cell proliferation. BAT1806/BIIB800 and TCZ demonstrated similarity in terms of Fab- and Fc-mediated binding and biological activity. Minor differences were observed in glycosylation (afucosylation and sialylation), glycation, aggregation, and charge variants, which were demonstrated to be not clinically relevant.
Conclusion: BAT1806/BIIB800 and TCZ were highly similar for all critical quality attributes. Where differences were observed in less critical quality attributes, additional analytical assessments and clinical study results determined these to be not clinically meaningful.
背景和目的托西珠单抗是一种靶向白细胞介素-6受体(IL-6R)的免疫球蛋白G1单克隆抗体。BAT1806/BIIB800(tocilizumab-bavi)已被开发为参考产品托西珠单抗(TCZ)的生物类似药。本研究的目的是通过全面的可比性实验证明 BAT1806/BIIB800 与 TCZ 在理化和功能上的相似性:方法:采用20多种方法生成数据集,比较10批次BAT1806/BIIB800和44批次TCZ(16批次来自中国,16批次来自欧盟,12批次来自美国)的关键和非关键产品质量属性。采用液相色谱法、质谱法、各种光谱技术/方法、毛细管电泳法和热分析技术对一级结构、高阶结构和理化性质进行了评估。使用细胞检测法、免疫测定法、流式细胞仪和动力学结合检测法评估了片段抗原结合(Fab)和片段可结晶(Fc)介导的生物特性:结果表明,BAT1806/BIIB800 和 TCZ(无论来源如何)在结构和功能特性方面相似。在最关键的质量属性方面,即可溶性 IL-6R 结合和抑制 IL-6 介导的细胞增殖方面,没有观察到差异。BAT1806/BIIB800 和 TCZ 在 Fab 和 Fc 介导的结合和生物活性方面表现出相似性。BAT1806/BIIB800和TCZ在糖基化(afucosylation和sialylation)、糖化、聚集和电荷变异方面存在微小差异,但这些差异已被证明与临床无关:BAT1806/BIIB800和TCZ在所有关键质量属性方面都非常相似。结论:BAT1806/BIIB800和TCZ在所有关键质量属性上高度相似,在不太关键的质量属性上出现差异时,额外的分析评估和临床研究结果表明这些差异没有临床意义。
{"title":"Demonstration of Physicochemical and Functional Similarity of the Biosimilar BAT1806/BIIB800 to Reference Tocilizumab.","authors":"Yujie Liu, Jianhua Xie, Zhuxiang Li, Xiong Mei, Di Cao, Shengfeng Li, Linda Engle, Suli Liu, Hans C Ebbers, Cuihua Liu","doi":"10.1007/s40259-024-00662-5","DOIUrl":"10.1007/s40259-024-00662-5","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and objective: </strong>Tocilizumab is an immunoglobulin G1 monoclonal antibody targeting the interleukin-6 receptor (IL-6R). BAT1806/BIIB800 (tocilizumab-bavi) has been developed as a biosimilar to the reference product tocilizumab (TCZ). The objective of this study was to demonstrate physicochemical and functional similarity between BAT1806/BIIB800 and TCZ in a comprehensive comparability exercise.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A comprehensive panel of over 20 methods was used to generate datasets comparing critical and non-critical product quality attributes for 10 BAT1806/BIIB800 lots and 44 TCZ lots (16 sourced from China, 16 from the EU, and 12 from the US). Primary structure, higher-order structure, and physicochemical properties were assessed using liquid chromatography, mass spectrometry, various spectroscopy techniques/methods, capillary electrophoresis, and thermoanalytical techniques. Fragment antigen-binding (Fab)- and fragment crystallizable (Fc)-mediated biological properties were assessed using cell-based assays, immunoassays, flow cytometry, and kinetic binding assays.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>BAT1806/BIIB800 and TCZ (irrespective of source) were shown to be similar in terms of structural and functional properties. No differences were observed in terms of the most critical quality attributes, that is, soluble-IL-6R binding and inhibition of IL-6-mediated cell proliferation. BAT1806/BIIB800 and TCZ demonstrated similarity in terms of Fab- and Fc-mediated binding and biological activity. Minor differences were observed in glycosylation (afucosylation and sialylation), glycation, aggregation, and charge variants, which were demonstrated to be not clinically relevant.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>BAT1806/BIIB800 and TCZ were highly similar for all critical quality attributes. Where differences were observed in less critical quality attributes, additional analytical assessments and clinical study results determined these to be not clinically meaningful.</p>","PeriodicalId":9022,"journal":{"name":"BioDrugs","volume":" ","pages":"571-588"},"PeriodicalIF":5.4,"publicationDate":"2024-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11247054/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141417611","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-07-01Epub Date: 2024-06-14DOI: 10.1007/s40259-024-00664-3
Richard H Woods
Background: Evolocumab and alirocumab are self-injected proprotein convertase subtilisin kexin type 9 (PCSK9) inhibitors indicated for low-density lipoprotein cholesterol reduction. Complications in the use or functionality of self-injection devices may precipitate incomplete dosing.
Objective: This study sought to characterize postmarketing dosing failure reports involving self-injected PCSK9 inhibitors.
Methods: US Food and Drug Administration Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS) [2016-second quarter of 2023] data were utilized for a disproportionality analysis. Eight self-injected comparator medications served as referents. Medical Dictionary for Regulatory Activities preferred terms indicating explicit or probable failure to administer a complete dose classified cases. Proportional reporting ratios (PRRs) > 2.0 and lower 95% confidence intervals (CIs) > 1.0 indicated disproportionality signals. US FDA Manufacturer and User Facility Device Experience (MAUDE) [2013-2023] data underwent a narrative review.
Results: During the study period, 194,781 (evolocumab, n = 152,831; alirocumab, n = 41,950) drug-event pairs and 43,725 (evolocumab, n = 38,489; alirocumab, n = 5236) cases reported to FAERS identified PCSK9 inhibitors. MAUDE contained six evolocumab reports, half describing dose omission, and no alirocumab reports. A potential dosing failure signal was detected for evolocumab (PRR 2.01; 95% CI 1.98-2.03), but not alirocumab (PRR 0.99; 95% CI 0.97-1.02), relative to pooled comparator reports. Across three case term subcategories, incomplete dosing disproportionality signals were further identified for evolocumab patient usage complication terms (PRR 3.44; 95% CI 3.38-3.50) and alirocumab device malfunction terms (PRR 2.09; 95% CI 1.98-2.22).
Conclusions: Proprotein convertase subtilisin kexin type 9 inhibitor incomplete dosing-related complications are frequently reported in the postmarketing setting. Systematic efforts to understand the incidence and mechanisms of dosing failure and associated patient burdens are needed.
{"title":"Postmarketing Reports of Incomplete Dosing-Related Complications with Self-Injected PCSK9 Inhibitors: A Descriptive Study and Disproportionality Analysis.","authors":"Richard H Woods","doi":"10.1007/s40259-024-00664-3","DOIUrl":"10.1007/s40259-024-00664-3","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Evolocumab and alirocumab are self-injected proprotein convertase subtilisin kexin type 9 (PCSK9) inhibitors indicated for low-density lipoprotein cholesterol reduction. Complications in the use or functionality of self-injection devices may precipitate incomplete dosing.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study sought to characterize postmarketing dosing failure reports involving self-injected PCSK9 inhibitors.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>US Food and Drug Administration Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS) [2016-second quarter of 2023] data were utilized for a disproportionality analysis. Eight self-injected comparator medications served as referents. Medical Dictionary for Regulatory Activities preferred terms indicating explicit or probable failure to administer a complete dose classified cases. Proportional reporting ratios (PRRs) > 2.0 and lower 95% confidence intervals (CIs) > 1.0 indicated disproportionality signals. US FDA Manufacturer and User Facility Device Experience (MAUDE) [2013-2023] data underwent a narrative review.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>During the study period, 194,781 (evolocumab, n = 152,831; alirocumab, n = 41,950) drug-event pairs and 43,725 (evolocumab, n = 38,489; alirocumab, n = 5236) cases reported to FAERS identified PCSK9 inhibitors. MAUDE contained six evolocumab reports, half describing dose omission, and no alirocumab reports. A potential dosing failure signal was detected for evolocumab (PRR 2.01; 95% CI 1.98-2.03), but not alirocumab (PRR 0.99; 95% CI 0.97-1.02), relative to pooled comparator reports. Across three case term subcategories, incomplete dosing disproportionality signals were further identified for evolocumab patient usage complication terms (PRR 3.44; 95% CI 3.38-3.50) and alirocumab device malfunction terms (PRR 2.09; 95% CI 1.98-2.22).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Proprotein convertase subtilisin kexin type 9 inhibitor incomplete dosing-related complications are frequently reported in the postmarketing setting. Systematic efforts to understand the incidence and mechanisms of dosing failure and associated patient burdens are needed.</p>","PeriodicalId":9022,"journal":{"name":"BioDrugs","volume":" ","pages":"589-600"},"PeriodicalIF":5.4,"publicationDate":"2024-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141316623","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-07-01Epub Date: 2024-06-25DOI: 10.1007/s40259-024-00665-2
Angela Sang, Selena Zhuo, Adara Bochanis, José E Manautou, Raman Bahal, Xiao-Bo Zhong, Theodore P Rasmussen
Antisense oligonucleotides (ASOs) are single stranded nucleic acids that target RNA. The US Food and Drug Administration has approved ASOs for several diseases. ASOs utilize three principal modes of action (MOA). The first MOA is initiated by base-pairing between the ASO and its target mRNA, followed by RNase H-dependent mRNA degradation. The second MOA is triggered by ASOs that occlude splice acceptor sites in pre-mRNAs leading to skipping of a mutation-bearing exon. The third MOA involves ASOs that sterically hinder mRNA function, often inhibiting translation. ASOs contain a variety of modifications to the sugar-phosphate backbone and bases that stabilize the ASO or render them resistant to RNase activity. RNase H-dependent ASOs include inotersen and eplontersen (for hereditary transthyretin amyloidosis), fomiversen (for opportunistic cytomegalovirus infection), mipomersen (for familial hypercholesterolemia), and tofersen [for amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS)]. Splice modulating ASOs include nursinersen (for spinal muscular atrophy) and eteplirsen, golodirsen, viltolarsen, and casimersen (all for the treatment of Duchenne muscular dystrophy). In addition, a designer ASO, milasen, was used to treat a single individual afflicted with Batten disease. Since ASO design relies principally upon knowledge of mRNA sequence, the bench to bedside pipeline for ASOs is expedient compared with protein-directed drugs. [Graphical abstract available.].
{"title":"Mechanisms of Action of the US Food and Drug Administration-Approved Antisense Oligonucleotide Drugs.","authors":"Angela Sang, Selena Zhuo, Adara Bochanis, José E Manautou, Raman Bahal, Xiao-Bo Zhong, Theodore P Rasmussen","doi":"10.1007/s40259-024-00665-2","DOIUrl":"10.1007/s40259-024-00665-2","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Antisense oligonucleotides (ASOs) are single stranded nucleic acids that target RNA. The US Food and Drug Administration has approved ASOs for several diseases. ASOs utilize three principal modes of action (MOA). The first MOA is initiated by base-pairing between the ASO and its target mRNA, followed by RNase H-dependent mRNA degradation. The second MOA is triggered by ASOs that occlude splice acceptor sites in pre-mRNAs leading to skipping of a mutation-bearing exon. The third MOA involves ASOs that sterically hinder mRNA function, often inhibiting translation. ASOs contain a variety of modifications to the sugar-phosphate backbone and bases that stabilize the ASO or render them resistant to RNase activity. RNase H-dependent ASOs include inotersen and eplontersen (for hereditary transthyretin amyloidosis), fomiversen (for opportunistic cytomegalovirus infection), mipomersen (for familial hypercholesterolemia), and tofersen [for amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS)]. Splice modulating ASOs include nursinersen (for spinal muscular atrophy) and eteplirsen, golodirsen, viltolarsen, and casimersen (all for the treatment of Duchenne muscular dystrophy). In addition, a designer ASO, milasen, was used to treat a single individual afflicted with Batten disease. Since ASO design relies principally upon knowledge of mRNA sequence, the bench to bedside pipeline for ASOs is expedient compared with protein-directed drugs. [Graphical abstract available.].</p>","PeriodicalId":9022,"journal":{"name":"BioDrugs","volume":" ","pages":"511-526"},"PeriodicalIF":5.4,"publicationDate":"2024-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11695194/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141445323","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-07-01Epub Date: 2024-07-02DOI: 10.1007/s40259-024-00667-0
John S Schardt, Neelan S Sivaneri, Peter M Tessier
The screening of antigen-specific B cells has been pivotal for biotherapeutic development for over four decades. Conventional antibody discovery strategies, including hybridoma technology and single B cell screening, remain widely used based on their simplicity, accessibility, and proven track record. Technological advances and the urgent demand for infectious disease applications have shifted paradigms in single B cell screening, resulting in increased throughput and decreased time and labor, ultimately enabling the rapid identification of monoclonal antibodies with desired biological and biophysical properties. Herein, we provide an overview of conventional and emergent single B cell screening approaches and highlight their potential strengths and weaknesses. We also detail the impact of innovative technologies-including miniaturization, microfluidics, multiplexing, and deep sequencing-on the recent identification of broadly neutralizing antibodies for infectious disease applications. Overall, the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic has reinvigorated efforts to improve the efficiency of monoclonal antibody discovery, resulting in the broad application of innovative antibody discovery methodologies for treating a myriad of infectious diseases and pathological conditions.
四十多年来,抗原特异性 B 细胞的筛选一直是生物治疗研发的关键。传统的抗体发现策略,包括杂交瘤技术和单个 B 细胞筛选,因其简便易行、易于使用和良好的记录而被广泛使用。技术进步和传染病应用的迫切需求改变了单 B 细胞筛选的模式,提高了通量,减少了时间和人力,最终实现了快速鉴定具有所需生物和生物物理特性的单克隆抗体。在此,我们概述了传统和新兴的单 B 细胞筛选方法,并强调了它们潜在的优缺点。我们还详细介绍了创新技术(包括微型化、微流控、多路复用和深度测序)对近期鉴定传染病应用的广谱中和抗体的影响。总之,2019 年冠状病毒病(COVID-19)大流行为提高单克隆抗体发现的效率注入了新的活力,导致创新抗体发现方法被广泛应用于治疗各种传染病和病理状况。
{"title":"Monoclonal Antibody Generation Using Single B Cell Screening for Treating Infectious Diseases.","authors":"John S Schardt, Neelan S Sivaneri, Peter M Tessier","doi":"10.1007/s40259-024-00667-0","DOIUrl":"10.1007/s40259-024-00667-0","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The screening of antigen-specific B cells has been pivotal for biotherapeutic development for over four decades. Conventional antibody discovery strategies, including hybridoma technology and single B cell screening, remain widely used based on their simplicity, accessibility, and proven track record. Technological advances and the urgent demand for infectious disease applications have shifted paradigms in single B cell screening, resulting in increased throughput and decreased time and labor, ultimately enabling the rapid identification of monoclonal antibodies with desired biological and biophysical properties. Herein, we provide an overview of conventional and emergent single B cell screening approaches and highlight their potential strengths and weaknesses. We also detail the impact of innovative technologies-including miniaturization, microfluidics, multiplexing, and deep sequencing-on the recent identification of broadly neutralizing antibodies for infectious disease applications. Overall, the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic has reinvigorated efforts to improve the efficiency of monoclonal antibody discovery, resulting in the broad application of innovative antibody discovery methodologies for treating a myriad of infectious diseases and pathological conditions.</p>","PeriodicalId":9022,"journal":{"name":"BioDrugs","volume":" ","pages":"477-486"},"PeriodicalIF":5.4,"publicationDate":"2024-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11645890/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141490795","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-05-01Epub Date: 2024-03-23DOI: 10.1007/s40259-024-00650-9
Wei Wang, Ying Liu, Zuo-Bin Zhu, Kun Pang, Jing-Kai Wang, Jun Gu, Zhen-Bei Li, Jian Wang, Zhen-Duo Shi, Cong-Hui Han
Erectile dysfunction (ED) is a common clinical condition that mainly affects men aged over 40 years. Various causes contribute to the progression of ED, including pelvic nerve injury, diabetes, metabolic syndrome, age, Peyronie's disease, smoking, and psychological disorders. Current treatments for ED are limited to symptom relief and do not address the root cause. Stem cells, with their powerful ability to proliferate and differentiate, are a promising approach for the treatment of male ED and are gradually gaining widespread attention. Current uses for treating ED have been studied primarily in experimental animals, with most studies observing improvements in erectile quality as well as improvements in erectile tissue. However, research on stem cell therapy for human ED is still limited. This article summarizes the recent literature on basic stem cell research on ED, including cavernous nerve injury, aging, diabetes, and sclerosing penile disease, and describes mechanisms of action and therapeutic effects of various stem cell therapies in experimental animals. Stem cells are also believed to interact with host tissue in a paracrine manner, and improved function can be supported through both implantation and paracrine factors. To date, stem cells have shown some preliminary promising results in animal and human models of ED.
勃起功能障碍(ED)是一种常见的临床症状,主要影响 40 岁以上的男性。导致 ED 的原因多种多样,包括骨盆神经损伤、糖尿病、代谢综合征、年龄、佩罗尼氏病、吸烟和心理障碍。目前治疗阳痿的方法仅限于缓解症状,并不能从根本上解决问题。干细胞具有强大的增殖和分化能力,是治疗男性性功能障碍的一种很有前景的方法,并逐渐受到广泛关注。目前用于治疗ED的干细胞主要在实验动物中进行研究,大多数研究观察到勃起质量的改善以及勃起组织的改善。然而,干细胞治疗人类ED的研究仍然有限。本文总结了干细胞治疗ED基础研究的最新文献,包括海绵体神经损伤、衰老、糖尿病和阴茎硬结症,并介绍了各种干细胞疗法在实验动物中的作用机制和治疗效果。干细胞还被认为以旁分泌方式与宿主组织相互作用,通过植入和旁分泌因子可支持功能的改善。迄今为止,干细胞已在ED的动物和人体模型中显示出一些初步的有希望的结果。
{"title":"Research Advances in Stem Cell Therapy for Erectile Dysfunction.","authors":"Wei Wang, Ying Liu, Zuo-Bin Zhu, Kun Pang, Jing-Kai Wang, Jun Gu, Zhen-Bei Li, Jian Wang, Zhen-Duo Shi, Cong-Hui Han","doi":"10.1007/s40259-024-00650-9","DOIUrl":"10.1007/s40259-024-00650-9","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Erectile dysfunction (ED) is a common clinical condition that mainly affects men aged over 40 years. Various causes contribute to the progression of ED, including pelvic nerve injury, diabetes, metabolic syndrome, age, Peyronie's disease, smoking, and psychological disorders. Current treatments for ED are limited to symptom relief and do not address the root cause. Stem cells, with their powerful ability to proliferate and differentiate, are a promising approach for the treatment of male ED and are gradually gaining widespread attention. Current uses for treating ED have been studied primarily in experimental animals, with most studies observing improvements in erectile quality as well as improvements in erectile tissue. However, research on stem cell therapy for human ED is still limited. This article summarizes the recent literature on basic stem cell research on ED, including cavernous nerve injury, aging, diabetes, and sclerosing penile disease, and describes mechanisms of action and therapeutic effects of various stem cell therapies in experimental animals. Stem cells are also believed to interact with host tissue in a paracrine manner, and improved function can be supported through both implantation and paracrine factors. To date, stem cells have shown some preliminary promising results in animal and human models of ED.</p>","PeriodicalId":9022,"journal":{"name":"BioDrugs","volume":" ","pages":"353-367"},"PeriodicalIF":5.4,"publicationDate":"2024-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11055746/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"140193292","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-05-01Epub Date: 2024-02-25DOI: 10.1007/s40259-023-00642-1
Khalid A Alnaqbi, Nasra Al Adhoubi, Sara Aldallal, Samar Al Emadi, Adeeba Al-Herz, Amin M El Shamy, Suad Hannawi, Mohammed A Omair, Sahar A Saad, Tore K Kvien
<p><strong>Background: </strong>Though biologic agents have significantly improved the treatment of inflammatory arthritis (rheumatoid arthritis, psoriatic arthritis, and axial spondyloarthritis), high costs, stringent regulations, strict reimbursement criteria, and existing patents have limited patient access to treatments. While being highly similar in quality, safety, and efficacy to biologic reference products, biosimilars can reduce the financial burden and prevent underutilization of medication.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>The objective of this initiative was to develop an evidence-based consensus of overarching principles and recommendations aimed at standardizing the use of biosimilars in treating inflammatory arthritis in the Gulf region.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A task force of practicing rheumatologists, a clinical pharmacist, a health economist, patients, regulators, and payors from across the Gulf region developed recommendations and overarching principles based on the outputs of a systematic literature review conducted to address Patient-Intervention-Comparison-Outcome (PICO) questions specific to key challenges regarding the use of biosimilars for the treatment of inflammatory arthritis in the region. As the data before 2017 have been previously reviewed in another publication, the current review focused on data published between January 2017 and August 2022 (PROSPERO ID CRD42022364002). Consensus on each statement required a level of agreement of 70% or greater.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Consensus was reached for five overarching principles and nine recommendations by the task force. The principles emphasize the importance of improving the awareness, understanding, and perception of biosimilars, as well as the need for regulated regional real-world data generation and protocols to make biosimilars a viable and affordable treatment option for all patients. The consensus recommendations advocate the need for shared treatment decisions between rheumatologists and patients when considering biosimilars. They further recommend that confirmation of a biosimilar's efficacy and safety in a single indication is sufficient for extrapolation to other diseases for which the reference product has been approved. Finally, there is a need for pharmacovigilance and national health policies governing the adoption and prescription of biosimilars in clinical practice across the region.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>These are the first consensus recommendations for the Gulf region based on a systematic literature review and Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-analysis (PRISMA) guidelines, integrating clinical evidence with clinical expertise to optimize decision making for the use of biosimilars in patients with inflammatory arthritis. They were formulated based on predominantly international data because of the limited regional data and therefore can be generalized to serve as recommendations for healthcar
{"title":"Consensus-Based Overarching Principles and Recommendations on the Use of Biosimilars in the Treatment of Inflammatory Arthritis in the Gulf Region.","authors":"Khalid A Alnaqbi, Nasra Al Adhoubi, Sara Aldallal, Samar Al Emadi, Adeeba Al-Herz, Amin M El Shamy, Suad Hannawi, Mohammed A Omair, Sahar A Saad, Tore K Kvien","doi":"10.1007/s40259-023-00642-1","DOIUrl":"10.1007/s40259-023-00642-1","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Though biologic agents have significantly improved the treatment of inflammatory arthritis (rheumatoid arthritis, psoriatic arthritis, and axial spondyloarthritis), high costs, stringent regulations, strict reimbursement criteria, and existing patents have limited patient access to treatments. While being highly similar in quality, safety, and efficacy to biologic reference products, biosimilars can reduce the financial burden and prevent underutilization of medication.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>The objective of this initiative was to develop an evidence-based consensus of overarching principles and recommendations aimed at standardizing the use of biosimilars in treating inflammatory arthritis in the Gulf region.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A task force of practicing rheumatologists, a clinical pharmacist, a health economist, patients, regulators, and payors from across the Gulf region developed recommendations and overarching principles based on the outputs of a systematic literature review conducted to address Patient-Intervention-Comparison-Outcome (PICO) questions specific to key challenges regarding the use of biosimilars for the treatment of inflammatory arthritis in the region. As the data before 2017 have been previously reviewed in another publication, the current review focused on data published between January 2017 and August 2022 (PROSPERO ID CRD42022364002). Consensus on each statement required a level of agreement of 70% or greater.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Consensus was reached for five overarching principles and nine recommendations by the task force. The principles emphasize the importance of improving the awareness, understanding, and perception of biosimilars, as well as the need for regulated regional real-world data generation and protocols to make biosimilars a viable and affordable treatment option for all patients. The consensus recommendations advocate the need for shared treatment decisions between rheumatologists and patients when considering biosimilars. They further recommend that confirmation of a biosimilar's efficacy and safety in a single indication is sufficient for extrapolation to other diseases for which the reference product has been approved. Finally, there is a need for pharmacovigilance and national health policies governing the adoption and prescription of biosimilars in clinical practice across the region.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>These are the first consensus recommendations for the Gulf region based on a systematic literature review and Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-analysis (PRISMA) guidelines, integrating clinical evidence with clinical expertise to optimize decision making for the use of biosimilars in patients with inflammatory arthritis. They were formulated based on predominantly international data because of the limited regional data and therefore can be generalized to serve as recommendations for healthcar","PeriodicalId":9022,"journal":{"name":"BioDrugs","volume":" ","pages":"449-463"},"PeriodicalIF":6.8,"publicationDate":"2024-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11055752/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"139943813","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}