BioDrugs最新文献

Chimeric antigen receptor T cell therapy has been established in the treatment of various B cell malignancies. However, translating this therapeutic effect to treat solid tumors has been challenging because of their inter-tumoral as well as intratumoral heterogeneity and immunosuppressive microenvironment. Local interventions, such as surgery, radiotherapy, local ablation, and locoregional drug delivery, can enhance chimeric antigen receptor T cell therapy in solid tumors by improving tumor infiltration and reducing systemic toxicities. Additionally, ablation and radiotherapy have proven to (re-)activate systemic immune responses via abscopal effects and reprogram the tumor microenvironment on a physical, cellular, and chemical level. This review highlights the potential synergy of the combined approaches to overcome barriers of chimeric antigen receptor T cell therapy and summarizes recent studies that may pave the way for new treatment regimens.

Mucopolysaccharidosis type II (MPS II) is a rare, pediatric, neurometabolic disorder due to the lack of activity of the lysosomal hydrolase iduronate 2-sulfatase (IDS), normally degrading heparan sulfate and dermatan sulfate within cell lysosomes. The deficit of activity is caused by mutations affecting the IDS gene, leading to the pathological accumulation of both glycosaminoglycans in the lysosomal compartment and in the extracellular matrix of most body districts. Although a continuum of clinical phenotypes is described, two main forms are commonly recognized-attenuated and severe-the latter being characterized by an earlier and faster clinical progression and by a progressive impairment of central nervous system (CNS) functions. However, attenuated forms have also been recently described as presenting some neurological involvement, although less deep, such as deficits of attention and hearing loss. The main treatment for the disease is represented by enzyme replacement therapy (ERT), applied in several countries since 2006, which, albeit showing partial efficacy on some peripheral organs, exhibited a very poor efficacy on bones and heart, and a total inefficacy on CNS impairment, due to the inability of the recombinant enzyme to cross the blood-brain barrier (BBB). Together with ERT, whose design enhancements, performed in the last few years, allowed a possible brain penetration of the drug through the BBB, other therapeutic approaches aimed at targeting CNS involvement in MPS II were proposed and evaluated in the last decades, such as intrathecal ERT, intracerebroventricular ERT, ex vivo gene therapy, or adeno-associated viral vector (AAV) gene therapy. The aim of this review is to summarize the main clinical aspects of MPS II in addition to current therapeutic options, with particular emphasis on the neurological ones and on the main CNS-targeted therapeutic approaches explored through the years.

Background: Genetic substrate reduction therapy (gSRT), which involves the use of nucleic acids to downregulate the genes involved in the biosynthesis of storage substances, has been investigated in the treatment of lysosomal storage diseases (LSDs).

Objective: To analyze the application of gSRT to the treatment of LSDs, identifying the silencing tools and delivery systems used, and the main challenges for its development and clinical translation, highlighting the contribution of nanotechnology to overcome them.

Methods: A systematic review following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) reporting guidelines was performed. PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science databases were used for searching terms related to LSDs and gene-silencing strategies and tools.

Results: Fabry, Gaucher, and Pompe diseases and mucopolysaccharidoses I and III are the only LSDs for which gSRT has been studied, siRNA and lipid nanoparticles being the silencing strategy and the delivery system most frequently employed, respectively. Only in one recently published study was CRISPR/Cas9 applied to treat Fabry disease. Specific tissue targeting, availability of relevant cell and animal LSD models, and the rare disease condition are the main challenges with gSRT for the treatment of these diseases. Out of the 11 studies identified, only two gSRT studies were evaluated in animal models.

Conclusions: Nucleic acid therapies are expanding the clinical tools and therapies currently available for LSDs. Recent advances in CRISPR/Cas9 technology and the growing impact of nanotechnology are expected to boost the clinical translation of gSRT in the near future, and not only for LSDs.

Background: Tocilizumab prevents the clinical worsening of chronic active antibody-mediated rejection (CAAMR) in kidney transplant recipients. Following a global shortage of the intravenous pharmaceutical form in 2022, patients were switched from monthly intravenous administration of 8 mg/kg to weekly subcutaneous injection of 162 mg, raising the question of bioequivalence between these schemes of administration.

Aims: We aimed to compare the areas under the curve (AUC) of tocilizumab in virtual simulations of populations treated with the two administration schemes and to identify the covariates that could contribute to pharmacokinetic variability of tocilizumab in kidney transplant patients with CAAMR who received tocilizumab as salvage treatment.

Methods: This retrospective monocentric study included 43 kidney transplant patients (202 tocilizumab concentrations) with CAAMR treated with intravenous or subcutaneous tocilizumab between December 2020 and January 2023. We developed a population pharmacokinetic model using nonlinear mixed effects modeling and identified the covariates that could contribute to tocilizumab AUC variability. Monte Carlo simulations were then performed to assess the subcutaneous and intravenous tocilizumab AUC for 0-28 days (M1), 56-84 days (M3), 140-168 days (M6), and 308-336 days (M12). Bioequivalence was defined by SC/IV AUC geometric mean ratios (GMRs) between 0.80 and 1.25.

Results: A two-compartment model with parallel linear and nonlinear elimination best described the concentration-time data. Significant covariates for tocilizumab clearance were body weight, urinary albumin-to-creatinine ratio (ACR), and inflammation status [C-reactive protein (CRP) ≥ 5 mg/L]. The GMR values and their 90% confidence intervals at M3, M6, and M12 were within the 0.8-1.25 margin for equivalence. Conversely, the 90% prediction intervals of the GMR were much wider than the 90% confidence intervals and did not fall within 0.8 and 1.25.

Conclusions: From month 3 of treatment, the subcutaneous and intravenous tocilizumab administration schemes provided average bioequivalent pharmacokinetic exposure at the population level but not at the individual level. Body weight, inflammation, ACR, and administration scheme should be considered to personalize the dose of tocilizumab for patients with CAAMR. Further studies are required to determine the target of tocilizumab exposure in kidney transplant patients with CAAMR.

Insulin icodec (AWIQLI^®) is an ultra-long-acting basal insulin analogue that is being developed by Novo Nordisk for the treatment of diabetes mellitus. Administered once weekly as a subcutaneous injection, insulin icodec is designed to improve treatment adherence and glycaemic control relative to once-daily insulin analogues. On 7 March 2024, insulin icodec was approved in Switzerland for the treatment of diabetes mellitus in adults. Insulin icodec was approved in Canada on 12 March 2024 for the once-weekly treatment of adults with diabetes mellitus to improve glycaemic control and received EU approval in May 2024 for the treatment of diabetes mellitus in adults. This article summarizes the milestones in the development of insulin icodec leading to this first approval for diabetes mellitus.

Background and objective: Biosimilars represent an opportunity to realise savings against the costs of innovative medicines. Despite efforts made by stakeholders, there are numerous barriers to the uptake of biosimilars. To realise the promise of biosimilars reducing costs, barriers must be identified, understood, and overcome, and enablers magnified. The aim of this systematic review is to summarise the enablers and barriers affecting uptake of biosimilars through the application of a classification system to organise them into healthcare professional (HCP), patient, or systemic categories.

Methods: A systematic literature search was performed in PubMed, Scopus, CINAHL, eConlit, and Embase. Included were primary research studies published in English between Jan 2017 through June 2023 focused on enablers and barriers affecting uptake of biosimilars. Excluded studies comprised comparisons of biosimilar efficacy and safety versus the reference biologic. One reviewer extracted data that included classification of barriers or enablers, the sub-classification, and the identification of the degree of agency associated with the actor through their role and associations as a mediator within their network, through the application of Actor Network Theory. The data were validated by a second reviewer (PV).

Results: Of the 94 studies included, 59 were cross-sectional, 20 were qualitative research, 12 were cohort studies, and three were economic evaluations. Within the review, 51 of the studies included HCP populations and 35 included patients. Policies and guidelines were the most cited group of enablers, overall. Systemic enablers were addressed in 29 studies. For patients, the most frequently cited enabler was positive framing of a biosimilar, while for HCPs, cost benefit was the most frequently noted enabler. The most frequently discussed systemic barrier to biosimilar acceptance was lack of effective policies or guidelines, followed by lack of financial incentives, while the most significant barriers for HCPs and patients, respectively, were their lack of general knowledge about biosimilars and concerns about safety and efficacy. Systemic actors and HCPs most frequently acted with broad degree of agency as mediators, while patient most frequently acted with a narrow degree of agency as mediators within their networks.

Conclusions: Barriers and enablers affecting uptake of biosimilars are interconnected within networks, and can be divided into systemic, HCP, and patient categories. Understanding the agency of actors within networks may allow for more comprehensive and effective approaches. Systemic enablers in the form of policies appear to be the most effective overall levers in affecting uptake of biosimilars, with policy makers advised to give careful consideration to appropriately educating HCPs and positively framing biosimilars for patients.

Inflammatory bowel disease remains a difficult disease to effectively treat, especially fistulizing Crohn's disease. Perianal fistulas in the setting of Crohn's disease remain an area of unmet need with significant morbidity in this patient population. Up to one third of Crohn's patients will have perianal fistulizing disease and current medical and surgical interventions are of limited efficacy. Thus, most patients experience significant morbidity, narcotic use, and loss of employment and end up with multiple surgical interventions. Mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) have shown efficacy in phase 3 clinical trials, but considerable infrastructure challenges make MSCs limited with regard to scalability in clinical practice. Extracellular vesicles, being derived from MSCs and capturing the secretome functionality of MSCs, offer similar physiological utility regarding mechanism, while also providing an off the shelf regenerative medicine product that could be widely used in daily clinical practice.

Background: Rituximab with cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, and prednisone (R-CHOP) is one of the first line treatments for diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL). Rituximab comprises most of the treatment cost for this regimen; therefore, biosimilars, such as rituximab-abbs are crucial to provide affordable care. Although rituximab-abbs was studied primarily in follicular lymphoma, the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approved this drug for all indications of the reference product on the basis of extrapolation. Effectiveness and safety data surrounding the use of rituximab-abbs in DLBCL is lacking.

Objective: To evaluate the effectiveness and safety of rituximab-abbs and reference product rituximab as R-CHOP treatment for patients with DLBCL.

Patients and methods: This noninferiority (NI) study compared the 2-year overall survival (OS), overall response rate (ORR), and incidence of adverse events (AEs) between rituximab-abbs and its reference product (RP) in R-CHOP among adult patients with newly diagnosed DLBCL. The study inclusion period was from 1 January 2019 to 31 December 2020. Analyses were performed on the basis of a noninferiority lower limit of 10% for OS and ORR, and an upper limit of 10% for serious AEs.

Results: There were 240 patients who received RP rituximab, while 295 patients received rituximab-abbs. The cohort had a mean age of 63.7±12.2 years and 43% were female. The 2-year OS was 81.0% and 79.6% (NI p < 0.01) while the ORR was 80.0% and 69.6% (NI p < 0.01), among the rituximab-abbs and rituximab groups, respectively. The incidence of infusion reaction AEs (NI p < 0.01) and noninfusion reaction AEs (NI p < 0.01) also met noninferiority.

Conclusions: We demonstrated that rituximab-abbs was noninferior to rituximab in both effectiveness and safety among patients receiving R-CHOP for DLBCL in this study. Long-term follow-up would be needed to confirm these results.