Pub Date : 2024-11-01Epub Date: 2024-09-30DOI: 10.1007/s40259-024-00671-4
Krzysztof Selmaj, Karsten Roth, Josef Höfler, Klaus Vitzithum, Rafał Derlacz, Oliver von Richter, Cyrill Hornuss, Johann Poetzl, Barry Singer, Laura Jacobs
A biosimilar medicine is a successor to a reference ('originator'/'original-brand') biologic medicine brought to market once the patent and exclusive marketing rights for the reference have expired. Biosimilar natalizumab (PB006 [biosim-NTZ]; developed by Polpharma Biologics S.A. and marketed globally as Tyruko®; Sandoz) has been developed as a successor to reference natalizumab (Tysabri® [ref-NTZ]; Biogen) and is the first US Food and Drug Administration (FDA)-approved and European Medicines Agency (EMA)-approved biosimilar in neurology. As per the FDA and EMA indications for ref-NTZ, biosim-NTZ is approved to treat relapsing forms of multiple sclerosis (USA, EU) and Crohn's disease (USA only). Approval of biosim-NTZ was based on the 'totality of evidence', a comprehensive body of data collected during the development process, demonstrating similarity to its reference medicine. The foundational step of demonstrating structural and functional similarity between biosim-NTZ and ref-NTZ confirmed identical primary and indistinguishable higher order structures, as well as matching binding affinity to α4β1/α4β7 integrins. Following the confirmation of matching structure and function, pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic similarity of biosim-NTZ to ref-NTZ in healthy subjects was demonstrated, with no clinically meaningful differences identified in safety and immunogenicity. A comparative, double-blind, randomized study (Antelope) was also conducted in patients with relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis and demonstrated matching efficacy, safety, and immunogenicity with no clinically meaningful differences between biosim-NTZ and ref-NTZ. This review presents the totality of evidence that confirmed the biosimilarity of biosimilar natalizumab to its reference medicine, which supported its approval by the FDA and the EMA. [Graphical plain language summary available].
生物仿制药是参照药("原研药"/"原品牌")的后继药,在参照药的专利和独家销售权到期后推向市场。生物仿制药纳他珠单抗(PB006 [biosim-NTZ];由 Polpharma Biologics S.A.开发,以 Tyruko® 在全球销售;Sandoz)是作为纳他珠单抗参照药(Tysabri® [ref-NTZ];Biogen)的后继药物开发的,也是神经病学领域第一个获得美国食品药品管理局(FDA)批准和欧洲药品管理局(EMA)批准的生物仿制药。根据 FDA 和 EMA 对 ref-NTZ 的适应症规定,生物仿制-NTZ 可用于治疗复发性多发性硬化症(美国、欧盟)和克罗恩病(仅限美国)。生物仿制-NTZ 的批准基于 "全面证据",即在开发过程中收集的大量数据,这些数据证明了它与参照药物的相似性。证明生物仿制药-NTZ 和 ref-NTZ 结构和功能相似性的基础步骤是确认两者具有相同的初级结构和无差别的高阶结构,以及与 α4β1/α4β7 整合素匹配的结合亲和力。在确认了结构和功能的匹配性之后,在健康受试者体内,生物 Sim-NTZ 与 ref-NTZ 的药代动力学/药效学相似性也得到了证实,在安全性和免疫原性方面没有发现有临床意义的差异。此外,还在复发缓解型多发性硬化症患者中进行了一项双盲随机对比研究(羚羊),结果表明生物 Sim-NTZ 与 ref-NTZ 的疗效、安全性和免疫原性相匹配,没有发现有临床意义的差异。本综述介绍了证实生物仿制药纳他珠单抗与其参比药物具有生物相似性的全部证据,这些证据为其获得 FDA 和 EMA 批准提供了支持。[提供图形化简明语言摘要]。
{"title":"Introducing the Biosimilar Paradigm to Neurology: The Totality of Evidence for the First Biosimilar Natalizumab.","authors":"Krzysztof Selmaj, Karsten Roth, Josef Höfler, Klaus Vitzithum, Rafał Derlacz, Oliver von Richter, Cyrill Hornuss, Johann Poetzl, Barry Singer, Laura Jacobs","doi":"10.1007/s40259-024-00671-4","DOIUrl":"10.1007/s40259-024-00671-4","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>A biosimilar medicine is a successor to a reference ('originator'/'original-brand') biologic medicine brought to market once the patent and exclusive marketing rights for the reference have expired. Biosimilar natalizumab (PB006 [biosim-NTZ]; developed by Polpharma Biologics S.A. and marketed globally as Tyruko<sup>®</sup>; Sandoz) has been developed as a successor to reference natalizumab (Tysabri<sup>®</sup> [ref-NTZ]; Biogen) and is the first US Food and Drug Administration (FDA)-approved and European Medicines Agency (EMA)-approved biosimilar in neurology. As per the FDA and EMA indications for ref-NTZ, biosim-NTZ is approved to treat relapsing forms of multiple sclerosis (USA, EU) and Crohn's disease (USA only). Approval of biosim-NTZ was based on the 'totality of evidence', a comprehensive body of data collected during the development process, demonstrating similarity to its reference medicine. The foundational step of demonstrating structural and functional similarity between biosim-NTZ and ref-NTZ confirmed identical primary and indistinguishable higher order structures, as well as matching binding affinity to α4β1/α4β7 integrins. Following the confirmation of matching structure and function, pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic similarity of biosim-NTZ to ref-NTZ in healthy subjects was demonstrated, with no clinically meaningful differences identified in safety and immunogenicity. A comparative, double-blind, randomized study (Antelope) was also conducted in patients with relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis and demonstrated matching efficacy, safety, and immunogenicity with no clinically meaningful differences between biosim-NTZ and ref-NTZ. This review presents the totality of evidence that confirmed the biosimilarity of biosimilar natalizumab to its reference medicine, which supported its approval by the FDA and the EMA. [Graphical plain language summary available].</p>","PeriodicalId":9022,"journal":{"name":"BioDrugs","volume":" ","pages":"755-767"},"PeriodicalIF":5.4,"publicationDate":"2024-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11530514/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142341155","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-11-01Epub Date: 2024-09-30DOI: 10.1007/s40259-024-00678-x
Malte Lenders, Elise Raphaela Menke, Eva Brand
Aim: Current recommendations for Fabry disease include α-galactosidase A (AGAL) activity measurements to assess the biochemical response in migalastat-treated patients. Owing to contradictory data from laboratories, we aimed to analyze why AGAL activity measures from dried blood spots (DBS) often fail to detect migalastat-mediated enzymatic activity increases in treated patients.
Methods: 43 patients with 58 visits under migalastat were consecutively recruited. Enzymatic AGAL activities were measured from DBS and peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs). Migalastat concentrations in sera were determined using modified serum-mediated inhibition assays to assess Cmax and serum half-life. Results were set in relation to the time of last migalastat intake and blood sampling to assess an optimal timepoint for AGAL activity measures.
Results: DBS-based AGAL activity measurements of 21 (42.0%) amenable patients were below the limit of detection. Serum samples from migalastat-treated patients showed significant AGAL inhibition, depending on the time between migalastat intake and blood sampling (r2 = 0.8140, p < 0.0001). Migalastat concentrations were determined in serum samples confirming a Cmax at 3 h and a serum half-life of 4 h. At 24 h after intake, migalastat clearance was significantly associated with renal function (r2 = 0.3135, p = 0.0102). Enzymatic AGAL activities were higher in samples from DBS and PBMCs 24 h after migalastat intake (both p < 0.05).
Conclusion: The optimal time for enzymatic AGAL activity measurement in migalastat-treated patients appears to be 24 h after the last migalastat intake. Since migalastat is a competitive inhibitor of AGAL, enzymatic AGAL activity measurements should be better performed from PBMCs to reduce migalastat-mediated interferences.
{"title":"Biochemical Amenability in Fabry Patients Under Chaperone Therapy-How and When to Test?","authors":"Malte Lenders, Elise Raphaela Menke, Eva Brand","doi":"10.1007/s40259-024-00678-x","DOIUrl":"10.1007/s40259-024-00678-x","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aim: </strong>Current recommendations for Fabry disease include α-galactosidase A (AGAL) activity measurements to assess the biochemical response in migalastat-treated patients. Owing to contradictory data from laboratories, we aimed to analyze why AGAL activity measures from dried blood spots (DBS) often fail to detect migalastat-mediated enzymatic activity increases in treated patients.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>43 patients with 58 visits under migalastat were consecutively recruited. Enzymatic AGAL activities were measured from DBS and peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs). Migalastat concentrations in sera were determined using modified serum-mediated inhibition assays to assess C<sub>max</sub> and serum half-life. Results were set in relation to the time of last migalastat intake and blood sampling to assess an optimal timepoint for AGAL activity measures.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>DBS-based AGAL activity measurements of 21 (42.0%) amenable patients were below the limit of detection. Serum samples from migalastat-treated patients showed significant AGAL inhibition, depending on the time between migalastat intake and blood sampling (r<sup>2</sup> = 0.8140, p < 0.0001). Migalastat concentrations were determined in serum samples confirming a C<sub>max</sub> at 3 h and a serum half-life of 4 h. At 24 h after intake, migalastat clearance was significantly associated with renal function (r<sup>2</sup> = 0.3135, p = 0.0102). Enzymatic AGAL activities were higher in samples from DBS and PBMCs 24 h after migalastat intake (both p < 0.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The optimal time for enzymatic AGAL activity measurement in migalastat-treated patients appears to be 24 h after the last migalastat intake. Since migalastat is a competitive inhibitor of AGAL, enzymatic AGAL activity measurements should be better performed from PBMCs to reduce migalastat-mediated interferences.</p>","PeriodicalId":9022,"journal":{"name":"BioDrugs","volume":" ","pages":"845-854"},"PeriodicalIF":5.4,"publicationDate":"2024-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11530494/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142341154","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-11-01Epub Date: 2024-10-15DOI: 10.1007/s40259-024-00685-y
Ferda Cevikbas, Alison Ward, Karen A Veverka
Introduction: Eblasakimab, a first-in-class monoclonal antibody with a unique mechanism to target the interleukin (IL)-13 receptor alpha 1 (IL-13Rα1), inhibits IL-4/IL-13 signaling in the pathophysiology of atopic dermatitis (AD). This study investigates the impact of eblasakimab on type 2 inflammatory biomarkers in patients with moderate-to-severe AD.
Methods: A double‑blind, multiple ascending dose, phase Ib study evaluated the effect of eblasakimab (200, 400, 600 mg) or placebo administered subcutaneously once weekly for 8 weeks in patients with moderate‑to‑severe AD. Serum levels of thymus and activation-regulated chemokine (TARC), total immunoglobulin E (IgE), and lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) were assessed.
Results: Eblasakimab suppressed TARC, IgE, and LDH in the 400-mg and 600-mg groups over 8 weeks of treatment. Patients in the 400-mg and 600-mg groups experienced a reduction of 72.8% (p = 0.004) and 62.9% (p = 0.003), respectively, for TARC, 35.1% (p = 0.006) and 20.9% (not significant; NS), respectively, for IgE, and 24.6% (NS) and 23.1% (NS), respectively, for LDH between baseline and Week 8. Reduction in serum TARC in the 400-mg group was significantly greater than placebo as early as Week 1, whereas reductions in total IgE were more gradual. Serum TARC and total IgE remained suppressed in the 400-mg and 600-mg eblasakimab groups for 4-6 weeks following the last administered dose.
Conclusion: The effect of eblasakimab on circulating AD‑associated biomarker levels was accompanied by improvements in signs and symptoms of AD, consistent with the inhibition of IL-13 and IL-4 signaling via the type 2 receptor.
{"title":"Eblasakimab, an Anti-IL‑13Rα1 Antibody, Reduces Atopy-Associated Serum Biomarkers in Moderate‑to‑Severe Atopic Dermatitis.","authors":"Ferda Cevikbas, Alison Ward, Karen A Veverka","doi":"10.1007/s40259-024-00685-y","DOIUrl":"10.1007/s40259-024-00685-y","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Eblasakimab, a first-in-class monoclonal antibody with a unique mechanism to target the interleukin (IL)-13 receptor alpha 1 (IL-13Rα1), inhibits IL-4/IL-13 signaling in the pathophysiology of atopic dermatitis (AD). This study investigates the impact of eblasakimab on type 2 inflammatory biomarkers in patients with moderate-to-severe AD.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A double‑blind, multiple ascending dose, phase Ib study evaluated the effect of eblasakimab (200, 400, 600 mg) or placebo administered subcutaneously once weekly for 8 weeks in patients with moderate‑to‑severe AD. Serum levels of thymus and activation-regulated chemokine (TARC), total immunoglobulin E (IgE), and lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) were assessed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Eblasakimab suppressed TARC, IgE, and LDH in the 400-mg and 600-mg groups over 8 weeks of treatment. Patients in the 400-mg and 600-mg groups experienced a reduction of 72.8% (p = 0.004) and 62.9% (p = 0.003), respectively, for TARC, 35.1% (p = 0.006) and 20.9% (not significant; NS), respectively, for IgE, and 24.6% (NS) and 23.1% (NS), respectively, for LDH between baseline and Week 8. Reduction in serum TARC in the 400-mg group was significantly greater than placebo as early as Week 1, whereas reductions in total IgE were more gradual. Serum TARC and total IgE remained suppressed in the 400-mg and 600-mg eblasakimab groups for 4-6 weeks following the last administered dose.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The effect of eblasakimab on circulating AD‑associated biomarker levels was accompanied by improvements in signs and symptoms of AD, consistent with the inhibition of IL-13 and IL-4 signaling via the type 2 receptor.</p><p><strong>Trial registration number: </strong>NCT04090229.</p>","PeriodicalId":9022,"journal":{"name":"BioDrugs","volume":" ","pages":"821-830"},"PeriodicalIF":5.4,"publicationDate":"2024-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11530511/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142457392","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
The beneficial effects of polyethylene glycol (PEG)-conjugated therapeutics, such as increased half-life, solubility, stability, and decreased immunogenicity, have been well described. There have been concerns, however, about adverse outcomes with their use, but understanding of those adverse outcomes is still relatively limited. The present study aimed to characterize adverse outcomes associated with PEGylation of protein-based therapeutics on immunogenicity, pharmacologic properties, and safety. A targeted review of English language articles published from 1990 to September 29, 2023, was conducted. Of the 29 studies included in this review, 18 reported adverse safety outcomes such as hematologic complications, hepatic toxicity, injection site reactions, arthralgia, nausea, infections, grade 3 or 4 adverse events (AEs), and AE-related discontinuations and dose modifications. Fifteen studies reported immunogenicity-related outcomes, such as the prevalence of pre-existing antibodies to PEG, treatment-emergent antibody response, and hypersensitivity reactions to PEGylated drugs. Seven studies reported pharmacological outcomes such as increased clearance and reduced activity in response to PEGylated drugs. This review aims to contribute to a balanced view of PEGylated therapies by summarizing the adverse outcomes or lack of benefit associated with PEGylated therapeutics reported in the literature. We identified several studies characterizing adverse outcomes, pharmacological effects, and immunogenicity associated with the use of PEGylated therapeutics. Our findings suggest that using PEGylated therapeutics may require careful monitoring for adverse safety outcomes, including screening and monitoring for pre-existing antibodies and those induced in response to PEGylated therapy, as well as monitoring and adjusting the dosing of PEGylated therapeutics.
{"title":"Adverse Impacts of PEGylated Protein Therapeutics: A Targeted Literature Review.","authors":"Chae Sung Lee, Yogesh Kulkarni, Vicki Pierre, Manish Maski, Christoph Wanner","doi":"10.1007/s40259-024-00684-z","DOIUrl":"10.1007/s40259-024-00684-z","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The beneficial effects of polyethylene glycol (PEG)-conjugated therapeutics, such as increased half-life, solubility, stability, and decreased immunogenicity, have been well described. There have been concerns, however, about adverse outcomes with their use, but understanding of those adverse outcomes is still relatively limited. The present study aimed to characterize adverse outcomes associated with PEGylation of protein-based therapeutics on immunogenicity, pharmacologic properties, and safety. A targeted review of English language articles published from 1990 to September 29, 2023, was conducted. Of the 29 studies included in this review, 18 reported adverse safety outcomes such as hematologic complications, hepatic toxicity, injection site reactions, arthralgia, nausea, infections, grade 3 or 4 adverse events (AEs), and AE-related discontinuations and dose modifications. Fifteen studies reported immunogenicity-related outcomes, such as the prevalence of pre-existing antibodies to PEG, treatment-emergent antibody response, and hypersensitivity reactions to PEGylated drugs. Seven studies reported pharmacological outcomes such as increased clearance and reduced activity in response to PEGylated drugs. This review aims to contribute to a balanced view of PEGylated therapies by summarizing the adverse outcomes or lack of benefit associated with PEGylated therapeutics reported in the literature. We identified several studies characterizing adverse outcomes, pharmacological effects, and immunogenicity associated with the use of PEGylated therapeutics. Our findings suggest that using PEGylated therapeutics may require careful monitoring for adverse safety outcomes, including screening and monitoring for pre-existing antibodies and those induced in response to PEGylated therapy, as well as monitoring and adjusting the dosing of PEGylated therapeutics.</p>","PeriodicalId":9022,"journal":{"name":"BioDrugs","volume":" ","pages":"795-819"},"PeriodicalIF":5.4,"publicationDate":"2024-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11530478/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142457391","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Background and objectives: Biosimilars are cost-effective alternatives to reference products for patients with inflammatory bowel diseases (IBD) and chronic inflammatory rheumatic diseases (CIRD), but patient beliefs can affect adherence to the transition. This study aimed to explore patient experience and satisfaction after switching to CT-P17, a high-concentration (100 mg/mL), citrate-free adalimumab biosimilar.
Patients and methods: This observational, multicenter, prospective French study included adult patients with IBD or CIRD who switched to CT-P17 from reference adalimumab (R-ADA; 100 mg/mL) or a low-concentration adalimumab biosimilar (ADA-BioS; 50 mg/mL). Patients completed online questionnaires to assess treatment perceptions, satisfaction, and tolerance at study inclusion (under previous treatment) and over 3 months of CT-P17 treatment. The primary criterion was overall patient satisfaction, which was assessed with the question, "What is your global satisfaction with the CT-P17 injection?", using a 7-point Likert scale. Multivariate logistic regression analysis was performed to identify factors associated with increased treatment satisfaction after switching to CT-P17.
Results: The total analysis population included 232 patients (IBD 72.0%, CIRD 28.0%). Median patient age was 57.0 years (interquartile range [IQR] 46.0-63.0), 50.4% were men, and median disease duration was 9 years (IQR 5-16). Approximately half of the cohort (51.2%) switched to CT-P17 from an ADA-BioS (including 19.4% from an ADA-BioS with citrate) and half (48.7%) from R-ADA. The proportion of patients who were satisfied with treatment was stable between baseline (under previous treatment) and 3 months (under CT-P17). More patients reported increased satisfaction after switching to CT-P17 from an ADA-BioS (22.7% vs 8.0% when switching from R-ADA; p = 0.002), or from an ADA-BioS containing citrate (28.9% vs 12.3% when switching from a citrate-free ADA-BioS; p = 0.008). Independent prognostic factors for increased satisfaction were previous treatment with an ADA-BioS (odds ratio [OR] 2.88 [95% confidence interval 1.17-7.08]; p = 0.021) and pain at the injection site under previous treatment (OR 1.26 [1.08-1.47]; p = 0.004). Significantly fewer patients reported pain, redness, itching, and hematoma after 3 months of CT-P17 treatment versus baseline (p < 0.001).
Conclusions: The majority of patients had stable or increased treatment satisfaction after switching from R-ADA or an ADA-BioS to CT-P17. In particular, switching to CT-P17 from a low-concentration ADA-BioS or an ADA-BioS containing citrate was associated with increased patient satisfaction. An improvement in overall tolerance with CT-P17 versus previous adalimumab treatment was also reported.
Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov identifier NCT05427942, registered June 22, 2022.
{"title":"Patient Satisfaction and Experience with CT-P17 Following Transition from Reference Adalimumab or Another Adalimumab Biosimilar: Results from the Real-World YU-MATTER Study.","authors":"Guillaume Bouguen, Laure Gossec, Vered Abitbol, Eric Senbel, Guillaume Bonnaud, Xavier Roblin, Yoram Bouhnik, Stéphane Nancey, Nicolas Mathieu, Jérôme Filippi, Lucine Vuitton, Stéphane Nahon, Azeddine Dellal, Alice Denis, Lucile Foulley, Caroline Habauzit, Salim Benkhalifa, Hubert Marotte","doi":"10.1007/s40259-024-00681-2","DOIUrl":"10.1007/s40259-024-00681-2","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and objectives: </strong>Biosimilars are cost-effective alternatives to reference products for patients with inflammatory bowel diseases (IBD) and chronic inflammatory rheumatic diseases (CIRD), but patient beliefs can affect adherence to the transition. This study aimed to explore patient experience and satisfaction after switching to CT-P17, a high-concentration (100 mg/mL), citrate-free adalimumab biosimilar.</p><p><strong>Patients and methods: </strong>This observational, multicenter, prospective French study included adult patients with IBD or CIRD who switched to CT-P17 from reference adalimumab (R-ADA; 100 mg/mL) or a low-concentration adalimumab biosimilar (ADA-BioS; 50 mg/mL). Patients completed online questionnaires to assess treatment perceptions, satisfaction, and tolerance at study inclusion (under previous treatment) and over 3 months of CT-P17 treatment. The primary criterion was overall patient satisfaction, which was assessed with the question, \"What is your global satisfaction with the CT-P17 injection?\", using a 7-point Likert scale. Multivariate logistic regression analysis was performed to identify factors associated with increased treatment satisfaction after switching to CT-P17.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The total analysis population included 232 patients (IBD 72.0%, CIRD 28.0%). Median patient age was 57.0 years (interquartile range [IQR] 46.0-63.0), 50.4% were men, and median disease duration was 9 years (IQR 5-16). Approximately half of the cohort (51.2%) switched to CT-P17 from an ADA-BioS (including 19.4% from an ADA-BioS with citrate) and half (48.7%) from R-ADA. The proportion of patients who were satisfied with treatment was stable between baseline (under previous treatment) and 3 months (under CT-P17). More patients reported increased satisfaction after switching to CT-P17 from an ADA-BioS (22.7% vs 8.0% when switching from R-ADA; p = 0.002), or from an ADA-BioS containing citrate (28.9% vs 12.3% when switching from a citrate-free ADA-BioS; p = 0.008). Independent prognostic factors for increased satisfaction were previous treatment with an ADA-BioS (odds ratio [OR] 2.88 [95% confidence interval 1.17-7.08]; p = 0.021) and pain at the injection site under previous treatment (OR 1.26 [1.08-1.47]; p = 0.004). Significantly fewer patients reported pain, redness, itching, and hematoma after 3 months of CT-P17 treatment versus baseline (p < 0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The majority of patients had stable or increased treatment satisfaction after switching from R-ADA or an ADA-BioS to CT-P17. In particular, switching to CT-P17 from a low-concentration ADA-BioS or an ADA-BioS containing citrate was associated with increased patient satisfaction. An improvement in overall tolerance with CT-P17 versus previous adalimumab treatment was also reported.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>ClinicalTrials.gov identifier NCT05427942, registered June 22, 2022.</p>","PeriodicalId":9022,"journal":{"name":"BioDrugs","volume":" ","pages":"867-878"},"PeriodicalIF":5.4,"publicationDate":"2024-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11530508/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142341164","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-09-18DOI: 10.1007/s40259-024-00680-3
Benjamin Stump, Aaron B. Waxman
Pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH) is a rare and progressive disease that continues to remain highly morbid despite multiple advances in medical therapies. There remains a persistent and desperate need to identify novel methods of treating and, ideally, reversing the pathologic vasculopathy that results in PAH development and progression. Sotatercept is a first-in-class fusion protein that is believed to primarily inhibit activin signaling resulting in decreased cell proliferation and differentiation, though the exact mechanism remains uncertain. Here, we review the currently available PAH therapies, data highlighting the importance of transforming growth factor-β (TGF-β) superfamily signaling in the development of PAH, and the published and on-going clinical trials evaluating sotatercept in the treatment of PAH. We will also discuss preclinical data supporting the potential use of the fusion protein KER-012 in the inhibition of aberrant TGF-β superfamily signaling to ameliorate the obstructive vasculopathy of PAH.
{"title":"Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension and TGF-β Superfamily Signaling: Focus on Sotatercept","authors":"Benjamin Stump, Aaron B. Waxman","doi":"10.1007/s40259-024-00680-3","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s40259-024-00680-3","url":null,"abstract":"<p>Pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH) is a rare and progressive disease that continues to remain highly morbid despite multiple advances in medical therapies. There remains a persistent and desperate need to identify novel methods of treating and, ideally, reversing the pathologic vasculopathy that results in PAH development and progression. Sotatercept is a first-in-class fusion protein that is believed to primarily inhibit activin signaling resulting in decreased cell proliferation and differentiation, though the exact mechanism remains uncertain. Here, we review the currently available PAH therapies, data highlighting the importance of transforming growth factor-β (TGF-β) superfamily signaling in the development of PAH, and the published and on-going clinical trials evaluating sotatercept in the treatment of PAH. We will also discuss preclinical data supporting the potential use of the fusion protein KER-012 in the inhibition of aberrant TGF-β superfamily signaling to ameliorate the obstructive vasculopathy of PAH.</p>","PeriodicalId":9022,"journal":{"name":"BioDrugs","volume":"27 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":6.8,"publicationDate":"2024-09-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142262711","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-09-18DOI: 10.1007/s40259-024-00677-y
Whitney C. Weber, Daniel N. Streblow, Lark L. Coffey
Chikungunya virus is an emerging mosquito-borne alphavirus that causes febrile illness and arthritic disease. Chikungunya virus is endemic in 110 countries and the World Health Organization estimates that it has caused more than 2 million cases of crippling acute and chronic arthritis globally since it re-emerged in 2005. Chikungunya virus outbreaks have occurred in Africa, Asia, Indian Ocean islands, South Pacific islands, Europe, and the Americas. Until recently, no specific countermeasures to prevent or treat chikungunya disease were available. To address this need, multiple vaccines are in human trials. These vaccines use messenger RNA-lipid nanoparticles, inactivated virus, and viral vector approaches, with a live-attenuated vaccine VLA1553 and a virus-like particle PXVX0317 in phase III testing. In November 2023, the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approved the VLA1553 live-attenuated vaccine, which is marketed as IXCHIQ. In June 2024, Health Canada approved IXCHIQ, and in July 2024, IXCHIQ was approved by the European Commission. On August 13, 2024, the US FDA granted priority review for PXVX0317. The European Medicine Agency is considering accelerated assessment review of PXVX0317, with potential for approval by both agencies in 2025. In this review, we summarize published data from pre-clinical and clinical trials for the IXCHIQ and PXVX0317 vaccines. We also discuss unanswered questions including potential impacts of pre-existing chikungunya virus immunity on vaccine safety and immunogenicity, whether long-term immunity can be achieved, safety in children, pregnant, and immunocompromised individuals, and vaccine efficacy in people with previous exposure to other emerging alphaviruses in addition to chikungunya virus.
{"title":"Chikungunya Virus Vaccines: A Review of IXCHIQ and PXVX0317 from Pre-Clinical Evaluation to Licensure","authors":"Whitney C. Weber, Daniel N. Streblow, Lark L. Coffey","doi":"10.1007/s40259-024-00677-y","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s40259-024-00677-y","url":null,"abstract":"<p>Chikungunya virus is an emerging mosquito-borne alphavirus that causes febrile illness and arthritic disease. Chikungunya virus is endemic in 110 countries and the World Health Organization estimates that it has caused more than 2 million cases of crippling acute and chronic arthritis globally since it re-emerged in 2005. Chikungunya virus outbreaks have occurred in Africa, Asia, Indian Ocean islands, South Pacific islands, Europe, and the Americas. Until recently, no specific countermeasures to prevent or treat chikungunya disease were available. To address this need, multiple vaccines are in human trials. These vaccines use messenger RNA-lipid nanoparticles, inactivated virus, and viral vector approaches, with a live-attenuated vaccine VLA1553 and a virus-like particle PXVX0317 in phase III testing. In November 2023, the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approved the VLA1553 live-attenuated vaccine, which is marketed as IXCHIQ. In June 2024, Health Canada approved IXCHIQ, and in July 2024, IXCHIQ was approved by the European Commission. On August 13, 2024, the US FDA granted priority review for PXVX0317. The European Medicine Agency is considering accelerated assessment review of PXVX0317, with potential for approval by both agencies in 2025. In this review, we summarize published data from pre-clinical and clinical trials for the IXCHIQ and PXVX0317 vaccines. We also discuss unanswered questions including potential impacts of pre-existing chikungunya virus immunity on vaccine safety and immunogenicity, whether long-term immunity can be achieved, safety in children, pregnant, and immunocompromised individuals, and vaccine efficacy in people with previous exposure to other emerging alphaviruses in addition to chikungunya virus.</p>","PeriodicalId":9022,"journal":{"name":"BioDrugs","volume":"30 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":6.8,"publicationDate":"2024-09-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142262712","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Background: Stapokibart/CM310, a humanized monoclonal antibody targeting the interleukin-4 receptor α chain, has shown promising treatment benefits in patients with moderate-to-severe atopic dermatitis in previous phase II clinical trials.
Objective: We aimed to evaluate the long-term efficacy and safety of stapokibart in adults with moderate-to-severe atopic dermatitis.
Methods: Enrolled patients who previously completed parent trials of stapokibart received a subcutaneous stapokibart 600-mg loading dose, then 300 mg every 2 weeks up to 52 weeks. Efficacy outcomes included the proportions of patients with ≥ 50%/75%/90% improvements from baseline of parent trials in the Eczema Area and Severity Index, Investigator's Global Assessment, and weekly average of the daily Peak Pruritus Numerical Rating Scale.
Results: In total, 127 patients were enrolled, and 110 (86.6%) completed the study. At week 52, the Eczema Area and Severity Index-50/75/90 response rates were 96.3%, 87.9%, and 71.0%, respectively. An Investigator's Global Assessment 0/1 with a ≥ 2-point reduction was achieved in 39.3% of patients at week 16, increasing to 58.9% at week 52. The proportions of patients with ≥ 3-point and ≥ 4-point reductions in the weekly average of daily Peak Pruritus Numerical Rating Scale scores were 80.2% and 62.2%, respectively, at week 52. Improvement in patients' quality of life was sustained over a 52-week treatment period. Treatment-emergent adverse events occurred in 88.2% of patients, with an exposure-adjusted event rate of 299.2 events/100 patient-years. Coronavirus disease 2019, upper respiratory tract infection, and conjunctivitis were the most common treatment-emergent adverse events.
Conclusions: Long-term treatment with stapokibart for 52 weeks showed high efficacy and good safety profiles, supporting its use as a continuous long-term treatment option for atopic dermatitis.
Clinical trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT04893707 (15 May, 2021).
{"title":"Long-Term Efficacy and Safety of Stapokibart in Adults with Moderate-to-Severe Atopic Dermatitis: An Open-Label Extension, Nonrandomized Clinical Trial.","authors":"Yan Zhao, Jing-Yi Li, Bin Yang, Yang-Feng Ding, Li-Ming Wu, Li-Tao Zhang, Jin-Yan Wang, Qian-Jin Lu, Chun-Lei Zhang, Fu-Ren Zhang, Xiao-Hong Zhu, Yu-Mei Li, Xiao-Hua Tao, Qing-Chun Diao, Lin-Feng Li, Jian-Yun Lu, Xiao-Yong Man, Fu-Qiu Li, Xiu-Juan Xia, Jiao-Ran Song, Ying-Min Jia, Li-Bo Zhang, Bo Chen, Jian-Zhong Zhang","doi":"10.1007/s40259-024-00668-z","DOIUrl":"10.1007/s40259-024-00668-z","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Stapokibart/CM310, a humanized monoclonal antibody targeting the interleukin-4 receptor α chain, has shown promising treatment benefits in patients with moderate-to-severe atopic dermatitis in previous phase II clinical trials.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>We aimed to evaluate the long-term efficacy and safety of stapokibart in adults with moderate-to-severe atopic dermatitis.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Enrolled patients who previously completed parent trials of stapokibart received a subcutaneous stapokibart 600-mg loading dose, then 300 mg every 2 weeks up to 52 weeks. Efficacy outcomes included the proportions of patients with ≥ 50%/75%/90% improvements from baseline of parent trials in the Eczema Area and Severity Index, Investigator's Global Assessment, and weekly average of the daily Peak Pruritus Numerical Rating Scale.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In total, 127 patients were enrolled, and 110 (86.6%) completed the study. At week 52, the Eczema Area and Severity Index-50/75/90 response rates were 96.3%, 87.9%, and 71.0%, respectively. An Investigator's Global Assessment 0/1 with a ≥ 2-point reduction was achieved in 39.3% of patients at week 16, increasing to 58.9% at week 52. The proportions of patients with ≥ 3-point and ≥ 4-point reductions in the weekly average of daily Peak Pruritus Numerical Rating Scale scores were 80.2% and 62.2%, respectively, at week 52. Improvement in patients' quality of life was sustained over a 52-week treatment period. Treatment-emergent adverse events occurred in 88.2% of patients, with an exposure-adjusted event rate of 299.2 events/100 patient-years. Coronavirus disease 2019, upper respiratory tract infection, and conjunctivitis were the most common treatment-emergent adverse events.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Long-term treatment with stapokibart for 52 weeks showed high efficacy and good safety profiles, supporting its use as a continuous long-term treatment option for atopic dermatitis.</p><p><strong>Clinical trial registration: </strong>ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT04893707 (15 May, 2021).</p>","PeriodicalId":9022,"journal":{"name":"BioDrugs","volume":" ","pages":"681-689"},"PeriodicalIF":5.4,"publicationDate":"2024-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141854701","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-09-01Epub Date: 2024-07-30DOI: 10.1007/s40259-024-00669-y
Anne Holtermann, Mila Gislon, Martin Angele, Marion Subklewe, Michael von Bergwelt-Baildon, Kirsten Lauber, Sebastian Kobold
Chimeric antigen receptor T cell therapy has been established in the treatment of various B cell malignancies. However, translating this therapeutic effect to treat solid tumors has been challenging because of their inter-tumoral as well as intratumoral heterogeneity and immunosuppressive microenvironment. Local interventions, such as surgery, radiotherapy, local ablation, and locoregional drug delivery, can enhance chimeric antigen receptor T cell therapy in solid tumors by improving tumor infiltration and reducing systemic toxicities. Additionally, ablation and radiotherapy have proven to (re-)activate systemic immune responses via abscopal effects and reprogram the tumor microenvironment on a physical, cellular, and chemical level. This review highlights the potential synergy of the combined approaches to overcome barriers of chimeric antigen receptor T cell therapy and summarizes recent studies that may pave the way for new treatment regimens.
嵌合抗原受体 T 细胞疗法已用于治疗各种 B 细胞恶性肿瘤。然而,由于实体瘤的瘤间和瘤内异质性以及免疫抑制微环境,将这种治疗效果用于治疗实体瘤一直是一项挑战。手术、放疗、局部消融和局部给药等局部干预措施可以通过改善肿瘤浸润和减少全身毒性来加强嵌合抗原受体T细胞治疗实体瘤的效果。此外,消融和放疗已被证明可通过脱落效应(重新)激活全身免疫反应,并在物理、细胞和化学水平上重新规划肿瘤微环境。本综述强调了联合疗法在克服嵌合抗原受体T细胞疗法障碍方面的潜在协同作用,并总结了可能为新治疗方案铺平道路的最新研究。
{"title":"Prospects of Synergy: Local Interventions and CAR T Cell Therapy in Solid Tumors.","authors":"Anne Holtermann, Mila Gislon, Martin Angele, Marion Subklewe, Michael von Bergwelt-Baildon, Kirsten Lauber, Sebastian Kobold","doi":"10.1007/s40259-024-00669-y","DOIUrl":"10.1007/s40259-024-00669-y","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Chimeric antigen receptor T cell therapy has been established in the treatment of various B cell malignancies. However, translating this therapeutic effect to treat solid tumors has been challenging because of their inter-tumoral as well as intratumoral heterogeneity and immunosuppressive microenvironment. Local interventions, such as surgery, radiotherapy, local ablation, and locoregional drug delivery, can enhance chimeric antigen receptor T cell therapy in solid tumors by improving tumor infiltration and reducing systemic toxicities. Additionally, ablation and radiotherapy have proven to (re-)activate systemic immune responses via abscopal effects and reprogram the tumor microenvironment on a physical, cellular, and chemical level. This review highlights the potential synergy of the combined approaches to overcome barriers of chimeric antigen receptor T cell therapy and summarizes recent studies that may pave the way for new treatment regimens.</p>","PeriodicalId":9022,"journal":{"name":"BioDrugs","volume":" ","pages":"611-637"},"PeriodicalIF":5.4,"publicationDate":"2024-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11358237/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141854702","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-09-01Epub Date: 2024-08-22DOI: 10.1007/s40259-024-00673-2
Ashish Srinivasan, Daniel van Langenberg, Peter De Cruz, Jonathan Segal, Abhinav Vasudevan, Richard N Upton
<p><strong>Background: </strong>The optimal infliximab dose intensification strategy to address loss of response associated with subtherapeutic infliximab trough levels remains uncertain, as does whether post-intensification trough and treatment targets should influence this decision.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>This pharmacokinetic simulation study aimed to identify infliximab dose intensification strategies capable of achieving post-intensification infliximab trough thresholds associated with clinical and objective treatment targets in Crohn's disease and ulcerative colitis.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A validated pharmacokinetic infliximab model, applied to 200 simulated patients, identified those with subtherapeutic (< 3.00 mg/L) trough levels after 30 weeks of standard (5 mg/kg 8-weekly) dosing, and subsequently applied 10 dose intensification strategies over a further 32 weeks. The proportion of simulations achieving 32-week post-intensification infliximab trough levels associated with endoscopic remission (ulcerative colitis > 7.50 mg/L, Crohn's disease > 9.70 mg/L) was the primary outcome, with perianal fistula healing (Crohn's disease > 10.10 mg/L) and clinical improvement (ulcerative colitis > 3.70 mg/L, Crohn's disease > 7.00mg/L) evaluated as secondary outcomes. All outcomes were stratified by intensity of dose intensification, with standard (≤ 10 mg/kg 8-weekly or 5 mg/kg 4-weekly; n = 5) and intensive (> 10 mg/kg 8-weekly or 5 mg/kg 4-weekly; n = 5) dosing strategies defined, respectively.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The median pre-intensification infliximab trough level was 0.91 mg/L (interquartile range 1.37). Intensive dosing strategies were more likely to achieve infliximab trough concentrations associated with endoscopic remission (ulcerative colitis 36.48% vs. 10.80%, Crohn's disease 25.98 vs. 4.68%), perianal fistula healing (24.52% vs. 4.36%) and clinical improvement (ulcerative colitis 61.90% vs. 34.86%, Crohn's disease 40.32 vs. 12.08%) than standard intensification strategies (all p < 0.01). When controlling for cumulative (mg/kg) infliximab dose over 32 weeks, strategies that concurrently dose increased and interval shortened achieved the highest infliximab trough levels (all p < 0.01).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This simulation-based analysis highlights the potential of using post-intensification infliximab trough thresholds associated with aspirational treatment targets in Crohn's disease and ulcerative colitis to guide choice of infliximab dose intensification strategy. Intensive dose intensification strategies, particularly those that concurrently dose increase and interval shorten, appear to achieve higher infliximab levels than standard dose intensification strategies. This may be particularly important in the pursuit of stringent endpoints, such as endoscopic remission and fistula healing, which have been consistently associated with higher infliximab trough levels. These findings require va
背景:解决因夫利昔单抗低谷水平治疗相关的应答丧失问题的最佳英夫利昔单抗剂量加强策略,以及加强后低谷和治疗目标是否应影响这一决定,仍不确定:这项药代动力学模拟研究旨在确定英夫利西单抗剂量加强策略,以达到与克罗恩病和溃疡性结肠炎临床和客观治疗目标相关的加强后英夫利西单抗谷值阈值:将经过验证的药代动力学英夫利西单抗模型应用于200名模拟患者,确定治疗效果不达标者(7.50 mg/L,克罗恩病>9.70 mg/L)为主要结果,肛周瘘愈合(克罗恩病>10.10 mg/L)和临床改善(溃疡性结肠炎>3.70 mg/L,克罗恩病>7.00 mg/L)为次要结果。所有结果均按剂量强化强度分层,分别定义了标准(≤ 10 mg/kg 8周一次或5 mg/kg 4周一次;n = 5)和强化(> 10 mg/kg 8周一次或5 mg/kg 4周一次;n = 5)剂量策略:结果:强化前英夫利西单抗谷值的中位数为0.91毫克/升(四分位距为1.37)。与标准强化策略相比,强化给药策略更有可能达到与内镜缓解(溃疡性结肠炎 36.48% vs. 10.80%,克罗恩病 25.98% vs. 4.68%)、肛周瘘管愈合(24.52% vs. 4.36%)和临床改善(溃疡性结肠炎 61.90% vs. 34.86%,克罗恩病 40.32% vs. 12.08%)相关的英夫利西单抗谷浓度(均为 p 结论:这项基于模拟的分析强调了使用与克罗恩病和溃疡性结肠炎理想治疗目标相关的强化后英夫利西单抗谷阈值来指导选择英夫利西单抗剂量强化策略的潜力。与标准剂量强化策略相比,强化剂量强化策略,尤其是同时增加剂量和缩短间隔的策略,似乎能达到更高的英夫利西单抗水平。这对于追求严格的终点(如内镜下缓解和瘘管愈合)可能尤为重要,因为这些终点一直与较高的英夫利西单抗谷值水平相关。这些发现需要在真实世界的队列中进行验证。
{"title":"Treatment Targets Should Influence Choice of Infliximab Dose Intensification Strategy in Inflammatory Bowel Disease: A Pharmacokinetic Simulation Study.","authors":"Ashish Srinivasan, Daniel van Langenberg, Peter De Cruz, Jonathan Segal, Abhinav Vasudevan, Richard N Upton","doi":"10.1007/s40259-024-00673-2","DOIUrl":"10.1007/s40259-024-00673-2","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The optimal infliximab dose intensification strategy to address loss of response associated with subtherapeutic infliximab trough levels remains uncertain, as does whether post-intensification trough and treatment targets should influence this decision.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>This pharmacokinetic simulation study aimed to identify infliximab dose intensification strategies capable of achieving post-intensification infliximab trough thresholds associated with clinical and objective treatment targets in Crohn's disease and ulcerative colitis.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A validated pharmacokinetic infliximab model, applied to 200 simulated patients, identified those with subtherapeutic (< 3.00 mg/L) trough levels after 30 weeks of standard (5 mg/kg 8-weekly) dosing, and subsequently applied 10 dose intensification strategies over a further 32 weeks. The proportion of simulations achieving 32-week post-intensification infliximab trough levels associated with endoscopic remission (ulcerative colitis > 7.50 mg/L, Crohn's disease > 9.70 mg/L) was the primary outcome, with perianal fistula healing (Crohn's disease > 10.10 mg/L) and clinical improvement (ulcerative colitis > 3.70 mg/L, Crohn's disease > 7.00mg/L) evaluated as secondary outcomes. All outcomes were stratified by intensity of dose intensification, with standard (≤ 10 mg/kg 8-weekly or 5 mg/kg 4-weekly; n = 5) and intensive (> 10 mg/kg 8-weekly or 5 mg/kg 4-weekly; n = 5) dosing strategies defined, respectively.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The median pre-intensification infliximab trough level was 0.91 mg/L (interquartile range 1.37). Intensive dosing strategies were more likely to achieve infliximab trough concentrations associated with endoscopic remission (ulcerative colitis 36.48% vs. 10.80%, Crohn's disease 25.98 vs. 4.68%), perianal fistula healing (24.52% vs. 4.36%) and clinical improvement (ulcerative colitis 61.90% vs. 34.86%, Crohn's disease 40.32 vs. 12.08%) than standard intensification strategies (all p < 0.01). When controlling for cumulative (mg/kg) infliximab dose over 32 weeks, strategies that concurrently dose increased and interval shortened achieved the highest infliximab trough levels (all p < 0.01).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This simulation-based analysis highlights the potential of using post-intensification infliximab trough thresholds associated with aspirational treatment targets in Crohn's disease and ulcerative colitis to guide choice of infliximab dose intensification strategy. Intensive dose intensification strategies, particularly those that concurrently dose increase and interval shorten, appear to achieve higher infliximab levels than standard dose intensification strategies. This may be particularly important in the pursuit of stringent endpoints, such as endoscopic remission and fistula healing, which have been consistently associated with higher infliximab trough levels. These findings require va","PeriodicalId":9022,"journal":{"name":"BioDrugs","volume":" ","pages":"691-702"},"PeriodicalIF":5.4,"publicationDate":"2024-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11358351/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142016304","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}