首页 > 最新文献

BJS Open最新文献

英文 中文
Economic impact of limb-salvage strategies in chronic limb-threatening ischaemia: modelling and budget impact study based on national registry data. 肢体挽救策略对慢性肢体缺血威胁的经济影响:基于国家登记数据的建模和预算影响研究。
IF 3.5 3区 医学 Q1 SURGERY Pub Date : 2024-09-03 DOI: 10.1093/bjsopen/zrae099
Athanasios Saratzis, Hany Zayed, Anna Buylova, William Rawlinson, Giota Veliu, Markus Siebert

Background: Missed opportunities to reduce numbers of primary major lower-limb amputation and increase limb-salvage procedures when treating chronic limb-threatening ischaemia have previously been identified in the literature. However, the potential economic savings for healthcare providers when salvaging a chronic limb-threatening ischaemia-affected limb have not been well documented.

Methods: A model using National Health Service healthcare usage and cost data for 1.6 million individuals and averaged numbers of primary surgical procedures for chronic limb-threatening ischaemia from England and Wales in 2019-2021 was created to perform a budget impact analysis. Two scenarios were tested: the averaged national rates of major lower-limb amputation (above the ankle joint), angioplasty, open bypass surgery or arterial endarterectomy in the National Vascular Registry (current scenario); and revascularization rates adjusted based on the lowest amputation rate reported by the National Vascular Registry at the time of the study (hypothetical scenario). The primary outcome was the net impact on costs to the National Health Service over 12 months after the index procedure.

Results: In the current scenario, the proportions of different index procedures were 10% for lower-limb major amputation, 55% for angioplasty, 25% for open bypass surgery and 10% for arterial endarterectomy. In the hypothetical scenario, the procedure rates were 3% for major lower-limb amputation, 59% for angioplasty, 27% for open bypass surgery and 11% for arterial endarterectomy. For 16 025 index chronic limb-threatening ischaemia procedures, the total care cost in the current scenario was €243 924 927. In the hypothetical scenario, costs would be reduced for index procedures (-€10 013 814), community care (-€633 943) and major cardiovascular events (-€383 407), and increased for primary care (€59 827), outpatient appointments (€120 050) and subsequent chronic limb-threatening ischaemia-related surgery (€1 179 107). The net saving to the National Health Service would be €9 645 259.

Conclusion: A shift away from primary major lower-limb amputation towards revascularization could lead to substantial savings for the National Health Service without major cost increases later in the care pathway, indicating that care decisions taken in hospitals have wider benefits.

背景:以前曾有文献指出,在治疗慢性肢体缺血时,减少主要下肢截肢和增加肢体抢救程序的机会已经错过。然而,在抢救受慢性肢体缺血威胁的肢体时,医疗服务提供者可能节省的经济成本却没有得到很好的记录:方法:利用英格兰和威尔士 160 万人的国民健康服务医疗保健使用和成本数据以及 2019-2021 年慢性肢体危重缺血初级外科手术的平均数量创建了一个模型,以进行预算影响分析。测试了两种方案:国家血管登记处的全国主要下肢截肢(踝关节以上)、血管成形术、开放式搭桥手术或动脉内膜切除术的平均比率(当前方案);根据国家血管登记处在研究时报告的最低截肢率调整的血管再通率(假设方案)。主要结果是指数手术后12个月内对国民健康服务成本的净影响:结果:在当前情况下,不同指数手术的比例分别为:下肢大截肢术 10%、血管成形术 55%、开放式搭桥手术 25%、动脉内膜切除术 10%。在假设情况下,下肢大截肢率为 3%,血管成形术为 59%,开放式搭桥手术为 27%,动脉内膜切除术为 11%。对于 16 025 例慢性危及肢体缺血指数手术,当前情景下的总护理成本为 243 924 927 欧元。在假设方案中,指数手术(-10 013 814 欧元)、社区护理(-633 943 欧元)和重大心血管事件(-383 407 欧元)的费用将减少,而初级护理(59 827 欧元)、门诊预约(120 050 欧元)和随后的慢性肢体缺血相关手术(1 179 107 欧元)的费用将增加。国民医疗服务的净节省额为 9 645 259 欧元:结论:从主要的下肢截肢手术转向血管再通手术,可为国家卫生服务部门节省大量费用,而不会导致后期护理成本大幅增加,这表明医院做出的护理决定具有更广泛的益处。
{"title":"Economic impact of limb-salvage strategies in chronic limb-threatening ischaemia: modelling and budget impact study based on national registry data.","authors":"Athanasios Saratzis, Hany Zayed, Anna Buylova, William Rawlinson, Giota Veliu, Markus Siebert","doi":"10.1093/bjsopen/zrae099","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1093/bjsopen/zrae099","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Missed opportunities to reduce numbers of primary major lower-limb amputation and increase limb-salvage procedures when treating chronic limb-threatening ischaemia have previously been identified in the literature. However, the potential economic savings for healthcare providers when salvaging a chronic limb-threatening ischaemia-affected limb have not been well documented.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A model using National Health Service healthcare usage and cost data for 1.6 million individuals and averaged numbers of primary surgical procedures for chronic limb-threatening ischaemia from England and Wales in 2019-2021 was created to perform a budget impact analysis. Two scenarios were tested: the averaged national rates of major lower-limb amputation (above the ankle joint), angioplasty, open bypass surgery or arterial endarterectomy in the National Vascular Registry (current scenario); and revascularization rates adjusted based on the lowest amputation rate reported by the National Vascular Registry at the time of the study (hypothetical scenario). The primary outcome was the net impact on costs to the National Health Service over 12 months after the index procedure.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In the current scenario, the proportions of different index procedures were 10% for lower-limb major amputation, 55% for angioplasty, 25% for open bypass surgery and 10% for arterial endarterectomy. In the hypothetical scenario, the procedure rates were 3% for major lower-limb amputation, 59% for angioplasty, 27% for open bypass surgery and 11% for arterial endarterectomy. For 16 025 index chronic limb-threatening ischaemia procedures, the total care cost in the current scenario was €243 924 927. In the hypothetical scenario, costs would be reduced for index procedures (-€10 013 814), community care (-€633 943) and major cardiovascular events (-€383 407), and increased for primary care (€59 827), outpatient appointments (€120 050) and subsequent chronic limb-threatening ischaemia-related surgery (€1 179 107). The net saving to the National Health Service would be €9 645 259.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>A shift away from primary major lower-limb amputation towards revascularization could lead to substantial savings for the National Health Service without major cost increases later in the care pathway, indicating that care decisions taken in hospitals have wider benefits.</p>","PeriodicalId":9028,"journal":{"name":"BJS Open","volume":"8 5","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.5,"publicationDate":"2024-09-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11408877/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142280172","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Nationwide prospective audit for the evaluation of appendicitis risk prediction models in adults: right iliac fossa treatment (RIFT)-Turkey. 评估成人阑尾炎风险预测模型的全国性前瞻性审计:右髂窝治疗(RIFT)-土耳其。
IF 3.5 3区 医学 Q1 SURGERY Pub Date : 2024-09-03 DOI: 10.1093/bjsopen/zrae120
Ali Yalcinkaya, Ahmet Yalcinkaya, Bengi Balci, Can Keskin, Ibrahim Erkan, Alp Yildiz, Erdinc Kamer, Sezai Leventoglu

Background: Appendicitis is the most prevalent surgical emergency. The negative appendicectomy rate and diagnostic uncertainty are important concerns. This study aimed to assess the effectiveness of current appendicitis risk prediction models in patients with acute right iliac fossa pain.

Methods: A nationwide prospective observational study was conducted, including all consecutive adult patients who presented with right iliac fossa pain. Diagnostic, clinical and negative appendicectomy rate data were recorded. The Alvarado score, Appendicitis Inflammatory Response (AIR), Raja Isteri Pengiran Anak Saleha Appendicitis (RIPASA) and Adult Appendicitis Score systems were calculated with collected data to classify patients into risk categories. Diagnostic value and categorization performance were evaluated, with use of risk category-based metrics including 'true positive rate' (percentage of appendicitis patients in the highest risk category), 'failure rate' (percentage of patients with appendicitis in the lowest risk category) and 'categorization resolution' (true positive rate/failure rate).

Results: A total of 3358 patients from 84 centres were included. Female patients were less likely to undergo surgery than men (71.5% versus 82.5% respectively; relative risk 0.866, 95% c.i. 0.834 to 0.901, P < 0.001); with a three-fold higher negative appendicectomy rate (11.3% versus 4.1% respectively; relative risk 2.744, 95% c.i. 2.047 to 3.677, P < 0.001). Ultrasonography was utilized in 56.8% and computed tomography in 75.2% of all patients. The Adult Appendicitis Score had the best diagnostic performance for the whole population; however, only RIPASA was significant in men. All scoring systems were successful in females patients, but Adult Appendicitis Score had the highest area under the receiver operating characteristic curve value. The RIPASA and the Adult Appendicitis Score had the best categorization resolution values, complemented by their exceedingly low failure rates in both male and female patients. Alvarado and AIR had extremely high failure rates in men.

Conclusion: The negative appendicectomy rate was low overall, but women had an almost three-fold higher negative appendicectomy rate despite lower likelihood to undergo surgery. The overuse of imaging tests, best exemplified by the 75.2% frequency of patients undergoing computed tomography, may lead to increased costs. Risk-scoring systems such as RIPASA and Adult Appendicitis Score appear to be superior to Alvarado and AIR.

背景:阑尾炎是最常见的外科急症:阑尾炎是最常见的外科急症。阑尾切除术的阴性率和诊断的不确定性是人们关注的重要问题。本研究旨在评估当前阑尾炎风险预测模型在急性右髂窝疼痛患者中的有效性:方法:开展了一项全国性的前瞻性观察研究,包括所有连续出现右髂窝疼痛的成年患者。记录诊断、临床和阑尾切除阴性率数据。根据收集的数据计算出阿尔瓦拉多评分、阑尾炎炎症反应(AIR)、Raja Isteri Pengiran Anak Saleha Appendicitis(RIPASA)和成人阑尾炎评分系统,将患者分为不同的风险类别。通过使用基于风险类别的指标,包括 "真阳性率"(最高风险类别中阑尾炎患者的百分比)、"失败率"(最低风险类别中阑尾炎患者的百分比)和 "分类分辨率"(真阳性率/失败率),对诊断价值和分类性能进行了评估:结果:共纳入了来自 84 个中心的 3358 名患者。女性患者接受手术的可能性低于男性(分别为71.5%对82.5%;相对风险0.866,95% c.i.0.834至0.901,P <0.001);阑尾切除术的阴性率高三倍(分别为11.3%对4.1%;相对风险2.744,95% c.i.2.047至3.677,P <0.001)。56.8%的患者使用了超声波检查,75.2%的患者使用了计算机断层扫描。在所有人群中,成人阑尾炎评分的诊断效果最好;然而,只有 RIPASA 对男性有显著意义。所有评分系统对女性患者的诊断都很成功,但成人阑尾炎评分的接收者操作特征曲线下面积值最高。RIPASA 和成人阑尾炎评分具有最佳的分类分辨率值,而且在男性和女性患者中的失败率都非常低。Alvarado和AIR在男性患者中的失败率极高:结论:阑尾切除术的阴性率总体较低,但女性尽管接受手术的可能性较低,但阑尾切除术的阴性率却高出近三倍。过度使用影像检查可能会导致成本增加,接受计算机断层扫描的患者比例高达 75.2%,就是最好的例证。RIPASA和成人阑尾炎评分等风险评分系统似乎优于Alvarado和AIR。
{"title":"Nationwide prospective audit for the evaluation of appendicitis risk prediction models in adults: right iliac fossa treatment (RIFT)-Turkey.","authors":"Ali Yalcinkaya, Ahmet Yalcinkaya, Bengi Balci, Can Keskin, Ibrahim Erkan, Alp Yildiz, Erdinc Kamer, Sezai Leventoglu","doi":"10.1093/bjsopen/zrae120","DOIUrl":"10.1093/bjsopen/zrae120","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Appendicitis is the most prevalent surgical emergency. The negative appendicectomy rate and diagnostic uncertainty are important concerns. This study aimed to assess the effectiveness of current appendicitis risk prediction models in patients with acute right iliac fossa pain.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A nationwide prospective observational study was conducted, including all consecutive adult patients who presented with right iliac fossa pain. Diagnostic, clinical and negative appendicectomy rate data were recorded. The Alvarado score, Appendicitis Inflammatory Response (AIR), Raja Isteri Pengiran Anak Saleha Appendicitis (RIPASA) and Adult Appendicitis Score systems were calculated with collected data to classify patients into risk categories. Diagnostic value and categorization performance were evaluated, with use of risk category-based metrics including 'true positive rate' (percentage of appendicitis patients in the highest risk category), 'failure rate' (percentage of patients with appendicitis in the lowest risk category) and 'categorization resolution' (true positive rate/failure rate).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 3358 patients from 84 centres were included. Female patients were less likely to undergo surgery than men (71.5% versus 82.5% respectively; relative risk 0.866, 95% c.i. 0.834 to 0.901, P < 0.001); with a three-fold higher negative appendicectomy rate (11.3% versus 4.1% respectively; relative risk 2.744, 95% c.i. 2.047 to 3.677, P < 0.001). Ultrasonography was utilized in 56.8% and computed tomography in 75.2% of all patients. The Adult Appendicitis Score had the best diagnostic performance for the whole population; however, only RIPASA was significant in men. All scoring systems were successful in females patients, but Adult Appendicitis Score had the highest area under the receiver operating characteristic curve value. The RIPASA and the Adult Appendicitis Score had the best categorization resolution values, complemented by their exceedingly low failure rates in both male and female patients. Alvarado and AIR had extremely high failure rates in men.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The negative appendicectomy rate was low overall, but women had an almost three-fold higher negative appendicectomy rate despite lower likelihood to undergo surgery. The overuse of imaging tests, best exemplified by the 75.2% frequency of patients undergoing computed tomography, may lead to increased costs. Risk-scoring systems such as RIPASA and Adult Appendicitis Score appear to be superior to Alvarado and AIR.</p>","PeriodicalId":9028,"journal":{"name":"BJS Open","volume":"8 5","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.5,"publicationDate":"2024-09-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11463697/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142387738","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Carbon footprint of non-melanoma skin cancer surgery. 非黑色素瘤皮肤癌手术的碳足迹。
IF 3.5 3区 医学 Q1 SURGERY Pub Date : 2024-09-03 DOI: 10.1093/bjsopen/zrae084
Ky-Leigh Ang, Matthew Jovic, Ian Malin, Stephen R Ali, Sairan Whitaker, Iain S Whitaker

Background: Climate change poses a significant global health threat and healthcare, including surgery, contributes to greenhouse gas emissions. Efforts have been made to promote sustainability in surgery, but the literature on sustainability in plastic surgery remains limited.

Methods: A life-cycle analysis was used to assess and quantify the environmental emissions associated with three distinct reconstructive methods utilized in non-melanoma skin cancer surgery: direct closure, split-thickness skin graft, and full-thickness skin graft. Analyses were conducted in March 2023 in Morriston Hospital, Swansea, UK. The carbon footprints for non-melanoma skin cancer surgery in England and Wales were then estimated.

Results: The mean carbon emissions for non-melanoma skin cancer surgery ranged from 29.82 to 34.31 kgCO₂eq. Theatre energy consumption (4.29-8.76 kgCO₂eq) and consumables (16.87 kgCO₂eq) were significant contributors. Waste produced during non-melanoma skin cancer surgery accounted for 1.31 kgCO₂eq and sterilization of reusable surgical instruments resulted in 1.92 kgCO₂eq of carbon emissions. Meanwhile, transportation, dressings, pharmaceuticals, and laundry accounted for 0.57, 2.65, 1.85, and 0.38 kgCO₂eq respectively. The excision of non-melanoma skin cancer with direct closure (19.29-22.41 kgCO₂eq) resulted in the lowest carbon emissions compared with excision with split-thickness skin graft (43.80-49.06 kgCO₂eq) and full-thickness skin graft (31.58-37.02 kgCO₂eq). In 2021, it was estimated that non-melanoma skin cancer surgery had an annual carbon footprint of 306 775 kgCO₂eq in Wales and 4 402 650 kgCO₂eq in England. It was possible to predict that, by 2035, carbon emissions from non-melanoma skin cancer surgery will account for 388 927 kgCO₂eq in Wales and 5 419 770 kgCO₂eq in England.

Conclusion: This study highlights the environmental impact of non-melanoma skin cancer in plastic surgery departments and emphasizes the need for sustainable practices. Collaboration between surgeons and policymakers is essential and further data collection is recommended for better analysis.

背景:气候变化对全球健康构成重大威胁,而包括外科手术在内的医疗保健行业也造成了温室气体排放。人们一直在努力促进外科手术的可持续发展,但有关整形外科可持续发展的文献仍然有限:方法:采用生命周期分析法对非黑色素瘤皮肤癌手术中使用的三种不同的重建方法(直接缝合、分厚植皮和全厚植皮)相关的环境排放量进行评估和量化。分析于 2023 年 3 月在英国斯旺西的莫里斯顿医院进行。然后估算了英格兰和威尔士非黑色素瘤皮肤癌手术的碳足迹:结果:非黑色素瘤皮肤癌手术的平均碳排放量为 29.82 至 34.31 kgCO₂eq。手术室能源消耗(4.29-8.76 kgCO₂eq)和消耗品(16.87 kgCO₂eq)是造成碳排放的主要因素。非黑色素瘤皮肤癌手术过程中产生的废物占 1.31 kgCO₂eq,可重复使用手术器械的消毒导致 1.92 kgCO₂eq的碳排放。同时,运输、敷料、药品和洗衣的碳排放量分别为 0.57、2.65、1.85 和 0.38 kgCO₂eq。非黑色素瘤皮肤癌的直接缝合切除术(19.29-22.41 kgCO₂eq)与分厚植皮切除术(43.80-49.06 kgCO₂eq)和全厚植皮切除术(31.58-37.02 kgCO₂eq)相比,碳排放量最低。据估计,2021 年,非黑色素瘤皮肤癌手术在威尔士的年碳足迹为 306 775 kgCO₂eq,在英格兰为 4 402 650 kgCO₂eq。可以预测,到 2035 年,非黑色素瘤皮肤癌手术的碳排放量在威尔士将达到 388 927 kgCO₂eq,在英格兰将达到 5 419 770 kgCO₂eq:本研究强调了整形外科非黑色素瘤皮肤癌对环境的影响,并强调了可持续实践的必要性。外科医生和政策制定者之间的合作至关重要,建议进一步收集数据以进行更好的分析。
{"title":"Carbon footprint of non-melanoma skin cancer surgery.","authors":"Ky-Leigh Ang, Matthew Jovic, Ian Malin, Stephen R Ali, Sairan Whitaker, Iain S Whitaker","doi":"10.1093/bjsopen/zrae084","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1093/bjsopen/zrae084","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Climate change poses a significant global health threat and healthcare, including surgery, contributes to greenhouse gas emissions. Efforts have been made to promote sustainability in surgery, but the literature on sustainability in plastic surgery remains limited.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A life-cycle analysis was used to assess and quantify the environmental emissions associated with three distinct reconstructive methods utilized in non-melanoma skin cancer surgery: direct closure, split-thickness skin graft, and full-thickness skin graft. Analyses were conducted in March 2023 in Morriston Hospital, Swansea, UK. The carbon footprints for non-melanoma skin cancer surgery in England and Wales were then estimated.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The mean carbon emissions for non-melanoma skin cancer surgery ranged from 29.82 to 34.31 kgCO₂eq. Theatre energy consumption (4.29-8.76 kgCO₂eq) and consumables (16.87 kgCO₂eq) were significant contributors. Waste produced during non-melanoma skin cancer surgery accounted for 1.31 kgCO₂eq and sterilization of reusable surgical instruments resulted in 1.92 kgCO₂eq of carbon emissions. Meanwhile, transportation, dressings, pharmaceuticals, and laundry accounted for 0.57, 2.65, 1.85, and 0.38 kgCO₂eq respectively. The excision of non-melanoma skin cancer with direct closure (19.29-22.41 kgCO₂eq) resulted in the lowest carbon emissions compared with excision with split-thickness skin graft (43.80-49.06 kgCO₂eq) and full-thickness skin graft (31.58-37.02 kgCO₂eq). In 2021, it was estimated that non-melanoma skin cancer surgery had an annual carbon footprint of 306 775 kgCO₂eq in Wales and 4 402 650 kgCO₂eq in England. It was possible to predict that, by 2035, carbon emissions from non-melanoma skin cancer surgery will account for 388 927 kgCO₂eq in Wales and 5 419 770 kgCO₂eq in England.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This study highlights the environmental impact of non-melanoma skin cancer in plastic surgery departments and emphasizes the need for sustainable practices. Collaboration between surgeons and policymakers is essential and further data collection is recommended for better analysis.</p>","PeriodicalId":9028,"journal":{"name":"BJS Open","volume":"8 5","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.5,"publicationDate":"2024-09-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11483578/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142457409","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Colorectal cancer prevalence in faecal immunochemical test non-returners: potential for health inequality in symptomatic referral pathways. 粪便免疫化学检验未返回者的结直肠癌患病率:症状转诊路径中潜在的健康不平等。
IF 3.5 3区 医学 Q1 SURGERY Pub Date : 2024-09-03 DOI: 10.1093/bjsopen/zrae119
Adam D Gerrard, Jonty Coxon, Yasuko Maeda, Evropi Theodoratou, Malcolm G Dunlop, Farhat V N Din

Background: This study aimed to describe the faecal immunochemical test non-return rate of those referred with high-risk symptoms of colorectal cancer from primary care, and the clinical outcomes of the 'non-returners'.

Methods: From January 2019 to July 2021, patients referred to secondary care with symptoms suspicious of colorectal cancer and a referral priority of urgent or urgent suspicion of cancer were sent a faecal immunochemical test. All patients were investigated regardless of faecal immunochemical test return or result. Demographics and clinical outcomes such as colorectal cancer prevalence were compared between those who returned a faecal immunochemical test and non-returners.

Results: Of 7345 patients included in the study, 874 (11.9%) did not return a faecal immunochemical test. Non-returner characteristics included male sex (P = 0.040), younger age (median age 57 versus 65 years, P < 0.001), per rectal bleeding (P < 0.001) and lower socioeconomic status (median Scottish Index of Multiple Deprivation, 6 versus 7, P < 0.001) compared with those who returned a faecal immunochemical test. Of 6294 patients undergoing colorectal investigation, there was a greater prevalence of colorectal cancer (5.4% versus 3.6% P = 0.032) and significant bowel pathology than in the non-returners (15.3% versus 9.8%, P < 0.001). With a median follow-up of 25 months, the colorectal cancer prevalence for the entire 7345 cohort was equal between those who returned and did not return a faecal immunochemical test (3.2% versus 3.8%, P = 0.108). Of note, the non-returners diagnosed with colorectal cancer were younger (median age 64 versus 73 years, P < 0.001) and from a lower socioeconomic area (median Scottish Index of Multiple Deprivation 4 versus 7, P = 0.015) than faecal immunochemical test returners.

Conclusion: Patients referred to secondary care, with symptoms suspicious of colorectal cancer, that did not return a faecal immunochemical test had a similar colorectal cancer prevalence to those that returned the test.

背景:本研究旨在描述从初级医疗机构转诊的具有结直肠癌高危症状的患者的粪便免疫化学检验未返回率,以及 "未返回者 "的临床结果:方法:2019 年 1 月至 2021 年 7 月,转诊至二级医疗机构、症状疑似结直肠癌、转诊优先级为紧急或紧急疑似癌症的患者均接受粪便免疫化学检验。无论粪便免疫化学检验结果如何,所有患者均接受了调查。对返回粪便免疫化学检验结果和未返回检验结果的患者的人口统计学和临床结果(如结直肠癌发病率)进行比较:结果:在纳入研究的 7345 名患者中,有 874 人(11.9%)未返回粪便免疫化学检验结果。与返回粪便免疫化学检验的患者相比,未返回者的特征包括男性(P = 0.040)、年龄较小(中位数为 57 岁对 65 岁,P < 0.001)、直肠周围出血(P < 0.001)和社会经济地位较低(苏格兰多重贫困指数中位数为 6 对 7,P < 0.001)。在接受结直肠检查的 6294 名患者中,结直肠癌(5.4% 对 3.6%,P = 0.032)和明显肠道病变的发病率高于未返回者(15.3% 对 9.8%,P < 0.001)。中位随访时间为 25 个月,在整个 7345 群体中,返回和未返回粪便免疫化学检验者的结直肠癌发病率相同(3.2% 对 3.8%,P = 0.108)。值得注意的是,与粪便免疫化学检验结果送检者相比,未送检者被确诊为结直肠癌的年龄更小(中位年龄为 64 岁对 73 岁,P < 0.001),社会经济地位更低(苏格兰多重贫困指数中位数为 4 对 7,P = 0.015):结论:有结直肠癌可疑症状但未返回粪便免疫化学检验结果的转诊到二级医疗机构的患者,其结直肠癌发病率与返回检验结果的患者相似。
{"title":"Colorectal cancer prevalence in faecal immunochemical test non-returners: potential for health inequality in symptomatic referral pathways.","authors":"Adam D Gerrard, Jonty Coxon, Yasuko Maeda, Evropi Theodoratou, Malcolm G Dunlop, Farhat V N Din","doi":"10.1093/bjsopen/zrae119","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1093/bjsopen/zrae119","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>This study aimed to describe the faecal immunochemical test non-return rate of those referred with high-risk symptoms of colorectal cancer from primary care, and the clinical outcomes of the 'non-returners'.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>From January 2019 to July 2021, patients referred to secondary care with symptoms suspicious of colorectal cancer and a referral priority of urgent or urgent suspicion of cancer were sent a faecal immunochemical test. All patients were investigated regardless of faecal immunochemical test return or result. Demographics and clinical outcomes such as colorectal cancer prevalence were compared between those who returned a faecal immunochemical test and non-returners.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 7345 patients included in the study, 874 (11.9%) did not return a faecal immunochemical test. Non-returner characteristics included male sex (P = 0.040), younger age (median age 57 versus 65 years, P < 0.001), per rectal bleeding (P < 0.001) and lower socioeconomic status (median Scottish Index of Multiple Deprivation, 6 versus 7, P < 0.001) compared with those who returned a faecal immunochemical test. Of 6294 patients undergoing colorectal investigation, there was a greater prevalence of colorectal cancer (5.4% versus 3.6% P = 0.032) and significant bowel pathology than in the non-returners (15.3% versus 9.8%, P < 0.001). With a median follow-up of 25 months, the colorectal cancer prevalence for the entire 7345 cohort was equal between those who returned and did not return a faecal immunochemical test (3.2% versus 3.8%, P = 0.108). Of note, the non-returners diagnosed with colorectal cancer were younger (median age 64 versus 73 years, P < 0.001) and from a lower socioeconomic area (median Scottish Index of Multiple Deprivation 4 versus 7, P = 0.015) than faecal immunochemical test returners.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Patients referred to secondary care, with symptoms suspicious of colorectal cancer, that did not return a faecal immunochemical test had a similar colorectal cancer prevalence to those that returned the test.</p>","PeriodicalId":9028,"journal":{"name":"BJS Open","volume":"8 5","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.5,"publicationDate":"2024-09-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11474236/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142457410","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Preferences of patients and surgeons regarding counselling before pancreatectomy: 4PC trial. 患者和外科医生对胰腺切除术前咨询的偏好:4PC 试验。
IF 3.5 3区 医学 Q1 SURGERY Pub Date : 2024-09-03 DOI: 10.1093/bjsopen/zrae128
Antonie Willner, Olga Radulova-Mauersberger, Anuschka Barenbrock, Marius Distler, Sandra Korn, Rolidy Jimenez, Mara R Goetz, F Guentac Uzunoglu, Tina Groß, Benjamin Muessle, Thilo Hackert, Juergen Weitz, Thilo Welsch
{"title":"Preferences of patients and surgeons regarding counselling before pancreatectomy: 4PC trial.","authors":"Antonie Willner, Olga Radulova-Mauersberger, Anuschka Barenbrock, Marius Distler, Sandra Korn, Rolidy Jimenez, Mara R Goetz, F Guentac Uzunoglu, Tina Groß, Benjamin Muessle, Thilo Hackert, Juergen Weitz, Thilo Welsch","doi":"10.1093/bjsopen/zrae128","DOIUrl":"10.1093/bjsopen/zrae128","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":9028,"journal":{"name":"BJS Open","volume":"8 5","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.5,"publicationDate":"2024-09-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11494370/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142457424","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Parathyroid gland identification and angiography classification using simple machine learning methods. 使用简单的机器学习方法进行甲状旁腺识别和血管造影分类。
IF 3.5 3区 医学 Q1 SURGERY Pub Date : 2024-09-03 DOI: 10.1093/bjsopen/zrae122
Philip D McEntee, Joseph E Greevy, Frédéric Triponez, Marco S Demarchi, Ronan A Cahill

Background: Near-infrared indocyanine green angiography allows experienced surgeons to reliably evaluate parathyroid gland vitality during thyroid and parathyroid operations in order to predict postoperative function. To facilitate equal performance between surgeons, we developed an automatic computational quantification method using computer vision that portrays expert interpretation of visualized parathyroid gland near-infrared indocyanine green angiographic fluorescence signals.

Methods: Near-infrared indocyanine green-parathyroid gland angiography video recordings (Fluobeam® LX, Fluoptics, Grenoble-part of Getinge-Göteborg) from patients undergoing endocrine cervical surgery in a high-volume unit were used for model development. Computation (MATLAB, Mathworks, Ireland) included segmentation-identification of the parathyroid gland (by autofluorescence), image stabilization (by linear translation) and adjusted time-fluorescence intensity profile generation. Relative upslope and maximum intensity ratios then trained a simple logistic regression model based on expert interpretation and outcome (including hypoparathyroidism), with subsequent unseen testing for validation.

Results: The model was trained on 37 patient videos (45 glands, 29 judged well perfused by parathyroid gland angiography experts), achieving feature data separation with 100% accuracy, and tested on 22 unseen videos (27 glands, 15 judged well perfused), including four in real time. Segmentation-guided parathyroid gland detection correctly identified all parathyroid glands during unseen testing along with three additional non-parathyroid gland regions (90% positive predictive value). Subsequent time-fluorescence intensity profile extraction with vitality prediction was shown feasible in all cases within 5 min, with a 96.3% model accuracy (sensitivity and specificity were 93.3 and 100% respectively) when compared with expert judgement.

Conclusion: Automatic parathyroid gland perfusion quantification using simple machine learning computational methods discriminates parathyroid gland perfusion in concordance with expert surgeon interpretation, providing a means for near-infrared indocyanine green-parathyroid gland signal evaluation.

背景:在甲状腺和甲状旁腺手术过程中,经验丰富的外科医生可以通过近红外吲哚青绿血管造影术可靠地评估甲状旁腺的活力,从而预测术后功能。为了促进外科医生之间的平等表现,我们开发了一种利用计算机视觉的自动计算量化方法,该方法可描述专家对可视化甲状旁腺近红外吲哚青绿血管造影荧光信号的解释:方法:使用在高容量单位接受颈部内分泌手术的患者的近红外吲哚菁绿-甲状旁腺血管造影视频记录(Fluobeam® LX,Fluoptics,Grenoble-Getinge-Göteborg的一部分)进行模型开发。计算(MATLAB,Mathworks,爱尔兰)包括甲状旁腺的分割识别(通过自发荧光)、图像稳定(通过线性平移)和调整时间-荧光强度曲线生成。然后,根据专家的解释和结果(包括甲状旁腺功能减退)对相对上斜率和最大强度比进行简单的逻辑回归模型训练,并随后进行未见测试进行验证:该模型在 37 个患者视频(45 个腺体,29 个被甲状旁腺血管造影专家判定为灌注良好)上进行了训练,特征数据分离准确率达到 100%,并在 22 个未见视频(27 个腺体,15 个被判定为灌注良好)上进行了测试,其中包括 4 个实时视频。在未见测试中,分割引导的甲状旁腺检测正确识别了所有甲状旁腺以及另外三个非甲状旁腺区域(阳性预测值为 90%)。随后的时间-荧光强度曲线提取和活力预测在 5 分钟内对所有病例都是可行的,与专家判断相比,模型准确率为 96.3%(灵敏度和特异性分别为 93.3% 和 100% ):结论:使用简单的机器学习计算方法自动量化甲状旁腺灌注,与外科医生的专业判断一致,为近红外吲哚青绿-甲状旁腺信号评估提供了一种方法。
{"title":"Parathyroid gland identification and angiography classification using simple machine learning methods.","authors":"Philip D McEntee, Joseph E Greevy, Frédéric Triponez, Marco S Demarchi, Ronan A Cahill","doi":"10.1093/bjsopen/zrae122","DOIUrl":"10.1093/bjsopen/zrae122","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Near-infrared indocyanine green angiography allows experienced surgeons to reliably evaluate parathyroid gland vitality during thyroid and parathyroid operations in order to predict postoperative function. To facilitate equal performance between surgeons, we developed an automatic computational quantification method using computer vision that portrays expert interpretation of visualized parathyroid gland near-infrared indocyanine green angiographic fluorescence signals.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Near-infrared indocyanine green-parathyroid gland angiography video recordings (Fluobeam® LX, Fluoptics, Grenoble-part of Getinge-Göteborg) from patients undergoing endocrine cervical surgery in a high-volume unit were used for model development. Computation (MATLAB, Mathworks, Ireland) included segmentation-identification of the parathyroid gland (by autofluorescence), image stabilization (by linear translation) and adjusted time-fluorescence intensity profile generation. Relative upslope and maximum intensity ratios then trained a simple logistic regression model based on expert interpretation and outcome (including hypoparathyroidism), with subsequent unseen testing for validation.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The model was trained on 37 patient videos (45 glands, 29 judged well perfused by parathyroid gland angiography experts), achieving feature data separation with 100% accuracy, and tested on 22 unseen videos (27 glands, 15 judged well perfused), including four in real time. Segmentation-guided parathyroid gland detection correctly identified all parathyroid glands during unseen testing along with three additional non-parathyroid gland regions (90% positive predictive value). Subsequent time-fluorescence intensity profile extraction with vitality prediction was shown feasible in all cases within 5 min, with a 96.3% model accuracy (sensitivity and specificity were 93.3 and 100% respectively) when compared with expert judgement.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Automatic parathyroid gland perfusion quantification using simple machine learning computational methods discriminates parathyroid gland perfusion in concordance with expert surgeon interpretation, providing a means for near-infrared indocyanine green-parathyroid gland signal evaluation.</p>","PeriodicalId":9028,"journal":{"name":"BJS Open","volume":"8 5","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.5,"publicationDate":"2024-09-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11518927/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142520942","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Anastomotic leak after manual circular stapled left-sided bowel surgery: analysis of technology-, disease-, and patient-related factors. 手动环形订书机左侧肠道手术后的吻合口漏:技术、疾病和患者相关因素分析。
IF 3.5 3区 医学 Q1 SURGERY Pub Date : 2024-09-03 DOI: 10.1093/bjsopen/zrae089

Background: Anastomotic leak rates after colorectal surgery remain high. In most left-sided colon and rectal resection surgeries, a circular stapler is utilized to create the primary bowel anastomosis. However, it remains unclear whether a relationship between circular stapler technology and anastomotic leak in left-sided colorectal surgery exists.

Methods: A post-hoc analysis was conducted using a prospectively collected data set of patients from the 2017 European Society of Coloproctology snapshot audit who underwent elective left-sided resection (left hemicolectomy, sigmoid colectomy, or rectal resection) with a manual circular stapled anastomosis. Rates of anastomotic leak and unplanned intensive care unit stay in association with manual circular stapling were assessed. Patient-, disease-, geographical-, and surgeon-related factors as well as stapler brand were explored using multivariable regression models to identify predictors of adverse outcomes.

Results: Across 3305 procedures, 8.0% of patients had an anastomotic leak and 2.1% had an unplanned intensive care unit stay. Independent predictors of anastomotic leak were male sex, minimal-access surgery converted to open surgery, and anastomosis height C11 (lower third rectum) (all P < 0.050). Independent predictors of unplanned intensive care unit stay were minimal-access surgery converted to open surgery and American Society of Anesthesiologists grade IV (all P < 0.050). Stapler device brand was not a predictor of anastomotic leak or unplanned intensive care unit stay in multivariable regression analysis. There were no differences in rates of anastomotic leak and unplanned intensive care unit stay according to stapler head diameter, geographical region, or surgeon experience.

Conclusion: In patients undergoing left-sided bowel anastomosis, choice of manual circular stapler, in terms of manufacturer or head diameter, is not associated with rates of anastomotic leak and unplanned intensive care unit stay.

背景:结肠直肠手术后的吻合口漏率居高不下。在大多数左侧结肠和直肠切除手术中,都会使用环形订书机来进行主肠吻合。然而,左侧结直肠手术中圆形订书机技术与吻合口漏之间是否存在关系仍不清楚:利用 2017 年欧洲结直肠学会快照审计中前瞻性收集的患者数据集进行了一项事后分析,这些患者接受了选择性左侧切除术(左半结肠切除术、乙状结肠切除术或直肠切除术),并进行了手动环形订书机吻合术。评估了与手动环形订书机吻合相关的吻合口漏率和非计划重症监护室住院率。使用多变量回归模型探讨了患者、疾病、地域和外科医生相关因素以及订书机品牌,以确定不良后果的预测因素:在3305例手术中,8.0%的患者出现吻合口漏,2.1%的患者意外入住重症监护室。吻合口漏的独立预测因素为男性、最小入路手术转为开放手术以及吻合口高度C11(直肠下三分之一处)(P均<0.050)。计划外重症监护室住院的独立预测因素是最小入路手术转为开放手术和美国麻醉医师协会 IV 级(所有 P < 0.050)。在多变量回归分析中,订书机设备品牌不是吻合口漏或非计划重症监护病房住院的预测因素。根据订书机头部直径、地理区域或外科医生经验的不同,吻合口漏和非计划重症监护病房住院率也没有差异:结论:在接受左侧肠吻合术的患者中,手动圆形订书机的制造商或订书机头直径与吻合口漏率和非计划重症监护病房住院时间无关。
{"title":"Anastomotic leak after manual circular stapled left-sided bowel surgery: analysis of technology-, disease-, and patient-related factors.","authors":"","doi":"10.1093/bjsopen/zrae089","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1093/bjsopen/zrae089","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Anastomotic leak rates after colorectal surgery remain high. In most left-sided colon and rectal resection surgeries, a circular stapler is utilized to create the primary bowel anastomosis. However, it remains unclear whether a relationship between circular stapler technology and anastomotic leak in left-sided colorectal surgery exists.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A post-hoc analysis was conducted using a prospectively collected data set of patients from the 2017 European Society of Coloproctology snapshot audit who underwent elective left-sided resection (left hemicolectomy, sigmoid colectomy, or rectal resection) with a manual circular stapled anastomosis. Rates of anastomotic leak and unplanned intensive care unit stay in association with manual circular stapling were assessed. Patient-, disease-, geographical-, and surgeon-related factors as well as stapler brand were explored using multivariable regression models to identify predictors of adverse outcomes.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Across 3305 procedures, 8.0% of patients had an anastomotic leak and 2.1% had an unplanned intensive care unit stay. Independent predictors of anastomotic leak were male sex, minimal-access surgery converted to open surgery, and anastomosis height C11 (lower third rectum) (all P < 0.050). Independent predictors of unplanned intensive care unit stay were minimal-access surgery converted to open surgery and American Society of Anesthesiologists grade IV (all P < 0.050). Stapler device brand was not a predictor of anastomotic leak or unplanned intensive care unit stay in multivariable regression analysis. There were no differences in rates of anastomotic leak and unplanned intensive care unit stay according to stapler head diameter, geographical region, or surgeon experience.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>In patients undergoing left-sided bowel anastomosis, choice of manual circular stapler, in terms of manufacturer or head diameter, is not associated with rates of anastomotic leak and unplanned intensive care unit stay.</p>","PeriodicalId":9028,"journal":{"name":"BJS Open","volume":"8 5","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.5,"publicationDate":"2024-09-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11498054/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142494664","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Effect of radiotherapy on long-term quality of life in recurrence-free rectal cancer survivors (LaTE study): nationwide inverse probability of treatment-weighted registry-based cohort study and survey. 放疗对无复发直肠癌幸存者长期生活质量的影响(LaTE 研究):全国范围内基于治疗的反概率登记加权队列研究和调查。
IF 3.5 3区 医学 Q1 SURGERY Pub Date : 2024-09-03 DOI: 10.1093/bjsopen/zrae091
Yasir G Malik, Jūratė Šaltytė Benth, Hanne M Hamre, Arne E Færden, Johannes K Schultz

Background: Radiotherapy reduces local recurrence in locally advanced rectal cancer, but may cause harm in patients who do not experience recurrence. The aim was to investigate the impact of radiotherapy on long-term quality of life after curative treatment for rectal cancer, i.e. in patients without a recurrence during the follow-up.

Methods: All patients operated on for rectal cancer in Norway under 75 years of age between 30 September 2007 and 1 October 2020 were identified using the Cancer Registry of Norway. Exclusion criteria were distant metastasis, recurrence and dementia. The primary outcome measure was the Gastrointestinal Quality of Life Index. Secondary outcome measures included the 36-item Short Form Survey. Inverse probability weights based on a multiple logistic regression model were used to balance prechosen covariates between the radiotherapy and no radiotherapy groups when assessing differences in outcomes.

Results: Of 5014 invited patients, 2142 (43%) eligible patients answered the questionnaires. Of these 762 (36%) were treated with neoadjuvant radiotherapy plus surgery and 1380 (64%) with surgery alone. The mean follow-up time was 6.4 and 7.4 years respectively. After propensity score matching, the Gastrointestinal Quality of Life Index differed significantly between irradiated and non-irradiated patients ((mean(s.d.), mean score 103.8(19.4) versus 110.8(19.6) respectively, mean difference: -6.96 (95% c.i. -8.72 to -5.19); P < 0.001). Among patients without a stoma the mean difference was -8.1 points, whereas it was -5.7 for patients with a stoma. The radiotherapy group also scored significantly lower in 7 of 8 36-item Short Form Survey domains compared with the surgery alone group.

Conclusion: Long-term quality of life was significantly lower in patients without a recurrence during the follow-up who received radiotherapy compared with patients who did not. These findings warrant a critical re-evaluation of the use of radiotherapy both in traditional neoadjuvant treatment and in modern organ-preserving treatment regimens.

背景:放疗可减少局部晚期直肠癌的局部复发,但可能对未复发的患者造成伤害。该研究旨在调查放疗对直肠癌根治性治疗后(即随访期间未复发的患者)长期生活质量的影响:方法:通过挪威癌症登记处对2007年9月30日至2020年10月1日期间在挪威接受直肠癌手术的所有75岁以下患者进行识别。排除标准为远处转移、复发和痴呆。主要结果指标为胃肠道生活质量指数。次要结果测量包括 36 项简表调查。在评估结果差异时,采用基于多元逻辑回归模型的逆概率权重来平衡放疗组和未放疗组之间的预选协变量:在 5014 名受邀患者中,有 2142 名(43%)符合条件的患者回答了问卷。其中762人(36%)接受了新辅助放疗加手术治疗,1380人(64%)接受了单纯手术治疗。平均随访时间分别为 6.4 年和 7.4 年。经过倾向评分匹配后,接受放射治疗和未接受放射治疗的患者的胃肠道生活质量指数有显著差异(平均值(s.d.),平均分分别为 103.8(19.4)和 110.8(19.6),平均差异为-6.96(95% c.d.)):-6.96(95% 置信区间:-8.72 至-5.19);P < 0.001)。无造口患者的平均差异为-8.1分,而有造口患者为-5.7分。与单纯手术组相比,放疗组在8个36项简表调查领域中的7个领域的得分也明显较低:结论:与未接受放射治疗的患者相比,随访期间未复发的患者的长期生活质量明显较低。这些发现表明,无论是在传统的新辅助治疗中,还是在现代的保留器官治疗方案中,都需要对放疗的使用进行严格的重新评估。
{"title":"Effect of radiotherapy on long-term quality of life in recurrence-free rectal cancer survivors (LaTE study): nationwide inverse probability of treatment-weighted registry-based cohort study and survey.","authors":"Yasir G Malik, Jūratė Šaltytė Benth, Hanne M Hamre, Arne E Færden, Johannes K Schultz","doi":"10.1093/bjsopen/zrae091","DOIUrl":"10.1093/bjsopen/zrae091","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Radiotherapy reduces local recurrence in locally advanced rectal cancer, but may cause harm in patients who do not experience recurrence. The aim was to investigate the impact of radiotherapy on long-term quality of life after curative treatment for rectal cancer, i.e. in patients without a recurrence during the follow-up.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>All patients operated on for rectal cancer in Norway under 75 years of age between 30 September 2007 and 1 October 2020 were identified using the Cancer Registry of Norway. Exclusion criteria were distant metastasis, recurrence and dementia. The primary outcome measure was the Gastrointestinal Quality of Life Index. Secondary outcome measures included the 36-item Short Form Survey. Inverse probability weights based on a multiple logistic regression model were used to balance prechosen covariates between the radiotherapy and no radiotherapy groups when assessing differences in outcomes.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 5014 invited patients, 2142 (43%) eligible patients answered the questionnaires. Of these 762 (36%) were treated with neoadjuvant radiotherapy plus surgery and 1380 (64%) with surgery alone. The mean follow-up time was 6.4 and 7.4 years respectively. After propensity score matching, the Gastrointestinal Quality of Life Index differed significantly between irradiated and non-irradiated patients ((mean(s.d.), mean score 103.8(19.4) versus 110.8(19.6) respectively, mean difference: -6.96 (95% c.i. -8.72 to -5.19); P < 0.001). Among patients without a stoma the mean difference was -8.1 points, whereas it was -5.7 for patients with a stoma. The radiotherapy group also scored significantly lower in 7 of 8 36-item Short Form Survey domains compared with the surgery alone group.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Long-term quality of life was significantly lower in patients without a recurrence during the follow-up who received radiotherapy compared with patients who did not. These findings warrant a critical re-evaluation of the use of radiotherapy both in traditional neoadjuvant treatment and in modern organ-preserving treatment regimens.</p>","PeriodicalId":9028,"journal":{"name":"BJS Open","volume":"8 5","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.5,"publicationDate":"2024-09-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11378401/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142139243","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Research priorities in pancreatic surgery. 胰腺外科的研究重点。
IF 3.5 3区 医学 Q1 SURGERY Pub Date : 2024-09-03 DOI: 10.1093/bjsopen/zrae106
Magdalena Holze, Anna Zlatopolskaia, Frank Pianka, Thomas Pausch, Markus K Diener, Pia Antony, Martin Loos, Christoph W Michalski, Rosa Klotz, Pascal Probst
{"title":"Research priorities in pancreatic surgery.","authors":"Magdalena Holze, Anna Zlatopolskaia, Frank Pianka, Thomas Pausch, Markus K Diener, Pia Antony, Martin Loos, Christoph W Michalski, Rosa Klotz, Pascal Probst","doi":"10.1093/bjsopen/zrae106","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1093/bjsopen/zrae106","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":9028,"journal":{"name":"BJS Open","volume":"8 5","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.5,"publicationDate":"2024-09-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11421461/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142336292","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Operative versus conservative management for inguinal hernia: a methodology scoping review of randomized controlled trials. 腹股沟疝气的手术治疗与保守治疗:随机对照试验方法学范围综述。
IF 3.5 3区 医学 Q1 SURGERY Pub Date : 2024-09-03 DOI: 10.1093/bjsopen/zrae116
Maria Picciochi, Matthew J Lee, Samir Pathak, Jessica Banks, Jack A Helliwell, Stephen J Chapman, Neil Smart, Katy Chalmers, Sian Cousins, Natalie Blencowe

Introduction: There is a lack of consensus on the management of inguinal hernia with limited symptoms. To address this issue a systematic review of existing randomized clinical trials (RCTs) was performed to critically appraise all existing data on asymptomatic hernia management, focusing on generalizability.

Methods: A scoping review to identify all RCTs comparing surgical and conservative management of patients with inguinal hernias was undertaken. Medline, Embase, Cochrane and ClinicalTrials.gov databases were searched. Data collected included study characteristics and definitions of population, intervention/comparator, and outcomes; and limitations of each study were also extracted. The quality and generalizability of included RCTs were evaluated using Cochrane's ROB-2 and the PRECIS-2 tool, respectively.

Results: Searches returned 661 papers; 14 full-text papers were assessed and three RCTs were identified. All RCTs included only male patients with a mean age above 55 years. All RCTs included asymptomatic patients and two included those with minimal symptoms. Different definitions for 'minimally symptomatic' were used in RCTs and none provided details of what was meant by conservative treatment. Follow-up periods varied between studies (1, 2, 3 years). All RCTs had an overall high risk of bias. According to PRECIS-2, two RCTs were classified as pragmatic, and one was equally pragmatic and explanatory.

Discussion: This systematic review highlights a high risk of bias but a good generalizability of the findings from the RCTs conducted on minimally symptomatic inguinal hernia patients. To improve the guidelines for the management of this group of patients, more generalizable data are needed.

导言:对于症状有限的腹股沟斜疝的治疗,目前尚缺乏共识。为了解决这一问题,我们对现有的随机临床试验(RCT)进行了系统性回顾,对所有关于无症状疝气治疗的现有数据进行了严格评估,重点关注可推广性:方法:进行了一次范围界定审查,以确定所有对腹股沟疝患者进行手术和保守治疗比较的 RCT。检索了 Medline、Embase、Cochrane 和 ClinicalTrials.gov 数据库。收集的数据包括研究特点和人群、干预/比较者和结果的定义;还提取了每项研究的局限性。使用 Cochrane 的 ROB-2 和 PRECIS-2 工具分别评估了纳入的 RCT 的质量和可推广性:结果:通过检索,共检索到 661 篇论文;对 14 篇论文进行了全文评估,并确定了 3 项研究性临床试验。所有研究性临床试验都只纳入了平均年龄在 55 岁以上的男性患者。所有研究都包括无症状的患者,其中两项研究包括症状轻微的患者。研究中对 "症状轻微 "的定义各不相同,没有一项研究详细说明了保守治疗的含义。不同研究的随访时间各不相同(1 年、2 年、3 年)。所有 RCT 的总体偏倚风险都很高。根据 PRECIS-2,两项研究被归类为实用性研究,一项研究的实用性和解释性相同:讨论:本系统综述强调了针对症状轻微的腹股沟疝患者进行的研究性临床试验的高偏倚风险,但研究结果具有良好的普遍性。要改进这类患者的治疗指南,需要更多可推广的数据。
{"title":"Operative versus conservative management for inguinal hernia: a methodology scoping review of randomized controlled trials.","authors":"Maria Picciochi, Matthew J Lee, Samir Pathak, Jessica Banks, Jack A Helliwell, Stephen J Chapman, Neil Smart, Katy Chalmers, Sian Cousins, Natalie Blencowe","doi":"10.1093/bjsopen/zrae116","DOIUrl":"10.1093/bjsopen/zrae116","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>There is a lack of consensus on the management of inguinal hernia with limited symptoms. To address this issue a systematic review of existing randomized clinical trials (RCTs) was performed to critically appraise all existing data on asymptomatic hernia management, focusing on generalizability.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A scoping review to identify all RCTs comparing surgical and conservative management of patients with inguinal hernias was undertaken. Medline, Embase, Cochrane and ClinicalTrials.gov databases were searched. Data collected included study characteristics and definitions of population, intervention/comparator, and outcomes; and limitations of each study were also extracted. The quality and generalizability of included RCTs were evaluated using Cochrane's ROB-2 and the PRECIS-2 tool, respectively.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Searches returned 661 papers; 14 full-text papers were assessed and three RCTs were identified. All RCTs included only male patients with a mean age above 55 years. All RCTs included asymptomatic patients and two included those with minimal symptoms. Different definitions for 'minimally symptomatic' were used in RCTs and none provided details of what was meant by conservative treatment. Follow-up periods varied between studies (1, 2, 3 years). All RCTs had an overall high risk of bias. According to PRECIS-2, two RCTs were classified as pragmatic, and one was equally pragmatic and explanatory.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>This systematic review highlights a high risk of bias but a good generalizability of the findings from the RCTs conducted on minimally symptomatic inguinal hernia patients. To improve the guidelines for the management of this group of patients, more generalizable data are needed.</p>","PeriodicalId":9028,"journal":{"name":"BJS Open","volume":"8 5","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.5,"publicationDate":"2024-09-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11421466/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142341081","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
期刊
BJS Open
全部 Acc. Chem. Res. ACS Applied Bio Materials ACS Appl. Electron. Mater. ACS Appl. Energy Mater. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces ACS Appl. Nano Mater. ACS Appl. Polym. Mater. ACS BIOMATER-SCI ENG ACS Catal. ACS Cent. Sci. ACS Chem. Biol. ACS Chemical Health & Safety ACS Chem. Neurosci. ACS Comb. Sci. ACS Earth Space Chem. ACS Energy Lett. ACS Infect. Dis. ACS Macro Lett. ACS Mater. Lett. ACS Med. Chem. Lett. ACS Nano ACS Omega ACS Photonics ACS Sens. ACS Sustainable Chem. Eng. ACS Synth. Biol. Anal. Chem. BIOCHEMISTRY-US Bioconjugate Chem. BIOMACROMOLECULES Chem. Res. Toxicol. Chem. Rev. Chem. Mater. CRYST GROWTH DES ENERG FUEL Environ. Sci. Technol. Environ. Sci. Technol. Lett. Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. IND ENG CHEM RES Inorg. Chem. J. Agric. Food. Chem. J. Chem. Eng. Data J. Chem. Educ. J. Chem. Inf. Model. J. Chem. Theory Comput. J. Med. Chem. J. Nat. Prod. J PROTEOME RES J. Am. Chem. Soc. LANGMUIR MACROMOLECULES Mol. Pharmaceutics Nano Lett. Org. Lett. ORG PROCESS RES DEV ORGANOMETALLICS J. Org. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. A J. Phys. Chem. B J. Phys. Chem. C J. Phys. Chem. Lett. Analyst Anal. Methods Biomater. Sci. Catal. Sci. Technol. Chem. Commun. Chem. Soc. Rev. CHEM EDUC RES PRACT CRYSTENGCOMM Dalton Trans. Energy Environ. Sci. ENVIRON SCI-NANO ENVIRON SCI-PROC IMP ENVIRON SCI-WAT RES Faraday Discuss. Food Funct. Green Chem. Inorg. Chem. Front. Integr. Biol. J. Anal. At. Spectrom. J. Mater. Chem. A J. Mater. Chem. B J. Mater. Chem. C Lab Chip Mater. Chem. Front. Mater. Horiz. MEDCHEMCOMM Metallomics Mol. Biosyst. Mol. Syst. Des. Eng. Nanoscale Nanoscale Horiz. Nat. Prod. Rep. New J. Chem. Org. Biomol. Chem. Org. Chem. Front. PHOTOCH PHOTOBIO SCI PCCP Polym. Chem.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1