Pub Date : 2014-12-01DOI: 10.1192/pb.bp.113.044321
Claudia Murton, Michael Cooper, Stephen Dinniss, Shon Roberts, Nicola Booth, Paul Newell
Aims and method To assess whether a home treatment team acute relapse prevention (ARP) strategy reduces admissions to hospital with mania. A retrospective design was used to analyse records for manic admissions since 2002. The number and length of admissions and detentions pre- and post-ARP were determined and rates of admissions and detentions calculated from this. Results We found reductions in admission and detention rates following the introduction of the ARP: 0.3 fewer admissions per person per year (95% bootstrap CI 0.09-0.62) and 0.25 fewer detentions per person per year (95% bootstrap CI 0.0-0.48). Wilcoxon signed-rank tests gave P<0.0001. Clinical implications A person-centred care plan such as the ARP which enables quick action in response to relapse-warning signs of mania appears to reduce rates of admission to hospital. The ARP could be used anywhere in the UK and fits with current mental health policy.
{"title":"Does a home treatment acute relapse prevention strategy reduce admissions for people with mania in bipolar affective disorder?","authors":"Claudia Murton, Michael Cooper, Stephen Dinniss, Shon Roberts, Nicola Booth, Paul Newell","doi":"10.1192/pb.bp.113.044321","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1192/pb.bp.113.044321","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Aims and method To assess whether a home treatment team acute relapse prevention (ARP) strategy reduces admissions to hospital with mania. A retrospective design was used to analyse records for manic admissions since 2002. The number and length of admissions and detentions pre- and post-ARP were determined and rates of admissions and detentions calculated from this. Results We found reductions in admission and detention rates following the introduction of the ARP: 0.3 fewer admissions per person per year (95% bootstrap CI 0.09-0.62) and 0.25 fewer detentions per person per year (95% bootstrap CI 0.0-0.48). Wilcoxon signed-rank tests gave P<0.0001. Clinical implications A person-centred care plan such as the ARP which enables quick action in response to relapse-warning signs of mania appears to reduce rates of admission to hospital. The ARP could be used anywhere in the UK and fits with current mental health policy. </p>","PeriodicalId":90710,"journal":{"name":"Psychiatric bulletin (2014)","volume":"38 6","pages":"276-80"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2014-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1192/pb.bp.113.044321","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"32908256","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2014-12-01DOI: 10.1192/pb.bp.113.045955
David Yeomans, Kate Dale, Kate Beedle
Aims and method People with severe mental illness (SMI) die relatively young, with mortality rates four times higher than average, mainly from natural causes, including heart disease. We developed a computer-based physical health screening template for use with primary care information systems and evaluated its introduction across a whole city against standards recommended by the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence for physical health and cardiovascular risk screening. Results A significant proportion of SMI patients were excluded from the SMI register and only a third of people on the register had an annual physical health check recorded. The screening template was taken up by 75% of GP practices and was associated with better quality screening than usual care, doubling the rate of cardiovascular risk recording and the early detection of high cardiovascular risk. Clinical implications A computerised annual physical health screening template can be introduced to clinical information systems to improve quality of care.
{"title":"Systematic computerised cardiovascular health screening for people with severe mental illness.","authors":"David Yeomans, Kate Dale, Kate Beedle","doi":"10.1192/pb.bp.113.045955","DOIUrl":"10.1192/pb.bp.113.045955","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Aims and method People with severe mental illness (SMI) die relatively young, with mortality rates four times higher than average, mainly from natural causes, including heart disease. We developed a computer-based physical health screening template for use with primary care information systems and evaluated its introduction across a whole city against standards recommended by the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence for physical health and cardiovascular risk screening. Results A significant proportion of SMI patients were excluded from the SMI register and only a third of people on the register had an annual physical health check recorded. The screening template was taken up by 75% of GP practices and was associated with better quality screening than usual care, doubling the rate of cardiovascular risk recording and the early detection of high cardiovascular risk. Clinical implications A computerised annual physical health screening template can be introduced to clinical information systems to improve quality of care. </p>","PeriodicalId":90710,"journal":{"name":"Psychiatric bulletin (2014)","volume":"38 6","pages":"280-4"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2014-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4248164/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"32908257","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2014-12-01DOI: 10.1192/pb.bp.114.049809
Julia Bland
Simon Sinclair’s dark beady eyes confront the onlooker like a spiky intelligent bird, looking for a worm to pounce on. Useful in the context of a participant-observer study of medical acculturation which he published as Making Doctors (1997). This laser beam of anthropological analysis was
{"title":"Profile: dr simon sinclair.","authors":"Julia Bland","doi":"10.1192/pb.bp.114.049809","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1192/pb.bp.114.049809","url":null,"abstract":"Simon Sinclair’s dark beady eyes confront the onlooker like a spiky intelligent bird, looking for a worm to pounce on. Useful in the context of a participant-observer study of medical acculturation which he published as Making Doctors (1997). This laser beam of anthropological analysis was","PeriodicalId":90710,"journal":{"name":"Psychiatric bulletin (2014)","volume":"38 6","pages":"303-5"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2014-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1192/pb.bp.114.049809","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"32908262","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2014-12-01DOI: 10.1192/pb.bp.113.045252
Alan Meaden, Martin Commander, Colin Cowan, Tom Edwards
Aims and method To build on previous research findings by examining engagement and problematic behaviours of patients in 10 residential rehabilitation units. Two measures were completed on patients in community rehabilitation, longer-term complex care and high-dependency units (109 patients in total). Data were analysed and categorised into higher-engagement ratings across the domains of engagement and behaviour over the past 6 months and lifetime in terms of presence of the behaviour and likelihood of resulting harm. Results Data were available for 73% of patients. All aspects of engagement were consistently low for all units, with highest levels in community rehabilitation units. Levels of problematic behaviours were similar across all units. Socially inappropriate behaviours and failure to complete everyday activities were evident for over half of all patients and higher for lifetime prevalence. Verbal aggression was at significantly lower levels in community units. Lifetime behaviours likely to lead to harm were much more evident in high-dependency units. Clinical implications Despite some benefits of this type of care, patients continue to present challenges in engagement and problematic behaviours that require new approaches and a change in focus.
{"title":"Patient engagement and problematic behaviours in nurse-staffed residential rehabilitation units.","authors":"Alan Meaden, Martin Commander, Colin Cowan, Tom Edwards","doi":"10.1192/pb.bp.113.045252","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1192/pb.bp.113.045252","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Aims and method To build on previous research findings by examining engagement and problematic behaviours of patients in 10 residential rehabilitation units. Two measures were completed on patients in community rehabilitation, longer-term complex care and high-dependency units (109 patients in total). Data were analysed and categorised into higher-engagement ratings across the domains of engagement and behaviour over the past 6 months and lifetime in terms of presence of the behaviour and likelihood of resulting harm. Results Data were available for 73% of patients. All aspects of engagement were consistently low for all units, with highest levels in community rehabilitation units. Levels of problematic behaviours were similar across all units. Socially inappropriate behaviours and failure to complete everyday activities were evident for over half of all patients and higher for lifetime prevalence. Verbal aggression was at significantly lower levels in community units. Lifetime behaviours likely to lead to harm were much more evident in high-dependency units. Clinical implications Despite some benefits of this type of care, patients continue to present challenges in engagement and problematic behaviours that require new approaches and a change in focus. </p>","PeriodicalId":90710,"journal":{"name":"Psychiatric bulletin (2014)","volume":"38 6","pages":"260-4"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2014-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1192/pb.bp.113.045252","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"32905584","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2014-12-01DOI: 10.1192/pb.bp.113.045054
Sucharita Yarlagadda, Daniel Maughan, Susie Lingwood, Phil Davison
Demands on our mental health services are growing as financial pressures increase. In addition, there are regular changes to service design and commissioning. The current political mantra is 'more and more, of better quality, for less and less, please'. We suggest that mental health services need to actively respond to these constraints and that clinical transformation is needed to move towards a more sustainable system of healthcare. Emphasis on prevention, patient empowerment and leaner, greener services is required alongside more extensive use of technologies. Focusing on these areas will make mental health services more responsive to the challenges we face and serve to future-proof psychiatry in the UK. Services need to be delivered to provide maximum benefit to the health of our patients, but also to our society and the environment.
{"title":"Sustainable psychiatry in the UK.","authors":"Sucharita Yarlagadda, Daniel Maughan, Susie Lingwood, Phil Davison","doi":"10.1192/pb.bp.113.045054","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1192/pb.bp.113.045054","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Demands on our mental health services are growing as financial pressures increase. In addition, there are regular changes to service design and commissioning. The current political mantra is 'more and more, of better quality, for less and less, please'. We suggest that mental health services need to actively respond to these constraints and that clinical transformation is needed to move towards a more sustainable system of healthcare. Emphasis on prevention, patient empowerment and leaner, greener services is required alongside more extensive use of technologies. Focusing on these areas will make mental health services more responsive to the challenges we face and serve to future-proof psychiatry in the UK. Services need to be delivered to provide maximum benefit to the health of our patients, but also to our society and the environment. </p>","PeriodicalId":90710,"journal":{"name":"Psychiatric bulletin (2014)","volume":"38 6","pages":"285-90"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2014-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1192/pb.bp.113.045054","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"32908258","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
In their service development for medically unexplained symptoms (MUS), Rohricht & Elanjithara1 bring much-needed attention to the problem of developing a service that is both effective and one that patients choose to attend. They highlight that a significant proportion may only engage in a collaborative model at a primary care level. One of the first reasons for this is the terminology prevalent in this field.2 The patients find ‘somatoform’ and ‘medically unexplained’ symptoms unsatisfactory terms which have connotations that ‘it is all in the mind’. They wonder if the low referral rate from some general practitioners (GPs) and the non-attendance by nearly a quarter of patients referred is related to this. When developing pilot services for MUS, we chose to call our service the ‘symptom management clinic’ and locate it within GP surgeries, to avoid prejudicing its acceptability by alignment with mental health hospitals or psychological terminology. On auditing our attendees, many said they ‘would not have attended a clinic located with a mental health provider’ and we achieved high user satisfaction ratings for the ease of accessibility and format of the clinic. We also incorporated the proactive identification that Rohricht & Elanjithara call for. We decided to ‘case find’ and asked GPs in four separate surgeries to identify any patients that had been seen at the surgery more than 10 times in 2 years; had at least two negative diagnostic tests; and were not currently involved with specialist mental health services. We then examined case notes and excluded patients with current diagnostic codes on the GP database. This process was time consuming, although it has future potential to be automated, but it did have the benefit of finding patients who had not been thought by the GP as having MUS but were actually presenting and being referred for repeated investigations without a diagnosis. Similarly, Burton et al3 used repeated referrals to secondary care as a guide and found that ‘at least three times in 5 years’ identified MUS patients with high levels of secondary care usage. In one surgery alone, we identified 17 patients who had 286 out-patient and hospital attendances between them over 2 years with an average cost of £2396/year (range £374–7403). Of these referrals, 13 patients attended a symptom management clinic appointment with a consultant in liaison psychiatry or a consultant clinical neuropsychologist. Involvement of the GP was considered crucial, with a short feedback session with both GP and patient following the clinic to develop a collaborative approach to ongoing management. This also provided a concurrent training benefit for GPs which they valued. A cost analysis of the patient’s healthcare usage before the symptom management clinic and for 2 years following assessment used standard hospital tariff costs and showed a reduction of 48% in secondary care usage alone. We also showed an increase in functioning, as measured by
{"title":"A proactive and acceptable clinic solution for patients with medically unexplained symptoms.","authors":"Joanna S Bromley, Ann Turner","doi":"10.1192/pb.38.6.307a","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1192/pb.38.6.307a","url":null,"abstract":"In their service development for medically unexplained symptoms (MUS), Rohricht & Elanjithara1 bring much-needed attention to the problem of developing a service that is both effective and one that patients choose to attend. They highlight that a significant proportion may only engage in a collaborative model at a primary care level. One of the first reasons for this is the terminology prevalent in this field.2 The patients find ‘somatoform’ and ‘medically unexplained’ symptoms unsatisfactory terms which have connotations that ‘it is all in the mind’. They wonder if the low referral rate from some general practitioners (GPs) and the non-attendance by nearly a quarter of patients referred is related to this. When developing pilot services for MUS, we chose to call our service the ‘symptom management clinic’ and locate it within GP surgeries, to avoid prejudicing its acceptability by alignment with mental health hospitals or psychological terminology. On auditing our attendees, many said they ‘would not have attended a clinic located with a mental health provider’ and we achieved high user satisfaction ratings for the ease of accessibility and format of the clinic. \u0000 \u0000We also incorporated the proactive identification that Rohricht & Elanjithara call for. We decided to ‘case find’ and asked GPs in four separate surgeries to identify any patients that had been seen at the surgery more than 10 times in 2 years; had at least two negative diagnostic tests; and were not currently involved with specialist mental health services. We then examined case notes and excluded patients with current diagnostic codes on the GP database. This process was time consuming, although it has future potential to be automated, but it did have the benefit of finding patients who had not been thought by the GP as having MUS but were actually presenting and being referred for repeated investigations without a diagnosis. Similarly, Burton et al3 used repeated referrals to secondary care as a guide and found that ‘at least three times in 5 years’ identified MUS patients with high levels of secondary care usage. \u0000 \u0000In one surgery alone, we identified 17 patients who had 286 out-patient and hospital attendances between them over 2 years with an average cost of £2396/year (range £374–7403). Of these referrals, 13 patients attended a symptom management clinic appointment with a consultant in liaison psychiatry or a consultant clinical neuropsychologist. Involvement of the GP was considered crucial, with a short feedback session with both GP and patient following the clinic to develop a collaborative approach to ongoing management. This also provided a concurrent training benefit for GPs which they valued. \u0000 \u0000A cost analysis of the patient’s healthcare usage before the symptom management clinic and for 2 years following assessment used standard hospital tariff costs and showed a reduction of 48% in secondary care usage alone. We also showed an increase in functioning, as measured by ","PeriodicalId":90710,"journal":{"name":"Psychiatric bulletin (2014)","volume":"38 6","pages":"307-8"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2014-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1192/pb.38.6.307a","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"32906891","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
We are writing in response to the review by Sabina Dosani your journal had published on Play: Experimental Methodologies in Developmental and Therapeutic Settings, edited by Shubada Maitra & Shekhar Seshadri, Orient Blackswan Private Ltd, 2012, $29.95 (pb), 264 pp., ISBN: 9788125047599. At least, this was the title used in the review that appeared in the Psychiatric Bulletin, April 2014, Volume 38, Issue 2. First and most importantly, the reviewer has the title of the book wrong. The title of the book is: Play: Experiential Methodologies in Developmental and Therapeutic Settings, i.e. the word is ‘experiential’ not ‘experimental’. This is critical as the reviewer has moved on to critiquing the book based on her erroneous understanding that it is about experimental methodologies – which it is not, as stated even in the title! The reviewer says ‘My first gripe with this book is the subtitle: ”Experimental Methodologies in Developmental and Therapeutic Settings”. Readers of this journal know an experiment is a study of cause and effect. It differs from non-experimental methods in that it involves the deliberate manipulation of one variable, while trying to keep all other variables constant. There are no experimental methodologies described in this book.’ Very true that no experimental methodologies are described in this book! The methodologies described are experiential methodologies – as discussed in the introduction, the book invited ‘field practitioners working with children and academicians from the field of child and adolescent mental health to write and share their experiences’ and that ‘This volume maps the tapestry of play across settings, populations and methods’. ‘My second quibble is with this book’s use of the term ”play”. Throughout the text, play means so many disparate things, which are sometimes used as synonyms when they ought not to be. ”Play” encompasses working with creative arts, using child-friendly assessment tools, exploring displacement using puppets, observing children with dolls, engaging them with games and using drama as an educational tool in a school campaign to combat sexism’, says your esteemed reviewer. Why is this a quibble? The objective of the book is to ‘document work with children using various forms of play and art’, and to ‘bring to centre-stage the numerous field based innovations of working with children’ (stated in the introduction). Further, the introduction clearly provides a definition of play: ‘Broadly, the term play includes both structured and unstructured activities ranging from the use of art, puppets, dolls, games, drama and theatre, to songs and music.’ Besides, even at ‘quibble’ stage, the reviewer does not seem to have realised her first error about the title and subject of the book, i.e. she does not seem to have reflected on the fact that it is unlikely that a book on ‘experimental methodologies’ would have been talking about a range of qualitative methods! The reviewe
{"title":"Response to review of Play: Experiential Methodologies.","authors":"Shubhada Maitra, Shekhar Seshadri","doi":"10.1192/pb.38.6.308a","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1192/pb.38.6.308a","url":null,"abstract":"We are writing in response to the review by Sabina Dosani your journal had published on Play: Experimental Methodologies in Developmental and Therapeutic Settings, edited by Shubada Maitra & Shekhar Seshadri, Orient Blackswan Private Ltd, 2012, $29.95 (pb), 264 pp., ISBN: 9788125047599. \u0000 \u0000At least, this was the title used in the review that appeared in the Psychiatric Bulletin, April 2014, Volume 38, Issue 2. \u0000 \u0000First and most importantly, the reviewer has the title of the book wrong. The title of the book is: Play: Experiential Methodologies in Developmental and Therapeutic Settings, i.e. the word is ‘experiential’ not ‘experimental’. This is critical as the reviewer has moved on to critiquing the book based on her erroneous understanding that it is about experimental methodologies – which it is not, as stated even in the title! \u0000 \u0000The reviewer says ‘My first gripe with this book is the subtitle: ”Experimental Methodologies in Developmental and Therapeutic Settings”. Readers of this journal know an experiment is a study of cause and effect. It differs from non-experimental methods in that it involves the deliberate manipulation of one variable, while trying to keep all other variables constant. There are no experimental methodologies described in this book.’ \u0000 \u0000Very true that no experimental methodologies are described in this book! The methodologies described are experiential methodologies – as discussed in the introduction, the book invited ‘field practitioners working with children and academicians from the field of child and adolescent mental health to write and share their experiences’ and that ‘This volume maps the tapestry of play across settings, populations and methods’. \u0000 \u0000‘My second quibble is with this book’s use of the term ”play”. Throughout the text, play means so many disparate things, which are sometimes used as synonyms when they ought not to be. ”Play” encompasses working with creative arts, using child-friendly assessment tools, exploring displacement using puppets, observing children with dolls, engaging them with games and using drama as an educational tool in a school campaign to combat sexism’, says your esteemed reviewer. \u0000 \u0000Why is this a quibble? The objective of the book is to ‘document work with children using various forms of play and art’, and to ‘bring to centre-stage the numerous field based innovations of working with children’ (stated in the introduction). Further, the introduction clearly provides a definition of play: ‘Broadly, the term play includes both structured and unstructured activities ranging from the use of art, puppets, dolls, games, drama and theatre, to songs and music.’ \u0000 \u0000Besides, even at ‘quibble’ stage, the reviewer does not seem to have realised her first error about the title and subject of the book, i.e. she does not seem to have reflected on the fact that it is unlikely that a book on ‘experimental methodologies’ would have been talking about a range of qualitative methods! \u0000 \u0000The reviewe","PeriodicalId":90710,"journal":{"name":"Psychiatric bulletin (2014)","volume":"38 6","pages":"308-9"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2014-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1192/pb.38.6.308a","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"32906893","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2014-12-01DOI: 10.1192/pb.bp.112.040188
Dieneke Hubbeling, Robert Bertram
Aims and method This study investigates patient satisfaction and levels of hope after receiving treatment from a home treatment team. It studies whether distributing questionnaires during the last visit increases the response rate, and explores whether patient satisfaction and levels of hope are associated with particular elements of the care received. Results Patients who answered the questionnaire tended to be satisfied. When forms were distributed during the last visit, the response rate increased to at least 64%. People with negative views were more likely to return the form by post. Patient satisfaction and levels of hope were associated with most elements of received care, and the resolution of problems was predictive of both satisfaction and increased hope in logistic regression. Clinical implications The distribution of service evaluation questionnaires during the last visit increased the response rate considerably. This study suggests that in order to improve services, it is important to focus on whether patients think their problems have been resolved.
{"title":"Hope, happiness and home treatment: a study into patient satisfaction with being treated at home.","authors":"Dieneke Hubbeling, Robert Bertram","doi":"10.1192/pb.bp.112.040188","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1192/pb.bp.112.040188","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Aims and method This study investigates patient satisfaction and levels of hope after receiving treatment from a home treatment team. It studies whether distributing questionnaires during the last visit increases the response rate, and explores whether patient satisfaction and levels of hope are associated with particular elements of the care received. Results Patients who answered the questionnaire tended to be satisfied. When forms were distributed during the last visit, the response rate increased to at least 64%. People with negative views were more likely to return the form by post. Patient satisfaction and levels of hope were associated with most elements of received care, and the resolution of problems was predictive of both satisfaction and increased hope in logistic regression. Clinical implications The distribution of service evaluation questionnaires during the last visit increased the response rate considerably. This study suggests that in order to improve services, it is important to focus on whether patients think their problems have been resolved. </p>","PeriodicalId":90710,"journal":{"name":"Psychiatric bulletin (2014)","volume":"38 6","pages":"265-9"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2014-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1192/pb.bp.112.040188","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"32908254","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2014-12-01DOI: 10.1192/pb.bp.113.045237
Josephine Morgan
Aims and method To provide information regarding the extent to which the process of clustering using the mental health clustering tool captures the complexity of patient need across different geographical areas. Investigation was undertaken via a ‘deep dive’ into patient notes, with data collected on patients allocated to cluster 5, 8 or 13 in three different London boroughs. Results There is evidence for within-cluster differences between patients in different London boroughs in terms of various complexity factors. Further findings in relation to accuracy of clustering suggest some area-specific patterns in terms of clustering practice, raising the possibility that clinicians have different scoring thresholds in different areas. Clinical implications Complexity factors can affect resource use and therefore cost of service provision. In the case of a national tariff, providers of care to more complex patients may be placed at greater financial risk. It is therefore likely that some form of tariff adjustments will need to be introduced so as not to disadvantage patients and clinicians practising in areas of greater complexity.
{"title":"Does a cluster always equal a cluster? Geographical variation of cluster populations.","authors":"Josephine Morgan","doi":"10.1192/pb.bp.113.045237","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1192/pb.bp.113.045237","url":null,"abstract":"Aims and method To provide information regarding the extent to which the process of clustering using the mental health clustering tool captures the complexity of patient need across different geographical areas. Investigation was undertaken via a ‘deep dive’ into patient notes, with data collected on patients allocated to cluster 5, 8 or 13 in three different London boroughs. Results There is evidence for within-cluster differences between patients in different London boroughs in terms of various complexity factors. Further findings in relation to accuracy of clustering suggest some area-specific patterns in terms of clustering practice, raising the possibility that clinicians have different scoring thresholds in different areas. Clinical implications Complexity factors can affect resource use and therefore cost of service provision. In the case of a national tariff, providers of care to more complex patients may be placed at greater financial risk. It is therefore likely that some form of tariff adjustments will need to be introduced so as not to disadvantage patients and clinicians practising in areas of greater complexity.","PeriodicalId":90710,"journal":{"name":"Psychiatric bulletin (2014)","volume":"38 6","pages":"294-8"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2014-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1192/pb.bp.113.045237","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"32908260","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2014-12-01DOI: 10.1192/pb.bp.114.046870
Claudia Dunlop, Oluwatoyin Sorinmade
Aims and method An audit cycle assessed compliance of healthcare professionals within Oxleas NHS Foundation Trust with the statutory requirements of the Mental Capacity Act 2005 in patient care. Each stage involved a retrospective review of relevant patient electronic records. The additional purpose of the audit was to make recommendations to improve compliance with the requirement of the Act by healthcare professionals and improve patient understanding of its provisions. Results The audit cycle demonstrated some improvement in clinical practice as well as the need for further efforts at raising the understanding and compliance of clinicians and the public with provisions of the Act. Clinical Implications Healthcare professionals need further understanding of the provisions of the Act and their responsibilities. There is also the need to enhance public awareness to provisions of the Act in relation to their decision-making autonomy. Stakeholders need to put strategies in place for these to be achieved.
{"title":"Embedding the Mental Capacity Act 2005 in clinical practice: an audit review.","authors":"Claudia Dunlop, Oluwatoyin Sorinmade","doi":"10.1192/pb.bp.114.046870","DOIUrl":"10.1192/pb.bp.114.046870","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Aims and method An audit cycle assessed compliance of healthcare professionals within Oxleas NHS Foundation Trust with the statutory requirements of the Mental Capacity Act 2005 in patient care. Each stage involved a retrospective review of relevant patient electronic records. The additional purpose of the audit was to make recommendations to improve compliance with the requirement of the Act by healthcare professionals and improve patient understanding of its provisions. Results The audit cycle demonstrated some improvement in clinical practice as well as the need for further efforts at raising the understanding and compliance of clinicians and the public with provisions of the Act. Clinical Implications Healthcare professionals need further understanding of the provisions of the Act and their responsibilities. There is also the need to enhance public awareness to provisions of the Act in relation to their decision-making autonomy. Stakeholders need to put strategies in place for these to be achieved. </p>","PeriodicalId":90710,"journal":{"name":"Psychiatric bulletin (2014)","volume":"38 6","pages":"291-3"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2014-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4248166/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"32908259","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}