首页 > 最新文献

Breast最新文献

英文 中文
Advancing the legal rights of people with advanced breast cancer: a global expert review and call-to-action for 2025–2035 (Goal 10) 推进晚期乳腺癌患者的法律权利:全球专家审查和2025-2035年行动呼吁(目标10)
IF 7.9 2区 医学 Q1 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY Pub Date : 2025-12-01 DOI: 10.1016/j.breast.2025.104613
Sarah McHutchison , Tarishi Desai , Hayley Jones , Georgia Attfield , Alexandra Lewis , Fatima Cardoso
A diagnosis of advanced breast cancer (ABC) can be life-altering, presenting challenges that extend far beyond the clinical domain. Among these challenges is the ability to continue or return to work, a decision often influenced by financial necessity, social support, and the psychological desire for normalcy. Yet, systemic barriers such as treatment-related side effects, physical and cognitive impairments, and workplace stigma frequently hinders people with ABC from maintaining employment. The right to work is fundamental to dignity, independence, and quality of life, but for people with ABC this right is too often denied due to a lack of workplace support and insufficient legal protection.
This manuscript explores the current landscape and future opportunities to advance the legal rights of people with ABC. It summarizes research conducted for the ABC Global Alliance's Global Decade Report 2.0. The main findings are: a) ABC diagnosis severely limits work participation and employment retention; b) Legal protections for ABC patients and informal caregivers (often unpaid family members and friends) remain inconsistent globally; c) Flexible work policies can reduce economic loss and support workplace inclusion; d) ABC informal caregiver burden causes significant economic and social impact.
The findings from the ABC Global Alliance's Global Decade Report 2.0 have informed the development of a new ABC Global Charter. The ABC Global Charter 2.0 defines ten new achievable and measurable goals for the decade 2025–2035, aiming at improving the lives of people living with ABC worldwide.
晚期乳腺癌(ABC)的诊断可以改变生活,提出的挑战远远超出了临床领域。这些挑战包括继续或重返工作岗位的能力,这一决定往往受到经济需要、社会支持和对正常生活的心理渴望的影响。然而,系统性障碍,如治疗相关的副作用、身体和认知障碍以及工作场所的耻辱感,经常阻碍ABC患者继续就业。工作权利是尊严、独立和生活质量的基础,但对于患有ABC的人来说,由于缺乏工作场所支持和法律保护不足,这项权利往往被剥夺。本文探讨了目前的情况和未来的机会,以促进与ABC的人的合法权利。它总结了为ABC全球联盟全球十年报告2.0所做的研究。主要发现是:a) ABC诊断严重限制了工作参与和就业保留;b)对ABC患者和非正式护理人员(通常是无偿的家庭成员和朋友)的法律保护在全球范围内仍然不一致;c)灵活的工作政策可以减少经济损失,支持工作场所的包容性;d) ABC非正规照护者负担造成显著的经济和社会影响。ABC全球联盟全球十年报告2.0的调查结果为新的ABC全球宪章的制定提供了信息。《ABC全球宪章2.0》为2025-2035年制定了10个新的可实现和可衡量的目标,旨在改善全球ABC患者的生活。
{"title":"Advancing the legal rights of people with advanced breast cancer: a global expert review and call-to-action for 2025–2035 (Goal 10)","authors":"Sarah McHutchison ,&nbsp;Tarishi Desai ,&nbsp;Hayley Jones ,&nbsp;Georgia Attfield ,&nbsp;Alexandra Lewis ,&nbsp;Fatima Cardoso","doi":"10.1016/j.breast.2025.104613","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.breast.2025.104613","url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>A diagnosis of advanced breast cancer (ABC) can be life-altering, presenting challenges that extend far beyond the clinical domain. Among these challenges is the ability to continue or return to work, a decision often influenced by financial necessity, social support, and the psychological desire for normalcy. Yet, systemic barriers such as treatment-related side effects, physical and cognitive impairments, and workplace stigma frequently hinders people with ABC from maintaining employment. The right to work is fundamental to dignity, independence, and quality of life, but for people with ABC this right is too often denied due to a lack of workplace support and insufficient legal protection.</div><div>This manuscript explores the current landscape and future opportunities to advance the legal rights of people with ABC. It summarizes research conducted for the ABC Global Alliance's Global Decade Report 2.0. The main findings are: a) ABC diagnosis severely limits work participation and employment retention; b) Legal protections for ABC patients and informal caregivers (often unpaid family members and friends) remain inconsistent globally; c) Flexible work policies can reduce economic loss and support workplace inclusion; d) ABC informal caregiver burden causes significant economic and social impact.</div><div>The findings from the ABC Global Alliance's Global Decade Report 2.0 have informed the development of a new ABC Global Charter. The ABC Global Charter 2.0 defines ten new achievable and measurable goals for the decade 2025–2035, aiming at improving the lives of people living with ABC worldwide.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":9093,"journal":{"name":"Breast","volume":"84 ","pages":"Article 104613"},"PeriodicalIF":7.9,"publicationDate":"2025-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145619943","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Pathologic complete response in TNBC: A shield against recurrence, but not the brain? TNBC的病理完全缓解:防止复发,而不是大脑?
IF 7.9 2区 医学 Q1 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY Pub Date : 2025-12-01 DOI: 10.1016/j.breast.2025.104606
Kadri Altundag
{"title":"Pathologic complete response in TNBC: A shield against recurrence, but not the brain?","authors":"Kadri Altundag","doi":"10.1016/j.breast.2025.104606","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.breast.2025.104606","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":9093,"journal":{"name":"Breast","volume":"84 ","pages":"Article 104606"},"PeriodicalIF":7.9,"publicationDate":"2025-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145312443","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Meeting the informational needs of people with advanced breast cancer: a global expert review and call-to-action for 2025–2035 (Goal 6) 满足晚期乳腺癌患者的信息需求:全球专家审查和2025-2035年行动呼吁(目标6)
IF 7.9 2区 医学 Q1 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY Pub Date : 2025-12-01 DOI: 10.1016/j.breast.2025.104611
Anna Cabanes , Jenny Gilchrist , Marzia Zambon , Maya Gilbert , Alexandra Lewis , Georgia Attfield , Fatima Cardoso
For people living with advanced breast cancer (ABC), the complexities of making treatment decisions, adhering to medication regimens, and balancing the social and personal aspects of the disease can be overwhelming. People with ABC need comprehensive information and resources to understand their disease, prognosis, and treatment options. However, this information is often difficult to access, interpret or navigate, leaving many feeling confused, frustrated and helpless.
This manuscript evaluates the global ABC information landscape and its evolution since 2015, it analyzes the ongoing challenges faced by people with ABC, and outlines recommendations for the ABC community over the next decade. It summarizes research conducted for the ABC Global Alliance's Global Decade Report 2.0. The main findings are: a) The availability of ABC information has increased, but topics remain limited; b) ABC information from healthcare professionals is often limited to clinical topics; c) Patient advocacy groups are now crucial, trusted sources of ABC information; d) Online ABC information presents both opportunities and challenges; e) Global disparities in access to some topics of ABC information persist.
The findings from the ABC Global Alliance's Global Decade Report 2.0 have informed the development of a new ABC Global Charter. The ABC Global Charter 2.0 defines ten new achievable and measurable goals for the decade 2025–2035, aiming at improving the lives of people living with ABC worldwide.
对于患有晚期乳腺癌(ABC)的人来说,做出治疗决定、坚持药物治疗方案以及平衡疾病的社会和个人方面的复杂性可能是压倒性的。ABC患者需要全面的信息和资源来了解他们的疾病、预后和治疗方案。然而,这些信息往往难以获取、解释或导航,让许多人感到困惑、沮丧和无助。本文评估了自2015年以来全球ABC信息格局及其演变,分析了ABC人群面临的持续挑战,并概述了未来十年ABC社区的建议。它总结了为ABC全球联盟全球十年报告2.0所做的研究。主要发现是:a) ABC信息的可用性有所增加,但主题仍然有限;b)来自卫生保健专业人员的ABC信息通常仅限于临床主题;c)患者倡导团体现在是ABC信息的重要可靠来源;d)在线ABC信息既是机遇也是挑战;e)获取ABC信息某些主题的全球差异仍然存在。ABC全球联盟全球十年报告2.0的调查结果为新的ABC全球宪章的制定提供了信息。《ABC全球宪章2.0》为2025-2035年制定了10个新的可实现和可衡量的目标,旨在改善全球ABC患者的生活。
{"title":"Meeting the informational needs of people with advanced breast cancer: a global expert review and call-to-action for 2025–2035 (Goal 6)","authors":"Anna Cabanes ,&nbsp;Jenny Gilchrist ,&nbsp;Marzia Zambon ,&nbsp;Maya Gilbert ,&nbsp;Alexandra Lewis ,&nbsp;Georgia Attfield ,&nbsp;Fatima Cardoso","doi":"10.1016/j.breast.2025.104611","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.breast.2025.104611","url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>For people living with advanced breast cancer (ABC), the complexities of making treatment decisions, adhering to medication regimens, and balancing the social and personal aspects of the disease can be overwhelming. People with ABC need comprehensive information and resources to understand their disease, prognosis, and treatment options. However, this information is often difficult to access, interpret or navigate, leaving many feeling confused, frustrated and helpless<strong>.</strong></div><div>This manuscript evaluates the global ABC information landscape and its evolution since 2015, it analyzes the ongoing challenges faced by people with ABC, and outlines recommendations for the ABC community over the next decade. It summarizes research conducted for the ABC Global Alliance's Global Decade Report 2.0. The main findings are: a) The availability of ABC information has increased, but topics remain limited; b) ABC information from healthcare professionals is often limited to clinical topics; c) Patient advocacy groups are now crucial, trusted sources of ABC information; d) Online ABC information presents both opportunities and challenges; e) Global disparities in access to some topics of ABC information persist.</div><div>The findings from the ABC Global Alliance's Global Decade Report 2.0 have informed the development of a new ABC Global Charter. The ABC Global Charter 2.0 defines ten new achievable and measurable goals for the decade 2025–2035, aiming at improving the lives of people living with ABC worldwide.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":9093,"journal":{"name":"Breast","volume":"84 ","pages":"Article 104611"},"PeriodicalIF":7.9,"publicationDate":"2025-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145620740","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Ensuring access to multidisciplinary care in advanced breast cancer: a global expert review and call-to-action for 2025–2035 (Goal 4) 确保晚期乳腺癌获得多学科护理:全球专家审查和2025-2035年行动呼吁(目标4)
IF 7.9 2区 医学 Q1 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY Pub Date : 2025-12-01 DOI: 10.1016/j.breast.2025.104609
Shani Paluch-Shimon , Laura Biganzoli , Julie Torode , Ginny Mason , Sung-Bae Kim , Runcie C.W. Chidebe , Merel van Klinken , Georgia Attfield , Alexandra Lewis , Fatima Cardoso
Despite remarkable advances in the management of advanced breast cancer (ABC), profound disparities persist in outcomes and access to quality care globally. A multidisciplinary approach, where specialists collaborate on diagnosis, treatment planning, care continuity, and timely referrals, is widely recognized as the gold standard in ABC management and has been shown to lead to more accurate diagnoses, individualized treatment plans, and improved patient outcomes. Depending on the healthcare system, a multidisciplinary team (MDT) may include a medical oncologist, a radiation/clinical oncologist, radiologist, pathologist, surgeon, specialist nurse, allied healthcare professionals, and administrative staff. A multidisciplinary approach to ABC care is recommended by international guidelines and endorsed by leading bodies such as the European Society of Breast Cancer Specialists (EUSOMA).
This manuscript explores the current multidisciplinary care landscape in ABC, highlighting progress made, persistent challenges, and future directions. It summarizes research conducted for the ABC Global Alliance's Global Decade Report 2.0. The main findings are: a) New EUSOMA quality indicators set benchmarks for multidisciplinary ABC care; b) Most national guidelines now recommend multidisciplinary care for ABC; c) Surveys reveal uneven multidisciplinary team access, notably in low-income settings; d) Telemedicine and virtual MDTs expand access to ABC expertise; e) Palliative care remains poorly integrated in many MDTs globally.
The findings from the ABC Global Alliance's Global Decade Report 2.0 have informed the development of a new ABC Global Charter. The ABC Global Charter 2.0 defines ten new achievable and measurable goals for the decade 2025–2035, aiming at improving the lives of people living with ABC worldwide.
尽管在晚期乳腺癌(ABC)的管理方面取得了显著进展,但在全球范围内,在结局和获得高质量护理方面仍然存在巨大差异。多学科方法,即专家在诊断、治疗计划、护理连续性和及时转诊方面的合作,被广泛认为是ABC管理的黄金标准,并已被证明可以导致更准确的诊断、个性化的治疗计划和改善患者的预后。根据医疗保健系统的不同,多学科团队(MDT)可能包括内科肿瘤学家、放射/临床肿瘤学家、放射科医生、病理学家、外科医生、专科护士、联合医疗保健专业人员和行政人员。国际指南建议采用多学科方法进行ABC护理,并得到欧洲乳腺癌专家协会(EUSOMA)等主要机构的认可。这篇论文探讨了目前ABC的多学科护理景观,突出了取得的进展,持续的挑战和未来的方向。它总结了为ABC全球联盟全球十年报告2.0所做的研究。主要发现有:a)新的EUSOMA质量指标为多学科ABC护理设定了基准;b)大多数国家指南现在推荐ABC的多学科治疗;c)调查显示,多学科团队获得机会不均衡,特别是在低收入环境中;d)远程医疗和虚拟mdt扩大获得ABC专门知识的机会;e)姑息治疗在全球许多mdt中仍未得到很好的整合。ABC全球联盟全球十年报告2.0的调查结果为新的ABC全球宪章的制定提供了信息。《ABC全球宪章2.0》为2025-2035年制定了10个新的可实现和可衡量的目标,旨在改善全球ABC患者的生活。
{"title":"Ensuring access to multidisciplinary care in advanced breast cancer: a global expert review and call-to-action for 2025–2035 (Goal 4)","authors":"Shani Paluch-Shimon ,&nbsp;Laura Biganzoli ,&nbsp;Julie Torode ,&nbsp;Ginny Mason ,&nbsp;Sung-Bae Kim ,&nbsp;Runcie C.W. Chidebe ,&nbsp;Merel van Klinken ,&nbsp;Georgia Attfield ,&nbsp;Alexandra Lewis ,&nbsp;Fatima Cardoso","doi":"10.1016/j.breast.2025.104609","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.breast.2025.104609","url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Despite remarkable advances in the management of advanced breast cancer (ABC), profound disparities persist in outcomes and access to quality care globally. A multidisciplinary approach, where specialists collaborate on diagnosis, treatment planning, care continuity, and timely referrals, is widely recognized as the gold standard in ABC management and has been shown to lead to more accurate diagnoses, individualized treatment plans, and improved patient outcomes. Depending on the healthcare system, a multidisciplinary team (MDT) may include a medical oncologist, a radiation/clinical oncologist, radiologist, pathologist, surgeon, specialist nurse, allied healthcare professionals, and administrative staff. A multidisciplinary approach to ABC care is recommended by international guidelines and endorsed by leading bodies such as the European Society of Breast Cancer Specialists (EUSOMA).</div><div>This manuscript explores the current multidisciplinary care landscape in ABC, highlighting progress made, persistent challenges, and future directions. It summarizes research conducted for the ABC Global Alliance's Global Decade Report 2.0. The main findings are: a) New EUSOMA quality indicators set benchmarks for multidisciplinary ABC care; b) Most national guidelines now recommend multidisciplinary care for ABC; c) Surveys reveal uneven multidisciplinary team access, notably in low-income settings; d) Telemedicine and virtual MDTs expand access to ABC expertise; e) Palliative care remains poorly integrated in many MDTs globally.</div><div>The findings from the ABC Global Alliance's Global Decade Report 2.0 have informed the development of a new ABC Global Charter. The ABC Global Charter 2.0 defines ten new achievable and measurable goals for the decade 2025–2035, aiming at improving the lives of people living with ABC worldwide.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":9093,"journal":{"name":"Breast","volume":"84 ","pages":"Article 104609"},"PeriodicalIF":7.9,"publicationDate":"2025-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145620739","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Supplemental imaging modalities for breast cancer screening in women with dense breasts: A systematic review with economic considerations 乳腺致密女性乳腺癌筛查的辅助成像方式:一项考虑经济因素的系统综述。
IF 7.9 2区 医学 Q1 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY Pub Date : 2025-11-26 DOI: 10.1016/j.breast.2025.104668
Sinéad N. Duggan , Mohammad Azharuddin , Rodolfo Hernández , Clare Robertson , David Cooper , Emma McCall , Paul Manson , Gianni Virgili , Mike Clarke , Shaun Treweek , Miriam Brazzelli

Background

Underdiagnosis of breast cancer is a concern for women with dense breasts. This systematic review and meta-analysis evaluates the performance and cost-effectiveness of supplementary imaging modalities plus standard mammography, versus mammography alone, for detecting breast cancer in women with dense breasts.

Methods

We searched MEDLINE, Embase, Scopus, Cochrane Database, Web of Science, and CENTRAL for English-language studies published January 2014 to November 2024. Eligible studies compared the performance of a supplementary imaging modality with standard mammography in terms of cancer detection rate (CDR) in women with dense breasts undergoing screening. Risk of bias was assessed using QUADAS-2/QUADAS-C. Screening, data extraction, and quality assessment was conducted by one reviewer and checked by a second reviewer. PROSPERO: CRD42024550250.

Results

Out of 1740 search results, 36 studies met the inclusion criteria. Versus mammography alone, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) identified 18·92 (95 % CI 15·41-22·43) additional cancers per 1000 screenings while digital breast tomosynthesis (DBT), automated breast ultrasound (ABUS), and handheld ultrasound (HHUS) detected 1·69 (95 % CI 0·81-2·58), 2·3 (95 % CI 1·28-3·33), and 2·57 (95 % CI 0·99-4·14) additional cancers, respectively. One study of contrast-enhanced mammography (CEM) reported a CDR comparable to MRI. Economic modelling studies revealed heterogeneous results, with MRI showing potential under specific model assumptions.

Concluding statement

Standard mammography often fails to detect cancers in women with dense breasts. Supplementary MRI provides better detection than DBT, ABUS, and HHUS. CEM seems comparable to MRI, based on limited evidence. These findings should be considered in future screening policy reviews for women with dense breasts.
背景:乳腺癌的诊断不足是致密乳房妇女的一个问题。本系统综述和荟萃分析评估了辅助成像方式加标准乳房x光检查与单独乳房x光检查在致密乳房女性中检测乳腺癌的性能和成本效益。方法:检索MEDLINE、Embase、Scopus、Cochrane Database、Web of Science和CENTRAL,检索2014年1月至2024年11月发表的英文研究。符合条件的研究比较了辅助成像方式与标准乳房x线摄影在接受筛查的致密乳房妇女的癌症检出率(CDR)方面的表现。使用QUADAS-2/QUADAS-C评估偏倚风险。筛选、数据提取和质量评估由一名审稿人进行,并由另一名审稿人进行检查。普洛斯彼罗:CRD42024550250。结果:在1740个检索结果中,有36个研究符合纳入标准。与单独的乳房x光检查相比,磁共振成像(MRI)每1000次筛查发现18.92例(95% CI 15.41 - 22.43)额外的癌症,而数字乳房断层合成(DBT)、自动乳房超声(ABUS)和手持式超声(HHUS)分别发现1.69例(95% CI 0.81 - 1.58)、2.3例(95% CI 1.28 - 3.33)和2.57例(95% CI 0.99 - 4.14)额外的癌症。一项对比增强乳房x线摄影(CEM)的研究报告了与MRI相当的CDR。经济模型研究揭示了异质的结果,MRI显示了特定模型假设下的潜力。结束语:标准的乳房x光检查通常不能检测出致密乳房的癌症。辅助MRI比DBT, ABUS和hus提供更好的检测。基于有限的证据,CEM似乎与MRI相当。这些发现应该在未来对致密性乳房妇女的筛查政策审查中加以考虑。
{"title":"Supplemental imaging modalities for breast cancer screening in women with dense breasts: A systematic review with economic considerations","authors":"Sinéad N. Duggan ,&nbsp;Mohammad Azharuddin ,&nbsp;Rodolfo Hernández ,&nbsp;Clare Robertson ,&nbsp;David Cooper ,&nbsp;Emma McCall ,&nbsp;Paul Manson ,&nbsp;Gianni Virgili ,&nbsp;Mike Clarke ,&nbsp;Shaun Treweek ,&nbsp;Miriam Brazzelli","doi":"10.1016/j.breast.2025.104668","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.breast.2025.104668","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Underdiagnosis of breast cancer is a concern for women with dense breasts. This systematic review and meta-analysis evaluates the performance and cost-effectiveness of supplementary imaging modalities plus standard mammography, versus mammography alone, for detecting breast cancer in women with dense breasts.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>We searched MEDLINE, Embase, Scopus, Cochrane Database, Web of Science, and CENTRAL for English-language studies published January 2014 to November 2024. Eligible studies compared the performance of a supplementary imaging modality with standard mammography in terms of cancer detection rate (CDR) in women with dense breasts undergoing screening. Risk of bias was assessed using QUADAS-2/QUADAS-C. Screening, data extraction, and quality assessment was conducted by one reviewer and checked by a second reviewer. PROSPERO: CRD42024550250.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Out of 1740 search results, 36 studies met the inclusion criteria. Versus mammography alone, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) identified 18·92 (95 % CI 15·41-22·43) additional cancers per 1000 screenings while digital breast tomosynthesis (DBT), automated breast ultrasound (ABUS), and handheld ultrasound (HHUS) detected 1·69 (95 % CI 0·81-2·58), 2·3 (95 % CI 1·28-3·33), and 2·57 (95 % CI 0·99-4·14) additional cancers, respectively. One study of contrast-enhanced mammography (CEM) reported a CDR comparable to MRI. Economic modelling studies revealed heterogeneous results, with MRI showing potential under specific model assumptions.</div></div><div><h3>Concluding statement</h3><div>Standard mammography often fails to detect cancers in women with dense breasts. Supplementary MRI provides better detection than DBT, ABUS, and HHUS. CEM seems comparable to MRI, based on limited evidence. These findings should be considered in future screening policy reviews for women with dense breasts.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":9093,"journal":{"name":"Breast","volume":"85 ","pages":"Article 104668"},"PeriodicalIF":7.9,"publicationDate":"2025-11-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145676551","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Metastasis-directed thermal ablation in patients with metastatic breast cancer and visceral oligoprogression or oligopersistence: a cohort study 转移性乳腺癌和内脏少进展或少持续患者的转移性定向热消融:一项队列研究
IF 7.9 2区 医学 Q1 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY Pub Date : 2025-11-26 DOI: 10.1016/j.breast.2025.104667
Nadia Bianco , Carmine Valenza , Monica Milano , Roberta Multinu , Elena Battaiotto , Matteo Cavallone , Giulia Malvezzi , Dario Trapani , Paolo Della Vigna , Guido Bonomo , Gianluca M. Varano , Daniele Maiettini , Maria Giovanna Pitoni , Claudia Sangalli , Elisabetta Munzone , Giuseppe Curigliano , Marco A. Colleoni , Franco Orsi

Background

Patients with visceral oligoprogressive and oligopersistent metastatic breast cancer (mBC) may benefit from metastasis-directed thermal ablation (TA) to all sites of metastasis, while maintaining the same systemic treatment, in order to delay the time to treatment failure (TTF). This study aims to assess the outcomes provided by this multimodal strategy.

Methods

We conducted a single-center, cohort study including consecutive patients with visceral oligoprogressive and oligopersistent mBC as per ESTRO/EORTC criteria, who underwent TA to all sites. Oligoprogression was defined as progressive disease in ≤5 metastatic sites with at least one other metastatic site maintaining the disease control; oligopersistence as ≤5 persistent lesions after systemic therapy. The main endpoint was post-TA progression-free survival (pTA-PFS).

Results

43 patients with oligoprogressive (cohort A) and 43 with oligopersistent (cohort B) disease were included; 4 (5 %) reported a TA-related adverse event. Overall, 122 visceral lesions were treated. In cohort A, median PFS before oligoprogression was 14.9 months (95 % CI, 9.7–20.1). After TA, 32 patients continued the same systemic treatment and 11 switched therapy; pTA-PFS was 9.1 months (95 % CI, 4.8–13.4), unchanged after excluding patients who switched systemic therapy. In cohort B, median PFS before oligopersistence was 7.8 months (95 % CI, 7.4–8.3). After TA, 35 patients continued the same systemic treatment, while 8 de-intensified to maintenance therapy; pTA-PFS was 16.7 months (95 % CI, 11.1–22.2).

Conclusion

Selected patients with visceral oligoprogressive and oligopersistent mBC appear to benefit from TA and systemic treatment continuation or modulation. This strategy can be implemented for selected patients in the framework of a multidisciplinary tumor board's shared decision.
背景:内脏少进展性和少持续性转移性乳腺癌(mBC)患者可能受益于转移性定向热消融(TA)到所有转移部位,同时保持相同的全身治疗,以延迟治疗失败(TTF)的时间。本研究旨在评估这种多模式策略提供的结果。方法:我们进行了一项单中心队列研究,纳入了符合ESTRO/EORTC标准的内脏低进行性和低持续性mBC患者,这些患者接受了所有部位的TA。寡进展被定义为在≤5个转移部位出现进展性疾病,且至少有一个其他转移部位维持疾病控制;经全身治疗后持续病灶≤5个,为低持续性。主要终点为ta后无进展生存期(pTA-PFS)。结果纳入43例低进行性疾病(A组)和43例低持续性疾病(B组);4例(5%)报告了ta相关的不良事件。总共治疗了122个内脏病变。在队列A中,少进展前的中位PFS为14.9个月(95% CI, 9.7-20.1)。TA治疗后,32例患者继续接受相同的全身治疗,11例患者转换治疗;pTA-PFS为9.1个月(95% CI, 4.8-13.4),在排除转用全身治疗的患者后没有变化。在队列B中,低持续性前的中位PFS为7.8个月(95% CI, 7.4-8.3)。TA治疗后,35例患者继续接受相同的全身治疗,8例患者去强化至维持治疗;pTA-PFS为16.7个月(95% CI, 11.1-22.2)。结论选定的内脏低进行性和低持续性mBC患者似乎受益于TA和全身治疗的持续或调节。该策略可以在多学科肿瘤委员会共同决策的框架内对选定的患者实施。
{"title":"Metastasis-directed thermal ablation in patients with metastatic breast cancer and visceral oligoprogression or oligopersistence: a cohort study","authors":"Nadia Bianco ,&nbsp;Carmine Valenza ,&nbsp;Monica Milano ,&nbsp;Roberta Multinu ,&nbsp;Elena Battaiotto ,&nbsp;Matteo Cavallone ,&nbsp;Giulia Malvezzi ,&nbsp;Dario Trapani ,&nbsp;Paolo Della Vigna ,&nbsp;Guido Bonomo ,&nbsp;Gianluca M. Varano ,&nbsp;Daniele Maiettini ,&nbsp;Maria Giovanna Pitoni ,&nbsp;Claudia Sangalli ,&nbsp;Elisabetta Munzone ,&nbsp;Giuseppe Curigliano ,&nbsp;Marco A. Colleoni ,&nbsp;Franco Orsi","doi":"10.1016/j.breast.2025.104667","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.breast.2025.104667","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Patients with visceral oligoprogressive and oligopersistent metastatic breast cancer (mBC) may benefit from metastasis-directed thermal ablation (TA) to all sites of metastasis, while maintaining the same systemic treatment, in order to delay the time to treatment failure (TTF). This study aims to assess the outcomes provided by this multimodal strategy.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>We conducted a single-center, cohort study including consecutive patients with visceral oligoprogressive and oligopersistent mBC as per ESTRO/EORTC criteria, who underwent TA to all sites. Oligoprogression was defined as progressive disease in ≤5 metastatic sites with at least one other metastatic site maintaining the disease control; oligopersistence as ≤5 persistent lesions after systemic therapy. The main endpoint was post-TA progression-free survival (pTA-PFS).</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>43 patients with oligoprogressive (cohort A) and 43 with oligopersistent (cohort B) disease were included; 4 (5 %) reported a TA-related adverse event. Overall, 122 visceral lesions were treated. In cohort A, median PFS before oligoprogression was 14.9 months (95 % CI, 9.7–20.1). After TA, 32 patients continued the same systemic treatment and 11 switched therapy; pTA-PFS was 9.1 months (95 % CI, 4.8–13.4), unchanged after excluding patients who switched systemic therapy. In cohort B, median PFS before oligopersistence was 7.8 months (95 % CI, 7.4–8.3). After TA, 35 patients continued the same systemic treatment, while 8 de-intensified to maintenance therapy; pTA-PFS was 16.7 months (95 % CI, 11.1–22.2).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>Selected patients with visceral oligoprogressive and oligopersistent mBC appear to benefit from TA and systemic treatment continuation or modulation. This strategy can be implemented for selected patients in the framework of a multidisciplinary tumor board's shared decision.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":9093,"journal":{"name":"Breast","volume":"85 ","pages":"Article 104667"},"PeriodicalIF":7.9,"publicationDate":"2025-11-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145615911","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Less endocrine therapy in HR+/HER2- breast cancer: a nationwide trend despite unchanged guidelines HR+/HER2-乳腺癌较少的内分泌治疗:尽管指南未改变,但全国趋势
IF 7.9 2区 医学 Q1 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY Pub Date : 2025-11-26 DOI: 10.1016/j.breast.2025.104664
Eline E.F. Verreck , Emily L. Postma , Tanja Oostergo , Joyce Meijer , Anouk Eijkelboom , Sabine Siesling , Dimitris Rizopoulos , Thijs van Dalen , José H. Volders

Background

Adjuvant systemic therapy has improved breast cancer outcomes over the past decades. Following the distinction of molecular subtypes and the introduction of gene expression profiling and prognostic tools, chemotherapy is less frequently recommended for hormone receptor-positive, HER2-negative (HR+/HER2-) breast cancer. However, recommendations for endocrine therapy (ET) remained unchanged. This study examines ET trends among HR+/HER2- patients in the Netherlands and factors influencing these trends.

Methods

All HR+/HER2- patients diagnosed between 2012 and 2022 who underwent surgery were selected from the Netherlands Cancer Registry. Patients were categorized by ET guideline indications: no indication; indication based on pathological, postoperative TNM-stage/grade; or indication based on clinical TNM-stage/grading on biopsy warranting neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC). The ET benefit was estimated for all patients using the PREDICT 2.0 tool. Logistic regression was used to identify factors associated with ET initiation.

Results

The study included 127,610 HR+/HER2- patients. The proportion starting ET according to guideline recommendations decreased from 91.2 % (2012) to 79.3 % (2022), with those who did not initiate ET having a lower PREDICT-estimated benefit (1.0 %) compared to those who did (1.5 %). Reduced ET initiation was associated with age 30–39, age >80, and treatment in academic hospitals. In 2022, ET initiation varied by up to 19 percentage points across regions, while the PREDICT-estimated benefit showed no clinically relevant difference (ranging from 1.3 % to 1.5 %).

Conclusion

Despite unchanged guideline recommendations, fewer patients started ET over time. This trend, and regional variation, suggests that a more reticent approach by physicians to initiating ET for HR+/HER2- breast cancer may be contributing to it.
背景:在过去的几十年里,辅助全身治疗改善了乳腺癌的预后。随着分子亚型的区分以及基因表达谱和预后工具的引入,对于激素受体阳性、HER2阴性(HR+/HER2-)的乳腺癌,化疗的推荐频率降低了。然而,内分泌治疗(ET)的建议仍未改变。本研究探讨了荷兰HR+/HER2-患者的ET趋势和影响这些趋势的因素。方法:从荷兰癌症登记处选择2012年至2022年间诊断为HR+/HER2-的手术患者。患者按ET指南适应症分类:无适应症;根据病理、术后tnm分期/分级的适应症;或基于临床tnm分期/活检分级的适应症,是否需要新辅助化疗(NAC)。使用PREDICT 2.0工具估计所有患者的ET获益。使用逻辑回归来确定与ET起始相关的因素。结果:该研究包括127,610例HR+/HER2-患者。根据指南建议开始ET治疗的比例从91.2%(2012年)下降到79.3%(2022年),未开始ET治疗的患者的预测估计获益(1.0%)低于开始ET治疗的患者(1.5%)。ET起始时间的减少与30-39岁、80岁及在学术医院接受治疗有关。2022年,不同地区的ET起始率差异高达19个百分点,而predict估计的获益没有临床相关差异(从1.3%到1.5%不等)。结论:尽管指南建议不变,但随着时间的推移,开始ET治疗的患者越来越少。这一趋势和地区差异表明,医生对HR+/HER2-乳腺癌采用更谨慎的ET治疗可能是原因之一。
{"title":"Less endocrine therapy in HR+/HER2- breast cancer: a nationwide trend despite unchanged guidelines","authors":"Eline E.F. Verreck ,&nbsp;Emily L. Postma ,&nbsp;Tanja Oostergo ,&nbsp;Joyce Meijer ,&nbsp;Anouk Eijkelboom ,&nbsp;Sabine Siesling ,&nbsp;Dimitris Rizopoulos ,&nbsp;Thijs van Dalen ,&nbsp;José H. Volders","doi":"10.1016/j.breast.2025.104664","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.breast.2025.104664","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Adjuvant systemic therapy has improved breast cancer outcomes over the past decades. Following the distinction of molecular subtypes and the introduction of gene expression profiling and prognostic tools, chemotherapy is less frequently recommended for hormone receptor-positive, HER2-negative (HR+/HER2-) breast cancer. However, recommendations for endocrine therapy (ET) remained unchanged. This study examines ET trends among HR+/HER2- patients in the Netherlands and factors influencing these trends.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>All HR+/HER2- patients diagnosed between 2012 and 2022 who underwent surgery were selected from the Netherlands Cancer Registry. Patients were categorized by ET guideline indications: no indication; indication based on pathological, postoperative TNM-stage/grade; or indication based on clinical TNM-stage/grading on biopsy warranting neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC). The ET benefit was estimated for all patients using the PREDICT 2.0 tool. Logistic regression was used to identify factors associated with ET initiation.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>The study included 127,610 HR+/HER2- patients. The proportion starting ET according to guideline recommendations decreased from 91.2 % (2012) to 79.3 % (2022), with those who did not initiate ET having a lower PREDICT-estimated benefit (1.0 %) compared to those who did (1.5 %). Reduced ET initiation was associated with age 30–39, age &gt;80, and treatment in academic hospitals. In 2022, ET initiation varied by up to 19 percentage points across regions, while the PREDICT-estimated benefit showed no clinically relevant difference (ranging from 1.3 % to 1.5 %).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>Despite unchanged guideline recommendations, fewer patients started ET over time. This trend, and regional variation, suggests that a more reticent approach by physicians to initiating ET for HR+/HER2- breast cancer may be contributing to it.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":9093,"journal":{"name":"Breast","volume":"85 ","pages":"Article 104664"},"PeriodicalIF":7.9,"publicationDate":"2025-11-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145666945","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Real-world outcomes with palbociclib, ribociclib, and abemaciclib plus endocrine therapy in HR+/HER2− advanced breast cancer: A multicenter retrospective study palbociclib、ribociclib和abemaciclib联合内分泌治疗HR+/HER2−晚期乳腺癌的实际结果:一项多中心回顾性研究
IF 7.9 2区 医学 Q1 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY Pub Date : 2025-11-24 DOI: 10.1016/j.breast.2025.104665
Renata Duchnowska , Katarzyna Soter , Katarzyna Pogoda , Jolanta Smok-Kalwat , Aleksandra Grela-Wojewoda , Karolina Winsko-Szczęsnowicz , Agnieszka Kowalewska-Felczak , Marek Szwiec , Iwona Danielewicz , Joanna Streb , Tomasz Lewandowski , Bartosz Szymanowski , Joanna Kiszka , Barbara Radecka , Ewa Kalinka , Bartosz K. Sobocki , Maria Litwiniuk , Aleksandra Łacko , Anna Bałata , Justyna Żubrowska , Jacek Jassem

Background

Cyclin-dependent kinase 4/6 inhibitors (CDK4/6i) combined with endocrine therapy (ET) are the standard first- and second-line treatments for hormone receptor-positive (HR+), HER2-negative (HER2−) advanced breast cancer (ABC). Real-world data (RWD) may inform the optimal use of these agents in routine practice.

Patients and methods

The multicenter, population-based POLiCDK study compared progression-free survival (PFS), second PFS, and overall survival (OS) in ABC patients with HR+/HER2− ABC treated with palbociclib (PAL), ribociclib (RIB), or abemaciclib (ABE) in first- or second-line ET settings at 16 Polish centers between September 2017 and January 2025. Analyses were stratified by endocrine sensitivity/resistance, and stabilized inverse probability of treatment weighting was used to balance baseline characteristics.

Results

Among 2063 patients (701 PAL, 968 RIB, 394 ABE), 1583 (76.7 %) received CDK4/6i in the first-line and 480 (23.3 %) in the second-line setting. Overall, 927 (44.9 %) had de novo ABC; 819 (39.7 %) were endocrine-naïve, 158 (8.9 %) primary resistant, and 808 (39.2 %) secondary resistant. Median follow-up was 35.9, 24.1, and 21.4 months for PAL, RIB, and ABE, respectively. In endocrine-naïve patients, PFS did not differ significantly between CDK4/6i combined with aromatase inhibitors (AIs). In secondary endocrine-resistant disease, RIB and ABE outperformed PAL with AI combinations, whereas outcomes with fulvestrant were similar. In second-line therapy, all three CDK4/6i showed comparable results. Adjusted hazard ratios confirmed these trends without consistent superiority of any single agent.

Conclusions

Endocrine sensitivity/resistance and ET partner were major determinants of outcome with CDK4/6i plus ET in HR+/HER2− ABC, informing individualized treatment selection and sequencing.
细胞周期蛋白依赖性激酶4/6抑制剂(CDK4/6i)联合内分泌治疗(ET)是激素受体阳性(HR+)、HER2阴性(HER2−)晚期乳腺癌(ABC)的标准一线和二线治疗方法。现实世界的数据(RWD)可以告知这些药物在日常实践中的最佳使用。患者和方法多中心、基于人群的POLiCDK研究比较了2017年9月至2025年1月在16个波兰中心的一线或二线ET设置中接受帕博西尼(PAL)、核糖西尼(RIB)或阿贝美西尼(ABE)治疗的HR+/HER2 - ABC ABC患者的无进展生存期(PFS)、二次PFS和总生存期(OS)。根据内分泌敏感性/耐药性对分析进行分层,并使用稳定的治疗加权逆概率来平衡基线特征。结果在2063例患者中(701例PAL, 968例RIB, 394例ABE), 1583例(76.7%)在一线接受CDK4/6i治疗,480例(23.3%)在二线接受CDK4/6i治疗。总体而言,927例(44.9%)有新发ABC;819例(39.7%)为endocrine-naïve, 158例(8.9%)为原发性耐药,808例(39.2%)为继发性耐药。PAL、RIB和ABE的中位随访时间分别为35.9、24.1和21.4个月。在endocrine-naïve患者中,CDK4/6i联合芳香酶抑制剂(AIs)之间的PFS没有显着差异。在继发性内分泌抵抗疾病中,RIB和ABE联合AI优于PAL,而氟维司汀的结果相似。在二线治疗中,所有三种CDK4/6i都显示出类似的结果。调整后的风险比证实了这些趋势,但没有任何单一药物的一贯优势。结论CDK4/6i + ET在HR+/HER2−ABC中预后的主要决定因素是药物敏感性/耐药和ET伴侣,为个体化治疗选择和测序提供信息。
{"title":"Real-world outcomes with palbociclib, ribociclib, and abemaciclib plus endocrine therapy in HR+/HER2− advanced breast cancer: A multicenter retrospective study","authors":"Renata Duchnowska ,&nbsp;Katarzyna Soter ,&nbsp;Katarzyna Pogoda ,&nbsp;Jolanta Smok-Kalwat ,&nbsp;Aleksandra Grela-Wojewoda ,&nbsp;Karolina Winsko-Szczęsnowicz ,&nbsp;Agnieszka Kowalewska-Felczak ,&nbsp;Marek Szwiec ,&nbsp;Iwona Danielewicz ,&nbsp;Joanna Streb ,&nbsp;Tomasz Lewandowski ,&nbsp;Bartosz Szymanowski ,&nbsp;Joanna Kiszka ,&nbsp;Barbara Radecka ,&nbsp;Ewa Kalinka ,&nbsp;Bartosz K. Sobocki ,&nbsp;Maria Litwiniuk ,&nbsp;Aleksandra Łacko ,&nbsp;Anna Bałata ,&nbsp;Justyna Żubrowska ,&nbsp;Jacek Jassem","doi":"10.1016/j.breast.2025.104665","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.breast.2025.104665","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Cyclin-dependent kinase 4/6 inhibitors (CDK4/6i) combined with endocrine therapy (ET) are the standard first- and second-line treatments for hormone receptor-positive (HR+), HER2-negative (HER2−) advanced breast cancer (ABC). Real-world data (RWD) may inform the optimal use of these agents in routine practice.</div></div><div><h3>Patients and methods</h3><div>The multicenter, population-based POLiCDK study compared progression-free survival (PFS), second PFS, and overall survival (OS) in ABC patients with HR+/HER2− ABC treated with palbociclib (PAL), ribociclib (RIB), or abemaciclib (ABE) in first- or second-line ET settings at 16 Polish centers between September 2017 and January 2025. Analyses were stratified by endocrine sensitivity/resistance, and stabilized inverse probability of treatment weighting was used to balance baseline characteristics.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Among 2063 patients (701 PAL, 968 RIB, 394 ABE), 1583 (76.7 %) received CDK4/6i in the first-line and 480 (23.3 %) in the second-line setting. Overall, 927 (44.9 %) had <em>de novo</em> ABC; 819 (39.7 %) were endocrine-naïve, 158 (8.9 %) primary resistant, and 808 (39.2 %) secondary resistant. Median follow-up was 35.9, 24.1, and 21.4 months for PAL, RIB, and ABE, respectively. In endocrine-naïve patients, PFS did not differ significantly between CDK4/6i combined with aromatase inhibitors (AIs). In secondary endocrine-resistant disease, RIB and ABE outperformed PAL with AI combinations, whereas outcomes with fulvestrant were similar. In second-line therapy, all three CDK4/6i showed comparable results. Adjusted hazard ratios confirmed these trends without consistent superiority of any single agent.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Endocrine sensitivity/resistance and ET partner were major determinants of outcome with CDK4/6i plus ET in HR+/HER2− ABC, informing individualized treatment selection and sequencing.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":9093,"journal":{"name":"Breast","volume":"85 ","pages":"Article 104665"},"PeriodicalIF":7.9,"publicationDate":"2025-11-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145615859","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Outcomes for ER-positive CHEK2 c.1100delC breast cancer patients compared with breast cancer patients without the variant er阳性CHEK2 c.1100delC乳腺癌患者与无该变异的乳腺癌患者的结果比较
IF 7.9 2区 医学 Q1 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY Pub Date : 2025-11-24 DOI: 10.1016/j.breast.2025.104666
Maartje A.C. Schreurs , Muriel A. Adank , Bernadette A.M. Heemskerk-Gerritsen , Antoinette Hollestelle , Nyrée Smallenbroek , Christi J. van Asperen , Margreet G.E.M. Ausems , Irma van de Beek , Geertruida H. de Bock , Ingrid Boere , Liselotte P. van Hest , Kim J.A.F. van Kaam , Linda de Munck , Janet R. Vos , Agnes Jager , Marjanka K. Schmidt , Maartje J. Hooning , Hebon

Purpose

Germline CHEK2 c.1100delC-associated breast cancer (BC) patients have been reported with worse prognosis than patients without the variant. However, results are based on older cohorts and treatment regimens. As part of the Hebon-CHEK2 study, we aim to study prognosis in a Dutch cohort of genetically tested ER-positive BC patients diagnosed from 2006 onwards.

Methods

All patients underwent genetic testing based on personal and family history risk, and data on BC outcomes were collected. Hazard ratios (HRs) and 95 % confidence intervals (CI) for the association of CHEK2-status with prognosis were estimated via delayed entry Cox regression models, adjusted for age and year of diagnosis, tumor size, nodal status, and primary treatment regimens. Furthermore, we meta-analyzed our results with previous studies.

Results

We included 480 CHEK2 BC patients and 944 BC patients without the variant. Median follow-up was 6.0 years. Heterozygotes were more often diagnosed with small tumors, and lymph node positive disease. No significant difference was found for recurrent disease and distant disease-free survival, neither before 5 years (HR = 0.73; 95 %CI = 0.35–1.53 and HR = 0.99; 95 %CI = 0.44–2.21, respectively), nor after 5 years follow-up (HR = 0.29; 95 %CI = 0.06–1.28 and HR = 0.39; 95 %CI = 0.10–1.39, respectively). Also no significant difference in BC-specific survival (HR = 0.77; 95 %CI = 0.42–1.39) or overall survival (HR = 0.69; 95 %CI = 0.43–1.08) was found. Meta-analysis of our results with previous studies showed a worse BC-specific survival for heterozygotes.

Conclusion

In our study, with more recent years of diagnosis and treatment, we found no difference in prognosis, as opposed to previous studies. Further research is needed to validate our findings.
目的:据报道,种系CHEK2 c. 1100delc相关乳腺癌(BC)患者的预后比没有该变异的患者差。然而,结果是基于年龄较大的队列和治疗方案。作为Hebon-CHEK2研究的一部分,我们的目标是研究2006年以后诊断的基因检测er阳性BC患者的预后。方法对所有患者进行基于个人和家族史风险的基因检测,收集BC预后数据。通过延迟进入Cox回归模型估计chek2状态与预后相关的风险比(hr)和95%置信区间(CI),并根据年龄和诊断年份、肿瘤大小、淋巴结状态和主要治疗方案进行调整。此外,我们将我们的结果与之前的研究进行了meta分析。结果我们纳入了480例CHEK2 BC患者和944例无该变异的BC患者。中位随访时间为6.0年。杂合子更常被诊断为小肿瘤和淋巴结阳性疾病。5年前(HR = 0.73, 95% CI = 0.35-1.53, HR = 0.99, 95% CI = 0.44-2.21)和5年后(HR = 0.29, 95% CI = 0.06-1.28, HR = 0.39, 95% CI = 0.10-1.39),复发性疾病和远处无病生存率均无显著差异。bc特异性生存率(HR = 0.77; 95% CI = 0.42-1.39)或总生存率(HR = 0.69; 95% CI = 0.43-1.08)也无显著差异。我们的结果与先前研究的荟萃分析显示,杂合子的bc特异性生存率较差。结论在我们的研究中,随着近年来的诊断和治疗,我们发现预后没有差异,这与以往的研究相反。需要进一步的研究来验证我们的发现。
{"title":"Outcomes for ER-positive CHEK2 c.1100delC breast cancer patients compared with breast cancer patients without the variant","authors":"Maartje A.C. Schreurs ,&nbsp;Muriel A. Adank ,&nbsp;Bernadette A.M. Heemskerk-Gerritsen ,&nbsp;Antoinette Hollestelle ,&nbsp;Nyrée Smallenbroek ,&nbsp;Christi J. van Asperen ,&nbsp;Margreet G.E.M. Ausems ,&nbsp;Irma van de Beek ,&nbsp;Geertruida H. de Bock ,&nbsp;Ingrid Boere ,&nbsp;Liselotte P. van Hest ,&nbsp;Kim J.A.F. van Kaam ,&nbsp;Linda de Munck ,&nbsp;Janet R. Vos ,&nbsp;Agnes Jager ,&nbsp;Marjanka K. Schmidt ,&nbsp;Maartje J. Hooning ,&nbsp;Hebon","doi":"10.1016/j.breast.2025.104666","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.breast.2025.104666","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Purpose</h3><div>Germline <em>CHEK2</em> c.1100delC-associated breast cancer (BC) patients have been reported with worse prognosis than patients without the variant. However, results are based on older cohorts and treatment regimens. As part of the Hebon-CHEK2 study, we aim to study prognosis in a Dutch cohort of genetically tested ER-positive BC patients diagnosed from 2006 onwards.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>All patients underwent genetic testing based on personal and family history risk, and data on BC outcomes were collected. Hazard ratios (HRs) and 95 % confidence intervals (CI) for the association of <em>CHEK2</em>-status with prognosis were estimated via delayed entry Cox regression models, adjusted for age and year of diagnosis, tumor size, nodal status, and primary treatment regimens. Furthermore, we meta-analyzed our results with previous studies.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>We included 480 <em>CHEK2</em> BC patients and 944 BC patients without the variant. Median follow-up was 6.0 years. Heterozygotes were more often diagnosed with small tumors, and lymph node positive disease. No significant difference was found for recurrent disease and distant disease-free survival, neither before 5 years (HR = 0.73; 95 %CI = 0.35–1.53 and HR = 0.99; 95 %CI = 0.44–2.21, respectively), nor after 5 years follow-up (HR = 0.29; 95 %CI = 0.06–1.28 and HR = 0.39; 95 %CI = 0.10–1.39, respectively). Also no significant difference in BC-specific survival (HR = 0.77; 95 %CI = 0.42–1.39) or overall survival (HR = 0.69; 95 %CI = 0.43–1.08) was found. Meta-analysis of our results with previous studies showed a worse BC-specific survival for heterozygotes.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>In our study, with more recent years of diagnosis and treatment, we found no difference in prognosis, as opposed to previous studies. Further research is needed to validate our findings.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":9093,"journal":{"name":"Breast","volume":"85 ","pages":"Article 104666"},"PeriodicalIF":7.9,"publicationDate":"2025-11-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145615857","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Response to the letter “Targeted digital intervention boosts endocrine therapy adherence in breast cancer patients with low health literacy” 对“针对性数字干预提高低健康素养乳腺癌患者内分泌治疗依从性”信函的回应
IF 7.9 2区 医学 Q1 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY Pub Date : 2025-11-23 DOI: 10.1016/j.breast.2025.104662
Ilana Graetz
{"title":"Response to the letter “Targeted digital intervention boosts endocrine therapy adherence in breast cancer patients with low health literacy”","authors":"Ilana Graetz","doi":"10.1016/j.breast.2025.104662","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.breast.2025.104662","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":9093,"journal":{"name":"Breast","volume":"85 ","pages":"Article 104662"},"PeriodicalIF":7.9,"publicationDate":"2025-11-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145615860","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
期刊
Breast
全部 Acc. Chem. Res. ACS Applied Bio Materials ACS Appl. Electron. Mater. ACS Appl. Energy Mater. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces ACS Appl. Nano Mater. ACS Appl. Polym. Mater. ACS BIOMATER-SCI ENG ACS Catal. ACS Cent. Sci. ACS Chem. Biol. ACS Chemical Health & Safety ACS Chem. Neurosci. ACS Comb. Sci. ACS Earth Space Chem. ACS Energy Lett. ACS Infect. Dis. ACS Macro Lett. ACS Mater. Lett. ACS Med. Chem. Lett. ACS Nano ACS Omega ACS Photonics ACS Sens. ACS Sustainable Chem. Eng. ACS Synth. Biol. Anal. Chem. BIOCHEMISTRY-US Bioconjugate Chem. BIOMACROMOLECULES Chem. Res. Toxicol. Chem. Rev. Chem. Mater. CRYST GROWTH DES ENERG FUEL Environ. Sci. Technol. Environ. Sci. Technol. Lett. Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. IND ENG CHEM RES Inorg. Chem. J. Agric. Food. Chem. J. Chem. Eng. Data J. Chem. Educ. J. Chem. Inf. Model. J. Chem. Theory Comput. J. Med. Chem. J. Nat. Prod. J PROTEOME RES J. Am. Chem. Soc. LANGMUIR MACROMOLECULES Mol. Pharmaceutics Nano Lett. Org. Lett. ORG PROCESS RES DEV ORGANOMETALLICS J. Org. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. A J. Phys. Chem. B J. Phys. Chem. C J. Phys. Chem. Lett. Analyst Anal. Methods Biomater. Sci. Catal. Sci. Technol. Chem. Commun. Chem. Soc. Rev. CHEM EDUC RES PRACT CRYSTENGCOMM Dalton Trans. Energy Environ. Sci. ENVIRON SCI-NANO ENVIRON SCI-PROC IMP ENVIRON SCI-WAT RES Faraday Discuss. Food Funct. Green Chem. Inorg. Chem. Front. Integr. Biol. J. Anal. At. Spectrom. J. Mater. Chem. A J. Mater. Chem. B J. Mater. Chem. C Lab Chip Mater. Chem. Front. Mater. Horiz. MEDCHEMCOMM Metallomics Mol. Biosyst. Mol. Syst. Des. Eng. Nanoscale Nanoscale Horiz. Nat. Prod. Rep. New J. Chem. Org. Biomol. Chem. Org. Chem. Front. PHOTOCH PHOTOBIO SCI PCCP Polym. Chem.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1