首页 > 最新文献

Breast最新文献

英文 中文
Secondary dry eye disease in breast cancer patients: a pilot study 乳腺癌患者继发性干眼病:一项初步研究
IF 7.9 2区 医学 Q1 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY Pub Date : 2026-02-01 Epub Date: 2025-12-08 DOI: 10.1016/j.breast.2025.104677
Antonella Grasso , Andrea Salerno , Alessandra Micera , Alessandro Ferraro , Emilio Fornaro , Graziana Esposito , Marco Coassin , Vittorio Altomare , Antonio Di Zazzo

Purpose

To investigate ocular surface alterations associated with oncological therapy in patients with hormone receptor-positive (HR+) breast cancer.

Methods

In this prospective pilot study, 30 HR + breast cancer patients and 10 age-matched healthy controls were evaluated at three time points: before surgery (T0), one week after surgery before starting therapy (T1), and after 12 months of antiestrogenic treatment (T2). Clinical assessments included Ocular Surface Disease Index (OSDI), Visual Function Questionnaire-25 (VFQ-25), Schirmer test type I, tear break-up time (TBUT), Meibomian gland dysfunction (MGD) score, and corneal and conjunctival staining. Gene expression of IL-6 and ICAM-1 was analyzed via impression cytology.

Results

No differences were observed between cancer patients and controls at baseline. After surgery (T1), patients reported increased OSDI scores (p < 0.05), reduced TBUT (p < 0.01), and worse MGD scores (p < 0.01). After 12 months of treatment (T2), MGD scores, Schirmer test values, and ocular staining worsened significantly (p < 0.01), along with a decline in VFQ-25 scores (p < 0.05). IL-6 and ICAM-1 expression were significantly upregulated at T2. Postmenopausal women experienced more severe ocular surface dysfunction than premenopausal patients.

Conclusions

Antiestrogen therapy in HR + breast cancer patients induces progressive ocular surface dysfunction, driven by chronic inflammation and epithelial damage. These findings highlight the importance of recognizing ocular symptoms in this population and support further studies evaluating the role of routine ophthalmologic monitoring in survivorship care.
目的探讨激素受体阳性(HR+)乳腺癌患者的眼表改变与肿瘤治疗的关系。方法在这项前瞻性先导研究中,30例HR +乳腺癌患者和10例年龄匹配的健康对照者在三个时间点进行评估:术前(T0)、术后开始治疗前一周(T1)和抗雌激素治疗后12个月(T2)。临床评估包括眼表疾病指数(OSDI)、视功能问卷-25 (VFQ-25)、Schirmer试验ⅰ型、泪液破裂时间(TBUT)、睑板腺功能障碍(MGD)评分、角膜及结膜染色。印迹细胞学分析IL-6和ICAM-1基因表达。结果肿瘤患者与对照组在基线时无差异。术后(T1)患者OSDI评分升高(p < 0.05), TBUT评分降低(p < 0.01), MGD评分变差(p < 0.01)。治疗12个月(T2)后,MGD评分、Schirmer试验值、眼部染色明显恶化(p < 0.01), VFQ-25评分下降(p < 0.05)。IL-6和ICAM-1的表达在T2时显著上调。绝经后的妇女比绝经前的患者有更严重的眼表功能障碍。结论雌激素治疗HR +乳腺癌患者可引起慢性炎症和上皮损伤驱动的进行性眼表功能障碍。这些发现强调了在这一人群中识别眼部症状的重要性,并支持进一步研究评估常规眼科监测在生存护理中的作用。
{"title":"Secondary dry eye disease in breast cancer patients: a pilot study","authors":"Antonella Grasso ,&nbsp;Andrea Salerno ,&nbsp;Alessandra Micera ,&nbsp;Alessandro Ferraro ,&nbsp;Emilio Fornaro ,&nbsp;Graziana Esposito ,&nbsp;Marco Coassin ,&nbsp;Vittorio Altomare ,&nbsp;Antonio Di Zazzo","doi":"10.1016/j.breast.2025.104677","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.breast.2025.104677","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Purpose</h3><div>To investigate ocular surface alterations associated with oncological therapy in patients with hormone receptor-positive (HR+) breast cancer.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>In this prospective pilot study, 30 HR + breast cancer patients and 10 age-matched healthy controls were evaluated at three time points: before surgery (T0), one week after surgery before starting therapy (T1), and after 12 months of antiestrogenic treatment (T2). Clinical assessments included Ocular Surface Disease Index (OSDI), Visual Function Questionnaire-25 (VFQ-25), Schirmer test type I, tear break-up time (TBUT), Meibomian gland dysfunction (MGD) score, and corneal and conjunctival staining. Gene expression of IL-6 and ICAM-1 was analyzed via impression cytology.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>No differences were observed between cancer patients and controls at baseline. After surgery (T1), patients reported increased OSDI scores (<em>p</em> &lt; 0.05), reduced TBUT (<em>p</em> &lt; 0.01), and worse MGD scores (p &lt; 0.01). After 12 months of treatment (T2), MGD scores, Schirmer test values, and ocular staining worsened significantly (<em>p</em> &lt; 0.01), along with a decline in VFQ-25 scores (<em>p</em> &lt; 0.05). IL-6 and ICAM-1 expression were significantly upregulated at T2. Postmenopausal women experienced more severe ocular surface dysfunction than premenopausal patients.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Antiestrogen therapy in HR + breast cancer patients induces progressive ocular surface dysfunction, driven by chronic inflammation and epithelial damage. These findings highlight the importance of recognizing ocular symptoms in this population and support further studies evaluating the role of routine ophthalmologic monitoring in survivorship care.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":9093,"journal":{"name":"Breast","volume":"85 ","pages":"Article 104677"},"PeriodicalIF":7.9,"publicationDate":"2026-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145733461","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Omission of sentinel lymph node biopsy in early stage luminal breast cancer: impact on adjuvant CDK4/6 inhibitor recommendation and oncological outcomes 早期腔内乳腺癌遗漏前哨淋巴结活检:对辅助CDK4/6抑制剂推荐和肿瘤预后的影响
IF 7.9 2区 医学 Q1 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY Pub Date : 2026-02-01 Epub Date: 2025-11-07 DOI: 10.1016/j.breast.2025.104641
Martin Heidinger , Tibor A. Zwimpfer , Florian S. Halbeisen , Nadia Maggi , Marie Louise Frevert , Rama Kiblawi , Julie M. Loesch , Fabienne D. Schwab , Christian Kurzeder , Giacomo Montagna , Walter P. Weber

Background

Sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) omission is safe in many patients with small, clinically and imaging node-negative (cN0/iN0), hormone receptor (HR)-positive, human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-negative breast cancer (BC). However, recruitment of the pivotal SOUND/INSEMA trials ended prior to approval of adjuvant cyclin-dependent kinase 4/6 inhibitors (CDK4/6i). Therefore, the impact of SLNB omission on eligibility for CDK4/6i and associated oncological outcomes is unknown.

Methods

Single-center, retrospective study including patients with ≤cT2, cN0/iN0, HR-positive/HER2-negative early BC who underwent breast-conserving surgery and SLNB between 01/2014-12/2024. CDK4/6i eligibility was based on monarchE inclusion criteria and FDA approval (abemaciclib) and NATALEE inclusion criteria (ribociclib). Predictors of CDK4/6i eligibility and node-positivity were identified using multivariable logistic regression analysis. Impact on invasive disease-free survival was estimated based on published number needed to treat values in stage II disease (abemaciclib 28; ribociclib 63).

Results

Among 309 patients, eligibility was 6.1 % (19/309), 3.2 % (10/309), and 7.8 % (24/309) for abemaciclib (monarchE), abemaciclib (FDA approval), and ribociclib based on node-criteria; consequently, the number of SLNB necessary to identify one eligible patient was 17 (95 %CI 11–27), 31 (95 %CI 17–64) and 13 (95 %CI 9–20). Lymphovascular invasion was identified as a predictor for CDK4/6i eligibility and node-positivity. Omitting SLNB could increase recurrences by 0.3 % (95 %CI 0.2–0.4), 0.2 % (95 %CI 0.1–0.3), and 0.2 % (95 %CI 0.1–0.2) due to missed treatment with abemaciclib (monarchE), abemaciclib (FDA approval), and ribociclib, respectively.

Conclusion

Omission of SLNB in patients with small HR-positive/HER2-negative tumors results in a missed indication for CDK4/6i in <8 % with minimal impact on recurrence.
背景:前哨淋巴结活检(SLNB)遗漏对于许多临床和影像学淋巴结阴性(cN0/iN0)、激素受体(HR)阳性、人表皮生长因子受体2 (HER2)阴性乳腺癌(BC)患者是安全的。然而,关键SOUND/INSEMA试验的招募在辅助细胞周期蛋白依赖性激酶4/6抑制剂(CDK4/6i)获批之前就结束了。因此,SLNB缺失对CDK4/6i治疗资格和相关肿瘤预后的影响尚不清楚。方法采用单中心回顾性研究,纳入2014年1月- 2024年12月期间接受保乳手术和SLNB的≤cT2、cN0/iN0、hr阳性/ her2阴性早期BC患者。CDK4/6i的资格基于monarchE纳入标准、FDA批准(abemaciclib)和NATALEE纳入标准(ribociclib)。使用多变量logistic回归分析确定CDK4/6i适格性和节点阳性的预测因子。对侵袭性无病生存的影响是基于II期疾病治疗价值所需的已发表数量(abemaciclib 28; ribociclib 63)。结果309例患者中,基于淋巴结标准的abemaciclib (monarchE)、abemaciclib (FDA批准)和ribociclib的适格率分别为6.1%(19/309)、3.2%(10/309)和7.8% (24/309);因此,确定一名合格患者所需的SLNB数量为17 (95% CI 11-27), 31 (95% CI 17 - 64)和13 (95% CI 9-20)。淋巴血管侵袭被确定为CDK4/6i适格性和淋巴结阳性的预测因子。由于错过了abemaciclib (monarchE)、abemaciclib (FDA批准)和ribociclib的治疗,忽略SLNB可能会增加0.3% (95% CI 0.2 - 0.4)、0.2% (95% CI 0.1-0.3)和0.2% (95% CI 0.1-0.2)的复发率。结论在小的hr阳性/ her2阴性肿瘤患者中进行SLNB治疗会导致遗漏CDK4/6i指征的比例为8%,对复发的影响很小。
{"title":"Omission of sentinel lymph node biopsy in early stage luminal breast cancer: impact on adjuvant CDK4/6 inhibitor recommendation and oncological outcomes","authors":"Martin Heidinger ,&nbsp;Tibor A. Zwimpfer ,&nbsp;Florian S. Halbeisen ,&nbsp;Nadia Maggi ,&nbsp;Marie Louise Frevert ,&nbsp;Rama Kiblawi ,&nbsp;Julie M. Loesch ,&nbsp;Fabienne D. Schwab ,&nbsp;Christian Kurzeder ,&nbsp;Giacomo Montagna ,&nbsp;Walter P. Weber","doi":"10.1016/j.breast.2025.104641","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.breast.2025.104641","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) omission is safe in many patients with small, clinically and imaging node-negative (cN0/iN0), hormone receptor (HR)-positive, human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-negative breast cancer (BC). However, recruitment of the pivotal SOUND/INSEMA trials ended prior to approval of adjuvant cyclin-dependent kinase 4/6 inhibitors (CDK4/6i). Therefore, the impact of SLNB omission on eligibility for CDK4/6i and associated oncological outcomes is unknown.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Single-center, retrospective study including patients with ≤cT2, cN0/iN0, HR-positive/HER2-negative early BC who underwent breast-conserving surgery and SLNB between 01/2014-12/2024. CDK4/6i eligibility was based on monarchE inclusion criteria and FDA approval (abemaciclib) and NATALEE inclusion criteria (ribociclib). Predictors of CDK4/6i eligibility and node-positivity were identified using multivariable logistic regression analysis. Impact on invasive disease-free survival was estimated based on published number needed to treat values in stage II disease (abemaciclib 28; ribociclib 63).</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Among 309 patients, eligibility was 6.1 % (19/309), 3.2 % (10/309), and 7.8 % (24/309) for abemaciclib (monarchE), abemaciclib (FDA approval), and ribociclib based on node-criteria; consequently, the number of SLNB necessary to identify one eligible patient was 17 (95 %CI 11–27), 31 (95 %CI 17–64) and 13 (95 %CI 9–20). Lymphovascular invasion was identified as a predictor for CDK4/6i eligibility and node-positivity. Omitting SLNB could increase recurrences by 0.3 % (95 %CI 0.2–0.4), 0.2 % (95 %CI 0.1–0.3), and 0.2 % (95 %CI 0.1–0.2) due to missed treatment with abemaciclib (monarchE), abemaciclib (FDA approval), and ribociclib, respectively.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>Omission of SLNB in patients with small HR-positive/HER2-negative tumors results in a missed indication for CDK4/6i in &lt;8 % with minimal impact on recurrence.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":9093,"journal":{"name":"Breast","volume":"85 ","pages":"Article 104641"},"PeriodicalIF":7.9,"publicationDate":"2026-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145733547","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Perceived financial toxicity after active treatment and its association with clinical outcomes among breast cancer survivors: A prospective cohort study 乳腺癌幸存者积极治疗后的经济毒性及其与临床结果的关系:一项前瞻性队列研究
IF 7.9 2区 医学 Q1 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY Pub Date : 2026-02-01 Epub Date: 2026-01-10 DOI: 10.1016/j.breast.2026.104697
Doyoun Woen , Danbee Kang , Juwon Park , Hyunsoo Kim , Su Min Lee , Seok Jin Nam , Seok Won Kim , Jeong Eon Lee , Jong Han Yu , Byung Joo Chae , Jai Min Ryu , Woong Ki Park , Juhee Cho , Se Kyung Lee

Background

Perceived financial toxicity (FT) is an increasingly recognized concern among cancer survivors. However, its association with long-term oncologic outcomes, particularly after completion of active treatment, remains underexplored.

Methods

We conducted a prospective cohort study of 4163 breast cancer survivors from a tertiary cancer center in South Korea. Eligible participants were within 18 months of diagnosis, had completed surgery and any adjuvant chemotherapy or radiotherapy, and had no evidence of recurrence at enrollment. Perceived FT was assessed using the Comprehensive Score for Financial Toxicity (COST) questionnaire. FT was defined by a COST score <26. Primary outcome was recurrence-free survival (RFS), and secondary outcomes included all-cause mortality and quality-of-life (QoL) domains. Multivariable Cox proportional hazard models adjusted for age, stage, treatment, and socioeconomic factors.

Results

Among the cohort, 2109 (50.7 %) patients reported perceived FT after active treatment. FT was independently associated with increased risk of recurrence or death (HR 1.42, 95 % CI 1.08–1.87), and higher all-cause mortality (HR 1.74, 95 % CI 1.02–2.97). FT was also associated with significantly worse emotional functioning, social functioning, and future outlook.

Conclusions

Perceived financial toxicity following active breast cancer treatment was associated with worse oncologic and quality-of-life outcomes, regardless of objective socioeconomic status. These findings underscore the need for routine assessment of perceived financial burden during survivorship care and targeted financial interventions, even in patients without traditionally defined financial vulnerability.
背景:感知经济毒性(FT)是癌症幸存者日益关注的问题。然而,其与长期肿瘤预后的关系,特别是在完成积极治疗后,仍未得到充分探讨。方法:我们对来自韩国三级癌症中心的4163名乳腺癌幸存者进行了一项前瞻性队列研究。符合条件的参与者在诊断18个月内,完成手术和任何辅助化疗或放疗,并且在入组时没有复发的证据。感知FT使用财务毒性综合评分(COST)问卷进行评估。结果:在队列中,2109例(50.7%)患者报告在积极治疗后出现FT。FT与复发或死亡风险增加(HR 1.42, 95% CI 1.08-1.87)和全因死亡率升高(HR 1.74, 95% CI 1.02-2.97)独立相关。FT还与情绪功能、社会功能和未来前景明显恶化有关。结论:无论客观社会经济地位如何,积极乳腺癌治疗后的经济毒性与更差的肿瘤和生活质量结果相关。这些发现强调了在生存护理期间对感知到的经济负担进行常规评估和有针对性的经济干预的必要性,即使在没有传统上定义的经济脆弱性的患者中也是如此。
{"title":"Perceived financial toxicity after active treatment and its association with clinical outcomes among breast cancer survivors: A prospective cohort study","authors":"Doyoun Woen ,&nbsp;Danbee Kang ,&nbsp;Juwon Park ,&nbsp;Hyunsoo Kim ,&nbsp;Su Min Lee ,&nbsp;Seok Jin Nam ,&nbsp;Seok Won Kim ,&nbsp;Jeong Eon Lee ,&nbsp;Jong Han Yu ,&nbsp;Byung Joo Chae ,&nbsp;Jai Min Ryu ,&nbsp;Woong Ki Park ,&nbsp;Juhee Cho ,&nbsp;Se Kyung Lee","doi":"10.1016/j.breast.2026.104697","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.breast.2026.104697","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Perceived financial toxicity (FT) is an increasingly recognized concern among cancer survivors. However, its association with long-term oncologic outcomes, particularly after completion of active treatment, remains underexplored.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>We conducted a prospective cohort study of 4163 breast cancer survivors from a tertiary cancer center in South Korea. Eligible participants were within 18 months of diagnosis, had completed surgery and any adjuvant chemotherapy or radiotherapy, and had no evidence of recurrence at enrollment. Perceived FT was assessed using the Comprehensive Score for Financial Toxicity (COST) questionnaire. FT was defined by a COST score &lt;26. Primary outcome was recurrence-free survival (RFS), and secondary outcomes included all-cause mortality and quality-of-life (QoL) domains. Multivariable Cox proportional hazard models adjusted for age, stage, treatment, and socioeconomic factors.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Among the cohort, 2109 (50.7 %) patients reported perceived FT after active treatment. FT was independently associated with increased risk of recurrence or death (HR 1.42, 95 % CI 1.08–1.87), and higher all-cause mortality (HR 1.74, 95 % CI 1.02–2.97). FT was also associated with significantly worse emotional functioning, social functioning, and future outlook.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Perceived financial toxicity following active breast cancer treatment was associated with worse oncologic and quality-of-life outcomes, regardless of objective socioeconomic status. These findings underscore the need for routine assessment of perceived financial burden during survivorship care and targeted financial interventions, even in patients without traditionally defined financial vulnerability.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":9093,"journal":{"name":"Breast","volume":"85 ","pages":"Article 104697"},"PeriodicalIF":7.9,"publicationDate":"2026-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146017352","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Comparative validation of PREDICT versions 3.1 and 2.2 for overall survival in the Dutch breast cancer population 预测3.1和2.2版本在荷兰乳腺癌人群中总生存期的比较验证
IF 7.9 2区 医学 Q1 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY Pub Date : 2026-02-01 Epub Date: 2025-12-16 DOI: 10.1016/j.breast.2025.104681
Lara W.A. Vreven , Elfi M. Verheul , Marissa C. van Maaren , Frank Doornkamp , Robert-Jan Schipper , Sabine Siesling , Paul D.P. Pharoah , Vivianne C.G. Tjan-Heijnen , Adri C. Voogd

Background

PREDICT Breast is a clinical decision-support tool estimating prognosis and the absolute benefit of adjuvant systemic therapies in early breast cancer. PREDICT v2.2 is recommended in Dutch guidelines. Both v2.2 and the recently updated v3.1 have not been validated in the Dutch population. This study compares the predictive performance of PREDICT v3.1 and v2.2 for 10-year OS in Dutch breast cancer patients.

Methods

Women diagnosed between 2005 and 2013 with primary invasive breast cancer were selected from the Netherlands Cancer Registry. Ten-year OS predictions from v2.2 and v3.1 were compared with observed OS for the overall cohort and 36 subgroups defined by oestrogen receptor (ER) status, HER2-status, age, and tumour stage. Discrimination (ability to distinguish patients with different outcomes) and calibration (agreement between predicted and observed outcomes) of both models were assessed.

Results

Among 101,282 patients, both versions showed moderate discrimination (AUC v2.2 = 0.768; v3.1 = 0.775) and calibration (v2.2 intercept: 0.07; slope: 1.09; v3.1 intercept: 0.12, slope: 1.00). V3.1 slightly overestimated (1.9%), whereas v2.2 slightly underestimated (1.6%) 10-year OS. Across subgroups, v3.1 generally outperformed v2.2 except in patients aged >75 years, where v2.2 provided more accurate estimates. In ER-/HER- patients aged 50–75 years, v3.1 overestimated (1.5–2.8%) and v2.2 underestimated (2.8–5.3%) 10-year OS.

Conclusion

Both PREDICT v2.2 and v3.1 accurately predict 10-year OS in Dutch breast cancer patients, with small differences between versions that vary by subgroup. No single model is optimal for all patients highlighting the need for subgroup-specific recalibration and careful interpretation when applying PREDICT.
predict Breast是一个临床决策支持工具,用于评估早期乳腺癌辅助全身治疗的预后和绝对获益。荷兰指南中推荐使用PREDICT v2.2。v2.2和最近更新的v3.1都没有在荷兰人口中得到验证。本研究比较了PREDICT v3.1和v2.2对荷兰乳腺癌患者10年OS的预测性能。方法从荷兰癌症登记处选择2005年至2013年诊断为原发性浸润性乳腺癌的妇女。将v2.2和v3.1的10年OS预测与整个队列和36个由雌激素受体(ER)状态、her2状态、年龄和肿瘤分期定义的亚组的观察OS进行比较。对两种模型的区分(区分不同结果患者的能力)和校准(预测和观察结果之间的一致性)进行评估。结果在101282例患者中,两种版本均具有中等的鉴别性(AUC v2.2 = 0.768; v3.1 = 0.775)和校准性(v2.2截距:0.07;斜率:1.09;v3.1截距:0.12,斜率:1.00)。V3.1略微高估了(1.9%),而v2.2略微低估了(1.6%)10年OS。在各个亚组中,v3.1的表现普遍优于v2.2,但在75岁的患者中,v2.2提供了更准确的估计。在50-75岁的ER-/HER-患者中,v3.1高估(1.5-2.8%),v2.2低估(2.8-5.3%)10年OS。结论PREDICT v2.2和v3.1均能准确预测荷兰乳腺癌患者的10年OS,不同亚组版本间差异较小。没有单一模型对所有患者都是最佳的,这突出了在应用PREDICT时需要针对亚组进行重新校准和仔细解释。
{"title":"Comparative validation of PREDICT versions 3.1 and 2.2 for overall survival in the Dutch breast cancer population","authors":"Lara W.A. Vreven ,&nbsp;Elfi M. Verheul ,&nbsp;Marissa C. van Maaren ,&nbsp;Frank Doornkamp ,&nbsp;Robert-Jan Schipper ,&nbsp;Sabine Siesling ,&nbsp;Paul D.P. Pharoah ,&nbsp;Vivianne C.G. Tjan-Heijnen ,&nbsp;Adri C. Voogd","doi":"10.1016/j.breast.2025.104681","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.breast.2025.104681","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>PREDICT Breast is a clinical decision-support tool estimating prognosis and the absolute benefit of adjuvant systemic therapies in early breast cancer. PREDICT v2.2 is recommended in Dutch guidelines. Both v2.2 and the recently updated v3.1 have not been validated in the Dutch population. This study compares the predictive performance of PREDICT v3.1 and v2.2 for 10-year OS in Dutch breast cancer patients.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Women diagnosed between 2005 and 2013 with primary invasive breast cancer were selected from the Netherlands Cancer Registry. Ten-year OS predictions from v2.2 and v3.1 were compared with observed OS for the overall cohort and 36 subgroups defined by oestrogen receptor (ER) status, HER2-status, age, and tumour stage. Discrimination (ability to distinguish patients with different outcomes) and calibration (agreement between predicted and observed outcomes) of both models were assessed.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Among 101,282 patients, both versions showed moderate discrimination (AUC v2.2 = 0.768; v3.1 = 0.775) and calibration (v2.2 intercept: 0.07; slope: 1.09; v3.1 intercept: 0.12, slope: 1.00). V3.1 slightly overestimated (1.9%), whereas v2.2 slightly underestimated (1.6%) 10-year OS. Across subgroups, v3.1 generally outperformed v2.2 except in patients aged &gt;75 years, where v2.2 provided more accurate estimates. In ER-/HER- patients aged 50–75 years, v3.1 overestimated (1.5–2.8%) and v2.2 underestimated (2.8–5.3%) 10-year OS.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>Both PREDICT v2.2 and v3.1 accurately predict 10-year OS in Dutch breast cancer patients, with small differences between versions that vary by subgroup. No single model is optimal for all patients highlighting the need for subgroup-specific recalibration and careful interpretation when applying PREDICT.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":9093,"journal":{"name":"Breast","volume":"85 ","pages":"Article 104681"},"PeriodicalIF":7.9,"publicationDate":"2026-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145786947","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Impact of the interruption of tamoxifen for pregnancy on the recurrence and survival outcomes among young women with breast cancer 妊娠期中断他莫昔芬治疗对年轻乳腺癌患者复发和生存结局的影响
IF 7.9 2区 医学 Q1 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY Pub Date : 2026-02-01 Epub Date: 2025-12-12 DOI: 10.1016/j.breast.2025.104675
Chihwan David Cha , Somin Jeon , Jihyun Keum , Shin Jeong Pak , Boyoung Park , Min Sung Chung

Background

Young survivors of breast cancer often consider pregnancy after completing or interrupting endocrine therapy. However, concerns remain regarding the safety of tamoxifen interruption for pregnancy and its impact on survival outcomes. We aimed to evaluate the impact of interrupting and resuming tamoxifen for pregnancy on recurrence and mortality in patients with breast cancer, using real-world data.

Methods

We conducted a retrospective cohort study using data from the Korean National Health Insurance Service National Health Information Database. Among 32,378 women aged 18–45 years diagnosed with invasive breast cancer and who underwent surgery between 2009 and 2014, patients were categorized into groups based on tamoxifen interruption and pregnancy: Group 1 (interruption and resumption, n = 126), Group 2 (interruption without resumption, n = 261), Group 3 (initiation of tamoxifen after childbirth, n = 41), and Control (no interruption nor pregnancy, n =428). The control group was age-matched to the interruption groups in a 1:1 ratio. Clinical outcomes, including recurrence and mortality, were compared among groups.

Results

Over a median follow-up of 8.5 years, Groups 1 and 2 showed significantly lower risks of recurrence than the control group did (hazard ratio [HR] 0.41, 95 % confidence interval [CI]: 0.22–0.76, P = 0.005; HR 0.30, 95 % CI: 0.18–0.50, P < 0.001). In multivariate analysis, Group 2 also showed better survival outcomes (HR 0.18, 95% CI: 0.08–0.41, P < 0.001). Pregnancy outcomes differed across groups: Groups 1 and 2 had higher rates of full-term pregnancies, whereas Group 3 had a significantly higher abortion rate (23.8 %, 23.4 % vs. 56.1 %, respectively).

Conclusion

These findings suggest that temporary tamoxifen interruption for pregnancy may be a viable option for young survivors of breast cancer. Further studies are warranted to clarify the long-term impact of tamoxifen interruption on prognosis.
背景:年轻的乳腺癌幸存者在完成或中断内分泌治疗后经常考虑怀孕。然而,人们仍然关注他莫昔芬中断妊娠的安全性及其对生存结果的影响。我们的目的是评估妊娠期中断和恢复他莫昔芬对乳腺癌患者复发和死亡率的影响,使用真实世界的数据。方法采用韩国国民健康保险局国民健康信息数据库的数据进行回顾性队列研究。在2009年至2014年间接受手术的32378名18-45岁的浸润性乳腺癌患者中,根据他莫昔芬中断和妊娠情况将患者分为:1组(中断并恢复,n = 126), 2组(中断但未恢复,n = 261), 3组(分娩后开始使用他莫昔芬,n = 41)和对照组(未中断也未妊娠,n =428)。对照组与中断组按1:1的比例进行年龄匹配。临床结果,包括复发率和死亡率,在组间进行比较。结果中位随访8.5年,1、2组患者的复发风险明显低于对照组(风险比[HR] 0.41, 95%可信区间[CI]: 0.22-0.76, P = 0.005;风险比[HR] 0.30, 95% CI: 0.18-0.50, P < 0.001)。在多变量分析中,第2组也显示出更好的生存结果(HR 0.18, 95% CI: 0.08-0.41, P < 0.001)。妊娠结局在各组之间存在差异:1组和2组足月妊娠率较高,而3组的流产率明显较高(分别为23.8%、23.4%和56.1%)。结论:对于年轻的乳腺癌幸存者来说,妊娠期暂时停用他莫昔芬可能是一个可行的选择。需要进一步的研究来阐明他莫昔芬中断对预后的长期影响。
{"title":"Impact of the interruption of tamoxifen for pregnancy on the recurrence and survival outcomes among young women with breast cancer","authors":"Chihwan David Cha ,&nbsp;Somin Jeon ,&nbsp;Jihyun Keum ,&nbsp;Shin Jeong Pak ,&nbsp;Boyoung Park ,&nbsp;Min Sung Chung","doi":"10.1016/j.breast.2025.104675","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.breast.2025.104675","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Young survivors of breast cancer often consider pregnancy after completing or interrupting endocrine therapy. However, concerns remain regarding the safety of tamoxifen interruption for pregnancy and its impact on survival outcomes. We aimed to evaluate the impact of interrupting and resuming tamoxifen for pregnancy on recurrence and mortality in patients with breast cancer, using real-world data.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>We conducted a retrospective cohort study using data from the Korean National Health Insurance Service National Health Information Database. Among 32,378 women aged 18–45 years diagnosed with invasive breast cancer and who underwent surgery between 2009 and 2014, patients were categorized into groups based on tamoxifen interruption and pregnancy: Group 1 (interruption and resumption, n = 126), Group 2 (interruption without resumption, n = 261), Group 3 (initiation of tamoxifen after childbirth, n = 41), and Control (no interruption nor pregnancy, n =428). The control group was age-matched to the interruption groups in a 1:1 ratio. Clinical outcomes, including recurrence and mortality, were compared among groups.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Over a median follow-up of 8.5 years, Groups 1 and 2 showed significantly lower risks of recurrence than the control group did (hazard ratio [HR] 0.41, 95 % confidence interval [CI]: 0.22–0.76, <em>P</em> = 0.005; HR 0.30, 95 % CI: 0.18–0.50, <em>P</em> &lt; 0.001). In multivariate analysis, Group 2 also showed better survival outcomes (HR 0.18, 95% CI: 0.08–0.41, <em>P</em> &lt; 0.001). Pregnancy outcomes differed across groups: Groups 1 and 2 had higher rates of full-term pregnancies, whereas Group 3 had a significantly higher abortion rate (23.8 %, 23.4 % vs. 56.1 %, respectively).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>These findings suggest that temporary tamoxifen interruption for pregnancy may be a viable option for young survivors of breast cancer. Further studies are warranted to clarify the long-term impact of tamoxifen interruption on prognosis.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":9093,"journal":{"name":"Breast","volume":"85 ","pages":"Article 104675"},"PeriodicalIF":7.9,"publicationDate":"2026-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145973297","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Response to the letter “Targeted digital intervention boosts endocrine therapy adherence in breast cancer patients with low health literacy” 对“针对性数字干预提高低健康素养乳腺癌患者内分泌治疗依从性”信函的回应
IF 7.9 2区 医学 Q1 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY Pub Date : 2026-02-01 Epub Date: 2025-11-23 DOI: 10.1016/j.breast.2025.104662
Ilana Graetz
{"title":"Response to the letter “Targeted digital intervention boosts endocrine therapy adherence in breast cancer patients with low health literacy”","authors":"Ilana Graetz","doi":"10.1016/j.breast.2025.104662","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.breast.2025.104662","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":9093,"journal":{"name":"Breast","volume":"85 ","pages":"Article 104662"},"PeriodicalIF":7.9,"publicationDate":"2026-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145615860","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Health-related quality of life and fear of recurrence after early breast cancer treatment: Results from a cross-sectional survey 早期乳腺癌治疗后与健康相关的生活质量和对复发的恐惧:来自横断面调查的结果
IF 7.9 2区 医学 Q1 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY Pub Date : 2026-02-01 Epub Date: 2025-11-13 DOI: 10.1016/j.breast.2025.104647
Paola Mosconi , Secondo Folli , Rosalba Miceli , Serena Scrudato , Massimiliano Gennaro , Gabriele Tinè , Maria Carmen De Santis , Cristina Ferraris , Gabriele Martelli , Immacolata Di Carlo , Ilaria Maugeri , Alessio Arata , Maria Grazia Carnevale , Chiara Listorti , Roberto Agresti , Claudia Borreani , Claudio Vernieri , Giancarlo Pruneri , Paolo Baili , Valentina Appierto , Giovanni Apolone

Background

The growing population of breast cancer survivors has raised attention to the long-term effects of treatment and follow-up. This study explored how survivors experience follow-up care and its impact on quality of life, focusing on fear of cancer recurrence (FCR), work and financial burden.

Methods

In this monocentric observational study, survivors completed a questionnaire including validated items from GIVIO, EORTC QLQ-C30, and FCR Inventory Short-Form. Fourteen domains were assessed. Scores were scaled 0–100, with higher values indicating better outcomes, except for FCR, where higher scores indicate greater concern. Data were stratified by age, time since diagnosis, education, income. Cluster analysis uncovered patterns of survivor experience across questionnaire domains.

Results

Of 1565 women scheduled for follow-up over six months, 681 (43.5 %) agreed to participate and, after excluding patients not fulfilling the protocol, and questionnaires with >50 % missing data, 656 entered the final analysis. Mean quality of life (73.3), physical (75.6), and social functioning (82.7) scored high, while emotional (55.6) and cognitive functioning (61.6) were lower. Satisfaction with care was mixed, with lower ratings for the national health system-level (56.8). FCR was moderate overall (38), with recurrent/intrusive thoughts in 2.9 % and 5.6 % of respondents. Lower income was significantly associated with worse outcomes across several domains, while no relevant differences were observed by age, education, or time since diagnosis. Cluster analysis revealed two distinct response profiles, clearly distinguished only by socioeconomic status.

Conclusions

Breast cancer survivors reported overall good levels of functioning, with lower scores in emotional and cognitive domains. Socioeconomic status was the only factor clearly associated with distinct response patterns.
背景:乳腺癌幸存者人数的增加引起了人们对治疗和随访的长期影响的关注。本研究探讨了幸存者如何经历随访护理及其对生活质量的影响,重点关注对癌症复发的恐惧(FCR),工作和经济负担。方法在这项单中心观察性研究中,幸存者完成了一份问卷,包括GIVIO、EORTC QLQ-C30和FCR量表短表中的验证项目。共评估了14个领域。分数从0到100分,分数越高表明结果越好,除了FCR,分数越高表明越受关注。数据按年龄、诊断后时间、教育程度、收入进行分层。聚类分析揭示了跨问卷域的幸存者经历模式。结果在1565名随访超过6个月的女性中,681名(43.5%)同意参与,在排除不符合方案的患者和50%缺失数据的问卷后,656名进入最终分析。平均生活质量(73.3分)、身体(75.6分)和社会功能(82.7分)得分较高,而情感(55.6分)和认知功能(61.6分)得分较低。对医疗服务的满意度参差不齐,对国家卫生系统水平的满意度较低(56.8分)。FCR总体上是中等的(38),2.9%和5.6%的受访者有反复/侵入性的想法。在几个领域中,收入较低与较差的结果显著相关,而年龄、教育程度或诊断后的时间没有观察到相关差异。聚类分析揭示了两种不同的反应概况,仅由社会经济地位明显区分。结论:乳腺癌幸存者总体表现良好,情感和认知领域得分较低。社会经济地位是唯一与不同的反应模式明显相关的因素。
{"title":"Health-related quality of life and fear of recurrence after early breast cancer treatment: Results from a cross-sectional survey","authors":"Paola Mosconi ,&nbsp;Secondo Folli ,&nbsp;Rosalba Miceli ,&nbsp;Serena Scrudato ,&nbsp;Massimiliano Gennaro ,&nbsp;Gabriele Tinè ,&nbsp;Maria Carmen De Santis ,&nbsp;Cristina Ferraris ,&nbsp;Gabriele Martelli ,&nbsp;Immacolata Di Carlo ,&nbsp;Ilaria Maugeri ,&nbsp;Alessio Arata ,&nbsp;Maria Grazia Carnevale ,&nbsp;Chiara Listorti ,&nbsp;Roberto Agresti ,&nbsp;Claudia Borreani ,&nbsp;Claudio Vernieri ,&nbsp;Giancarlo Pruneri ,&nbsp;Paolo Baili ,&nbsp;Valentina Appierto ,&nbsp;Giovanni Apolone","doi":"10.1016/j.breast.2025.104647","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.breast.2025.104647","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>The growing population of breast cancer survivors has raised attention to the long-term effects of treatment and follow-up. This study explored how survivors experience follow-up care and its impact on quality of life, focusing on fear of cancer recurrence (FCR), work and financial burden.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>In this monocentric observational study, survivors completed a questionnaire including validated items from GIVIO, EORTC QLQ-C30, and FCR Inventory Short-Form. Fourteen domains were assessed. Scores were scaled 0–100, with higher values indicating better outcomes, except for FCR, where higher scores indicate greater concern. Data were stratified by age, time since diagnosis, education, income. Cluster analysis uncovered patterns of survivor experience across questionnaire domains.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Of 1565 women scheduled for follow-up over six months, 681 (43.5 %) agreed to participate and, after excluding patients not fulfilling the protocol, and questionnaires with &gt;50 % missing data, 656 entered the final analysis. Mean quality of life (73.3), physical (75.6), and social functioning (82.7) scored high, while emotional (55.6) and cognitive functioning (61.6) were lower. Satisfaction with care was mixed, with lower ratings for the national health system-level (56.8). FCR was moderate overall (38), with recurrent/intrusive thoughts in 2.9 % and 5.6 % of respondents. Lower income was significantly associated with worse outcomes across several domains, while no relevant differences were observed by age, education, or time since diagnosis. Cluster analysis revealed two distinct response profiles, clearly distinguished only by socioeconomic status.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Breast cancer survivors reported overall good levels of functioning, with lower scores in emotional and cognitive domains. Socioeconomic status was the only factor clearly associated with distinct response patterns.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":9093,"journal":{"name":"Breast","volume":"85 ","pages":"Article 104647"},"PeriodicalIF":7.9,"publicationDate":"2026-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145569974","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Baseline systemic inflammatory indices predict late radiation-induced fibrosis and toxicity in patients with early breast cancer 基线全身性炎症指数预测早期乳腺癌患者晚期放射诱导的纤维化和毒性。
IF 7.9 2区 医学 Q1 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY Pub Date : 2026-02-01 Epub Date: 2025-12-26 DOI: 10.1016/j.breast.2025.104685
Lorenzo Vinante , Jerry Polesel , Andrea Sacilotto , Anna Giroldi , Angela Caroli , Alberto Revelant , Cristina Cappelletto , Paola Chiovati , Alessia Chiofalo , Samuele Massarut , Barbara Belletti , Maurizio Mascarin , Agostino Steffan , Lorena Baboci
Radiation therapy (RT) is a standard component of treatment for early breast cancer and ductal carcinoma in situ. Although survival is excellent, RT-related side effects can impair long-term quality of life. We aimed to develop models to predict the risk of Grade ≥2 fibrosis and other late toxicities by combining clinical risk factors with baseline systemic inflammatory indices.
In this prospective study, 324 women underwent breast-conserving surgery followed by whole-breast RT and were followed for 24 months. Pre-surgical blood counts were used to calculate inflammatory indices, including NLR, dNLR, PLR, MLR, NLPR, SII, SIRI and AISI. Optimal cut-offs for each index was determined using ROC curves. Predictive models integrated clinical factors (surgical complications, post-menopausal status, chemotherapy, smoking, RT dose) with individual inflammatory indices to predict Grade ≥2 fibrosis and overall late side effects (fibrosis, skin side effects, chronic pain, lymphoedema).
At 24 months, 13.0 % of patients had developed Grade ≥2 fibrosis and 17.9 % had at least one Grade ≥2 late side effect. Patients who developed fibrosis had higher baseline NLR, dNLR, MLR, NLPR and SIRI. Models incorporating MLR or NLPR achieved area under the curve values > 0.70 and negative predictive values ≥ 93 %, outperforming models based on clinical risk factors alone. These findings suggest that routinely measured systemic inflammatory indices can identify patients at low risk of late RT side effects. If validated in external cohorts, these models may help tailor RT regimens to minimize long-term complications while maintaining therapeutic benefit.
放射治疗(RT)是早期乳腺癌和导管原位癌治疗的标准组成部分。虽然生存率很好,但rt相关的副作用会损害长期生活质量。我们的目标是建立模型,通过结合临床危险因素和基线全身性炎症指数来预测≥2级纤维化和其他晚期毒性的风险。在这项前瞻性研究中,324名妇女接受了保乳手术,随后进行了全乳RT,随访24个月。术前血球计数计算炎症指标,包括NLR、dNLR、PLR、MLR、NLPR、SII、SIRI、AISI。采用ROC曲线确定各指标的最佳截止点。预测模型将临床因素(手术并发症、绝经后状态、化疗、吸烟、RT剂量)与个体炎症指数结合,预测≥2级纤维化和总体晚期副作用(纤维化、皮肤副作用、慢性疼痛、淋巴水肿)。在24个月时,13.0%的患者发生≥2级纤维化,17.9%的患者至少有一个≥2级的晚期副作用。发生纤维化的患者有更高的基线NLR、dNLR、MLR、NLPR和SIRI。纳入MLR或NLPR的模型的曲线下面积值为> 0.70,阴性预测值≥93%,优于仅基于临床危险因素的模型。这些发现表明,常规测量全身炎症指数可以识别晚期RT副作用风险低的患者。如果在外部队列中得到验证,这些模型可能有助于定制放疗方案,以最大限度地减少长期并发症,同时保持治疗效果。
{"title":"Baseline systemic inflammatory indices predict late radiation-induced fibrosis and toxicity in patients with early breast cancer","authors":"Lorenzo Vinante ,&nbsp;Jerry Polesel ,&nbsp;Andrea Sacilotto ,&nbsp;Anna Giroldi ,&nbsp;Angela Caroli ,&nbsp;Alberto Revelant ,&nbsp;Cristina Cappelletto ,&nbsp;Paola Chiovati ,&nbsp;Alessia Chiofalo ,&nbsp;Samuele Massarut ,&nbsp;Barbara Belletti ,&nbsp;Maurizio Mascarin ,&nbsp;Agostino Steffan ,&nbsp;Lorena Baboci","doi":"10.1016/j.breast.2025.104685","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.breast.2025.104685","url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Radiation therapy (RT) is a standard component of treatment for early breast cancer and ductal carcinoma in situ. Although survival is excellent, RT-related side effects can impair long-term quality of life. We aimed to develop models to predict the risk of Grade ≥2 fibrosis and other late toxicities by combining clinical risk factors with baseline systemic inflammatory indices.</div><div>In this prospective study, 324 women underwent breast-conserving surgery followed by whole-breast RT and were followed for 24 months. Pre-surgical blood counts were used to calculate inflammatory indices, including NLR, dNLR, PLR, MLR, NLPR, SII, SIRI and AISI. Optimal cut-offs for each index was determined using ROC curves. Predictive models integrated clinical factors (surgical complications, post-menopausal status, chemotherapy, smoking, RT dose) with individual inflammatory indices to predict Grade ≥2 fibrosis and overall late side effects (fibrosis, skin side effects, chronic pain, lymphoedema).</div><div>At 24 months, 13.0 % of patients had developed Grade ≥2 fibrosis and 17.9 % had at least one Grade ≥2 late side effect. Patients who developed fibrosis had higher baseline NLR, dNLR, MLR, NLPR and SIRI. Models incorporating MLR or NLPR achieved area under the curve values &gt; 0.70 and negative predictive values ≥ 93 %, outperforming models based on clinical risk factors alone. These findings suggest that routinely measured systemic inflammatory indices can identify patients at low risk of late RT side effects. If validated in external cohorts, these models may help tailor RT regimens to minimize long-term complications while maintaining therapeutic benefit.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":9093,"journal":{"name":"Breast","volume":"85 ","pages":"Article 104685"},"PeriodicalIF":7.9,"publicationDate":"2026-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145910443","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
The overlooked publication: Forrest (1880) as the earliest report of male mammary Paget's disease 被忽视的出版物:Forrest(1880)作为最早报道男性乳腺佩吉特病的人。
IF 7.9 2区 医学 Q1 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY Pub Date : 2026-02-01 Epub Date: 2025-12-29 DOI: 10.1016/j.breast.2025.104688
Wiebren A. Tjalma M.D., Ph.D., FEBS (Hon)
{"title":"The overlooked publication: Forrest (1880) as the earliest report of male mammary Paget's disease","authors":"Wiebren A. Tjalma M.D., Ph.D., FEBS (Hon)","doi":"10.1016/j.breast.2025.104688","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.breast.2025.104688","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":9093,"journal":{"name":"Breast","volume":"85 ","pages":"Article 104688"},"PeriodicalIF":7.9,"publicationDate":"2026-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145910460","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Breaking down the costs for breast cancer: Insights from Sweden's national quality register 分解乳腺癌的成本:来自瑞典国家质量登记的见解
IF 7.9 2区 医学 Q1 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY Pub Date : 2026-02-01 Epub Date: 2025-11-11 DOI: 10.1016/j.breast.2025.104646
Xiaoyang Du , Leo Gkekos , Balram Rai , Anna L.V. Johansson , Irma Fredriksson , Mattias Rantalainen , Emelie Heintz , Shuang Hao , Mark Clements

Background

With new emerging technologies for diagnostics and treatment for breast cancer, there is a demand for updated breast cancer costs based on current clinical practice. The objectives of this study were to estimate recent societal costs of breast cancer in Sweden and provide population-based patient-level cost estimates for health economic evaluations.

Methods

This prevalence-based cost-of-illness study was based on 2019 data linking multiple Swedish national registers. The analysis employed a societal perspective considering direct health care, informal care, and productivity losses. Total costs were estimated using a bottom-up micro-costing approach. Direct costs per patient-year were also estimated by subgroups, including age group, breast cancer subtype, breast cancer stage at diagnosis, and disease state defined by metastatic status.

Findings

82,960 breast cancer patients diagnosed since 2008 were alive by the end of 2019. The annual societal cost of breast cancer in Sweden was €632 million, where the direct health care, informal care, and productivity losses accounted for 37 %, 5 %, and 57 %, respectively. The cost per capita was €61. Costs of direct health care, including inpatient/outpatient care and prescribed drugs, varied by subgroups, where younger age, higher stage, and more adverse subtypes were associated with higher costs per patient-year. Patients with a diagnosis of de novo metastatic cancer incurred the highest mean cost per patient-year.

Conclusion

Breast cancer represents a large economic burden in Sweden. The mean cost estimates per patient-year are informative to future health economic evaluations for breast cancer screening and treatment.
随着乳腺癌诊断和治疗的新技术的出现,人们需要根据当前的临床实践更新乳腺癌的费用。本研究的目的是估计瑞典乳腺癌的近期社会成本,并为健康经济评估提供基于人群的患者水平成本估算。这项基于患病率的疾病成本研究基于2019年瑞典多个国家登记处的数据。该分析采用了社会视角,考虑了直接医疗保健、非正式护理和生产力损失。总成本是用自下而上的微观成本法估算的。每位患者年的直接费用也按亚组估计,包括年龄组、乳腺癌亚型、诊断时乳腺癌分期和转移状态定义的疾病状态。自2008年以来诊断出的82960名乳腺癌患者到2019年底还活着。在瑞典,乳腺癌的年度社会成本为6.32亿欧元,其中直接医疗保健、非正式护理和生产力损失分别占37%、5%和57%。人均费用为61欧元。直接医疗保健(包括住院/门诊护理和处方药)的费用因亚组而异,其中年龄较小、分期较高和不良亚型较多与每位患者年的费用较高相关。诊断为新发转移性癌症的患者每年的平均费用最高。结论乳腺癌是瑞典的一大经济负担。每位患者每年的平均费用估计为未来乳腺癌筛查和治疗的健康经济评估提供了信息。
{"title":"Breaking down the costs for breast cancer: Insights from Sweden's national quality register","authors":"Xiaoyang Du ,&nbsp;Leo Gkekos ,&nbsp;Balram Rai ,&nbsp;Anna L.V. Johansson ,&nbsp;Irma Fredriksson ,&nbsp;Mattias Rantalainen ,&nbsp;Emelie Heintz ,&nbsp;Shuang Hao ,&nbsp;Mark Clements","doi":"10.1016/j.breast.2025.104646","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.breast.2025.104646","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>With new emerging technologies for diagnostics and treatment for breast cancer, there is a demand for updated breast cancer costs based on current clinical practice. The objectives of this study were to estimate recent societal costs of breast cancer in Sweden and provide population-based patient-level cost estimates for health economic evaluations.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>This prevalence-based cost-of-illness study was based on 2019 data linking multiple Swedish national registers. The analysis employed a societal perspective considering direct health care, informal care, and productivity losses. Total costs were estimated using a bottom-up micro-costing approach. Direct costs per patient-year were also estimated by subgroups, including age group, breast cancer subtype, breast cancer stage at diagnosis, and disease state defined by metastatic status.</div></div><div><h3>Findings</h3><div>82,960 breast cancer patients diagnosed since 2008 were alive by the end of 2019. The annual societal cost of breast cancer in Sweden was €632 million, where the direct health care, informal care, and productivity losses accounted for 37 %, 5 %, and 57 %, respectively. The cost per capita was €61. Costs of direct health care, including inpatient/outpatient care and prescribed drugs, varied by subgroups, where younger age, higher stage, and more adverse subtypes were associated with higher costs per patient-year. Patients with a diagnosis of de novo metastatic cancer incurred the highest mean cost per patient-year.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>Breast cancer represents a large economic burden in Sweden. The mean cost estimates per patient-year are informative to future health economic evaluations for breast cancer screening and treatment.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":9093,"journal":{"name":"Breast","volume":"85 ","pages":"Article 104646"},"PeriodicalIF":7.9,"publicationDate":"2026-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145518957","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
期刊
Breast
全部 Geobiology Appl. Clay Sci. Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta J. Hydrol. Org. Geochem. Carbon Balance Manage. Contrib. Mineral. Petrol. Int. J. Biometeorol. IZV-PHYS SOLID EART+ J. Atmos. Chem. Acta Oceanolog. Sin. Acta Geophys. ACTA GEOL POL ACTA PETROL SIN ACTA GEOL SIN-ENGL AAPG Bull. Acta Geochimica Adv. Atmos. Sci. Adv. Meteorol. Am. J. Phys. Anthropol. Am. J. Sci. Am. Mineral. Annu. Rev. Earth Planet. Sci. Appl. Geochem. Aquat. Geochem. Ann. Glaciol. Archaeol. Anthropol. Sci. ARCHAEOMETRY ARCT ANTARCT ALP RES Asia-Pac. J. Atmos. Sci. ATMOSPHERE-BASEL Atmos. Res. Aust. J. Earth Sci. Atmos. Chem. Phys. Atmos. Meas. Tech. Basin Res. Big Earth Data BIOGEOSCIENCES Geostand. Geoanal. Res. GEOLOGY Geosci. J. Geochem. J. Geochem. Trans. Geosci. Front. Geol. Ore Deposits Global Biogeochem. Cycles Gondwana Res. Geochem. Int. Geol. J. Geophys. Prospect. Geosci. Model Dev. GEOL BELG GROUNDWATER Hydrogeol. J. Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci. Hydrol. Processes Int. J. Climatol. Int. J. Earth Sci. Int. Geol. Rev. Int. J. Disaster Risk Reduct. Int. J. Geomech. Int. J. Geog. Inf. Sci. Isl. Arc J. Afr. Earth. Sci. J. Adv. Model. Earth Syst. J APPL METEOROL CLIM J. Atmos. Oceanic Technol. J. Atmos. Sol. Terr. Phys. J. Clim. J. Earth Sci. J. Earth Syst. Sci. J. Environ. Eng. Geophys. J. Geog. Sci. Mineral. Mag. Miner. Deposita Mon. Weather Rev. Nat. Hazards Earth Syst. Sci. Nat. Clim. Change Nat. Geosci. Ocean Dyn. Ocean and Coastal Research npj Clim. Atmos. Sci. Ocean Modell. Ocean Sci. Ore Geol. Rev. OCEAN SCI J Paleontol. J. PALAEOGEOGR PALAEOCL PERIOD MINERAL PETROLOGY+ Phys. Chem. Miner. Polar Sci. Prog. Oceanogr. Quat. Sci. Rev. Q. J. Eng. Geol. Hydrogeol. RADIOCARBON Pure Appl. Geophys. Resour. Geol. Rev. Geophys. Sediment. Geol.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1