Pub Date : 2026-01-31DOI: 10.1016/j.breast.2026.104716
Akshat Verma, Dileep Ramesh Hoysal, Amar Deshpande, Rajendra A Badwe
{"title":"Letter to the Editor \"Adjuvant ovarian function suppression and aromatase inhibitors in premenopausal patients with hormone receptor-positive, HER2-positive breast cancer\".","authors":"Akshat Verma, Dileep Ramesh Hoysal, Amar Deshpande, Rajendra A Badwe","doi":"10.1016/j.breast.2026.104716","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.breast.2026.104716","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":9093,"journal":{"name":"Breast","volume":" ","pages":"104716"},"PeriodicalIF":7.9,"publicationDate":"2026-01-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146123828","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2026-01-30DOI: 10.1016/j.breast.2026.104717
Giorgio Tettamanti, Annie Pedersen, Maria Feychting, Bianca Tesi, Cecilie Ejerskov, Mia Aagaard Doherty, Emma Tham, Anna Skarin Nordenvall, Line Kenborg, Ann Nordgren
Background: An increased risk of breast cancer has been reported in women with neurofibromatosis type 1 (NF1), especially at younger ages, and NF1-related breast cancer has been associated with poor survival. We performed a large population-based cohort study to estimate the age-related breast cancer risk and survival in Danish and Swedish women with NF1.
Patients and methods: We used national registers to identify all women with a diagnosis of NF1 in Denmark and Sweden born between 1930 and 1990 (Denmark) or 1987 (Sweden). Age- and sex-matched comparisons were randomly selected from population registers. Cox proportional hazards models were used to study the association between NF1, breast cancer risk, and overall 5-year mortality after a breast cancer diagnosis.
Results: We included 2164 women with NF1 and 71 586 comparisons. A two-fold increased risk of breast cancer was observed in women with NF1 (hazard ratio (HR) 1.94, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.59-2.36). The strongest association was observed in women between 30 and 39 years of age (HR = 3.98, 95% CI 2.16-7.32). Five-year mortality after a breast cancer diagnosis was higher in women with NF1 (HR = 1.98, 95% CI 1.31-2.99).
Conclusions: Our results suggest that although increased, the risk of breast cancer in women with NF1 is not as high as previously reported, particularly among young women. These findings add to previous data and will contribute to the gathered knowledge needed to accurately address the risk of breast cancer in women with NF1.
背景:有报道称1型神经纤维瘤病(NF1)的女性患乳腺癌的风险增加,尤其是在年轻时,NF1相关的乳腺癌与较差的生存率相关。我们进行了一项基于人群的大型队列研究,以估计丹麦和瑞典NF1女性的年龄相关乳腺癌风险和生存率。患者和方法:我们使用国家登记来确定在丹麦和瑞典出生于1930年至1990年(丹麦)或1987年(瑞典)之间诊断为NF1的所有女性。年龄和性别匹配的比较是从人口登记中随机选择的。采用Cox比例风险模型研究NF1、乳腺癌风险和乳腺癌诊断后总体5年死亡率之间的关系。结果:我们纳入了2164名NF1女性和71,586名对照。NF1患者患乳腺癌的风险增加了两倍(风险比(HR) 1.94, 95%可信区间(CI) 1.59-2.36)。在30 - 39岁的女性中观察到最强的相关性(HR = 3.98, 95% CI 2.16-7.32)。NF1女性乳腺癌诊断后的5年死亡率更高(HR = 1.98, 95% CI 1.31-2.99)。结论:我们的研究结果表明,NF1患者的乳腺癌风险虽然增加,但并不像以前报道的那样高,特别是在年轻女性中。这些发现补充了以前的数据,并将有助于准确解决NF1妇女患乳腺癌风险所需的知识。
{"title":"Breast cancer risk in women with neurofibromatosis type 1: a register-based cohort study from Denmark and Sweden.","authors":"Giorgio Tettamanti, Annie Pedersen, Maria Feychting, Bianca Tesi, Cecilie Ejerskov, Mia Aagaard Doherty, Emma Tham, Anna Skarin Nordenvall, Line Kenborg, Ann Nordgren","doi":"10.1016/j.breast.2026.104717","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.breast.2026.104717","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>An increased risk of breast cancer has been reported in women with neurofibromatosis type 1 (NF1), especially at younger ages, and NF1-related breast cancer has been associated with poor survival. We performed a large population-based cohort study to estimate the age-related breast cancer risk and survival in Danish and Swedish women with NF1.</p><p><strong>Patients and methods: </strong>We used national registers to identify all women with a diagnosis of NF1 in Denmark and Sweden born between 1930 and 1990 (Denmark) or 1987 (Sweden). Age- and sex-matched comparisons were randomly selected from population registers. Cox proportional hazards models were used to study the association between NF1, breast cancer risk, and overall 5-year mortality after a breast cancer diagnosis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We included 2164 women with NF1 and 71 586 comparisons. A two-fold increased risk of breast cancer was observed in women with NF1 (hazard ratio (HR) 1.94, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.59-2.36). The strongest association was observed in women between 30 and 39 years of age (HR = 3.98, 95% CI 2.16-7.32). Five-year mortality after a breast cancer diagnosis was higher in women with NF1 (HR = 1.98, 95% CI 1.31-2.99).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Our results suggest that although increased, the risk of breast cancer in women with NF1 is not as high as previously reported, particularly among young women. These findings add to previous data and will contribute to the gathered knowledge needed to accurately address the risk of breast cancer in women with NF1.</p>","PeriodicalId":9093,"journal":{"name":"Breast","volume":"86 ","pages":"104717"},"PeriodicalIF":7.9,"publicationDate":"2026-01-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146123808","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2026-01-30DOI: 10.1016/j.breast.2026.104715
Sergio Pannunzio, Luca Mastrantoni, Noemi Maliziola, Letizia Pontolillo, Giovanna Garufi, Elena Di Monte, Alessandra Emiliani, Margherita Sgambato, Anna Cardillo, Antonella Palazzo, Armando Orlandi, Giampaolo Tortora, Emilio Bria
Background: In HR+/HER2- metastatic breast cancer (MBC), CDK4/6 inhibitors combined with endocrine therapy (ET) significantly improve progression-free survival (PFS). Machine learning (ML) approaches may improve individualized progression risk estimation.
Methods: We retrospectively analysed HR+/HER2- MBC patients treated with first-line CDK4/6i plus ET to develop CoxNet regression and Gradient Boosting Machine (GBM) models from baseline clinicopathological features. The primary endpoint was PFS prediction. The dataset was split into a 70/30 train/validation set. Performance was assessed by Harrell's C-index (1000 bootstrap replicates). Risk stratification was performed using Gaussian Mixture Modeling (GMM) to define high- and low-risk groups. Cox regression estimated the corresponding hazard ratios (HR). Early progression at 6 months (EP) prediction was evaluated using the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC).
Results: 459 patients were included, with a median follow-up of 43.7 months (95% CI 39.6-48.3). Median PFS was 29.3 months (95% CI 24.0-33.7). Both ML models achieved strong predictive performance, with a Harrell's C-index of 0.74 (95% CI 0.67-0.80) in the validation set. The main predictors were liver metastases, Ki67 expression, and primary endocrine resistance. Stratification defined two risk groups with significantly different PFS in the validation set (HR 2.58, 95% CI 1.65-4.03, p = 3.3 × 10-5). Median PFS was 34.8 (95%CI 24.0-52.4) in the low-risk and 10.6 (95%CI 7.7-14.6) in the high-risk group. For EP prediction, the model achieved an AUROC of 0.77 (95% CI 0.61-0.89).
Conclusions: This study supports the clinical applicability ML models using baseline clinicopathological variables for individualized risk stratification in HR+/HER2- MBC.
背景:在HR+/HER2-转移性乳腺癌(MBC)中,CDK4/6抑制剂联合内分泌治疗(ET)可显著提高无进展生存期(PFS)。机器学习(ML)方法可以改善个体化进展风险估计。方法:我们回顾性分析一线CDK4/6i + ET治疗的HR+/HER2- MBC患者,从基线临床病理特征建立CoxNet回归和梯度增强机(GBM)模型。主要终点为PFS预测。数据集被分成70/30的训练/验证集。采用Harrell’s C-index(1000次bootstrap重复)评价性能。使用高斯混合模型(GMM)进行风险分层,以定义高风险和低风险组。Cox回归估计相应的风险比(HR)。使用受试者工作特征曲线下面积(AUROC)评估6个月早期进展(EP)预测。结果:纳入459例患者,中位随访43.7个月(95% CI 39.6-48.3)。中位PFS为29.3个月(95% CI 24.0-33.7)。两种ML模型都获得了很强的预测性能,验证集中的Harrell C-index为0.74 (95% CI 0.67-0.80)。主要预测因素为肝转移、Ki67表达和原发性内分泌抵抗。分层定义了验证集中PFS有显著差异的两个危险组(HR 2.58, 95% CI 1.65-4.03, p = 3.3 × 10-5)。低危组中位PFS为34.8 (95%CI 24.0-52.4),高危组中位PFS为10.6 (95%CI 7.7-14.6)。对于EP预测,该模型的AUROC为0.77 (95% CI为0.61-0.89)。结论:本研究支持基于基线临床病理变量的ML模型在HR+/HER2- MBC个体化风险分层中的临床适用性。
{"title":"Predicting progression-free survival in hormone-receptor positive (HR+/HER2-) metastatic breast cancer (MBC) treated with CDK4/6 inhibitors: A machine learning approach.","authors":"Sergio Pannunzio, Luca Mastrantoni, Noemi Maliziola, Letizia Pontolillo, Giovanna Garufi, Elena Di Monte, Alessandra Emiliani, Margherita Sgambato, Anna Cardillo, Antonella Palazzo, Armando Orlandi, Giampaolo Tortora, Emilio Bria","doi":"10.1016/j.breast.2026.104715","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.breast.2026.104715","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>In HR+/HER2- metastatic breast cancer (MBC), CDK4/6 inhibitors combined with endocrine therapy (ET) significantly improve progression-free survival (PFS). Machine learning (ML) approaches may improve individualized progression risk estimation.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We retrospectively analysed HR+/HER2- MBC patients treated with first-line CDK4/6i plus ET to develop CoxNet regression and Gradient Boosting Machine (GBM) models from baseline clinicopathological features. The primary endpoint was PFS prediction. The dataset was split into a 70/30 train/validation set. Performance was assessed by Harrell's C-index (1000 bootstrap replicates). Risk stratification was performed using Gaussian Mixture Modeling (GMM) to define high- and low-risk groups. Cox regression estimated the corresponding hazard ratios (HR). Early progression at 6 months (EP) prediction was evaluated using the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>459 patients were included, with a median follow-up of 43.7 months (95% CI 39.6-48.3). Median PFS was 29.3 months (95% CI 24.0-33.7). Both ML models achieved strong predictive performance, with a Harrell's C-index of 0.74 (95% CI 0.67-0.80) in the validation set. The main predictors were liver metastases, Ki67 expression, and primary endocrine resistance. Stratification defined two risk groups with significantly different PFS in the validation set (HR 2.58, 95% CI 1.65-4.03, p = 3.3 × 10<sup>-5</sup>). Median PFS was 34.8 (95%CI 24.0-52.4) in the low-risk and 10.6 (95%CI 7.7-14.6) in the high-risk group. For EP prediction, the model achieved an AUROC of 0.77 (95% CI 0.61-0.89).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This study supports the clinical applicability ML models using baseline clinicopathological variables for individualized risk stratification in HR+/HER2- MBC.</p>","PeriodicalId":9093,"journal":{"name":"Breast","volume":"86 ","pages":"104715"},"PeriodicalIF":7.9,"publicationDate":"2026-01-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146117853","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2026-01-29DOI: 10.1016/j.breast.2026.104714
Ruth M O'Regan, Yue Ren, Yi Zhang, Gini F Fleming, Prudence A Francis, Olivia Pagani, Barbara A Walley, Roswitha Kammler, Patrizia Dell'Orto, Giuseppe Viale, Sherene Loi, Marco Colleoni, Kai Treuner, Meredith M Regan
Background: An adjusted Breast Cancer Index (BCI) model with an additional cutpoint identified postmenopausal women with hormone-receptor-positive node-negative disease at minimal (<5%) risk of distant recurrence (DR) within 10 years.
Methods: 2025 premenopausal patients with hormone-receptor-positive node-negative breast cancer, randomized to adjuvant endocrine therapy in SOFT and TEXT (35.6% and 40.4% received adjuvant chemotherapy, respectively), previously had BCI assessed. The additional BCI cutpoint re-classified a subset of the low-risk group into minimal-risk; those in intermediate- or high-risk groups were unchanged. The 10-year DR was estimated by Kaplan-Meier method.
Results: The adjusted BCI model re-classified 17.8 % and 19.6 % of node-negative disease in SOFT and TEXT into BCI minimal-risk groups; 43.2 % and 38.3 % remained classified in low-risk groups, respectively. In SOFT, the estimated 10-year DR was 2.3 % (95 %CI 0.9-6.0 %) and 4.1 % (95 %CI 2.6-6.5 %) in the minimal-risk and revised low-risk groups, respectively. In TEXT, the estimated 10-year DR was 2.0 % (95 %CI 0.7-6.2 %) and 4.6 % (95 %CI 2.8-7.7 %) in the minimal- and low-risk groups, respectively.
Conclusions: This study confirmed prognostic ability of the minimal-risk BCI cutpoint to classify patients estimated to have minimal-risk of distant recurrence within 10 years among premenopausal patients treated for hormone-receptor-positive node-negative breast cancer, providing relevant information for personalizing adjuvant endocrine therapy. SOFT: (clinicaltrials.gov NCT00066690) TEXT: (clinicaltrials.gov NCT00066703).
背景:调整后的乳腺癌指数(BCI)模型增加了一个额外的临界点,以最小限度地确定患有激素受体阳性淋巴结阴性疾病的绝经后妇女(方法:2025例绝经前激素受体阳性淋巴结阴性乳腺癌患者,在SOFT和TEXT中随机分配到辅助内分泌治疗组(分别为35.6%和40.4%接受辅助化疗),之前进行过BCI评估。额外的脑机接口切点将低风险组的一个子集重新分类为最低风险;中等或高危人群则没有变化。用Kaplan-Meier法估计10年DR。结果:调整后的BCI模型将SOFT和TEXT患者中17.8%和19.6%的淋巴结阴性疾病重新划分为BCI低危组;43.2%和38.3%的人仍然被划分为低风险组。在SOFT中,在最小风险组和修正的低风险组中,估计的10年DR分别为2.3% (95% CI 0.9- 6.0%)和4.1% (95% CI 2.6- 6.5%)。在TEXT中,最低风险组和低风险组的估计10年DR分别为2.0% (95% CI 0.7- 6.2%)和4.6% (95% CI 2.8- 7.7%)。结论:本研究证实了最小风险BCI切点对绝经前激素受体阳性淋巴结阴性乳腺癌患者10年内远处复发风险最小的患者进行分类的预后能力,为个性化辅助内分泌治疗提供了相关信息。软:(clinicaltrials.gov NCT00066690)文本:(clinicaltrials.gov NCT00066703)。
{"title":"Identifying premenopausal patients with early-stage hormone receptor-positive breast cancer at minimal risk of distant recurrence by breast cancer index.","authors":"Ruth M O'Regan, Yue Ren, Yi Zhang, Gini F Fleming, Prudence A Francis, Olivia Pagani, Barbara A Walley, Roswitha Kammler, Patrizia Dell'Orto, Giuseppe Viale, Sherene Loi, Marco Colleoni, Kai Treuner, Meredith M Regan","doi":"10.1016/j.breast.2026.104714","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.breast.2026.104714","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>An adjusted Breast Cancer Index (BCI) model with an additional cutpoint identified postmenopausal women with hormone-receptor-positive node-negative disease at minimal (<5%) risk of distant recurrence (DR) within 10 years.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>2025 premenopausal patients with hormone-receptor-positive node-negative breast cancer, randomized to adjuvant endocrine therapy in SOFT and TEXT (35.6% and 40.4% received adjuvant chemotherapy, respectively), previously had BCI assessed. The additional BCI cutpoint re-classified a subset of the low-risk group into minimal-risk; those in intermediate- or high-risk groups were unchanged. The 10-year DR was estimated by Kaplan-Meier method.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The adjusted BCI model re-classified 17.8 % and 19.6 % of node-negative disease in SOFT and TEXT into BCI minimal-risk groups; 43.2 % and 38.3 % remained classified in low-risk groups, respectively. In SOFT, the estimated 10-year DR was 2.3 % (95 %CI 0.9-6.0 %) and 4.1 % (95 %CI 2.6-6.5 %) in the minimal-risk and revised low-risk groups, respectively. In TEXT, the estimated 10-year DR was 2.0 % (95 %CI 0.7-6.2 %) and 4.6 % (95 %CI 2.8-7.7 %) in the minimal- and low-risk groups, respectively.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This study confirmed prognostic ability of the minimal-risk BCI cutpoint to classify patients estimated to have minimal-risk of distant recurrence within 10 years among premenopausal patients treated for hormone-receptor-positive node-negative breast cancer, providing relevant information for personalizing adjuvant endocrine therapy. SOFT: (clinicaltrials.gov NCT00066690) TEXT: (clinicaltrials.gov NCT00066703).</p>","PeriodicalId":9093,"journal":{"name":"Breast","volume":"86 ","pages":"104714"},"PeriodicalIF":7.9,"publicationDate":"2026-01-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146117864","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2026-01-27DOI: 10.1016/j.breast.2026.104703
Claudia Noto, Lorenzo Foffano, Fabiola Giudici, Elisabetta Molteni, Alessandra Franzoni, Martina Tessitori, Linda Cucciniello, Silvia Bolzonello, Lucia Da Ros, Lucia Bortot, Elena Scudeler, Brenno Pastò, Giulia Cudia, Serena Della Rossa, Marta Bonotto, Alessandro Marco Minisini, Giuseppe Damante, Barbara Belletti, Lorenzo Gerratana, Fabio Puglisi
Background: CDK4/6 inhibitors (CDK4/6i) in combination with endocrine therapy (ET) represent the standard of care for hormone receptor-positive, HER2-negative (HR+/HER2-) metastatic breast cancer (MBC) patients. However, no head-to-head randomized trials have directly compared palbociclib, ribociclib, and abemaciclib. Moreover, predictive biomarkers of resistance to CDK4/6i remain largely undefined. This study aimed to evaluate circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA)-based epigenetic and fragmentomic biomarkers as potential predictors of response and resistance in patients receiving CDK4/6i.
Methods: We conducted a biomarker-driven analysis within the prospective, multicenter MAGNETIC.1 study, enrolling 149 patients with HR+/HER2- MBC treated with first-line endocrine therapy and a CDK4/6 inhibitor. Plasma samples were collected at baseline and during treatment (3 and 6 months). Droplet digital PCR was used to assess ESR1 promoter methylation and ACTB fragmentomic profiles. Progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were evaluated, and molecular dynamics were compared between treatment groups.
Results: After a median follow-up of 34.8 months, no statistically significant differences in PFS or OS were observed between ribociclib and palbociclib treated patients, although ribociclib was associated with numerically longer PFS and higher survival rates. At the molecular level, palbociclib treatment was characterized by transient increases in ESR1 promoter methylation at the first evaluation and a rebound in ACTBshort fragment levels at six months relative to baseline. These dynamic patterns were not observed among patients receiving ribociclib.
Conclusions: ctDNA-based methylation and fragmentomic profiling revealed exploratory, treatment specific molecular dynamics, highlighting biological differences between CDK4/6 inhibitors. These findings support the feasibility of liquid biopsy-based biomarker studies in this setting, although their potential clinical relevance remains preliminary and requires validation in larger cohorts with earlier and more granular on-treatment timepoints.
{"title":"Epigenetic and fragment-based profiling across CDK4/6 inhibitors in first-line HR+/HER2- metastatic breast cancer. An ancillary analysis of the MAGNETIC.1 study.","authors":"Claudia Noto, Lorenzo Foffano, Fabiola Giudici, Elisabetta Molteni, Alessandra Franzoni, Martina Tessitori, Linda Cucciniello, Silvia Bolzonello, Lucia Da Ros, Lucia Bortot, Elena Scudeler, Brenno Pastò, Giulia Cudia, Serena Della Rossa, Marta Bonotto, Alessandro Marco Minisini, Giuseppe Damante, Barbara Belletti, Lorenzo Gerratana, Fabio Puglisi","doi":"10.1016/j.breast.2026.104703","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.breast.2026.104703","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>CDK4/6 inhibitors (CDK4/6i) in combination with endocrine therapy (ET) represent the standard of care for hormone receptor-positive, HER2-negative (HR+/HER2-) metastatic breast cancer (MBC) patients. However, no head-to-head randomized trials have directly compared palbociclib, ribociclib, and abemaciclib. Moreover, predictive biomarkers of resistance to CDK4/6i remain largely undefined. This study aimed to evaluate circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA)-based epigenetic and fragmentomic biomarkers as potential predictors of response and resistance in patients receiving CDK4/6i.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a biomarker-driven analysis within the prospective, multicenter MAGNETIC.1 study, enrolling 149 patients with HR+/HER2- MBC treated with first-line endocrine therapy and a CDK4/6 inhibitor. Plasma samples were collected at baseline and during treatment (3 and 6 months). Droplet digital PCR was used to assess ESR1 promoter methylation and ACTB fragmentomic profiles. Progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were evaluated, and molecular dynamics were compared between treatment groups.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>After a median follow-up of 34.8 months, no statistically significant differences in PFS or OS were observed between ribociclib and palbociclib treated patients, although ribociclib was associated with numerically longer PFS and higher survival rates. At the molecular level, palbociclib treatment was characterized by transient increases in ESR1 promoter methylation at the first evaluation and a rebound in ACTB<sub>short</sub> fragment levels at six months relative to baseline. These dynamic patterns were not observed among patients receiving ribociclib.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>ctDNA-based methylation and fragmentomic profiling revealed exploratory, treatment specific molecular dynamics, highlighting biological differences between CDK4/6 inhibitors. These findings support the feasibility of liquid biopsy-based biomarker studies in this setting, although their potential clinical relevance remains preliminary and requires validation in larger cohorts with earlier and more granular on-treatment timepoints.</p>","PeriodicalId":9093,"journal":{"name":"Breast","volume":"86 ","pages":"104703"},"PeriodicalIF":7.9,"publicationDate":"2026-01-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146131201","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2026-01-27DOI: 10.1016/j.breast.2026.104710
Chiara Dauccia, Marco Bruzzone, Luca Arecco, Eva Blondeaux, Marianna Sirico, Riccardo Gerosa, Maria Alice Franzoi, Mariana Brandão, Lorenzo Perrone, Paolo Pedrazzoli, Christine Desmedt, Serena Di Cosimo, Claudio Vernieri, Laetitia Collet, Matteo Lambertini, Evandro de Azambuja, Elisa Agostinetto
Background: Higher body mass index (BMI) is a risk factor for breast cancer (BC) development, but the relationship with BC subtypes in pre- and post-menopausal women remains unclear.
Methods: We performed a systematic search from PubMed, Embase and Cochrane databases until 09/24 (CRD42020206108) for cohort and case-control studies assessing the association between BMI and BC subtypes and/or menopausal status. BC risk in overweight (BMI 25-29.9 kg/m2) or obese (BMI≥30 kg/m2) subjects was compared to risk in under/normal weight (BMI<25 kg/m2). BC subtypes were classified as i) ER-positive (regardless HER2-status) ii) ER-negative (regardless HER2-status) iii) HER2-positive (regardless ER-status); iv) triple-negative BC (TNBC).
Results: Out of 2841 records screened, 33 studies (9 cohort and 24 case-control) including 2,103,181 women were eligible. Obesity was associated with a modestly increased risk of ER-positive BC (pOR 1.13; 95 % CI 1.03-1.24). In postmenopausal women, obesity was associated with a moderate higher risk of ER-positive BC (pOR 1.29; 95 % CI 1.18-1.41), while overweight was associated with an increased risk of ER-positive (pOR 1.14; 95 % CI 1.06-1.22) and HER2-positive BC (pOR 1.13; 95 % CI 1.05-1.22). In premenopausal women, overweight was linked with reduced risk of ER-positive (pOR 0.80 95 % CI 0.71-0.91) but increased risk of ER-negative BC (pOR 1.15 95 % CI 1.05-1.26) and TNBC (pOR 1.30; 95 % CI 1.15-1.47).
Conclusions: Obesity was associated with a modestly higher risk of ER-positive BC, driven by postmenopausal status. Considering potential confounders, in premenopausal women, higher BMI was associated with lower risk of ER-positive BC, and an increased risk of ER-negative BC.
背景:较高的身体质量指数(BMI)是乳腺癌(BC)发展的危险因素,但与绝经前和绝经后妇女BC亚型的关系尚不清楚。方法:我们从PubMed、Embase和Cochrane数据库(CRD42020206108)进行了系统检索,以评估BMI与BC亚型和/或绝经状态之间的关系。将超重(BMI 25-29.9 kg/m2)或肥胖(BMI≥30 kg/m2)受试者的BC风险与体重不足/正常(BMI2)受试者的风险进行比较。BC亚型分为i) er阳性(无论her2状态)ii) er阴性(无论her2状态)iii) her2阳性(无论er状态);iv)三阴性BC (TNBC)。结果:在筛选的2841条记录中,33项研究(9项队列研究和24项病例对照研究)包括2,103,181名妇女符合条件。肥胖与er阳性BC的风险适度增加相关(pOR 1.13; 95% CI 1.03-1.24)。在绝经后妇女中,肥胖与er阳性BC的中度高风险相关(pOR 1.29; 95% CI 1.18-1.41),而超重与er阳性BC (pOR 1.14; 95% CI 1.06-1.22)和her2阳性BC (pOR 1.13; 95% CI 1.05-1.22)的风险增加相关。在绝经前妇女中,超重与er阳性风险降低(pOR 0.80 95% CI 0.71-0.91)有关,但与er阴性BC (pOR 1.15 95% CI 1.05-1.26)和TNBC (pOR 1.30; 95% CI 1.15-1.47)的风险增加有关。结论:肥胖与绝经后状态下er阳性BC的适度增高风险相关。考虑到潜在的混杂因素,在绝经前妇女中,较高的BMI与较低的er阳性BC风险和较高的er阴性BC风险相关。
{"title":"Association between body mass index and risk of breast cancer according to breast cancer subtypes: A systematic review and meta-analysis.","authors":"Chiara Dauccia, Marco Bruzzone, Luca Arecco, Eva Blondeaux, Marianna Sirico, Riccardo Gerosa, Maria Alice Franzoi, Mariana Brandão, Lorenzo Perrone, Paolo Pedrazzoli, Christine Desmedt, Serena Di Cosimo, Claudio Vernieri, Laetitia Collet, Matteo Lambertini, Evandro de Azambuja, Elisa Agostinetto","doi":"10.1016/j.breast.2026.104710","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.breast.2026.104710","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Higher body mass index (BMI) is a risk factor for breast cancer (BC) development, but the relationship with BC subtypes in pre- and post-menopausal women remains unclear.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We performed a systematic search from PubMed, Embase and Cochrane databases until 09/24 (CRD42020206108) for cohort and case-control studies assessing the association between BMI and BC subtypes and/or menopausal status. BC risk in overweight (BMI 25-29.9 kg/m<sup>2</sup>) or obese (BMI≥30 kg/m<sup>2</sup>) subjects was compared to risk in under/normal weight (BMI<25 kg/m<sup>2</sup>). BC subtypes were classified as i) ER-positive (regardless HER2-status) ii) ER-negative (regardless HER2-status) iii) HER2-positive (regardless ER-status); iv) triple-negative BC (TNBC).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Out of 2841 records screened, 33 studies (9 cohort and 24 case-control) including 2,103,181 women were eligible. Obesity was associated with a modestly increased risk of ER-positive BC (pOR 1.13; 95 % CI 1.03-1.24). In postmenopausal women, obesity was associated with a moderate higher risk of ER-positive BC (pOR 1.29; 95 % CI 1.18-1.41), while overweight was associated with an increased risk of ER-positive (pOR 1.14; 95 % CI 1.06-1.22) and HER2-positive BC (pOR 1.13; 95 % CI 1.05-1.22). In premenopausal women, overweight was linked with reduced risk of ER-positive (pOR 0.80 95 % CI 0.71-0.91) but increased risk of ER-negative BC (pOR 1.15 95 % CI 1.05-1.26) and TNBC (pOR 1.30; 95 % CI 1.15-1.47).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Obesity was associated with a modestly higher risk of ER-positive BC, driven by postmenopausal status. Considering potential confounders, in premenopausal women, higher BMI was associated with lower risk of ER-positive BC, and an increased risk of ER-negative BC.</p>","PeriodicalId":9093,"journal":{"name":"Breast","volume":"86 ","pages":"104710"},"PeriodicalIF":7.9,"publicationDate":"2026-01-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146131250","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2026-01-27DOI: 10.1016/j.breast.2026.104712
Nikolay Alabi, Alan Nichol, Fumiya Inaba, Anita Carraro, Soufiane El-Hallani, Martial Guillaud
Breast cancer is the leading cause of cancer-related deaths among women worldwide. It is standard practice for patients to undergo a sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) with breast surgery for staging. However, more than 60% of patients with primary operable breast cancers do not have axillary lymph node metastases. Hence, most patients risk complications from SLNB, but do not benefit. There has been considerable research into non-invasive methods for axillary lymph node staging, but few are externally validated. We hypothesized that a new method using large-scale DNA organization (LDO) analysis on a biopsy of the breast primary could predict axillary metastases. LDO, which measures various nuclear characteristics such as the size, shape, and chromatin texture, has been correlated with a variety of clinical outcomes in different cancers, including survival in breast cancer. In this study, we determined that Random Forest models performed best for LDO analysis. On an external test set, our models using LDO features alone achieved an area under the curve (AUC) = 0.711 and clinicopathological features alone achieved AUC = 0.741. Our best and final model using LDO and clinicopathological features together achieved AUC = 0.775. We identified several LDO features that were important for predicting axillary lymph node metastases, including nuclear radius and staining intensity. We present the first histologically-based, externally-validated, and explainable machine learning model capable of predicting axillary lymph node metastases preoperatively.
{"title":"Large-scale DNA organization analysis of primary breast cancers for prediction of axillary lymph node metastases.","authors":"Nikolay Alabi, Alan Nichol, Fumiya Inaba, Anita Carraro, Soufiane El-Hallani, Martial Guillaud","doi":"10.1016/j.breast.2026.104712","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.breast.2026.104712","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Breast cancer is the leading cause of cancer-related deaths among women worldwide. It is standard practice for patients to undergo a sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) with breast surgery for staging. However, more than 60% of patients with primary operable breast cancers do not have axillary lymph node metastases. Hence, most patients risk complications from SLNB, but do not benefit. There has been considerable research into non-invasive methods for axillary lymph node staging, but few are externally validated. We hypothesized that a new method using large-scale DNA organization (LDO) analysis on a biopsy of the breast primary could predict axillary metastases. LDO, which measures various nuclear characteristics such as the size, shape, and chromatin texture, has been correlated with a variety of clinical outcomes in different cancers, including survival in breast cancer. In this study, we determined that Random Forest models performed best for LDO analysis. On an external test set, our models using LDO features alone achieved an area under the curve (AUC) = 0.711 and clinicopathological features alone achieved AUC = 0.741. Our best and final model using LDO and clinicopathological features together achieved AUC = 0.775. We identified several LDO features that were important for predicting axillary lymph node metastases, including nuclear radius and staining intensity. We present the first histologically-based, externally-validated, and explainable machine learning model capable of predicting axillary lymph node metastases preoperatively.</p>","PeriodicalId":9093,"journal":{"name":"Breast","volume":"86 ","pages":"104712"},"PeriodicalIF":7.9,"publicationDate":"2026-01-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146117929","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2026-01-21DOI: 10.1016/j.breast.2026.104708
Sangjun Lee , Soyeoun Kim
Global mammographic asymmetry (GA) is generally considered benign, and its association with subsequent breast cancer risk is unclear. We examined whether GA on screening mammography predicts short-term and long-term breast cancer and whether this varies by Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System (BI-RADS) breast density. In this retrospective cohort study using the Korean National Health Insurance Service screening programme, we included women aged ≥40 years who underwent screening mammography in 2009–2010 and had no prior breast cancer. GA and BI-RADS density were recorded on baseline mammograms; incident invasive breast cancer through December 31, 2019 was ascertained from insurance claims. Cox proportional hazards models estimated adjusted hazard ratios (aHRs) for breast cancer associated with GA overall and by BI-RADS density and follow-up interval (<1, 1–2 and ≥2 years), adjusting for demographic, reproductive and lifestyle factors. Among 5,475,113 women, GA was present in 4.0 %. Overall, GA was associated with a modestly increased breast cancer risk (aHR 1.15; 95 % CI 1.11–1.19), strongest within 1 year of screening (aHR 1.90; 95 % CI 1.70–2.12). In women with BI-RADS 1 breasts, GA doubled overall risk (aHR 2.03) and quadrupled short-term risk (<1 year: aHR 4.14), whereas in BI-RADS 4 breasts GA did not increase overall risk (aHR 0.94). GA is uncommon but identifies women at substantially elevated short-term breast cancer risk, particularly those with non-dense breasts, and has limited long-term prognostic value in extremely dense breasts. These findings support consideration of short-interval follow-up or supplemental imaging when GA is reported in non-dense breasts.
乳房x线摄影不对称(GA)通常被认为是良性的,其与随后的乳腺癌风险的关系尚不清楚。我们研究了筛查乳房x线摄影的GA是否能预测短期和长期乳腺癌,以及这是否因乳房成像报告和数据系统(BI-RADS)乳腺密度而异。在这项使用韩国国民健康保险服务筛查项目的回顾性队列研究中,我们纳入了年龄≥40岁、在2009-2010年接受乳房x光筛查且既往无乳腺癌的女性。在基线乳房x线照片上记录GA和BI-RADS密度;从保险索赔中确定了截至2019年12月31日的侵袭性乳腺癌事件。Cox比例风险模型通过BI-RADS密度和随访间隔(1年、1年- 2年和≥2年)来估计与GA相关的乳腺癌的调整风险比(aHRs),并对人口统计学、生殖和生活方式因素进行了调整。在5,475,113名女性中,4.0%存在GA。总体而言,GA与适度增加的乳腺癌风险相关(aHR 1.15; 95% CI 1.11-1.19),在筛查后1年内最强(aHR 1.90; 95% CI 1.70-2.12)。在BI-RADS 1型乳房的女性中,GA的总风险增加了一倍(aHR 2.03),短期风险增加了四倍(1年:aHR 4.14),而BI-RADS 4型乳房的GA没有增加总风险(aHR 0.94)。GA并不常见,但可以识别出短期乳腺癌风险显著升高的女性,特别是那些乳房不致密的女性,而对于极致密的乳房,GA的长期预后价值有限。这些发现支持在非致密乳腺中报告GA时考虑短间隔随访或补充成像。
{"title":"Global mammographic asymmetry and short-term breast cancer risk by breast density: a nationwide screening cohort of 5.5 million women","authors":"Sangjun Lee , Soyeoun Kim","doi":"10.1016/j.breast.2026.104708","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.breast.2026.104708","url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Global mammographic asymmetry (GA) is generally considered benign, and its association with subsequent breast cancer risk is unclear. We examined whether GA on screening mammography predicts short-term and long-term breast cancer and whether this varies by Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System (BI-RADS) breast density. In this retrospective cohort study using the Korean National Health Insurance Service screening programme, we included women aged ≥40 years who underwent screening mammography in 2009–2010 and had no prior breast cancer. GA and BI-RADS density were recorded on baseline mammograms; incident invasive breast cancer through December 31, 2019 was ascertained from insurance claims. Cox proportional hazards models estimated adjusted hazard ratios (aHRs) for breast cancer associated with GA overall and by BI-RADS density and follow-up interval (<1, 1–2 and ≥2 years), adjusting for demographic, reproductive and lifestyle factors. Among 5,475,113 women, GA was present in 4.0 %. Overall, GA was associated with a modestly increased breast cancer risk (aHR 1.15; 95 % CI 1.11–1.19), strongest within 1 year of screening (aHR 1.90; 95 % CI 1.70–2.12). In women with BI-RADS 1 breasts, GA doubled overall risk (aHR 2.03) and quadrupled short-term risk (<1 year: aHR 4.14), whereas in BI-RADS 4 breasts GA did not increase overall risk (aHR 0.94). GA is uncommon but identifies women at substantially elevated short-term breast cancer risk, particularly those with non-dense breasts, and has limited long-term prognostic value in extremely dense breasts. These findings support consideration of short-interval follow-up or supplemental imaging when GA is reported in non-dense breasts.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":9093,"journal":{"name":"Breast","volume":"86 ","pages":"Article 104708"},"PeriodicalIF":7.9,"publicationDate":"2026-01-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146075840","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
This systematic review aimed to identify risk factors for fibrosis and unfavorable cosmetic outcomes after breast conserving therapy (BCT) for breast cancer in the light of contemporary oncoplastic surgery and 3D-radiotherapy techniques.
Methods
The systematic literature search was carried out in Embase, Ovid Medline, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, and CINAHL. Studies published after 2005, reporting two or more risk factors for fibrosis or unfavorable cosmetic outcomes as primary outcomes were eligible for inclusion. Only prospective studies with 100 or more patients analyzed were included. The Quality In Prognosis Studies tool and Cochrane risk-of-bias tool were used to assess risk of bias. Patient, tumor, and treatment-related predictors were identified.
Results
Twelve papers investigating 12.118 patients were identified. Risk factors for both the development of fibrosis and unfavorable cosmetic outcomes were increasing age, larger tumor size, re-resection, poor early cosmetic outcomes before the start of radiotherapy, high boost dose, boost volume per 10 cc, homogeneity-index, dose whole breast irradiation, and adjuvant chemotherapy. No specific risk factors in the setting of BCT with complex oncoplastic surgery techniques or ultra-hypo fractionated radiotherapy were identified in this review.
Conclusion
The risk factors identified in this review are largely similar to those found in 2D-radiotherapy studies; dose homogeneity was additionally identified. Administering chemotherapy before radiotherapy should be considered for patients requiring both treatments. However, the lack of sufficient high-quality data regarding BCT with (complex) oncoplastic surgery techniques and ultra-hypo fractionated radiotherapy schedules address the need for large, multidisciplinary prospective studies with long-term follow-up.
背景:本系统综述旨在根据当代肿瘤整形手术和3d放疗技术,确定乳腺癌保乳治疗(BCT)后纤维化和不良美容结果的危险因素。方法:在Embase、Ovid Medline、Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials和CINAHL中进行系统文献检索。2005年以后发表的将两个或两个以上纤维化风险因素或不良美容结局作为主要结局的研究符合纳入标准。仅纳入了100例或更多患者的前瞻性研究。使用预后质量研究工具和Cochrane风险偏倚工具评估偏倚风险。确定了患者、肿瘤和治疗相关的预测因素。结果:共收录12篇论文,共12.118例患者。发生纤维化和不良美容结果的危险因素包括年龄增加、肿瘤大小增大、再切除、放疗开始前早期美容结果不佳、高增强剂量、每10cc增强体积、均匀性指数、全乳照射剂量和辅助化疗。在本综述中,没有发现复杂肿瘤整形手术技术或超低分割放疗的BCT设置的特定危险因素。结论:本综述中发现的危险因素与2d放疗研究中发现的危险因素基本相似;另外还确定了剂量均匀性。对于同时需要化疗和放疗的患者,应考虑在放疗前进行化疗。然而,缺乏足够高质量的BCT(复杂)肿瘤整形手术技术和超低分割放疗计划的数据,需要进行大规模、多学科、长期随访的前瞻性研究。
{"title":"Risk factors for breast fibrosis and unfavorable cosmetic outcomes after breast conserving therapy in the contemporary treatment era: a systematic review","authors":"M.C.A.W. Notenboom , W.D. Heemsbergen , M. Franckena , L.B. Koppert , M.A.M. Mureau , R.A. Nout , M.B.E. Menke-Pluijmers , F.E. Froklage","doi":"10.1016/j.breast.2026.104707","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.breast.2026.104707","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>This systematic review aimed to identify risk factors for fibrosis and unfavorable cosmetic outcomes after breast conserving therapy (BCT) for breast cancer in the light of contemporary oncoplastic surgery and 3D-radiotherapy techniques.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>The systematic literature search was carried out in Embase, Ovid Medline, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, and CINAHL. Studies published after 2005, reporting two or more risk factors for fibrosis or unfavorable cosmetic outcomes as primary outcomes were eligible for inclusion. Only prospective studies with 100 or more patients analyzed were included. The Quality In Prognosis Studies tool and Cochrane risk-of-bias tool were used to assess risk of bias. Patient, tumor, and treatment-related predictors were identified.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Twelve papers investigating 12.118 patients were identified. Risk factors for both the development of fibrosis and unfavorable cosmetic outcomes were increasing age, larger tumor size, re-resection, poor early cosmetic outcomes before the start of radiotherapy, high boost dose, boost volume per 10 cc, homogeneity-index, dose whole breast irradiation, and adjuvant chemotherapy. No specific risk factors in the setting of BCT with complex oncoplastic surgery techniques or ultra-hypo fractionated radiotherapy were identified in this review.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>The risk factors identified in this review are largely similar to those found in 2D-radiotherapy studies; dose homogeneity was additionally identified. Administering chemotherapy before radiotherapy should be considered for patients requiring both treatments. However, the lack of sufficient high-quality data regarding BCT with (complex) oncoplastic surgery techniques and ultra-hypo fractionated radiotherapy schedules address the need for large, multidisciplinary prospective studies with long-term follow-up.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":9093,"journal":{"name":"Breast","volume":"86 ","pages":"Article 104707"},"PeriodicalIF":7.9,"publicationDate":"2026-01-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146046202","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2026-01-20DOI: 10.1016/j.breast.2026.104705
Sara Paltrinieri , Margherita Schiavi , Barbara Bressi , Angela Contri , Martina Torreggiani , Laura Bernardi , Elisa Mazzini , Maria Chiara Bassi , Silvia di Leo , Luca Ghirotto , Stefania Costi
Cancer-related financial toxicity (FT) is a challenge of living with and beyond breast cancer (BC). A systematic review and meta-synthesis was conducted to report the experience of individuals with BC regarding cancer-related FT. Data were searched in MEDLINE, Embase, Cinahl, Scopus, PsycINFO, and Web of Science from inception. Eligibility was restricted to original qualitative studies. We performed a meta-synthesis by generating interpretative themes and a model of cancer-related FT. Thirty-two studies were included, encompassing 1080 individuals with BC. Of these studies, 17 were conducted in North America (719 individuals), nine in South, East, and West Asia (238 individuals), two in Oceania (53 individuals), and four in Northwest Africa (70 individuals). Five themes were identified: (i) the existential cost of cancer, (ii) the impact of insurance complexity, (iii) the need for timely and accessible information, (iv) seeking possible help, (v) negotiating daily life. The review highlights the lack of original qualitative studies conducted in Europe. Socioeconomic status, insurance, and employment amplify inequalities and shape the experience of FT. The interpretative model could support individuals with BC and providers’ communication.
癌症相关的财务毒性(FT)是与乳腺癌(BC)共存和超越的挑战。我们进行了一项系统综述和综合,报告了BC患者在癌症相关FT方面的经历。数据从一开始就在MEDLINE、Embase、Cinahl、Scopus、PsycINFO和Web of Science中进行了检索。资格仅限于原始的定性研究。我们通过产生解释性主题和癌症相关FT模型进行了荟萃综合。纳入了32项研究,包括1080名BC患者。在这些研究中,17个在北美(719个个体),9个在南亚、东亚和西亚(238个个体),2个在大洋洲(53个个体),4个在西北非洲(70个个体)。确定了五个主题:(i)癌症的生存成本,(ii)保险复杂性的影响,(iii)对及时和可获取信息的需求,(iv)寻求可能的帮助,(v)日常生活谈判。该综述强调了在欧洲进行的原始定性研究的缺乏。社会经济地位、保险和就业放大了不平等并塑造了金融服务的体验。解释性模型可以支持BC个体和提供者的沟通。
{"title":"“You're really walking along the razor's edge”: A meta-synthesis on the existential cost of breast cancer related to financial toxicity","authors":"Sara Paltrinieri , Margherita Schiavi , Barbara Bressi , Angela Contri , Martina Torreggiani , Laura Bernardi , Elisa Mazzini , Maria Chiara Bassi , Silvia di Leo , Luca Ghirotto , Stefania Costi","doi":"10.1016/j.breast.2026.104705","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.breast.2026.104705","url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Cancer-related financial toxicity (FT) is a challenge of living with and beyond breast cancer (BC). A systematic review and meta-synthesis was conducted to report the experience of individuals with BC regarding cancer-related FT. Data were searched in MEDLINE, Embase, Cinahl, Scopus, PsycINFO, and Web of Science from inception. Eligibility was restricted to original qualitative studies. We performed a meta-synthesis by generating interpretative themes and a model of cancer-related FT. Thirty-two studies were included, encompassing 1080 individuals with BC. Of these studies, 17 were conducted in North America (719 individuals), nine in South, East, and West Asia (238 individuals), two in Oceania (53 individuals), and four in Northwest Africa (70 individuals). Five themes were identified: (i) the existential cost of cancer, (ii) the impact of insurance complexity, (iii) the need for timely and accessible information, (iv) seeking possible help, (v) negotiating daily life. The review highlights the lack of original qualitative studies conducted in Europe. Socioeconomic status, insurance, and employment amplify inequalities and shape the experience of FT. The interpretative model could support individuals with BC and providers’ communication.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":9093,"journal":{"name":"Breast","volume":"86 ","pages":"Article 104705"},"PeriodicalIF":7.9,"publicationDate":"2026-01-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146037359","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}