首页 > 最新文献

Breast最新文献

英文 中文
The “lows”: Update on ER-low and HER2-low breast cancer "低":ER低和HER2低乳腺癌的最新情况
IF 5.7 2区 医学 Q1 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY Pub Date : 2024-10-29 DOI: 10.1016/j.breast.2024.103831
Nicola Fusco , Giuseppe Viale
ER-low and HER2-low breast cancers have emerged as clinically significant subtypes that challenge traditional diagnostic categories and treatment paradigms. These subtypes, representing a spectrum of disease, exhibit distinct biological behaviors, therapeutic responses, and prognostic outcomes. HER2-low breast cancer, defined by low HER2 protein expression (IHC score of 1+ or 2+ without HER2 gene amplification), has achieved clinical significance, particularly following the DESTINY-Breast trials, which demonstrated the efficacy of trastuzumab deruxtecan (T-DXd) in the population of patients with advanced HER2-low disease. Similarly, ER-low breast cancer, characterized by low estrogen receptor expression (in 1%–10 % invasive tumor cells), poses unique challenges due to its intermediate biological behavior and uncertain response to endocrine therapies. The identification of these subtypes is further complicated by inconsistencies in testing methodologies, which can lead to misclassification and impact treatment decisions. As our understanding of these subtypes improves, the need for standardized diagnostic approaches and individualized therapeutic decisions becomes increasingly urgent. Ongoing research and collaboration between pathologists and oncologists are essential for refining diagnostic criteria and improving outcomes for patients with breast cancers characterized by low expression of these theragnostic biomarkers. This review aims to consolidate current knowledge on HER2-low and ER-low breast cancers, focusing on the challenges associated with their identification, the implications for treatment, and future directions in clinical management. By examining recent studies and interlaboratory assessments, this review emphasizes the critical need for accurate and reproducible testing and reporting, and for the development of tailored therapeutic strategies for these “low” expression cancers.
ER 低和 HER2 低乳腺癌已成为具有重要临床意义的亚型,对传统诊断类别和治疗模式提出了挑战。这些亚型代表了一个疾病谱,表现出不同的生物学行为、治疗反应和预后结果。HER2 低乳腺癌的定义是 HER2 蛋白表达较低(IHC 评分为 1+ 或 2+,但无 HER2 基因扩增),它已取得了临床意义,尤其是在 DESTINY-Breast 试验之后,该试验证明了曲妥珠单抗德鲁司坦(T-DXd)在晚期 HER2 低乳腺癌患者中的疗效。同样,ER-低表达乳腺癌的特点是雌激素受体表达量低(占侵袭性肿瘤细胞的 1%-10%),由于其中间生物学行为和对内分泌疗法的不确定反应,也带来了独特的挑战。由于检测方法的不一致,这些亚型的鉴定变得更加复杂,可能导致分类错误并影响治疗决策。随着我们对这些亚型的认识不断加深,对标准化诊断方法和个体化治疗决策的需求日益迫切。病理学家和肿瘤学家之间的持续研究与合作对于完善诊断标准和改善以这些治疗生物标志物低表达为特征的乳腺癌患者的治疗效果至关重要。本综述旨在整合目前有关 HER2 低表达和 ER 低表达乳腺癌的知识,重点关注与识别这些乳腺癌相关的挑战、对治疗的影响以及临床管理的未来方向。通过研究近期的研究和实验室间的评估,本综述强调了准确、可重复的检测和报告,以及为这些 "低 "表达癌症量身定制治疗策略的迫切需要。
{"title":"The “lows”: Update on ER-low and HER2-low breast cancer","authors":"Nicola Fusco ,&nbsp;Giuseppe Viale","doi":"10.1016/j.breast.2024.103831","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.breast.2024.103831","url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>ER-low and HER2-low breast cancers have emerged as clinically significant subtypes that challenge traditional diagnostic categories and treatment paradigms. These subtypes, representing a spectrum of disease, exhibit distinct biological behaviors, therapeutic responses, and prognostic outcomes. HER2-low breast cancer, defined by low HER2 protein expression (IHC score of 1+ or 2+ without HER2 gene amplification), has achieved clinical significance, particularly following the DESTINY-Breast trials, which demonstrated the efficacy of trastuzumab deruxtecan (T-DXd) in the population of patients with advanced HER2-low disease. Similarly, ER-low breast cancer, characterized by low estrogen receptor expression (in 1%–10 % invasive tumor cells), poses unique challenges due to its intermediate biological behavior and uncertain response to endocrine therapies. The identification of these subtypes is further complicated by inconsistencies in testing methodologies, which can lead to misclassification and impact treatment decisions. As our understanding of these subtypes improves, the need for standardized diagnostic approaches and individualized therapeutic decisions becomes increasingly urgent. Ongoing research and collaboration between pathologists and oncologists are essential for refining diagnostic criteria and improving outcomes for patients with breast cancers characterized by low expression of these theragnostic biomarkers. This review aims to consolidate current knowledge on HER2-low and ER-low breast cancers, focusing on the challenges associated with their identification, the implications for treatment, and future directions in clinical management. By examining recent studies and interlaboratory assessments, this review emphasizes the critical need for accurate and reproducible testing and reporting, and for the development of tailored therapeutic strategies for these “low” expression cancers.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":9093,"journal":{"name":"Breast","volume":"78 ","pages":"Article 103831"},"PeriodicalIF":5.7,"publicationDate":"2024-10-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142560569","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Unveiling the future of breast cancer therapy: Cutting-edge antibody-drug conjugate strategies and clinical outcomes 揭示乳腺癌治疗的未来:最前沿的抗体药物结合策略和临床结果
IF 5.7 2区 医学 Q1 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY Pub Date : 2024-10-28 DOI: 10.1016/j.breast.2024.103830
Lu Sun , Xiaomeng Jia , Kainan Wang, Man Li
Breast cancer has become the most prevalent malignant tumor worldwide and remains one of the leading causes of cancer-related mortality among women globally. The prognosis for patients with metastatic breast cancer remains poor, necessitating the exploration of novel therapeutic strategies to improve survival rates. In the era of precision medicine, antibody-drug conjugates (ADCs) have gained significant attention as a targeted therapeutic strategy in breast cancer treatment. ADCs, a relatively new treatment for breast cancer, deliver cytotoxic drugs (payloads), directly into the tumor space, turning chemotherapy into a targeted agent, which enables patients to experience significant improvements with manageable drug toxicity. For the treatment of breast cancer, there are three ADCs approved for breast cancer treatment: Trastuzumab emtansine (T-DM1), Trastuzumab Deruxtecan (T-Dxd) targeting HER-2, and Sacituzumab Govitecan (SG) targeting Trop-2. Recent clinical studies have demonstrated that the benefits of ADC therapies extend beyond HER2-positive breast cancer toinclude hormone receptor (HR)-positive breast cancer, triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC), and HER2-low expressing breast cancer. Notably, the DESTINY-Breast series of studies, particularly focusing on T-Dxd, encompass neoadjuvant, adjuvant, and multiple lines of therapy for advanced breast cancer. This marks the advent of a comprehensive ADC era in breast cancer treatment. This review summarizes the efficacy and adverse effects of ADC therapies that have completed or are currently undergoing phase I-III clinical trials. Additionally, it analyzes potential combination strategies to overcome ADC resistance, aiming to provide clinicians with a comprehensive clinical guide to the use of ADCs in breast cancer treatment.
乳腺癌已成为全球发病率最高的恶性肿瘤,也是全球妇女因癌症死亡的主要原因之一。转移性乳腺癌患者的预后仍然很差,因此需要探索新的治疗策略来提高生存率。在精准医疗时代,抗体药物结合物(ADCs)作为乳腺癌治疗的一种靶向治疗策略备受关注。ADC 是一种相对较新的乳腺癌治疗方法,它能将细胞毒性药物(有效载荷)直接送入肿瘤空间,将化疗转化为靶向药物,从而使患者在药物毒性可控的情况下获得明显改善。在乳腺癌治疗方面,目前有三种 ADC 获准用于乳腺癌治疗:曲妥珠单抗埃坦新(T-DM1)、靶向 HER-2 的曲妥珠单抗德鲁司坦(T-Dxd)和靶向 Trop-2 的萨库珠单抗戈维替康(SG)。最近的临床研究表明,ADC疗法的益处不仅限于HER2阳性乳腺癌,还包括激素受体(HR)阳性乳腺癌、三阴性乳腺癌(TNBC)和HER2低表达乳腺癌。值得注意的是,DESTINY-Breast 系列研究,尤其以 T-Dxd 为重点,涵盖了晚期乳腺癌的新辅助治疗、辅助治疗和多线治疗。这标志着乳腺癌治疗全面 ADC 时代的到来。本综述总结了已完成或正在进行 I-III 期临床试验的 ADC 疗法的疗效和不良反应。此外,它还分析了克服 ADC 耐药性的潜在联合策略,旨在为临床医生提供一份关于在乳腺癌治疗中使用 ADC 的全面临床指南。
{"title":"Unveiling the future of breast cancer therapy: Cutting-edge antibody-drug conjugate strategies and clinical outcomes","authors":"Lu Sun ,&nbsp;Xiaomeng Jia ,&nbsp;Kainan Wang,&nbsp;Man Li","doi":"10.1016/j.breast.2024.103830","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.breast.2024.103830","url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Breast cancer has become the most prevalent malignant tumor worldwide and remains one of the leading causes of cancer-related mortality among women globally. The prognosis for patients with metastatic breast cancer remains poor, necessitating the exploration of novel therapeutic strategies to improve survival rates. In the era of precision medicine, antibody-drug conjugates (ADCs) have gained significant attention as a targeted therapeutic strategy in breast cancer treatment. ADCs, a relatively new treatment for breast cancer, deliver cytotoxic drugs (payloads), directly into the tumor space, turning chemotherapy into a targeted agent, which enables patients to experience significant improvements with manageable drug toxicity. For the treatment of breast cancer, there are three ADCs approved for breast cancer treatment: Trastuzumab emtansine (T-DM1), Trastuzumab Deruxtecan (T-Dxd) targeting HER-2, and Sacituzumab Govitecan (SG) targeting Trop-2. Recent clinical studies have demonstrated that the benefits of ADC therapies extend beyond HER2-positive breast cancer toinclude hormone receptor (HR)-positive breast cancer, triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC), and HER2-low expressing breast cancer. Notably, the DESTINY-Breast series of studies, particularly focusing on T-Dxd, encompass neoadjuvant, adjuvant, and multiple lines of therapy for advanced breast cancer. This marks the advent of a comprehensive ADC era in breast cancer treatment. This review summarizes the efficacy and adverse effects of ADC therapies that have completed or are currently undergoing phase I-III clinical trials. Additionally, it analyzes potential combination strategies to overcome ADC resistance, aiming to provide clinicians with a comprehensive clinical guide to the use of ADCs in breast cancer treatment.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":9093,"journal":{"name":"Breast","volume":"78 ","pages":"Article 103830"},"PeriodicalIF":5.7,"publicationDate":"2024-10-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142578516","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
The INFLUENCE 3.0 model: Updated predictions of locoregional recurrence and contralateral breast cancer, now also suitable for patients treated with neoadjuvant systemic therapy INFLUENCE 3.0 模型:对局部复发和对侧乳腺癌的最新预测,现在也适用于接受新辅助系统治疗的患者。
IF 5.7 2区 医学 Q1 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY Pub Date : 2024-10-28 DOI: 10.1016/j.breast.2024.103829
M.C. Van Maaren , T.A. Hueting , D.J.P. van Uden , M. van Hezewijk , L. de Munck , M.A.M. Mureau , P.A. Seegers , Q.J.M. Voorham , M.K. Schmidt , G.S. Sonke , C.G.M. Groothuis-Oudshoorn , S. Siesling , NABOR project group

Background

Individual risk prediction of 5-year locoregional recurrence (LRR) and contralateral breast cancer (CBC) supports decisions regarding personalised surveillance. The previously developed INFLUENCE tool was rebuild, including a recent population and patients who received neoadjuvant systemic therapy (NST).

Methods

Women, surgically treated for nonmetastatic breast cancer, diagnosed between 2012 and 2016, were selected from the Netherlands Cancer Registry. Cox regression with restricted cubic splines was compared to Random Survival Forest (RSF) to predict five-year LRR and CBC risks. Separate models were developed for NST patients. Discrimination and calibration were assessed by 100x bootstrap resampling.

Results

In the non-NST and NST group, 49,631 and 10,154 patients were included, respectively. Age, mode of detection, histology, sublocalisation, grade, pT, pN, hormonal receptor status ± endocrine treatment, HER2 status ± targeted treatment, surgery ± immediate reconstruction ± radiation therapy, and chemotherapy were significant predictors for LRR and/or CBC in non-NST patients. For NST patients this was similar, but excluding (y)pT and (y)pN status, and including presence of ductal carcinoma in situ, axillary lymph node dissection and pathologic complete response.
For non-NST patients, the Cox and RSF models were integrated in the online tool with 5-year AUCs of 0.77 (95%CI:0.77–0.77) and 0.68 (95%CI:0.67–0.68)] for LRR and CBC prediction, respectively. For NST patients, the RSF model performed best (AUCs 0.77 (95%CI:0.76–0.78) and 0.73 (95%CI:0.69–0.76) for LRR and CBC, respectively). Regarding calibration, observed-predicted differences were all <1 %.

Conclusion

This INFLUENCE 3.0 models showed moderate performance in LRR and CBC prediction. The models have been made available as online tool to enable clinical decision support regarding personalised follow-up.
背景:5年局部复发(LRR)和对侧乳腺癌(CBC)的个体风险预测有助于做出个性化监测的决策。对之前开发的 INFLUENCE 工具进行了重建,包括近期人群和接受新辅助系统治疗(NST)的患者:方法:从荷兰癌症登记处选取了2012年至2016年期间确诊为非转移性乳腺癌并接受过手术治疗的女性患者。在预测五年 LRR 和 CBC 风险时,将使用受限立方样条的 Cox 回归与随机生存森林 (RSF) 进行了比较。为 NST 患者开发了单独的模型。通过 100 倍引导重采样评估了辨别度和校准度:在非 NST 组和 NST 组中,分别纳入了 49,631 名和 10,154 名患者。在非 NST 患者中,年龄、检测方式、组织学、亚定位、分级、pT、pN、激素受体状态(内分泌治疗)、HER2 状态(靶向治疗)、手术(即刻重建)、放疗和化疗是 LRR 和/或 CBC 的重要预测因素。对于 NST 患者,情况类似,但不包括 (y)pT 和 (y)pN 状态,还包括是否存在导管原位癌、腋窝淋巴结清扫和病理完全反应。对于非 NST 患者,在线工具中整合了 Cox 和 RSF 模型,对 LRR 和 CBC 预测的 5 年 AUC 分别为 0.77(95%CI:0.77-0.77)和 0.68(95%CI:0.67-0.68)]。对于 NST 患者,RSF 模型表现最佳(LRR 和 CBC 的 AUC 分别为 0.77(95%CI:0.76-0.78)和 0.73(95%CI:0.69-0.76))。在校准方面,观测值与预测值之间的差异均为结论:INFLUENCE 3.0 模型在 LRR 和 CBC 预测方面表现中规中矩。该模型已作为在线工具提供,以便为个性化随访提供临床决策支持。
{"title":"The INFLUENCE 3.0 model: Updated predictions of locoregional recurrence and contralateral breast cancer, now also suitable for patients treated with neoadjuvant systemic therapy","authors":"M.C. Van Maaren ,&nbsp;T.A. Hueting ,&nbsp;D.J.P. van Uden ,&nbsp;M. van Hezewijk ,&nbsp;L. de Munck ,&nbsp;M.A.M. Mureau ,&nbsp;P.A. Seegers ,&nbsp;Q.J.M. Voorham ,&nbsp;M.K. Schmidt ,&nbsp;G.S. Sonke ,&nbsp;C.G.M. Groothuis-Oudshoorn ,&nbsp;S. Siesling ,&nbsp;NABOR project group","doi":"10.1016/j.breast.2024.103829","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.breast.2024.103829","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Individual risk prediction of 5-year locoregional recurrence (LRR) and contralateral breast cancer (CBC) supports decisions regarding personalised surveillance. The previously developed INFLUENCE tool was rebuild, including a recent population and patients who received neoadjuvant systemic therapy (NST).</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Women, surgically treated for nonmetastatic breast cancer, diagnosed between 2012 and 2016, were selected from the Netherlands Cancer Registry. Cox regression with restricted cubic splines was compared to Random Survival Forest (RSF) to predict five-year LRR and CBC risks. Separate models were developed for NST patients. Discrimination and calibration were assessed by 100x bootstrap resampling.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>In the non-NST and NST group, 49,631 and 10,154 patients were included, respectively. Age, mode of detection, histology, sublocalisation, grade, pT, pN, hormonal receptor status ± endocrine treatment, HER2 status ± targeted treatment, surgery ± immediate reconstruction ± radiation therapy, and chemotherapy were significant predictors for LRR and/or CBC in non-NST patients. For NST patients this was similar, but excluding (y)pT and (y)pN status, and including presence of ductal carcinoma in situ, axillary lymph node dissection and pathologic complete response.</div><div>For non-NST patients, the Cox and RSF models were integrated in the online tool with 5-year AUCs of 0.77 (95%CI:0.77–0.77) and 0.68 (95%CI:0.67–0.68)] for LRR and CBC prediction, respectively. For NST patients, the RSF model performed best (AUCs 0.77 (95%CI:0.76–0.78) and 0.73 (95%CI:0.69–0.76) for LRR and CBC, respectively). Regarding calibration, observed-predicted differences were all &lt;1 %.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>This INFLUENCE 3.0 models showed moderate performance in LRR and CBC prediction. The models have been made available as online tool to enable clinical decision support regarding personalised follow-up.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":9093,"journal":{"name":"Breast","volume":"79 ","pages":"Article 103829"},"PeriodicalIF":5.7,"publicationDate":"2024-10-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142614220","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
The incidence of male breast cancer in Klinefelter Syndrome and its proposed mechanisms Klinefelter 综合征中男性乳腺癌的发病率及其拟议机制。
IF 5.7 2区 医学 Q1 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY Pub Date : 2024-10-24 DOI: 10.1016/j.breast.2024.103827
Benjamin Cook , Sasha Nayar , Simon Filson , Tet Yap

Introduction

Men with Klinefelter Syndrome (KS) have been previously reported to have an increased risk of Male Breast Cancer (MBC). This systematic review provides the latest information regarding the incidence of MBC in the KS population compared to the standard male population and identifies mechanisms by which MBC may develop in KS.

Material and methods

Several databases were searched including PubMed/MEDLINE and EMBASE between October 2023 and March 2024. The review was conducted in accordance with the latest Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses-guidelines and was registered in PROSPERO (CRD42024551110). Overall, 332 papers were identified for screening. Standardised incidence ratios (SIRs) were calculated in comparison to national incidence figures. Additionally, a literature review was conducted looking at potential MBC mechanisms in KS.

Results

Across Danish and British cohorts, incidence of MBC in KS was significantly higher than the general population: SIR 18.1 (95 % CI: 13.53 to 24.74), p<0.001. Breast cancer rates in women are still far higher (68.50 per 100,000 woman-years). MBC mechanism in KS may involve decreased micro-RNA (MIR-3648 and MIR3647) expression, increased oestrogen/progesterone receptor expression and exogenous androgen use.

Conclusions

Rates of MBC are significantly raised in KS and a higher clinical suspicion of breast cancer should be considered when assessing men with KS. The true aetiology of MBC in KS, however, requires further research. There is a need for an accurate and up to date study of MBC incidence in KS to define the current risk.
导言:以前曾有报道称,患有克莱菲尔特综合征(KS)的男性罹患男性乳腺癌(MBC)的风险增加。本系统综述提供了有关 KS 患者与标准男性患者相比 MBC 发病率的最新信息,并确定了 KS 患者 MBC 的发病机制:在 2023 年 10 月至 2024 年 3 月期间检索了多个数据库,包括 PubMed/MEDLINE 和 EMBASE。该综述根据最新的《系统综述和荟萃分析首选报告项目》指南进行,并在 PROSPERO(CRD42024551110)上进行了注册。共筛选出 332 篇论文。通过与全国发病率数字进行比较,计算出了标准化发病率比(SIR)。此外,还对 KS 中潜在的 MBC 机制进行了文献综述:在丹麦和英国的队列中,KS的MBC发病率明显高于普通人群:SIR 18.1 (95 % CI: 13.53 to 24.74),p结论:在 KS 中,乳腺增生症的发病率明显升高,在评估患有 KS 的男性时,临床上应更多地怀疑其患有乳腺癌。然而,KS 中 MBC 的真正病因还需要进一步研究。有必要对 KS 中的 MBC 发病率进行准确的最新研究,以确定当前的风险。
{"title":"The incidence of male breast cancer in Klinefelter Syndrome and its proposed mechanisms","authors":"Benjamin Cook ,&nbsp;Sasha Nayar ,&nbsp;Simon Filson ,&nbsp;Tet Yap","doi":"10.1016/j.breast.2024.103827","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.breast.2024.103827","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><div>Men with Klinefelter Syndrome (KS) have been previously reported to have an increased risk of Male Breast Cancer (MBC). This systematic review provides the latest information regarding the incidence of MBC in the KS population compared to the standard male population and identifies mechanisms by which MBC may develop in KS.</div></div><div><h3>Material and methods</h3><div>Several databases were searched including PubMed/MEDLINE and EMBASE between October 2023 and March 2024. The review was conducted in accordance with the latest Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses-guidelines and was registered in PROSPERO (CRD42024551110). Overall, 332 papers were identified for screening. Standardised incidence ratios (SIRs) were calculated in comparison to national incidence figures. Additionally, a literature review was conducted looking at potential MBC mechanisms in KS.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Across Danish and British cohorts, incidence of MBC in KS was significantly higher than the general population: SIR 18.1 (95 % CI: 13.53 to 24.74), <em>p</em>&lt;<em>0.001</em>. Breast cancer rates in women are still far higher (68.50 per 100,000 woman-years). MBC mechanism in KS may involve decreased micro-RNA (MIR-3648 and MIR3647) expression, increased oestrogen/progesterone receptor expression and exogenous androgen use.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Rates of MBC are significantly raised in KS and a higher clinical suspicion of breast cancer should be considered when assessing men with KS. The true aetiology of MBC in KS, however, requires further research. There is a need for an accurate and up to date study of MBC incidence in KS to define the current risk.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":9093,"journal":{"name":"Breast","volume":"78 ","pages":"Article 103827"},"PeriodicalIF":5.7,"publicationDate":"2024-10-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142521020","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Adjuvant denosumab for early breast cancer–Evidence and controversy 辅助治疗早期乳腺癌的地诺单抗--证据与争议。
IF 5.7 2区 医学 Q1 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY Pub Date : 2024-10-23 DOI: 10.1016/j.breast.2024.103826
Laura Moretti , Laura Richelmi , Deborah Cosentini, Rebecca Pedersini, Salvatore Grisanti, Vito Amoroso, Alfredo Berruti, Marta Laganà
The efficacy of adjuvant denosumab in combination with hormonotherapy in breast cancer patients was investigated in two randomized trials, ABCSG-18 and D-Care, but the results were mixed with respect to the impact of this drug on disease-free survival. However, the ABCSG-18 study has achieved its primary goal: prevention of clinical fractures. Therefore, the protective role of Denosumab on bone fragility induced by estrogen deprivation, already demonstrated in post-menopausal women, has been validated in the breast cancer setting.
ABCSG-18和D-Care两项随机试验研究了地诺单抗联合激素疗法对乳腺癌患者辅助治疗的疗效,但该药物对无病生存期的影响结果不一。不过,ABCSG-18 研究实现了其主要目标:预防临床骨折。因此,地诺单抗对雌激素缺乏引起的骨脆性的保护作用已在绝经后妇女中得到证实,在乳腺癌患者中也得到了验证。
{"title":"Adjuvant denosumab for early breast cancer–Evidence and controversy","authors":"Laura Moretti ,&nbsp;Laura Richelmi ,&nbsp;Deborah Cosentini,&nbsp;Rebecca Pedersini,&nbsp;Salvatore Grisanti,&nbsp;Vito Amoroso,&nbsp;Alfredo Berruti,&nbsp;Marta Laganà","doi":"10.1016/j.breast.2024.103826","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.breast.2024.103826","url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The efficacy of adjuvant denosumab in combination with hormonotherapy in breast cancer patients was investigated in two randomized trials, ABCSG-18 and D-Care, but the results were mixed with respect to the impact of this drug on disease-free survival. However, the ABCSG-18 study has achieved its primary goal: prevention of clinical fractures. Therefore, the protective role of Denosumab on bone fragility induced by estrogen deprivation, already demonstrated in post-menopausal women, has been validated in the breast cancer setting.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":9093,"journal":{"name":"Breast","volume":"78 ","pages":"Article 103826"},"PeriodicalIF":5.7,"publicationDate":"2024-10-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142603133","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Neoadjuvant chemotherapy for radiation associated angiosarcoma (RAAS) of the breast: A retrospective single center study 乳腺放射相关血管肉瘤(RAAS)的新辅助化疗:单中心回顾性研究。
IF 5.7 2区 医学 Q1 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY Pub Date : 2024-10-21 DOI: 10.1016/j.breast.2024.103825
Stijn J.C. van der Burg , Sophie J.M. Reijers , Anke Kuijpers , Lotte Heimans , Astrid N. Scholten , Rick L.M. Haas , Hester van Boven , Willemijn M. Kolff , Marie-Jeanne T.F.D. Vrancken Peeters , Martijn Kerst , Beatrijs A. Seinstra , Neeltje Steeghs , Winette T.A. van der Graaf , Yvonne M. Schrage , Winan J. van Houdt

Background

Radiation associated angiosarcoma (RAAS) of the breast is a rare malignancy with poor survival. Optimal treatment strategies remain uncertain due to a lack of data, and vary between surgery alone and a combination of surgery with (neo)adjuvant chemotherapy (NACT) and/or re-irradiation. The aim of this study was to evaluate the potential benefit of taxane based NACT.

Methods

In this retrospective single center study, all patients with RAAS of the breast treated between 1994 and 2024 are included. Since 2018, NACT is considered a treatment option for this patient population in our institute. The difference in oncological outcomes of patients with and without NACT were compared.

Results

Thirty-five women were included. Thirteen (37 %) received NACT of which five (39 %) also had neoadjuvant re-irradiation with hyperthermia. Eleven patients (85 %) received paclitaxel, the other two (15 %) had doxorubicine/docetaxel. Complete pathological response was found in 69 % (n = 9). Median follow up was 41 months (range 24–56) for patients with NACT and 44 (range 20–108) for patients without NACT. In the NACT group, only one patient developed a recurrence after 6.5 years. Patients with NACT had improved oncological outcomes compared to patients without NACT in terms of 3-year local recurrence free survival (100% vs. 63.9 %, p = 0.14), distant metastasis free survival (100 % vs. 47.5 %, p = 0.005), and overall survival (100% vs. 56.1 %, p = 0.016).

Conclusion

In this study, neoadjuvant taxanes for RAAS of the breast leads to improved distant metastasis free survival and overal survival in patients treated with NACT compared to no NACT
背景:乳腺放射相关血管肉瘤(RAAS)是一种罕见的恶性肿瘤,存活率很低。由于缺乏数据,最佳治疗策略仍不确定,包括单纯手术和手术与(新)辅助化疗(NACT)和/或再放疗相结合。本研究旨在评估以紫杉类药物为基础的新辅助化疗(NACT)的潜在益处:在这项回顾性单中心研究中,纳入了 1994 年至 2024 年间接受治疗的所有乳腺 RAAS 患者。自2018年起,我院将NACT视为该患者群体的治疗选择。研究比较了接受和未接受NACT治疗患者的肿瘤预后差异:结果:共纳入 35 名女性患者。13名患者(37%)接受了NACT治疗,其中5名患者(39%)还接受了新辅助热疗再放疗。11名患者(85%)接受了紫杉醇治疗,另外2名患者(15%)接受了多柔比星/多西他赛治疗。病理完全反应率为 69%(9 例)。NACT 组患者的中位随访时间为 41 个月(24-56 个月),非 NACT 组患者的中位随访时间为 44 个月(20-108 个月)。在 NACT 组中,只有一名患者在 6.5 年后复发。在3年无局部复发生存率(100% vs. 63.9%,p = 0.14)、无远处转移生存率(100% vs. 47.5%,p = 0.005)和总生存率(100% vs. 56.1%,p = 0.016)方面,接受NACT治疗的患者比未接受NACT治疗的患者的肿瘤治疗效果更好:结论:在这项研究中,新辅助他汀类药物治疗乳腺 RAAS 可改善 NACT 治疗患者的无远处转移生存率和总生存率。
{"title":"Neoadjuvant chemotherapy for radiation associated angiosarcoma (RAAS) of the breast: A retrospective single center study","authors":"Stijn J.C. van der Burg ,&nbsp;Sophie J.M. Reijers ,&nbsp;Anke Kuijpers ,&nbsp;Lotte Heimans ,&nbsp;Astrid N. Scholten ,&nbsp;Rick L.M. Haas ,&nbsp;Hester van Boven ,&nbsp;Willemijn M. Kolff ,&nbsp;Marie-Jeanne T.F.D. Vrancken Peeters ,&nbsp;Martijn Kerst ,&nbsp;Beatrijs A. Seinstra ,&nbsp;Neeltje Steeghs ,&nbsp;Winette T.A. van der Graaf ,&nbsp;Yvonne M. Schrage ,&nbsp;Winan J. van Houdt","doi":"10.1016/j.breast.2024.103825","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.breast.2024.103825","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Radiation associated angiosarcoma (RAAS) of the breast is a rare malignancy with poor survival. Optimal treatment strategies remain uncertain due to a lack of data, and vary between surgery alone and a combination of surgery with (neo)adjuvant chemotherapy (NACT) and/or re-irradiation. The aim of this study was to evaluate the potential benefit of taxane based NACT.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>In this retrospective single center study, all patients with RAAS of the breast treated between 1994 and 2024 are included. Since 2018, NACT is considered a treatment option for this patient population in our institute. The difference in oncological outcomes of patients with and without NACT were compared.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Thirty-five women were included. Thirteen (37 %) received NACT of which five (39 %) also had neoadjuvant re-irradiation with hyperthermia. Eleven patients (85 %) received paclitaxel, the other two (15 %) had doxorubicine/docetaxel. Complete pathological response was found in 69 % (n = 9). Median follow up was 41 months (range 24–56) for patients with NACT and 44 (range 20–108) for patients without NACT. In the NACT group, only one patient developed a recurrence after 6.5 years. Patients with NACT had improved oncological outcomes compared to patients without NACT in terms of 3-year local recurrence free survival (100% vs. 63.9 %, p = 0.14), distant metastasis free survival (100 % vs. 47.5 %, p = 0.005), and overall survival (100% vs. 56.1 %, p = 0.016).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>In this study, neoadjuvant taxanes for RAAS of the breast leads to improved distant metastasis free survival and overal survival in patients treated with NACT compared to no NACT</div></div>","PeriodicalId":9093,"journal":{"name":"Breast","volume":"78 ","pages":"Article 103825"},"PeriodicalIF":5.7,"publicationDate":"2024-10-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142543578","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Radiotherapy and increased risk of second primary cancers in breast cancer survivors: An epidemiological and large cohort study 放疗与乳腺癌幸存者罹患第二原发性癌症风险的增加:一项流行病学大型队列研究。
IF 5.7 2区 医学 Q1 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY Pub Date : 2024-10-19 DOI: 10.1016/j.breast.2024.103824
Niuniu Hou , Zhe Wang , Yuwei Ling , Guangdong Hou , Bo Zhang , Xue Zhang , Mei Shi , Zhuling Chu , Yaoling Wang , Jun Hu , Chong Chen , Rui Ling

Background

Radiotherapy (RT) for breast cancer (BC) may raise the risk of second primary cancers (SPCs), a relationship inadequately studied.

Methods

We analyzed 248268 female BC patients from 9 SEER registries, 1988–2018, identifying SPCs >5 years after initial treatment, comparing SPC risks between RT and non-RT cohorts using Fine-Gray and Poisson regressions.

Results

Of all participants, 55.4 % received surgery and RT. The RT group had a higher SPC incidence, with excess incidence significantly dropped from 6.9 % in 1990 to 0.2 % in 2012. The 30-year SPC incidence was 24.69 % in the RT cohort and 18.11 % in the NRT cohort. RT increased the risk of SPCs(HR, 1.29 [95%CI,1.26–1.33]; P < 0.001), BC(HR, 1.58[1.52–1.64]; P < 0.001), cancer of respiratory system(HR, 1.21[1.13–1.30]; P = 0.013), skin cancer(HR, 1.26[1.10–1.44]; P < 0.001), leukemia(HR, 1.30[1.11–1.54]; P = 0.001), soft tissue cancer(HR, 1.78[1.34–2.37]; P < 0.001), and eye & orbit cancer(HR, 2.21[1.02–4.80]; P = 0.044), except for reducing the risk of multiple myeloma (HR 0.76). Notably, RT-related risks(RR) for BC declined with increasing age and the year of BC diagnosed, increased with longer latency, but the dynamic RR for cancer of respiratory system presented the almost opposite trends. The RT cohort had higher standardized incidence ratios for SPCs compared to both the NRT cohort and the general population overall. Although 15-year overall survival for SPCs was similar between RT and NRT cohorts, SPC presence significantly lowered 30-year survival from 35.64 % to 23.90 %.

Conclusions

RT might increase susceptibility to SPC in breast, respiratory system, skin, soft tissue, eye and orbit, and leukemia in BC survivors. Efforts should be made to timely diagnose SPCs based on their specific patterns to improve patient's quality of life.
背景:乳腺癌(BC)放疗(RT)可能会增加罹患第二原发性癌症(SPC)的风险,但对两者之间的关系研究不足:我们分析了1988-2018年9个SEER登记处的248268名女性BC患者,确定了初次治疗后5年以上的SPC,并使用Fine-Gray和泊松回归比较了RT和非RT队列的SPC风险:在所有参与者中,55.4%接受了手术和RT治疗。RT组的SPC发生率较高,超额发生率从1990年的6.9%显著下降到2012年的0.2%。RT组的30年SPC发病率为24.69%,NRT组为18.11%。RT 增加了 SPC 的风险(HR,1.29 [95%CI,1.26-1.33];P 结论:RT可能会增加BC幸存者乳腺、呼吸系统、皮肤、软组织、眼眶和白血病的SPC易感性。应努力根据 SPC 的具体模式及时诊断 SPC,以提高患者的生活质量。
{"title":"Radiotherapy and increased risk of second primary cancers in breast cancer survivors: An epidemiological and large cohort study","authors":"Niuniu Hou ,&nbsp;Zhe Wang ,&nbsp;Yuwei Ling ,&nbsp;Guangdong Hou ,&nbsp;Bo Zhang ,&nbsp;Xue Zhang ,&nbsp;Mei Shi ,&nbsp;Zhuling Chu ,&nbsp;Yaoling Wang ,&nbsp;Jun Hu ,&nbsp;Chong Chen ,&nbsp;Rui Ling","doi":"10.1016/j.breast.2024.103824","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.breast.2024.103824","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Radiotherapy (RT) for breast cancer (BC) may raise the risk of second primary cancers (SPCs), a relationship inadequately studied.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>We analyzed 248268 female BC patients from 9 SEER registries, 1988–2018, identifying SPCs &gt;5 years after initial treatment, comparing SPC risks between RT and non-RT cohorts using Fine-Gray and Poisson regressions.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Of all participants, 55.4 % received surgery and RT. The RT group had a higher SPC incidence, with excess incidence significantly dropped from 6.9 % in 1990 to 0.2 % in 2012. The 30-year SPC incidence was 24.69 % in the RT cohort and 18.11 % in the NRT cohort. RT increased the risk of SPCs(HR, 1.29 [95%CI,1.26–1.33]; P &lt; 0.001), BC(HR, 1.58[1.52–1.64]; P &lt; 0.001), cancer of respiratory system(HR, 1.21[1.13–1.30]; P = 0.013), skin cancer(HR, 1.26[1.10–1.44]; P &lt; 0.001), leukemia(HR, 1.30[1.11–1.54]; P = 0.001), soft tissue cancer(HR, 1.78[1.34–2.37]; P &lt; 0.001), and eye &amp; orbit cancer(HR, 2.21[1.02–4.80]; P = 0.044), except for reducing the risk of multiple myeloma (HR 0.76). Notably, RT-related risks(RR) for BC declined with increasing age and the year of BC diagnosed, increased with longer latency, but the dynamic RR for cancer of respiratory system presented the almost opposite trends. The RT cohort had higher standardized incidence ratios for SPCs compared to both the NRT cohort and the general population overall. Although 15-year overall survival for SPCs was similar between RT and NRT cohorts, SPC presence significantly lowered 30-year survival from 35.64 % to 23.90 %.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>RT might increase susceptibility to SPC in breast, respiratory system, skin, soft tissue, eye and orbit, and leukemia in BC survivors. Efforts should be made to timely diagnose SPCs based on their specific patterns to improve patient's quality of life.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":9093,"journal":{"name":"Breast","volume":"78 ","pages":"Article 103824"},"PeriodicalIF":5.7,"publicationDate":"2024-10-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142494877","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Did Michelangelo paint a young adult woman with breast cancer in “The Flood” (Sistine Chapel, Rome)? 米开朗基罗是否在 "洪水"(罗马西斯廷教堂)中描绘了一位患有乳腺癌的年轻成年女性?
IF 5.7 2区 医学 Q1 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY Pub Date : 2024-10-19 DOI: 10.1016/j.breast.2024.103823
Andreas G. Nerlich , Johann C. Dewaal , Antonio Perciaccante , Laura Cortesi , Serena Di Cosimo , Judith Wimmer , Simon T. Donell , Raffaella Bianucci
The Flood is the first pictorial scene that Michelangelo Buonarroti painted on the ceiling of the Sistine Chapel in the Vatican. On the right side of the fresco a woman with abnormal breast morphology is presented and the nature of her disease is considered using the Guidelines for Iconodiagnosis. A team of experts covering art history, art expertise, medicine, genetics, and pathology undertook the process and concluded that the pathology shown is probably breast cancer, most likely linked to the symbolic significance of an inevitable death as expressed in the Book of Genesis.
洪水》是米开朗基罗-布纳罗蒂在梵蒂冈西斯廷教堂天花板上绘制的第一幅画。壁画右侧展示了一位乳房形态异常的女性,并根据《图像诊断指南》对其疾病性质进行了研究。一个由艺术史、艺术专业知识、医学、遗传学和病理学专家组成的小组进行了研究,并得出结论认为,壁画中的病变很可能是乳腺癌,这很可能与《创世纪》中表达的不可避免的死亡的象征意义有关。
{"title":"Did Michelangelo paint a young adult woman with breast cancer in “The Flood” (Sistine Chapel, Rome)?","authors":"Andreas G. Nerlich ,&nbsp;Johann C. Dewaal ,&nbsp;Antonio Perciaccante ,&nbsp;Laura Cortesi ,&nbsp;Serena Di Cosimo ,&nbsp;Judith Wimmer ,&nbsp;Simon T. Donell ,&nbsp;Raffaella Bianucci","doi":"10.1016/j.breast.2024.103823","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.breast.2024.103823","url":null,"abstract":"<div><div><em>The Flood</em> is the first pictorial scene that Michelangelo Buonarroti painted on the ceiling of the Sistine Chapel in the Vatican. On the right side of the fresco a woman with abnormal breast morphology is presented and the nature of her disease is considered using the Guidelines for Iconodiagnosis. A team of experts covering art history, art expertise, medicine, genetics, and pathology undertook the process and concluded that the pathology shown is probably breast cancer, most likely linked to the symbolic significance of an inevitable death as expressed in the Book of Genesis.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":9093,"journal":{"name":"Breast","volume":"78 ","pages":"Article 103823"},"PeriodicalIF":5.7,"publicationDate":"2024-10-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142533644","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Nodal involvement in patients with small, clinically node-negative HER2-positive breast cancer after staging with FDG-PET/CT and neoadjuvant systemic therapy 临床结节阴性 HER2 阳性小乳腺癌患者在使用 FDG-PET/CT 和新辅助系统疗法分期后的结节受累情况。
IF 5.7 2区 医学 Q1 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY Pub Date : 2024-10-18 DOI: 10.1016/j.breast.2024.103822
Josefien P. van Olmen , Veerle CM. Geurts , Marie-Jeanne TFD. Vrancken Peeters , Caroline A. Drukker , Marcel PM. Stokkel , Marleen Kok , Frederieke H. van Duijnhoven

Background

Guidelines recommend systemic therapy for stage I HER2+ breast cancer (BC). Neoadjuvant systemic treatment (NAST) allows response-guided adjuvant treatment. However, prior to NAST only clinical nodal staging is available, risking undertreatment if ypN+ is observed. Here, we aim to evaluate the impact of FDG-PET/CT and NAST on nodal disease status in patients with small, node-negative HER2+ BC.

Methods

This retrospective study included patients with small (≤3 cm), clinically node-negative HER2+ BC diagnosed between 2011 and 2023. Primary outcome was the proportion of patients with nodal disease on final pathology after upfront surgery or NAST followed by surgery with or without FDG-PET/CT. Patients received either paclitaxel + trastuzumab (PT) or a more extensive regimen.

Results

Of the 370 included patients, 183 underwent FDG-PET/CT, detecting regional or distant metastases in 14 patients (7.7 %).
Among 356 patients with cN0 disease, 44.1 % (n = 157/356) had upfront surgery, with only 3 % (5/157) having an FDG-PET/CT. The remaining 55.9 % (199/356) started with NAST, with 82 % (n = 164/199) having an FDG-PET/CT. Among patients treated with NAST, 36 % received PT.
Nodal involvement on pathology was seen in 19.1 % (n = 29/152) after upfront surgery without FDG-PET/CT and 6.1 % (10/164) after NAST combined with FDG-PET/CT.
After NAST, 58 % had a pCR (PT: 49 %, other: 63 %). Nodal involvement on final pathology was seen in 6.9 % after PT and in 5.5 % after more extensive regimen.

Conclusions

The proportion of patients with ypN + after NAST combined with FDG-PET/CT was only 6.1 %. Neoadjuvant treatment can be a safe treatment strategy for patients with stage I HER2+ BC.
背景:指南建议对I期HER2+乳腺癌(BC)进行全身治疗。新辅助系统性治疗(NAST)允许在反应指导下进行辅助治疗。然而,在进行新辅助全身治疗之前,只能进行临床结节分期,如果观察到ypN+,就有可能导致治疗不足。在此,我们旨在评估FDG-PET/CT和NAST对HER2+ BC小结节阴性患者结节疾病状态的影响:这项回顾性研究纳入了2011年至2023年期间确诊的小结节(≤3厘米)、临床结节阴性HER2+ BC患者。主要研究结果是患者在接受前期手术或NAST后接受手术并进行或不进行FDG-PET/CT检查后,最终病理结果出现结节性疾病的比例。患者接受紫杉醇+曲妥珠单抗(PT)或更广泛的治疗方案:在纳入的370名患者中,183人接受了FDG-PET/CT检查,其中14人(7.7%)发现了区域或远处转移。在356名cN0患者中,44.1%(n = 157/356)接受了前期手术,只有3%(5/157)接受了FDG-PET/CT检查。其余55.9%的患者(199/356)开始接受NAST治疗,其中82%(n = 164/199)接受了FDG-PET/CT检查。在接受 NAST 治疗的患者中,36% 接受了 PT 治疗。在未进行 FDG-PET/CT 的前期手术后,19.1% 的患者(n = 29/152)在病理检查中发现结节受累,而在接受 NAST 联合 FDG-PET/CT 治疗后,6.1% 的患者(10/164)在病理检查中发现结节受累。NAST术后,58%的患者获得了pCR(PT:49%,其他:63%)。经过PT治疗后,最终病理结果显示结节受累的比例为6.9%,经过更广泛治疗后,结节受累的比例为5.5%:结论:NAST联合FDG-PET/CT治疗后,ypN+患者的比例仅为6.1%。对于HER2+ BC I期患者来说,新辅助治疗是一种安全的治疗策略。
{"title":"Nodal involvement in patients with small, clinically node-negative HER2-positive breast cancer after staging with FDG-PET/CT and neoadjuvant systemic therapy","authors":"Josefien P. van Olmen ,&nbsp;Veerle CM. Geurts ,&nbsp;Marie-Jeanne TFD. Vrancken Peeters ,&nbsp;Caroline A. Drukker ,&nbsp;Marcel PM. Stokkel ,&nbsp;Marleen Kok ,&nbsp;Frederieke H. van Duijnhoven","doi":"10.1016/j.breast.2024.103822","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.breast.2024.103822","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Guidelines recommend systemic therapy for stage I HER2+ breast cancer (BC). Neoadjuvant systemic treatment (NAST) allows response-guided adjuvant treatment. However, prior to NAST only clinical nodal staging is available, risking undertreatment if ypN+ is observed. Here, we aim to evaluate the impact of FDG-PET/CT and NAST on nodal disease status in patients with small, node-negative HER2+ BC.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>This retrospective study included patients with small (≤3 cm), clinically node-negative HER2+ BC diagnosed between 2011 and 2023. Primary outcome was the proportion of patients with nodal disease on final pathology after upfront surgery or NAST followed by surgery with or without FDG-PET/CT. Patients received either paclitaxel + trastuzumab (PT) or a more extensive regimen.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Of the 370 included patients, 183 underwent FDG-PET/CT, detecting regional or distant metastases in 14 patients (7.7 %).</div><div>Among 356 patients with cN0 disease, 44.1 % (n = 157/356) had upfront surgery, with only 3 % (5/157) having an FDG-PET/CT. The remaining 55.9 % (199/356) started with NAST, with 82 % (n = 164/199) having an FDG-PET/CT. Among patients treated with NAST, 36 % received PT.</div><div>Nodal involvement on pathology was seen in 19.1 % (n = 29/152) after upfront surgery without FDG-PET/CT and 6.1 % (10/164) after NAST combined with FDG-PET/CT.</div><div>After NAST, 58 % had a pCR (PT: 49 %, other: 63 %). Nodal involvement on final pathology was seen in 6.9 % after PT and in 5.5 % after more extensive regimen.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>The proportion of patients with ypN + after NAST combined with FDG-PET/CT was only 6.1 %. Neoadjuvant treatment can be a safe treatment strategy for patients with stage I HER2+ BC.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":9093,"journal":{"name":"Breast","volume":"78 ","pages":"Article 103822"},"PeriodicalIF":5.7,"publicationDate":"2024-10-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142494968","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
The efficacy and safety of CDK4/6 inhibitors combined with endocrine therapy versus endocrine therapy alone in the adjuvant treatment of patients with high-risk invasive HR+/HER2-early breast cancer: A comprehensive updated meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials CDK4/6抑制剂联合内分泌治疗与单纯内分泌治疗在高危浸润性HR+/HER2早期乳腺癌患者辅助治疗中的疗效和安全性对比:随机临床试验的全面更新荟萃分析
IF 5.7 2区 医学 Q1 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY Pub Date : 2024-10-15 DOI: 10.1016/j.breast.2024.103815
Merve Keskinkilic , Mehmet Emin Arayici , Yasemin Basbinar , Hulya Ellidokuz , Tugba Yavuzsen , Ilhan Oztop

Background

This paper aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of incorporating CDK 4/6 inhibitors (CDK4/6i) into ET for the adjuvant treatment of HR + HER2-resected early-stage breast cancer (ESBC) patients, employing meta-analysis.

Methods

In this paper, we compiled randomized clinical trials focusing on CDK4/6i used in the adjuvant treatment of high-risk invasive HR-positive and HER2-ESBC patients. A meta-analysis was performed in line with the PRISMA guidelines.

Results

We identified four clinical trials that met our inclusion criteria and were published between 2020 and 2024. These trials involved a combined sample size of 17,749 patients diagnosed with breast cancer. The data obtained from the pooled analysis revealed a remarkable beneficial trend in terms of invasive disease-free survival (iDFS) for the use of ET in combination with CDK4/6i compared to the group receiving ET alone (HR = 0.81, 95 % CI: 0.67–0.98, p = 0.03). Of note, CDK4/6 inhibitors demonstrated a notably beneficial effect in both grade 2 (HR = 0.69, 95 % CI: 0.59–0.81, p < 0.001) and grade 3 (HR = 0.76, 95 % CI: 0.65–0.89, p < 0.001). Significant improvements were noted in terms of distant relapse-free survival (dRFS) in the groups treated with abemaciclib and ribociclib (HR = 0.65, 95 % CI: 0.56–0.76, p < 0.001; HR = 0.72, 95 % CI: 0.58–0.89, p = 0.003, respectively). CDK4/6i didn't yield a statistically significant difference in overall survival (OS) (HR = 0.96, 95 % CI: 0.77–1.19, p = 0.69). The use of CDK4/6i with ET was associated with an increased risk of adverse events, particularly anemia and neutropenia, compared with ET alone (OR = 9.12, 95 % CI = 5.04–16.48, p < 0.001).

Conclusion

The findings of this paper demonstrate a significant improvement in iDFS when ET is combined with CDK4/6i, compared to ET alone. Specifically, treatments with abemaciclib and ribociclib showed notable enhancements in dRFS.
背景本文旨在通过荟萃分析评估将CDK 4/6抑制剂(CDK4/6i)纳入ET辅助治疗HR+HER2切除的早期乳腺癌(ESBC)患者的有效性。方法本文汇编了CDK4/6i用于高危浸润性HR阳性和HER2-ESBC患者辅助治疗的随机临床试验。结果我们确定了四项符合纳入标准的临床试验,这些试验发表于 2020 年至 2024 年之间。这些试验共涉及 17749 例乳腺癌患者。汇总分析得出的数据显示,与单用ET组相比,ET与CDK4/6i联合应用在无浸润性疾病生存期(iDFS)方面有显著的获益趋势(HR = 0.81,95 % CI:0.67-0.98,p = 0.03)。值得注意的是,CDK4/6 抑制剂对 2 级(HR = 0.69,95 % CI:0.59-0.81,p < 0.001)和 3 级(HR = 0.76,95 % CI:0.65-0.89,p < 0.001)患者均有显著疗效。接受abemaciclib和ribociclib治疗组的无远处复发生存期(dRFS)显著改善(HR = 0.65,95 % CI:0.56-0.76,p = 0.001;HR = 0.72,95 % CI:0.58-0.89,p = 0.003)。CDK4/6i在总生存期(OS)方面的差异无统计学意义(HR = 0.96,95 % CI:0.77-1.19,p = 0.69)。与单独使用ET相比,CDK4/6i与ET联合使用会增加不良事件风险,尤其是贫血和中性粒细胞减少症(OR = 9.12, 95 % CI = 5.04-16.48, p <0.001)。具体而言,阿贝昔单抗和利波昔单抗治疗的 dRFS 有明显改善。
{"title":"The efficacy and safety of CDK4/6 inhibitors combined with endocrine therapy versus endocrine therapy alone in the adjuvant treatment of patients with high-risk invasive HR+/HER2-early breast cancer: A comprehensive updated meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials","authors":"Merve Keskinkilic ,&nbsp;Mehmet Emin Arayici ,&nbsp;Yasemin Basbinar ,&nbsp;Hulya Ellidokuz ,&nbsp;Tugba Yavuzsen ,&nbsp;Ilhan Oztop","doi":"10.1016/j.breast.2024.103815","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.breast.2024.103815","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>This paper aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of incorporating CDK 4/6 inhibitors (CDK4/6i) into ET for the adjuvant treatment of HR + HER2-resected early-stage breast cancer (ESBC) patients, employing meta-analysis.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>In this paper, we compiled randomized clinical trials focusing on CDK4/6i used in the adjuvant treatment of high-risk invasive HR-positive and HER2-ESBC patients. A meta-analysis was performed in line with the PRISMA guidelines.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>We identified four clinical trials that met our inclusion criteria and were published between 2020 and 2024. These trials involved a combined sample size of 17,749 patients diagnosed with breast cancer. The data obtained from the pooled analysis revealed a remarkable beneficial trend in terms of invasive disease-free survival (iDFS) for the use of ET in combination with CDK4/6i compared to the group receiving ET alone (HR = 0.81, 95 % CI: 0.67–0.98, <em>p</em> = 0.03). Of note, CDK4/6 inhibitors demonstrated a notably beneficial effect in both grade 2 (HR = 0.69, 95 % CI: 0.59–0.81, p &lt; 0.001) and grade 3 (HR = 0.76, 95 % CI: 0.65–0.89, p &lt; 0.001). Significant improvements were noted in terms of distant relapse-free survival (dRFS) in the groups treated with abemaciclib and ribociclib (HR = 0.65, 95 % CI: 0.56–0.76, <em>p</em> &lt; 0.001; HR = 0.72, 95 % CI: 0.58–0.89, <em>p</em> = 0.003, respectively). CDK4/6i didn't yield a statistically significant difference in overall survival (OS) (HR = 0.96, 95 % CI: 0.77–1.19, <em>p</em> = 0.69). The use of CDK4/6i with ET was associated with an increased risk of adverse events, particularly anemia and neutropenia, compared with ET alone (OR = 9.12, 95 % CI = 5.04–16.48, <em>p</em> &lt; 0.001).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>The findings of this paper demonstrate a significant improvement in iDFS when ET is combined with CDK4/6i, compared to ET alone. Specifically, treatments with abemaciclib and ribociclib showed notable enhancements in dRFS.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":9093,"journal":{"name":"Breast","volume":"78 ","pages":"Article 103815"},"PeriodicalIF":5.7,"publicationDate":"2024-10-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142434103","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
期刊
Breast
全部 Acc. Chem. Res. ACS Applied Bio Materials ACS Appl. Electron. Mater. ACS Appl. Energy Mater. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces ACS Appl. Nano Mater. ACS Appl. Polym. Mater. ACS BIOMATER-SCI ENG ACS Catal. ACS Cent. Sci. ACS Chem. Biol. ACS Chemical Health & Safety ACS Chem. Neurosci. ACS Comb. Sci. ACS Earth Space Chem. ACS Energy Lett. ACS Infect. Dis. ACS Macro Lett. ACS Mater. Lett. ACS Med. Chem. Lett. ACS Nano ACS Omega ACS Photonics ACS Sens. ACS Sustainable Chem. Eng. ACS Synth. Biol. Anal. Chem. BIOCHEMISTRY-US Bioconjugate Chem. BIOMACROMOLECULES Chem. Res. Toxicol. Chem. Rev. Chem. Mater. CRYST GROWTH DES ENERG FUEL Environ. Sci. Technol. Environ. Sci. Technol. Lett. Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. IND ENG CHEM RES Inorg. Chem. J. Agric. Food. Chem. J. Chem. Eng. Data J. Chem. Educ. J. Chem. Inf. Model. J. Chem. Theory Comput. J. Med. Chem. J. Nat. Prod. J PROTEOME RES J. Am. Chem. Soc. LANGMUIR MACROMOLECULES Mol. Pharmaceutics Nano Lett. Org. Lett. ORG PROCESS RES DEV ORGANOMETALLICS J. Org. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. A J. Phys. Chem. B J. Phys. Chem. C J. Phys. Chem. Lett. Analyst Anal. Methods Biomater. Sci. Catal. Sci. Technol. Chem. Commun. Chem. Soc. Rev. CHEM EDUC RES PRACT CRYSTENGCOMM Dalton Trans. Energy Environ. Sci. ENVIRON SCI-NANO ENVIRON SCI-PROC IMP ENVIRON SCI-WAT RES Faraday Discuss. Food Funct. Green Chem. Inorg. Chem. Front. Integr. Biol. J. Anal. At. Spectrom. J. Mater. Chem. A J. Mater. Chem. B J. Mater. Chem. C Lab Chip Mater. Chem. Front. Mater. Horiz. MEDCHEMCOMM Metallomics Mol. Biosyst. Mol. Syst. Des. Eng. Nanoscale Nanoscale Horiz. Nat. Prod. Rep. New J. Chem. Org. Biomol. Chem. Org. Chem. Front. PHOTOCH PHOTOBIO SCI PCCP Polym. Chem.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1