Pub Date : 2024-12-19DOI: 10.1182/blood.2024025624
Ástrún Helga Jónsdóttir, Helga Ágústa Sigurjónsdóttir, Sigrun Thorsteinsdottir, Thorir Einarsson Long, Ingigerður Sólveig Sverrisdóttir, Elias Eythorsson, Jon Thorir Oskarsson, Runólfur Pálsson, Olafur Skuli Indridason, Bryjnar Vidarsson, Pall T Onundarson, Isleifur Olafsson, Ingunn Þorsteinsdóttir, Bjarni A Agnarsson, Margret Sigurdardottir, Asbjorn Jonsson, Malin L Hultcrantz, Brian G M Durie, Stephen Harding, Carl Ola Landgren, Thorvardur Jon Love, Sigurdur Yngvi Kristinsson, Sæmundur Rögnvaldsson
Hypercalcemia in monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance (MGUS) presents a clinical challenge since it may indicate progression to multiple myeloma (MM) but could also be due to a multitude of unrelated disorders. To inform the approach to this clinical challenge, we conducted a nested cohort study within the iStopMM screening study. Of the 75,422 Icelanders aged 40 years and above who underwent screening for MGUS, we included 2,546 with MGUS who were in active follow-up, including regular serum calcium measurements. In total, 191 individuals (7.5%) had hypercalcemia detected at least once, of whom 93 had persistent hypercalcemia (48.7%). MM was found in 3 participants with persistent hypercalcemia (3.2%); all had concurrent bone disease and other end-organ damage. The most common causes of hypercalcemia were primary hyperparathyroidism (56.0%) and malignancies other than MM (16.0%). In this first comprehensive study on hypercalcemia in MGUS, we observed that hypercalcemia rarely indicated MGUS progression and never in the absence of other symptoms of MM. More than half of hypercalcemia cases were transient and the underlying causes were similar to those in the general population. We conclude that hypercalcemia in MGUS should be approached in the same way as in those without MGUS.
{"title":"Approaching Hypercalcemia in Monoclonal Gammopathy of Undetermined Significance: Insights from the iStopMM study.","authors":"Ástrún Helga Jónsdóttir, Helga Ágústa Sigurjónsdóttir, Sigrun Thorsteinsdottir, Thorir Einarsson Long, Ingigerður Sólveig Sverrisdóttir, Elias Eythorsson, Jon Thorir Oskarsson, Runólfur Pálsson, Olafur Skuli Indridason, Bryjnar Vidarsson, Pall T Onundarson, Isleifur Olafsson, Ingunn Þorsteinsdóttir, Bjarni A Agnarsson, Margret Sigurdardottir, Asbjorn Jonsson, Malin L Hultcrantz, Brian G M Durie, Stephen Harding, Carl Ola Landgren, Thorvardur Jon Love, Sigurdur Yngvi Kristinsson, Sæmundur Rögnvaldsson","doi":"10.1182/blood.2024025624","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1182/blood.2024025624","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Hypercalcemia in monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance (MGUS) presents a clinical challenge since it may indicate progression to multiple myeloma (MM) but could also be due to a multitude of unrelated disorders. To inform the approach to this clinical challenge, we conducted a nested cohort study within the iStopMM screening study. Of the 75,422 Icelanders aged 40 years and above who underwent screening for MGUS, we included 2,546 with MGUS who were in active follow-up, including regular serum calcium measurements. In total, 191 individuals (7.5%) had hypercalcemia detected at least once, of whom 93 had persistent hypercalcemia (48.7%). MM was found in 3 participants with persistent hypercalcemia (3.2%); all had concurrent bone disease and other end-organ damage. The most common causes of hypercalcemia were primary hyperparathyroidism (56.0%) and malignancies other than MM (16.0%). In this first comprehensive study on hypercalcemia in MGUS, we observed that hypercalcemia rarely indicated MGUS progression and never in the absence of other symptoms of MM. More than half of hypercalcemia cases were transient and the underlying causes were similar to those in the general population. We conclude that hypercalcemia in MGUS should be approached in the same way as in those without MGUS.</p>","PeriodicalId":9102,"journal":{"name":"Blood","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":21.0,"publicationDate":"2024-12-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142863341","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-12-19DOI: 10.1182/blood.2023020779
Anna Dabrowska-Iwanicka, Grzegorz S Nowakowski
Abstract: Diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL), not otherwise specified, is the most common subtype of large B-cell lymphoma, with differences in prognosis reflecting heterogeneity in the pathological, molecular, and clinical features. Current treatment standard is based on multiagent chemotherapy, including anthracycline and monoclonal anti-CD20 antibody, which leads to cure in 60% of patients. Recent years have brought new insights into lymphoma biology and have helped refine the risk groups. The results of these studies inspired the design of new clinical trials with targeted therapies and response-adapted strategies and allowed to identify groups of patients potentially benefiting from new agents. This review summarizes recent progress in identifying high-risk patients with DLBCL using clinical and biological prognostic factors assessed at diagnosis and during treatment in the front-line setting, as well as new treatment strategies with the application of targeted agents and immunotherapy, including response-adapted strategies.
{"title":"DLBCL: who is high risk and how should treatment be optimized?","authors":"Anna Dabrowska-Iwanicka, Grzegorz S Nowakowski","doi":"10.1182/blood.2023020779","DOIUrl":"10.1182/blood.2023020779","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Abstract: </strong>Diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL), not otherwise specified, is the most common subtype of large B-cell lymphoma, with differences in prognosis reflecting heterogeneity in the pathological, molecular, and clinical features. Current treatment standard is based on multiagent chemotherapy, including anthracycline and monoclonal anti-CD20 antibody, which leads to cure in 60% of patients. Recent years have brought new insights into lymphoma biology and have helped refine the risk groups. The results of these studies inspired the design of new clinical trials with targeted therapies and response-adapted strategies and allowed to identify groups of patients potentially benefiting from new agents. This review summarizes recent progress in identifying high-risk patients with DLBCL using clinical and biological prognostic factors assessed at diagnosis and during treatment in the front-line setting, as well as new treatment strategies with the application of targeted agents and immunotherapy, including response-adapted strategies.</p>","PeriodicalId":9102,"journal":{"name":"Blood","volume":" ","pages":"2573-2582"},"PeriodicalIF":21.0,"publicationDate":"2024-12-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"71433919","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-12-19DOI: 10.1182/blood.2024025977
Bethany Verkamp, Sonata Jodele, Anthony Sabulski, Rebecca Marsh, Pearce Kieser, Michael B Jordan
Abstract: Hemophagocytic lymphohistiocytosis (HLH) is a hyperinflammatory disorder driven by interferon gamma (IFN-γ). Emapalumab, an anti-IFN-γ antibody, is approved for the treatment of patients with primary HLH. Hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) is required for curing HLH. Reduced-intensity conditioning (RIC) HSCT is associated with improved survival but higher incidences of mixed chimerism and secondary graft failure. To understand the potential impact of emapalumab on post-HSCT outcomes, we conducted a retrospective study of pediatric patients with HLH receiving a first RIC-HSCT at our institution between 2014 and 2022 after treatment for HLH, with or without this agent. Mixed chimerism was defined as <95% donor chimerism and severe mixed chimerism as <25% donor chimerism. Intervention-free survival (IFS) included donor lymphocyte infusion, infusion of donor CD34-selected cells, second HSCT, or death within 5 years after HSCT. Fifty patients met the inclusion criteria; 22 received emapalumab within 21 days before the conditioning regimen, and 28 did not. The use of emapalumab was associated with a markedly lower incidence of mixed chimerism (48% vs 77%; P = .03) and severe mixed chimerism (5% vs 38%; P < .01). IFS was significantly higher in patients receiving emapalumab (73% vs 43%; P = .03). Improved IFS was even more striking in infants aged <12 months, a group at the highest risk for mixed chimerism (75% vs 20%; P < .01). Although overall survival was higher with emapalumab, this difference was not significant (82% vs 71%; P = .39). We show that the use of emapalumab for HLH before HSCT mitigates the risk of mixed chimerism and graft failure after RIC-HSCT.
{"title":"Emapalumab therapy for hemophagocytic lymphohistiocytosis before reduced-intensity transplantation improves chimerism.","authors":"Bethany Verkamp, Sonata Jodele, Anthony Sabulski, Rebecca Marsh, Pearce Kieser, Michael B Jordan","doi":"10.1182/blood.2024025977","DOIUrl":"10.1182/blood.2024025977","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Abstract: </strong>Hemophagocytic lymphohistiocytosis (HLH) is a hyperinflammatory disorder driven by interferon gamma (IFN-γ). Emapalumab, an anti-IFN-γ antibody, is approved for the treatment of patients with primary HLH. Hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) is required for curing HLH. Reduced-intensity conditioning (RIC) HSCT is associated with improved survival but higher incidences of mixed chimerism and secondary graft failure. To understand the potential impact of emapalumab on post-HSCT outcomes, we conducted a retrospective study of pediatric patients with HLH receiving a first RIC-HSCT at our institution between 2014 and 2022 after treatment for HLH, with or without this agent. Mixed chimerism was defined as <95% donor chimerism and severe mixed chimerism as <25% donor chimerism. Intervention-free survival (IFS) included donor lymphocyte infusion, infusion of donor CD34-selected cells, second HSCT, or death within 5 years after HSCT. Fifty patients met the inclusion criteria; 22 received emapalumab within 21 days before the conditioning regimen, and 28 did not. The use of emapalumab was associated with a markedly lower incidence of mixed chimerism (48% vs 77%; P = .03) and severe mixed chimerism (5% vs 38%; P < .01). IFS was significantly higher in patients receiving emapalumab (73% vs 43%; P = .03). Improved IFS was even more striking in infants aged <12 months, a group at the highest risk for mixed chimerism (75% vs 20%; P < .01). Although overall survival was higher with emapalumab, this difference was not significant (82% vs 71%; P = .39). We show that the use of emapalumab for HLH before HSCT mitigates the risk of mixed chimerism and graft failure after RIC-HSCT.</p>","PeriodicalId":9102,"journal":{"name":"Blood","volume":" ","pages":"2625-2636"},"PeriodicalIF":21.0,"publicationDate":"2024-12-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142071997","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-12-19DOI: 10.1182/blood.2024026314
K Vinod Vijayan
{"title":"Platelets on fire during chemotherapy.","authors":"K Vinod Vijayan","doi":"10.1182/blood.2024026314","DOIUrl":"10.1182/blood.2024026314","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":9102,"journal":{"name":"Blood","volume":"144 25","pages":"2568-2570"},"PeriodicalIF":21.0,"publicationDate":"2024-12-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142852685","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-12-19DOI: 10.1182/blood.2024026932
Johannes M Waldschmidt, Leo Rasche
{"title":"BCMA bispecifics: breaking the chains of resistance.","authors":"Johannes M Waldschmidt, Leo Rasche","doi":"10.1182/blood.2024026932","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1182/blood.2024026932","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":9102,"journal":{"name":"Blood","volume":"144 25","pages":"2566-2568"},"PeriodicalIF":21.0,"publicationDate":"2024-12-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142852714","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-12-19DOI: 10.1182/blood.2023020780
Andrew J Davies
Abstract: Both the 2022 World Health Organization Classification of Hematolymphoid Tumors, 5th Edition and the International Consensus Classification of lymphoma have refined the way we now approach high-grade B-cell lymphoma (HGBL) with MYC and BCL2 and/or BCL6 rearrangements moving the previous generation of classification a step forward. The unifying biology of MYC/BCL2 tumors has become clearer and their inferior prognosis confirmed compared with those with morphologic similar phenotypes but lacking the classifcation defining cytogenetic abnormalities. Fluorescent in situ hybridization testing has now become largely population based, and we have learned much from this. We can readily define molecular categories and apply these widely to clinical practice. Uncertainty has, however, been shed on the place of MYC/BCL6 translocations in defining a common disease group of double hit lymphoma due to biological heterogeneity. We have enhanced our knowledge of outcomes and the role of therapy intensification to overcome chemotherapy resistance in HGBL. For those patients failed by initial induction chemotherapy, immunotherapy approaches, including chimeric antigen receptor T-cell therapies, are improving outcomes. Novel inhibitors, targeting dysregulated oncogenic proteins, are being explored at pace. The rare, but difficult, diagnostic classification HGBL (not otherwise specified) remains a diagnosis of exclusion with limited data on an optimal clinical approach. The days of talking loosely of double- and triple-hit lymphoma are numbered as biology and outcomes may not be shared. This review synergizes the current data on biology, prognosis, and therapies in HGBL.
{"title":"The high-grade B-cell lymphomas: double hit and more.","authors":"Andrew J Davies","doi":"10.1182/blood.2023020780","DOIUrl":"10.1182/blood.2023020780","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Abstract: </strong>Both the 2022 World Health Organization Classification of Hematolymphoid Tumors, 5th Edition and the International Consensus Classification of lymphoma have refined the way we now approach high-grade B-cell lymphoma (HGBL) with MYC and BCL2 and/or BCL6 rearrangements moving the previous generation of classification a step forward. The unifying biology of MYC/BCL2 tumors has become clearer and their inferior prognosis confirmed compared with those with morphologic similar phenotypes but lacking the classifcation defining cytogenetic abnormalities. Fluorescent in situ hybridization testing has now become largely population based, and we have learned much from this. We can readily define molecular categories and apply these widely to clinical practice. Uncertainty has, however, been shed on the place of MYC/BCL6 translocations in defining a common disease group of double hit lymphoma due to biological heterogeneity. We have enhanced our knowledge of outcomes and the role of therapy intensification to overcome chemotherapy resistance in HGBL. For those patients failed by initial induction chemotherapy, immunotherapy approaches, including chimeric antigen receptor T-cell therapies, are improving outcomes. Novel inhibitors, targeting dysregulated oncogenic proteins, are being explored at pace. The rare, but difficult, diagnostic classification HGBL (not otherwise specified) remains a diagnosis of exclusion with limited data on an optimal clinical approach. The days of talking loosely of double- and triple-hit lymphoma are numbered as biology and outcomes may not be shared. This review synergizes the current data on biology, prognosis, and therapies in HGBL.</p>","PeriodicalId":9102,"journal":{"name":"Blood","volume":" ","pages":"2583-2592"},"PeriodicalIF":21.0,"publicationDate":"2024-12-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142457841","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-12-19DOI: 10.1182/blood.2024025712
Alessandro Casini
Quantitative fibrinogen disorders, including afibrinogenemia and hypofibrinogenemia, are defined by the complete absence or reduction of fibrinogen, respectively. The diagnosis is based on the measurement of fibrinogen activity and antigen levels, which define the severity of this monogenic disorder. Afibrinogenemia is the result of homozygosity or combined heterozygosity for the causative mutations, whereas monoallelic mutations lead to hypofibrinogenemia. The bleeding phenotype varies in accordance with fibrinogen levels, ranging generally from frequent and often life-threatening bleeding in afibrinogenemia to the absence of symptoms or mild bleeding symptoms in mild hypofibrinogenemia. The main treatment for quantitative fibrinogen disorders is fibrinogen supplementation. Despite low fibrinogen levels, a tendency for thrombosis is a characteristic of these disorders and may be exacerbated by fibrinogen supplementation. The management of surgery and pregnancy presents significant challenges regarding the amount of fibrinogen replacement and the need for thromboprophylaxis. The objective of this article is to present four clinical scenarios that illustrate common clinical challenges and to propose strategies for managing bleeding, thrombosis, surgery, and pregnancy.
{"title":"How I treat quantitative fibrinogen disorders.","authors":"Alessandro Casini","doi":"10.1182/blood.2024025712","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1182/blood.2024025712","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Quantitative fibrinogen disorders, including afibrinogenemia and hypofibrinogenemia, are defined by the complete absence or reduction of fibrinogen, respectively. The diagnosis is based on the measurement of fibrinogen activity and antigen levels, which define the severity of this monogenic disorder. Afibrinogenemia is the result of homozygosity or combined heterozygosity for the causative mutations, whereas monoallelic mutations lead to hypofibrinogenemia. The bleeding phenotype varies in accordance with fibrinogen levels, ranging generally from frequent and often life-threatening bleeding in afibrinogenemia to the absence of symptoms or mild bleeding symptoms in mild hypofibrinogenemia. The main treatment for quantitative fibrinogen disorders is fibrinogen supplementation. Despite low fibrinogen levels, a tendency for thrombosis is a characteristic of these disorders and may be exacerbated by fibrinogen supplementation. The management of surgery and pregnancy presents significant challenges regarding the amount of fibrinogen replacement and the need for thromboprophylaxis. The objective of this article is to present four clinical scenarios that illustrate common clinical challenges and to propose strategies for managing bleeding, thrombosis, surgery, and pregnancy.</p>","PeriodicalId":9102,"journal":{"name":"Blood","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":21.0,"publicationDate":"2024-12-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142863352","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-12-19DOI: 10.1182/blood.2024025899
Rajshekhar Chakraborty, Saurabh Zanwar, Ute Hegenbart, Divaya Bhutani, Morie A Gertz, Angela Dispenzieri, Shaji Kumar, Anita D'Souza, Anannya Patwari, Andrew Cowan, GuiZhen Chen, Paolo Milani, Giovanni Palladini, Vaishali Sanchorawala, Geethika Bodanapu, Stefan O Schönland, Suzanne Lentzsch, Eli Muchtar
Abstract: We performed an international retrospective study on 283 patients with light chain (AL) amyloidosis to investigate the prognostic impact of cytogenetic abnormalities by fluorescence in situ hybridization, when treated with frontline daratumumab-based therapy. The cytogenetic subgroups of interest were t(11;14), gain/amp(1q) (hereafter, +1q), hyperdiploidy, deletion(13q), del(17p), and myeloma high-risk (HR) translocations (t[4;14], t[14;16], or t[14;20]). The end points of interest were rate of hematologic complete response (heme-CR), very good partial response (VGPR) or better, and hematologic event-free survival (heme-EFS). The incidence of abnormalities was as follows: t(11;14), 53.4%; deletion (13q), 28.9%; +1q, 22.3%; hyperdiploidy, 19.4%; HR translocations, 6.6%; and deletion(17p), 4.5%. The heme-CR rate by cytogenetic subgroups were as follows: t(11;14) vs no t(11;14), 45.2% vs 41.8% (P=0.597); del(13q) vs no del(13q), 46.8% vs 42.8% (P=0.594); +1q vs no +1q, 30.2% vs 47.9% (P=0.022); hyperdiploidy vs no hyperdiploidy, 39.5% vs 44.9% (P=0.541); HR translocations vs none, 45.5% vs 43.1% (P=0.877); and del(17p) vs no del(17p), 50.0% vs 42.9% (P=0.658), respectively. Similarly, +1q was the only subgroup with a significantly lower VGPR or better rate (64.2% vs 79.0%; P=0.033). At a median follow-up of 19.8 months, the median heme-EFS was 49.6 months (95% CI, 24.7-not reached [NR]), and the 2-year overall survival (OS) was 80.98% (95% CI, 75.6-85.4). The presence of +1q was significantly associated with worse heme-EFS on multivariate analysis (HR 2.06, 95% CI, 1.14-3.71; P=0.017). Notably, there was no adverse prognostic impact of t(11;14) on heme-EFS or OS. In conclusion, +1q is associated with worse outcome in the daratumumab-era. Clinical trials testing novel frontline immunotherapies should be enriched in +1q to further improve outcomes in this subgroup.
我们开展了一项国际回顾性队列研究,通过FISH检测283例接受达拉单抗-硼替佐米-环磷酰胺-地塞米松(Dara-VCD)或达拉-VD前线治疗的AL淀粉样变性患者的细胞遗传学异常对预后的影响。关注的细胞遗传学亚组包括t(11;14)、增益/amp(1q) [以下简称+1q]、高二倍体、缺失(13q)、缺失(17p)和骨髓瘤高危(HR)易位(t[4;14]、t[14;16]或t[14;20])。研究终点为血液学完全反应率(血红素 CR)、非常好的部分反应或更好的反应率(≥VGPR)和血液学无事件生存率(血红素 EFS)。异常发生率如下:t(11;14)-53.4%;缺失(13q)-28.9%;+1q-22.3%;高二倍体-19.4%;HR 易位-6.6%;缺失(17p)-4.5%。细胞遗传亚组的血红素-CR率分别为:t(11;14) vs no t(11;14)-45.2% vs 41.8% (p=0.597);del(13q) vs no del(13q)-46.8% vs 42.8% (p=0.594);+1q vs no +1q-30.2% vs 47.9% (p=0.022);高二倍体 vs no高二倍体(17p)-4.5%。022);超二倍体 vs 无超二倍体-39.5% vs 44.9%(p=0.541);HR 易位 vs 无:45.5% vs 43.1%(p=0.877);del(17p) vs 无 del(17p)-分别为 50.0% vs 42.9%(p=0.658)。同样,+1q是唯一一个≥VGPR率显著较低的亚组(64.2% vs 79.0%;p=0.033)。中位随访 19.8 个月,中位血红蛋白-EFS 为 49.6 个月(95% CI,24.7-未达 [NR]),2 年 OS 为 80.98%(95% CI,75.6-85.4)。多变量分析显示,+1q的存在与血红蛋白-EFS的恶化显著相关(HR 2.06,95% CI,1.14-3.71;P=0.017)。值得注意的是,t(11;14)对血红素EFS或OS没有不良预后影响。总之,在达拉单抗时代,+1q与较差的预后相关。测试新型免疫疗法的前线临床试验应在+1q中富集,以进一步改善该亚组的预后。
{"title":"Prognostic impact of cytogenetic abnormalities detected by FISH in AL amyloidosis with daratumumab-based frontline therapy.","authors":"Rajshekhar Chakraborty, Saurabh Zanwar, Ute Hegenbart, Divaya Bhutani, Morie A Gertz, Angela Dispenzieri, Shaji Kumar, Anita D'Souza, Anannya Patwari, Andrew Cowan, GuiZhen Chen, Paolo Milani, Giovanni Palladini, Vaishali Sanchorawala, Geethika Bodanapu, Stefan O Schönland, Suzanne Lentzsch, Eli Muchtar","doi":"10.1182/blood.2024025899","DOIUrl":"10.1182/blood.2024025899","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Abstract: </strong>We performed an international retrospective study on 283 patients with light chain (AL) amyloidosis to investigate the prognostic impact of cytogenetic abnormalities by fluorescence in situ hybridization, when treated with frontline daratumumab-based therapy. The cytogenetic subgroups of interest were t(11;14), gain/amp(1q) (hereafter, +1q), hyperdiploidy, deletion(13q), del(17p), and myeloma high-risk (HR) translocations (t[4;14], t[14;16], or t[14;20]). The end points of interest were rate of hematologic complete response (heme-CR), very good partial response (VGPR) or better, and hematologic event-free survival (heme-EFS). The incidence of abnormalities was as follows: t(11;14), 53.4%; deletion (13q), 28.9%; +1q, 22.3%; hyperdiploidy, 19.4%; HR translocations, 6.6%; and deletion(17p), 4.5%. The heme-CR rate by cytogenetic subgroups were as follows: t(11;14) vs no t(11;14), 45.2% vs 41.8% (P=0.597); del(13q) vs no del(13q), 46.8% vs 42.8% (P=0.594); +1q vs no +1q, 30.2% vs 47.9% (P=0.022); hyperdiploidy vs no hyperdiploidy, 39.5% vs 44.9% (P=0.541); HR translocations vs none, 45.5% vs 43.1% (P=0.877); and del(17p) vs no del(17p), 50.0% vs 42.9% (P=0.658), respectively. Similarly, +1q was the only subgroup with a significantly lower VGPR or better rate (64.2% vs 79.0%; P=0.033). At a median follow-up of 19.8 months, the median heme-EFS was 49.6 months (95% CI, 24.7-not reached [NR]), and the 2-year overall survival (OS) was 80.98% (95% CI, 75.6-85.4). The presence of +1q was significantly associated with worse heme-EFS on multivariate analysis (HR 2.06, 95% CI, 1.14-3.71; P=0.017). Notably, there was no adverse prognostic impact of t(11;14) on heme-EFS or OS. In conclusion, +1q is associated with worse outcome in the daratumumab-era. Clinical trials testing novel frontline immunotherapies should be enriched in +1q to further improve outcomes in this subgroup.</p>","PeriodicalId":9102,"journal":{"name":"Blood","volume":" ","pages":"2613-2624"},"PeriodicalIF":21.0,"publicationDate":"2024-12-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142085959","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-12-19DOI: 10.1182/blood.2023020913
Laurie H Sehn, Michael Hallek
{"title":"Introduction to a review series on high-risk aggressive lymphoma.","authors":"Laurie H Sehn, Michael Hallek","doi":"10.1182/blood.2023020913","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1182/blood.2023020913","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":9102,"journal":{"name":"Blood","volume":"144 25","pages":"2561-2562"},"PeriodicalIF":21.0,"publicationDate":"2024-12-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142852717","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-12-19DOI: 10.1182/blood.2024026991
Camille Ettelaie
{"title":"Licking the wound with procoagulant vesicles.","authors":"Camille Ettelaie","doi":"10.1182/blood.2024026991","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1182/blood.2024026991","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":9102,"journal":{"name":"Blood","volume":"144 25","pages":"2570-2571"},"PeriodicalIF":21.0,"publicationDate":"2024-12-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142852718","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}