Australian health review : a publication of the Australian Hospital Association最新文献

ObjectiveWorkforce shortages in hospitals have necessitated a focus on recruitment and retention of health professionals. The aim of this systematic review was to synthesise literature relating to factors that affect recruitment and retention of allied health professionals working in hospital settings.MethodPubMed, CINAHL (via EbscoHost), Embase (via Elsevier), and Scopus Advanced Search databases were used to retrieve 1665 studies, of which 16 were included. Herzberg's two-factor theory was used to synthesise study findings and develop key themes.ResultsJob advancement, company policies, supervision (leadership), working conditions, salary, recognition, and growth opportunities were factors identified as affecting recruitment and retention.ConclusionIdentified factors are largely amenable to change and could contribute to a more sustainable allied health workforce in hospitals and enhance the quality of care. This research could significantly impact and enhance the evidence supporting interventions and strategies that are critical for retaining the allied health workforce in hospitals.

Objective Telepsychiatry consultations grew rapidly with increased total consultations and reduced face-to-face consultations following the pandemic-triggered expansion of Medicare Benefits Schedule (MBS) telehealth items. It was unclear how much telehealth expansion independently impacted overall and face-to-face consultation trends after accounting for lockdown severity. Methods We extracted monthly MBS Item Reports for psychiatric consultations (January 2012-December 2023). The monthly average Stringency Index (SI) for Australia represented lockdown severity from January 2020 to December 2022. A dichotomous variable denoted telehealth expansion (March 2020 onward). We constructed consecutive multiple linear regression models for combined consultations and face-to-face consultations to include seasonality, trend, SI, and telehealth expansion. We compared model performance using information criteria. Results Median monthly total consultations increased from 148,413 (Interquartile range, IQR: 138,219-153,709) pre-expansion (January 2012-February 2020) to 173,016 (IQR: 158,292-182,463) post-expansion (March 2020-December 2023). Contrarily, median monthly face-to-face consultations decreased from 143,726 (IQR: 135,812-150,153) to 99,272 (IQR: 87,513-107,778). Seasonality and trend were present in both time series. The time series regression model with expansion but excluding SI best explained all consultations, while both telehealth expansion and SI were significant in the best-fit model for face-to-face consultations. Conclusion MBS telehealth expansion was associated with total and face-to-face consultations independent of lockdown severity changes. Policy changes allowing wider access to new telehealth services have possibly led to increased uptake of psychiatric care and addressed previously unmet needs.

Living Well, Living Longer (The Program) is an integrated care strategy to improve the physical health of people living with severe mental illness within a public mental health service. The significant life expectancy gap experienced by this cohort is largely attributed to higher rates of cardiovascular disease and modifiable risk factors. The Program addresses this by guiding people through the four stages of screening, detection, treatment initiation, and ongoing management of coexisting chronic health conditions. The Program adopted an integrated care approach to ensure the provision of appropriate and coordinated care across hospital and primary care services. Key care pathways include a cardiometabolic health assessment clinic, shared care with general practitioners, oral health services partnership and employment of peer support workers, dietitians, exercise physiologists, and smoking cessation to provide targeted community support and interventions. There has been strong engagement with the care pathways introduced since The Program's inception in 2013 and evaluation is currently underway to consider the impact on cardiometabolic health outcomes for participants. Critical to The Program's effectiveness has been engagement with lived experience expertise, multidisciplinary collaboration, and strong executive support. However, significant challenges persist amid an Australian public health crisis characterised by reducing rates of free primary healthcare access for people living with severe mental illness and enduring communication challenges between primary and secondary health services. With the implementation of MyMedicare and the imminent Single Digital Patient Record across NSW Health, we stand at a critical juncture. It is imperative to establish robust systems to enhance care for this vulnerable population.

Objective Patient expectations in the Australian healthcare system are for coordinated, collaborative practice. There is a need for education institutions, health services, accreditation authorities, and consumers to work together to achieve this goal. As part of a larger body of work, we sought to understand how these stakeholders contribute to the development of collaborative healthcare practice. Method Nineteen focus groups were conducted in 2022 with 84 participants consisting of education providers (n =62), consumers (n =10), representatives from the Health Profession's Education Standing Group (n =8), and health service practitioners (n =4). Framework analysis was initially undertaken to understand facilitators of, and barriers to, collaborative practice and learning. In a secondary analysis, the themes were re-organised according to the Bolman and Deal domains of organisational practice, to make explicit the structural, human resource, political, and symbolic factors deemed useful for re-imaging a process for learning about and incentivising collaborative practice. Results There are multiple factors across healthcare settings that both facilitate and challenge the development of collaborative practice. Co-location of professions and participation in formal interprofessional processes such as team meetings and handovers facilitated learning collaborative practice, although traditional cultures which perpetuate siloed models of healthcare, power differentials between the professions, funding structures, and information sharing limited opportunities. The 'value' of collaborative practice was facilitated through both consistent curriculum messages throughout health professional courses and positive role modelling. Conclusions Education institutions, health service practitioners, accreditation authorities, and consumers can work together to facilitate the development of collaborative practice through attention to policy and processes, curriculum activities, student participation, health service activities and practice, and resource allocation.

Objective Voluntary assisted dying (VAD) began in Queensland in January 2023 but little is known about its practical operation. This research examined models of care for providing VAD in Queensland. Methods Semi-structured interviews were conducted with 24 participants involved with VAD delivery across Queensland's 16 Health and Hospital Services (HHSs). Participants included HHS VAD Coordinators, nurse practitioners and nurses who acted as administering practitioners, and Queensland VAD Support and Pharmacy Service (QVAD SPS) staff. Results Five themes about Queensland VAD models of care were developed: VAD is accessed almost exclusively through the public sector via HHSs, influenced by a Health Service Directive; local models of care vary; nurses play significant roles facilitating access to and providing VAD; QVAD SPS has been instrumental supporting HHSs and ensuring statewide access as back-up VAD provider; and VAD services need more resourcing. Conclusions The Queensland approach to providing VAD has been largely successful in ensuring patient access across the state. However, it differs from previous Australian VAD models with access predominantly through the public sector, greater roles played by nurse practitioners/nurses, and VAD being provided by QVAD SPS. Under-resourcing and consistency in provision of VAD services remain challenges.

Objective The introduction and implementation of voluntary assisted dying (VAD) legislation represents a major shift in Australian health policy. Given potential repercussions for health professionals, understanding how they are being affected by this legislation is important to guide future policy and legislative changes. This study aims to explore the perspectives and experiences of Australian health professionals on VAD and compare impacts on those working under different state legislation in Victoria and WA. Methods Data were collected using a cross-sectional survey design, targeting health professionals nationally, primarily doctors and nurses. The survey had closed and open-ended response options, was informed by previous publications and was piloted prior to further roll-out. Recruitment was via professional networks and social media. Quantitative data were descriptively analysed and qualitative data were coded using NVivo and thematically analysed. Results There was a final sample size of 223. Impacts on clinicians identified include inadequate remuneration, a need for ongoing support and the recognition of barriers to mandatory training. Conclusions Impacts on health practitioners, if not addressed, have future implications for workforce sustainability. Increasing numbers of trained VAD practitioners may enable distribution of clinical load and prevent burnout. VAD practitioners are not being appropriately remunerated, which could be addressed by introducing dedicated Medicare Benefits Schedule items for VAD. Attention should also be given to incentivising training, including continuing professional development accreditation and appropriate funding. Strategies to support staff could include debriefing, mentoring, peer support and psychological consultations.

Objective This study aim was to develop a predictive model of bed utilisation to support the decision process of elective surgery planning and bed management to improve post-surgical care. Methods This study undertook a retrospective analysis of de-identified data from a tertiary metropolitan hospital in Southeast Queensland, Australia. With a reference sample from 2years of historical data, a model based on the Monte Carlo method has been developed to predict hospital bed utilisation for post-surgical care of patients who have undergone surgical procedures. A separate test sample from comparable data of 8weeks of actual utilisation was employed to assess the performance of the prediction model. Results Applying the developed prediction model to an 8-week period test sample, the mean percentage error of the prediction was 1.5% and the mean absolute percentage error 5.4%. Conclusions The predictive model developed in this study may assist in bed management and the planning process of elective surgeries, and in so doing also reduce the likelihood of Emergency Department access block.

Australia has world-class education for healthcare professionals and is recognised for its strength in digital health research but is yet to fill some important gaps in training healthcare professionals in the safe implementation and use of digital technologies. In this case study, we bring together the perspectives of clinicians, health system leaders, and academics to guide efforts in establishing a digitally enabled workforce in Australia. Building on published evidence, our recommendations include leveraging on recent momentum, building strong partnerships with healthcare organisations, academia, and the digital health industry, and ultimately an expansion of a digitally enabled clinical informatics and digital health workforce.

Objective This study aimed to explore patient and nurse perceptions of using a prototype co-designed app to support patient-nurse communication and patient engagement in bedside handover. Methods This qualitative descriptive study evaluated usability of the app with a convenience sample of patient-nurse dyads in a 22-bed medical/oncology ward, during morning shifts. Participants were nurses, and patients proficient in English but without cognitive impairment or physical or mental distress. Patients entered healthcare questions and preferences into the app, nurses acknowledged the information in the app and responded during their usual workflow. Patient comfort level with app use was surveyed. Handovers were observed, and patient involvement rated. After handover, semi-structured interviews and feedback surveys on app usability were conducted. Interviews were recorded, transcribed, and then analysed thematically. Survey data were analysed using descriptive statistics. Results Patient-nurse dyads (n =18) used the app between March and May 2023. Patients were mostly older (median 69.5years; IQR 52.3, 75), female, and frequent users of smartphones. Nurses were mostly younger (median 23years; IQR 21, 40) and female. Five themes were identified, which indicated that using the app empowered patients to engage in healthcare communications, facilitated opportunities for patient-centred information sharing, and refocused nurses' attention onto patient-centred care. Views differed on the app's influence on patient involvement in handover. Surveys (n =36, 100%) indicated that the interface was easy to navigate, features were useful, and only minor amendments were suggested. Conclusion This prototype app shows potential to facilitate patient-centred communication and patient engagement with health care, including bedside handover. With further refinement and testing, this app could enhance experiences of care and reduce harm from miscommunication.