首页 > 最新文献

Brachytherapy最新文献

英文 中文
PO73 PO73
Pub Date : 2023-09-01 DOI: 10.1016/j.brachy.2023.06.174
Wiwatchai Sittiwong, Pittaya Dankulchai
Purpose To identify a predictive factor associated with local recurrence in prostate cancer patients receiving HDR brachytherapy. Materials and Methods Localized, non-metastatic prostate cancer patients who were treated with brachytherapy with or without external beam radiation (EBRT) between January 2015 to December 2021 were retrospectively reviewed. HDR monotherapy was prescribed at 19 Gy to prostate while HDR brachytherapy was prescribed at 15 Gy to prostate after EBRT of 45-50 Gy to whole pelvis. Factors to identify a predictor of local recurrence included prostate volume, dominant intraprostatic lesion (DIL) volume, PSA density and DIL-concentrated PSA (DILcPSA). DILcPSA is defined as the PSA density within the area of DIL volume which can be calculated by PSA density multiplied by DIL volume. Baseline patient characteristics and tumor characteristics were reported. Univariate and multivariate analysis were performed to identify factors associated local recurrence by using Cox's regression analysis. Results 32 patients with the median follow up time of 59.2 months were included. The median age of patients was 70 years. Most patients were categorized as unfavorable to very high risk (19 patients, 59.4%); however, most common grade group was grade group 2 (14 patients, 43.7%). Most patients received androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) either by medication or surgical castration (25 patients, 78.1%). The proportion of patients underwent HDR brachytherapy as monotherapy (18 patients, 56.2%) was similar to as a boost (14 patients, 43.8%). For tumor characteristics, most of DILs were located at peripheral zone (28 patients, 87.5%). Median DIL volume and prostate volume were 1.13 ml (95%CI 0.78 to 1.48), and 39.4 ml (95%CI 31.38 to 47.42), respectively. Median PSA density and DILcPSA were 0.30 (95%CI 0.12 to 0.48) and 0.33 (95%CI 0.15 to 0.51), respectively. There were 9 patients developed local recurrence. The rate of 5-year local recurrence-free survival was 68.5%. Among factors selected to predict local recurrence, DILcPSA was found to be significantly associated with local recurrence for both univariate and multivariate Cox's regression analysis with HR of 2.10 (95%CI 1.12 to 27.67) p=0.035 and 2.06 (95%CI 1.09 to 27.41) p 0.039, respectively. Prostate volume, DIL volume and PSA density were found no significant correlation with local recurrence. Conclusions DILcPSA could be a potential predictive factor to predict local recurrence in prostate cancer patients receiving HDR brachytherapy. To identify a predictive factor associated with local recurrence in prostate cancer patients receiving HDR brachytherapy. Localized, non-metastatic prostate cancer patients who were treated with brachytherapy with or without external beam radiation (EBRT) between January 2015 to December 2021 were retrospectively reviewed. HDR monotherapy was prescribed at 19 Gy to prostate while HDR brachytherapy was prescribed at 15 Gy to prostate after EBRT of 45-50 Gy to wh
目的探讨前列腺癌患者接受HDR近距离放疗后局部复发的预测因素。材料与方法回顾性分析2015年1月至2021年12月期间接受近距离或不加外束放疗(EBRT)治疗的局限性非转移性前列腺癌患者。全骨盆EBRT 45 ~ 50 Gy后,HDR单药治疗19 Gy, HDR近距离治疗15 Gy。预测局部复发的因素包括前列腺体积、显性前列腺内病变(DIL)体积、PSA密度和DIL浓缩PSA (DILcPSA)。DILcPSA定义为DIL体积范围内的PSA密度,由PSA密度乘以DIL体积计算得到。报告基线患者特征和肿瘤特征。采用Cox回归分析进行单因素和多因素分析,以确定局部复发相关因素。结果32例患者,中位随访时间59.2个月。患者中位年龄为70岁。大多数患者为不良至高危(19例,59.4%);然而,最常见的分级组是2级组(14例,43.7%)。大多数患者接受药物或手术阉割的雄激素剥夺治疗(ADT)(25例,78.1%)。接受HDR近距离放疗作为单药治疗的患者比例(18例,56.2%)与强化治疗(14例,43.8%)相似。从肿瘤特征来看,大部分DILs位于外周带(28例,87.5%)。中位DIL容积和前列腺容积分别为1.13 ml (95%CI 0.78 ~ 1.48)和39.4 ml (95%CI 31.38 ~ 47.42)。中位PSA密度和DILcPSA分别为0.30 (95%CI 0.12 ~ 0.48)和0.33 (95%CI 0.15 ~ 0.51)。局部复发9例。5年局部无复发生存率为68.5%。在预测局部复发的因素中,单因素和多因素Cox回归分析均发现DILcPSA与局部复发有显著相关性,HR分别为2.10 (95%CI 1.12 ~ 27.67) p=0.035和2.06 (95%CI 1.09 ~ 27.41) p= 0.039。前列腺体积、DIL体积和PSA密度与局部复发无显著相关性。结论DILcPSA可作为预测前列腺癌HDR近距离放疗患者局部复发的潜在预测因素。目的:探讨接受HDR近距离放疗的前列腺癌患者局部复发的预测因素。本研究回顾性回顾了2015年1月至2021年12月期间接受近距离放射治疗或不接受外束放疗(EBRT)的局部非转移性前列腺癌患者。全骨盆EBRT 45 ~ 50 Gy后,HDR单药治疗19 Gy, HDR近距离治疗15 Gy。预测局部复发的因素包括前列腺体积、显性前列腺内病变(DIL)体积、PSA密度和DIL浓缩PSA (DILcPSA)。DILcPSA定义为DIL体积范围内的PSA密度,由PSA密度乘以DIL体积计算得到。报告基线患者特征和肿瘤特征。采用Cox回归分析进行单因素和多因素分析,以确定局部复发相关因素。32例患者中位随访时间为59.2个月。患者中位年龄为70岁。大多数患者为不良至高危(19例,59.4%);然而,最常见的分级组是2级组(14例,43.7%)。大多数患者接受药物或手术阉割的雄激素剥夺治疗(ADT)(25例,78.1%)。接受HDR近距离放疗作为单药治疗的患者比例(18例,56.2%)与强化治疗(14例,43.8%)相似。从肿瘤特征来看,大部分DILs位于外周带(28例,87.5%)。中位DIL容积和前列腺容积分别为1.13 ml (95%CI 0.78 ~ 1.48)和39.4 ml (95%CI 31.38 ~ 47.42)。中位PSA密度和DILcPSA分别为0.30 (95%CI 0.12 ~ 0.48)和0.33 (95%CI 0.15 ~ 0.51)。局部复发9例。5年局部无复发生存率为68.5%。在预测局部复发的因素中,单因素和多因素Cox回归分析均发现DILcPSA与局部复发有显著相关性,HR分别为2.10 (95%CI 1.12 ~ 27.67) p=0.035和2.06 (95%CI 1.09 ~ 27.41) p= 0.039。前列腺体积、DIL体积和PSA密度与局部复发无显著相关性。 目的探讨前列腺癌患者接受HDR近距离放疗后局部复发的预测因素。材料与方法回顾性分析2015年1月至2021年12月期间接受近距离或不加外束放疗(EBRT)治疗的局限性非转移性前列腺癌患者。全骨盆EBRT 45 ~ 50 Gy后,HDR单药治疗19 Gy, HDR近距离治疗15 Gy。预测局部复发的因素包括前列腺体积、显性前列腺内病变(DIL)体积、PSA密度和DIL浓缩PSA (DILcPSA)。DILcPSA定义为DIL体积范围内的PSA密度,由PSA密度乘以DIL体积计算得到。报告基线患者特征和肿瘤特征。采用Cox回归分析进行单因素和多因素分析,以确定局部复发相关因素。结果32例患者,中位随访时间59.2个月。患者中位年龄为70岁。大多数患者为不良至高危(19例,59.4%);然而,最常见的分级组是2级组(14例,43.7%)。大多数患者接受药物或手术阉割的雄激素剥夺治疗(ADT)(25例,78.1%)。接受HDR近距离放疗作为单药治疗的患者比例(18例,56.2%)与强化治疗(14例,43.8%)相似。从肿瘤特征来看,大部分DILs位于外周带(28例,87.5%)。中位DIL容积和前列腺容积分别为1.13 ml (95%CI 0.78 ~ 1.48)和39.4 ml (95%CI 31.38 ~ 47.42)。中位PSA密度和DILcPSA分别为0.30 (95%CI 0.12 ~ 0.48)和0.33 (95%CI 0.15 ~ 0.51)。局部复发9例。5年局部无复发生存率为68.5%。在预测局部复发的因素中,单因素和多因素Cox回归分析均发现DILcPSA与局部复发有显著相关性,HR分别为2.10 (95%CI 1.12 ~ 27.67) p=0.035和2.06 (95%CI 1.09 ~ 27.41) p= 0.039。前列腺体积、DIL体积和PSA密度与局部复发无显著相关性。结论DILcPSA可作为预测前列腺癌HDR近距离放疗患者局部复发的潜在预测因素。目的:探讨接受HDR近距离放疗的前列腺癌患者局部复发的预测因素。本研究回顾性回顾了2015年1月至2021年12月期间接受近距离放射治疗或不接受外束放疗(EBRT)的局部非转移性前列腺癌患者。全骨盆EBRT 45 ~ 50 Gy后,HDR单药治疗19 Gy, HDR近距离治疗15 Gy。预测局部复发的因素包括前列腺体积、显性前列腺内病变(DIL)体积、PSA密度和DIL浓缩PSA (DILcPSA)。DILcPSA定义为DIL体积范围内的PSA密度,由PSA密度乘以DIL体积计算得到。报告基线患者特征和肿瘤特征。采用Cox回归分析进行单因素和多因素分析,以确定局部复发相关因素。32例患者中位随访时间为59.2个月。患者中位年龄为70岁。大多数患者为不良至高危(19例,59.4%);然而,最常见的分级组是2级组(14例,43.7%)。大多数患者接受药物或手术阉割的雄激素剥夺治疗(ADT)(25例,78.1%)。接受HDR近距离放疗作为单药治疗的患者比例(18例,56.2%)与强化治疗(14例,43.8%)相似。从肿瘤特征来看,大部分DILs位于外周带(28例,87.
{"title":"PO73","authors":"Wiwatchai Sittiwong, Pittaya Dankulchai","doi":"10.1016/j.brachy.2023.06.174","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.brachy.2023.06.174","url":null,"abstract":"Purpose To identify a predictive factor associated with local recurrence in prostate cancer patients receiving HDR brachytherapy. Materials and Methods Localized, non-metastatic prostate cancer patients who were treated with brachytherapy with or without external beam radiation (EBRT) between January 2015 to December 2021 were retrospectively reviewed. HDR monotherapy was prescribed at 19 Gy to prostate while HDR brachytherapy was prescribed at 15 Gy to prostate after EBRT of 45-50 Gy to whole pelvis. Factors to identify a predictor of local recurrence included prostate volume, dominant intraprostatic lesion (DIL) volume, PSA density and DIL-concentrated PSA (DILcPSA). DILcPSA is defined as the PSA density within the area of DIL volume which can be calculated by PSA density multiplied by DIL volume. Baseline patient characteristics and tumor characteristics were reported. Univariate and multivariate analysis were performed to identify factors associated local recurrence by using Cox's regression analysis. Results 32 patients with the median follow up time of 59.2 months were included. The median age of patients was 70 years. Most patients were categorized as unfavorable to very high risk (19 patients, 59.4%); however, most common grade group was grade group 2 (14 patients, 43.7%). Most patients received androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) either by medication or surgical castration (25 patients, 78.1%). The proportion of patients underwent HDR brachytherapy as monotherapy (18 patients, 56.2%) was similar to as a boost (14 patients, 43.8%). For tumor characteristics, most of DILs were located at peripheral zone (28 patients, 87.5%). Median DIL volume and prostate volume were 1.13 ml (95%CI 0.78 to 1.48), and 39.4 ml (95%CI 31.38 to 47.42), respectively. Median PSA density and DILcPSA were 0.30 (95%CI 0.12 to 0.48) and 0.33 (95%CI 0.15 to 0.51), respectively. There were 9 patients developed local recurrence. The rate of 5-year local recurrence-free survival was 68.5%. Among factors selected to predict local recurrence, DILcPSA was found to be significantly associated with local recurrence for both univariate and multivariate Cox's regression analysis with HR of 2.10 (95%CI 1.12 to 27.67) p=0.035 and 2.06 (95%CI 1.09 to 27.41) p 0.039, respectively. Prostate volume, DIL volume and PSA density were found no significant correlation with local recurrence. Conclusions DILcPSA could be a potential predictive factor to predict local recurrence in prostate cancer patients receiving HDR brachytherapy. To identify a predictive factor associated with local recurrence in prostate cancer patients receiving HDR brachytherapy. Localized, non-metastatic prostate cancer patients who were treated with brachytherapy with or without external beam radiation (EBRT) between January 2015 to December 2021 were retrospectively reviewed. HDR monotherapy was prescribed at 19 Gy to prostate while HDR brachytherapy was prescribed at 15 Gy to prostate after EBRT of 45-50 Gy to wh","PeriodicalId":93914,"journal":{"name":"Brachytherapy","volume":"25 2 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"135434362","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
PO119 PO119
Pub Date : 2023-09-01 DOI: 10.1016/j.brachy.2023.06.220
Juan Wang, Zhen Gao, Hongtao Zhang, Xuemin Di
{"title":"PO119","authors":"Juan Wang, Zhen Gao, Hongtao Zhang, Xuemin Di","doi":"10.1016/j.brachy.2023.06.220","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.brachy.2023.06.220","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":93914,"journal":{"name":"Brachytherapy","volume":"23 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"135434369","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
PO16 PO16
Pub Date : 2023-09-01 DOI: 10.1016/j.brachy.2023.06.117
JUAN WANG, Jinxin zhao, Yansong Liang, Ke Xu
{"title":"PO16","authors":"JUAN WANG, Jinxin zhao, Yansong Liang, Ke Xu","doi":"10.1016/j.brachy.2023.06.117","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.brachy.2023.06.117","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":93914,"journal":{"name":"Brachytherapy","volume":"75 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"135434380","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
PO26 PO26
Pub Date : 2023-09-01 DOI: 10.1016/j.brachy.2023.06.127
Pooja Venkatesh, Juhi Purswani, Nicholas Colangelo, Sofia Perez Otero, Nicole Hindman, Stella Lymberis
Purpose Radiation toxicity to female erectile tissue, specifically the bulboclitoral apparatus, has not been previously investigated. This retrospective cohort study aims to demonstrate the feasibility of contouring the bulboclitoris (BC) and evaluate dose received by the BC in patients who underwent interstitial gynecologic brachytherapy for tumors involving the lower vagina and periurethral region. Materials and Methods Patients were treated with HDR brachytherapy between the years 2017 and 2022. All patients underwent IMRT external beam radiotherapy (EBRT) to the pelvis and bilateral inguinal region (45 Gy in 25 fractions) followed by High Dose Rate Ir-192 interstitial brachytherapy using the CT/MR M.A.C. Interstitial Gyn Template in 5 fractions for a total dose of 25 Gy (range, 22.5 - 27.5 Gy). The bulboclitoris (BC) was contoured retrospectively by a radiation oncologist and a pelvic radiologist using T2 MRI sequences fused to the pre-treatment and brachytherapy CT simulation. Superiorly, the BC was defined as inferior to the pubic symphysis and attached to the suspensory ligament of the clitoris. Laterally, the crura extend on either side of the corpus. Inferiorly, the vestibular bulbs flank the urethra and vagina on either side and do not extend posteriorly beyond the vagina. A representative contour of the bulboclitoral apparatus is depicted in Figure 1. Dosimetric data for the BC were calculated using EQD2 assuming an alpha-beta ratio of 3 Gy. Median follow up, local control, and vaginal morbidity using CTCAE version 4.0 for vaginal stenosis and pain scoring of the BC was evaluated. Results Patients had a median age of 65 years (range, 49-73). Three of the five patients had a diagnosis of squamous cell carcinoma of the vagina, one patient had recurrent cervical cancer in the vagina, and one patient had endometrioid adenocarcinoma involving the vagina. All tumors were located in the lower vagina, near the BC and urethra. The high-risk clinical target volume (HR-CTV), bladder, rectum, and urethra were contoured on patient imaging during initial treatment planning. Mean D90 of the HR-CTV was 79.82 Gy (range, 72.2-89.9 Gy), mean D2cc to the bladder was 66.54 Gy (range, 50.0-87.2 Gy), mean D2cc to the rectum was 60.9 Gy (range, 46.9-72.9), and mean D0.1cc to the urethra was 79.28 Gy (range, 53.9-93 Gy). At a median follow up of 19.6 months, all patients had a complete local response. One patient had systemic progression and died of metastatic disease. The mean pre-treatment volume of the bulboclitoris was 16.6 cc (range, 11.9 - 20.9 cc) and at brachytherapy was 12.66 cc (range, 7.3 - 22.1 cc). The mean IMRT dose to the BC was 45.87 Gy (range, 44.79 - 46.66 Gy) and mean HDR dose was 14.02 Gy (range, 11.23 - 18.88 Gy). Assuming an alpha-beta ratio of 3 Gy, mean bulboclitoral D90 EQD2 was 62.93 Gy (range of 58.72 to 67.22 Gy). In the acute period, all patients reported severe pain in the clitoral glans region and dysuria that completely resolved
目的辐射对女性勃起组织,特别是球阴蒂器官的毒性,以前没有研究过。本回顾性队列研究的目的是证明球囊阴蒂(BC)轮廓化的可行性,并评估接受阴道下段和尿道周围肿瘤间质性妇科近距离放射治疗的患者所接受的BC剂量。材料与方法患者于2017 - 2022年接受HDR近距离放疗。所有患者均接受骨盆和双侧腹股沟区域的IMRT外束放疗(EBRT) (45 Gy,分25次),随后采用CT/MR M.A.C.间质Gyn模板进行高剂量率Ir-192间质近距离放疗,分5次,总剂量为25 Gy(范围22.5 - 27.5 Gy)。由放射肿瘤学家和骨盆放射科医生使用T2 MRI序列融合治疗前和近距离治疗CT模拟对球囊阴蒂(BC)进行回顾性轮廓。上,BC被定义为在耻骨联合下方,附着于阴蒂悬韧带。从侧面看,脚在躯干两侧延伸。在下方,前庭球位于尿道和阴道两侧,不向后延伸到阴道以外。球阴蒂器官的代表性轮廓如图1所示。使用EQD2计算BC的剂量学数据,假设α - β比为3 Gy。使用CTCAE 4.0版本评估阴道狭窄和BC疼痛评分,评估中位随访、局部对照和阴道发病率。结果患者中位年龄为65岁(49-73岁)。5名患者中有3名被诊断为阴道鳞状细胞癌,1名患者患有阴道复发性宫颈癌,1名患者患有累及阴道的子宫内膜样腺癌。所有肿瘤均位于阴道下部,靠近BC和尿道。高危临床靶体积(HR-CTV)、膀胱、直肠和尿道在初始治疗计划期间通过患者成像进行轮廓。HR-CTV平均D90为79.82 Gy(范围:72.2 ~ 89.9 Gy),膀胱平均D2cc为66.54 Gy(范围:50.0 ~ 87.2 Gy),直肠平均D2cc为60.9 Gy(范围:46.9 ~ 72.9),尿道平均D0.1cc为79.28 Gy(范围:53.9 ~ 93 Gy)。在中位19.6个月的随访中,所有患者都有完全的局部缓解。一名患者出现全身进展并死于转移性疾病。球阴蒂治疗前平均体积为16.6 cc(范围,11.9 - 20.9 cc),近距离治疗时平均体积为12.66 cc(范围,7.3 - 22.1 cc)。对BC的平均IMRT剂量为45.87 Gy(范围,44.79 ~ 46.66 Gy),平均HDR剂量为14.02 Gy(范围,11.23 ~ 18.88 Gy)。假设α - β比值为3 Gy,球阴蒂平均D90 EQD2为62.93 Gy(范围为58.72 ~ 67.22 Gy)。在急性期,所有患者均报告阴蒂头区剧烈疼痛和排尿困难,2年后完全缓解。尽管使用了阴道扩张器,但所有患者仍发生1-2级阴道狭窄。一名患者报告放疗后5个月阴蒂敏感性下降,无法达到阴蒂介导性高潮。结论在妇科近距离放射治疗中,阴蒂包膜是可行的,而阴蒂包膜受到的辐射剂量较大,可引起阴蒂疼痛和功能障碍。需要进一步的研究来评估球阴蒂的剂量反应,并探索在放射治疗中保留该器官的方法,以尽量减少毒性并保持性功能。辐射对女性勃起组织的毒性,特别是球阴蒂器官,以前没有研究过。本回顾性队列研究的目的是证明球囊阴蒂(BC)轮廓化的可行性,并评估接受阴道下段和尿道周围肿瘤间质性妇科近距离放射治疗的患者所接受的BC剂量。患者在2017年至2022年期间接受HDR近距离放疗。所有患者均接受骨盆和双侧腹股沟区域的IMRT外束放疗(EBRT) (45 Gy,分25次),随后采用CT/MR M.A.C.间质Gyn模板进行高剂量率Ir-192间质近距离放疗,分5次,总剂量为25 Gy(范围22.5 - 27.5 Gy)。由放射肿瘤学家和骨盆放射科医生使用T2 MRI序列融合治疗前和近距离治疗CT模拟对球囊阴蒂(BC)进行回顾性轮廓。上,BC被定义为在耻骨联合下方,附着于阴蒂悬韧带。从侧面看,脚在躯干两侧延伸。在下方,前庭球位于尿道和阴道两侧,不向后延伸到阴道以外。 球阴蒂器官的代表性轮廓如图1所示。使用EQD2计算BC的剂量学数据,假设α - β比为3 Gy。使用CTCAE 4.0版本评估阴道狭窄和BC疼痛评分,评估中位随访、局部对照和阴道发病率。患者的中位年龄为65岁(49-73岁)。5名患者中有3名被诊断为阴道鳞状细胞癌,1名患者患有阴道复发性宫颈癌,1名患者患有累及阴道的子宫内膜样腺癌。所有肿瘤均位于阴道下部,靠近BC和尿道。高危临床靶体积(HR-CTV)、膀胱、直肠和尿道在初始治疗计划期间通过患者成像进行轮廓。HR-CTV平均D90为79.82 Gy(范围:72.2 ~ 89.9 Gy),膀胱平均D2cc为66.54 Gy(范围:50.0 ~ 87.2 Gy),直肠平均D2cc为60.9 Gy(范围:46.9 ~ 72.9),尿道平均D0.1cc为79.28 Gy(范围:53.9 ~ 93 Gy)。在中位19.6个月的随访中,所有患者都有完全的局部缓解。一名患者出现全身进展并死于转移性疾病。球阴蒂治疗前平均体积为16.6 cc(范围,11.9 - 20.9 cc),近距离治疗时平均体积为12.66 cc(范围,7.3 - 22.1 cc)。对BC的平均IMRT剂量为45.87 Gy(范围,44.79 ~ 46.66 Gy),平均HDR剂量为14.02 Gy(范围,11.23 ~ 18.88 Gy)。假设α - β比值为3 Gy,球阴蒂平均D90 EQD2为62.93 Gy(范围为58.72 ~ 67.22 Gy)。在急性期,所有患者均报告阴蒂头区剧烈疼痛和排尿困难,2年后完全缓解。尽管使用了阴道扩张器,但所有患者仍发生1-2级阴道狭窄。一名患者报告放疗后5个月阴蒂敏感性下降,无法达到阴蒂介导性高潮。本研究表明,轮廓球阴蒂是可行的,并且BC在妇科近距离放射治疗中接受显著的辐射剂量,可引起阴蒂疼痛和功能障碍。需要进一步的研究来评估球阴蒂的剂量反应,并探索在放射治疗中保留该器官的方法,以尽量减少毒性并保持性功能。 球阴蒂器官的代表性轮廓如图1所示。使用EQD2计算BC的剂量学数据,假设α - β比为3 Gy。使用CTCAE 4.0版本评估阴道狭窄和BC疼痛评分,评估中位随访、局部对照和阴道发病率。患者的中位年龄为65岁(49-73岁)。5名患者中有3名被诊断为阴道鳞状细胞癌,1名患者患有阴道复发性宫颈癌,1名患者患有累及阴道的子宫内膜样腺癌。所有肿瘤均位于阴道下部,靠近BC和尿道。高危临床靶体积(HR-CTV)、膀胱、直肠和尿道在初始治疗计划期间通过患者成像进行轮廓。HR-CTV平均D90为79.82 Gy(范围:72.2 ~ 89.9 Gy),膀胱平均D2cc为66.54 Gy(范围:50.0 ~ 87.2 Gy),直肠平均D2cc为60.9 Gy(范围:46.9 ~ 72.9),尿道平均D0.1cc为79.28 Gy(范围:53.9 ~ 93 Gy)。在中位19.6个月的随访中,所有患者都有完全的局部缓解。一名患者出现全身进展并死于转移性疾病。球阴蒂治疗前平均体积为16.6 cc(范围,11.9 - 20.9 cc),近距离治疗时平均体积为12.66 cc(范围,7.3 - 22.1 cc)。对BC的平均IMRT剂量为45.87 Gy(范围,44.79 ~ 46.66 Gy),平均HDR剂量为14.02 Gy(范围,11.2
{"title":"PO26","authors":"Pooja Venkatesh, Juhi Purswani, Nicholas Colangelo, Sofia Perez Otero, Nicole Hindman, Stella Lymberis","doi":"10.1016/j.brachy.2023.06.127","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.brachy.2023.06.127","url":null,"abstract":"Purpose Radiation toxicity to female erectile tissue, specifically the bulboclitoral apparatus, has not been previously investigated. This retrospective cohort study aims to demonstrate the feasibility of contouring the bulboclitoris (BC) and evaluate dose received by the BC in patients who underwent interstitial gynecologic brachytherapy for tumors involving the lower vagina and periurethral region. Materials and Methods Patients were treated with HDR brachytherapy between the years 2017 and 2022. All patients underwent IMRT external beam radiotherapy (EBRT) to the pelvis and bilateral inguinal region (45 Gy in 25 fractions) followed by High Dose Rate Ir-192 interstitial brachytherapy using the CT/MR M.A.C. Interstitial Gyn Template in 5 fractions for a total dose of 25 Gy (range, 22.5 - 27.5 Gy). The bulboclitoris (BC) was contoured retrospectively by a radiation oncologist and a pelvic radiologist using T2 MRI sequences fused to the pre-treatment and brachytherapy CT simulation. Superiorly, the BC was defined as inferior to the pubic symphysis and attached to the suspensory ligament of the clitoris. Laterally, the crura extend on either side of the corpus. Inferiorly, the vestibular bulbs flank the urethra and vagina on either side and do not extend posteriorly beyond the vagina. A representative contour of the bulboclitoral apparatus is depicted in Figure 1. Dosimetric data for the BC were calculated using EQD2 assuming an alpha-beta ratio of 3 Gy. Median follow up, local control, and vaginal morbidity using CTCAE version 4.0 for vaginal stenosis and pain scoring of the BC was evaluated. Results Patients had a median age of 65 years (range, 49-73). Three of the five patients had a diagnosis of squamous cell carcinoma of the vagina, one patient had recurrent cervical cancer in the vagina, and one patient had endometrioid adenocarcinoma involving the vagina. All tumors were located in the lower vagina, near the BC and urethra. The high-risk clinical target volume (HR-CTV), bladder, rectum, and urethra were contoured on patient imaging during initial treatment planning. Mean D90 of the HR-CTV was 79.82 Gy (range, 72.2-89.9 Gy), mean D2cc to the bladder was 66.54 Gy (range, 50.0-87.2 Gy), mean D2cc to the rectum was 60.9 Gy (range, 46.9-72.9), and mean D0.1cc to the urethra was 79.28 Gy (range, 53.9-93 Gy). At a median follow up of 19.6 months, all patients had a complete local response. One patient had systemic progression and died of metastatic disease. The mean pre-treatment volume of the bulboclitoris was 16.6 cc (range, 11.9 - 20.9 cc) and at brachytherapy was 12.66 cc (range, 7.3 - 22.1 cc). The mean IMRT dose to the BC was 45.87 Gy (range, 44.79 - 46.66 Gy) and mean HDR dose was 14.02 Gy (range, 11.23 - 18.88 Gy). Assuming an alpha-beta ratio of 3 Gy, mean bulboclitoral D90 EQD2 was 62.93 Gy (range of 58.72 to 67.22 Gy). In the acute period, all patients reported severe pain in the clitoral glans region and dysuria that completely resolved","PeriodicalId":93914,"journal":{"name":"Brachytherapy","volume":"60 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"135434382","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
PO83 PO83
Pub Date : 2023-09-01 DOI: 10.1016/j.brachy.2023.06.184
Christopher Jason Tien, Emily Draeger, Fada Guan, David J. Carlson, Zhe Jay Chen
Purpose In order to develop a robust universal model which can accurately predict tumor control probability (TCP), it is necessary to first explore the sensitivity of the model on its input radiobiological parameters. We propose a methodology to derive population-averaged values of TCP based on a computational “clinical trial” with an enrollment of virtual patients orders of magnitude larger than physically-achievable cohort sizes (∼1 million), each with precisely-known radiobiological parameter values. Materials and Methods Each virtual patient was randomly assigned α and α/β values following a randomized distribution based on a previous study by Wang et al, endorsed by AAPM TG137 and TG265: α to a log-normal distribution function with mean (µ) of 0.15 Gy-1 and standard deviation (σ) of 0.04 Gy-1; α/β to a Gaussian function with µ=3.1 Gy and σ= 0.5 Gy; the initial clonogenic population was a fixed value of 1.6 x 106 (low-risk patient cohort). Next, after establishing the cohort, the TCP was calculated for each patient using the linear-quadratic (LQ) model assuming Poisson statistics for a range of doses from 0 to 140 Gy. The fractional TCP value was compared against a random number generator value to ultimately determine the binary patient outcome (i.e. TCP or fail). This process was repeated for each patient in the trial and the final population-based TCP was calculated by the ratio of successes to the number of patients in the trial. A series of new trials was created with one million patients to test α and α/β dependence with intentional variations in α or α/β values for α values from 0.7 to 0.23 Gy-1 and α/β values from 1.5 to 5.0 Gy. Results A series of 11 TCP curves was generated. For each curve, one million patients were created and assigned values of α, α/β. For the reference cohort using both the Gaussian and log-normal functions, the TCP90% and TCP50% were 89.4 and 68.9 Gy. With only a fixed log-normal α function, TCP90% was 70.3, 84.3, 89.4, 93.1, 101 Gy and TCP50% was 56.4, 65.9, 69.6, 71.8, 77.7 Gy for α/β=1.5, 2.6, 3.1, 3.6, 5 Gy, respectively. With only a fixed Gaussian α/β function, TCP90% was 126.1, 92.3, 74.0, 62.3 53.5 and TCP50% was 114.3, 89.8, 67.4, 56.4, 48.3 Gy for α=0.07, 0.11, 0.15, 0.19, 0.23 Gy-1, respectively. As illustrated in the Figure, larger values of α or smaller α/β ratios shift the TCP curve to lower TCP90% and TCP50%. Additionally, choosing a distribution of α values centered on 0.15 Gy-1 rather than a fixed α=0.15 Gy-1 significantly flattens the slope of the TCP curve, while using a distribution of α/β values produced indistinguishable TCP curves. Conclusions By leveraging the Law of Large Numbers and raw computing power, we were able to create multiple heterogeneous cohorts each containing 1 million virtual patients to generate realistic TCP curves based on previously published distributions of plausible α and α/β values, such as those endorsed by AAPM TG137 and TG265. This virtual clinical trial was able
目的为了建立一种能够准确预测肿瘤控制概率(TCP)的鲁棒通用模型,有必要首先探讨该模型对其输入的放射生物学参数的敏感性。我们提出了一种基于计算“临床试验”的方法来推导TCP的总体平均值,该试验的虚拟患者人数比物理可实现的队列规模(约100万)大几个数量级,每个患者都具有精确已知的放射生物学参数值。材料与方法根据Wang等人的前期研究,并经AAPM TG137和TG265认可,随机分配每个虚拟患者的α和α/β值:α服从对数正态分布函数,平均值(µ)为0.15 Gy-1,标准差(σ)为0.04 Gy-1;α/β为高斯函数,µ=3.1 Gy, σ= 0.5 Gy;初始克隆人群为固定值1.6 x 106(低危患者队列)。接下来,在建立队列后,使用线性二次(LQ)模型计算每个患者的TCP,假设剂量范围为0至140 Gy的泊松统计。将分数TCP值与随机数生成器值进行比较,以最终确定二进制患者结果(即TCP或失败)。该过程在试验中的每个患者中重复进行,最终基于人群的TCP由试验中成功率与患者数量的比率计算。在α值从0.7 Gy-1到0.23 Gy-1和α/β值从1.5 Gy- 5.0 Gy-1之间有意改变α或α/β值的情况下,对100万名患者进行了一系列新的试验,以测试α和α/β依赖性。结果共生成了11条TCP曲线。对于每条曲线,创建100万例患者,并分配α, α/β值。对于使用高斯和对数正态函数的参考队列,TCP90%和TCP50%分别为89.4和68.9 Gy。当α/β=1.5、2.6、3.1、3.6、5 Gy时,TCP90%分别为70.3、84.3、89.4、93.1、101 Gy, TCP50%分别为56.4、65.9、69.6、71.8、77.7 Gy。当α=0.07、0.11、0.15、0.19、0.23 Gy-1时,TCP90%分别为126.1、92.3、74.0、62.3、53.5,TCP50%分别为114.3、89.8、67.4、56.4、48.3 Gy。如图所示,较大的α值或较小的α/β比值使TCP曲线向较低的TCP90%和TCP50%移动。此外,选择以0.15 Gy-1为中心的α值分布,而不是固定的α=0.15 Gy-1,可以使TCP曲线的斜率显著变平,而使用α/β值分布会产生难以区分的TCP曲线。利用大数定律和原始计算能力,我们能够创建多个异构队列,每个队列包含100万虚拟患者,并基于先前发表的可信α和α/β值分布生成真实的TCP曲线,例如AAPM TG137和TG265认可的分布。该虚拟临床试验能够提取出总体平均分数TCP。该框架可以通过系统地改变输入模型参数来测试TCP模型的灵敏度。这种方法特别有前途,因为只要患者队列的规模增加到足以满足统计要求,它就可以同时处理更多的放射生物学参数。为了建立能够准确预测肿瘤控制概率(TCP)的鲁棒通用模型,首先需要探索模型对其输入的放射生物学参数的敏感性。我们提出了一种基于计算“临床试验”的方法来推导TCP的总体平均值,该试验的虚拟患者人数比物理可实现的队列规模(约100万)大几个数量级,每个患者都具有精确已知的放射生物学参数值。每个虚拟患者随机分配α和α/β值,其随机分布基于Wang等人的前期研究,并得到AAPM TG137和TG265的认可:α服从对数正态分布函数,平均值(µ)为0.15 Gy-1,标准差(σ)为0.04 Gy-1;α/β为高斯函数,µ=3.1 Gy, σ= 0.5 Gy;初始克隆人群为固定值1.6 x 106(低危患者队列)。接下来,在建立队列后,使用线性二次(LQ)模型计算每个患者的TCP,假设剂量范围为0至140 Gy的泊松统计。将分数TCP值与随机数生成器值进行比较,以最终确定二进制患者结果(即TCP或失败)。该过程在试验中的每个患者中重复进行,最终基于人群的TCP由试验中成功率与患者数量的比率计算。在100万名患者中进行了一系列新的试验,以测试α和α/β依赖性,并在α值从0.7到0之间有意改变α或α/β值。 目的为了建立一种能够准确预测肿瘤控制概率(TCP)的鲁棒通用模型,有必要首先探讨该模型对其输入的放射生物学参数的敏感性。我们提出了一种基于计算“临床试验”的方法来推导TCP的总体平均值,该试验的虚拟患者人数比物理可实现的队列规模(约100万)大几个数量级,每个患者都具有精确已知的放射生物学参数值。材料与方法根据Wang等人的前期研究,并经AAPM TG137和TG265认可,随机分配每个虚拟患者的α和α/β值:α服从对数正态分布函数,平均值(µ)为0.15 Gy-1,标准差(σ)为0.04 Gy-1;α/β为高斯函数,µ=3.1 Gy, σ= 0.5 Gy;初始克隆人群为固定值1.6 x 106(低危患者队列)。接下来,在建立队列后,使用线性二次(LQ)模型计算每个患者的TCP,假设剂量范围为0至140 Gy的泊松统计。将分数TCP值与随机数生成器值进行比较,以最终确定二进制患者结果(即TCP或失败)。该过程在试验中的每个患者中重复进行,最终基于人群的TCP由试验中成功率与患者数量的比率计算。在α值从0.7 Gy-1到0.23 Gy-1和α/β值从1.5 Gy- 5.0 Gy-1之间有意改变α或α/β值的情况下,对100万名患者进行了一系列新的试验,以测试α和α/β依赖性。结果共生成了11条TCP曲线。对于每条曲线,创建100万例患者,并分配α, α/β值。对于使用高斯和对数正态函数的参考队列,TCP90%和TCP50%分别为89.4和68.9 Gy。当α/β=1.5、2.6、3.1、3.6、5 Gy时,TCP90%分别为70.3、84.3、89.4、93.1、101 Gy, TCP50%分别为56.4、65.9、69.6、71.8、77.7 Gy。当α=0.07、0.11、0.15、0.19、0.23 Gy-1时,TCP90%分别为126.1、92.3、74.0、62.3、53.5,TCP50%分别为114.3、89.8、67.4、56.4、48.3 Gy。如图所示,较大的α值或较小的α/β比值使TCP曲线向较低的TCP90%和TCP50%移动。此外,选择以0.15 Gy-1为中心的α值分布,而不是固定的α=0.15 Gy-1,可以使TCP曲线的斜率显著变平,而使用α/β值分布会产生难以区分的TCP曲线。利用大数定律和原始计算能力,我们能够创建多个异构队列,每个队列包含100万虚拟患者,并基于先前发表的可信α和α/β值分布生成真实的TCP曲线,例如AAPM TG137和TG265认可的分布。该虚拟临床试验能够提取出总体平均分数TCP。该框架可以通过系统地改变输入模型参数来测试TCP模型的灵敏度。这种方法特别有前途,因为只要患者队列的规模增加到足以满足统计要求,它就可以同时处理更多的放射生物学参数。为了建立能够准确预测肿瘤控制概率(TCP)的鲁棒通用模型,首先需要探索模型对其输入的放射生物学参数的敏感性。我们提出了一种基于计算“临床试验”的方法来推导TCP的总体平均值,该试验的虚拟患者人数比物理可实现的队列规模(约100万)大几个数量级,每个患者都具有精确已知的放射生物学参数值。每个虚拟患者随机分配α和α
{"title":"PO83","authors":"Christopher Jason Tien, Emily Draeger, Fada Guan, David J. Carlson, Zhe Jay Chen","doi":"10.1016/j.brachy.2023.06.184","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.brachy.2023.06.184","url":null,"abstract":"Purpose In order to develop a robust universal model which can accurately predict tumor control probability (TCP), it is necessary to first explore the sensitivity of the model on its input radiobiological parameters. We propose a methodology to derive population-averaged values of TCP based on a computational “clinical trial” with an enrollment of virtual patients orders of magnitude larger than physically-achievable cohort sizes (∼1 million), each with precisely-known radiobiological parameter values. Materials and Methods Each virtual patient was randomly assigned α and α/β values following a randomized distribution based on a previous study by Wang et al, endorsed by AAPM TG137 and TG265: α to a log-normal distribution function with mean (µ) of 0.15 Gy-1 and standard deviation (σ) of 0.04 Gy-1; α/β to a Gaussian function with µ=3.1 Gy and σ= 0.5 Gy; the initial clonogenic population was a fixed value of 1.6 x 106 (low-risk patient cohort). Next, after establishing the cohort, the TCP was calculated for each patient using the linear-quadratic (LQ) model assuming Poisson statistics for a range of doses from 0 to 140 Gy. The fractional TCP value was compared against a random number generator value to ultimately determine the binary patient outcome (i.e. TCP or fail). This process was repeated for each patient in the trial and the final population-based TCP was calculated by the ratio of successes to the number of patients in the trial. A series of new trials was created with one million patients to test α and α/β dependence with intentional variations in α or α/β values for α values from 0.7 to 0.23 Gy-1 and α/β values from 1.5 to 5.0 Gy. Results A series of 11 TCP curves was generated. For each curve, one million patients were created and assigned values of α, α/β. For the reference cohort using both the Gaussian and log-normal functions, the TCP90% and TCP50% were 89.4 and 68.9 Gy. With only a fixed log-normal α function, TCP90% was 70.3, 84.3, 89.4, 93.1, 101 Gy and TCP50% was 56.4, 65.9, 69.6, 71.8, 77.7 Gy for α/β=1.5, 2.6, 3.1, 3.6, 5 Gy, respectively. With only a fixed Gaussian α/β function, TCP90% was 126.1, 92.3, 74.0, 62.3 53.5 and TCP50% was 114.3, 89.8, 67.4, 56.4, 48.3 Gy for α=0.07, 0.11, 0.15, 0.19, 0.23 Gy-1, respectively. As illustrated in the Figure, larger values of α or smaller α/β ratios shift the TCP curve to lower TCP90% and TCP50%. Additionally, choosing a distribution of α values centered on 0.15 Gy-1 rather than a fixed α=0.15 Gy-1 significantly flattens the slope of the TCP curve, while using a distribution of α/β values produced indistinguishable TCP curves. Conclusions By leveraging the Law of Large Numbers and raw computing power, we were able to create multiple heterogeneous cohorts each containing 1 million virtual patients to generate realistic TCP curves based on previously published distributions of plausible α and α/β values, such as those endorsed by AAPM TG137 and TG265. This virtual clinical trial was able ","PeriodicalId":93914,"journal":{"name":"Brachytherapy","volume":"43 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"135434413","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
PO108 PO108
Pub Date : 2023-09-01 DOI: 10.1016/j.brachy.2023.06.209
Ke Xu
{"title":"PO108","authors":"Ke Xu","doi":"10.1016/j.brachy.2023.06.209","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.brachy.2023.06.209","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":93914,"journal":{"name":"Brachytherapy","volume":"24 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"135434425","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
PO08 PO08
Pub Date : 2023-09-01 DOI: 10.1016/j.brachy.2023.06.109
Jill Bennett, Cédric Bélanger, Philippe Chatigny, Luc Beaulieu, Alexandra Rink
Purpose Brachytherapy (BT) is an essential pillar in the treatment of cervical cancer. One method of gynecological (GYN) BT uses a transperineal catheter-guiding template in combination with an intrauterine (IU) tandem. Typically, catheter locations are decided using pre-BT imaging, and radiation treatment plans are then determined based on imaging taken after catheter insertion. Due to changes in patient anatomy once the IU tandem is inserted, this approach can lead to suboptimal tumor coverage, and often unused catheters, which contribute to increased implantation time, unnecessary tissue injury, and increased risk of bleeds. Images taken after insertion of the Template and APPlicator (post-TAPP) used in conjunction with a simple geometric catheter placement optimization algorithm may result in fewer unused catheters with better or equivalent dosimetry. In previous studies on prostate BT, the use of a Centroidal Voronoi Tessellation (CVT) algorithm for catheter optimization led to equivalent or superior treatment plans using fewer IS catheters compared to clinical cases. This work aims to verify these findings for cervical cancer BT. Materials and Methods Cases of locally advanced cervical cancer treated from 2016 to 2020 using IS BT with a Syed Neblett template were selected (N=12). Post-insertion imaging with target, organ-at-risk (OAR), and clinical catheter delineations were retrieved from the first BT fraction for each patient. CVT was used to simulate post-TAPP optimized catheters for each case by uniformly distributing catheters throughout a 2D projection of the target volume. The number of catheters in the CVT arrangement was equal to the number of catheters in the clinical implant, or the number of available template positions in the CVT planning region (defined as the high risk clinical target volume [HR-CTV] minus OARs projected onto the template plane), whichever number was lower. Treatment plans were then manually generated by a single expert for both the CVT and clinical catheter arrangements. Plan acceptability was evaluated via compliance with the EMBRACE-II dose-volume histogram limits in equieffective dose in 2 Gy per fraction (EQD2). Measures of dose inhomogeneity (%V150HR-CTV and %V200HR-CTV) were also recorded. Results The mean time for catheter optimization using CVT was 11.49 s. In all cases but 1, the CVT arrangements led to improved or EMBRACE-II compliant treatment plans with as many or fewer inserted catheters compared to the clinical cases (Figure 1). An increase in mean D90HR-CTV, D98HR-CTV, and D98IR-CTV was observed in the CVT group compared to the clinical group, as well as a statistically significant 2.2 Gy increase in mean D98GTVres (p < 0.05). A 2.2% increase in mean %V150HR-CTV was observed in the CVT group (p < 0.05). The mean number of unused catheters decreased from 4 in the clinical plans to 0 in the CVT plans (p < 0.001), and the acceptability rate increased from 50% with clinical catheters to 66.67% wit
目的近距离放射治疗(BT)是宫颈癌治疗的重要支柱。妇科(GYN) BT的一种方法是使用经会阴导管引导模板与宫内(IU)串联相结合。通常,使用bt前成像确定导管位置,然后根据导管插入后的成像确定放射治疗计划。一旦插入IU串联,由于患者解剖结构的变化,这种方法可能导致肿瘤覆盖不理想,并且经常使用未使用的导管,从而增加植入时间,不必要的组织损伤和出血风险。在模板和应用器(tapp后)插入后拍摄的图像与简单的几何导管放置优化算法结合使用,可以减少未使用的导管,并具有更好或等效的剂量学。在先前的前列腺BT研究中,使用质心Voronoi Tessellation (CVT)算法进行导管优化,与临床病例相比,使用较少的IS导管可获得同等或更好的治疗方案。材料与方法选择2016 - 2020年采用IS BT联合Syed Neblett模板治疗的局部晚期宫颈癌病例(N=12)。从每个患者的第一个BT分数中检索插入后的靶器官、危险器官(OAR)和临床导管描绘。CVT通过在目标容积的二维投影中均匀分布导管来模拟每个病例tapp优化后的导管。CVT布置中的导管数量等于临床植入物中的导管数量,或CVT规划区域(定义为高风险临床靶体积[HR-CTV]减去模板平面上投影的桨)中可用模板位置的数量,以较低者为准。然后由一名专家手动生成CVT和临床导管布置的治疗计划。计划的可接受性通过遵守恩拜拉- ii剂量-体积直方图限制(每组分2 Gy的等有效剂量)来评估。剂量不均匀性测量(%V150HR-CTV和%V200HR-CTV)也被记录。结果CVT优化导管的平均时间为11.49 s。除1例外,所有病例均采用CVT安排,与临床病例相比,CVT组的平均D90HR-CTV、D98HR-CTV和D98IR-CTV均增加,与临床组相比,平均D98GTVres增加2.2 Gy,具有统计学意义(p < 0.05)。CVT组平均%V150HR-CTV升高2.2% (p < 0.05)。平均未使用导管数由临床方案的4个减少到CVT方案的0个(p < 0.001),导管的接受率由临床方案的50%提高到CVT方案的66.67%。结论本回顾性研究支持以下假设:在使用IU和Syed Neblett模板限制宫颈病例外置导管插入的同时,tapp后成像CVT可以达到临床可接受的剂量测定。未来的工作将增加队列规模,并进一步量化降低CVT导管数量的效果。近距离放射治疗(BT)是宫颈癌治疗的重要支柱。妇科(GYN) BT的一种方法是使用经会阴导管引导模板与宫内(IU)串联相结合。通常,使用bt前成像确定导管位置,然后根据导管插入后的成像确定放射治疗计划。一旦插入IU串联,由于患者解剖结构的变化,这种方法可能导致肿瘤覆盖不理想,并且经常使用未使用的导管,从而增加植入时间,不必要的组织损伤和出血风险。在模板和应用器(tapp后)插入后拍摄的图像与简单的几何导管放置优化算法结合使用,可以减少未使用的导管,并具有更好或等效的剂量学。在先前的前列腺BT研究中,使用质心Voronoi Tessellation (CVT)算法进行导管优化,与临床病例相比,使用较少的IS导管可获得同等或更好的治疗方案。本研究选取2016 - 2020年使用IS BT结合Syed Neblett模板治疗的局部晚期宫颈癌病例(N=12)。从每个患者的第一个BT分数中检索插入后的靶器官、危险器官(OAR)和临床导管描绘。CVT通过在目标容积的二维投影中均匀分布导管来模拟每个病例tapp优化后的导管。 目的近距离放射治疗(BT)是宫颈癌治疗的重要支柱。妇科(GYN) BT的一种方法是使用经会阴导管引导模板与宫内(IU)串联相结合。通常,使用bt前成像确定导管位置,然后根据导管插入后的成像确定放射治疗计划。一旦插入IU串联,由于患者解剖结构的变化,这种方法可能导致肿瘤覆盖不理想,并且经常使用未使用的导管,从而增加植入时间,不必要的组织损伤和出血风险。在模板和应用器(tapp后)插入后拍摄的图像与简单的几何导管放置优化算法结合使用,可以减少未使用的导管,并具有更好或等效的剂量学。在先前的前列腺BT研究中,使用质心Voronoi Tessellation (CVT)算法进行导管优化,与临床病例相比,使用较少的IS导管可获得同等或更好的治疗方案。材料与方法选择2016 - 2020年采用IS BT联合Syed Neblett模板治疗的局部晚期宫颈癌病例(N=12)。从每个患者的第一个BT分数中检索插入后的靶器官、危险器官(OAR)和临床导管描绘。CVT通过在目标容积的二维投影中均匀分布导管来模拟每个病例tapp优化后的导管。CVT布置中的导管数量等于临床植入物中的导管数量,或CVT规划区域(定义为高风险临床靶体积[HR-CTV]减去模板平面上投影的桨)中可用模板位置的数量,以较低者为准。然后由一名专家手动生成CVT和临床导管布置的治疗计划。计划的可接受性通过遵守恩拜拉- ii剂量-体积直方图限制(每组分2 Gy的等有效剂量)来评估。剂量不均匀性测量(%V150HR-CTV和%V200HR-CTV)也被记录。结果CVT优化导管的平均时间为11.49 s。除1例外,所有病例均采用CVT安排,与临床病例相比,CVT组的平均D90HR-CTV、D98HR-CTV和D98IR-CTV均增加,与临床组相比,平均D98GTVres增加2.2 Gy,具有统计学意义(p < 0.05)。CVT组平均%V150HR-CTV升高2.2% (p < 0.05)。平均未使用导管数由临床方案的4个减少到CVT方案的0个(p < 0.001),导管的接受率由临床方案的50%提高到CVT方案的66.67%。结论本回顾性研究支持以下假设:在使用IU和Syed Neblett模板限制宫颈病例外置导管插入的同时,tapp后成像CVT可以达到临床可接受的剂量测定。未来的工作将增加队列规模,并进一步量化降低CVT导管数量的效果。近距离放射治疗(BT)是宫颈癌治疗的重要支柱。妇科(GYN) BT的一种方法是使用经会阴导管引导模板与宫内(IU)串联相结合。通常,使用bt前成像确定导管位置,然后根据导管插入后的成像确定放射治疗计划。一旦插入IU串联,由于患者解剖结构的变化,这种方法可能导致肿瘤覆盖不理想,并且经常使用未使用的导管,从而增加植入时间,不必要的组织损伤和出血风险。在模板和应用器(tapp后)插入后拍摄的图像与简单的几何导管放置优化算法结合使用,可以减少未使用的导管,并具有更好或等效的剂量学。在先前的前列腺BT研究中,使用质心Voronoi Tessellation (CVT)算法进行导管优化,与临床病例相比,使用较少的IS导管可获得同等或更好的治疗方案。本研究选取2016 - 2020年使用IS BT结合Syed Neblett模板治疗的局部晚期宫颈癌病例(N=12)。从每个患者的第一个BT分数中检索插入后的靶器官、危险器官(OAR)和临床导管描绘。CVT通过在目标容积的二维投影中均匀分布导管来模拟每个病例tapp优化后的导管。 CVT布置中的导管数量等于临床植入物中的导管数量,或CVT规划区域(定义为高风险
{"title":"PO08","authors":"Jill Bennett, Cédric Bélanger, Philippe Chatigny, Luc Beaulieu, Alexandra Rink","doi":"10.1016/j.brachy.2023.06.109","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.brachy.2023.06.109","url":null,"abstract":"Purpose Brachytherapy (BT) is an essential pillar in the treatment of cervical cancer. One method of gynecological (GYN) BT uses a transperineal catheter-guiding template in combination with an intrauterine (IU) tandem. Typically, catheter locations are decided using pre-BT imaging, and radiation treatment plans are then determined based on imaging taken after catheter insertion. Due to changes in patient anatomy once the IU tandem is inserted, this approach can lead to suboptimal tumor coverage, and often unused catheters, which contribute to increased implantation time, unnecessary tissue injury, and increased risk of bleeds. Images taken after insertion of the Template and APPlicator (post-TAPP) used in conjunction with a simple geometric catheter placement optimization algorithm may result in fewer unused catheters with better or equivalent dosimetry. In previous studies on prostate BT, the use of a Centroidal Voronoi Tessellation (CVT) algorithm for catheter optimization led to equivalent or superior treatment plans using fewer IS catheters compared to clinical cases. This work aims to verify these findings for cervical cancer BT. Materials and Methods Cases of locally advanced cervical cancer treated from 2016 to 2020 using IS BT with a Syed Neblett template were selected (N=12). Post-insertion imaging with target, organ-at-risk (OAR), and clinical catheter delineations were retrieved from the first BT fraction for each patient. CVT was used to simulate post-TAPP optimized catheters for each case by uniformly distributing catheters throughout a 2D projection of the target volume. The number of catheters in the CVT arrangement was equal to the number of catheters in the clinical implant, or the number of available template positions in the CVT planning region (defined as the high risk clinical target volume [HR-CTV] minus OARs projected onto the template plane), whichever number was lower. Treatment plans were then manually generated by a single expert for both the CVT and clinical catheter arrangements. Plan acceptability was evaluated via compliance with the EMBRACE-II dose-volume histogram limits in equieffective dose in 2 Gy per fraction (EQD2). Measures of dose inhomogeneity (%V150HR-CTV and %V200HR-CTV) were also recorded. Results The mean time for catheter optimization using CVT was 11.49 s. In all cases but 1, the CVT arrangements led to improved or EMBRACE-II compliant treatment plans with as many or fewer inserted catheters compared to the clinical cases (Figure 1). An increase in mean D90HR-CTV, D98HR-CTV, and D98IR-CTV was observed in the CVT group compared to the clinical group, as well as a statistically significant 2.2 Gy increase in mean D98GTVres (p < 0.05). A 2.2% increase in mean %V150HR-CTV was observed in the CVT group (p < 0.05). The mean number of unused catheters decreased from 4 in the clinical plans to 0 in the CVT plans (p < 0.001), and the acceptability rate increased from 50% with clinical catheters to 66.67% wit","PeriodicalId":93914,"journal":{"name":"Brachytherapy","volume":"15 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"135434429","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
PO54 PO54
Pub Date : 2023-09-01 DOI: 10.1016/j.brachy.2023.06.155
Joel Poder, Philip Turner, Yaw Chin, Nadine Beydoun, Ese Enari, Andrew Howie
Purpose Low dose rate (LDR) brachytherapy has been proven to be an effective modality for monotherapy treatment of low-intermediate risk prostate cancer. The most commonly used treatment workflow follows a pre-planning approach utilising trans-rectal ultrasound (TRUS) images acquired under sedation, or nomogram planning based on manual measurements of prostate volume and dimensions. This study presents an alternative approach in which diagnostic magnetic resonance images (MRI) are used for the purpose of treatment planning, eliminating the necessity of an additional operating theatre procedure for the purposes of treatment planning, whilst tailoring the plan specifically to the patient's anatomy. Materials and Methods A retrospective study (n=10) was performed comparing the MRI and TRUS pre-planned approaches. The MRI pre-planned approach was retrospectively simulated by creating an LDR brachytherapy plan on diagnostic MR images using the Varian Variseed (v9.0.03) brachytherapy treatment planning system according to local protocols. This plan was then copied onto previously obtained TRUS planning images for the same patient. TRUS and MRI pre-plans were compared by evaluating plan quality metrics such as: the volume of the prostate receiving 100% (V100%), 150% (V150%), and 200% (V200%), dose to 90% of the prostate volume (D90%), as well as the rectum V100%, and urethra V125%. The prescription dose used in each plan was 145 Gy. The number of needles and number of seeds used in each approach was also compared. Statistical significance was tested for via the paired two sides t-test (p < 0.05). A prospective comparison study of operating theatre time usage is ongoing. Results Retrospective comparison of the planning approaches showed no statistically significant differences in plan quality metrics, apart from for the rectum V100%. The TRUS and MRI pre-planned approaches achieved an average rectum V100% of 0.14 cc and 0.33 cc (p = 0.008), respectively. Both approaches easily met the clinical constraint of rectum V100% < 1 cc, and thus the difference between the techniques was not clinically significant. All other plan quality metrics met departmentally defined clinical planning constraints for both the TRUS and MRI planned technique. Preliminary results comparing operating theatre time usage has shown significant time savings using the MRI-pre planning technique. Conclusions The MRI pre-planned approach for LDR prostate brachytherapy has been shown to achieve dosimetrically equivalent plans to TRUS based pre-plans, using less operating theatre resources. This technique is a safe and effective form of LDR prostate brachytherapy treatment planning for eligible patients. Low dose rate (LDR) brachytherapy has been proven to be an effective modality for monotherapy treatment of low-intermediate risk prostate cancer. The most commonly used treatment workflow follows a pre-planning approach utilising trans-rectal ultrasound (TRUS) images acquired under sedati
目的低剂量率(LDR)近距离放射治疗已被证明是单药治疗中低危前列腺癌的有效方式。最常用的治疗流程遵循预先计划方法,利用镇静下获得的经直肠超声(TRUS)图像,或基于手动测量前列腺体积和尺寸的nomographic计划。本研究提出了一种替代方法,其中诊断性磁共振图像(MRI)用于治疗计划的目的,消除了为治疗计划而进行额外手术室手术的必要性,同时根据患者的解剖结构专门定制计划。材料和方法回顾性研究(n=10),比较MRI和TRUS预先计划入路。通过使用Varian Variseed (v9.0.03)近距离治疗计划系统根据当地协议在诊断MR图像上创建LDR近距离治疗计划,回顾性模拟MRI预先计划的方法。然后将该计划复制到先前获得的同一患者的TRUS计划图像上。通过评估计划质量指标,如前列腺体积接受100% (V100%), 150% (V150%)和200% (V200%),剂量达到前列腺体积的90% (D90%),以及直肠V100%和尿道V125%,对TRUS和MRI预计划进行比较。每个方案的处方剂量为145 Gy。并比较了两种方法的针数和种子数。经配对双侧t检验,差异有统计学意义(p < 0.05)。一项关于手术室时间使用的前瞻性比较研究正在进行中。结果两种计划方法的回顾性比较显示,除直肠V100%外,计划质量指标无统计学差异。TRUS和MRI预先计划入路的平均直肠V100%分别为0.14 cc和0.33 cc (p = 0.008)。两种入路均容易满足直肠V100% < 1cc的临床约束,因此两种入路的临床差异无统计学意义。所有其他计划质量指标均满足科室定义的TRUS和MRI计划技术的临床计划约束。比较手术室时间使用的初步结果显示,使用mri预计划技术可以节省大量时间。结论MRI预计划方法用于LDR前列腺近距离治疗已被证明与基于TRUS的预计划在剂量学上相当,使用较少的手术室资源。对于符合条件的患者,这项技术是一种安全有效的LDR前列腺近距离治疗方案。低剂量率(LDR)近距离放射治疗已被证明是单药治疗低、中危前列腺癌的有效方式。最常用的治疗流程遵循预先计划方法,利用镇静下获得的经直肠超声(TRUS)图像,或基于手动测量前列腺体积和尺寸的nomographic计划。本研究提出了一种替代方法,其中诊断性磁共振图像(MRI)用于治疗计划的目的,消除了为治疗计划而进行额外手术室手术的必要性,同时根据患者的解剖结构专门定制计划。回顾性研究(n=10)比较MRI和TRUS预先计划入路。通过使用Varian Variseed (v9.0.03)近距离治疗计划系统根据当地协议在诊断MR图像上创建LDR近距离治疗计划,回顾性模拟MRI预先计划的方法。然后将该计划复制到先前获得的同一患者的TRUS计划图像上。通过评估计划质量指标,如前列腺体积接受100% (V100%), 150% (V150%)和200% (V200%),剂量达到前列腺体积的90% (D90%),以及直肠V100%和尿道V125%,对TRUS和MRI预计划进行比较。每个方案的处方剂量为145 Gy。并比较了两种方法的针数和种子数。经配对双侧t检验,差异有统计学意义(p < 0.05)。一项关于手术室时间使用的前瞻性比较研究正在进行中。计划方法的回顾性比较显示,除了直肠V100%外,计划质量指标没有统计学上的显著差异。TRUS和MRI预先计划入路的平均直肠V100%分别为0.14 cc和0.33 cc (p = 0.008)。两种入路均容易满足直肠V100% < 1cc的临床约束,因此两种入路的临床差异无统计学意义。所有其他计划质量指标均满足科室定义的TRUS和MRI计划技术的临床计划约束。 目的低剂量率(LDR)近距离放射治疗已被证明是单药治疗中低危前列腺癌的有效方式。最常用的治疗流程遵循预先计划方法,利用镇静下获得的经直肠超声(TRUS)图像,或基于手动测量前列腺体积和尺寸的nomographic计划。本研究提出了一种替代方法,其中诊断性磁共振图像(MRI)用于治疗计划的目的,消除了为治疗计划而进行额外手术室手术的必要性,同时根据患者的解剖结构专门定制计划。材料和方法回顾性研究(n=10),比较MRI和TRUS预先计划入路。通过使用Varian Variseed (v9.0.03)近距离治疗计划系统根据当地协议在诊断MR图像上创建LDR近距离治疗计划,回顾性模拟MRI预先计划的方法。然后将该计划复制到先前获得的同一患者的TRUS计划图像上。通过评估计划质量指标,如前列腺体积接受100% (V100%), 150% (V150%)和200% (V200%),剂量达到前列腺体积的90% (D90%),以及直肠V100%和尿道V125%,对TRUS和MRI预计划进行比较。每个方案的处方剂量为145 Gy。并比较了两种方法的针数和种子数。经配对双侧t检验,差异有统计学意义(p < 0.05)。一项关于手术室时间使用的前瞻性比较研究正在进行中。结果两种计划方法的回顾性比较显示,除直肠V100%外,计划质量指标无统计学差异。TRUS和MRI预先计划入路的平均直肠V100%分别为0.14 cc和0.33 cc (p = 0.008)。两种入路均容易满足直肠V100% < 1cc的临床约束,因此两种入路的临床差异无统计学意义。所有其他计划质量指标均满足科室定义的TRUS和MRI计划技术的临床计划约束。比较手术室时间使用的初步结果显示,使用mri预计划技术可以节省大量时间。结论MRI预计划方法用于LDR前列腺近距离治疗已被证明与基于TRUS的预计划在剂量学上相当,使用较少的手术室资源。对于符合条件的患者,这项技术是一种安全有效的LDR前列腺近距离治疗方案。低剂量率(LDR)近距离放射治疗已被证明是单药治疗低、中危前列腺癌的有效方式。最常用的治疗流程遵循预先计划方法,利用镇静下获得的经直肠超声(TRUS)图像,或基于手动测量前列腺体积和尺寸的nomographic计划。本研究提出了一种替代方法,其中诊断性磁共振图像(MRI)用于治疗计划的目的,消除了为治疗计划而进行额外手术室手术的必要性,同时根据患者的解剖结构专门定制计划。回顾性研究(n=10)比较MRI和TRUS预先计划入路。通过使用Varian Variseed (v9.0.03)近距离治疗计划系统根据当地协议在诊断MR图像上创建LDR近距离治疗计划,回顾性模拟MRI预先计划的方法。然后将该计划复制到先前获得的同一患者的TRUS计划图像上。通过评估计划质量指标,如前列腺体积接受100% (V100%), 150% (V150%)和200% (V200%),剂量达到前列腺体积的90% (D90%),以及直肠V100%和尿道V125%,对TRUS和MRI预计划进行比较。每个方案的处方剂量为145 Gy。并比较了两种方法的针数和种子数。经配对双侧t检验,差异有统计学意义(p < 0.05)。一项关于手术室时间使用的前瞻性比较研究正在进行中。计划方法的回顾性比较显示,除了直肠V100%外,计划质量指标没有统计学上的显著差异。TRUS和MRI预先计划入路的平均直肠V1
{"title":"PO54","authors":"Joel Poder, Philip Turner, Yaw Chin, Nadine Beydoun, Ese Enari, Andrew Howie","doi":"10.1016/j.brachy.2023.06.155","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.brachy.2023.06.155","url":null,"abstract":"Purpose Low dose rate (LDR) brachytherapy has been proven to be an effective modality for monotherapy treatment of low-intermediate risk prostate cancer. The most commonly used treatment workflow follows a pre-planning approach utilising trans-rectal ultrasound (TRUS) images acquired under sedation, or nomogram planning based on manual measurements of prostate volume and dimensions. This study presents an alternative approach in which diagnostic magnetic resonance images (MRI) are used for the purpose of treatment planning, eliminating the necessity of an additional operating theatre procedure for the purposes of treatment planning, whilst tailoring the plan specifically to the patient's anatomy. Materials and Methods A retrospective study (n=10) was performed comparing the MRI and TRUS pre-planned approaches. The MRI pre-planned approach was retrospectively simulated by creating an LDR brachytherapy plan on diagnostic MR images using the Varian Variseed (v9.0.03) brachytherapy treatment planning system according to local protocols. This plan was then copied onto previously obtained TRUS planning images for the same patient. TRUS and MRI pre-plans were compared by evaluating plan quality metrics such as: the volume of the prostate receiving 100% (V100%), 150% (V150%), and 200% (V200%), dose to 90% of the prostate volume (D90%), as well as the rectum V100%, and urethra V125%. The prescription dose used in each plan was 145 Gy. The number of needles and number of seeds used in each approach was also compared. Statistical significance was tested for via the paired two sides t-test (p < 0.05). A prospective comparison study of operating theatre time usage is ongoing. Results Retrospective comparison of the planning approaches showed no statistically significant differences in plan quality metrics, apart from for the rectum V100%. The TRUS and MRI pre-planned approaches achieved an average rectum V100% of 0.14 cc and 0.33 cc (p = 0.008), respectively. Both approaches easily met the clinical constraint of rectum V100% < 1 cc, and thus the difference between the techniques was not clinically significant. All other plan quality metrics met departmentally defined clinical planning constraints for both the TRUS and MRI planned technique. Preliminary results comparing operating theatre time usage has shown significant time savings using the MRI-pre planning technique. Conclusions The MRI pre-planned approach for LDR prostate brachytherapy has been shown to achieve dosimetrically equivalent plans to TRUS based pre-plans, using less operating theatre resources. This technique is a safe and effective form of LDR prostate brachytherapy treatment planning for eligible patients. Low dose rate (LDR) brachytherapy has been proven to be an effective modality for monotherapy treatment of low-intermediate risk prostate cancer. The most commonly used treatment workflow follows a pre-planning approach utilising trans-rectal ultrasound (TRUS) images acquired under sedati","PeriodicalId":93914,"journal":{"name":"Brachytherapy","volume":"42 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"135434512","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
PO45 PO45
Pub Date : 2023-09-01 DOI: 10.1016/j.brachy.2023.06.146
Shubhangi Shah, Xiaoyan Deng, Emma Fields, Dipankar Bandyopadhyay, Bridget Quinn
Purpose Endometrial cancer (EC) is the most common gynecologic malignancy and the fourth most common cancer in women [1]. Treatment is composed of a total hysterectomy, possibly followed by adjuvant chemotherapy or radiation therapy (RT) based on risk factors and staging [2]. Consistent follow up after treatment is integral to assessing for both toxicities and recurrence. Encouraging adjuvant vaginal dilator use has been shown to prevent vaginal stenosis, a common side effect of both surgery and RT [2]. However, about 9% of the female population in the USA face significant geographical barriers to receiving gynecologic cancer treatment [3]. Furthermore, previous studies showed being over 50 miles from a high-volume hospital was associated with increased risk of non-adherence care and increased mortality [4]. Increased time from endometrial biopsy to surgery is one documented factor that increased risk of poor outcomes [5]. This retrospective study evaluates if geographical location is associated with access to endometrial cancer care and post-radiation vaginal stenosis. Materials and Methods Patients enrolled in the study underwent surgery +/- RT for Stage I-IIIC endometrial cancer. Vaginal dilator use was recommended to all patients receiving RT. Vaginal length at follow up visits was measured with a vaginal sound. Data from patient charts was used to determine patient demographics, location, and follow up care. Results Forty-two patients had sufficient data for analysis. Average distance from the treatment hospital was 40.9 miles, 54% of patients lived in an urban county. Average number of days from an endometrial biopsy to surgical treatment was 43 days. Living >80 miles from the hospital was associated with an 80% increase in the days between an endometrial biopsy and surgery, compared to those living within 20 miles (p<0.01). Average months of follow up after surgery was 31. There was no impact of an increased distance from the hospital affecting months of follow-up care, vaginal stenosis, or dilator adherence. Conclusions This study provides evidence that living extreme distances from a high-volume cancer center is associated with delayed access to care. Furthermore, there's no direct impact of geography on post-RT vaginal dilation or adherence to care. Our findings suggest reduced discrimination in EC care despite geographical barriers. Further studies to evaluate impact of geography on mortality rates are needed. References: 1. BRAUN MM, OVERBEEK-WAGER EA, GRUMBO RJ. Diagnosis and Management of Endometrial Cancer. Am Fam Physician. 2016;93(6):468-474. Accessed January 30, 2023. https://www.aafp.org/pubs/afp/issues/2016/0315/p468.html2. Quinn, BA, et al. Change in Vaginal Length and Sexual Function in Women Who Undergo Surgery ± Radiation Therapy for Endometrial Cancer . Brachytherapy, 2023. In press.3. Shalowitz DI, Vinograd AM, Giuntoli RL. Geographic access to gynecologic cancer care in the United States. Gynecol Oncol. 2015;138(1):115-
子宫内膜癌(Endometrial cancer, EC)是最常见的妇科恶性肿瘤,也是女性第四大常见癌症[1]。治疗包括全子宫切除术,根据危险因素和分期,可能随后进行辅助化疗或放疗(RT)[2]。治疗后的持续随访是评估毒性和复发的必要条件。鼓励辅助使用阴道扩张器已被证明可以预防阴道狭窄,这是手术和RT的常见副作用[2]。然而,美国约有9%的女性在接受妇科癌症治疗方面面临明显的地理障碍[3]。此外,先前的研究表明,距离大型医院超过50英里与不遵守护理的风险增加和死亡率增加有关[4]。从子宫内膜活检到手术的时间增加是增加不良预后风险的一个有记载的因素[5]。这项回顾性研究评估地理位置是否与获得子宫内膜癌治疗和放疗后阴道狭窄有关。材料和方法入选研究的I-IIIC期子宫内膜癌患者接受手术+/- RT治疗。建议所有接受阴道扩张器治疗的患者使用阴道扩张器。随访时阴道长度用阴道声测量。来自患者图表的数据用于确定患者的人口统计、位置和随访护理。结果42例患者资料充足,可供分析。到治疗医院的平均距离为40.9英里,54%的患者居住在城市县。从子宫内膜活检到手术治疗的平均天数为43天。与居住在20英里以内的人相比,居住在距离医院>80英里的人子宫内膜活检和手术之间的天数增加了80%(与居住在20英里以内的人相比,居住在距离医院>80英里的人子宫内膜活检和手术之间的天数增加了80% (p<0.01)。术后平均随访时间为31个月。离医院距离的增加对随访时间、阴道狭窄或扩张器依从性没有影响。这项研究提供的证据表明,居住在离大型癌症中心极远的地方与延迟获得护理有关。此外,地理位置对rt后阴道扩张或护理依从性没有直接影响。我们的研究结果表明,尽管存在地理障碍,但EC护理中的歧视减少了。需要进一步研究以评估地理对死亡率的影响。引用:1。布朗mm, overbek - wager ea, grumbo rj。子宫内膜癌的诊断和治疗。中华医学杂志,2016;93(6):468-474。2023年1月30日访问。https://www.aafp.org/pubs/afp/issues/2016/0315/p468.html2。Quinn, BA等人。子宫内膜癌手术±放疗后女性阴道长度和性功能的变化。近距离放射疗法,2023年。在press.3。Shalowitz DI, Vinograd AM, Giuntoli RL。美国妇科癌症治疗的地理可及性中华妇产科杂志,2015;38(1):115-120。doi: 10.1016 / J.YGYNO.2015.04.0254。Bristow RE, Powell MA, al - hammadi N,等。根据种族和社会经济地位卵巢癌护理质量和生存的差异。中华肿瘤杂志,2013;35(11):823。doi: 10.1093 / JNCI / DJT0655。Shalowitz DI, Epstein AJ, Buckingham L, Ko EM, Giuntoli RL。子宫内膜癌手术治疗时间对生存率的影响。中华妇产科杂志,2017;16(3):388 - 388。doi: 10.1016 / j.ajog.2016.11.1050
{"title":"PO45","authors":"Shubhangi Shah, Xiaoyan Deng, Emma Fields, Dipankar Bandyopadhyay, Bridget Quinn","doi":"10.1016/j.brachy.2023.06.146","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.brachy.2023.06.146","url":null,"abstract":"Purpose Endometrial cancer (EC) is the most common gynecologic malignancy and the fourth most common cancer in women [1]. Treatment is composed of a total hysterectomy, possibly followed by adjuvant chemotherapy or radiation therapy (RT) based on risk factors and staging [2]. Consistent follow up after treatment is integral to assessing for both toxicities and recurrence. Encouraging adjuvant vaginal dilator use has been shown to prevent vaginal stenosis, a common side effect of both surgery and RT [2]. However, about 9% of the female population in the USA face significant geographical barriers to receiving gynecologic cancer treatment [3]. Furthermore, previous studies showed being over 50 miles from a high-volume hospital was associated with increased risk of non-adherence care and increased mortality [4]. Increased time from endometrial biopsy to surgery is one documented factor that increased risk of poor outcomes [5]. This retrospective study evaluates if geographical location is associated with access to endometrial cancer care and post-radiation vaginal stenosis. Materials and Methods Patients enrolled in the study underwent surgery +/- RT for Stage I-IIIC endometrial cancer. Vaginal dilator use was recommended to all patients receiving RT. Vaginal length at follow up visits was measured with a vaginal sound. Data from patient charts was used to determine patient demographics, location, and follow up care. Results Forty-two patients had sufficient data for analysis. Average distance from the treatment hospital was 40.9 miles, 54% of patients lived in an urban county. Average number of days from an endometrial biopsy to surgical treatment was 43 days. Living >80 miles from the hospital was associated with an 80% increase in the days between an endometrial biopsy and surgery, compared to those living within 20 miles (p<0.01). Average months of follow up after surgery was 31. There was no impact of an increased distance from the hospital affecting months of follow-up care, vaginal stenosis, or dilator adherence. Conclusions This study provides evidence that living extreme distances from a high-volume cancer center is associated with delayed access to care. Furthermore, there's no direct impact of geography on post-RT vaginal dilation or adherence to care. Our findings suggest reduced discrimination in EC care despite geographical barriers. Further studies to evaluate impact of geography on mortality rates are needed. References: 1. BRAUN MM, OVERBEEK-WAGER EA, GRUMBO RJ. Diagnosis and Management of Endometrial Cancer. Am Fam Physician. 2016;93(6):468-474. Accessed January 30, 2023. https://www.aafp.org/pubs/afp/issues/2016/0315/p468.html2. Quinn, BA, et al. Change in Vaginal Length and Sexual Function in Women Who Undergo Surgery ± Radiation Therapy for Endometrial Cancer . Brachytherapy, 2023. In press.3. Shalowitz DI, Vinograd AM, Giuntoli RL. Geographic access to gynecologic cancer care in the United States. Gynecol Oncol. 2015;138(1):115-","PeriodicalId":93914,"journal":{"name":"Brachytherapy","volume":"9 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"135434515","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
PO09 PO09
Pub Date : 2023-09-01 DOI: 10.1016/j.brachy.2023.06.110
Sergej Sergeich Romanenko
According to our experience, intracavitary brachytherapy of metastasis into vagina is not effective, especially in the case of volumetric tumor. As a rule we use intratissue brachytherapy with an intracavitary applicator of maximal diameter. Patient and Methods In 2020 Ca of transverse colon was diagnosed in a patient 58 years old, female. Ultrasonography, CT, MRI investigations and biopsy confirmed mts in both ovarian, pathological retroperitoneal, mesenteric and intracranial lymph nodes, left lobe of liver. First line of treatment included surgery, chemotherapy and hormone therapy. Operations: median laparotomy, right-sided hemicolectomy, atypical resection of the left lobe of liver. Chemotherapy (14 courses) - 8 courses with oxaliplatin and capecitabine and 6 courses with irinotecan. Mts into vagina were revealed a month after completing the treatment. 39,6 Gy (2.2 Gy*18 fractions) to pelvis with concomitant intracavitary brachytherapy 7Gy*4, total dose 28 Gy with normalization 5 mm from mucosa was delivered. In three months volumetric lesion in vagina right wall was confirmed at CT scans and visually. Intratissue brachytherapy with rigid needles was decided to use. Dose distribution and needle location is shown at the Figure. Needle insertion was done by freehand under anesthesia. Doses amounted to 30 Gy (1 time per week, 10 Gy fraction). Treatment was carried out at Microselectron 30 channels on the base of CT scans. Radiation reactions (burning and profuse discharge) lasted one month approximately. Results In 3 months CT with contrast did not show the presence of pathological foci in the body. And visually vagina had no signs of a tumor. Conclusion It was shown that intratissue brachytherapy is effective in the treatment of tumors affecting vagina. According to our experience, intracavitary brachytherapy of metastasis into vagina is not effective, especially in the case of volumetric tumor. As a rule we use intratissue brachytherapy with an intracavitary applicator of maximal diameter. In 2020 Ca of transverse colon was diagnosed in a patient 58 years old, female. Ultrasonography, CT, MRI investigations and biopsy confirmed mts in both ovarian, pathological retroperitoneal, mesenteric and intracranial lymph nodes, left lobe of liver. First line of treatment included surgery, chemotherapy and hormone therapy. Operations: median laparotomy, right-sided hemicolectomy, atypical resection of the left lobe of liver. Chemotherapy (14 courses) - 8 courses with oxaliplatin and capecitabine and 6 courses with irinotecan. Mts into vagina were revealed a month after completing the treatment. 39,6 Gy (2.2 Gy*18 fractions) to pelvis with concomitant intracavitary brachytherapy 7Gy*4, total dose 28 Gy with normalization 5 mm from mucosa was delivered. In three months volumetric lesion in vagina right wall was confirmed at CT scans and visually. Intratissue brachytherapy with rigid needles was decided to use. Dose distribution and needle location is shown
根据我们的经验,腔内近距离治疗转移到阴道是无效的,特别是在体积肿瘤的情况下。作为一个规则,我们使用组织内近距离治疗与最大直径的腔内涂抹器。患者与方法2020年确诊横结肠Ca 1例,年龄58岁,女性。超声、CT、MRI检查及活检均证实卵巢、病理腹膜后、肠系膜及颅内淋巴结、肝左叶均有mts。一线治疗包括手术、化疗和激素治疗。手术:剖腹正中开腹,右侧半结肠切除术,非典型左肝叶切除术。化疗(14个疗程)-奥沙利铂加卡培他滨8个疗程,伊立替康6个疗程。在完成治疗一个月后,发现了阴道内的Mts。盆腔内近距离放射治疗7Gy*4,总剂量28 Gy,距粘膜5 mm处给予放疗。3个月后,经CT及目测证实阴道右壁体积病变。决定采用硬针组织内近距离治疗。剂量分布和针头位置如图所示。麻醉下徒手插针。剂量为30 Gy(每周1次,10 Gy分数)。在CT扫描的基础上进行微选择30通道治疗。辐射反应(燃烧和大量放电)持续约一个月。结果3个月CT造影未见体内病变灶。从视觉上看阴道也没有肿瘤的迹象。结论组织内近距离放疗是治疗阴道肿瘤的有效方法。根据我们的经验,腔内近距离治疗转移到阴道是无效的,特别是在体积肿瘤的情况下。作为一个规则,我们使用组织内近距离治疗与最大直径的腔内涂抹器。2020年确诊横结肠Ca 1例,年龄58岁,女性。超声、CT、MRI检查及活检均证实卵巢、病理腹膜后、肠系膜及颅内淋巴结、肝左叶均有mts。一线治疗包括手术、化疗和激素治疗。手术:剖腹正中开腹,右侧半结肠切除术,非典型左肝叶切除术。化疗(14个疗程)-奥沙利铂加卡培他滨8个疗程,伊立替康6个疗程。在完成治疗一个月后,发现了阴道内的Mts。盆腔内近距离放射治疗7Gy*4,总剂量28 Gy,距粘膜5 mm处给予放疗。3个月后,经CT及目测证实阴道右壁体积病变。决定采用硬针组织内近距离治疗。剂量分布和针头位置如图所示。麻醉下徒手插针。剂量为30 Gy(每周1次,10 Gy分数)。在CT扫描的基础上进行微选择30通道治疗。辐射反应(燃烧和大量放电)持续约一个月。3个月CT造影未见体内病变灶。从视觉上看阴道也没有肿瘤的迹象。研究表明,组织内近距离放射治疗对阴道肿瘤有较好的疗效。
{"title":"PO09","authors":"Sergej Sergeich Romanenko","doi":"10.1016/j.brachy.2023.06.110","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.brachy.2023.06.110","url":null,"abstract":"According to our experience, intracavitary brachytherapy of metastasis into vagina is not effective, especially in the case of volumetric tumor. As a rule we use intratissue brachytherapy with an intracavitary applicator of maximal diameter. Patient and Methods In 2020 Ca of transverse colon was diagnosed in a patient 58 years old, female. Ultrasonography, CT, MRI investigations and biopsy confirmed mts in both ovarian, pathological retroperitoneal, mesenteric and intracranial lymph nodes, left lobe of liver. First line of treatment included surgery, chemotherapy and hormone therapy. Operations: median laparotomy, right-sided hemicolectomy, atypical resection of the left lobe of liver. Chemotherapy (14 courses) - 8 courses with oxaliplatin and capecitabine and 6 courses with irinotecan. Mts into vagina were revealed a month after completing the treatment. 39,6 Gy (2.2 Gy*18 fractions) to pelvis with concomitant intracavitary brachytherapy 7Gy*4, total dose 28 Gy with normalization 5 mm from mucosa was delivered. In three months volumetric lesion in vagina right wall was confirmed at CT scans and visually. Intratissue brachytherapy with rigid needles was decided to use. Dose distribution and needle location is shown at the Figure. Needle insertion was done by freehand under anesthesia. Doses amounted to 30 Gy (1 time per week, 10 Gy fraction). Treatment was carried out at Microselectron 30 channels on the base of CT scans. Radiation reactions (burning and profuse discharge) lasted one month approximately. Results In 3 months CT with contrast did not show the presence of pathological foci in the body. And visually vagina had no signs of a tumor. Conclusion It was shown that intratissue brachytherapy is effective in the treatment of tumors affecting vagina. According to our experience, intracavitary brachytherapy of metastasis into vagina is not effective, especially in the case of volumetric tumor. As a rule we use intratissue brachytherapy with an intracavitary applicator of maximal diameter. In 2020 Ca of transverse colon was diagnosed in a patient 58 years old, female. Ultrasonography, CT, MRI investigations and biopsy confirmed mts in both ovarian, pathological retroperitoneal, mesenteric and intracranial lymph nodes, left lobe of liver. First line of treatment included surgery, chemotherapy and hormone therapy. Operations: median laparotomy, right-sided hemicolectomy, atypical resection of the left lobe of liver. Chemotherapy (14 courses) - 8 courses with oxaliplatin and capecitabine and 6 courses with irinotecan. Mts into vagina were revealed a month after completing the treatment. 39,6 Gy (2.2 Gy*18 fractions) to pelvis with concomitant intracavitary brachytherapy 7Gy*4, total dose 28 Gy with normalization 5 mm from mucosa was delivered. In three months volumetric lesion in vagina right wall was confirmed at CT scans and visually. Intratissue brachytherapy with rigid needles was decided to use. Dose distribution and needle location is shown ","PeriodicalId":93914,"journal":{"name":"Brachytherapy","volume":"184 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"135434520","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
期刊
Brachytherapy
全部 Acc. Chem. Res. ACS Applied Bio Materials ACS Appl. Electron. Mater. ACS Appl. Energy Mater. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces ACS Appl. Nano Mater. ACS Appl. Polym. Mater. ACS BIOMATER-SCI ENG ACS Catal. ACS Cent. Sci. ACS Chem. Biol. ACS Chemical Health & Safety ACS Chem. Neurosci. ACS Comb. Sci. ACS Earth Space Chem. ACS Energy Lett. ACS Infect. Dis. ACS Macro Lett. ACS Mater. Lett. ACS Med. Chem. Lett. ACS Nano ACS Omega ACS Photonics ACS Sens. ACS Sustainable Chem. Eng. ACS Synth. Biol. Anal. Chem. BIOCHEMISTRY-US Bioconjugate Chem. BIOMACROMOLECULES Chem. Res. Toxicol. Chem. Rev. Chem. Mater. CRYST GROWTH DES ENERG FUEL Environ. Sci. Technol. Environ. Sci. Technol. Lett. Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. IND ENG CHEM RES Inorg. Chem. J. Agric. Food. Chem. J. Chem. Eng. Data J. Chem. Educ. J. Chem. Inf. Model. J. Chem. Theory Comput. J. Med. Chem. J. Nat. Prod. J PROTEOME RES J. Am. Chem. Soc. LANGMUIR MACROMOLECULES Mol. Pharmaceutics Nano Lett. Org. Lett. ORG PROCESS RES DEV ORGANOMETALLICS J. Org. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. A J. Phys. Chem. B J. Phys. Chem. C J. Phys. Chem. Lett. Analyst Anal. Methods Biomater. Sci. Catal. Sci. Technol. Chem. Commun. Chem. Soc. Rev. CHEM EDUC RES PRACT CRYSTENGCOMM Dalton Trans. Energy Environ. Sci. ENVIRON SCI-NANO ENVIRON SCI-PROC IMP ENVIRON SCI-WAT RES Faraday Discuss. Food Funct. Green Chem. Inorg. Chem. Front. Integr. Biol. J. Anal. At. Spectrom. J. Mater. Chem. A J. Mater. Chem. B J. Mater. Chem. C Lab Chip Mater. Chem. Front. Mater. Horiz. MEDCHEMCOMM Metallomics Mol. Biosyst. Mol. Syst. Des. Eng. Nanoscale Nanoscale Horiz. Nat. Prod. Rep. New J. Chem. Org. Biomol. Chem. Org. Chem. Front. PHOTOCH PHOTOBIO SCI PCCP Polym. Chem.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1