Cardiology最新文献

Introduction: The prognostic value of the ratio of haemoglobin to red cell distribution width (HRR) in different types of heart failure (HF) is not well known.

Method and results: We analysed the long-term prognostic value of HRR in patients with HF using the Cox proportional risk model and Kaplan-Meier method. We reviewed consecutive 972 HF patients. The overall mortality rate was 45.68%. Mortality was 52.22% in the HFrEF group and 40.99% in the HFpEF + HFmrEF group. Cox regression showed that when HRR increased by 1 unit, the risk of all-cause death in all HF patients decreased by 22.8% (HR: 0.772, 95% CI: 0.724, 0.823, p < 0.001), in the HFpEF + HFmrEF group it decreased by 15.5% (HR: 0.845, 95% CI: 0.774, 0.923, p < 0.001), and in the HFrEF group it decreased by 36.1% (HR: 0.639, 95% CI: 0.576, 0.709, p < 0.0001). Subgroup analysis showed that there were interactions between the EF and HRR groups. The group in which HRR best predicted all-cause death from HF was group 1 (EF <40%, HRR <9.45), followed by group 2 (EF <40%, HRR ≥9.45), and group 3 (EF ≥40%, HRR <9.45). HRR had no predictive value in group 4 (EF ≥40%, HRR ≥9.45).

Conclusion: HRR is an important predictor of all-cause mortality in patients with HF, especially HFrEF. There is an interaction between HRR group and LVEF group.

Introduction: Valvular heart disease is one of the most common heart diseases. It is characterized by abnormal function or structure of the heart valves. There may be no clinical symptoms in the early stages. Clinical symptoms of arrhythmia, heart failure, or thromboembolic events may occur in the late stages of the disease, such as palpitation after activities, breathing difficulties, fatigue, and so on. Aortic valve disease is a major part of valvular heart disease. The main treatment for aortic valve disease is valve replacement or repair surgery, but it is extremely risky. Therefore, a rigorous prognostic assessment is extremely important for patients with aortic valve disease. The global longitudinal strain is an index that describes the deformation capacity of myocardium. There is evidence that it provides a test for systolic dysfunction other than LVEF (left ventricular ejection fraction) and provides additional prognostic information.

Method: Search literature published between 2010 and 2023 on relevant platforms and contain the following keywords: "Aortic valve disease," "Aortic stenosis," "Aortic regurgitation," and "longitudinal strain" or "strain." The data is then extracted and collated for analysis.

Results: A total of 15 articles were included. The total population involved in this study was 3,678 individuals. The absolute value of LVGLS was higher in the no-MACE group than in the MACE group in patients with aortic stenosis (Z = 8.10, p < 0.00001), and impaired LVGLS was a risk factor for MACE in patients with aortic stenosis (HR = 1.14, p < 0.00001, 95% CI: 1.08-1.20). There was also a correlation between impaired LVGLS and aortic valve surgery in patients with aortic valve disease (HR = 1.16, p < 0.0001, 95% CI: 1.08-1.25) or patients with aortic valve regurgitation (HR = 1.21, p = 0.0004, 95% CI: 1.09-1.34). We also found that impaired LVGLS had no significant association between LVGLS and mortality during the period of follow-up in patients with aortic valve stenosis (HR = 1.08, 95% CI: 0.94-1.25, p = 0.28), but it was associated with mortality in studies of prospective analyses (HR = 1.34, 95% CI: 1.02-1.75, p = 0.04).

Conclusions: Impaired LVGLS correlates with major adverse cardiovascular events in patients with aortic valve disease, and it has predictive value for the prognosis of patients with aortic valve disease.

Introduction: The objective of this study was to evaluate the abnormal myocardial function in HFpEF patients with renal dysfunction (RD) and investigate the relationship between renal function and myocardial mechanical characteristics in patients with HFpEF.

Methods: 134 patients with HFpEF and 32 control subjects were enrolled in our study. Clinical and echocardiography data were collected for offline analysis. Global work index (GWI), global constructive work (GCW), global waste work (GWW), and global work efficiency (GWE) were measured after noninvasive pressure-strain loop analysis. Univariate and multivariate analyses were used to determine the correlation between renal function and myocardial function in patients with HFpEF.

Results: In comparison to control subjects, patients with HFpEF tend to have higher GWW (78 [50-115] vs. 108 [65-160] mm Hg%, p < 0.05) and lower GWE (96 [95-97] vs. 95 [92-96] %, p < 0.05), while left ventricular ejection fraction (65.5 ± 3.3 vs. 64.3 ± 4.6%, p < 0.05) was comparable between them. Besides, increased GWW (86 [58-152] vs. 125 [94-187] mm Hg%, p < 0.05) and decreased GWE (96 [93-97] vs. 94 [92-96] %, p < 0.05) were detected in patients with RD compared to those with normal renal function. An independent correlation was found between estimated glomerular filtration rate and GWW after multivariate analysis.

Discussion/conclusion: More severely impaired myocardial function was detected in HFpEF patients with RD compared to those with normal renal function. Estimated glomerular filtration rate was independently correlated to GWW in patients with HFpEF.

Introduction: Despite contemporary practice guidelines, a substantial number of post-acute coronary syndrome (ACS) patients fail to achieve guideline-recommended LDL-C thresholds. Our study aimed to investigate this guideline recommendations-to-practice care gap. Specifically, we aimed to identify opportunities where additional lipid-lowering therapies are indicated and explore reasons for the non-prescription of guideline-recommended therapies.

Methods: ACS patients with LDL-C ≥1.81 mmol/L (70 mg/dL) despite maximally tolerated statin ± ezetimibe therapy (including those intolerant of ≥2 statins) were enrolled 1-12 months post-event from 27 Canadian and US sites from September 2018 to October 2020 and followed up for three visits during the 12 months post-event. We determined the proportion of patients who did not achieve Canadian/US guideline-recommended LDL-C thresholds, the number of patients who would have been eligible for additional lipid-lowering therapies, and reasons behind lack of escalation in lipid-lowering therapies when indicated. Individual patient and aggregate practice feedback, including guideline-recommended intensification suggestions, were provided to each physician.

Results: Of the 248 patients enrolled in the pilot study (median age 64 [57, 73] years, 31.5% female and STEMI 27.4%), 75.4% were on high-intensity statins on the first visit. A total of 18.5% of those who attended all 3 visits had an LDL-C measured only at the first visit which was above the threshold. After 1 year of follow-up, 51.9% of patients achieved LDL-C thresholds at either visit 2 or 3. In the context of feedback reminding physicians about guideline-directed LDL-C-modifying therapy in their individual participating patients, we observed an increase in the use of ezetimibe and PCSK9 inhibitor therapy at 3-12 months. This was associated with a significant lowering of the mean LDL-C (from 2.93 mmol/L [baseline] to 2.09 mmol/L [3-6 months] to 1.87 mmol/L [6-12 months]) and a significantly greater proportion of patients (from 0% [baseline] to 38.6% [3-6 months] to 53.4% [6-12 months]) achieving guideline-recommended LDL-C thresholds. The most prevalent reasons behind the non-intensification of LDL-C-lowering therapy with ezetimibe and/or PCSK9i were LDL-C levels being close to target, the pre-existing use of other lipid-lowering therapies, patient refusal, and cost.

Conclusion: Although most patients post-ACS were on high-intensity statin therapy, almost 50% failed to achieve guideline-recommended LDL-C thresholds by 1-year follow-up. Furthermore, additional lipid-lowering therapies in this high-risk group were underprescribed, and this might be linked to several factors including potential gaps in physician knowledge, treatment inertia, patient refusal, and cost.